TOPIC: Obstructive Lung Diseases TYPE: Original Investigations PURPOSE: 15 million Americans are estimated to be eligible for CT lung cancer screening (CTLS) based on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Patients who qualify for CTLS are at high-risk for numerous cardio-pulmonary co-morbidities including emphysema.Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been shown to provide a mortality benefit in a subset of subjects with upper-lobe emphysema and reduced exercise capacity. Due to the morbidity of the surgical procedure it has not achieved widespread use. Now minimally-invasive forms of LVR (bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, BLVR) with endobronchial valves (EBV) wiht placement of one-way EBVs induces atelectasis of emphysematous areas blocked by the valve and redirects airflow to more normal lung. BLVR has been shown to provide benefit in both upper and lower lobe disease in both heterogenous and homogeneous emphysema, provided there is no collateral ventilation (CV) in the target lobe. Qualifying criteria for BLVR includes FEV1 <45% pred., DLCO > 20% pred., TLC > 100% pred., RV > 175% pred. ( in some cases RV > 150%), (≥200% pred. for homogeneous) and BMI < 35. Fissure integrity of approximately 80% on CT predicts the likelihood of absence of CV and likely clinical benefit of BLVR, although CV should be ruled out through a physiological assessment. CTLS may help identify patients who could clinically benefit from BLVR or LVRS. METHODS: This restrospective, single-center study assessed all baseline CTLS exams performed from January 1, 2012 through September 30, 2017. All patients met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Lung Cancer Screening Version 1.2012 high-risk criteria for lung cancer screening. All analysis was performed utilizing a lung analysis software on IntelliSpace Portal 9.0 (CT COPD, Phillips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH USA). Four research assistants blinded to outcomes data performed the analysis and reviewed the multiplanar images and corrected any errors in interlobar segmentation. Attenuation of each voxel within segmented lungs was calculated automatically. Emphysema destruction was calculated as the sum of voxels with attenuation below -950 Hounsfield units (HU). RESULTS: A total of 4673 patients were included in the study. Quantitative global and lobar emphysema scores were obtained on 4495 patients ( 96.2%). A majority of patients 2845 ( 60.9%) had less than 1% emphysema destruction, 1207 ( 25.8%) had between 1-5%, 235 ( 5.0%) between 5-10% and 208 (4.5%) greater than 10%. In our cohort 124 patients (59.6%) with global % LAA ( low attenuation area) -950> 10% had heterogeneous disease defined as a delta of 15% LAA between ipsilateral lobes. There were 182 patients ( 3.9%) who had at least one lobe with at least 20% lung destruction ( %LAA -950> 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic use of quantitative emphysema CT assessment in a lung cancer screening population was able to identify approximately 4% of the lung screening population who may benefit from further evaluation for candidacy for bronchoscopic or surgical lung volume reduction. Further work is needed to compare and standardize the various commercially available quantitative CT algorithms with low dose CT to better incorporate this information with clinical selection pathways for lung volume reduction. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Quantitative CT Assessment may be a potential screening tool in the lung screening CT population for candidacy of bronchoscopic or surgical lung volume reduction. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Effie Adjei, source=Web Response Grant funding relationship with Genentech Please note: 9/10/2020 Added 04/23/2021 by Lee Gazourian, source=Web Response, value=Grant/Research Support No relevant relationships by Susan Kim, source=Web Response Consultant relationship with Veracyte Please note: 2019-2021 Added 06/23/2021 by Carla Lamb, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Covidien Please note: $1001 - $5000 by andrea mckee, source=Web Response, value=Salary Speaker/Speaker's Bureau relationship with Covidien Please note: $1-$1000 by andrea mckee, source=Web Response, value=Travel Advisor relationship with AstraZeneca Please note: 2019-2021 Added 04/22/2021 by Brady McKee, source=Web Response, value=Advisor Fee No relevant relationships by Timothy MD, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Elizabeth Pagura, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Julia Rabazzi, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Shawn Regis, source=Web Responseresearch relationship with Veracyte Please note: 1/1/18-present Added 06/23/2021 by Kimberly Rieger-Christ, source=Web Response, value=Grant/Research Support No relevant relationships by William Thedinger, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Christoph Wald, source=Web Response, value=Honoraria Removed 04/22/2021 by Christoph Wald, source=Web Response
Read full abstract