T-cell Engager Research Articles

Effect of CD22-directed CAR-T cells secreting anti-CD19 T cell engagers on control of leukemia progression compared to tandem anti-CD19/CD22 CAR-T cells.

2550 Background: Antigen-specific cancer immunotherapies, based on engineered T cells bearing chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or the systemic administration of bispecific T cell-engagers (TCEs), have a significant impact on relapsed/refractory (R/R) B cell malignancies. However, a significant percentage of patients relapse following CAR-T or TCE therapy, with antigen loss accounting for up to one third of relapses/progressions. To avoid antigen loss after administration of single-targeted CAR-T cells and to minimize tumor escape, strategies targeting two antigens simultaneously have been developed and validated in both preclinical models and clinical trials. Nevertheless, despite lowering the risk of antigen loss, these strategies still have some limitations, mainly related to design and manufacturing challenges. Methods: In this context, we have generated the first dual-target strategy for hematological malignancies based on T cells bearing an anti-CD22 CAR and secreting an anti-CD19 T-cell engager antibody (CAR-STAb-T cells) and conducted a comprehensive preclinical study comparing its therapeutic potential with a previously validated anti-CD19/CD22 tandem CAR therapy (TanCAR-T) for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Results: We have demonstrated in both short- and long-term assays, using contact and non-contact co-culture systems, that CAR-STAb-T cells efficiently redirect bystander T cells, resulting in enhanced cytotoxic activity compared to that exhibited by TanCAR-T cells at very low E:T ratios. In addition, CAR-STAb-T cells induce more potent and faster cytotoxic responses than TanCAR-T cells in both short- and long-term co-culture assays when reproducing antigen-downmodulated conditions in vitro. In vivo assays conducted in NSG mice transplanted with a B-ALL patient-derived xenograft (PDX), followed by intravenous injection of CAR-STAb-T or TanCAR-T cells under a T cell-limiting experimental setting, also showed that CAR-STAb-T cells maintained a tighter control of tumor progression than TanCAR-T cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow. Conclusions: In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the combination of a cell surface CAR and a soluble TCE recognizing different antigens may be advantageous over the use of conventional multi-targeted strategies based on cell surface-anchored receptors. Furthermore, we have proven that a small number of transduced CAR-STAb-T cells is sufficient to redirect non-transduced bystander T cells specifically and efficiently in the presence of leukemia cells, providing a significant advantage over current dual-targeted CAR-T cell therapies. CAR-STAb-T cells could therefore become an alternative to CAR-T therapies for the treatment of R/R B cell malignancies, especially in lymphodepleted patients with low T cell counts.

Updated results from a phase 1/2 study of HPN328, a tri-specific, half-life (T1/2) extended DLL3-targeting T-cell engager in patients (pts) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other neuroendocrine cancers (NEC).

8090 Background: Delta-like canonical Notch ligand 3 (DLL3) is highly expressed on the cell surface of neuroendocrine carcinomas, which have few approved treatment options in the refractory, metastatic setting. HPN328 is DLL3-targeting T-cell engager. HPN328 has 3 binding domains including anti-DLL3 for target engagement, anti-albumin for half-life extension, and anti-CD3 for T cell engagement and activation. Methods: Pts with relapsed/refractory, metastatic SCLC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) and other NEC associated with DLL3 expression are eligible. Primary objectives are safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK). Secondary objectives are immunogenicity and efficacy. Overall response rate (ORR) is determined using modified RECIST v1.1 to include extracranial response assessment for pts treated with radiotherapy for brain metastases while on treatment. HPN328 is administered IV QW or Q2W with priming dose preceding target dose in higher dose cohorts. Results: As of January 5, 2024, 86 pts received HPN328 doses of 0.015-24 mg across 14 cohorts (SCLC [n = 54;63%]; other NEC [n = 32;37%]). The median (range) number of prior regimens was 3 (1-7); 83% previously received a PD-1/PD-L1 blocker. Treatment is ongoing in 24 of 46 (52%) pts in the dose optimization cohorts (1 mg priming dose with 12 or 24 mg target doses QW or Q2W). Treatment-related AEs in ≥ 10% of pts included CRS (59% [30% G1, 26% G2, 3% G3+]), dysgeusia (36%), fatigue (34%), diarrhea (19%), nausea (17%), vomiting (14%), decreased appetite and decreased neutrophil count (13% each), and weight decreased (11%). No G3-4 CRS was seen at target doses. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 9% of pts, all G1-2. The maximum tolerated priming dose was 1 mg; dose escalation of target dose continued up to 24 mg QW without reaching a maximum tolerated target dose. Among efficacy evaluable pts treated in dose optimization cohorts, the confirmed ORR in SCLC was 50% (12/24), with one complete response (CR). In NEC (other than NEPC) the confirmed ORR was 44% (4/9), with one CR. Four of eleven pts with NEPC had unconfirmed PRs in 1 mg priming dose cohorts, with 5 NEPC pts remaining on treatment > 20 weeks. HPN328 exhibited linear PK with dose-proportional increases in exposure and a median T1/2 of 71 hrs. Transient increases in cytokines up to 24 hrs post-dose and T-cell activation were observed. Conclusions: HPN328 is well tolerated and clinically active in SCLC, NEC, and NEPC. Current dose optimization cohorts have completed enrollment and data continue to mature; selection of a recommended phase 2 dose will be made based upon complete mature data. Updated safety and efficacy results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04471727 .

EVEREST-1: A seamless phase 1/2 study of A2B530, a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) logic-gated Tmod CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with solid tumors associated with CEA expression also exhibiting human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02 loss of heterozygosity (LOH).

TPS2698 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for treating solid tumors are challenging due to a lack of tumor-specific targets that discriminate cancer from normal cells. Previous studies using CEA T-cell receptors and T-cell engagers have resulted in dose-limiting, on-target, off-tumor toxicities (1,2). A2B530 is an autologous logic-gated, CEA-targeted Tmod CAR T-cell therapy that addresses the challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity by combining a CAR-activating receptor with a blocking receptor to discriminate tumor from normal cells (3). The activator recognizes CEA on the surface of both tumor and normal cells while specificity for tumor cells is provided by a blocker that binds HLA-A*02. In patients with both germline HLA-A*02 and tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH, the blocker prevents on-target, off-tumor toxicity on normal cells owing to retained HLA-A*02 expression (4). HLA-A*02 LOH can be detected using next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc.). With this definitive discriminator target, A2B530 can potentially provide a therapeutic window to treat patients with CEA-expressing solid tumors exhibiting HLA LOH. Methods: EVEREST-1 (NCT05736731) is a seamless, phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A2B530 in adult patients. Patients are enrolled through BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), a master prescreening study that identifies patients with HLA LOH at any time in the course of their disease. BASECAMP-1–eligible patients undergo leukapheresis and, when clinically appropriate, their banked T cells are manufactured for the EVEREST-1 study. The key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers associated with CEA expression: non-small cell lung, colorectal, or pancreatic cancers. Patients should have received ≥1 line of prior therapy such as checkpoint inhibitor, molecular targeted, or chemotherapy. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B530 and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The dose-escalation portion is based on the Bayesian optimal interval design. The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B530. Phase 2 will assess overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. As of January 29, 2024, 8 patients have been enrolled on EVEREST-1. A2B530 was successfully manufactured for all patients, and all patients have received A2B530 infusion, with the first patient dosed in May 2023. Dose escalation is ongoing. 1. Parkhurst, et al. Mol Ther. 2022. 2. Tabernero, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017. 3. Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol. 2020. 4. Sandberg, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05736731 .

DAREON-8: A phase I, open-label, dose escalation/expansion trial of the DLL3-targeting T-cell engager, BI 764532, combined with first-line (1L) standard of care (platinum, etoposide, and anti-PD-L1 antibody) in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung carcinoma (ES-SCLC).

TPS8127 Background: Platinum/etoposide chemotherapy in combination with anti-PD-L1 antibodies is the 1L standard of care (SoC) for pts with ES-SCLC. However, most pts relapse and subsequent treatment (Tx) options are limited. Hence, outcomes are poor with a 5-year survival rate of < 7%. Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is a Notch receptor ligand expressed on tumor cells but not on normal cells. BI 764532 is an IgG-like T-cell engager (TcE) that binds simultaneously to CD3 on T-cells and DLL3 on tumor cells, resulting in selective, T-cell mediated tumor cell lysis. An ongoing Phase I trial of BI 764532 (NCT04429087) in pts with pretreated DLL3-positive tumors demonstrated an overall response rate of 28%, a disease control rate of 54%, and a manageable safety profile. Here, we describe DAREON-8 (NCT06077500), a Phase I open-label dose escalation/expansion trial of BI 764532 plus SoC as a 1L Tx for pts with ES-SCLC. Methods: Pts will be recruited from ~20 sites into this two-part trial. In Part A (dose escalation), ~30 pts will receive escalating doses of intravenous BI 764532 (target dose after step-in dosing) plus carboplatin/etoposide + atezolizumab. Dose escalation will be guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control. Tx with BI 764532 will continue for 36 months, withdrawal or progressive disease (PD). The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BI 764532 and/or the recommended dose for expansion (RDE)/recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) for BI 764532 plus SoC. Safety, efficacy and/or PK assessments will guide the RDE/RP2D. The primary endpoint focuses on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the MTD evaluation period. In Part B (dose expansion), ~30 pts will receive BI 764532 at the RDE/RP2D determined in Part A for 36 months, withdrawal or PD and platinum/etoposide + either atezolizumab or durvalumab. The primary objective of Part B is to confirm the safety and tolerability of BI 764532 at the RDE/RP2D plus SoC Tx as measured by the occurrence of DLTs during the on-Tx period. Key inclusion criteria include confirmed ES-SCLC; no prior systemic treatment for ES-SCLC; and eligibility to receive platinum/etoposide chemotherapy + anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Key exclusion criteria include previous Tx with DLL3-targeting TcEs; persistent, unresolved toxicity from previous Txs; immunodeficiency, or systemic steroid or other immunosuppressive therapy ≤7 days prior to first dose of BI 764532; and significant cardio/cerebrovascular disease. Clinical trial information: NCT06077500 .

Combination therapy with the oncolytic virus CF33-CD19 and blinatumomab for the treatment of advanced solid tumors.

TPS2687 Background: CF33-CD19 is a novel chimeric vaccinia virus that selectively replicates in tumor cells and can provoke anti-tumor immunity. CF33-CD19 expresses a truncated and non-signaling CD19 protein on the surface of infected tumor cells before virus-mediated tumor lysis, labeling them for CD19-targeted therapies. Preclinical studies with CF33-CD19 have shown that combination therapy with CD19 targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells is more effective than either monotherapy in murine xenograft and syngeneic models [1]. Likewise, combination therapy with bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE)s that bind CD3-positive T cells and infected solid tumor cells that express de novo CD19, showed pronounced recruitment of T cells to the tumor microenvironment, resulting in tumor growth inhibition in mouse models. CD19xCD3 targeting BiTEs such as blinatumomab may offer an off-the-shelf alternative to adoptive cell therapies. This phase I study, called OASIS, dose escalates CF33-CD19 administered intravenously (IV) or intratumorally (IT) combined with blinatumomab in adults with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Methods: The OASIS study (NCT06063317) is enrolling patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy. Patients who have received prior treatment with a poxvirus based oncolytic virus or a bispecific CD19-directed CD3 T-cell engager are excluded. A safety run-in will evaluate the safety of CF33-CD19 monotherapy administered IT or IV before initiating the combination therapy regimen. Combination therapy will be administered in 28-day cycles with CF33-CD19 on days 1 and 15. Following viral transduction to promote de novo CD19 expression, blinatumomab is given on days 2-9 and 16-23 via a 7-day continuous infusion. Patients > 45 kg will receive 9 mcg of blinatumomab during the first week of cycle 1, then 28 mcg during the third week of cycle 1 and subsequent cycles. The study consists of two parts. Part 1 follows a 3+3 dose escalation scheme independently of each route of CF33-CD19 administration (IT and IV) with dose levels of CF33-CD19 ranging from 1.0x107 to 3.0x109 PFU. Part 2 is a cohort expansion in select indications at the optimal dose. The co-primary endpoints are safety and identification of the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 and iRECIST. Enrollment began in October 2023. 1. Park et al. Sci Transl Med. 2020 Sep 2;12(559):eaaz1863. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz1863. PMID: 32878978. Clinical trial information: NCT06063317 .

Phase 1 clinical trial of AMG 340, a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted T-cell engager with a novel low-affinity CD3 binding domain designed to mitigate toxicity for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

e14587 Background: PSMA, a transmembrane protein highly expressed on the surface of prostate cancer cells, is a validated target in prostate cancer; however, achieving a favorable therapeutic index has been challenging for PSMA-directed T-cell engagers (TCE’s). AMG 340, a PSMA-targeted TCE with a novel low-affinity CD3 binding domain specifically engineered to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS) toxicity and maintain efficacy was investigated in a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT04740034). Methods: Patients (pts) with mCRPC who had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy were treated with AMG 340 monotherapy (1.5–800 mg intravenously every 3 weeks [Q3W]) during dose escalation. The primary outcome measures were dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and pharmacokinetic profile. Secondary outcomes included prostate antigen specific (PSA) response and objective response per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Results: As of September 6, 2023, a total of 42 pts (mean ± SD age, 68.5±7.8 years) received AMG 340 step up dosing across 11 cohorts. At doses up to 800 mg Q3W, AMG 340 had a manageable side effect profile. Any grade TEAEs reported in ≥30% of pts included CRS (52%), nausea (52%), vomiting (52%), fatigue (48%), diarrhea (38%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (36%), increased alanine aminotransferase (33%), and hypocalcemia (31%). Treatment-related toxicities included CRS (52%; Grade 1, 26%; Grade 2, 24%; Grade ≥3, 2%) and thrombocytopenia (24%; Grade 2, 10%; Grade ≥3, 14%). Step dosing was implemented at doses >40 mg and successfully mitigated CRS incidence and severity after the first dose. The maximal tolerated dose was not reached, as increasing the dose beyond 800 mg was predicted to minimally increase the potential AMG 340 activity. Exposure increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner with no evidence of clinically significant anti-drug antibodies. AMG 340 demonstrated evidence for pharmacodynamic engagement as shown by cytokine induction. Of the 41 PSA evaluable pts, PSA responses were seen across dose levels (PSA50, n=4), but were not dose dependent. Eight of 42 pts remained on treatment after 6 months. Among 27 RECIST evaluable pts, no RECIST responses were observed (n=14 stable disease, n=0 partial or complete response). Conclusions: Despite reaching high doses, no dose response was observed, and AMG 340 did not generate sufficient clinical activity to warrant further exploration. However, AMG 340 demonstrated manageable CRS toxicity showing that decreased CD3-binding strength mitigates CRS, the main toxicity of TCEs. Clinical studies are ongoing evaluating the PSMA protein as a molecular target for prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04740034 .

Beyond Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: New Frontiers, New Challenges.

Chemoimmunotherapy is currently the preferred first-line treatment option for the majority of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer without driver genetic alterations. Most of these patients, however, will experience disease progression within the first year after treatment initiation and both patients and their physicians will be confronted with the dilemma of the optimal second-line treatment. Identification of molecular targets, such as KRASG12C, BRAFV600X, METexon14, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 mutations, and RET rearrangements offer therapeutic opportunities in pretreated patients with corresponding alterations. For those tumors that do not harbor oncogenic drivers, second-line treatment with docetaxel remains the current standard of care despite modest efficacy. Strategies to challenge docetaxel include the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with tyrosine inhibitors of multiple kinases or with DNA damage response inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and locoregional treatments for oligoprogressive disease. Next-generation immunotherapy strategies, such as T-cell engagers, immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptors, chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and T-cell receptor cell therapy are being currently investigated in the quest to reverse resistance to ICIs. Importantly, the advent of these new agents heralds a novel spectrum of toxicities that require both the physician's and the patient's education. Herein, we review current and future strategies aiming to outperform docetaxel after chemoimmunotherapy failure, and we provide practical information on how to best communicate to our patients the unique toxicity aspects associated with immunotherapy.

Correlative biomarker analyses for optimal therapeutic dose determination of ABBV-383, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

7532 Background: ABBV-383 is a BCMA x CD3 bispecific antibody with 2 high-affinity BCMA-binding domains and a low-affinity CD3 engaging arm that has been shown to decrease the negative impact of soluble BCMA (sBCMA) and drive sustained T-cell activation with reduced cytokine release in preclinical models of MM. Here, we describe correlative biomarker results of baseline and longitudinal sBCMA levels and immune profiles in the ongoing first-in-human trial that supports 60 mg Q4W as the optimal therapeutic dose of ABBV-383 monotherapy. Methods: Peripheral blood and serum samples from patients with RRMM enrolled in the phase 1 open-label, dose-expansion study (NCT03933735) who received ABBV-383 at 20, 40, or 60 mg Q3W or 60 mg Q4W were collected at baseline (post-dexamethasone, pre–ABBV-383), on treatment, and at disease progression. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry for immune cell populations, Luminex for cytokines, and electrochemiluminescence ligand binding for sBCMA. Results: Median sBCMA levels at baseline were highly variable among patients, but did not associate with clinical response (≥ partial response [PR]) to ABBV-383 at the selected optimal dose level of 60 mg Q4W (<PR: 244.7 ng/mL; ≥PR: 52.2 ng/mL; P=0.13). Reduction in sBCMA levels over time associated with clinical response (Cmin at cycle 5: <PR, 244.7 ng/mL; ≥PR, 4.7 ng/mL; P=0.04). ABBV-383 treatment led to a rapid and transient increase of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α (Cmax within cycle 1: 29, 349.5, 1375, 456.5 pg/mL, respectively), and promoted T-cell redistribution (89% reduction of CD8+ T cells from periphery), activation (1.9-fold increase in CD69+CD8+ T cells), and proliferation (2-fold increase in Ki67+CD8+ T cells) within cycle 1 in 60-mg Q4W-treated patients. The frequency of baseline CD8+ T-cell exhaustion (PD-1/TIM3) did not impact clinical response at the optimal dose level of 60 mg Q4W ABBV-383 (<PR: 3.5%; ≥PR: 3.9%; P=0.9). Peak induction levels of proinflammatory cytokines during cycle 1 correlated with occurrence of cytokine release syndrome (≥G1) as well as clinical response across dose levels. Conclusions: High-avidity BCMA binding coupled to low-affinity T-cell engagement distinguishes the resulting mechanism of action for ABBV-383. Responses to 60 mg Q4W ABBV-383 were independent of baseline sBCMA levels and resulted in rapid and transient proinflammatory cytokine production that promoted robust T-cell redistribution, activation, and proliferation, indicating that the optimal dose of ABBV-383 maximizes its clinical potential as a convenient, safe, and effective therapy for MM. Clinical trial information: NCT03933735 .

DeLLphi-301: Tarlatamab phase 2 trial in small cell lung cancer (SCLC)—Efficacy and safety analyzed by presence of brain metastasis.

8015 Background: Brain metastases affect 40%–70% of patients with SCLC. Tarlatamab, a BiTE (bispecific T-cell engager) immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3, demonstrated durable responses and promising survival outcomes in patients with previously treated SCLC (10 mg Q2W) (DeLLphi-301; NCT05060016; Ahn M-J, N Engl J Med 2023). Here, tarlatamab efficacy and safety in patients with baseline brain metastases from DeLLphi-301 are reported. Methods: The DeLLphi-301 study design has been published. Patients with treated, stable, asymptomatic brain metastases were included. Subgroup analyses for efficacy (blinded independent central review [BICR] assessments) and safety by presence or absence of baseline brain metastases were performed. Intracranial activity was assessed. Post enrollment, brain imaging was performed if clinically indicated. Results: As of 27 June 2023, 186 patients had received tarlatamab (ECOG PS: 0–1; median prior lines of therapy: 2; median follow-up: 13.6 months). 29% of patients (54/186) had treated and stable brain metastases at baseline. Most patients (91%) with brain metastases had received prior local radiotherapy; 6% each had received surgery only or both radiotherapy and surgery. Overall systemic objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1) was 45.3% in patients with brain metastases and 32.6% in patients without brain metastases (Table). Any grade immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome and associated neurological events occurred in 24.1% of patients with brain metastases and in 13.6% of patients without brain metastases; grade ≥ 3 events occurred in the 100 mg group only: 9.4% and 1.8%, respectively, and did not lead to tarlatamab discontinuation in any patient with brain metastases. Analysis of intracranial activity will be presented. Conclusions: Tarlatamab showed promising efficacy and a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with previously treated SCLC and stable brain metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT05060016 . [Table: see text]

Bispecific T-cell engagers in childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment for a wide variety of cancers yet its use has been relatively limited in childhood malignancies. With the introduction of bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE®) and chimeric antigen T-cell receptor technologies, previously refractory patients have attained remission, including molecularly negative states of disease, thus providing the possibility of long-term cure. Blinatumomab is a widely available CD3-CD19 BiTE that has dramatically changed the landscape of therapy for some children with precursor-B acute lymphoblastic leukemias (B-ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphomas. Challenges remain with using BiTE in a broader population although the appeal of now-confirmed reduced toxicity and deeper molecular remissions suggests that this approach will be an essential part of future treatment of childhood B-ALL. Herein, we review some of the pertinent literature covering clinical trials with blinatumomab and address future approaches and combination trials including BiTE.

Can teclistamab be safely administered in the community? A single-center experience.

e19502 Background: Majority of patients with multiple myeloma are treated in community settings. Teclistamab, a highly effective bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), was approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma but has the potentially lethal toxicity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Due to the risk of CRS, pharmacies/providers must be REMS-certified prior to prescribing treatment. CRS most commonly occurs after the 1st 3 doses with a median onset time of 2 days. The hospitals most comfortable administering and monitoring for BiTE toxicities are typically transplant/cellular therapy centers. Patients are hospitalized for 48 hours following the administration of first 3 doses. Subsequent outpatient treatment typically continues at these centers as well, limiting patient access to highly effective treatment. Whether teclistamab can safely be given in non-rapid response community infusion centers (CIC) with a less vigorous monitoring schedule is unknown. We established a monitoring guide to expand teclistamab accessibility to 18 (CIC) in our network. Methods: At AHN, a monitoring guide was devised for teclistamab (Table) based on existing safety data regarding the incidence and timing of CRS. Patients would be admitted for the 1st 3 doses and monitored for 48 hours after each dose. Starting with the 4th dose, teclistamab administration at CIC with no additional monitoring would be allowed if there were no CRS events with the immediately preceding dose. If the patient experienced a CRS event with the immediately preceding dose, the patient would be monitored for 1 hour until a dose was tolerated with no subsequent CRS events. Nursing and pharmacist education was arranged for all CIC regarding CRS identification and management. All CIC pharmacies were prospectively enrolled in the teclistamab REMS program at the time education was deployed. Prescribing providers were REMS certified as well. Results: Between 1/2023 and 1/2024, a total of 8 patients were treated at 6 CIC within AHN. Of those 6 centers, 3 were non-rapid response CIC. Out of the eight patients treated at local infusion centers, starting with the fourth teclistamab dose, none experienced CRS events. No additional safety occurred, and no patients were subsequently hospitalized for teclistamab toxicities. Conclusions: Teclistamab can be safely administered at CIC, including centers without rapid response capabilities, starting with the 4th dose after prior ramp-up administration. Post-injection monitoring may be reduced without increased incidence of CRS-related toxicities. Our monitoring guide may serve as a model for the safe administration of teclistamab and other BiTEs in CIC. [Table: see text]

Emerging Novel Functional Imaging and Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Current Treatment Sequencing Strategies After Immunotherapy.

The management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has advanced significantly in the past two decades. Many promising functional imaging modalities such as radiolabeled tracer targeting carbonic anhydrase IX and prostate-specific membrane antigen are under development to detect primary kidney tumors, stage systemic disease, and assess treatment response in RCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 and cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 have changed the treatment paradigm in advanced RCC. Trials investigating novel mechanisms such as LAG-3 immune checkpoint inhibition, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, and T-cell engagers targeting RCC-associated antigens are currently ongoing. With the rapidly changing treatment landscape of RCC, the treatment sequence strategies will continue to evolve. Familiarity with the toxicities associated with the therapeutic agents and how to manage them are essential to achieve optimal patient outcomes. This review summarizes the recent developments of functional imaging and immunotherapy strategies in RCC, and the evidence supports treatment sequencing.

Pharmacokinetics and biomarker analysis from a phase 1/2 open-label study of the anti-GPC3 T-cell engager SAR444200, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Pharmacokinetics and biomarker analysis from a phase 1/2 open-label study of the anti-GPC3 T-cell engager SAR444200, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Phase 1b study of tarlatamab in de novo or treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC).

5012 Background: NEPC is an aggressive form of prostate cancer with poor prognosis and no standard treatment approach. NEPC can be characterized by late, treatment-emergent transformation from adenocarcinoma to high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), in 10–15% of mCRPC patients (pts). DLL3 is overexpressed in high-grade NECs, including NEPC, and minimally expressed on normal tissue. Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy with clinical activity in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), binds DLL3 and CD3 resulting in T-cell mediated tumor lysis. Here, we report primary analysis data of tarlatamab in NEPC (NCT04702737). Methods: This is an open-label phase 1b study evaluating tarlatamab monotherapy in adult (≥18 years [y]) pts with metastatic de novo or treatment-emergent NEPC by histologic, genomic, or immunohistochemistry (IHC) criteria. The starting dose was the highest safe and tolerable dose in the phase 1 SCLC trial (NCT03319940). Safety was the primary objective; anti-tumor activity and pharmacokinetics were secondary objectives. Exploratory analysis of DLL3 expression was assessed by IHC using the Ventana SP347 assay. Results: As of 28 March 2023, 40 pts received ≥1 tarlatamab dose (1 mg step dose, 100 mg target dose). Median (range) age was 64.5 (43–83) y, prior lines of therapy was 3 (1–9), prostate specific antigen at baseline was 0.2 (0.0–5000.0) μg/L. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in all patients, with no fatal TRAE. Most common TRAEs were cytokine-release syndrome (CRS; 65.0%), pyrexia (52.5%) and dysgeusia (42.5%). CRS occurred primarily in treatment cycle 1; events were mostly grade 1–2 (one grade 3 event). Treatment discontinuation due to TRAE was low (7.5%). Tarlatamab serum exposures were consistent with tarlatamab SCLC studies. Objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) was 10.5% (95% CI, 2.9, 24.8); median progression free survival (mPFS) was 1.9 months (m) (95% CI, 1.7, 3.5). Retrospective DLL3 IHC analysis showed that 18 of 32 (56.3%) biopsy evaluable pts had ≥1% DLL3 tumor positivity (DLL3+). As of 24 January 2024, ORR in DLL3+ pts was 22.2% (95% CI, 6.4, 47.6); durations of response in the 4 pts with response were 25.8 m, 9.2 m, 5.5 m, 3.7 m; mPFS in DLL3+ pts was 3.75 m (95% CI, 1.87, 11.01). Efficacy is shown in Table. Conclusions: Findings from this phase 1 study of tarlatamab in pts with NEPC demonstrated manageable safety with encouraging anti-tumor activity in DLL3 expressing NEPC. Further investigation is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04702737 . [Table: see text]

Educating and empowering health care teams who present to the hospital to recognize and intervene on cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in patients on bispecific t-cell engager therapy (BiTEs): A quality improvement study.

e23212 Background: Treatment of oncologic disease with Bispecific T-Cell Engager antibodies (BiTEs) are an emerging novel immunotherapy with demonstrated efficacy in multiple hematologic malignancies. Notable side effects of BiTE therapy include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), which can be life-threatening and must be rapidly identified. We aim to fill knowledge gaps surrounding CRS and ICANS for medical providers, particularly considering increased use of BiTE therapy. We hope that educating providers will allow faster recognition and treatment and will improve patient outcomes. Methods: Our study focused on the impact of educational presentations on awareness and identification of CRS/ICANS. Our intervention targeted the residents and attendings in the emergency department and the nurses, advanced practice providers, and hospitalists in the bone marrow transplant (BMT) unit at Stony Brook University Hospital. Anonymous surveys consisting of 9 multiple choice questions were conducted to assess baseline foundational knowledge of CRS/ICANS. QI consisted of a 15-minute educational presentation for both groups. The same surveys were repeated following the presentations to assess improvement in overall knowledge of CRS/ICANS. A two tailed independent T test was used to calculate significance. Results: The average pre-survey score for the emergency department (N = 37) was 39%. The average presurvey score for the BMT department (N = 13) was 45%. Significant improvements in scores after intervention were shown in both the emergency department (39% vs 66%, p = 0.0001) and the BMT department (45% vs 68%, p = 0.0006). Conclusions: Education among emergency department and hospitalist providers is essential in improving management of CRS and ICANS in patients treated with BiTEs. This quality improvement initiative confirmed a knowledge gap in CRS and ICANS amongst our healthcare teams. By providing educational resources to both departments, there was a significant improvement in this gap. Future directions for continued improvement in the detection and management of CRS/ICANS include patient medication identification cards, a central repository of treatment protocols, algorithms, and toxicities associated with BiTEs, and expanding our educational curriculum which are all currently under development at Stony Brook University Hospital.

Phase I/II trial of LAVA-1207, a novel bispecific gamma-delta T-cell engager alone, or with low dose IL-2 or pembrolizumab, in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

TPS2672 Background: LAVA-1207 is a humanized bispecific antibody that binds with high affinity to the Vδ2 chain of Vγ9Vδ2-T cells and to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). It comprises a heterodimer of two fusion proteins, each consisting of a VHH linked to a human IgG1 Fc domain. Preclinical evidence demonstrates that, upon binding both targets, LAVA-1207 leads to potent Vγ9Vδ2-T cell degranulation and cytolytic activity against PSMA-expressing prostate cancer cells. IL-2 is an immune modulator which has been shown to support expansion of activated Vγ9Vδ2-T cells. PD-1 is an inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor that can dampen (Vγ9Vδ2-) T cell reactivity, suggesting that pembrolizumab could potentiate the effect of LAVA-1207. Methods: This trial is a phase 1/2a open label study with a 3+3 design in patients with refractory mCRPC to assess the safety of LAVA-1207 alone or with low dose IL-2 or with pembrolizumab, and to determine the recommended Phase 2a dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives include evaluation of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and preliminary antitumor activity. Exploratory endpoints include evaluation of the effect of study treatment on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). LAVA-1207 is administered IV every two weeks. Two parallel cohorts assessing LAVA-1207 with low dose subcutaneous IL-2 have been implemented: (1) single IL-2 administration and (2) three IL-2 administrations on consecutive days per cycle for up to four cycles. An additional dose escalation arm evaluates LAVA-1207 in combination with pembrolizumab, 400mg Q6W, IV. Patients with mCRPC that have failed at least one prior AR therapy and taxane-based chemotherapy (unless deemed medically unsuitable to receive a taxane) will be enrolled on the study. Patients should have progressive disease either by PSA or by RECIST 1.1 or appearance of 2 or more bone metastases. Patients must have ECOG performance status of 0-1. PSMA-PET is performed at baseline. Paired biopsies are requested to further assess LAVA-1207 activity. Dose escalation is ongoing. Expansion arm(s) will be included based on available data from part 1 of the study and may include one or more of LAVA-1207, LAVA-1207 with low dose IL-2, or LAVA-1207 in combination with pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT05369000 .

Outpatient blinatumomab with digital monitoring in patients with measurable residual disease positive (MRD+) B-ALL in a phase 4 study.

6544 Background: Blinatumomab, a CD3/CD19-directed BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) molecule, is an effective therapy for patients (pts) with MRD+ B-ALL. Hospitalization is recommended for days (D) 1–3 of cycle (C) 1 and D1–2 of C2 for these pts receiving blinatumomab to monitor for serious adverse events (SAEs). This phase 4 study evaluated the safety and feasibility of outpatient (outpt) digital monitoring to replace hospitalization in pts with MRD+ B-ALL (NCT04506086). Methods: Enrolled adults with MRD+ B-ALL in complete remission received continuous intravenous (cIV) blinatumomab at 28 μg/day. Current Health Wearable Monitoring System (CHWMS) was worn by pts at home for D1–3 (C1) and D1–2 (C2), in the presence of a caregiver, and provided heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation; a separate patch monitored temperature. Manual blood pressure measurements were taken every 3-6 hrs. Vital signs (VS) were streamed to a provider smartphone/laptop; changes outside a predetermined threshold generated audible alarms. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade (G) ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, or any adverse event (AE) requiring hospitalization during the monitoring period. Results: As of 12/15/2023, 9 pts (median age 43 [20-73] years) received outpt blinatumomab for (completed C1, n=7; C2, n=6). During outpt monitoring, dose interruption was reported in 5 of 9 pts (1 pt had 2 dose interruptions: AE, n=2; dose administration error, n=2; other, n=2). CRS was reported in 2 pts (SAE, n=1; G≥3, n=0; led to interruption, n=1) and neurologic events in 4 pts (SAE, n=0; G≥3, n=0; led to interruption, n=0). Two pts experienced AEs requiring hospitalization (CRS, n=1; fever, n=1). Most VS changes were physiological or from routine pt activity. Median (range) number of alarms triggered/pt was 79 (12-135); among 3 pts, 1.2%, 5.1% and 8.9% of alarms led to therapeutic intervention (Table). Conclusions: To date, outpt administration of cIV blinatumomab in pts with MRD+ B-ALL was feasible and safe with appropriate outpt digital monitoring. Study enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04506086 . [Table: see text]

Associations of T-cell fitness prior to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) and bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) therapies and efficacy/toxicity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

7549 Background: While CART and BiTE have led to unprecedented responses in RRMM, some patients (pts) do not respond or have short-lived responses. Currently no predictive markers exist to identify these pts. This study explored pretreatment T-cell fitness and efficacy/toxicity in RRMM using a novel single-cell secretome analysis. We hypothesized that pretreatment Polyfunctional Strength Index (PSI) may predict efficacy to BCMA-directed T-cell therapies. Methods: We included 14 RRMM pts treated with idecabtagene vicleucel or teclistamab at Yale Cancer Center with ≥6 mos post-treatment follow-up. Peripheral blood prior to treatment was frozen and then PBMC’s thawed for analysis. PSI, a metric for T-cell fitness combining polyfunctional T-cells % with the intensity of secreted cytokines, was obtained using the IsoPlexis’ Single-Cell Secretome Platform. The overall PSI was an average of CD4+ and CD8+ PSIs. Response was assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and response duration was defined as time from response to disease progression. Responder (R) was defined as ≥very good partial response for ≥6 mos. Non-responder (NR) was defined as stable or progressive disease ≤3 mos. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune-effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded using the American Society for Transplantation & Cellular Therapy system. Statistics were performed with Mann-Whitney U test using GraphPad PRISM v.9. Results: There were 7 pts in R group (2 BiTE & 5 CART) and 7 pts in NR group (3 BiTE & 4 CART). Median follow-up time was 13.5 mos(range, 7-27). Median age at treatment was 64 yrs in R and 63 yrs in NR. Extramedullary disease (EM) was present in 14.3%(n=1) in R and 71.4%(n=5) in NR. High-risk cytogenetics, defined as del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), 1q gain/amplification and del1p, were seen in 42.9%(n=3) in R and 85.7%(n=6) in NR. Median prior lines of therapy was 6(range, 4-9) in R and 8(range, 4-10) in NR. CRS/ICANS occurred 85.7%(n=6) in R and 28.6%(n=2) in NR. Overall PSI was 184 in R and 91 in NR(p=0.1649). CD4+ PSI was 160 in R and 75 in NR(p=0.1649). CD8+ PSI was 207 in R and 108 in NR(p=0.1981). Overall PSI was 143 in CRS/ICANS and 130 in no CRS/ICANS(p=0.7546). Conclusions: Overall PSI, CD4+ PSI and CD8+ PSI were 1.9-2.1 times higher in R compared to NR and overall PSI was slightly higher in CRS/ICANS compared to no CRS/ICANS though the difference was not statistically significant. One limitation was a small sample size and thus testing PSI in a larger cohort might yield statistically significant results. The NR group had more high-risk cytogenetics and higher EM. One confounder could be that measuring peripheral T-cell fitness may not be sufficient to predict response in EM where spatial determinants of T-cell influx play a role.

CRPA1A2: A novel TCR-based T-cell engager targeting MAGEA1-positive solid tumors.

e14589 Background: MAGEA1, identified as a cancer/testis antigen, is highly expression in various solid tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, but absent in normal tissues except male germ cells and placenta, both of which lacking HLA class molecules. This selective expression of HLA-MAGEA1 epitope makes it a promising target for cancer therapy. However, its intracellular localization poses a challenge for conventional antibodies designed to target surface-expressed antigens. TCR-based T-cell engagers, such as Tebentafusp, overcome this hurdle by targeting intracellular protein-derived peptides presented on cancer cell surfaces via HLA, enabling precise cytotoxic T cell attacks. Notably, Tebentafusp has shown significant clinical benefits by improving survival rates in metastatic uveal melanoma, underscoring the efficacy of TCR-based T-cell engagers in treating MAGEA1-positive tumors. Methods: We have developed an advanced structural format, CR62, consisting of a anti-CD3 single chain fragment, a soluble modified TCR, and an Fc region. Additionally, the use of CorreGene's SMART-TCR system has facilitated the acquisition of TCRs with high affinities in the pico-molar range. By leveraging CR62 and a high-affinity TCR, we have conceptualized the TCR-based T-cell engager, CRPA1A2. Comprehensive preclinical assessments have been conducted to evaluate CRPA1A2's safety and efficacy. Results: CRPA1A2 is designed to specifically target the HLA-A*02:01-restricted MAGEA1 epitope, effectively inhibiting tumor growth. CRPA1A2 is characterized by its exceptional soluble expression in CHO cells, minimal homodimer miss-assembly and simplifying purification. It is strategically engineered with a high-affinity TCR and a low-affinity anti-CD3 scFv to optimize the efficacy and safety. In vitro studies, CRPA1A2 showed strong ability to eliminate tumor cells and induce IFN-γ release, effective even at low MAGEA1 epitope densities, with a therapeutic window that spans over three orders of magnitude, suggesting a 1000-fold greater activity against antigen-positive cancer cells compared to antigen-negative cells. In vivo, using a tumor-bearing mouse model, CRPA1A2 has been shown to recruit T cells into subcutaneous solid tumors, expand CD8+ T cell populations, and significantly reduce tumor mass. Notably, CRPA1A2 has an extended half-life of 120 hours and demonstrates preferential accumulation in tumor tissues, thereby enhancing its therapeutic potential. Moreover, the safety assessments for CRPA1A2 highlight its exceptional specificity, with in vitro studies showing no evidence of off-target toxicity, on-target off-tumor toxicity, or alloreactivity and favorable tolerance in mice during in vivo studies. Conclusions: CRPA1A2 has emerged as a superior TCR-based T-cell engager with exceptional antitumor efficacy and promising safety profile.

A phase 1/2, open-label, multicenter trial investigating the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antineoplastic activity of IPH6501, a first-in-class NK cell engager, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory CD20-expressing non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

TPS7095 Background: The therapeutic landscape for relapsed and/or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is evolving to include targeted T-cell based immunotherapies. However, there remains an unmet medical need for patients who are refractory to, relapsing from, or are ineligible for these therapies. Leveraging natural killer (NK) cells emerges as a promising strategy, as demonstrated in a Phase 1 study with IPH6101/SAR’579 in R/R AML (Stein, ASCO 2023; Bajel, ASH 2023), and offers a novel approach that could complement or provide an alternative to T-cell therapies. IPH6501 is a first-in-class tetraspecific antibody-based NK cell engager that simultaneously targets the CD16a and NKp46 receptors on NK cells and CD20 on B-NHL cells. It also includes an engineered IL-2 variant designed with mutations to avoid binding to CD25 (IL-2Rα), limiting Treg activation and potential IL-2 related side effects, whilst inducing NK proliferation. In preclinical animal models, IPH6501 boosted NK cell proliferation and activation, and CD20+ target cell elimination in peripheral blood and tissues, at well-tolerated doses. In samples obtained from R/R B-NHL patients, IPH6501 demonstrated greater killing efficacy compared to a CD3xCD20 T-cell engager, and yet lower cytokine secretion, suggesting a potentially safer profile. Methods: This is a global first-in-human, multicenter, open-label Phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety profile (DLTs and MTD), tolerability according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0 and to determine the RP2D of IPH6501 for patients with B-NHL (NCT06088654). Secondary objectives are to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile and evaluate the immunogenicity of IPH6501. Eligible subjects are aged ≥18 years with advanced, histologically confirmed, CD20+ B-NHL with an ECOG PS ≤2, and without established alternative therapy. Subjects must have received ≥2 prior systemic therapies which may have included astem cell transplant or CAR-T cell therapy. The Phase 1 part of the study will consist of a dose escalation part which will follow a3+3 design to determine the MTD or the highest dose to be tested as defined in protocol if the MTD has not been reached, and a dose assessment part to randomize ≥2 dose levels to determine the RP2D. The Phase 2 part will enroll one or more cohorts of selected B-cell NHL subtypes to be determined at a later stage. Up to 184 subjects will be enrolled, and the study is open in the United States, Australia and Europe. Clinical trial information: NCT06088654 .