Abstract Background Optimal immunosupression is crucial for transplant success. In orthohepatic transplants, blood target levels of tacrolimus, when coadministred with corticoids and mycophenolic acid, are between 6 and 10 ng/mL during the first three months post-transplant. Notwithstanding, achieving tacrolimus concentrations into this range may be tough because of factors such as liver function status, age, sex, drug-drug interactions, etc. In this way, pharmacogenetic testing of CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 genes have demonstrated to be useful in tacrolimus dosing optimization. Nonetheless, there is no evidence enough for pharmacogenetic based adjusting in liver transplant, specially if receptor and graft’s genotypes differ in these loci. The aim of the present study is to find out how the receptor and donor genotypes in CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 genes affect tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Methods Genotypic profiling of 108 receptor-donor's pairs biopsies gathered from patients who were underwent hepatic transplant from 2012 to 2019 were carried out using Taqman® OpenArray™ PGx Express 120 panel (ThermoFisher™). We focused on CYP3A5*3, *6 and *7; and CYP3A4*1B, *3 and *22 alleles. Next to pharmacogenetic testing, each patient was classified as very poor, poor, intermediate, rapid or ultrarapid metabolizer according to their own genotype, graft’s genotype or both of them. Patient’s initial dose, at seven days after treatment start and after discharge of tacrolimus and their trough concentrations (C0) were collected from their electronic health records. Tacrolimus levels were measured by affinity chrome-mediated immunoassay. C0 was normalized by weight-adjusted dosage (C/D ratio); then, median C/D ratios between different metabolic profiles were compared through Kruskal-Wallis test. Results When patients were classified based on donor’s genotype isolated or combined with receptor’s genotype, lower C/D ratios were found as metabolizer ability increases (p=0.045 for donors and p=0.027 for combined genotypes, respectively). No statistically differences were found for C/D ratios at seven days and discharge, though that differences were almost significant for donor’s genotypes (p=0.06 in both cases). Conclusions These results show that previous information about both patient’s and specially donor’s CYP genes genotype may improve initial immunosupression and avoid tacrolimus induced toxicity. Pharmacogenetics has been currently proposed as a guide for tacrolimus treatment of some solid organ transplants as kidney transplanted patients. Better understanding of how receptor and donor’s CYP genotype affects its pharmacokinetics, along with liver’s damage markers and other genetic polymorphisms will allow clinicians, in the era of personalized medicine, to improve immunosupressive management.