Target-controlled Infusion Research Articles

Design of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for administration of low dose peripheral norepinephrine during general anaesthesia.

Intraoperative hypotension is a risk factor for kidney, heart and cognitive postoperative complications. Literature suggests that the use of low-dose peripheral norepinephrine (NOR) reduces organ dysfunction, yet its administration remains unstandardized. In this work we develop a pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model of NOR and its effect on mean arterial pressure (MAP). From June 2018 to December 2021, we included patients scheduled for elective neurosurgery and requiring vasopressors for intraoperative hypotension management at Lariboisière Hospital, Paris. Low doses of NOR were administered peripherally, and successive arterial blood samples were collected to track its plasmatic concentration. We used a compartmental modelling approach for NOR PK. We developed and compared 2 models for NOR PD on MAP. Model comparison was done using Bayes information criteria. The resulting PK/PD model parameters were fitted over the entire population and linked to age, weight, height and sex. We included 29 patients (age 52 [46-64] years, 69% female). NOR median time to peak effect on MAP was 74 [53-94] s. After bolus administration, MAP increased by 24% (15-31%). A 2-comparment model with depot best captured NOR PK. NOR PD effect on MAP was well represented by both Emax and Windkessel models, with better results for the former. We found that age, height and weight as well as history of smoking and hypertension were correlated with model parameters. We have developed a PK/PD model to accurately track norepinephrine plasma concentration and its effect on MAP over time, which could serve for target-controlled infusion.

Study of Two Sedative Protocols for Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Propofol versus Propofol-Remifentanil Combination, Delivered in Target-Controlled Infusion Mode.

Background and Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep-disordered breathing pathology with significant clinical consequences, including increased cardiovascular risk and cognitive decline. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold-standard treatment, but alternative strategies are sometimes needed for patients intolerant to CPAP. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a key diagnostic tool for assessing upper airway obstruction in OSA patients and subsequently tailoring a surgical approach, with sedation protocols playing a crucial role in its efficacy and results accuracy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of adding remifentanil to a propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) regimen on the sedation parameters and procedural outcomes of DISE. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at the Central University and Emergency Military Hospital "Dr. Carol Davila" and Ria Clinic in Bucharest between July 2021 and October 2023. Thirty-one patients were enrolled and randomised into two groups: a propofol group (P group, n= 11) and a remifentanil-propofol group (R-P group, n = 20). DISE was performed using standardised protocols, sedative drugs were administered in TCI mode, and data on sedation levels, respiratory and cardiovascular parameters, and procedural incidents were collected. Results: The addition of remifentanil at 1 ng/mL effect-site concentration significantly reduced the effect-site concentration of propofol required for adequate sedation (3.4 ± 0.7 µg/mL in the P group vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 µg/mL in the R-P group, p = 0.035). The time to achieve adequate sedation was also shorter in the R-P group (7.1 ± 2.5 min vs. 9.5 ± 2.7 min, p = 0.017). The incidence of cough, hypoxemia, and cardiovascular events did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Adding remifentanil to a propofol TCI regimen for DISE effectively reduces the required propofol effect-site concentration and shortens sedation time without increasing the risk of adverse events. This combination may enhance the safety and efficiency of DISE, offering a promising alternative for patients undergoing this procedure.

Potential increased propofol sensitivity in cognitively impaired elderly: a controlled, double-blind study.

Cognitive impairment in the elderly may lead to potential increased sensitivity to anesthetic agents targeting receptors associated with cognition. This study aimed to explore the effect of cognitive status on propofol consumption during surgery in elderly patients. Sixty elderly patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were allocated to either a cognitively normal [CogN, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥26] or cognitively impaired (CogI, MoCA <26) group. Propofol was administered via target-controlled infusion to maintain a bispectral index (BIS) between 55-65 during surgery. Propofol consumption was recorded at three time points: T1 (abolished eyelash reflex), T2 (BIS = 50), T3 (extubation). BIS values at eyelash reflex abolition were also recorded. Postoperative MoCA, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and remifentanil/sufentanil consumption were assessed. BIS values before induction were similar between CogN and CogI groups. However, at eyelash reflex abolition, BIS was significantly higher in CogI than CogN (mean ± SD: 65.3 ± 7.2 vs. 61.1 ± 6.8, p = 0.031). Propofol requirement to reach BIS 50 was lower in CogI vs. CogN (1.24 ± 0.19 mg/kg vs. 1.46 ± 0.12 mg/kg, p = 0.003). Postoperative MoCA, VAS scores, and remifentanil/sufentanil consumption did not differ significantly between groups. Compared to cognitively intact elderly, those with cognitive impairment exhibited higher BIS at eyelash reflex abolition and required lower propofol doses to achieve the same BIS level, suggesting increased propofol sensitivity. Cognitive status may impact anesthetic medication requirements in the elderly.

Effects of different doses of alfentanil combined with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy

BackgroundDaytime hysteroscopy requires anesthesia that offers rapid onset and clearance, with minimal respiratory and cardiovascular suppression. This study compared the effects of different doses of alfentanil combined with propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) for such procedures. MethodsWe randomized 240 patients undergoing daytime hysteroscopy into three groups to receive alfentanil at doses of 5 μg/kg, 10 μg/kg, and 15 μg/kg, combined with propofol TCI. We meticulously recorded complications and perioperative vitals to evaluate the safety and efficacy of each dosage regimen. ResultsThe 10 μg/kg dose of alfentanil, used in conjunction with propofol, required lower propofol dosages and resulted in quicker recovery time and fewer intraoperative movements. However, higher doses of 15 μg/kg led to a significant increase in hypoxemia and instability in hemodynamics and oxygenation. ConclusionCombining alfentanil at 10 μg/kg with propofol TCI for daytime hysteroscopy results in high effectiveness. A lower incidence of complications, a reduced propofol requirement, and rapid emergence from sedation characterize this regimen.

Determining the Target Concentration of Propofol for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Target-Controlled Infusion Approach.

Introduction Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is vital for diagnosing and treating biliary and pancreatic diseases, necessitating deep sedation typically achieved through total intravenous anesthesia. Propofol, with its favorable pharmacokinetic profile, is the preferred sedative, but conventional administration methods of mg/kg boluses or infusion rates pose challenges. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems offer a solution that ensures precise dose delivery of propofol. Despite its widespread use, the literature lacks specific guidance on the target plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol for sedation in patients undergoing ERCP. Methods A prospective interventional study was conducted at the Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Delhi, India to determine the target Cp of propofol for sedation during ERCP. The study enrolled 86 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II patients aged 18-70 years. The primary objective was to establish the optimal propofol concentration for sedation as guided by a bispectral index (BIS) value of 60-70. Secondary outcomes included induction time, recovery time, total propofol consumption, and the occurrence of adverse events (if any). The Marsh pharmacokinetic model guided the TCI pump, adjusting Cp until the target sedation was achieved. Results The mean Cp of propofol to maintain the BIS value 60-70 was 2.21 ± 0.42 µg/ml. Age-wise analysis revealed variations, emphasizing the need for individualized dosing. Induction time was 4.21 ± 0.68 minutes; recovery times were seven minutes (median, IQR: 5-10 minutes) for BIS >80 and seven minutes (median, IQR: 5-10 minutes) for achieving a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score of ≥5. The mean propofol consumption was 6.24 mg/kg/hr. Side effects were minimal, with 1.16% experiencing transient hypoxia and hypotension. Conclusion The study establishes a mean target propofol concentration of 2.21 ± 0.42 µg/ml for sedation in ASA I and II patients undergoing ERCP.

Comparative Effects of Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol Versus Spinal and Thiopental-Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Lipid Peroxidation in Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Open-Label Study.

During pregnancy, physiological changes can increase oxidative stress (OS) in both mothers and fetuses. The use of anesthesia for cesarean sections (CSs) could exacerbate this stress due to its impact on the ischemia-reperfusion effect. Our study aimed to explore the effects of target-controlled infusion of propofol on OS during CSs, and to compare these effects with those of spinal and thiopental-sevoflurane anesthesia. The study included ninety parturients undergoing elective CS, allocated into three groups: Group S (spinal) (n = 30), Group P (propofol) (n = 30), and Group TS (thiopental-sevoflurane) (n = 30). Venous blood samples were taken from mothers at three time points, before, during, and after surgery, and one sample was taken from the umbilical vein after delivery. Blood samples were analyzed with the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay and blood gas analysis. A statistical comparison between groups was obtained by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Wilcoxon test where appropriate. Levels of TBARS after the induction of anesthesia were lower in all groups compared to values preoperatively. In Group P, TBARS levels started to decrease in the first five minutes after the induction (1.90 ± 0.47; P < 0.001) and had significantly lower values compared to Group S (2.22 ± 0.21) and Group TS (2.40 ± 0.20). Two hours after surgery, TBARS values were the lowest in Group P (1.76 ± 0.15, P<0.001), compared to Group S (2.18 ± 0.24) and Group TS (2.41 ± 0.21). TBARS value in umbilical venous blood was significantly lower in Group P (1.56 ± 0.16, P < 0.001) compared to Group S (2.18 ± 0.17) and Group TS (2.09 ± 0.09). Umbilical cord venous blood gas values (pH, PCO2, HCO3, lactates, and base excess (BE)) were not different between the groups, except for PO2, which was significantly lower in Group S (20.5 ± 5.0; P < 0.001) compared to Group P (36.5 ± 19.2) and Group TS (33.5 ± 10.1). Target-controlled infusion of propofol anesthesia could beadvantageous for parturients with compromised oxidative status, especially those undergoing emergency CSs when general anesthesia is required.

Effective bolus dose of remimazolam for i-gel® insertion in nonparalyzed patients: a dose-finding study

PurposeRemimazolam is a recently developed ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine used for anesthesia induction and maintenance. Nevertheless, the effective bolus dose of remimazolam for i-gel® (Intersurgical Ltd., Wokingham, Berkshire, UK) insertion without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) has not been well established.MethodsThis study included 25 adult patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia who were eligible for i-gel use. Anesthesia was induced with predetermined bolus doses of remimazolam, starting at 0.3 mg·kg−1 for the first patient, without the use of NMBAs. All patients concurrently received remifentanil using target-controlled infusion (TCI) at a fixed effect-site concentration (Ce) of 3.0 ng·mL−1. Insertion of the i-gel was attempted 90 sec after remimazolam administration, and insertion conditions were assessed. Subsequent doses of remimazolam were decreased or increased by 0.05 mg·kg−1, depending on the success or failure of i-gel insertion.ResultsThe mean (standard deviation) 50% effective dose (ED50) of a remimazolam bolus for successful i-gel insertion as determined by the modified Dixon’s up-and-down method was 0.100 (0.027) mg·kg−1. The ED50 and ED95 estimated by isotonic regression were 0.111 (83% confidence interval [CI], 0.096 to 0.131) mg·kg−1 and 0.182 (95% CI, 0.144 to 0.195) mg·kg−1, respectively. None of the patients required treatment for hypotension or bradycardia during anesthesia induction.ConclusionBased on the ED95 of remimazolam bolus dose determined in our study, we recommend using 0.182 mg·kg−1 of remimazolam in combination with remifentanil TCI at a Ce of 3.0 ng·mL−1 for successful i-gel insertion without NMBAs in adult patients. This regimen seems effective with a low risk of hemodynamic instability during anesthesia induction.Study registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05298228); first submitted 6 March 2022.

Comparison of arterial hypotension incidence during general anesthesia induction – target-controlled infusion vs. bolus injection of propofol: a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundThe incidence of arterial hypotension during induction of general anesthesia is influenced by the method of propofol administration, but there is a dearth of randomized clinical trials comparing bolus injection and target-controlled infusion in relation to arterial hypotension. This study seeks to compare the incidence of arterial hypotension between these two methods of propofol administration. MethodsThis prospective, randomized, single-center, non-blinded study included 60 patients (aged 35 to 55 years), classified as ASA physical status I or II, who were undergoing non-cardiac surgeries. They were randomly allocated using a computer to two groups based on the method of propofol administration during the induction of general anesthesia: the Target Group, receiving target-controlled infusion at 4 μg.mL−1, and the Bolus Group, receiving a bolus infusion of 2 mg.kg−1. Both groups also received midazolam 2 mg, fentanyl 3 μg.kg−1, and rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg−1. Over the first 10 minutes of anesthesia induction, Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Heart Rate (HR), level of Consciousness (qCON), and Suppression Rate (SR) were recorded every 2 minutes. ResultsTwenty-seven patients remained in the TCI group, while 28 were in the Bolus group. Repeated measure analysis using mixed-effects models could not reject the null hypothesis for the effect of group-time interactions in MAP (p = 0.85), HR (p = 0.49), SR (p = 0.44), or qCON (p = 0.72). The difference in means for qCON (60.2 for TCI, 50.5 for bolus, p < 0.001), MAP (90.3 for TCI, 86.2 for bolus, p < 0.006), HR (76.2 for TCI, 76.9 for bolus, p = 0.93), and SR (0.01 for TCI, 5.5 for bolus, p < 0.001), irrespective of time (whole period means), revealed some significant differences. ConclusionPatients who received propofol bolus injection exhibited a lower mean arterial pressure, a greater variation in the level of consciousness, and a higher suppression rate compared to those who received it as a target-controlled infusion. However, the interaction effect between groups and time remains inconclusive.

Comparison of effects of sufentanil and fentanyl target-controlled infusion on quality of awakening from anesthesia, intrapulmonary oxygenation, and oxidative-antioxidant system in patients undergoing radical surgery for colorectal cancer

Comparison of effects of sufentanil and fentanyl target-controlled infusion on quality of awakening from anesthesia, intrapulmonary oxygenation, and oxidative-antioxidant system in patients undergoing radical surgery for colorectal cancer

Daytime dexmedetomidine sedation with closed-loop acoustic stimulation alters slow wave sleep homeostasis in healthy adults

BackgroundThe alpha-2 adrenergic agonist dexmedetomidine induces EEG patterns resembling those of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Fulfilment of slow wave sleep (SWS) homeostatic needs would address the assumption that dexmedetomidine induces functional biomimetic sleep states. MethodsIn-home sleep EEG recordings were obtained from 13 healthy participants before and after dexmedetomidine sedation. Dexmedetomidine target-controlled infusions and closed-loop acoustic stimulation were implemented to induce and enhance EEG slow waves, respectively. EEG recordings during sedation and sleep were staged using modified American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria. Slow wave activity (EEG power from 0.5 to 4 Hz) was computed for NREM stage 2 (N2) and NREM stage 3 (N3/SWS) epochs, with the aggregate partitioned into quintiles by time. The first slow wave activity quintile served as a surrogate for slow wave pressure, and the difference between the first and fifth quintiles as a measure of slow wave pressure dissipation. ResultsCompared with pre-sedation sleep, post-sedation sleep showed reduced N3 duration (mean difference of −17.1 min, 95% confidence interval −30.0 to −8.2, P=0.015). Dissipation of slow wave pressure was reduced (P=0.02). Changes in combined durations of N2 and N3 between pre- and post-sedation sleep correlated with total dexmedetomidine dose, (r=−0.61, P=0.03). ConclusionsDaytime dexmedetomidine sedation and closed-loop acoustic stimulation targeting EEG slow waves reduced N3/SWS duration and measures of slow wave pressure dissipation on the post-sedation night in healthy young adults. Thus, the paired intervention induces sleep-like states that fulfil certain homeostatic NREM sleep needs in healthy young adults. Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04206059.

Predicting the optimal concentration of remifentanil for skull pin fixation with hemodynamic and analgesia nociception index monitoring

Inadequate antinociception during skull pin fixation may cause hemodynamic instability in intracranial surgery. The optimal concentration of remifentanil to provide adequate antinociception and stable hemodynamics during skull pin fixation under analgesia nociception index monitoring is unknown. This study is to assess the 90% effective concentration of remifentanil for skull pin fixation under hemodynamic and analgesia nociception index monitoring. Twenty-six patients were enrolled for intracranial surgery, anesthesia was induced and maintained under total intravenous anesthesia using target-controlled infusion for remifentanil and propofol under analgesia nociception index and bispectral index monitoring. Skull pin fixation was performed at different effect-site concentrations of remifentanil required for Dixon's up-and-down method with a step size of 0.5 ng/ml under bispectral index 40–60. Inadequate antinociception is defined when either ANI < 30 or > 20% in hemodynamic changes from baseline (e.g. heart rate > 100 beats/min, or blood pressure > 180/100 mmHg) and the effect-site concentration of remifentanil is considered as failure. It is considered success as ANI > 30 and < 20% hemodynamic changes from baseline simultaneously. Seven pairs of failure/success were used for probit analysis. The 90% effective concentration of remifentanil for skull pin fixation with adequate antinociception and hemodynamic stability was 4.7 ng/ml.

Development of extended pharmacokinetic models for propofol based on measured blood and brain concentrations

Propofol’s pharmacokinetics have been extensively studied using human blood samples and applied to target-controlled infusion systems; however, information on its concentration in the brain remains scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to simultaneously measure propofol plasma and brain concentrations in patients who underwent awake craniotomy and establish new pharmacokinetic model. Fifty-seven patients with brain tumors or brain lesions who underwent awake craniotomy were sequentially assigned to model-building and validating groups. Plasma and brain (lobectomy or uncapping margins) samples were collected at five time-points. The concentration of propofol was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted through a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling program using a first-order conditional estimation method with interactions. Propofol’s brain concentrations were higher than its plasma concentrations. The measured brain concentrations were higher than the effect site concentrations using the previous models. Extended models were constructed based on measured concentrations by incorporating the brain/plasma partition coefficient (Kp value). Extended models showed good predictive accuracy for brain concentrations in the validating group. The Kp value functioned as a factor explaining retention in the brain. Our new pharmacokinetic models and Kp value can predict propofol’s brain and plasma concentrations, contributing to safer and more stable anesthesia.

Effect of target-controlled infusion of remifentanil in combination with propofol on anesthesia and endotracheal intubation response in patients undergoing surgical aneurysm clipping

Purpose: To investigate the effect of target-controlled infusion of remifentanil in combination with propofol on anesthesia and endotracheal intubation response in patients undergoing surgical aneurysm clipping. &#x0D; Methods: The clinical data of 106 patients undergoing surgical aneurysm clipping at the Central Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan City, China from September 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Subjects in control group were given fentanyl intravenous infusion anesthesia while study group was treated with target-controlled infusion anesthesia of remifentanil combined with propofol. Hemodynamics and blood-gas indices were evaluated before anesthesia (T1), immediately after endotracheal intubation (T2) and at extubation (T3). The incidence of anesthesia-related complications was determined. &#x0D; Results: In study group, the agitation score was decreased compared to that of control group, while the Ramsay sedation score was increased (p &lt; 0.05). The incidence of cough during endotracheal catheter indwelling and extubation was 7. 27 % in study group, which was less than 21. 57 % in control group (p &lt; 0.05). The cough score of study group was also reduced (p &lt; 0.05). There were no significant differences in the SpO2 and PetCO2 values between the two groups at different times (p &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, the mean arterial pressure at T2 and T3 was upregulated and heart rate (HR) was downregulated in study group (p &lt; 0.05). Recovery time of spontaneous respiration, time of eye-opening and extubation in study group were decreased compared to control group (p &lt; 0.05). &#x0D; Conclusion: Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil in combination with propofol improves anesthetic effect in patients undergoing surgical aneurysm clipping, reduces tracheal intubation reaction, maintains hemodynamic stability and improves recovery quality of patients. Future study will be required to evaluate the efficacy and optimal effective concentration in a diverse population.

Electroencephalographic guided propofol-remifentanil TCI anesthesia with and without dexmedetomidine in a geriatric population: electroencephalographic signatures and clinical evaluation.

Elderly and multimorbid patients are at high risk for developing unfavorable postoperative neurocognitive outcomes; however, well-adjusted and EEG-guided anesthesia may help titrate anesthesia and improve postoperative outcomes. Over the last decade, dexmedetomidine has been increasingly used as an adjunct in the perioperative setting. Its synergistic effect with propofol decreases the dose of propofol needed to induce and maintain general anesthesia. In this pilot study, we evaluate two highly standardized anesthetic regimens for their potential to prevent burst suppression and postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction in a high-risk population. Prospective, randomized clinical trial with non-blinded intervention. Operating room and post anesthesia care unit at Hospital Base San José, Osorno/Universidad Austral, Valdivia, Chile. 23 patients with scheduled non-neurologic, non-cardiac surgeries with age > 69years and a planned intervention time > 60min. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a propofol-remifentanil based anesthesia or an anesthetic regimen with dexmedetomidine-propofol-remifentanil. All patients underwent a slow titrated induction, followed by a target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil (n = 10) or propofol, remifentanil and continuous dexmedetomidine infusion (n = 13). We compared the perioperative EEG signatures, drug-induced changes, and neurocognitive outcomes between two anesthetic regimens in geriatric patients. We conducted a pre- and postoperative Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) test and measured the level of alertness postoperatively using a sedation agitation scale to assess neurocognitive status. During slow induction, maintenance, and emergence, burst suppression was not observed in either group; however, EEG signatures differed significantly between the two groups. In general, EEG activity in the propofol group was dominated by faster rhythms than in the dexmedetomidine group. Time to responsiveness was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.352). Finally, no significant differences were found in postoperative cognitive outcomes evaluated by the MoCa test nor sedation agitation scale up to one hour after extubation. This pilot study demonstrates that the two proposed anesthetic regimens can be safely used to slowly induce anesthesia and avoid EEG burst suppression patterns. Despite the patients being elderly and at high risk, we did not observe postoperative neurocognitive deficits. The reduced alpha power in the dexmedetomidine-treated group was not associated with adverse neurocognitive outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of remifentanil target-controlled infusion for conscious sedation in a pregnant woman: a case report

BackgroundEvery year 2% of pregnant women undergo nonobstetric surgical interventions worldwide. According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice, pregnant women should never be denied the most appropriate surgical treatment, regardless of the trimester of pregnancy. However, additional attention should be paid during the first trimester since it has the highest risk of inducing teratogenic mutations; additionally, during the third trimester, due to the possibility of preterm birth and low birth weight of the newborn, great care should be paid.Case presentationWe present the case of a Caucasian 36-year-old woman during her 21st week of pregnancy, with a normal-sized fetus, according to the gestational age on ultrasound exam, and with no additional risk factors. The patient referred to an increasing nasal obstruction associated with rhinorrhea of the left nasal cavity. She also reported episodes of sleep apnea and hyposmia. The patient received a detailed otolaryngological examination, which allowed for identification of a mass within the left nasal cavity. The subsequent nasal endoscopy confirmed a grayish polypoid mass lesion with a multinodular surface occupying the entire left nasal fossa. The lesion totally obliterated the left maxillary sinus, resulting in obstruction of the anterior osteomeatal unit and ethmoidal sinusitis. She was referred for a functional endoscopic sinus surgery using analgosedation with remifentanil target-controlled infusion.Discussion and conclusionTo the very best of our knowledge, this is the first case described in English literature about the use of analgosedation with remifentanil target-controlled infusion for otolaryngology surgery, specifically in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. It could be an interesting option to avoid the use of inhaled anesthetics that could induce fetal damage, especially during the first months of pregnancy. Furthermore, patient intubation is not necessary, which avoids cases of difficult intubation or any trauma to the airways. An adequate informed consent and appropriate compliance are elements of paramount importance in tailoring the anesthetic strategy for pregnant women who need nonobstetric surgical management.

Effect of Remimazolam Supplementation on Propofol Requirements During Hysteroscopy: A Double-Blind, Dose-Response Study.

Propofol is commonly used for procedural sedation but may increase side effects in a dose-dependent manner. Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, has been approved for procedural sedation but may delay awakening. This study tested the hypothesis that remimazolam as a supplement reduces effect-site propofol concentration (Ceprop) required to suppress response to cervical dilation in patients undergoing hysteroscopy. One hundred and fifty patients who were scheduled for hysteroscopy were randomized to receive 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, or 0.2 mg·kg-1 intravenous remimazolam, followed by a bolus of sufentanil 0.15 μg⋅kg-1, and a target-controlled propofol infusion. The initial target Ceprop was 3.5 μg·mL-1 and was increased or decreased in subsequent patients by steps of 0.5 μg·mL-1 according to whether there was loss of response to cervical dilation in the previous patient. We used up-down sequential analysis to determine values of Ceprop that suppressed response to cervical dilation in 50% of patients (EC50). The EC50 of propofol for suppressing response to cervical dilation was lower in patients given 0.1 mg·kg-1 (2.08 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.88-2.28] μg·mL-1), 0.15 mg⋅kg-1 (1.83 [1.56-2.10] μg·mL-1), and 0.2 mg⋅kg-1 (1.43 [1.27-1.58] μg·mL-1) remimazolam than those given 0 mg⋅kg-1 (3.67 [3.49-3.86] μg·mL-1) or 0.05 mg⋅kg-1 (3.47 [3.28-3.67] μg·mL-1) remimazolam (all were P < .005). Remimazolam at doses of 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 mg·kg-1 decreased EC50 of propofol by 43.3% (95% CI, 41.3%-45.5%), 50.3% (48.0%-52.8%), and 61.2% (58.7%-63.8%), respectively, from baseline (remimazolam 0 mg⋅kg-1). Propofol consumption was lower in patients given 0.1 mg⋅kg-1 (4.15 [3.51-5.44] mg·kg-1), 0.15 mg⋅kg-1 (3.54 [3.16-4.46] mg·kg-1), and 0.2 mg⋅kg-1 (2.74 [1.73-4.01] mg·kg-1) remimazolam than those given 0 mg⋅kg-1 (6.09 [4.99-7.35] mg·kg-1) remimazolam (all were P < .005). Time to anesthesia emergence did not differ significantly among the 5 groups. For women undergoing hysteroscopic procedures, remimazolam at doses from 0.1 to 0.2 mg·kg-1 reduced the EC50 of propofol inhibiting response to cervical dilation and the total propofol requirement. Whether the combination could improve perioperative outcomes deserves further investigation.

External validation of the modified Marsh and Schnider models for medium-chain triglyceride propofol in target-controlled infusion anesthesia

BackgroundPropofol formulated with medium- and long-chain triglycerides (MCT/LCT propofol) has rapidly replaced propofol formulated with long-chain triglycerides (LCT propofol). Despite this shift, the modified Marsh and Schnider pharmacokinetic models developed using LCT propofol are still widely used for target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol. This study aimed to validate the external applicability of these models by evaluating their predictive performance during TCI of MCT/LCT propofol in general anesthesia.MethodsAdult patients (n = 48) undergoing elective surgery received MCT/LCT propofol via a TCI system using either the modified Marsh or Schnider models. Blood samples were collected at various target propofol concentrations and at specific time points, including the loss of consciousness and the recovery of consciousness (13 samples per patient). The actual plasma concentration of propofol was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. The predictive performance of each pharmacokinetic model was assessed by calculating four parameters: inaccuracy, bias, divergence, and wobble.ResultsBoth the modified Marsh and Schnider models demonstrated predictive performances within clinically acceptable ranges for MCT/LCT propofol. The inaccuracy values were 24.4% for the modified Marsh model and 26.9% for the Schnider model. Both models showed an overall positive bias, 16.4% for the modified Marsh model and 16.6% for the Schnider model. The predictive performance of MCT/LCT propofol was comparable to that of LCT propofol, suggesting formulation changes might exert only a minor impact on the reliability of the TCI system during general anesthesia. Additionally, both models exhibited higher bias and inaccuracy at target concentrations ranging from 3.5 ~ 5 ug/ml than at concentrations between 2 ~ 3 ug/ml.ConclusionsThe modified Marsh and Schnider models, initially developed for LCT propofol, remain clinically acceptable for TCI with MCT/LCT propofol.Trial registrationThis study was registered at the Clinical Research Information Service of the Korean National Institute of Health (https://cris.nih.go.kr; registration number: KCT0002191; 06/01/2017).

Effect of remifentanil on three effect-site concentrations of propofol and their relationship during electroencephalography at loss of response, at maximum alpha power, and at onset of burst suppression: a prospective randomized trial.

The effect-site concentration (Ce) at loss of response (Ce-LOR) to propofol closely correlates both with Ce as electroencephalographic alpha power becomes highest (Ce-alpha) and with Ce at onset of burst suppression (BS) (Ce-OBS), when no opioids are administered. Co-administration of opioids dose-dependently decreases Ce-LOR. We investigated the influence of remifentanil on the relationship between these three Ces. After receiving approval from our local ethical committee, with written informed consent, we enrolled 90 participants (ASA-PS I or II) who were scheduled for elective surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: constant remifentanil Ce 0ng/ml (Remi_0); 1ng/mL (Remi_1); and 2ng/mL (Remi_2). We recorded both raw EEG and EEG-derived parameters on a computer. After reaching remifentanil equilibrium, we administered propofol using a target-controlled infusion pump such that propofol Ce increased to about 0.3μg/mL/min. After determining Ce-LOR, we administered 0.6mg/kg of rocuronium and started mask ventilation. The study protocol ended after observation of BS. Three participants were excluded. Ce-LOR in each group (Remi_0, Remi_1, Remi_2) was 2.00 ± 0.58μg/mL, 1.43 ± 0.49μg/mL, and 1.37 ± 0.42μg/mL. Ce-alpha was 2.91 ± 0.63μg/mL, 2.30 ± 0.41μg/mL, and 2.12 ± 0.39μg/mL. Ce-OBS was 3.80 ± 0.69μg/mL, 3.25 ± 0.68μg/mL, and 2.90 ± 0.57μg/mL. In three other instances, Ce was decreased by remifentanil. Generalized linear model analysis revealed that remifentanil had no influence on the relationship between the three Ces. During propofol anesthesia, even low concentrations of remifentanil shifted concentration-related electroencephalographic changes.

Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.

This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This was a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial set at Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan. We included 36 patients aged ≥ 20years scheduled to undergo elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) under general anesthesia. The participants were randomly assigned to the remimazolam and propofol groups (n = 18 each). Remimazolam- or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia was initiated at 12mg/kg/min or 2.5mcg/mL via target-controlled infusion, respectively, along with remifentanil. After confirming the loss of consciousness, the administration rate was adjusted using electroencephalographic monitoring. The primary outcome was the rate of arterial hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure < 60mmHg, from anesthesia induction until the beginning of the surgical incision. The total doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine were also assessed. During anesthesia induction, the arterial hypotension rates were 11.9% and 21.6% in the remimazolam and propofol groups, respectively (P = 0.01). The total dose of ephedrine was higher in the propofol group (14.4mg) than in the remimazolam group (1.6mg) (P < 0.001); however, the total dose of phenylephrine was not significantly different between the two groups (propofol 0.31mg vs. remimazolam: 0.17mg, P = 0.10). Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia resulted in a lower hypotension rate than propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during induction in patients undergoing TAVR. Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia can be used safely during anesthetic induction in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

General purpose propofol target-controlled infusion using the marsh model with adjusted weight input.

We report a simple method for adjusting the weight input of the Marsh target-controlled infusion (TCI) model such that the resulting infusion regime closely mimics the behaviour of the Eleveld model, thereby making the Marsh model more precise for patients at the extremes of age and body mass index. To assess the performance of our method, we simulated 2768 subjects with diverse combinations of age, weight, height and sex undergoing a hypothetical four-hour propofol TCI using both the Marsh model with our weight adjustment and the Eleveld model. The weight adjusted Marsh model produced infusion regimes and corresponding effect site concentrations closely mimicking that of the Eleveld model at all time points, with median and maximum absolute performance errors less than 8.1% and 20.3%, respectively, across the entire cohort. Our weight adjustment method is a simple and robust way of improving the precision of the Marsh model in patients at extremes of age and body mass index, until general purpose TCI models for propofol, such as the Eleveld model, become more widely available in commercial infusion pumps.