Target sUA Research Articles

Limitations of the Current Standards of Care for Treating Gout and Crystal Deposition in the Primary Care Setting: A Review

PurposeThis article outlines several important issues regarding the management of patients with gout. The topics discussed include best practices for gout based on the most current guidelines, opportunities for improving gout management, and current and emerging therapies for gout. Methods[PubMed and Google Scholar databases] were search for all articles and trials published before 2016, using the key terms [hyperuricemia, gout, tophi, joint erosion, joint damage, treatment guidelines, American College of Rheumatology (ACR), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), flare, comorbidity, epidemiology, adherence, serum uric acid (sUA), monosodium urate (MSU), <6 mg/dL, MSU crystal formation, as well as individual drug names and classes of treatments of interest (allopurinol, febuxostat, colchicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs)]. Studies were selected that presented data on gout treatment, including drugs under development, and on the management of gout from both the physician and patient perspectives. The reference lists of identified articles were searched manually for additional publications. FindingsGout, a progressive debilitating form of inflammatory arthritis, is caused by factors that elevate serum uric acid (sUA) levels, leading to hyperuricemia. Continued elevated sUA can result in monosodium urate crystal deposition in joints and soft tissues, causing acute and chronic inflammation. Crystal deposition can lead to chronic gout, with an increased number of flares, tophi development, and structural joint damage. The aims of gout treatment are to reduce the sUA level to <6 mg/dL, to inhibit the formation of new crystals, and to promote the dissolution of existing crystals. Gout is often poorly managed for several reasons, including a lack of adherence to treatment guidelines by health care providers, patients’ poor adherence to therapy, and differences between a provider’s and patient’s perspectives regarding treatment. ImplicationsPatients need to be educated about their diagnosis and management of the disease, such as the importance of compliance with long-term treatment. Gout treatment may also confounded by contraindications to current standards of therapy and the limitations of current treatment paradigms. Recently approved medications, as well as drugs under development, may provide new ways for reaching the sUA target and also “curing” the disease.

Lesinurad in combination with allopurinol: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with gout with inadequate response to standard of care (the multinational CLEAR 2 study)

ObjectivesDetermine the efficacy and safety of daily lesinurad (200 or 400 mg orally) added to allopurinol in patients with serum uric acid (sUA) above target in a 12-month, randomised, phase...

Serum uric acid levels and the risk of flares among gout patients in a US managed care setting

Objective: Serum uric acid (sUA) levels are causally associated with the risk of gout flares. Our aim was to assess the magnitude of the association and time to first flare among patients in a managed care setting.Research design and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data from a large US health plan. Patients were required to have evidence of gout based on medical and pharmacy claims between January 2009 and April 2012. The 12 months prior to the index gout claim were used to assess baseline sUA levels; risk of gout flares, stratified by baseline sUA levels, was examined for 2 years post-index. Risk of flare was modeled with Cox proportional hazards; time to first flare was assessed by Kaplan–Meier.Results: We identified 18,008 patients with gout and available baseline SUA levels (mg/dL). The hazard ratios for the risk of gout flares compared with sUA <5.0 were: 1.17 for sUA 5.0 to <6.0; 1.69 for sUA 6.0 to <7.0; 2.16 for sUA 7.0 to <8.0; 2.87 for sUA 8.0 to <9.0; and 3.85 for sUA ≥9.0 (all p < .001 except for sUA 5.0 to <6.0 cohort). The time to first flare was shorter for cohorts with higher baseline sUA levels.Conclusion: These findings confirm that higher sUA levels are associated with an increased risk of gout flares in a dose–response manner over 2 years. This data supports the need to treat to sUA target levels as recommended by recent gout care guidelines. Claims-based algorithms were used to identify gout flares; although this would not be expected to influence estimates of risk by sUA level, there may have been over- or under-estimation of the incidence of flares.

The Budget Impact of Increased Use of Febuxostat in the Management of Gout: A US Health Plan Managed Care Pharmacy and Medical Costs Perspective

PurposeGout is a chronic disease characterized by the deposition of urate crystals in the joints and throughout the body, caused by an excess burden of serum uric acid (sUA). The study estimates pharmacy and medical cost budgetary impacts of wider adoption by US payers of febuxostat, a urate-lowering therapy (ULT) for the treatment of gout. MethodsA US payer-perspective budget impact model followed ULT patients from a 1,000,000-member plan over 3 years. The current market share scenario, febuxostat (6%) and ULT allopurinol (94%), was compared with an 18% febuxostat market share. Data were implemented from randomized controlled trials, census and epidemiologic studies, and real-world database analyses. An innovation was the inclusion of gout-related chronic kidney disease costs. Cost results were estimated as annual and cumulative incremental costs, expressed as total costs, cost per member per month, and cost per treated member per month. Clinical results were also estimated. FindingsIncreasing the febuxostat market share resulted in a 6.3% increase in patients achieving the sUA target level of <6.0 mg/dL and a 1.4% reduction in gout flares during the 3-year period. Total cost increased 1.4%, with a 49.9% increase in ULT costs, a 1.4% reduction in flare costs, a 1.2% reduction in chronic kidney disease costs, and a 2.8% reduction in gout care costs. The cumulative incremental costs were $1,307,425 in the first year, $1,939,016 through the second year, and $2,092,744 through the third year. By the third year, savings in medical costs offset most of the increase in treatment costs. Impacts on cumulative cost per member per month and cumulative cost per treated member per month followed the same pattern, with the highest impact in the first year and cumulative impacts declining during the 3-year period. The cumulative cost per member per month impact was estimated as $0.109, $0.081, and $0.058 and the cumulative cost per treated member per month impact was estimated as $12.416, $9.207, and $6.625 in the first year, through the second year, and through the third year, respectively. ImplicationsExpanding the febuxostat market share would result in improved clinical outcomes, but with an overall increase in costs over 3 years due to higher costs of treatment. By the third year, savings in medical costs, primarily in chronic kidney disease costs, would offset most of the increase in treatment costs. Expanded use of febuxostat in the treatment of all gout patients, independent of renal impairment status, should be considered based on improved clinical outcomes and longer-term medical cost savings associated with these improved outcomes.

Lesinurad: First Global Approval.

Lesinurad (ZURAMPIC(®)) is an oral urate-anion exchanger transporter 1 (URAT1) inhibitor developed by Ardea Biosciences (a subsidiary of AstraZeneca) for the treatment of hyperuricaemia associated with gout. It reduces serum uric acid (sUA) levels by inhibiting the function of the transporter proteins (URAT1 and organic anion transporter 4) involved in uric acid reabsorption in the kidney. In December 2015, lesinurad was approved in the USA as combination therapy with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor for the treatment of hyperuricaemia associated with gout in patients who have not achieved sUA target levels with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor alone. Lesinurad has also received a positive opinion from the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use for this indication and is in phase III development as a combination therapy in several other countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of lesinurad leading to this first approval for hyperuricaemia associated with gout.

A Pharmacist-Staffed, Virtual Gout Management Clinic for Achieving Target Serum Uric Acid Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Relatively few patients with gout receive appropriate treatment. To determine whether a pharmacist-staffed gout management program is more effective than usual care in achieving target serum uric acid (sUA) levels in gout patients. A parallel-group, randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist-staffed, telephone-based program for managing hyperuricemia vs usual care. Trial duration was 26 weeks. Primary outcome measure was achieving sUA levels at or below 6 mg/dL at the 26-week visit. Secondary outcome was mean change in sUA levels in the control and intervention groups. Participants were adults with recurrent gout and sUA levels above 6.0 mg/dL. Participants were randomly assigned to management by a clinical pharmacist following protocol or to monitoring of sUA levels but management of their gout by their usual treating physician. Of 102 patients who met eligibility criteria, 77 subjects obtained a baseline sUA measurement and were entered into the trial. Among 37 participants in the intervention group, 13 (35%) had sUA levels at or below 6.0 mg/dL at 26 weeks, compared with 5 (13%) of 40 participants in the control group (risk ratio = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 7.1, p = 0.03). The mean change in sUA levels among controls was +0.1 mg/dL compared with -1.5 mg/dL in the intervention group (sUA difference = -1.6, 95% CI = -0.9 to -2.4, p < 0.001). A structured pharmacist-staffed program was more effective than usual care for achieving target sUA levels. These results suggest a structured program could greatly improve gout management.

Febuxostat in the management of gout: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Objective:To determine the cost-effectiveness of febuxostat vs allopurinol for the management of gout.Methods:A stochastic microsimulation cost-effectiveness model with a US private-payer perspective and 5-year time horizon was developed. Model flow based on guideline and real-world treatment paradigms incorporated gout flare, serum uric acid (sUA) testing, treatment titration, discontinuation, and adverse events, chronic kidney disease (CKD) incidence and progression, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence. Outcomes were estimated for the general gout population and for gout patients with CKD stages 3/4. Modeled treatment interventions were daily oral febuxostat 40–80 mg and allopurinol 100–300 mg. Baseline patient characteristics were taken from epidemiologic studies, efficacy data from randomized controlled trials, adverse event rates from package inserts, and costs from the literature, government sources, and expert opinion. Eight clinically-relevant incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated: per patient reaching target sUA, per flare avoided, per CKD incidence, progression, stages 3/4 progression, and stage 5 progression avoided, per incident T2DM avoided, and per death avoided.Results:Five-year incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the general gout population were $5377 per patient reaching target sUA, $1773 per flare avoided, $221,795 per incident CKD avoided, $29,063 per CKD progression avoided, $36,018 per progression to CKD 3/4 avoided, $71,426 per progression to CKD 5 avoided, $214,277 per incident T2DM avoided, and $217,971 per death avoided. In patients with CKD 3/4, febuxostat dominated allopurinol for all cost-effectiveness outcome measures.Conclusions:Febuxostat may be a cost-effective alternative to allopurinol, especially for patients with CKD stages 3 or 4.

An open-label, 6-month study of allopurinol safety in gout: The LASSO study

ObjectivesAllopurinol is the most widely prescribed serum uric acid-lowering therapy (ULT) in gout. To achieve serum uric acid (sUA) concentrations associated with clinical benefit, allopurinol is serially uptitrated with sUA monitoring. Suboptimal dosing is a key contributor to poor clinical outcomes, but few data are available on the safety and efficacy of dose-titrated allopurinol, particularly at doses >300mg/d. The objective of this open-label study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of allopurinol under conditions where investigators were encouraged to titrate to optimal, medically appropriate doses. MethodsLong-term Allopurinol Safety Study Evaluating Outcomes in Gout Patients (LASSO) was a large, 6-month, multicenter study of allopurinol (NCT01391325). Adults meeting American Rheumatism Association Criteria for Classification of Acute Arthritis of Primary Gout and ≥2 gout flares in the previous year were eligible. Investigators were encouraged (but not required) to titrate allopurinol doses to achieve target sUA < 6.0mg/dL. The primary objective was evaluation of the safety of dose-titrated allopurinol by clinical and laboratory examinations at monthly visits. Secondary objectives included sUA-lowering efficacy and gout flare frequency. ResultsOf 1735 patients enrolled, 1732 received ≥1 allopurinol doses. The maximal daily allopurinol dose during study was <300mg in 14.4%, 300mg in 65.4%, and >300mg in 20.2% of patients; dosing duration was 115.5, 152.0, and 159.7 days, respectively. Overall, baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidity rates were similar across these three categories, but patients receiving >300-mg maximal dose had more severe gout. Treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to allopurinol occurred in 15.2%, 9.5%, and 11.4% of patients in the <300-, 300-, and >300-mg categories, respectively. Rash incidence was low (1.5%) and allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome was not reported. No clinically meaningful changes occurred in laboratory values. sUA < 6.0mg/dL at month 6 was achieved by 35.9% of patients overall: 22.4%, 35.0%, and 48.3% in dosing categories <300, 300, and >300mg, respectively. ConclusionsThis large multicenter study found that the allopurinol dose-titration strategy was well tolerated, without new safety signals emerging over 6 months. However, despite encouragement to treat to target, significant proportions of patients did not achieve target sUA.

Febuxostat: a review of its use in the treatment of hyperuricaemia in patients with gout.

Febuxostat (Adenuric(®), Uloric(®), Feburic(®)) is an orally-active, potent, non-purine, selective xanthine oxidase inhibitor. In the EU, it is indicated in adults for the treatment of chronic hyperuricaemia in conditions where urate deposition has already occurred. Unlike allopurinol, the prototypical xanthine oxidase inhibitor that is the cornerstone therapy for chronic gout, febuxostat does not require dosage adjustment in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. In randomized, double-blind studies, 6-12months' treatment with febuxostat at dosages approved for use in the EU (80 and 120mg/day) was significantly more effective in lowering serum uric acid (sUA) levels in patients with hyperuricaemia and gout than allopurinol at dosages commonly prescribed in practice (100-300mg/day); febuxostat demonstrated greater urate-lowering efficacy than allopurinol in patients with renal impairment. In open-label extension studies, 3-5years' treatment with febuxostat maintained a target sUA level of <6.0mg/dL in most patients; sustained reduction in sUA level was associated with near elimination of gout flares and improved tophus status. Febuxostat therapy was generally well tolerated during clinical development; frequently reported adverse events included liver function abnormalities, diarrhoea and rash. Cardiovascular (CV) events were the most common serious adverse events; the comparative safety of febuxostat and allopurinol is being examined further in large, ongoing trials in patients with gout who already have, or are at risk of developing, CV disease. In conclusion, febuxostat is a well established antihyperuricaemic agent that provides an effective alternative to allopurinol for the management of chronic gout.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in the Treatment of Hyperuricemia: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the relative urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat and allopurinol in hyperuricemic patients with or without gout. Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol or placebo in hyperuricemic patients with/without gout were included in this Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results. Eight RCTs including 4,099 patients met the inclusion criteria. The number of subjects achieving a serum urate (sUA) level ＜6.0 mg/dL was significantly higher in the febuxostat 120 mg and 80 mg groups than in the allopurinol (100 to 300 mg) group (odds ratio [OR] 7.17, 95% credible interval [CrI] 3.86 to 14.09; OR 3.49, 95% CrI 1.97 to 5.91, respectively). However, achievement of the target sUA level was comparable between febuxostat 40 mg and allopurinol. Ranking probability based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that febuxostat 120 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the target sUA (SUCRA=0.9973), followed by febuxostat 80 mg (SUCRA=0.752), febuxostat 40 mg (SUCRA=0.4289), allopurinol (SUCRA=0.3217), and placebo (SUCRA=0). In contrast, no significant difference in safety based on the number of withdrawals due to adverse events was observed among the 5 interventions. Conclusion. Febuxostat 80 mg and 120 mg were more efficacious than allopurinol (100 to 300 mg), and febuxostat 40 mg and allopurinol were comparable in urate-lowering efficacy. The safety of febuxostat at all doses was comparable with that of allopurinol. (J Rheum Dis 2015;22:356-365)

Safety, efficacy and renal effect of febuxostat in patients with moderate-to-severe kidney dysfunction.

Hyperuricemia (HU) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and accumulating evidence suggests it has a pathogenic role in the progression of the disease. However, a major challenge in treating patients with HU is the adverse effects caused by urate-lowering drugs used to treat CKD. Because of these untoward effects, doses need to be reduced, which leads to suboptimal efficacy. Febuxostat has been shown to be highly efficacious in reducing serum uric acid (sUA) and is well tolerated in patients with mild kidney dysfunction. However, its safety and efficacy have not been well studied in more advanced cases of CKD. We studied the safety and efficacy of escalating doses of febuxostat over a 24-week period in 70 patients with CKD stages 3b, 4 and 5, and we also observed the changes in blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria following the reduction of sUA. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in only 5 out of 70 patients. All but one of the events were mild, and all five patients fully recovered. By 24 weeks, the reduction of sUA levels was >40% in CKD stage 3b and >50% in CKD stages 4 and 5. More than 70% of patients achieved target sUA levels of 6 mg dl(-1) or less. Multivariate analysis showed that a greater reduction in sUA with febuxostat was associated with an increase in eGFR and a tendency toward decreased proteinuria. Febuxostat was safe and efficacious in the treatment of CKD stages 3b-5.

THU0581-HPR Effectiveness of A Rheumatology Nurse Follow up Programme in Achieving the Desired Target Serum Urate Levels for Patients with Gouty Arthritis

BackgroundUrate lowering therapy (ULT) can effectively reduce serum urate level (SUA) and flares for gout, thereby minimizing progressive joint damage. Despite advances in therapies for gout and the publication of...

Questionnaire survey evaluating disease-related knowledge for 149 primary gout patients and 184 doctors in South China

This study aims to investigate the disease-related knowledge of gout patients and doctors in south China and to identify the important targets of education for patients and doctors. A cross-section survey of 154 primary gout patients and 185 doctors who may see gout patients was conducted with a modified questionnaire with ten items of gout-related knowledge. The participants were considered to have gout-related knowledge if he or she correctly answered seven or more items. One hundred and forty-nine valid questionnaires from patients, 33 from rheumatology physicians, and 151 from non-rheumatology doctors were collected for statistical analysis. The mean correctly answered items of three groups were 6.6 ± 2.2, 9.6 ± 0.53, and 8.0 ± 1.4, with rate of being considered to have knowledge about gout 51.7, 100, and 90.1 %, respectively (P < 0.05). The correct answer rate for each particular item was over 80 % in the rheumatology physician group. Patients or non-rheumatology doctors knew the optimal serum uric acid (sUA) level (48.3 vs 55.6 %), the need to take lifelong urate-lowering drugs (29.5 vs 43.6 %), that allopurinol is a urate-lowering drug (55.7 vs 76.0 %), and how to prevent attacks induced by urate-lowering therapy (ULT) (60.4 vs 74.0 %). Logistic regression showed that higher education predicted which patients had gout-related knowledge. Both the gout patients and non-rheumatology doctors in south China had poor knowledge on ULT. Since many gout patients do not see rheumatologists, our data suggest that further education should focus on patients and non-rheumatologists and emphasize the use of urate-lowering drugs, treatment duration, the target sUA level, and prophylaxis against acute attacks.

FRI0397 Adherence to EULAR recommendations for the treatment of GOUT

BackgroundGout is a relatively common condition with low adherence to urate-lowering therapy (ULT) which leads to frequent flares and disability. To improve patient care the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)...

SAT0383 High Dose Allopurinol in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK

BackgroundAllopurinol is the most commonly used urate lowering therapy in the world. Although allopurinol is EMEA authorized for up to 900 mg per day, the majority of patients receive 300...

AB1410 Questionnaire survey for disease-related knowledge level in 149 gout patients in south china

BackgroundThe prevalence of gout in China has been increasing to as high as 15% in some reports in the past 2 decades. Optimal management including patient education has been emphasized...

THU0454 Questionnaire survey for gout-related knowledge level in 185 chinese physicians

BackgroundOur previous survey found that gout patients in south China have poor knowledge on urate-lowering therapy (ULT). Physicians are the main provider of disease knowledge for patients but few reports...

FRI0371 Characteristics of gout patients in france: The “cactus” study

BackgroundThere was little recent information in France concerning gout patients despite data from other countries supporting increasing disease prevalence due to dietary and lifestyle changes, and increased longevity of populations.ObjectivesThe...

SAT0384 Patients that Continue to Flare Despite Reaching Eular/ ACR Recommended Serum Urate Target

BackgroundGout is a common inflammatory arthritis and its worldwide prevalence is increasing. EULAR and ACR Guidelines recommend a target serum urate (sUA) ≤ 6 mg/dL. For patients with significant crystal...

FRI0383 Majority of us patients would not meet the proposed acr gout treatment guideline goal of SUA

BackgroundAlthough gout is a relatively common condition, treatment is often not ideal with many patients continuing to experience multiple flares and some developing complications associated with the disease. To improve...