Systemic Treatment For Advanced Disease Research Articles

Time toxicity of lutetium-177 treatment in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Objectives: We aim to investigate the time toxicity of patients with gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumours treated with lutetium-177 Dotatate in a single institution. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Methods: All patients with gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumours treated with lutetium-177 Dotatate in the Alexander Fleming Institute were included. Our primary endpoint was to evaluate time toxicity, which accounted for every day that the patient had contact with any department of any healthcare institution. Results: Our cohort included 21 patients with metastatic disease, female sex 86%, and had a median age of 55 (IQR 44-63). The primary tumour site was small intestine in 47.6% of the cases. The median number of previous systemic treatments for advanced disease was 2 (IQR 2 - 3). The overall response rate was 19%, and 66.6% had disease clinical benefit. The median calculated 'time toxicity' was 11 days (IQR 8-18), representing 5.7% of the total treatment duration. The main contributors to time-toxicity included infusion days, blood draws, radiological scans, and hospitalizations (median 4 days for each). Conclusion: Lutetium-177 Dotatate treatment for gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumours was associated with a low time toxicity, excellent tolerability, good response and a prolonged PFS, of which the median was not reached in the short follow-up we present. Newer treatments with different mechanisms of action provide longer survivals and widen the landscape of choices. Understanding new clinical endpoints is important for the transition into a more modern clinical practice, strengthening personalised and patient-oriented strategies.

Tracheal Tumors: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Palliative Treatment and Follow-Up.

A substantial portion of patients with advanced cancer cannot be cured, regardless of the therapeutic methods employed. Hence, rational palliative causal treatment becomes crucial. Representative studies specifically addressing the exclusive palliative treatment of patients diagnosed with tracheal cancers have not been identified. In most studies, patients treated palliatively constituted a subset of the overall evaluated group. A thorough literature review was conducted, focusing on three types of palliative treatment: palliative radiotherapy, palliative surgical procedures, and systemic treatment for advanced disease. This review uniquely fills a significant gap in the existing literature by providing the first comprehensive and updated clinical practice guidelines specifically focused on the palliative treatment of tracheal tumors. The proposed guidelines emphasize the unique clinical challenges and treatment strategies pertinent to palliative care in tracheal tumors, which are not adequately covered in existing guidelines for other thoracic malignancies.

Efficacy of first-line chemotherapy based on primary site of tumor versus etoposide-platinum in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs) constitute a rare and aggressive group of malignancies usually with widespread disease. There are limited studies on GEP-NECs, and therefore, we aim to acquire more information on the clinical features, treatment regimens, and prognosis. Data from advanced GEP-NECs patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2010 to 2022 were retrospectively collected. Relationships between clinical-pathological features, treatment regimens, and prognosis were investigated using Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression models. A total of fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 65.5 years and 79.6% were male. At diagnosis, 51.9% and 3.7% of patients developed liver and brain metastasis respectively. Sixteen (29.6%) patients received chemotherapy according to primary site of tumor (PST), while thirty-eight (70.4%) were treated with etoposide-platinum (EP) regimen, which based on the first-line treatment of advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). No significant differences on progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate were observed between these two groups. Univariate survival analysis showed that liver metastasis, elevated baseline serum carcinoembryonic antigen, elevated baseline serum neuron-specific enolase, elevated baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase, and elevated baseline serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with shorter PFS. After multivariate analysis, elevated NLR was the only factor that remained significantly associated with shorter PFS (P=0.01). GEP-NECs are aggressive neoplasms, of which elevated NLR is proven to be an independent negative predictor. Treatment regimens based on PST are not inferior to regiments based on SCLC (EP) for GEP-NECs patients. Large-scale, prospective randomized controlled trials are required to establish the standard of care.

Liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and S-1 as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NASOX): A multicenter phase I/IIa study

IntroductionThis multicenter phase I/IIa study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), oxaliplatin, and S-1 (NASOX) as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. MethodsPatients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior systemic treatment for advanced disease, aged ≥ 19 years, with measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 were eligible. The primary endpoints were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the phase I cohort and overall response rate (ORR) in the phase IIa cohort. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included patients who received the RP2D. ResultsIn phase I, seven patients were screened, and six were assessed for DLT. None experienced DLT during the first cycle. The RP2D was determined as nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–7 every 14 days. For the ITT (N = 41; 7, and 34 from phases I and IIa, respectively), the most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (31.7 %), enterocolitis (9.8 %), anorexia (7.3 %), and diarrhea (2.4 %). The ORR was 58.5 % (1 complete, and 23 partial responses). Two underwent conversion surgery; both achieved R0 resection. With median follow-up of 17.5 months, median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 5.0–8.1) and median overall survival was 11.4 months (95 % CI, 9.8–15.5). ConclusionNASOX exhibited a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy outcomes consistent with NALIRIFOX, showing potential to replace infusional 5-fluorouracil with oral S-1 in the triplet regimen.

QUIC: Phase 2 study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, quemliclustat (AB680), and zimberelimab (AB122) during first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC)—Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium study BTCRC-GI22-564.

TPS4195 Background: Despite recent approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy in the first-line setting, the median overall survival (mOS) for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains less than 15 months. CD73 is a key enzyme responsible for the conversion of extracellular adenosine 5’-monophosphate into adenosine and may play an important role in creating an immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment. High expression of CD73 in BTC is associated with decreased OS. Quemliclustat (Q) is a potent, selective, reversible inhibitor of CD73. Q in combination with chemotherapy has demonstrated promising activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer without significant increase in adverse events. The BTCRC-GI22-564 study evaluates safety and preliminary efficacy of Q in combination with zimberelimab (Z), a monoclonal antibody targeting human PD-1, with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) as first-line therapy for patients with advanced BTC, QUIC (Q and Immunotherapy in Cholangiocarcinoma). Methods: This is an open label, single arm, phase II multi-site trial, evaluating Q and Z in combination with GC in patients with advanced BTC who have not received systemic treatment for advanced disease or who completed adjuvant therapy > 6 months prior to development of recurrent disease. Chemotherapy is given on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 of each 42-day cycle as per local standards. Z is administered at a fixed dose of 360 mg via IV infusion every 3 weeks. Q is administered via IV infusion on days 1, 15, and 29. A safety run-in portion built into the study is planned to enroll 6 subjects to ensure there are no dose limiting toxicities (DLT). If a study defined DLT is observed, Q, gemcitabine and cisplatin will be reduced by 1 dose level, and an additional 6 subjects will be enrolled in the safety run-in portion. The primary efficacy endpoint is median progression free survival (mPFS) with null and alternative survival of 6.0 and 10.0 months, respectively. Based on an accrual rate of 3 patients per month, we expect to accrue 33-39 patients which will provide at least 83% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.1. Secondary endpoints include mOS, disease control rate, overall response rate, and duration of response. Correlative endpoints will assess clinical outcomes with immune infiltration within tumor microenvironment, CD73 and PD-L1 expression. The QUIC study is currently open to enrollment through BTCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT06048133 .

Global, randomized, phase III study of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-306 update): Minimum 3-year survival follow-up.

4032 Background: RATIONALE-306 (NCT03783442) is the first global study to investigate anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy in combination with different chemotherapy (chemo) options in the first-line (1L) treatment of advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). At interim analysis (IA), tislelizumab (TIS) plus chemo demonstrated a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) versus placebo (PBO) plus chemo, with a manageable safety profile. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data with minimum 3 years’ follow-up after study unblinding at IA. Methods: Adults with unresectable locally advanced recurrent/metastatic ESCC and no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were enrolled and randomized (1:1; stratified by region, prior definitive therapy, and investigator [INV]-chosen chemo) to receive TIS 200 mg (Arm A) or PBO (Arm B) IV every 3 weeks plus chemo (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine or platinum plus paclitaxel), until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR), all per INV, and safety. Results: In total, 649 patients (pts) were randomized (Arm A, n=326; Arm B, n=323). At a minimum study follow-up of 36.0 months, improvements in OS, PFS, and DoR in Arm A versus B (Table) were maintained relative to the IA. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS with TIS plus chemo versus PBO plus chemo was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.59, 0.83). Similar to the IA, incidences of any-grade (96.6% vs 96.3%) or grade ≥3 (67.0% vs 64.5%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were comparable between Arms A and B, respectively; treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were higher in Arm A (32.1%) versus B (22.1%). In Arm A versus B, respectively, serious TRAEs occurred in 29.9% vs 19.6% of pts; TRAEs leading to death occurred in 1.9% and 1.2%. Conclusions: After minimum 3 years’ follow-up, 1L TIS plus chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS and durable antitumor response benefit versus PBO plus chemo in pts with advanced/metastatic ESCC, with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT03783442 . [Table: see text]

Is Older Age an Independent Prognostic Factor of Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer?

Plain Language SummaryOlder patients with advanced CRC constitute a heterogeneous population, including patients with excellent health status and others with multiple comorbidities, functional dependence, or limited life expectancy. Furthermore, the definition of an “elderly” or “older” patient is not widely accepted and may vary between studies, although 75 years may be an appropriate cut-off point, as confirmed in our study. At present, there are few prospective and randomized studies focused on the progression and treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in elderly patients, so understanding the factors that influence its clinical course is a difficult challenge. In this retrospective real-world study, we analyze the influence of advanced age on the survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The analysis of eighteen characteristics that were grouped in three subcategories: characteristic related to the patient (age, sex, comorbidities, polypharmacy, ECOG, and nutritional status [albumin levels at diagnosis]), to the tumor (stage at diagnosis, tumor side, molecular profile, tumor burden [CEA levels at diagnosis], location and number of metastasis), and to the treatment administrated (systemic treatment for advanced disease, chemotherapy schedule and number of lines, severe adverse events and dose reductions, and surgery of liver metastasis) showed that older age at diagnosis is not an independent prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, tumor burden, nutritional status, systemic treatment of advanced disease, or surgery of liver metastases are independent predictors of survival.

Abstract CT076: Randomized, global, phase 3 study of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-306): China subgroup analysis

Abstract Background: Tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, + chemotherapy (chemo) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) vs placebo + chemo, with a manageable safety profile, as a first line (1L) treatment for patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) at interim analysis of the phase 3 RATIONALE-306 study. We report data from the China subgroup analysis. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, global study, adults with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic ESCC, with no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were enrolled regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status. Pts were randomized (1:1); stratified by region, prior definitive therapy, and investigator-chosen chemo (platinum + fluoropyrimidine or platinum + paclitaxel). Pts received tislelizumab (T) 200 mg intravenously + chemo (C) (Arm T+C) or placebo (P) + chemo (Arm P+C) once every three weeks; treatment continued until disease progression by investigator per RECIST v1.1, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1, objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR), in addition to safety. Results: Of 649 pts in the overall population, 370 (57.0%) were enrolled from China. At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2022), the median study follow-up in the China subgroup (ITT population) was 15.8 months (mo) in Arm T+C (n=182) and 10.6 mo in Arm P+C (n=188). Longer OS (median OS 16.6 mo vs 11.2 mo; unstratified hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54, 0.89) and PFS (median PFS 8.3 mo vs 5.6 mo; unstratified HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45, 0.75) indicate survival benefit in Arm T+C vs P+C, respectively. Arm T+C had higher response rates and more durable responses than Arm P+C; ORR was 64.8% vs 44.1% (odds ratio 2.33 [95% CI 1.53, 3.55]) respectively, and median DoR was 7.4 mo (95% CI 5.6, 9.5) vs 5.7 mo (95% CI 4.3, 7.5), respectively. Similar proportions of pts in Arm T+C vs P+C had ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE; 98.8% vs 98.9%) and ≥grade 3 TRAEs (72.9% vs 73.4%). Serious TRAEs occurred in 27.6% vs 21.2% of pts in Arm T+C vs P+C, and TRAEs leading to death occurred in 2.9% vs 1.6% of pts, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 28.2% vs 17.4%, in Arm T+C vs P+C. Conclusions: In the China subgroup, 1L tislelizumab + chemo demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS, ORR, and DoR vs placebo + chemo in pts with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with a manageable safety profile, consistent with published results in the overall population. Acknowledgments: This study was sponsored by BeiGene, Ltd. Medical writing support, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Emma Ashman, BSc, of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by BeiGene, Ltd. Citation Format: Yongqian Shu, Yueyin Pan, Ping Lu, Yi Jiang, Jingdong Zhang, Xiaohong Wu, Yuanhu Yao, Lin Shen, Yi Ba, Zhiyong He, Yuxian Bai, Jianhua Chen, Guohua Yu, Yanyan Peng, Hongqian Wu, Lei Wang, Liyun Li, Jianming Xu. Randomized, global, phase 3 study of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-306): China subgroup analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT076.

Abstract P4-01-28: PALBOSPAIN: OBSERVATIONAL ANALYSIS OF FIRST-LINE THERAPY WITH PALBOCICLIB IN PATIENTS WITH HR+/HER2- METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC) IN REAL-LIFE CONDITIONS

Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Palbociclib associated with hormone therapy (HT) has shown significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate versus HT alone in patients with HR+, HER2- MBC. The PALBOSPAIN study evaluates the efficacy and safety of palbociclib treatment under real-life conditions. The main objective of the study was to assess PFS, and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), response rate, time to next line of treatment, percentage of dose reduction and safety. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is an observational, ambispective, multicenter, nation-wide study. Patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- MBC who had started first-line treatment with palbociclib between November 2017 and November 2019 were included. Patients treated within a clinical trial were excluded, as were those who had received any previous systemic treatment for advanced disease. RESULTS 762 patients from 35 centers were included. 79% (n=600) were postmenopausal, 54.9% (n=418) had visceral disease, and 30.6% (n=233) had de-novo metastatic disease. Palbocliclib was combined with an aromatase inhibitor in 69.6% of patients and fulvestrant in 30.2% Four groups were established to assess efficacy (table 1): overall population; patients with de-novo metastatic disease (cohort A); patients relapsing >12 months after the end of adjuvant hormonal therapy (cohort B); and patients relapsing within 12 months after the end of adjuvant hormonal therapy (cohort C). Median PFS was 24 months (CI 95%; 25-27) overall and 28 (IC 95%; 23-39), 29 (IC 95%;25-35) and 14 months (IC 95%;11-17) for cohorts a, B and C, respectively. Median overall survival was 42 months (40-NA). The most common side effects were neutropenia (71.3%, grade 3-4 in 52.5%, no episodes of febrile neutropenia), fatigue (38.6%), leucopenia (29.8%), anemia (28.9%), articular pain (19%), and thrombocytopenia (2,2%). 49% (n=385) of patients required dose reduction of palbociclib (one level in 27.6% and two levels in 21.4%). CONCLUSION In the first two years after its approval in Spain, palbociclib in first line of HR+/HER2- MBC in real-life conditions yielded PFS and safety results comparable to those of PALOMA 2 and PALOMA 3 clinical trials. OS results were poorer, although the population included in this retrospective study is heterogeneous and median survival values have not been reached in some subgroups. Table 1. Efficay results of palbociclib in real world Citation Format: Noelia Martínez-Jáñez, Meritxell Bellet Ezquerra, Fernando Henao, Luis Manso, Antonio Antón, Pilar Zamora, Serafin Morales Murillo, Pablo Tolosa, Raquel Andrés, Lourdes Calvo, Elena Galve, Rafael Lopez, Francisco Ayala de la Peña, Sara López-Tarruella, Laia Boronat, Tamara Martos, J. Ignacio Chacón, Isabel Álvarez, Juan de la Haba-Rodríguez, Fernando Moreno Antón. PALBOSPAIN: OBSERVATIONAL ANALYSIS OF FIRST-LINE THERAPY WITH PALBOCICLIB IN PATIENTS WITH HR+/HER2- METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC) IN REAL-LIFE CONDITIONS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-28.

Randomized, global, phase 3 study of tislelizumab (TIS) + chemotherapy (chemo) versus placebo (PBO) + chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (RATIONALE-306): Non-Asia subgroup.

340 Background: TIS, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, + chemo as 1L therapy demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) vs PBO + chemo in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54, 0.80]; P< 0.0001), with a manageable safety profile, at interim analysis of the phase 3, double-blind RATIONALE-306 study (NCT03783442). Here, we report data from the non-Asia subgroup (Europe, Northern America, and Oceania). Methods: Adults with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were randomized 1:1, (stratified by region, prior definitive therapy, and investigator [INV]-chosen chemo) to receive TIS 200 mg intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks (Q3W) (Arm A) or PBO IV Q3W (Arm B), with platinum + fluoropyrimidine, or platinum + paclitaxel until disease progression by INV per RECIST v1.1, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included: progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR) by INV per RECIST v1.1; OS in the programmed death-ligand 1 score ≥10%; and safety. Results: Of 649 randomized patients, 163 (25.1%) were from the non-Asia subgroup (Arm A, n = 83; Arm B, n = 80). At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2022), the median study follow-up time in the non-Asia subgroup was 16.0 months (mo) in Arm A vs 8.4 mo in Arm B. OS (median 16.3 vs 9.0 mo; unstratified HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45, 0.96]) and PFS (median 7.7 vs 5.5 mo; unstratified HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.41, 0.83]) were improved in Arm A vs Arm B, respectively. Arm A had higher ORR (61.4% vs 41.3%, odds ratio 2.27 [95% CI 1.21, 4.25]) and longer median DoR (7.1 mo [95% CI 5.6, 9.6] vs 5.7 mo [95% CI 3.8, 8.3]) than Arm B. More patients in Arm A vs Arm B experienced ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE; 94.0% vs 88.5%), serious TRAEs (25.3% vs 17.9%), and discontinuation due to treatment-emergent AEs (42.2% vs 35.9%, respectively). Similar proportions of patients in Arm A vs Arm B had ≥grade 3 TRAEs (56.6% vs 52.6%), and TRAEs leading to death (1.2% vs 1.3%), respectively. Conclusions: In the non-Asia subgroup, 1L TIS + chemo showed a clinically meaningful improvement in OS vs PBO + chemo in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with a manageable safety profile, consistent with published results in the overall population. Clinical trial information: NCT03783442 .

Pan-viral serology defines hepatocellular carcinoma's response to immunotherapy

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading cause of liver cancer and survival remains low due to poor treatment response. Surgery is the current first-line therapy for eligible candidates; however, patients relapse despite curative resection or require systemic treatment for advanced disease. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy has recently shown promise in the treatment of cancers, including HCC; yet, we do not know which patients may benefit. Additionally, the effect of viral infection on host long-term health and how the immune footprint left by viruses may impact immunotherapy response have not been explored. We hypothesized that viral infection alters host immunity in subtle ways, leaving a persistent footprint on the immune system, which may contribute to patient response to ICI.

Use of multikinase inhibitors/lenvatinib in patients with synchronous/metachronous cancers coinciding with radioactive-resistant differentiated thyroid cancer.

This review focuses on patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) associated with multiple primary malignant neoplasm (MPMN) treated by multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) as systemic treatment for advanced disease. Despite the increasing frequency of MPMNs (many at an advanced stage) and the usefulness of MKIs for multiple metastatic cancers, published data on the management of MPMN and MKI therapies in this scenario are scarce. There are infrequent descriptions of patients with advanced MPMN treated with MKIs, but only a few have described advanced DTC. The management of MPMNs, including DTC and its particular circumstances, is reviewed, focusing on the evidence for MKI therapies. Some considerations for MPMN patients with advanced DTC are discussed, with the intention of helping physicians make decisions in these challenging situations and improving treatment and patient outcomes.

Palbociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in Asian postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer: Primary results from PALOMA-4

BackgroundThe cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib has demonstrated efficacy and a manageable safety profile in combination with endocrine therapy in women with oestrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in international phase 3 trials. The phase 3 PALOMA-4 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in Asian women with ER+/HER2– ABC. MethodsPostmenopausal women (n = 340) with no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were randomised 1:1 to palbociclib (125 mg/d orally; 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/d orally; continuously) or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end-point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points included tumour response and safety. ResultsMedian (95% CI) PFS was 21.5 (16.6–24.9) months with palbociclib plus letrozole and 13.9 (13.7–16.6) months with placebo plus letrozole (hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53–0.87]; P = 0.0012). Consistent with the established safety profile, the most common adverse events (AEs) with palbociclib plus letrozole were neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopaenia, and anaemia. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in 84.5% of patients in the palbociclib arm versus 1.2% in the placebo arm. One serious AE of febrile neutropenia in the palbociclib group was reported. ConclusionsFindings from PALOMA-4 support the efficacy and safety of first-line palbociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal Asian women with ER+/HER2– ABC. No new safety concerns of palbociclib plus letrozole were identified. Trial registrationClinicaltrials. gov, NCT02297438.

MET kinase mutations in lung cancer patients.

e21014 Background: Although mutations in the kinase domain of MET are well described in papillary renal cell carcinoma, they are rare and poorly studied in lung cancer, but could constitute a new therapeutic target given the availability of potent MET inhibitors. The characteristics of patients with MET kinase mutation in lung cancer are still unknown. Our objective was to describe the demographic, clinical and biological characteristics of these patients, and analyze their survival. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including patients with lung cancer harboring a MET kinase mutation. Patients who had already received treatment with a MET TKI before the MET kinase mutation was found were excluded. Results: We identified 37 patients with a MET kinase mutation. Among them, 2 had already received a MET inhibitor and in 8 cases, the data were not accessible. A total of 27 patients were included in the final analysis, including 17 males (63%) and only 2 (8%) never smokers. The median age was 64 (range 43-86). Most patients had adenocarcinoma (n = 25, 93%). 19 patients were diagnosed at an advanced stage. The main metastatic sites were brain (n = 8, 42%), bones (n = 7, 37%) and lungs (n = 5, 19%). PDL1 expression level was available for 21 patients, and was < 1%, 1-49% and ≥50% in 4 (19%), 5 (24%) and 12 (57%) patients respectively. MET kinase mutations involved exon 15, 16, 17, 18 or 19 in 6 (22%), 7 (26%), 7 (26%), 3 (11%) and 4 (15%) patients respectively. The 2 most common mutations were H1112Y (4 patients) and H1097R (3 patients). 18 patients (67%) had a concurrent alteration by NGS including TP53 mutations (n = 11, 41%), KRAS mutations (n = 6, 22%) and NRAS mutations (n = 3, 11%). Overall, co-alterations involving known driver oncogenes were detected in 13 patients (48%). 19 patients received a first-line systemic treatment for advanced disease. Median progression-free survival with chemotherapy and immunotherapy was 10.5 and 6.4 months, respectively (p = 0.55). Median overall survival was 12.2 months. No patient received a MET inhibitor. Conclusions: MET kinase mutations are not associated with specific clinical characteristics and frequently occur together with other oncogene mutations. These results suggest that these mutations may not be sufficient to drive carcinogenesis by themselves.

Targeted Therapies for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Simple SummaryPerihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a type of biliary tract cancer with a poor prognosis. There is growing interest in treatments targeting specific molecular changes within these cancers, and a broad range of these treatments (targeted therapies) is currently in development. This article reviews knowledge of the molecular changes within cholangiocarcinoma, which often group together to form so-called molecular subtypes, and reviews the targeted therapies used to exploit these molecular changes to improve outcomes for patients. Biliary tract cancer subtypes differ in their patterns of molecular alterations; therefore, targeted therapies are not equally applicable to all subtypes. This article examines the relevance of targeted therapies within biliary tract cancer to patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is the anatomical sub-group of biliary tract cancer (BTC) arising between the second-order intrahepatic bile ducts and the cystic duct. Together with distal and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA and iCCA; originating distal to, and proximal to this, respectively), gallbladder cancer (GBC) and ampulla of Vater carcinoma (AVC), these clinicopathologically and molecularly distinct entities comprise biliary tract cancer (BTC). Most pCCAs are unresectable at diagnosis, and for those with resectable disease, surgery is extensive, and recurrence is common. Therefore, the majority of patients with pCCA will require systemic treatment for advanced disease. The prognosis with cytotoxic chemotherapy remains poor, driving interest in therapies targeted to the molecular nature of a given patient’s cancer. In recent years, the search for efficacious targeted therapies has been fuelled both by whole-genome and epigenomic studies, looking to uncover the molecular landscape of CCA, and by specifically testing for aberrations where established therapies exist in other indications. This review aims to provide a focus on the current molecular characterisation of pCCA, targeted therapies applicable to pCCA, and future directions in applying personalised medicine to this difficult-to-treat malignancy.

Abstract OT2-11-06: SERENA-4: A Phase III comparison of AZD9833 (camizestrant) plus palbociclib, versus anastrozole plus palbociclib, for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease

Abstract Background: More than two thirds of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) have estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) tumors. In most countries, current standard-of-care first-line treatments include an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant, a selective ER degrader, combined with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Concurrent use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists is recommended for men and premenopausal women with ABC. Nevertheless, almost all ABCs eventually become resistant to endocrine therapy and the disease is incurable in these cases. New therapies are needed to combat endocrine therapy resistance, maintain patient health-related quality-of-life, and delay the need for chemotherapy. AZD9833 (camizestrant) is a highly potent, next-generation selective ER degrader and pure ER antagonist that has demonstrated anticancer properties across a range of preclinical models, including those with ER-activating mutations (Scott et al, AACR 2020). A Phase I dose-escalation and expansion study (SERENA-1) has demonstrated that AZD9833 is well tolerated and has a promising antitumor activity when administered alone or in combination with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (Baird et al, SABCS 2020). SERENA-4 (NCT04711252) is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, Phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AZD9833 in combination with palbociclib for patients with ER+/HER2− ABC who have not received systemic treatment in the advanced disease setting. Methods: SERENA-4 will enroll 1342 patients with de novo or recurrent ER+/HER2− ABC who have not previously received systemic treatment for their locoregionally recurrent or metastatic disease. Patients with recurrent disease must have received adjuvant aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen therapy for at least 24 months without relapse. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive oral treatment with either (a) AZD9833 75 mg once daily, palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off treatment and a placebo for anastrozole 1 mg once daily or (b) anastrozole 1 mg once daily, palbociclib (same as active arm) and a placebo for AZD9833 75 mg once daily. Men and premenopausal women will also receive a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS; up to 5 years). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (up to 8 years), second PFS, time to chemotherapy, objective response rate, and changes in health-related quality-of-life measures. Enrollment began in January 2021. As of 02 July 2021, the number of open sites is 57 across 15 countries. Acknowledgments: We thank Julia Mawer, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK, for providing medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca Funding: The SERENA-4 trial is funded and overseen by AstraZeneca. © 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting. All rights reserved. Citation Format: Fabrice André, Seock-Ah Im, Patrick Neven, Richard D Baird, Johannes Ettl, Matthew P Goetz, Erika Hamilton, Hiroji Iwata, Zefei Jiang, Anil Abraham Joy, Vincent Haddad, Andrew Walding, Manuel Selvi Miralles, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Antonio Llombart-Cussac. SERENA-4: A Phase III comparison of AZD9833 (camizestrant) plus palbociclib, versus anastrozole plus palbociclib, for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-11-06.

Diagnostic characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes for patients with advanced/metastatic medullary thyroid cancer

BackgroundMedullary thyroid cancer (MTC) accounts for approximately 1.6% of new cases of thyroid cancer. The objective of this study was to describe patient characteristics, biomarker testing, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes among patients with advanced/metastatic MTC in a real-world setting in the United States and to identify potential gaps in the care of these patients.MethodsSelected oncologists retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients aged ≥ 12 years diagnosed with advanced MTC. Patients must have initiated ≥ 1 line of systemic treatment for advanced/metastatic MTC between January 2013–December 2018 to be eligible. Patient characteristics, biomarker testing, and treatment patterns were summarized descriptively; progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsThe 203 patients included in this study had a mean (SD) age of 52.2 (10.4) years; mean (SD) duration of follow-up from start of first-line treatment was 24.5 (16.0) months. Most patients (82.8%) were initially diagnosed with stage IVA, IVB, or IVC disease. Among all patients, 121 (59.6%) had testing for RET mutations, of whom 37.2% had RET-mutant MTC. The RET-mutation type was reported for 28 patients; the most common mutations reported were M918T (64.3%) and C634R (32.1%). Of the 203 patients, 75.9% received only one line of systemic treatment for advanced disease, and 36% were still undergoing first-line therapy at the time of data extraction. Cabozantinib (30.0%), vandetanib (30.0%), sorafenib (17.2%), and lenvatinib (4.9%) were the most common first-line treatments. Among 49 patients who received second-line treatment, most received cabozantinib (22.4%), vandetanib (20.4%), lenvatinib (12.2%), or sunitinib (12.2%). Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) from start of first- and second-line treatments was 26.6 months (20.8–60.8) and 15.3 months (6.6-not estimable [NE]), respectively. Median OS from initiation of first- and second-line treatment was 63.8 months (46.3-NE) and 22.4 months (12.4-NE), respectively.ConclusionsFor the treatment of advanced/metastatic MTC, no specific preference of sequencing systemic agents was observed in the first- and second-line settings. Considering the recent approval of selective RET inhibitors for patients with RET-mutant MTC, future research should investigate how treatment patterns evolve for these patients.

Abstract PO-054: A phase II trial of the super-enhancer inhibitor Minnelide in advanced refractory adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP)

Abstract Background: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) is a very rare and highly aggressive variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), accounting for 0.5-4% of all pancreatic cancer cases in the US. Current data indicates that epigenetic changes and Myc overexpression lead to squamous transdifferentiation of pancreatic tumor cells and development of ASCP. Minnelide is an oral anti-super-enhancer drug that inhibits Myc expression in preclinical models of ASCP. Oral Minnelide has been previously tested in the clinic where a Phase I study determined a recommended phase 2 dose of 2 mg/day. Major toxicities included neutropenia and sepsis. We hypothesize that Minnelide will be safe and effective in patients with advanced ASCP. Methods: This Phase II open label, single arm study being conducted at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, MD (NCT04896073) will enroll up to 25 evaluable participants with advanced ASCP that has been previously treated. Eligibility criteria include: histologically confirmed ASCP (≥30% malignant squamous component), presence of metastatic, recurrent, or locally advanced unresectable disease, and progression or intolerance ≥1 prior systemic treatment for advanced disease. All participants will self-administer Minnelide at 2mg PO daily on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, for up to 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Restaging scans will be performed every 8 weeks. Optional biopsies will be requested at baseline, mid-cycle 1 and at time of progression. The primary objective is to determine the antitumor activity of Minnelide by evaluating the disease control rate. Secondary objectives are determination of drug safety in this patient population, progression free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory objectives include assessment of Minnelide effect on tumor cell epigenetics, Myc expression and immune cell populations using on-treatment tumor biopsy tissues. Changes in circulating tumor DNA and circulating immune cell populations upon treatment will also be evaluated. A Simon optimal two-stage phase II trial design will be used. If 3 of the first 12 patients experience disease control, then enrollment will continue up to 25 evaluable participants. If ≥8 of 25 participants experience disease control this would rule out an unacceptably low clinical benefit of 20% in favor of 40% (α = 0.1, β = 0.2). This trial opened for accrual in July 2021. Citation Format: Nebojsa Skorupan, Mehwish I. Ahmad, Seth M. Steinberg, Jane B. Trepel, Derek Cridebring, Haiyong Han, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Christine Alewine. A phase II trial of the super-enhancer inhibitor Minnelide in advanced refractory adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2021 Sep 29-30. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(22 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-054.

SERENA-4: A phase 3 comparison of AZD9833 (camizestrant) plus palbociclib, versus anastrozole plus palbociclib, for patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease.

TPS1101 Background: More than two thirds of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) have estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) tumors. Current standard-of-care first-line treatments include an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant, a selective ER degrader (SERD), combined with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Concurrent use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists is recommended for men and premenopausal women with ABC. Nevertheless, almost all ABCs eventually become resistant to endocrine therapy (ET) and the disease is incurable. New therapies are needed to combat ET resistance, maintain patient quality of life (QoL), and delay the need for chemotherapy. AZD9833 (camizestrant) is an orally bioavailable, highly potent, next-generation SERD that demonstrated anti-cancer properties across a range of preclinical models, including those with ER-activating mutations (Scott et al, 2020). A phase I study (SERENA-1) has demonstrated that AZD9833 is well tolerated and has a promising antitumor profile when administered alone or in combination with palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor (Baird et al, SABCS 2020). SERENA-4 (NCT04711252) is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AZD9833 in combination with palbociclib for patients with ER+ HER2− ABC who have not received any systemic treatment in the advanced disease setting. Methods: SERENA-4 will enroll 1,342 patients with de novo or recurrent ER+ HER2– ABC who have not previously received systemic treatment for their locoregionally recurrent or metastatic disease. Patients with recurrent disease must have received adjuvant AI or tamoxifen therapy for at least 24 months without relapse. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive orally either (a) AZD9833 (75 mg, once daily), palbociclib (125 mg, once daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off treatment) and anastrozole-matching placebo (once daily) or (b) anastrozole (1 mg, once daily), palbociclib (same as active arm), and AZD9833-matching placebo (once daily). Premenopausal women and men will also receive LHRH agonists. The primary endpoint will be progression-free survival (PFS; up to 5 years). Secondary endpoints will include overall survival (up to 8 years), length of second PFS period, objective response, time to chemotherapy, and changes in QoL measures. Enrollment began in January 2021. Acknowledgments: We thank Rose Goodchild, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis, UK, for providing medical writing assistance. Funding: The SERENA-4 trial is funded and overseen by AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT04711252 .

FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the First-line Treatment of Patients with MSI-H/dMMR Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma.

The FDA approved pembrolizumab on June 29, 2020, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer with no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease. The approval was based on data from Study Keynote-177, which randomly allocated patients to receive either pembrolizumab or standard of care (SOC) with chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and independently assessed progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary endpoints. At the time of the final PFS analysis and second prespecified interim OS analysis, the estimated median PFS was 16.5 months (95% CI: 5.4-32.4) versus 8.2 months (95% CI: 6.1-10.2) in the pembrolizumab and SOC arms, respectively [HR: 0.60 (95% CI: 0.45-0.80); two-sided P = 0.0004]. FDA assessed unblinded OS data during the review of the application and identified no safety concerns that would preclude approval of this supplement. Adverse reactions occurring in >30% of patients receiving pembrolizumab were diarrhea, fatigue/asthenia, and nausea. Adverse reactions occurring in >30% of patients receiving SOC were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue/asthenia, neutropenia, decreased appetite, peripheral neuropathy (high-level term), vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, and stomatitis. Duration of treatment in the pembrolizumab arm was almost double (median 11.1 months, range 0-30.6 months) than the duration of treatment in patients receiving SOC (median, 5.7 months). Approval of pembrolizumab is likely to change the treatment paradigm for first-line treatment with MSI-H advanced colorectal cancer given the study results and different safety profile.