Target Systolic Blood Pressure Research Articles

Highlights of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Studies Presented at the 2023 American College of Cardiology Conference.

To summarize selected late-breaking science on cardiovascular (CV) disease prevention presented at the 2023 American College of Cardiology (ACC) conference. The CLEAR outcomes randomized control trial (RCT) compared bempedoic acid to placebo in patients at high-risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or prevalent CVD and statin intolerance for CV outcomes. The YELLOW III was a single-arm study that evaluated the effect of Evolocumab on coronary plaque characteristics in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). A cohort evaluated the association between a self-reported low-carbohydrate high-fat (ketogenic) diet and serum lipid levels as compared to a standard diet. The LOADSTAR trial compared CV outcomes with targeted low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) approach vs. high-intensity statin in patients with CAD. The PCDS statin cluster randomized trial compared the effectiveness of an electronic reminder to the clinician on a high-intensity statin use among patients with a history of ASCVD as compared to no reminder. A prospective cohort study compared the extent of coronary atherosclerosis among lifelong endurance athletes and healthy non-athletes. A causal artificial intelligence study combined polygenic risk scores with data from large CV prevention RCTs to guide systolic blood pressure and LDL-C reduction targets to reach average CV risk. The ACCESS trial evaluated the impact of eliminating copayment for low-income older adults in Canada with chronic CV diseases on composite CV outcomes. A pooled analysis of 3 large RCTs evaluated the association between residual inflammatory risk and CV outcomes, as compared to residual elevated cholesterol risk in patients receiving statin therapy. A Phase 2B RCT compared the efficacy of an oral PCSK9i, MK-0616, in reducing LDL-C as compared to a placebo. The late-breaking clinical science presented at the 2023 conference of the ACC paves the way for an evidence-based alternative to statin therapy and provides data on several common clinical scenarios encountered in daily practice.

Machine-learning-based high-benefit approach versus conventional high-risk approach in blood pressure management.

In medicine, clinicians treat individuals under an implicit assumption that high-risk patients would benefit most from the treatment ('high-risk approach'). However, treating individuals with the highest estimated benefit using a novel machine-learning method ('high-benefit approach') may improve population health outcomes. This study included 10 672 participants who were randomized to systolic blood pressure (SBP) target of either <120 mmHg (intensive treatment) or <140 mmHg (standard treatment) from two randomized controlled trials (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial, and Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure). We applied the machine-learning causal forest to develop a prediction model of individualized treatment effect (ITE) of intensive SBP control on the reduction in cardiovascular outcomes at 3 years. We then compared the performance of high-benefit approach (treating individuals with ITE >0) versus the high-risk approach (treating individuals with SBP ≥130 mmHg). Using transportability formula, we also estimated the effect of these approaches among 14 575 US adults from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1999-2018. We found that 78.9% of individuals with SBP ≥130 mmHg benefited from the intensive SBP control. The high-benefit approach outperformed the high-risk approach [average treatment effect (95% CI), +9.36 (8.33-10.44) vs +1.65 (0.36-2.84) percentage point; difference between these two approaches, +7.71 (6.79-8.67) percentage points, P-value <0.001]. The results were consistent when we transported the results to the NHANES data. The machine-learning-based high-benefit approach outperformed the high-risk approach with a larger treatment effect. These findings indicate that the high-benefit approach has the potential to maximize the effectiveness of treatment rather than the conventional high-risk approach, which needs to be validated in future research.

Effect of out-hospital blood pressure management on prognosis of patients with acute aortic syndrome complicated with hypertension after TEVAR

Objective: To investigate the influence of blood pressure control after discharge on prognosis of patients with acute aortic syndrome (AAS) complicated with hypertension who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: This is a retrospective case analysis. Patients diagnosed with AAS complicated with hypertension and undergoing TEVAR in Northern Theater Command General Hospital from June 2002 to December 2021 were consecutively enrolled. Average systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the occurrence of endpoint events were recorded at one month, one year and every 2 years after TEVAR. According to the patients' average SBP, patients with average SBP<140 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) or<150 mmHg were divided into the target blood pressure achievement group, and the others were divided into target blood pressure non-achievement group. Endpoint events included all-cause death, aortic death, stroke, renal insufficiency, aortic related adverse events and a composite of these events (overall clinical adverse events), and re-accepting TEVAR. The incidence of endpoint events was compared between the two groups at each follow-up period. Results: A total of 987 patients were included, aged (55.7±11.7) years, including 779 male (78.9%). When the cutoff value was 140 mmHg, the rate of average target SBP achievement was 71.2% (703/987) at one month, 66.7% (618/927) during 1st to 12th month and 65.1% (542/832) from the first year to the third year after TEVAR. The proportion of patients taking≥2 antihypertensive agents was higher in the group of target blood pressure non-achievement group than the target blood pressure achievement group after TEVAR at 1 month (74.3% (211/284) vs.65.9% (463/703), P=0.010) and during 1st to 12th month (71.5% (221/309) vs. 63.6% (393/618), P=0.016). There were no statistical differences in the all-cause deaths, stroke, aortic related adverse events, and repeat TEVAR between the two groups (All P>0.05) during above follow-up periods. When the cutoff value was 150 mmHg, the rate of target SBP achievement was 89.3% (881/987) at one month, 85.2% (790/927) during 1st to 12th month and 85.6%(712/832) from the first year to the third year after TEVAR. The incidence of clinical total adverse events (8.8% (12/137) vs. 4.2% (33/790), P=0.021) and repeat TEVAR (4.4% (6/137) vs. 1.0% (8/790), P=0.003) in target blood pressure non-achievement group were significantly higher than the target blood pressure achievement group during 1st to 12th month after TEVAR. The incidence of all-cause deaths (5.8% (7/120) vs. 2.4% (17/712), P=0.037) in the target blood pressure non-achievement group was significantly higher than the target blood pressure achievement group from the first year to the third year follow-up period, but there were no statistical differences in the incidence of clinical total adverse events between the two group (P>0.05). Conclusion: Among TEVAR treated AAS patients complicated with hypertension, the average SBP more than 150 mmHg post discharge is associated with increased risk of adverse events. Ideal blood pressure control should be encouraged to improve the outcome of these patients.

Association of long-term time in target range for systolic blood pressure with cardiovascular risk in the elderly: a Chinese veteran cohort study.

Short-term blood pressure (BP) time in target range (TTR) independently predicts cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in adults. However, there are limited data regarding long-term TTR for BP among elderly participants. We aimed to determine whether future CV risk varies for those who can maintain a long-term systolic BP (SBP) target range by assessing TTR in elderly individuals with hypertension. The Chinese veteran cohort study included 943 elderly participants with hypertension aged over 75 years. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of CV events during annual visits. Time in target range was estimated over 15 years of follow-up using linear interpolation. The target range was defined as 120-140 mmHg according to guidelines. The association between SBP TTR and CV outcomes was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. During the 15 year follow-up, the probability of CV events gradually decreased with increasing TTR for SBP. After multivariable adjustment for traditional CV risk factors and mean BP, comparing the highest vs. lowest quartiles of TTR for SBP, the hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] were 0.424 (0.289-0.624) for the primary outcome. For each 1 SD increase in TTR, the risk of the primary outcome decreased by 25.4% (HR: 0.746; 95% CI: 0.666-0.834). Consistent findings were observed in sensitivity analyses. Greater long-term TTR for SBP was associated with a decreased risk of CV events in elderly individuals independent of mean BP, suggesting that SBP TTR might serve as a modifiable risk factor for future CV health in elderly patients with hypertension. This ongoing Chinese veteran cohort study adds to the understanding of the relationship between higher long-term systolic blood pressure (SBP) time in target range (TTR) and cardiovascular benefits among elderly individuals with hypertension.

Effect of small vessel disease severity on blood pressure management after endovascular therapy in the BP TARGET trial.

Acute ischaemic stroke patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), including cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), have worse outcomes. The effect was investigated of two blood pressure strategies (intensive vs. standard) and blood pressure variability (BPV) after reperfusion according to CSVD burden in the BP TARGET trial. Patients with available magnetic resonance imaging at baseline were included. CMBs were described as absent or present and WMH severity was described according to the Fazekas classification (0-1, absent-mild; 2-3, moderate to severe). Outcomes consisted of any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at 24 h and favorable outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score between 0 and 2). In all, 246 patients were included. The intensive systolic blood pressure target was not associated with lower rates of ICH or favorable outcome according to CSVD subgroups (all p values >0.35). Several BPV parameters were associated with increased odds of ICH in patients with CMBs but not in patients without CMBs (diastolic blood pressure coefficient of variation, odds ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-3.77, in patients with ≥1 CMB vs. 0.94, 95% CI 0.68-1.31, in patients without CMBs, phet =0.026). Several diastolic BPV parameters were associated with worse outcomes in patients with severe WMHs but not in patients without WMHs (diastolic blood pressure coefficient of variation, odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.17-0.61, in patients with severe WMHs vs. 1.09, 95% CI 0.67-1.79, in patients without WMHs; phet =0.003). No effect of the intensive systolic blood pressure management strategy was found on ICH occurrence or functional outcome according to CSVD burden. BPV was associated with higher odds of ICH in patients with CMBs and worse outcome in patients with moderate-to-severe WMHs.

Asociación del nivel de ácido úrico en suero con los beneficios del control intensivo de la presión arterial

Introduction and objectivesIntensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control improved outcomes in the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Whether the serum uric acid concentration at baseline alters the benefits of intensive SBP control is unknown. MethodsThe STEP trial was a randomized controlled trial that compared the effects of intensive (SBP target of 110 to<130mmHg) and standard (SBP target of 130 to <150mmHg) SBP control in Chinese patients aged 60 to 80 years with hypertension. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular disease events. This post hoc analysis was performed to examine whether the effects of intensive SBP intervention differed by the baseline uric acid concentration using 2 models: restricted cubic spline curves and subgroup analyses, both based on the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model in the analysis of the primary outcome and secondary outcomes (excluding all-cause death). In the analysis of all-cause death, the Cox regression model was used. We also examined the change in the follow-up uric acid concentrations. ResultsOverall, the risk of the primary outcome rose as the cumulative uric acid concentration increased in both the intensive and standard treatment groups. Patients with intensive treatment had a lower multivariable-adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio for the primary outcome, but with a wide overlap of 95%CI. Next, we stratified patients according to their baseline uric acid concentration (tertile 1 [T1], <303.0μmol/L; tertile 2 [T2], 303.0 to <375.8μmol/L; and tertile 3 [T3], ≥375.8μmol/L). Subgroup analyses using tertiles provided HRs and 95%CI in T1 (HR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.36–0.86; P=.008), T2 (HR, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.56–1.14; P=.22) and T3 (HR, 0.86; 95%CI, 0.60–1.21; P=.39), with an interaction P value of .29. The results for most of the secondary outcomes followed the same trends. ConclusionsThere was no evidence that the benefit of the intensive SBP control differed by baseline uric acid concentrations. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (Identifier: NCT03015311).

Cardiovascular risk reduction with integrated care: results of 8 years follow up

BackgroundCare groups organize integrated cardiovascular risk management programs in primary care for high risk patients. Results of long term cardiovascular risk management are scarce. The aim was to describe changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and smoking between 2011 and 2018 in patients participating in an integrated program for cardiovascular risk management organized by a care group in the Netherlands.AimTo explore whether long-term participation in an integrated cardiovascular risk management program could lead to the improvement of 3 important risk factors for cardiovascular disease.MethodsA protocol was developed for delegated practice nurse activities. A multidisciplinary data registry was used for uniform registration. The care group organized annual education for general practitioners and practice nurses on cardiovascular topics and regular meetings for practice nurses only to discuss complex patient cases and implementation issues. From 2015 onwards, the care group started with practice visitations to discuss performance and support practices with organizing integrated care.ResultsIn patients eligible for primary prevention as well as for secondary prevention similar trends were observed: lipid modifying and blood pressure lowering medication increased, mean low density lipoprotein cholesterol and mean systolic blood pressure decreased, patients on target for low density lipoprotein cholesterol and systolic blood pressure increased and the proportion of non-smokers with both low density lipoprotein cholesterol and systolic blood pressure on target increased. Improved registration between 2011 and 2013 was partly responsible for the sharp increase of patients on target for low density lipoprotein cholesterol and systolic blood pressure.ConclusionIn patients participating in an integrated cardiovascular risk management program, we saw annual improvements in 3 important cardiovascular risk factors between 2011 and 2018.

Systolic blood pressure time in target range and long-term outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

The relationship between the degree of systolic blood pressure (SBP) control and outcomes remains unclear in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Current control metrics may not take into account the potential effects of SBP fluctuations over time on patients. This study was a post-hoc analysis of the surgical treatment of ischemic heart failure trial which enrolled 2,136 participants with ICM. Our SBP target range was defined as 110 to 130 mm Hg and the time in target range (TTR) was calculated by linear interpolation. A total of 1,194 patients were included. Compared with the quartile 4 group (TTR 77.87%-100%), the adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of all-cause mortality were 1.32 (0.98-1.78) for quartile 3 group (TTR 54.81%-77.63%), 1.40 (1.03-1.90) for quartile 2 group (TTR 32.59%-54.67%), and 1.53 (1.14-2.04) for quartile 1 group (TTR 0%-32.56%). Per 29.28% (1-SD) decrement in TTR significantly increased the risk of all-cause mortality (1.15 [1.04-1.26]). Similar results were observed in the cardiovascular (CV) mortality and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality plus CV rehospitalization, and in the subgroup analyses of either coronary artery bypass grafting or medical therapy, and different baseline SBP. In patients with ICM, the higher TTR was significantly associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality, CV mortality and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality plus CV rehospitalization, regardless of whether the patient received coronary artery bypass grafting or medical therapy, and the level of baseline SBP. TTR may be a surrogate metric of long-term SBP control in patients with ICM.

Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Regional Changes in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Biomarkers

Little is known about the associations of strict blood pressure (BP) control with microstructural changes in small vessel disease markers. To investigate the regional associations of intensive vs standard BP control with small vessel disease biomarkers, such as white matter lesions (WMLs), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and cerebral blood flow (CBF). The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) is a multicenter randomized clinical trial that compared intensive systolic BP (SBP) control (SBP target <120 mm Hg) vs standard control (SBP target <140 mm Hg) among participants aged 50 years or older with hypertension and without diabetes or a history of stroke. The study began randomization on November 8, 2010, and stopped July 1, 2016, with a follow-up duration of approximately 4 years. A total of 670 and 458 participants completed brain magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and follow-up, respectively, and comprise the cohort for this post hoc analysis. Statistical analyses for this post hoc analysis were performed between August 2020 and October 2022. At baseline, 355 participants received intensive SBP treatment and 315 participants received standard SBP treatment. The main outcomes were regional changes in WMLs, FA, MD (in white matter regions of interest), and CBF (in gray matter regions of interest). At baseline, 355 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.7 [8.0] years; 200 men [56.3%]) received intensive BP treatment and 315 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.0 [8.4] years; 199 men [63.2%]) received standard BP treatment. Intensive treatment was associated with smaller mean increases in WML volume compared with standard treatment (644.5 mm3 vs 1258.1 mm3). The smaller mean increases were observed specifically in the deep white matter regions of the left anterior corona radiata (intensive treatment, 30.3 mm3 [95% CI, 16.0-44.5 mm3]; standard treatment, 80.5 mm3 [95% CI, 53.8-107.2 mm3]), left tapetum (intensive treatment, 11.8 mm3 [95% CI, 4.4-19.2 mm3]; standard treatment, 27.2 mm3 [95% CI, 19.4-35.0 mm3]), left superior fronto-occipital fasciculus (intensive treatment, 3.2 mm3 [95% CI, 0.7-5.8 mm3]; standard treatment, 9.4 mm3 [95% CI, 5.5-13.4 mm3]), left posterior corona radiata (intensive treatment, 26.0 mm3 [95% CI, 12.9-39.1 mm3]; standard treatment, 52.3 mm3 [95% CI, 34.8-69.8 mm3]), left splenium of the corpus callosum (intensive treatment, 45.4 mm3 [95% CI, 25.1-65.7 mm3]; standard treatment, 83.0 mm3 [95% CI, 58.7-107.2 mm3]), left posterior thalamic radiation (intensive treatment, 53.0 mm3 [95% CI, 29.8-76.2 mm3]; standard treatment, 106.9 mm3 [95% CI, 73.4-140.3 mm3]), and right posterior thalamic radiation (intensive treatment, 49.5 mm3 [95% CI, 24.3-74.7 mm3]; standard treatment, 102.6 mm3 [95% CI, 71.0-134.2 mm3]). This study suggests that intensive BP treatment, compared with standard treatment, was associated with a slower increase of WMLs, improved diffusion tensor imaging, and FA and CBF changes in several brain regions that represent vulnerable areas that may benefit from more strict BP control. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206062.

Abstract 60: Impact of a Multisite, Protocol-Driven, Nurse Practitioner-Led, Cardiovascular Prevention Program in a Hispanic Medicare Advantage Population at High Risk for ASCVD: Healthy Heart Program at Cano Health.

Introduction: Despite availability of effective and inexpensive pharmacologic therapies for hypercholesterolemia and hypertension, many patients at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) do not achieve optimal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels. We hypothesized that risk factor control could be improved by using nurse practitioners and a guideline-directed protocol in a Medicare Advantage (MA) population. Methods: We designed and implemented an ongoing 18 site, multistate (FL, TX, NV), ASCVD risk assessment and management program (Healthy Heart) in a large national MA primary care clinic (Cano Health). The cardiometabolic risk assessment and management program was designed by a team of preventive cardiologists, with the plan of being Nurse Practitioner (NP)-led, with remote support by a cardiologist. Protocols provided details on initiation and titration of drug therapy to achieve LDL-C and SBP goals. Patients with organ transplants, advanced cancer, an ejection fraction &lt;35%, and on hemodialysis were excluded. Results: From October 2021-October 2022, 5430 patients were enrolled in the program. A total of 1858 (34.2%) had established ASCVD, 1033 (19.0%) had diabetes mellitus (DM). A total of 713 (13.1%) had both ASCVD and DM. In patients who had ASCVD and diabetes together, high intensity statin use increased from 39.4% to 68.3% after enrollment; 52.66% achieved an LDL-C &lt;70 mg/dl after enrollment compared to 31.0% at baseline. Antihypertensive medications were intensified in 408/1041 (39.2%) of ASCVD and 276/558 (49.5%) of DM patients, with a higher proportion achieving a SBP &lt;130 mm Hg after enrollment. Conclusions: Implementing a novel cardiovascular prevention program in a population of mostly Hispanic MA patients at high risk for ASCVD, using NPs, with strict adherence to a step-by-step evidence-based protocol supervised by cardiologists, is associated with reduction in LDL levels and SBP and with improvement in reaching LDL and SBP targets.

Cost-effectiveness of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control Among Older Patients With Hypertension

Older patients with hypertension receiving intensive systolic blood pressure control (110-130 mm Hg) have lower incidences of cardiovascular events than those receiving standard control (130-150 mm Hg). Nevertheless, the mortality reduction is insignificant, and intensive blood pressure management results in more medical costs from treatments and subsequent adverse events. To examine the incremental lifetime outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of intensive vs standard blood pressure control in older patients with hypertension from the health care payer's perspective. This economic analysis was conducted with a Markov model to examine the cost-effectiveness of intensive blood pressure management among patients aged 60 to 80 years with hypertension. Treatment outcome data from the Trial of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Older Patients With Hypertension (STEP trial) and different cardiovascular risk assessment models for a hypothetical cohort of STEP-eligible patients were used. Costs and utilities were obtained from published sources. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) against the willingness-to-pay threshold was used to evaluate whether the management was cost-effective. Extensive sensitivity, subgroup, and scenario analyses were performed to address uncertainty. The US and UK population using race-specific cardiovascular risk models were conducted in the generalizability analysis. Data for the STEP trial were collected from February 10 to March 10, 2022, and were analyzed for the present study from March 10 to May 15, 2022. Hypertension treatments with a systolic blood pressure target of 110 to 130 mm Hg or 130 to 150 mm Hg. Incremental lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and ICER are discounted at the given rates annually. After simulating 10 000 STEP-eligible patients assumed to be 66 years of age (4650 men [46.5%] and 5350 women [53.5%]) in the model, the ICER values were ¥51 675 ($12 362) per QALY gained in China, $25 417 per QALY gained in the US, and £4679 ($7004) per QALY gained in the UK. Simulations projected that the intensive management in China being cost-effective were 94.3% and 100% below the willingness-to-pay thresholds of 1 time (¥89 300 [$21 364]/QALY) and 3 times (¥267 900 [$64 090]/QALY) the gross domestic product per capita, respectively. The US had 86.9% and 95.6% probabilities of cost-effectiveness at $50 000/QALY and $100 000/QALY, respectively, and the UK had 99.1% and 100% of probabilities of cost-effectiveness at £20 000 ($29 940)/QALY and £30 000 ($44 910)/QALY, respectively. In this economic evaluation, the intensive systolic blood pressure control in older patients produced fewer cardiovascular events and had acceptable costs per QALY gained, well below the typical willingness-to-pay thresholds. The cost-effective advantages of intensive blood pressure management in older patients were consistent over various clinical scenarios across different countries.

Abstract WP21: Staged Implementation Of A Rapid, Intensive And Sustained Blood Pressure Protocol In Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: The potential benefit of blood pressure (BP) lowering in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients is time-dependent and is an easy and modifiable treatment applicable to different hospital scenarios. However, previous clinical trials did not establish consensus about the best BP strategy to achieve a rapid and sustained BP control. We aimed to assess the impact of learning a staged implementation of rapid-intensive-sustained BP protocol on time targets and BP control rate over the first 24 hours of ICH. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected of consecutive patients with spontaneous ICH (&lt;6h) and systolic BP (SBP) &gt;150 mmHg under a rapid (antihypertensive IV bolus by a stroke nurse at CT scan), intensive (SBP target &lt;140 mmHg within 1 hour after BP agent onset),and sustained (antihypertensive continuous infusion immediately after IV bolus) 24-hour BP protocol during a 6-year period. BP was recorded regularly according to the following schedule: every 15 minutes (0-6 hours); every 30 minutes (6h to 12h), and every 60 minutes (12h to 24h). We recorded the time from BP treatment onset to SBP target achievement and the rate of SBP sustention below target (&lt;140 mm Hg) at all time frames. The protocol implementation was divided in 6 consecutive year periods. Results: A total of 207 patients were included in the study. Compared between the periods, the frequency of SBP target achievement during the first hour was increased steadily over different periods(33.3% vs. 54.5% vs. 69.2% vs 69.4% vs 75% and 59.7%; P=0.024 ); median time to SBP target achievement tended to be lower during the evolution of protocol assessment (120 [45-240] min; 49.5 [30-101] min; 53 [29-82] min; 47 [28-74] min; 48 [27-66] min; 50 [30-85] min; P=0.054 ) and SBP sustention rate below the target improve during the acute phase at different time frames, including 2h (26.3% vs. 71.9% vs 60% vs 73.9% vs. 57,7% vs 59.5%; P= 0.012 ), 4h (57.1% vs. 63.3% vs 87.5% vs 85% vs. 61.5% vs. 69.2%; P= 0.05 ), 6h (60.9% vs. 58.6%, vs 95.5% vs 84.4% vs 58.3% vs. 75%; P=0.009 ). Conclusions: Rapid-intensive-sustained BP protocol is a good intervention to both achieve a rapid BP target and reduce time delays,and improve the rates of BP control over the acute phase of ICH patients.

Abstract TP199: Association Of Blood Pressure Parameters In Unsecured Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage And Outcomes

Background: Elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) has been linked to pre-procedural rebleeding risk and poor outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, the relationship between blood pressure parameters including mean arterial pressure (MAP) with rebleeding both prior to and during aneurysm securement remains unclear. This study seeks to determine the association between BP parameters and rebleeding events and outcomes in patients with aSAH. Design/Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of consecutive patients with aSAH admitted to an academic center between July 2016 and March 2021. All BP parameters, which were recorded on an hourly basis from admission, were reviewed. Per our institutional protocol, the SBP target is &lt;140 mmHg for all unsecured aSAH patients. Rebleeding was defined as radiographic worsening of hemorrhage prior to or immediately following aneurysm securement, as seen on imaging and determined by a radiologist. Binary regression analysis was used to determine association between maximum recorded BP parameters and outcomes including rebleeding and poor functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale 4-6 at 3 months post-discharge. Results: The cohort included 295 patients (mean age 57 years [SD 13.4], 61% female, 87% received endovascular treatments, 13% surgical clipping). Two or more consecutive SBP values &gt;140 were seen in 41% and &gt;160 in 15% of patients. Rebleeding prior or during securing aneurysms including intra-procedural bleeding occurred in 53 patients (18%). There was no association between either maximum recorded SBP (169.7 mmHg [36.2] vs. 166.9 [32.7], p=0.57) or MAP (121 mmHg [22.9] vs. 117.8 [22.9], p=0.42) and rebleeding. However, maximum recorded MAP was associated with poor outcome (OR 1.01 for 1 mmHg increase in MAP, 95% CI: 1.006-1.02, p=0.039). Conclusions: Elevated MAP peri-securement of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm can be associated with poor outcome. Multicenter prospective studies should further examine the association between MAP cut offs and outcomes to be considered in guidelines.

Association of serum uric acid with benefits of intensive blood pressure control

Introduction and objectivesIntensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control improved outcomes in the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Whether the serum uric acid concentration at baseline alters the benefits of intensive SBP control is unknown. MethodsThe STEP trial was a randomized controlled trial that compared the effects of intensive (SBP target of 110 to<130mmHg) and standard (SBP target of 130 to <150mmHg) SBP control in Chinese patients aged 60 to 80 years with hypertension. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular disease events. This post hoc analysis was performed to examine whether the effects of intensive SBP intervention differed by the baseline uric acid concentration using 2 models: restricted cubic spline curves and subgroup analyses, both based on the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model in the analysis of the primary outcome and secondary outcomes (excluding all-cause death). In the analysis of all-cause death, the Cox regression model was used. We also examined the change in the follow-up uric acid concentrations. ResultsOverall, the risk of the primary outcome rose as the cumulative uric acid concentration increased in both the intensive and standard treatment groups. Patients with intensive treatment had a lower multivariable-adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio for the primary outcome, but with a wide overlap of 95%CI. Next, we stratified patients according to their baseline uric acid concentration (tertile 1 [T1], <303.0μmol/L; tertile 2 [T2], 303.0 to <375.8μmol/L; and tertile 3 [T3], ≥375.8μmol/L). Subgroup analyses using tertiles provided HRs and 95%CI in T1 (HR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.36–0.86; P=.008), T2 (HR, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.56–1.14; P=.22) and T3 (HR, 0.86; 95%CI, 0.60–1.21; P=.39), with an interaction P value of .29. The results for most of the secondary outcomes followed the same trends. ConclusionsThere was no evidence that the benefit of the intensive SBP control differed by baseline uric acid concentrations. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (Identifier: NCT03015311).

Diastolic Blood Pressure and Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cognitive Outcomes: Insights From the SPRINT MIND Trial.

The potential benefits or harms of intensive systolic blood pressure (BP) control on cognitive function and cerebral blood flow in individuals with low diastolic blood pressure (DBP) remain unclear. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the SPRINT MIND (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Memory and Cognition in Decreased Hypertension) that randomly assigned hypertensive participants to an intensive (<120 mm Hg; n=4278) or standard (<140 mm Hg; n=4385) systolic blood pressure target. We evaluated the effects of BP intervention on cognitive outcomes and cerebral blood flow across baseline DBP quartiles. Participants in the intensive group had a lower incidence rate of probable dementia or mild cognitive impairment than those in the standard group, regardless of DBP quartiles. The hazard ratio of intensive versus standard target for probable dementia or mild cognitive impairment was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.73-1.12) in the lowest DBP quartile and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.48-1.02) in the highest DBP quartile, respectively, with an interaction P value of 0.24. Similar results were found for probable dementia (interaction P=0.06) and mild cognitive impairment (interaction P=0.80). The effect of intensive treatment on cerebral blood flow was not modified by baseline DBP either (interaction P=0.25). Even among participants within the lowest DBP quartile, intensive versus standard BP treatment resulted in an increasing trend of annualized change in cerebral blood flow (+0.26 [95% CI, -0.72 to 1.24] mL/[100 g·min]). Intensive BP control did not appear to have a detrimental effect on cognitive outcomes and cerebral perfusion in patients with low baseline DBP. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

Optimal Blood Pressure Control Target for Older Patients with Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: This study evaluated the optimal systolic blood pressure (SBP) target for older patients with hypertension. Method: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed by using a modified version of the Cochrane risk of bias. The trial outcomes comprised the following clinical events: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke. Results: A total of six trials were included. We reclassified all treatment therapies into three conditions according to the final achieved SBP after intervention (&lt;130 mmHg, 130–139 mmHg and ≥140 mmHg). Our results demonstrated that anti-hypertensive treatment with an SBP target &lt;130 mmHg, compared with treatment with an SBP target ≥140 mmHg, significantly decreased the incidence of MACE (OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.19–0.76), but no statistical difference was found in other comparisons. Although the results showed a trend toward more intensive anti-hypertension therapy having better effects on preventing cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke, no significant differences were found among groups. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggested that SBP &lt;130 mmHg might be the optimal BP control target for patients ≥60 years of age; however, further evidence is required to support our findings.

S-10-3: CAN ACHIEVED AVERAGE SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE BELOW 130 MMHG CAUSE HARM IN ELDERLY HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY?

Objectives: We previously reported increased mortality in hypertensive patients &gt; 55 yrs. (average 67 yrs., n = 9,193) with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) who achieved in-treatment systolic blood pressure (SBP) &lt; 130 mmHg during an average of 5 yrs. of treatment. Possibly hypertrophic myocardium with degenerated microcirculation becomes ischemic causing fatal complications. The present study aimed to investigate similar elderly patients with LVH in a parallel outcome trial and test the hypothesis that achieved average SBP &lt; 130 mmHg may cause harm in the elderly. Design and Methods: Of 15,245 participating hypertensive patients we identified a population without cardiovascular events during the first 18 months (n = 13,808) after enrollment with discontinuation of previous antihypertensive medications and subsequent up-titration of randomized study drugs and stabilization of SBP. Of these 2,458 patients had electrocardiographic LVH with or without strain. Patients who achieved average SBP &gt; = 140 mmHg during the coming 30 months of follow-up (main population n = 5,505, LVH n = 1,200) served as reference groups. Cox-analyses adjusted for age, gender, and a number of baseline variables were used to compare the primary cardiac composite endpoint including fatal events, stroke and congestive heart failure for patients who achieved average SBP 130–139 mmHg (main population n = 5,833, LVH n = 939) and patients who achieved average SBP &lt; 130 mmHg (main population n = 2,465, LVH n = 319). Results: The TABLE shows hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for groups with achieved average SBP 130–139 mmHg and &lt; 130 mmHg for the primary cardiac endpoint, stroke and heart failure in the main population and in LVH patients. For the main population achieved average SBP &lt; 130 mmHg prevented primary cardiac events and stroke but not heart failure. For the LVH patients achieved average SBP &lt; 140 mmHg prevented the primary event but &lt; 130 mmHg did not. However, the risks for stroke and heart failure were not significantly reduced with SBP &lt; 140 mmHg in the LVH patients and the risk of heart failure was non-significantly increased &lt; 130 mmHg. Conclusions: Achieved average SBP &lt; 130 mmHg prevents the primary cardiac endpoint and stroke but not heart failure in elderly hypertensive patients. The risk of primary cardiac events was not significantly reduced &lt; 130 mmHg in the LVH patients, and the risks for stroke and heart failure were not significantly reduced &lt; 140 mmHg. On the contrary, &lt; 130 mmHg the risk for heart failure was increased though not significantly. Target SBP thus remains highly uncertain in elderly LVH patients and needs further investigation.

S-03-1: BRAIN IMAGING FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

Small vessels in the brain is susceptible especially for the effect of hypertension. Therefore, longstanding hypertension may induce cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) which is designated as hypertensive CSVD. The patients with hypertensive CSVD may exhibit various types of lesions including lacunar infarction, white matter lesion, cerebral hemorrhage and microbleeds in brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. White matter lesions (WMLs) are one of the most representative lesions which are closely related to hypertension and aging. They are classified into periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) and deep white matter hyperintensity (DWMH), and the former is more closely involved in cognitive decline than the latter. In the SPRINT MIND trial which examined the significance of intensive blood pressure control, WML volume increased by 0.28 cm3 for 4years in the intensive treatment group whereas by 0.92 cm3 in the standard treatment group, indicating 70% suppression of WML expansion. We quantitatively assessed WML volume in patients with vascular dementia and Alzheimer disease, and as expected, both PVH DWMH were significantly larger in vascular dementia than in Alzheimer disease. The mechanisms for CMBs are not fully understood but may be secondary to blood-brain barrier damages from long-standing hypertension, or alternatively, amyloid deposition in the tissue. In our previous study, we investigated degree of SVD changes using hypertensive arteriopathy SVD (HA SVD) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy SVD (CAA SVD) scores. With the analysis of SVD scores in 53 subjects with CMBs admixed with lobar and deep distributions, mixed CMBs were mainly caused by HA. These neuroimaging markers are crucial for management of hypertension. Small subcortical stroke (SPS3) trial which enrolled patients with symptomatic lacunar infarctions, were divided into two groups: those with a systolic blood pressure target between 130 and 149 mm Hg and those with less than 130 mm Hg. There was no significant difference in the frequency of all strokes, the rate of intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly lower in the group with intensive blood pressure control. This SPS3 trial revealed that a systolic blood pressure target of less than 130 mm Hg is beneficial in reducing risk in lacunar stroke patients. Thus, we overview brain imaging markers in hypertensive patients and their significance for the management of SVD.

Factors Associated With Achievement of Blood Pressure, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and Glycemic Targets for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases Among High Cardiovascular Risk Malaysians in Primary Care.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the world's leading cause of death. About half of Malaysian adults have at least 2 risk factors; thus, rigorous primary preventions are crucial to prevent the first cardiovascular (CV) event. This study aimed to determine the achievement of treatment targets and factors associated with it among high CV risk individuals. This cross-sectional study included 390 participants from a primary care clinic in Selangor, Malaysia, between February and June 2022. The inclusion criteria were high-CV risk individuals, that is, Framingham risk score >20%, diabetes without target organ damage, stage 3 kidney disease, and very high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >4.9 mmol/L or blood pressure (BP) >180/110 mmHg. Individuals with existing CVD were excluded. The treatment targets were BP <140/90 mmHg (≤135/75 for diabetics), LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L, and HbA1c ≤6.5%. Multiple logistic regressions determined the association between sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, health literacy, and medication adherence with the achievements of each target. About 7.2% achieved all treatment targets. Of these, 35.1% reached systolic and diastolic (46.7%) BP targets. About 60.2% and 28.2% achieved optimal LDL-C and HbA1c, respectively. Working participants had lower odds of having optimal systolic (aOR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.90) and diastolic (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.17-0.96) BP. Those who adhered to treatments were more likely to achieve LDL-C and HbA1c targets; (aOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.10-2.69) and (aOR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.25-4.83), respectively. The control of risk factors among high CV risk patients in this study was suboptimal. Urgent measures such as improving medication adherence are warranted.

CENtral blood pressure Targeting: a pragmatic RAndomized triaL in advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (CENTRAL-CKD): A Clinical Research Protocol.

Emerging data favor central blood pressure (BP) over brachial cuff BP to predict cardiovascular and kidney events, as central BP more closely relates to the true aortic BP. Considering that patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high cardiovascular risk and can have unreliable brachial cuff BP measurements (due to high arterial stiffness), this population could benefit the most from hypertension management using central BP measurements. To assess the feasibility and efficacy of targeting central BP as opposed to brachial BP in patients with CKD G4-5. Pragmatic multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled pilot trial. Seven large academic advanced kidney care clinics across Canada. A total of 116 adults with CKD G4-5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min) and brachial cuff systolic BP between 120 and 160 mm Hg. The key exclusion criteria are 1) ≥ 5 BP drugs, 2) recent acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or injurious fall, 3) previous kidney replacement therapy. Double-blind randomization to a central or a brachial cuff systolic BP target (both < 130 mm Hg) as measured by a validated central BP device. The study duration is 12 months with follow-up visits every 2 to 4 months, based on local practice. All other aspects of CKD management are at the discretion of the attending nephrologist. Primary Feasibility: Feasibility of a large-scale trial based on predefined components. Primary Efficacy: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity at 12 months. Others: Efficacy (eGFR decline, albuminuria, BP drugs, and quality of life); Events (major adverse cardiovascular events, CKD progression, hospitalization, mortality); Safety (low BP events and acute kidney injury). May be challenging to distinguish whether central BP is truly different from brachial BP to the point of significantly influencing treatment decisions. Therapeutic inertia may be a barrier to successfully completing a randomized trial in a population of CKD G4-5. These 2 aspects will be evaluated in the feasibility assessment of the trial. This is the first trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of using central BP to manage hypertension in advanced CKD, paving the way to a future large-scale trial. clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05163158).