Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) constitute a family of 18 cell signaling enzymes which are involved in the regulation of DNA-binding proteins and DNA repair. These enzymes catalyze the transfer of ADP-ribose units from NAD+ to a number of acceptor proteins and can also interact directly with their target proteins. Among the PARPs, PARP1 is the most abundant isoform and regulates the expression of diverse proinflammatory mediators, through its interaction with and modification of numerous transcription factors. Recent observations (including our group's) suggest that PARP1 is a cofactor for NF-κBdependent gene expression. Several studies in PARP1 KO mice have shown decreased expression of cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules, as well as reduced immune tissue infiltration in various models of inflammation, including streptomycin-induced diabetes and LPS-induced septic shock. Interestingly, in vivo studies have demonstrated that genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of PARP1 ameliorates the pathophysiological changes of experimental colitis. However, these studies failed to characterize the mechanism by which PARP1 inhibition is protective in colitis or the cell type in which Parp1 deletion has the most significant impact in IBD. Aim: Considering the essential role of PARP1 in the regulation of inflammation in IBD, we evaluated the effect of Parp1 deletion in T cellmediated colitis. Methods: The effect of Parp1 deficiency was evaluated in different models of colitis: (1) Adoptive T cell transfer: WT or Parp1-deficient CD4+CD45RBHigh T-cells were transferred into Rag2-/mice, or Rag2-/x Parp1-/double knockout (DKO) mice and (2) DSS-induced colitis in WT, Parp1-/-, Rag2-/-, and Rag2-/x Parp1-/DKO mice. In all models, we evaluated body weight loss, colonic morphology and expression of major pro-inflammatory cytokines. Results: In comparison to WT mice, Parp1-/were protected from the effects of DSS, with significantly lower weight loss, and greatly reduced proinflammatory cytokine expression. However, Parp1 deficiency in T cells was not protective in the CD4+CD45RBHigh T cell transfer model. Unexpectedly, Rag2-/x Parp1-/DKO showed only marginal improvement in both the WT CD4+CD45RBHigh T cell transfer and DSS models. Conclusions: Our preliminary data obtained with the adoptive T-cell transfer model of colitis indicate that Parp1 is dispensable in Naive and effector T-cells. While Parp1-/mice are protected from colitis resulting from DSS-induced epithelial damage, the lack of significant protection in the T cell transfer or DSS models of innate colitis in Rag2-/x Parp1-/DKO mice suggests that the pathogenic role of Parp1 in colitis may involve modulating interactions of more than one cell type, presumably innate immune cells (including colonic epithelial cells) and regulatory T cells.