Rates Of Target Vessel Revascularization Research Articles

Drug-Eluting Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Due to Restenosis—DM-Dragon Registry

Background: The rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is decreasing; however, it is still a challenge for contemporary invasive cardiologists. Therapeutic methods, including drug-eluting balloons (DEBs), intravascular lithotripsy, excimer laser coronary atherectomy, and imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES), have been implemented. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are burdened with a higher risk of ISR than the general population. Aims: DM-Dragon is aimed at evaluating the clinical outcomes of ISR treatment with DEBs vs. DES, focusing on patients with co-existing diabetes mellitus. Methods: The DM-Dragon registry is a retrospective study comprising data from nine high-volume PCI centers in Poland. A total of 1117 patients, of whom 473 individuals had DM and were treated with PCI due to ISR, were included. After propensity-score matching (PSM), 198 pairs were created for further analysis. The primary outcome of the study was target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results: In DM patients after PSM, TLR occurred in 21 (10.61%) vs. 20 (10.1%) in non-diabetic patients, p = 0.8690. Rates of target vessel revascularization (TVR), target vessel myocardial infarction, device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE), and cardiac death did not differ significantly. Among diabetic patients, the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DEB group (2.78% vs. 11.11%, HR 3.67 (95% confidence interval, CI) [1.01–13.3), p = 0.0483). Conclusions: PCI with DEBs is almost as effective as DES implantation in DM patients treated for ISR. In DM-Dragon, the rate of all-cause death was significantly lower in patients treated with DEBs. Further large-scale, randomized clinical trials would be needed to support these findings.

The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

The optimal revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease depends on various factors, such as disease complexity, patient characteristics, and preferences. Including a heart team in complex cases is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes. Decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting must consider each patient's clinical profile and coronary anatomy. While current practice guidelines offer some insight into the optimal revascularization approach for the various phenotypes of coronary artery disease, the evidence to support either strategy continues to evolve and grow. Given the large amount of contemporary data on revascularization, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the literature on coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients across the spectrum of coronary artery disease phenotypes. Contemporary evidence suggests that for patients with triple vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting is preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention due to better long-term outcomes, including lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Similarly, for patients with left main coronary artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting can be considered, as they have shown similar efficacy in terms of major adverse cardiac events, but there may be a slightly higher risk of death with percutaneous coronary intervention. For proximal left anterior descending artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting are viable options, but coronary artery bypass grafting has shown lower rates of repeat revascularization and better relief from angina. The Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score can help in decision-making by predicting the risk of adverse events and guiding the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. European and American guidelines both agree with including a heart team that can develop and lay out individualized, optimal treatment options with respect for patient preferences. The debate between coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in multiple different scenarios will continue to develop as technology and techniques improve for both procedures. Risk factors, pre, peri, and post-procedural complications involved in both revascularization strategies will continue to be mitigated to optimize outcomes for those patients for which coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention provide ultimate benefit. Methods to avoid unnecessary revascularization continue to develop as well as percutaneous technology that may allow patients to avoid surgical intervention when possible. With such changes, revascularization guidelines for specific patient populations may change in the coming years, which can serve as a limitation of this time-dated review.

P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Recent studies have shown similar safety and efficacy of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12i) monotherapy when compared with standard DAPT. However, the optimal DAPT duration and regimen in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention is still unclear. Online databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating P2Y12i monotherapy after short DAPT (≤3 months) versus standard DAPT (≥12 months) in ACS patients. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target-vessel revascularization, and major bleeding. Random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Six randomized controlled trials with a total of 23,884 patients (n = 11,904 P2Y12i monotherapy, n = 11,980 standard DAPT) were included. Compared with standard DAPT, P2Y12i monotherapy after short DAPT was associated with similar odds of all-cause death (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.12, p = 0.26) and cardiovascular death (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.29, p = 0.29) at 1 year. Similarly, there were no significant differences in rates of myocardial infarction (OR 1.09, 0.83 to 1.43, p = 0.53), stent thrombosis (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.67, p = 0.70) and target-vessel revascularization (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.01, p = 0.07) between the P2Y12i monotherapy and standard DAPT arms. The P2Y12i monotherapy group had significantly lower major bleeding (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.64, p < 0.001) when compared with standard DAPT. In conclusion, in patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, P2Y12i monotherapy after short DAPT significantly reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic risk when compared with standard DAPT therapy.

Staged versus immediate complete vessel revascularization in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction In patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred modality of reperfusion. However, these patients may also have multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) on coronary angiography which is associated with higher risk of mortality. Current guidelines recommend complete revascularization in STEMI with multivessel CAD, however this poses a high risk for major acute cardiovascular events (MACE). Other available reperfusion strategies include staged vessel revascularization. This meta-analysis aims to determine if staged vessel revascularization can be a better mode of reperfusion strategy in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD. Methods A comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCT) was conducted with the use of staged versus immediate complete vessel revascularization in patients with STEMI. Outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of these techniques were all-cause mortality, MACE and target vessel revascularization. The analyses were done using random effects analysis model by mantel-haenszel statistical method via Review Manager V5.4. Results There were five studies included in the meta-analysis with 1,483 subjects analyzed. There was 26% less risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.74 [95% CI: 0.41-1.31]) and 6% less risk for MACE (RR 0.94 [95% CI: 0.58-1.52]) in staged revascularization compared to immediate complete revascularization. In terms of target-vessel revascularization there was no statistical difference between the two treatment strategies (RR 1.02 [95% CI: 0.57-1.83]). Conclusion Staged and immediate complete vessel revascularization have similar rates of target-vessel revascularization among patients presenting with STEMI. However, staged vessel revascularization showed lower rates of all-cause mortality and MACE, which suggest that this treatment strategy may be a preferable type of revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI with multivessel CAD.

A Visualized Nomogram for Predicting Prognosis in Elderly Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Revascularized patients still experience adverse cardiovascular events. This is particularly true for elderly patients over the age of 65, as they often have more co-morbid vascular conditions. It is important to develop a tool to assist clinicians in comprehensively assessing these patients' prognosis. The objective of this study is to create a comprehensive visual nomogram model combining clinical and physiological assessments to predict outcomes in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study is a retrospective investigation of patients who underwent PCI between January 2016 and December 2017. A total of 691 patients with 1461 vessels were randomly divided into a training (n = 483) and a validation set (n = 208). A multivariate Cox regression model was employed using the training set to select variables for constructing a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed through the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curves to evaluate its discrimination and predictive accuracy. To further assess the clinical usefulness, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and landmark analysis were conducted. Independent risk factors, including diabetes mellitus (DM), post-PCI quantitative flow ratio (QFR), previous myocardial infarction (MI), and previous PCI, were contained in the nomogram. The nomogram exhibited a good area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.742 to 0.789 in the training set, 0.783 to 0.837 in the validation set, and 0.764 to 0.786 in the entire population. Calibration curves demonstrated a well-fitted curve in all three sets. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed clear separation and the patients with higher scores in the nomogram model exhibited a higher incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) (7.99% vs. 1.24% for 2-year, p 0.001 and 13.54% vs. 2.23% for 5-years, p 0.001, respectively). This study has developed the visually intuitive nomogram to predict the 2-year and 5-year TVR rates for elderly patients who underwent PCI. This tool provides more accurate and comprehensive healthcare guidance for patients and their physicians.

Comparison between Imaging and Physiology in Guiding Coronary Revascularization: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a widely used revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease. The choice between imaging-guided and physiology-guided PCI has been a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aims to systematically compare outcomes between imaging and physiology-guided PCI and management of intermediate coronary lesions (ICLs). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases for studies published up to December 2023 following PRISMA guidelines. Seven eligible studies comparing imaging-guided and physiology-guided PCI were selected for the final analysis. Relevant outcome measures included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target vessel failure (TVF), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Subgroup analysis was performed for ICLs. Results: A total of 5701 patients were included in the meta-analysis. After a mean follow-up of 2.1 years, imaging-guided PCI was associated with lower rates of TVR compared to physiology-guided PCI (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95, p = 0.02); concerning MACE, TVF, and TLR, no differences were found. When the analysis was restricted to studies considering ICLs management, there were no differences between the two techniques. Meta regression analysis did not show any impact of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) presentation on MACE and TVR. Conclusions: The findings suggest that imaging-guided PCI may reduce the need for future revascularization of the target vessel compared to the functional-guided approach, and this result was not influenced by ACS presentation. These results may have important implications for clinical practice, guiding interventional cardiologists in selecting the most appropriate guidance strategy.

Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents for patients at high risk of bleedings: A network meta-analysis.

Among different coronary stents implanted in High Bleeding Risk (HBR) patients with an indication for short antiplatelet therapy, no comparisons in terms of efficacy have been provided. A Network Meta Analysis was performed including all randomized controlled trials comparing different coronary stents evaluated in HBR patients. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs) as defined by each included trial were the primary end point, whereas TLR (target lesion revascularization), TVR (target vessel revascularization), stent thrombosis and total and major (BARC3-5) bleedings were the secondary ones. A total of four studies (ONYX ONE, LEADERS FREE, SENIOR and HBR in BIO-RESORT) including 6637 patients were analyzed with different kind of stents and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) length (1 or 6 months) on 12 months follow-up. About one-third of these patients were defined HBR due to indication for oral anticoagulation. All drug eluting stents (DESs) reduced risk of MACE compared to Bare Metal Stents (BMSs) when followed by a 1-month DAPT. At SUCRA analysis, Orsiro was the device with the highest probability of performing best. Rates of TLR and TVR were significantly lower when using Resolute Onyx, Synergy and BioFreedom stents in comparison to BMS when followed by 1-month DAPT, with Synergy ranking best. Synergy also showed a significantly lower number of stent thrombosis compared to BMS (RR 0.28, 95%CI 0.06-0.93), while Orsiro and Resolute Integrity showed the highest probability of performing best. In HBRs patients, all DESs were superior to BMSs in terms of efficacy and safety. Among DESs, Orsiro was the one with the highest ranking in terms of MACE, mainly driven by a reduced incidence of repeated revascularization and stent thrombosis.

Prevalence and prognostic impact of complex percutaneous coronary intervention among octogenarians.

The number of octogenarians referred to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)is rising steadily. The prevalence and prognostic impact of complex PCI (CPCI)in this vulnerable population has not been fully evaluated. Patients ≥80 years old who underwent PCI between 2012 and 2019 at Mount Sinai Hospital were included. Patients were categorized based on PCI complexity, defined as the presence of at least one of the following criteria: use of atherectomy, total stent length ≥60 mm, ≥3 stents implanted, bifurcation treated with at least 2 stents, PCI involving ≥3 vessels, ≥3 lesions, left main, saphenous vein graft or chronic total occlusion. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE),a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI),or target-vessel revascularization (TVR),within 1 year after PCI. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding. Among 2657 octogenarians, 1387 (52%) underwent CPCI and were more likely to be men and to have cardiovascular risk factors or comorbidities. CPCI as compared with no-CPCIwas associated with a higher 1-year risk of MACE (16.6% vs. 11.1%, adjusted HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.06-1.77, p value 0.017), due to an excess of MI and TVR, and major bleeding (10% vs. 5.8%, adjusted HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.55, p value 0.002). Among octogenarians, CPCI was associated with a significantly higher 1-year risk of MACE, due to higher rates of MI and TVR but not of all-cause death, and of major bleeding. Strategies to reduce complications should be implemented in octogenarians undergoing CPCI.

SYNERGY—Everolimus-Eluting Stent With a Bioabsorbable Polymer in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: CLEAR SYNERGY OASIS-9 Registry

Our objective was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the SYNERGY stent in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The only drug eluting stent approved for treatment of STEMI by the FDA is the Taxus stent which is no longer commercially available, so further data are needed. The CLEAR SYNERGY stent registry was embedded into a larger randomized trial of patients with STEMI (N=7000), comparing colchicine vs. placebo and spironolactone vs. placebo. The primary outcome for the SYNERGY stent registry is major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as defined by cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, or unplanned ischemia driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) within 12 months. We estimated a MACE rate of 6.3% at 12 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for STEMI based on the TOTAL trial. Success was defined as upper bound of confidence interval (CI) to be less than the performance goal of 9.45%.Overall, 733 patients were enrolled from 8 countries with a mean age 60.2 years, 19% diabetes, 41.3% anterior MI and median door to balloon time of 72 minutes. The MACE rate was 4.8% (95% CI 3.2-6.3%) at 12 months which met the success criteria against performance goal of 9.45%. The rates of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI or TVR were 2.7%, 1.9%, 1.0% respectively. The rates of acute definite stent thrombosis were 0.3%, subacute 0.4%, late 0.4% and cumulative stent thrombosis of 1.1% at 12 months. In conclusion, the SYNERGY stent in STEMI performed well and was successful compared to the performance goal based on prior trials.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03048825

The Impact of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Introduction The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a significant predictor of cardiovascular diseases, influencing their progression and prognosis. The exact role of the NLR in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear. We investigated the possible association between peak NLR values within the first three days after STEMI onset and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This retrospective study included 641 patients who were diagnosed with acute STEMI and treated with primary PCI for 18 months at Dr. Siyami Ersek Hospital. The NLR was calculated using the maximum values obtained during the first three days after admission. The patients were divided into quartiles according to their NLR values for further analysis of potential complications during and after hospitalization, up to a follow-up period of three months. Results Significant differences were found in factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), and length of hospital stay among these groups. Specifically, we found that in-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the Q4 group, and there were variations in target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates, and other clinical outcomes. Some parameters, such as reinfarction rates and certain procedural outcomes, did not show significant differences among the groups. However, despite the differences, most of the patients achieved successful outcomes after PCI, with the best results in the low NLR group and the worst results in the high NLR group. Conclusion Higher NLR values were associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes during hospitalization.

A more-Comers populAtion trEated with an ultrathin struts polimer-free Sirolimus stent: an Italian post-maRketing study (the CAESAR registry).

The use of contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) has significantly improved outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, concerns exist regarding the long-term proinflammatory effects of durable polymer coatings used in most DES, potentially leading to long-term adverse events. First-generation polymer-free stent technologies, such as sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents (PF-SES), have shown an excellent safety and efficacy profile. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new ultrathin Coroflex ISAR NEO PF-SES, in a more-comers PCI population. The CAESAR (a more-Comers populAtion trEated with an ultrathin struts polimer-free Sirolimus stent: An Italian post-maRketing study) registry is a multicenter, prospective study conducted in Italy, enrolling more-comers CAD patients undergoing PCI with the Coroflex ISAR NEO stent. Patients with left main (LM) disease, cardiogenic shock (CS), or severely reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were excluded. The primary endpoint was target-lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. A total of 425 patients were enrolled at 13 centers (mean age 66.9 ± 11.6 years, Diabetes mellitus 29%, acute coronary syndrome 67%, chronic total occlusion 9%). Of these, 40.9% had multivessel disease (MVD) and in 3.3% cases, the target lesion was in-stent restenosis (ISR). Clinical device success was reached in 422 (99.6%) cases. At 1 year, only two (0.5%) subjects presented ischemia-driven TLR. The 1-year rates of target vessel revascularization and MACE were 0.5% and 5.1%, respectively. Major bleeding was observed in four (1.0%) patients. In this multicenter, prospective registry, the use of a new ultrathin Coroflex ISAR NEO PF-SES in a more-comers PCI population showed good safety and efficacy at 1 year.

Antiplatelet Resistance in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review examines the occurrence and implications of resistance to primary antiplatelet agents, aspirin and clopidogrel, often utilised in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), alongside the methodologies for assessment of such resistance. An extensive literature search across various databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL until May 2024 was conducted to identify studies evaluating antiplatelet resistance in on-pump and off-pump CABG patients. Following quality assessment, only high-quality studies were incorporated into this review. This review included 19 studies with 3,915 patients, four of which were randomised controlled trials and 15 were observational studies. Aspirin resistance incidence ranged from 11.0% to 51.5%, while clopidogrel resistance was 22%. Antiplatelet resistance, assessed through a wide variety of methods, was associated with a 13 times increase in the risk of vein graft occlusion and increased rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation in the case of clopidogrel resistance. The effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on antiplatelet resistance remains ambiguous. The academic literature lacks a standardised definition for antiplatelet resistance. Assessment methodologies greatly vary, leading to noninterchangeable outcomes. While aspirin resistance has a conflicting overall significant impact on adverse outcomes, clopidogrel resistance correlates with poorer clinical outcomes.

Comparison of outcomes of coronary artery stenting in acute myocardial infarction due to massive coronary thrombosis

Introduction. Therapy of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and massive coronary thrombosis (TTG 3) is a far from solved problem of modern medicine, since often in such patients immediate stent implantation is associated with the development of myocardial hypoperfusion, reducing the long-term prognosis of life.Aim. To evaluate short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of delayed and immediate coronary artery stenting techniques in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and massive coronary thrombosis.Material and methods. Comparative study in parallel groups, a total of 153 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and massive coronary thrombosis (TTG 3), 75 patients in the delayed coronary artery stenting group, 78 patients in the immediate coronary artery stenting group. In the immediate coronary artery stenting group, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in one stage with stent implantation, in the delayed coronary artery stenting group; percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in two stages: the first was achieving TIMI-3 blood flow using a minimally invasive mechanical strategy, the second was control coronary angiography 5-6 days and the decision on the implantation of the stent. The primary endpoint is: the rate of achieving optimal myocardial perfusion according to angiography, the secondary combined endpoint is the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events.Results. In the hospital period, optimal reperfusion (TIMI-3 and MBG 2-3) after the primary procedure was achieved in 88% in the delayed coronary artery stenting group and 69.2% of immediate coronary artery stenting with an advantage in the delayed coronary artery stenting group (p=0.005). Of the 75 patients in the delayed coronary artery stenting group, 38 patients (51%) did not receive a stent in the delayed period due to the insignificance of stenosis on the control coronary angiography. There was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events between the groups. In the long-term period, the median follow-up period was 47 months. The frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events was 13.3% in the delayed coronary artery stenting group and 23.1% in the immediate coronary artery stenting group, with a trend towards the advantage in the delayed coronary artery stenting group (p=0.1). Overall mortality (9.3% vs. 11.7%), recurrent myocardial infarction (2.6% vs. 5.1%), target vessel revascularization rate (1.3% vs. 6.4%) were without significant benefit. between subgroups.Conclusion. In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and massive coronary thrombosis, the use of delayed coronary artery stenting gives an advantage in achieving myocardial perfusion after the procedure, and demonstrates a tendency to reduce adverse cardiovascular events in the long-term period.

One year results of coronary bifurcation revascularization with the re-POT provisional sequential technique. The CABRIOLET registry

BackgroundRe-POT (proximal optimization technique (POT)) is a simple provisional sequential technique for percutaneous coronary bifurcation revascularization with better arterial geometry respect compared to classical techniques. Re-POT has demonstrated excellent mechanical and short-term clinical results. The multicenter CABRIOLET registry (NCT03550196) evaluate the long-term clinical benefit of the re-POT sequence in non-selected patients. MethodsAll consecutive patients presenting a coronary bifurcation lesion for which provisional stenting was indicated were included in 5 european centers. Re-POT strategy was systematically attempted. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), comprising cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months' follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint, all-cause death, target vessel failure (TVF) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Complex bifurcation was defined as Medina 0.1.1 or 1.1.1. ResultsA total of 500 patients aged 67.7 ± 11.7 years, 78.4% male, were included from 2015 to 2019, 174 of whom (34.8%) were considered having complex bifurcation lesions. Bifurcations involved the left main in 35.2% of cases. The full re-POT sequence was systematically performed in all cases. At 1 year, TLF was 2.0% (1.7% in complex vs. 2.1% in non-complex bifurcation; p = NS), and TLR was 1.6%, (1.1% vs. 1.8% respectively; p = NS). TVF and TVR rates were 3.2% and 2.8%. On multivariate analysis, only multivessel disease was predictive of TLF at 1 year (OR = 1.66 (1.09–2.53), p = 0.02). ConclusionsIn this large prospective all-comer registry, provisional stenting with re-POT technique appeared safe and effective at 1 year, without anatomical bifurcation restriction.

Effect of hemoglobin A1c management levels on coronary physiology evaluated by quantitative flow ratio in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

The coronary physiology and prognosis of patients with different hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different levels of HbA1c control on coronary physiology in patients who underwent PCI for coronary heart disease combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus by quantitative flow ratio (QFR). Patients who successfully underwent PCI and completed 1-year coronary angiographic follow up were enrolled, clinical data were collected, and QFR at immediate and 1-year follow up after PCI was retrospectively analyzed. A total of 257 patients (361 vessels) were finally enrolled and divided into the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)-compliance group (103 patients, 138 vessels) and non-HbA1c-compliance group (154 patients, 223 vessels) according to the HbA1c cut-off value of 7%. We compared the results of QFR analysis and clinical outcomes between the two groups. At 1-year follow up after PCI, the QFR was significantly higher (0.94 ± 0.07 vs 0.92 ± 0.10, P = 0.019) and declined less (0.014 ± 0.066 vs 0.033 ± 0.095, P = 0.029) in the HbA1c-compliance group. Meanwhile, the incidence of physiological restenosis was lower in the HbA1c-compliance group (2.9% vs 8.5%, P = 0.034). Additionally, the target vessel revascularization rate was lower in the HbA1c-compliance group (6.8% vs 16.9%, P = 0.018). Furthermore, HbA1c ≥7% (OR 2.113, 95% confidence interval 1.081-4.128, P = 0.029) and QFR decline (OR 2.215, 95% confidence interval 1.147-4.277, P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for target vessel revascularization. Patients with well-controlled HbA1c levels have better coronary physiological benefits and the incidence of adverse clinical outcome events might be reduced.

Outcomes of drug eluting stents vs. drug eluting balloons. A single center experience

Abstract Introduction Drug eluting stents (DES) are considered the default treatment option in the current era of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Nevertheless, the use of drug eluting balloons (DEB) remains highly relevant, especially in the setting of in stent restenosis (ISR), and de-novo small vessel disease or bifurcation lesions. Material and method Among 17,630 consecutive PCI procedures performed in our tertiary medical center between 2010 and 2021, we identified 16,435 procedures performed using DES and 1,195 using DEB. Endpoints included mortality and major adverse cardiac events [MACE: death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)] at 1 year. Propensity score matching was used to create a well-balanced cohort. Results and discussion: Mean age was similar (65.7±12.1 vs. 65.8±11.1, p=0.85), but less female patients (16.7% vs. 21.2%, p&amp;lt;0.01) were observed in the DEB group. DEB patients presented with higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and prior CABG (62.1% vs. 48.1%, 84.9% vs. 73.2% and 18.3% vs. 10.1% respectively, p&amp;lt;0.01 for all), as compared to DES patients. There were also higher rates of PCI for bifurcation lesions and in-stent restenosis (18.3% vs. 15.1% and 56.0% vs. 7.8% respectively, p&amp;lt;0.01 for both) in the DEB group. After propensity and adjustment for confounders, 370 matched pairs were compared. 1-year MACE rates were significantly higher (HR-1.51, 95%CI 1.04-2.18, p=0.03) in the DEB group, as compared to the DES group. This was driven by higher MI (6.8% vs. 1.9%, p&amp;lt;0.01), TVR (20.5% vs. 11.4%, p&amp;lt;0.01) and CABG (12.2% vs. 7.3%, p=0.02) rates in the DEB group. Adjusted rates of 1-year mortality (HR-1.20, 95%CI 0.75-1.67, p=0.45) did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions Treatment with DEB was associated with increased MACE at 1-year, driven by higher rates of MI, TVR and CABG, as compared to DES.Freedom from MACE

Abstract 12711: Stent Length as a Predictor of Target Vessel Revascularization in Patients Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents

Background: While several factors have been shown to increase the risk of stent thrombosis, most cases of target vessel revascularization (TVR) are due to in-stent restenosis (ISR) and have not been fully evaluated. Objectives: Our aims were to identify predictors of early and late TVR after drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation in a large prospective registry, focusing on stent length. Methods and Results: We analyzed rates of TVR according to stent length in a prospective registry of 14,447 all-comers treated with angioplasty and DES implantation in our institution. Patients were divided into quartiles according to stent length - mean 21mm - percentile 25 (Q1) 15mm, 50 (Q2) 18mm, 75 (Q3) 26mm and 100 (Q4) 32mm. At baseline patients had similar rates of diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients in the first quartile tend to be older, more commonly of female gender, with higher rates of GFR&lt;60, anemia, and unprotected LM angioplasty. At 4 years follow-up, rates of TVR and MACE were higher in patients with longer stents; 8.5%, 9.8%, 10.4% and 16.1% (p&lt;0.001) and 25.3%, 26.6%, 27% and 28.4% (p=0.031); for TVR and MACE in Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 groups of patients; respectively. There were no significant differences in the rates of all-cause death amongst patients in different quartiles. Furthermore, at multivariate Cox-regression analysis length of stent was found to be a significant independent predictor for TVR (OR 1.25 95.0% CI 1.11 - 1.42; p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: From the analysis of a large cohort of all-comer angioplasty patients who were treated with DES, stent length emerged as an independent predictor of TVR and MACE.

Abstract 17686: Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients at High Risk of Bleedings: A Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Among different coronary stents implanted in High Bleeding Risk (HBR) patients with an indication for short antiplatelet therapy, no comparisons in terms of efficacy have been provided. Methods: A Network Meta Analysis was performed including all Randomized Controlled Trials comparing different coronary stents evaluated in HBR patients. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs) as defined by each included trial were the primary end point, whereas TLR (target lesion revascularization), TVR (target vessel revascularization), stent thrombosis and total and major (BARC3-5) bleedings were the secondary ones. Results: A total of 4 studies (ONYX ONE, LEADERS FREE, SENIOR and HBR in BIO-RESORT) including 6637 patients were analyzed with different kind of stents and DAPT length (1 or 6 months) on 12 months follow-up. About one third of these patients were defined HBR due to indication for oral anticoagulation. All Drug Eluting Stents (DESs) reduced risk of MACE compared to Bare Metal Stents (BMSs) when followed by a 1-month DAPT. At SUCRA analysis, Orsiro was the device with the highest probability of performing best. Rates of TLR and TVR were significantly lower when using Resolute Onyx, Synergy and BioFreedom stents in comparison to BMS when followed by 1-month DAPT, with Synergy ranking best. Synergy also showed a significantly lower number of stent thrombosis compared to BMS (RR 0.28, 95%CI 0.06-0.93), while Orsiro and Resolute Integrity showed the highest probability of performing best. Conclusion: In HBRs patients, all DESs were superior to BMSs in terms of efficacy and safety. Among DESs, Orsiro was the one with the highest ranking in terms of MACE, mainly driven by a reduced incidence of repeated revascularization and stent thrombosis

Clinical and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions involving the ostial left circumflex coronary artery.

Percutaneous treatment for ostial left circumflex artery (LCx) lesions is known to be associated with suboptimal results. The present study aims to assess the procedural and long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo ostial LCx lesions overall and according to the coronary revascularization strategy. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with second generation drug eluting stents or drug coated balloons for de novo ostial LCx lesions in three high-volume Italian centers between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was target-vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 years. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause death, and repeat revascularization. A total of 366 patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 901 (IQR: 450-1728) days. 79.5% of the patients were male, 33.6% were diabetic, 49.7% had a previous PCI, and 23.1% a prior surgical revascularization. Very ostial LCx stenting was performed in 34.1%, crossover from left main to LCx in 17.3%, and a two-stent strategy in 48.6% of cases, respectively. In the overall population, the incidence of TVR at 2 years was 19.0% while MACCE rate was 25.7%. No major differences in clinical outcomes were found according to the stenting strategy. Use of intracoronary imaging was associated with fewer MACCE (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-1.13, p = 0.01), while the diameter of the stent implanted in the ostial LCx was associated with less TVR (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25-0.75, p = 0.002). Percutaneous revascularization of the ostial LCx is associated with a high rate of TVR, regardless of the stenting strategy. Intracoronary imaging and proper stent sizing may reduce the failure rates.

Early Outcomes of Interwoven Nitinol Wire Stent Placement versus Endarterectomy for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Disease of the Common Femoral Artery

PurposeTo compare the clinical outcomes of common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic disease treated with either surgical endarterectomy or an interwoven nitinol wire stent system. Materials and MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of all patients with chronic, de novo atherosclerotic CFA disease treated with surgical endarterectomy (CFAE) or stent placement between July 2019 and March 2022. Outcome measures assessed up to 12 months after procedure included clinical improvement, primary restenosis, target vessel revascularization (TVR), major adverse limb events (MALEs), and all-cause mortality. ResultsThirty-nine stents were deployed in 33 patients, and 56 CFAEs were performed in 55 patients. No differences were noted in the rate of primary patency (95.5% vs 94.4%, P = .618), TVR (2.9% vs 1.8%, P = .777), MALE (5.1% vs 5.4%, P = .949), and all-cause mortality (14.1% vs 3.6%, P = .076) between the stent and CFAE groups up to 12 months after procedure. There was greater improvement in median clinical severity in the stent group than in the CFAE group (Rutherford score change of 3.0 vs 1.5, P = .013). The median length of stay was less for the stent group (3 vs 7 days, P = .002), and there was a lower likelihood of severe or disabling adverse events in the stent group (0 vs 9 cases, P = .010). ConclusionsPatients treated with an interwoven nitinol wire stent had patency rates comparable to those treated with CFAE while having a lower incidence of severe adverse events and a shorter length of hospital stay than those who underwent CFAE.