T5-T12 Kyphosis Research Articles

Vertebral Body Tethering for Thoracolumbar Curvatures in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes at 2–6-Year Follow-Up

Background: The gold standard treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, long-term consequences of PSF can include reduced spinal flexibility, back pain, and intervertebral disc degeneration. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative that preserves motion. We investigated the outcomes of VBT for the treatment of thoracolumbar (TL) major AIS in the largest single-surgeon series with a minimum 2-year follow-up (FU). Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center review. Inclusion criteria were AIS, Lenke 5/6 curvature, and skeletally immature Variables were compared using Student’s t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: A total of 37 consecutive patients, age 14.1 ± 1.6 years, 86.5% F, 35.9 ± 11.5-month FU, were examined. Overall, 27 patients (73%) had Lenke 5 and 10 (27%) had Lenke 6 curvatures. Instrumentation of the TL curve alone was performed in 59.5%, and thoracic (T) and TL in 40.5% of patients. Overall, 45.9% of patients had two tethers placed in the TL spine; no patients had double tethers placed at the main thoracic curves. The TL (51 ± 8° to 20 ± 11°; p < 0.0001) and T (37 ± 13° to 17 ± 10°; p < 0.0001) curvatures improved from baseline to the latest FU. Overall, 89% of patients achieved major Cobb < 35°; the three patients who did not experienced at least one cord breakage or required PSF. T5-T12 kyphosis increased (p = 0.0401) and lumbar lordosis was maintained (p = 0.9236). Both the TL inclinometer (16 ± 4º to 4 ± 2°; p < 0.0001) and T (6 ± 4° to 4 ± 3°; p = 0.0036) measurements improved. There was a 49% tether breakage rate as follows: 60% for single-cord TL constructs and 35% for double cords (p = 0.0991). There was an 8.1% re-operation rate as follows: one conversion to T PSF and revision of the TL tether; one release of the T tether and revision of the TL tether; one screw revision for radiculopathy. One patient was re-admitted for poor pain control. Conclusions: Patients with TL major curvature treated with VBT experienced a high rate of clinically successful outcomes with maintenance of lumbar lordosis and relatively low complication rates at the latest FU.

Three-dimensional deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: what are the benefits of hybrid apical sublaminar bands versus all-pedicle screws?

The amount of three-dimensional (3D) correction with apical sublaminar band (hybrid-SLB) technique has not been compared to all-pedicle screw instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using detailed axial correction metrics or comparable rod types. Our purpose is to compare 3D improvement in AIS deformities following posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSIF) with hybrid-SLB and segmental correction to all-pedicle screw correction. Patients ages 10-18 years with AIS who underwent PSIF between 2015 and 2022 and had preoperative and postoperative EOS imaging were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic, Lenke classification, operative technique, and 3D EOS data. Average changes in major and minor Cobb angle, axial rotation, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis were compared. Ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria with 55 in the hybrid-SLB group (mean age 14.9 ± 1.9 years) and 40 in all-pedicle screw (mean age 14.7 ± 2.1 years). While all-pedicle screw demonstrated greater correction of major (45.7 ± 13.4 vs 37.9 ± 14.3 degrees; P = 0.008) and minor (28.7 ± 13.1 vs 17.8 ± 12.5 degrees; P = 0.001) Cobb angles, hybrid-SLB showed greater increase in T4-T12 kyphosis (13.3 ± 15.3 vs 5.6 ± 13.5 degrees; P = 0.01). Correction of T1-T12 kyphosis, axial rotation, and lumbar lordosis was similar between groups. 3D EOS analysis of AIS patients before and after PSIF revealed that all-pedicle screw constructs had greater overall coronal plane correction and hybrid-SLB had greater thoracic sagittal plane correction. Axial corrective abilities were similar. Hybrid-SLB may have advantages for correction of thoracic lordosis or hypokyphosis. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Severe (>100 Degrees) Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis - A Comparison of Surgical Approaches.

Retrospective. Severe curves >100° in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are rare and require careful operative planning. The aim of this study was to assess baseline, perioperative, and 2-year differences between anterior release with posterior instrumentation (AP), posterior instrumentation with posterior column osteotomies (P), and posterior instrumentation with 3-column vertebral osteotomies (VCR). Two scoliosis datasets were queried for primary cases of severe thoracic AIS (≥100°) with 2-year follow-up. Pre- and 2-year postoperative radiographic measures (2D and estimated 3D kyphosis), clinical measurements, and SRS-22 outcomes were compared between three approaches. Sixty-one patients were included: 16 AP (26%), 38 P (62%), 7 VCR (11%). Average age was 14.4 ± 2.0 years; 75.4% were female. Preoperative thoracic curve magnitude (AP: 112°, P: 115°, VCR: 126°, P = 0.09) and T5-T12 kyphosis (AP: 38°, P: 59°, VCR: 70°, P = 0.057) were similar between groups. Estimated 3D kyphosis was less in AP vs P (-12° vs 4°, P = 0.016). Main thoracic curves corrected to 36° in AP vs 49° and 48° for P and VCR, respectively (P = 0.02). Change in estimated 3D kyphosis was greater in AP vs P and VCR (34° vs 13°, P = 0.009; 34° vs 7°, P = 0.046). One incomplete spinal cord injury had residual deficits (P; 1/61, 1.6%). All SRS-22 domains improved postoperatively. All approaches obtained satisfactory coronal and sagittal correction, but AP had smaller residual coronal deformity and greater kyphosis restoration than the other approaches. This information may help inform the decision of whether to include an anterior release for large thoracic AIS curves.

Inter-Evaluator Reliability of Sagittal and Rotational Spinal Measurements from 3D Ultrasound Imaging of Healthy Females in Standing with Varying Arm Positions

ABSTRACT Spinal alignment can be assessed without radiation using three-dimensional ultrasound imaging (3DUS). Reliable measurements could inform the ideal arm position for scoliosis radiographs. This study determined the inter-evaluator reliability of axial vertebral rotation (AVR) measurements and sagittal curve angles in healthy females from 3DUS spinal images in standing with two common radiograph arm positions: Chin and abduction (Abd). Three novice evaluators (R1, R2, and R3) measured images once. The Bland–Altman bias and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated. T5-T12 kyphosis measurements met our bias and LOA error threshold only for R1 vs R2 in the Chin position [−0.53° (−10.7,9.7)]. The distance between the bias and the LOA also met our acceptable threshold of 5° for all mean AVRTwist, and all but one AVRTwist measurements (R1-R2_Chin = 5.9°). Three lordosis measurements did not meet our acceptable threshold (R1-R2_Chin, R1-R3_Chin, and R2-R3_Abd). The inter-evaluator reliability of novice evaluators was adequate and did not differ significantly between positions.

Examining autocorrection of concurrent cervical malalignment following thoracolumbar deformity surgery.

The aim of the study was to assess preoperative radiographic parameters predictive of cervical deformity (CD) autocorrection in patients undergoing thoracolumbar deformity (ASD) surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were operative ASD patients with complete baseline (BL) and 2-year radiographic data. Patients with cervical fusion during index surgery, revision involving cervical fusion, and those who developed proximal junctional kyphosis by 2-year postoperative were excluded from the study. If patients met CD criteria at BL but not at 6 weeks or 2 years postoperatively, they were considered autocorrected (AC). Descriptive and univariate analysis, binominal logistic regression, and multivariable backward stepwise regression. Two hundred and twenty ASD patients were included. 51.4% of patients had preoperative CD. By 6-week postoperative, 32.7% achieved AC. At 2 years, 24.8% of preoperative CD patients obtained AC. 2-year AC patients had lower BL sacral slope, lumbar lordosis (LL), T1 slope, cervical lordosis (CL), and C2-T3, and T2-T12 kyphosis (all P < 0.05). Patients with BL-unmatched Roussouly types are corrected postoperatively and are more likely to experience autocorrection at 1 year (45.2% vs. 19.0%; P = 0.042) and at 2 years (31% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.018). Multivariable analysis revealed that patients with BL-mismatched Roussouly types were corrected postoperatively and showed a significant increase in likelihood of AC at 1 year (odds ratio [OR]: 18.72; P = 0.029) and 2 years (OR: 8.5; P = 0.047). Similarly, BL LL (OR: 0.772; P = 0.003) and CL (OR: 0.829; P = 0.005) exhibited significant predictive value for autocorrection at 1 year and 2 years (OR: 0.927; P = 0.004 | OR: 0.942; P = 0.039; respectively). Autocorrection is more likely in patients with postoperatively corrected Roussouly types, those with lower BL cervical, and LL. Given these findings, it may not be necessary to routinely extend reconstruction into the cervical spine for ASD patients with similar characteristics to those in this study.

Double major curvature treated with vertebral body tethering of both curves: how do outcomes compare to posterior spinal fusion?

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative to posterior spinal fusion (PSF). There have been few reports on VBT of two curvatures. We aim to compare the radiographic outcomes between VBT and PSF in patients with double curvatures in which both curves were instrumented. 29 AIS patients matched by Lenke, age (± 2years), triradiate cartilage closure status, major Cobb angle (± 8°), and T5-T12 kyphosis (± 10°). Variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Student's t tests, and chi-Square. Clinical success was defined as major curve < 35°. Group baseline demographics were similar. Major thoracic (T) curve types had significantly better major (VBT 51.5 ± 7.9° to 31.6 ± 12.0° [40%] vs. PSF 54.3 ± 7.4° to 17.4 ± 6.5° [68%]; p = 0.0002) and secondary curve correction in the PSF group. 71% of major T VBT patients were clinically successful versus 100% of PSF. Major thoracolumbar (TL) curve types experienced comparable major (VBT 52.3 ± 7.0° to 18.3 ± 11.4° (65%) vs. PSF 53.0 ± 5.2° to 23.8 ± 10.9° (56%); p = 0.2397) and secondary curve correction. 92% of major TL VBT patients were clinically successful versus 75% in the PSF group. There was no difference in T5-12 kyphosis or lumbar lordosis between groups for any curve type. There were 4 patients (13.8%) with major complications in the VBT group compared to 0 (0%) in the PSF. Patients with double major AIS who underwent VBT with major T curve types had less correction than PSF; however, those with major TL curves experienced similar radiographic outcomes regardless of procedure. Complications were greater for VBT.

FUSIONLESS ALL PEDICLE SCREWS POSTERIOR DEFORMITY CORRECTION IN AIS IMMATURE PATIENTS PERMITS RESTORATION OF THE NORMAL VERTEBRAL MORPHOLOGY AND REMOVAL OF THE INSTRUMENTATION ONCE BONE MATURITY IS REACHED

The aim of this study was to report the restauration of the normal vertebral morphology and the absence of curve progression after removal the instrumentation in AIS patients that underwent posterior correction of the deformity by common all screws construct whitout fusion. A series of 36 AIS immature patients (Risser 3 or less) were include in the study. Instrumentation was removed once the maturity stage was complete (Risser 5). Curve correction was assessed at pre and postoperative, before instrumentation removal, just post removal, and more than two years after instrumentation removal. Epiphyseal vertebral growth modulation was assessed by a coronal wedging ratio (WR) at the apical level of the main curve (MC). The mean preoperative coronal Cobb was corrected from 53.7°±7.5 to 5.5º±7.5º (89.7%) at the immediate postop. After implants removal (31.0±5.8 months) the MC was 13.1º. T5–T12 kyphosis showed a significant improvement from 19.0º before curve correction to 27.1º after implants removal (p&lt;0.05). Before surgery, WR was 0.71±0.06, and after removal WR was 0.98±0.08 (p&lt;0.001). At the end of follow-up, the mean sagittal range of motion (ROM) of the T12-S1 segment was 51.2±21.0º. SRS-22 scores improved from 3.31±0.25 preoperatively to 3.68±0.25 at final assessment (p&lt;0.001). In conclusion, fusionless posterior approach using a common all pedicle screws construct correct satisfactory scoliotic main curves and permits removal of the instrumentation once the bone maturity is reached. The final correction was highly satisfactory and an acceptable ROM of the previously lower instrumented segments was observed.

Coronal alignment in normal individuals and moderate scoliosis: Normative values, variation with age and comparison with sagittal alignment

IntroductionGlobal coronal alignment is mainly assessed by C7 plumbline and central sacral vertical line (CSVL), pelvic obliquity and shoulder alignment. A detailed analysis is mandatory when treating spinal deformity. It remains unclear to what extent mild scoliosis influences global coronal alignment. Research questionThe objective was to define a comprehensive set of coronal alignment parameters and to investigate differences between individuals without spinal deformity and with mild scoliosis. The relationship between coronal and sagittal alignment and the influence of age were studied. MethodsRadiographs of 236 normal individuals (Group N) and 140 patients with scoliosis <35° (Group S) were prospectively collected. Coronal parameters were femoral head distance and angle, pelvic obliquity, Maloney angle, L4 and L5 inclinations, coronal T1 pelvic angle, C7-CSVL and odontoid CSVL offset, coracoid distance and angle. Sagittal cervical, spinopelvic, thoracolumbar and global parameters were measured. ResultsThere was no significant difference between groups N and S for coronal parameters, except for L4 and L5 inclinations with a mean difference of 3,3° (p < 0,001). Global coronal alignment kept constant throughout age groups in N and S groups. Sagittal parameters varied with age: C2-C7 lordosis (p < 0,001), T1-T12 kyphosis (p < 0,001), pelvic incidence (p < 0,001). There was no correlation between global coronal and sagittal alignment: R-values ranging from −0.2 to 0.2. ConclusionGlobal coronal parameters were comparable in normal individuals and in scoliosis <35°. Coronal plane parameters were not influenced by age. Sagittal plane parameters varied significantly with age. There was no direct link between coronal et sagittal alignment.

Alterations in Magnitude and Shape of Thoracic Kyphosis Following Surgical Correction for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Retrospective review of prospective multicenter data. This study aimed to investigate the shape of TK before and after fusion in ASD patients treated with long fusion. ASD patients undergoing posterior spinal fusions including at least T5 to L1 without prior fusion extending to the thoracic spine were included. Patients were categorized based on the preoperative T1-T12 kyphosis into: Hypo-TK (if < 30°), Normal-TK, and Hyper-TK (if > 70°). Regional kyphosis at T10-L1 (Distal), T5-T10 (Middle), and T1-T5 (Proximal) and their relative contributions to total kyphosis were compared between groups, and the pre-to postoperative changes were investigated using paired t test. In total, 329 patients were included in this analysis (mean age: 57 ± 16years, 79.6% female). Preoperative T1-T12TK for the entire cohort was 40.9 ± 2° (32% Hypo-TK, 11% Hyper-TK, 57% Normal-TK). The Hypo-TK group had the smallest distal TK (5.9 vs 17.1 & 26.0), and middle TK (8.0 vs 25.3 & 45.4), but the percentage of contribution to total kyphosis was not significantly different (Distal: 24.1% vs 34.1% vs 32.8%; Middle: 46.6% vs 53.9% vs 56.8%, all P > .1). Postoperatively, T1-12TK increased significantly (40.9 ± 2.0° vs 57.8 ± 17.6°). Each group had a decrease in distal kyphosis (Hypo-TK 2.6 ± 10.4°; Normal-TK 8.9 ± 11.5°; Hyper-TK 14.9 ± 12°, all P < .05). The middle kyphosis significantly decreased for Hyper-TK (11.8 ± 12.4) and increased for both Normal-TK and Hypo-TK (3.8 ± 11° and 14.2 ± 11°). Proximal TK increased significantly for all groups by 14-18°. Deterioration from Normal-TK to Hyper-TK postoperatively was associated with lower rate of patient satisfaction (59.6% vs 77.3%, P = .032). Posterior spinal fusion for ASD alters the magnitude and shape of thoracic kyphosis. While 60% of patients had a normal TK at baseline, 30% of those patients developed iatrogenic hyperkyphosis postoperatively. Patients with baseline hypokyphosis were more likely to be corrected to normal TK than hyperkyphotic patients. Future research should investigate TK restoration in ASD and its impact on clinical outcomes and complications.

The three-dimensional coupling mechanism in scoliosis and its consequences for correction

IntroductionIn idiopathic scoliosis, the anterior spinal column has rotated away from the midline and has become longer through unloading and expansion of the intervertebral discs. Theoretically, extension of the spine in the sagittal plane should provide room for this longer anterior spinal column, allowing it to swing back towards the midline in the coronal and axial plane, thus reducing both the Cobb angle and the apical vertebral rotation.MethodsIn this prospective experimental study, ten patients with primary thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) underwent MRI (BoneMRI and cVISTA sequences) in supine as well as in an extended position by placing a broad bolster, supporting both hemi-thoraces, under the scoliotic apex. Differences in T4–T12 kyphosis angle, coronal Cobb angle, vertebral rotation, as well as shape of the intervertebral disc and shape and position of the nucleus pulposus, were analysed and compared between the two positions.ResultsExtension reduced T4–T12 thoracic kyphosis by 10° (p < 0.001), the coronal Cobb angle decreased by 9° (p < 0.001) and vertebral rotation by 4° (p = 0.036). The coronal wedge shape of the disc significantly normalized and the wedged and lateralized nucleus pulposus partially reduced to a more symmetrical position.ConclusionSimple extension of the scoliotic spine leads to a reduction of the deformity in the coronal and axial plane. The shape of the disc normalizes and the eccentric nucleus pulposus partially moves back to the midline.

Sagittal plane assessment of manual concave rod bending for posterior correction in adolescents with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis (Lenke 1 and 3)

ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of a method for measuring freehand rod bending and to analyze the relationship between the rod's bend and the resulting sagittal correction. Materials and methodsAll the children who underwent correction by posterior translation using pedicle screws at all levels were included prospectively in 2018 and 2019. The rod's sagittal parameters were measured retrospectively by three independent surgeons on two separate occasions using the same protocol. After the rods were bent but before they were inserted, the surgeon traced the contours of the rods on a sheet of paper that was later scanned and analyzed semiautomatically. The spinal parameters were calculated based on biplanar radiographs taken preoperatively, postoperatively and at the final follow-up visit. Patients who had less than 10° thoracic kyphosis (T5–T12) made up the “Lenke N−” subgroup. ResultsThirty patients were included (14 of whom were Lenke N−) who had a Cobb angle of 59.2±11.3° preoperatively and 13.3±8.4° postoperatively (p<0.00001). The inter- and intrarater ICC for the rod measurements were>0.9 (excellent). The mean kyphosis of the concave rod was 48.4±5.7° (38.3–60.9°). The mean change in T5–T12 kyphosis was 9.7±10.8° (−14.3–30.8°) (p<0.0001) in the entire population, while it was 17.7±7.1° (5.5–30.8°) (p<0.0001) in the Lenke N− subgroup. The change in thoracic kyphosis was positively correlated with the kyphosis of the concave rod (rho=0.52; p=0.003). ConclusionThis study found excellent reproducibility and repeatability of measuring freehand rod bending. The kyphosis applied to the concave rod is positively correlated to the change in the resulting kyphosis and made it possible to restore satisfactory thoracic kyphosis. Level of evidenceIII.

Thoracoscopic Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering in Lenke Type-1 Right Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is indicated for skeletally immature patients with progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who have failed or are intolerant of bracing and who have a major coronal curve of 40° to 65°. The vertebral body must be structurally and dimensionally adequate to accommodate screw fixation, as determined radiographically. The best indication for VBT is a flexible single major thoracic curve with nonstructural compensating lumbar and proximal thoracic curves (Lenke 1A or 1B). VBT allows for progressive correction of the deformity without spinal fusion by utilizing a minimally invasive fluoroscopic technique. The procedure for a right thoracic curve is performed with use of a right thoracoscopic approach with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position. The thoracoscope is introduced through a portal at the apex of the curvature in the posterior axillary line. Instrument portals are created lateral to each vertebral body in the mid-axillary line. Screws are inserted into each vertebral body under biplanar fluoroscopic control and with intraoperative neuromonitoring. An electroconductivity probing device, while not mandatory, is routinely utilized at our practice. The tether is attached to the most proximal screw of the construct, and then reduction is obtained sequentially by tensioning the tether from one vertebral screw to the next. Bracing is the gold-standard treatment for progressive AIS involving the immature spine. The most commonly utilized surgical treatment is posterior spinal fusion (PSF), which should be considered when the major coronal curve exceeds 45°. PSF has proven to be a dependable technique to correct scoliotic deformities. It has a low complication rate and good long-term outcomes. However, concerns exist regarding the stiffness conferred by PSF and the long-term effects of adjacent segment disease. Thus, interest had developed in non-fusion solutions for AIS correction. VBT utilizes the Hueter-Volkmann principle to guide growth and correct deformity. Compressive forces applied to the convexity of the deformity by a polyethylene tether allow the patient's growth to realign the spine. Intraoperative correction triggers growth modulation, and most of the modulation seems to occur during the first 12 months postoperatively. The best results have been seen with a short Lenke type-1A curve in a patient with closed triradiate cartilage, a Risser 3 or lower (ideally Risser 0) iliac apophysis, and a flexible curve characterized by a 50% reduction of the major coronal curve angle on side-bending radiographs. In 57 immature patients with a Lenke type-1A or 1B curve (i.e., a 30° to 65° preoperative Cobb angle), Samdani et al.3 found a main thoracic Cobb angle reduction from 40° ± 7° preoperatively to 19° ± 13° at 2 years after VBT. In the sagittal plane, the T5-T12 kyphosis measured 15° ± 10° preoperatively, 17° ± 10° postoperatively, and 20° ± 13° at 2 years. No major neurologic or pulmonary complications occurred. A total of 7 (12.3%) of the 57 patients underwent surgical revision, including 5 for overcorrection and 2 to span additional vertebrae. In a study of 21 skeletally mature patients, Pehlivanoglu et al.4 found that the Cobb angle was reduced from 48° preoperatively to 16° on the first-erect postoperative radiograph and finally to 10° at the latest follow-up (mean, 27.4 months). The 2 main complications of VBT reported in the literature are overcorrection and tether breakage. Both may require revision, which explains the higher rate of revision observed for VBT compared with PSF. Good patient selection is important. VBT is most appropriate in cases of a flexible Lenke type-1A or 1B curve in an immature child before Risser stage 3 and after triradiate cartilage closure.Always monitor and control screw positioning in both anteroposterior and lateral planes fluoroscopically.The screws should be placed parallel to the vertebral end plates or, even better, be angled inferiorly for the upper vertebrae and angled superiorly for the lower vertebrae to decrease the risk of pull-out when tensioning the device and during growth modulation. Less tension on the uppermost and lowermost instrumented vertebrae than at the apex, as controlled by the tensioning device, can also help to limit pull-out. VBT = vertebral body tetheringAIS = adolescent idiopathic scoliosisIONM = intraoperative neuromonitoringPSF = posterior spinal fusionUIV = upper instrumented vertebraLIV = lower instrumented vertebraAP = anteroposteriorK-wire = Kirschner wire.

Single Long-Incision Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Retrospective cohort study. The objective of this study is to determine differences in outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery using a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) approach versus single and triple-incision minimally invasive surgery (MIS). MIS increased in popularity as surgeons' focus moved towards soft tissue preservation, but it carries technical demands and increased surgical time compared with PSF. Surgeries performed from 2016 to 2020 were included. Cohorts were formed based on surgical approach: PSF versus single long-incision MIS (SLIM) versus traditional MIS [3-incision MIS (3MIS)]. There were a total of 7 subanalyses. Demographic, radiographic, and perioperative data were collected for the 3 groups. Kruskal-Wallis and χ 2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Five hundred thirty-two patients met our inclusion criteria, 294 PSF, 179 3MIS, and 59 SLIM.Estimated blood loss (mL) ( P < 0.00001) and length of stay (LOS) ( P < 0.00001) was significantly higher in PSF than in SLIM and 3MIS. Surgical time was significantly higher in 3MIS than in PSF and SLIM ( P = 0.0012).Patients who underwent PSF had significantly lower postoperative T5 to T12 kyphosis ( P < 0.00001) and percentage kyphosis change ( P < 0.00001). Morphine equivalence was significantly higher in the PSF group during total hospital stay ( P = 0.0042).Patients who underwent SLIM and 3MIS were more likely to return to noncontact ( P = 0.0096) and contact sports ( P = 0.0095) within 6 months and reported lower pain scores ( P < 0.001) at 6 months postoperation. SLIM has a similar operative time to PSF and is technically similar to PSF while maintaining the surgical and postoperative outcome advantages of 3MIS.

Fusionless All-Pedicle Screws for Posterior Deformity Correction in AIS Immature Patients Permit the Restoration of Normal Vertebral Morphology and Removal of the Instrumentation Once Bone Maturity Is Reached.

The aim of this study was to report the restoration of normal vertebral morphology and the absence of curve progression after the removal of instrumentation in AIS patients that underwent posterior correction of the deformity by a common all-screws construct without fusion. A series of 36 AIS immature patients (Risser 3 or less) were included in the study. Instrumentation was removed once the maturity stage was complete (Risser 5). The curve correction was assessed pre- and postoperatively, before instrumentation removal, directly post-removal, and more than two years after instrumentation was removed. Epiphyseal vertebral growth modulation was assessed by the coronal wedging ratio (WR) at the apical level of the main curve (MC). The mean preoperative coronal Cobb was corrected from 53.7° ± 7.5 to 5.5° ± 7.5° (89.7%) at the immediate postop. After implant removal (31.0 ± 5.8 months), the MC was 13.1°. T5-T12 kyphosis showed significant improvement from 19.0° before curve correction to 27.1° after implant removal (p < 0.05). Before surgery, the WR was 0.71 ± 0.06, and after removal, 0.98 ± 0.08 (p < 0.001). At the end of the follow-up, the mean sagittal range of motion (ROM) of the T12-S1 segment was 51.2 ± 21.0°. The SRS-22 scores improved from 3.31 ± 0.25 preoperatively to 3.68 ± 0.25 at the final assessment (p < 0.001). In conclusion, a fusionless posterior approach using common all-pedicle screws correctly constructed satisfactory scoliotic main curves and permitted the removal of instrumentation once bone maturity was reached. The final correction was highly satisfactory, and an acceptable ROM of the previously lower instrumented segments was observed.

Predictors of Rod Length Gain and Sagittal Alignment Change After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Lengthening.

This was a retrospective cohort study. There are preoperative characteristics that predict rod lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). The lengthening of MCGR will lead to increased kyphosis. The amount of length gained by MCGR is variable, and predictors are lacking. Similarly, sagittal plane changes over the MCGR lengthening period have not been investigated. Patients with MCGR and a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified and those with previous spine surgery were excluded. Preimplantation, postimplantation, and last follow-up postlengthening radiographs were examined. Multiple linear regression analyses were used for rod length gain predictors. Fifty-six patients with early-onset scoliosis met inclusion criteria: nine idiopathic, five congenital, 14 neuromuscular, 20 syndromic, and eight skeletal dysplasia patients. No difference was seen between subtypes of early-onset scoliosis for rod length gain ( P =0.62). Shorter preoperative T1-T12 height and higher curve correction rate after implantation were significant predictors for rod length gain ( P <0.001). Preoperative major curve magnitude and kyphosis were not significant predictors. Flattening of the spine around the actuator and compensative increase in T1-T5 kyphosis were seen secondarily after MCGR implantation. Maximum sagittal kyphosis, T1-T5 kyphosis, and T5-T12 kyphosis did not change during lengthening. Lumbar lordosis significantly decreased postimplantation (first erect) but then increased during lengthening. Pelvic incidence and sacral slope both increased during lengthening, but this may be age related. Patients who gained the most rod length with MCGR were those with an initially shorter T1-T12 height and better initial curve correction at implantation, likely representing that implants work best in small patients with flexible curves. Diagnosis, preoperative curve magnitude, and thoracic kyphosis were not related to rod length gain. Thoracic kyphosis did not deteriorate over the lengthening phase. Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Temporary Flexible Rods for Correction of Severe Pediatric Spinal Deformity.

Surgical correction of large, rigid scoliotic and kyphotic curves carries an increased risk of perioperative complications, such as neurological injury and excessive blood loss, compared with correction of less severe curves. Titanium temporary flexible rods (TFRs), designed for pediatric long bone fracture fixation, may be helpful as adjuncts to achieve gradual, stepwise intraoperative correction of severe pediatric spinal deformities. A retrospective review was conducted of spinal fusion cases for pediatric scoliosis or kyphosis at our institution that used TFRs as a correction technique from 2007 to 2019. Patients underwent posterior spinal fusion with predominantly pedicle screw instrumentation. Intraoperatively, a non-contoured titanium elastic nail was temporarily positioned in the screws unilaterally to achieve partial correction while the contralateral side was instrumented. Then, the TFR was removed and replaced with a permanent rod. Thirty-four patients with severe spinal deformities underwent posterior spinal fusion. Seventeen had scoliosis (mean major Cobb angle, 89.3°) and 17 had kyphosis (mean T5-T12 kyphosis, 73.8°). Idiopathic deformity was the most common etiology; neuromuscular, syndromic, and postsurgical causes contributed to the remainder of cases. All patients had Ponte osteotomies. Four patients (11.8%) had neuromonitoring alerts, 1 of which was related to insertion of the TFR; all were reversible. For patients with scoliosis, the mean postoperative Cobb angle measured 40.2° (53.6% correction). For patients with kyphosis, the mean postoperative T5-T12 angle measured 43.3° (30.4° of correction). TFRs appear to be helpful adjuncts for correction of severe pediatric spinal deformities, facilitating gradual intraoperative correction in a single-stage operation. Neuromonitoring alerts are common but reversible. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):234-241.].

Psychopathological profile and sagittal alignment in low-back pain

IntroductionLow-back pain requires comprehensive care using a biopsychosocial model. The psychologic dimension plays an important role, but the link between sagittal alignment and a given psychopathological profile is little studied. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychopathological profiles and sagittal parameters of a population with low-back pain and to assess the link. Material and methods205 patients, with a mean age of 49.6 years (range, 18–70 years), presenting chronic common low-back pain without radicular involvement, were included prospectively. Mood scores comprised: the self-administered “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” (HAD), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Radiological parameters, measured on lateral full-spine radiographs, included: L1-S1 lordosis, T1-T12 kyphosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, and Roussouly type. ResultsMean HAM-A score was 16.1; 54% of patients had scores ≥14, indicating anxiety disorder. Mean HAM-D score was 10.8; 55% of patients had scores ≥10, indicating depressive disorder. Mean YMRS score was 2.6; only 1 patient had a score ≥20, indicating manic disorder. The 112 patients with HAM-A score >14 showed mean 51.6° L1-S1 lordosis (p=0.356), 48.3° T1-T12 kyphosis (p=0.590), –4.3mm C7 SVA (p=0.900), and 29.3° T1 slope (p=0.451). In case of HAM-A <14, there were no significant differences. The 113 patients with HAM-D score >10 showed significant differences in T1-T12 kyphosis (mean 49.0°; p<0.05) and T1 slope (30.2°; p<0.05); mean L1-S1 lordosis was 50.5° (p=0.861) and C7 SVA 1.6mm (p=0.462). In case of HAM-D <10, T1-T12 kyphosis was 45.5° (p<0.05) and T1 slope 26.2° (p<0.05); mean lordosis was 50.9° (p=0.861) and mean C7 SVA –7.1mm (p=0.259). Multivariate analysis found no significant link between Roussouly type and psychiatric scores: HAD (p=0.715), HAM-A (p=0.652), and HAM-D (p=0.902). ConclusionMore than 50% of patients with common low-back pain presented a mood disorder. Depressive disorder was associated with greater T1-T12 kyphosis and T1 slope. There was no relationship between psychiatric scores and overall sagittal alignment. Level of evidenceII.

Preliminary Results of Instantaneous Centre of Rotation Change after Thoracic Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

The instantaneous centre of rotation (ICR) is the centre of motion with zero velocity where a rigid body moves in a particular plane. ICR, as a dynamic measurement, gives more accurate results in terms of quality and quantity of the vertebral motions compared to range of motion (ROM). We aimed to determine the effect of thoracic instrumentation on cervical movement of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who had undergone thoracic level instrumentation by measuring pre-operative and post-operative ICR change in a pilot study. A total of 25 AIS patients were included in this study. C4-C5 and C6-C7 segmental ICR were determined by pre-operative and post-operative cervical flexion-extension radiographs. In addition, cervical sagittal parameters and global sagittal parameters were investigated. There was no statistically significant change in ICR location post-operatively in both x and y coordinates at C4-C5 segment (p: 0.326 and p: 0.946, respectively) and C6-C7 segment (p: 0.209, p: 0.086, respectively). There was a positive correlation between LCL and C4-C5 ICR y coordinate (r: 0.481), but not with C6-C7 ICR y coordinate (r: -0.2, p: 0.398). T5-T12 kyphosis decreased (p: 0.002) and T1 pelvic angle (0.003), SVA (0.02) and sacral slope (0.049) increased significantly post-operatively. T1S was correlated with LCL (r: 0.595, p: 0.002), T5-T12 kyphosis (r: 0.423, p: 0.035), SVA (r: 0.658, p<0.001) and C2-C7 SVA (r: 0.416, p: 0.039). The ICR for cervical region was not changed post-operatively in AIS patients with thoracic instrumentation. There was no relationship found between the development of post-operative cervical kyphosis or lordosis and ICR, which represents the quality and quantity of intervertebral motion. The T1 vertebra plays a key role for cervical, thoracic, and global parameters interaction.

Surgeon and SterEOS agreement of spinal sagittal plane parameters in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

To compare agreement between surgeons and sterEOS sagittal plane measurements. EOS radiographs of 74 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were reviewed. The measurements were generated by two surgeons and compared to sterEOS. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were calculated. Agreement was also analyzed for the following subgroups: Cobb angle < 70° vs ≥ 70°, lumbar modifier A vs B/C, and BMI of < 24.5kg/m2 vs ≥ 24.5kg/m2. Agreement was poor if the ICC was < 0.5, moderate if 0.5-0.75, good if 0.75-0.9, and excellent if > 0.9. Paired t tests were performed to compare the surgeon's and sterEOS means. For the surgeons, agreement was good (0.75-0.89) except for pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS), which were excellent (0.91-0.92). Agreement between the surgeons and sterEOS were good (0.78-0.9) except PT and SS, which were excellent (0.91-0.93). Agreement was negatively affected for T4-T12 kyphosis, PI, and SS in the ≥ 70°group, LL when BMI was ≥ 24.5kg/m2, and LL, PI, and SS in the lumbar modifier B/C group. The ICCs overlapped with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Paired t-test showed a significant difference for T4-T12 kyphosis (p < 0.001). This was also true in the < 70° group (p < 0.001), the ≥ 70° group (p = 0.04), and the BMI < 24.5kg/m2 group. PT was significantly different for the ≥ 70° group. There was good to excellent agreement between the surgeons and surgeons and sterEOS. Some variables may affect agreement. The surgeons overestimated T4-T12 kyphosis.

Risk Factors of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis-The Spinous Processes and Proximal Rod Contouring.

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), as one of the most discussed problems after corrective surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), is still not fully clarified and seems to be multifactorial. Biomechanical and a few clinical studies have shown the influence of destruction of posterior ligaments by resection of spinous processes and some parameters concerning rod contouring as risk factors for PJK. To verify these results, 192 patients with AIS and corrective surgery via a posterior approach between 2009 and 2017 were included. Radiographic parameters were analyzed preoperatively (preOP), postoperatively (postOP), and with a mean follow up (FU) of 27 months. The participants were divided into two groups (PJK group and non-PJK group). The incidence of PJK was 15.6%. Contrary to the results of biomechanical studies, we could not find any significant influence of the spinous process resection. However, the PJK group had significantly larger preOP T4–T12 kyphosis (31.1° ± 13.93° vs. 23.3° ± 14.93°, p = 0.016). Furthermore, the PJK group showed a significantly larger rod contour angle (RCA) (8.0° ± 4.44° vs. 5.9° ± 3.28°, p = 0.003) and mismatch of postOP proximal junctional angle (PJA) and RCA (3.5° ± 5.72° vs. 0.9° ± 4.86°, p = 0.010) compared to the non-PJK group. An increase in the mismatch of postOP PJA and RCA (OR = 1.14, p = 0.008) and a high RCA are risk factors for PJK and need to be focused on by surgeons.