Purpose: Measurements of left ventricular (LV) systolic function, in particular strain, are gaining popularity as predictor of CRT effectiveness. Also, spatially accurate strain mapping, may help guiding intramyocardial biological therapy delivery and assessment. We recently developed a method for the simultaneous assessment of the LV electrical and mechanical activity. We sought to compare volume and strain measurements derived from electromechanical anatomical mapping (EMAM) with the gold standard technique, MRI. Methods: In 22 patients, EMAM maps (NOGA XP, BDS) and MRI images (3.0 T Magnetom Skyra, Siemens) were obtained within 1 month. MRI images were analyzed to obtain end-systolic (ESV), end-diastolic volumes (EDV) and ejection fractions (EF) from cine images and circumferential strain (CS) from MRI tagging images. EMAM was analyzed using custom software: volumes were calculated as the volume enclosed by the convex surface fitting the catheter tip positions, while CS was derived from the motion field of the catheter tip at the different locations. Regional peak CS values were averaged over points belonging to the same cardiac sector (6 sectors for the basal, mid and apical levels). Inter-technique agreement was tested through correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Conclusion: This is the first study demonstrating the feasibility of assessing ventricular systolic function based on EMAM, and validating it against the current reference technique. The proposed approach allows the combined assessment of the electrical and mechanical activities without the need of error-prone separate strain and electrical imaging. EMAM-based strain analysis may be extended to the entire cardiac cycle, overcoming the limitations associated with the fading MRI tags.