System-level Factors Research Articles

Contributions of Multilevel Family Factors to Emotional and Behavioral Problems among Children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder in China.

Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is one of the most prevalent childhood mental health disorders and is extremely affected by family factors. However, limited studies have addressed the issue from the perspective of family systems. The current study examines the associations between multilevel family factors (i.e., family cohesion/ adaptability at system level, mother-child and father-child attachment at a dyadic level, and child self-esteem at an individual level) and emotional and behavioral problems among children with ODD in China. The participants were 256 Chinese children with ODD and their parents and class master teachers. A multiple-informant approach and structural equation model were used. The results revealed that system level factors (family cohesion/adaptability) were associated with child emotional and behavior problems indirectly through factors at the dyadic level (mother-child attachment) and the individual level (child self-esteem) in sequence. Mother-child, but not father-child, attachment, mediated the linkage between family cohesion/adaptability and the emotional problems of children with ODD. Moreover, child self-esteem mediated the association between mother-child attachment and child emotional and behavioral problems. The findings of the present study underscored that multilevel family factors are uniquely related to emotional and behavioral problems in children with ODD.

The engaged community action for preventing suicide (ECAPS) model in Latin America: development of the ¡PEDIR! program.

It is estimated that someone dies by suicide every 40s globally and that 3000 people end their lives daily. Of these deaths, 79% occur in low-resource settings. The very nature of the low-resource settings often serves as a barrier to the adoption and implementation of evidence-based suicide prevention models that have demonstrated success in high-resource countries. As such rates of suicide continue to increase, the workforce of trained mental health providers equipped to effectively engage, assess, and treat individuals struggling with suicidal thoughts and behaviors remains relatively stagnant. This paper aims to illustrate the implementation of the Engaged Community Action for Preventing Suicide (ECAPS) model as a means of developing a culturally relevant and responsive model of suicide prevention that is acceptable and sustainable in low-resource settings. University faculty and staff (n=34) and psychology students (n=25), and community-based mental health providers (n=41) providing mental health services to at-risk individuals in highly vulnerable communities in Lima, Peru participated in the implementation of ECAPS process. The resulting program, ¡PEDIR!, demonstrates the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of the ECAPS model. The ECAPS model is a feasible and effective framework for use in low-resource settings to guide the development of a culturally relevant community-level intervention to address the systemic, societal, and individual level factors that serve as barriers to suicide prevention.

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Moldova and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: The importance of health system governance

Aim: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) arises where treatment is interrupted or inadequate, when patients are treated inappropriately, or when an individual has impaired immune function, which can lead to a rapid progression from infection with an MDR-strain to disease. This study examines the role of health systems in amplifying or preventing the development of MDR-TB. Methods: We present two comparative studies, which were undertaken in The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (TFYR Macedonia) and Moldova. Results: The findings reveal several health systems-level factors that contribute to the different rates of MDR-TB observed in these two countries, including: pre-existing burden of disease; organization of the health system, with the existence of parallel systems; power dynamics among policy makers and disease programmes; and the accountability & effectiveness of programme oversight. Conclusions: The findings do not offer a universal template for health system reform but do identify specific factors that may be contributing to the epidemic and are worthy of further attention in the two countries.

Racial Disparity in Outcomes Among Prostate Cancer Patients in the Post-Affordable Care Act Period.

Our objective was to assess whether Medicaid expansion is associated with reduced racial disparity in quality of care measured as 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and 30-day readmission in prostate cancer patients receiving surgery. We used the National Cancer Database to extract a cohort of African American and White men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2015 and surgically treated. We used 2004-2009 data to observe preexisting racial disparity in outcomes. We used 2010-2015 data to assess racial disparity in outcomes and the interaction of race and Medicaid expansion status. Between 2004 and 2009, 179,762 men met our criteria. In this period, African American patients reported higher hazard of 30- and 90-day mortality and higher odds of 30-day readmission compared to White patients. Between 2010 and 2015, 174,985 men met our criteria. Of these 84% were White and 16% were African American. Main effects models showed that compared to White men, African American men had higher odds of 30-day mortality (OR=1.96, 95% CI = 1.46, 2.67), 90-day mortality (OR=1.40, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.77), and 30-day readmission (OR=1.28, 95% CI = 1.19, 1.38).The interactions between race and Medicaid expansion were not significant (P = .1306, .9499, and .5080, respectively). Improved access to care via Medicaid expansion may not translate into reduced racial disparity in quality-of-care outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated surgically. System-level factors such as availability of and referrals to care, and complex socioeconomic structure may also play a role in improving quality of care and reducing disparities.

Factors influencing the conduction of confidential conversations with adolescents in the emergency department: A multicenter, qualitative analysis.

Health care providers (HCPs) in the emergency department (ED) frequently must decide whether to conduct or forego confidential conversations with adolescent patients about sensitive topics, such as those related to mental health, substance use, and sexual and reproductive health. The objective of this multicenter qualitative analysis was to identify factors that influence the conduct of confidential conversations with adolescent patients in the ED. In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews of ED HCPs from five academic, pediatric EDs in distinct geographic regions. We purposively sampled HCPs across gender, professional title, and professional experience. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to develop an interview guide to assess individual and system-level factors affecting HCP behavior regarding the conduct of confidential conversations with adolescents. Enrollment continued until we reached saturation. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by three investigators based on thematic analysis. We used the coded transcripts to collaboratively generate belief statements, which are first-person statements that reflect shared perspectives. We conducted 38 interviews (18 physicians, 11 registered nurses, five nurse practitioners, and four physician assistants). We generated 17 belief statements across nine TDF domains. Predominant influences on having confidential conversations included self-efficacy in speaking with adolescents alone, wanting to address sexual health complaints, maintaining patient flow, experiencing parental resistance and limited space, and having inadequate resources to address patient concerns and personal preconceptions about patients. Perspectives divided between wanting to provide focused medical care related only to their chief complaint versus self-identifying as a holistic medical HCP. The factors influencing the conduct of confidential conversations included multiple TDF domains, elucidating how numerous intersecting factors influence whether ED HCPs address sensitive adolescent health needs. These data suggest methods to enhance and facilitate confidential conversations when deemed appropriate in the care of adolescents in the ED.

Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated With Delayed Diagnosis of Appendicitis

Racial disparities in timely diagnosis and treatment of surgical conditions exist; however, it is poorly understood whether there are hospital structural measures or patient-level characteristics that modify this phenomenon. To assess whether patient race and ethnicity are associated with delayed appendicitis diagnosis and postoperative 30-day hospital use and whether there are patient- or systems-level factors that modify this association. This population-based, retrospective cohort study used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's state inpatient and emergency department (ED) databases from 4 states (Florida, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin) for patients aged 18 to 64 years who underwent appendectomy from January 7, 2016, to December 1, 2017. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017. Delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, defined as an initial ED presentation with an abdominal diagnosis other than appendicitis followed by re-presentation within a week for appendectomy. A mixed-effects multivariable Poisson regression model was used to estimate the association of delayed diagnosis of appendicitis with race and ethnicity while controlling for patient and hospital variables. A second mixed-effects multivariable Poisson regression model quantified the association of delayed diagnosis of appendicitis with postoperative 30-day hospital use. Of 80 312 patients who received an appendectomy during the study period (median age, 38 years [IQR, 27-50 years]; 50.8% female), 2013 (2.5%) experienced delayed diagnosis. In the entire cohort, 2.9% of patients were Asian or Pacific Islander, 18.8% were Hispanic, 10.9% were non-Hispanic Black, 60.8% were non-Hispanic White, and 6.6% were other race and ethnicity; most were privately insured (60.2%). Non-Hispanic Black patients had a 1.41 (95% CI, 1.21-1.63) times higher adjusted rate of delayed diagnosis compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Patients at hospitals with a more than 50% Black or Hispanic population had a 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59-0.91) decreased adjusted rate of delayed appendicitis diagnosis compared with hospitals with a less than 25% Black or Hispanic population. Conversely, patients at hospitals with more than 50% of discharges of Medicaid patients had a 3.51 (95% CI, 1.69-7.28) higher adjusted rate of delayed diagnosis compared with hospitals with less than 10% of discharges of Medicaid patients. Additional factors associated with delayed diagnosis included female sex, higher levels of patient comorbidity, and living in a low-income zip code. Delayed diagnosis was associated with a 1.38 (95% CI, 1.36-1.61) increased adjusted rate of postoperative 30-day hospital use. In this cohort study, non-Hispanic Black patients had higher rates of delayed appendicitis diagnosis and 30-day hospital use than White patients. Patients presenting to hospitals with a greater than 50% Black and Hispanic population were less likely to experience delayed diagnosis, suggesting that seeking care at a hospital that serves a diverse patient population may help mitigate the increased rate of delayed diagnosis observed for non-Hispanic Black patients.

Disparities in thoracic surgical oncology.

Disparities in access and outcomes of thoracic surgical oncology are long standing. This article examines the patient, population, and systems-level factors that contribute to these disparities and inequities. The need for research and policy to identify and solve these problems is apparent. As leaders in the field of thoracic oncology, surgeons will be instrumental in narrowing these gaps and moving the discipline forward.

Factors associated with follow-up care after pediatric concussion: A longitudinal population-based study in Alberta, Canada.

Concussion is a common injury in children and adolescents. Current best practice guidelines indicate that recovery should be supervised through recurrent follow-up visits. A more detailed understanding of the system-level and individual factors that are associated with follow-up care is a critical step towards increasing evidence-based practice. The objective of this study was to identify predisposing, enabling, and need-based factors associated with follow-up care after pediatric concussion. A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using linked, province-wide administrative health data for all patients <18 years of age with a diagnosis of concussion, other specified injuries of the head, unspecified injury of head, or post-concussion syndrome (PCS) between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2018 in Alberta, Canada. The association between predisposing, enabling, and need-based factors and the receipt of follow-up care within a defined episode of care (EOC) was analyzed using logistic regression models for the entire cohort and for EOC that began with a concussion diagnosis. Predisposing factors included age and sex. Enabling factors included the community type of patient residence, area-based socioeconomic status (SES), and visit year. Need-based factors included where the EOC began (outpatient vs. emergency settings) and history of previous concussion-related EOC. 194,081 EOCs occurred during the study period but only 13% involved follow-up care (n = 25,461). Males and adolescents were more likely to receive follow-up care. Follow-up was less likely among patients who lived in remote communities or in areas of lower SES, while EOCs beginning in 2011 or later were more likely to involve follow-up care. Patients whose EOC began in outpatient settings, had more than one EOC, or a diagnosis of concussion were more likely to receive follow-up care. Follow-up care for pediatric concussion has increased over time and is associated with patient age and sex, history of concussion-related EOC, where a patient lives (community type and area-based SES), and when and where the index visit occurs. A better understanding of which children are more likely to receive follow-up care, as well as how and when they do, is an important step in aligning practice with follow-up guidelines.

The Veterans Health Administration's integrated model of care increases accessibility and delivery of mental health services.

Depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are two of the most common mental health conditions experienced by veterans. It is unclear what individual and system level factors are associated with receiving mental health treatment for these concerns. Using a national sample of Gulf War Era veterans who endorsed lifetime diagnoses of either depression or PTSD (N = 425), regression analyses were used to predict past-year treatment utilization. Predictor variables were those indicated in the behavioral model of health care utilization, including predisposing demographic variables (e.g., age, race), enabling variables (e.g., service connection, enrollment in Veterans Health Administration [VHA]), and need-based variables (e.g., current symptom severity). VHA enrollment was associated with a three- and five-times higher odds of being treated for depression or PTSD, respectively. Income and symptom severity were also positively associated with treatment utilization. Among individuals with diagnoses of depression and/or PTSD, VHA enrollment was the strongest predictor of receiving mental health treatment for these diagnoses, controlling for all other variables in the model including recent contact with the health care system, current symptom severity, and the presence of other enabling resources. Results suggest that the VHA's integrated model of care increases accessibility and delivery of effective mental health services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Evaluation of factors influencing physician–patientcommunication in healthcare service delivery

Physician–patient communication has received less focus in the study of healthcare service delivery in Nigeria. Themajority of communication relies on message delivery rather than interpersonal communication. Even when doctorshave significant knowledge to share with their patients, they frequently lack the interpersonal communicationskills required to do it successfully. This quantitative study employed the analysis of 150 valid responses frompracticing physicians in Lagos state. Descriptive statistics were carried out to understand the factors influencingphysician–patient communication. The results revealed good communication skills among physicians as theyagreed to have social conversations with patients, listen intently to them, and promote question-asking. Theresponses from the survey also revealed that factors such as limited consultation time and unfavorable workingenvironments could negatively impact physician–patient communication. Furthermore, the test hypothesis revealeda significant correlation between physicians’ age and gender (p&lt;0.05), whereas physicians’ ethnicity andreligion had non-significant associations. The evaluation of factors influencing physician–patient communicationrevealed that several individual and contextual factors contribute to effective communication, including physiciancommunication skills, patient health literacy, and system-level factors such as time constraints and workload.Healthcare organizations and policymakers should prioritize efforts to improve physician–patient communicationby addressing the identified factors that influence communication and implementing evidence-based interventionsto enhance communication between physicians and patients.

“I know what I'm supposed to do, but I don't do it”: patient-perceived risk factors that lead to their lower extremity amputations

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to extend on our previous research by exploring patient-perceived factors that lead to their Lower Extremity Amputations (LEA). LEA are a serious complication of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), LEA are thought to be preventable with early detection and management of risk factors. Our previous study identified that these factors extend beyond the typical biological and modifiable risk factors and may also extend to patient awareness and competing priorities. Therefore, this research explored these issues in further detail, identifying patient-perceived factors that lead to their LEA.MethodsA qualitative descriptive methodology involving non-probability purposive sampling was used to recruit inpatients at a tertiary metropolitan hospital in South Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were transcribed verbatim. Data from the interviews were analysed using thematic analysis and the constant comparison approach.ResultsA total of 15 participants shared their perspectives of risk factors for LEA. Two main themes emerged: intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Intrinsic factors identified in this study included identity, ambivalence, denial, inevitability, and helplessness. Extrinsic factors related to resources, rapport with healthcare professionals, and management of care.ConclusionsThrough identifying that a combination of perceived personal attributes (intrinsic) and system-level (extrinsic) factors likely contribute to LEA, this study highlights the complexity of factors that contribute to patients' perceptions of what led to their diabetes related LEA. These findings support the importance of a nuanced approach in managing patients with diabetes who are at risk of LEA as it's likely patients’ personal circumstances, day-to-day life’s requirements and responsibilities, their interaction with healthcare professionals all seemingly contribute to how risks are viewed and managed. Tackling this challenge will require reimagining diabetes care, acknowledgement of risk factors beyond the obvious and addressing persistent access and workforce issues.

The impact of delaying surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta: a qualitative study.

The COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed health care systems, leading many jurisdictions to reduce surgeries to create capacity (beds and staff) to care for the surge of patients with COVID-19; little is known about the impact of this on patients whose surgery was delayed. The objective of this study was to understand the patient and family/caregiver perspective of having a surgery delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using an interpretative descriptive approach, we conducted interviews between Sept. 20 and Oct. 8, 2021. Adult patients who had their surgery delayed or cancelled during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta, Canada, and their family/caregivers were eligible to participate. Trained interviewers conducted semistructured interviews, which were iteratively analyzed by 2 independent reviewers using an inductive approach to thematic content analysis. We conducted 16 interviews with 15 patients and 1 family member/caregiver, ranging from 27 to 75 years of age, with a variety of surgical procedures delayed. We identified 4 interconnected themes: individual-level impacts on physical and mental health, family and friends, work and quality of life; system-level factors related to health care resources, communication and perceived accountability within the system; unique issues related to COVID-19 (maintaining health and isolation); and uncertainty about health and timing of surgery. Although the decision to delay nonurgent surgeries was made to manage the strain on health care systems, our study illustrates the consequences of these decisions, which were diffuse and consequential. The findings of this study highlight the need to develop and adopt strategies to mitigate the burden of waiting for surgery during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pre-implementation formative evaluation of cooperative pain education and self-management expanding treatment for real-world access: A pragmatic pain trial.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (CBT-CP) is an evidence-based treatment for improving functioning and pain intensity for people with chronic pain with extensive evidence of effectiveness. However, there has been relatively little investigation of the factors associated with successful implementation and uptake of CBT-CP, particularly clinician and system level factors. This formative evaluation examined barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation and uptake of CBT-CP from the perspective of CBT-CP clinicians and referring primary care clinicians. Qualitative interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research were conducted at nine geographically diverse Veterans Affairs sites as part of a pragmatic clinical trial comparing synchronous, clinician-delivered CBT-CP and remotely delivered, technology-assisted CBT-CP. Analysis was informed by a grounded theory approach. Twenty-six clinicians (CBT-CP clinicians=17, primary care clinicians=9) from nine VA medical centers participated in individual qualitative interviews conducted by telephone from April 2019 to August 2020. Four themes emerged in the qualitative interviews: (1) the complexity and variability of referral pathways across sites, (2) referring clinician's lack of knowledge about CBT-CP, (3) referring clinician's difficulty identifying suitable candidates for CBT-CP, and (4) preference for interventions that can be completed from home. This formative evaluation identified clinician and system barriers to widespread implementation of CBT-CP and allowed for refinement of the subsequent implementation of two forms of CBT-CP in an ongoing pragmatic trial. Identification of relative difference in barriers and facilitators in the two forms of CBT-CP may emerge more clearly in a pragmatic trial that evaluates how treatments perform in real-world settings and may provide important information to guide future system-wide implementation efforts.

Factors leading to foster care reentry: experiences of housing unstable families

ABSTRACT Children from housing unstable families have a high risk of reentering the child welfare system. However, to our knowledge, no studies have specifically explored qualitative factors related to child welfare reentry among housing unstable families focusing on their and their service providers’ perspectives. This study was a qualitative follow-up on findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to promote safe and timely reunification among housing unstable families. We explored the perspectives of seven housing-unstable caregivers whose children had reentered the foster care system, and 12 service providers regarding factors associated with foster-care reentry. Applying Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and ecological systems theory, our findings revealed that individual level (e.g., domestic violence, substance abuse, mental health) and system level (e.g., service provider prejudice and bias) factors were associated with foster care reentry. We offer suggestions for implications for research, policy, and practice.

FREQUENT USERS OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES IN A METROPOLITAN CITY: INDIVIDUAL- AND SYSTEM-LEVEL CONSIDERATIONS

Abstract Frequent 911 calls from older adults place a significant burden on emergency response systems. Drawing from key informant interviews, we explore factors implicated in repeated Emergency Medical Services (EMS) among older people in the City of Los Angeles and provide system and policy recommendations to mitigate overuse of EMS 911 calls. Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) dispatch call records documented 370,016 EMS encounters from 202,471 unique individuals over 50 from 2012 to 2016. Frequent 911 callers over the age of 50 (n=8), family members (n=6), Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) personnel (n=10), and community service providers (n=3) participated in in-depth, qualitative interviews to understand individual- and system-level factors that increase the likelihood of repeated calls. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Guided by Grounded Theory, two themes emerged across all interviewee groups pointing to factors that contributed to 911 calls: 1) The Nature of 911 Calls; 2) Barriers to Access. Patients and family members were aligned on a third theme: 3) Previous Encounters: Interactions with emergency care providers, while LAFD and service providers were in agreement on a fourth theme: 4) The Role of EMS Responders and Community Providers. All groups provided recommendations for the theme, 5) Change the System so that 911 calls do not serve as the default choice. Findings demonstrate the need to improve coordination between LAFD, medical and human service providers. Care coordination can support individual- and system-level supports for patients and families to address their needs and reduce repeated EMS use.

The integration of primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care: a scoping review.

This scoping review describes existing care models that integrate primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care, examines the effectiveness of these models, and characterizes barriers and facilitators to their integration. A systematic search (PubMed®, CINAHL®, Embase®) was conducted to identify citations which were evaluated against inclusion criteria using the PICOTTS framework. The PRISMA-ScR extension for scoping reviews was used to report review findings (protocol https://osf.io/92xbg ). Twenty-three studies were included. Three care models integrating primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care were identified: consultative shared care in a primary care setting (N = 3); longitudinal shared care (N = 2); and PCP-led care employing a survivorship care plan (N = 5). While many described risk-adapted care, few used risk stratification approaches to inform care. Measures of model effectiveness varied, with discrepant findings regarding late effects detection in PCP-led approaches. The most frequently cited barriers and facilitators reflected provider- and system-level factors (PCP knowledge/experience identified as greatest barrier (N = 11); clinical information from oncologist identified as greatest facilitator (N = 9)). Identified models depended on PCP knowledge and healthcare system coordination, and studies suggested the need for strong oncologic involvement in follow-up care. Improved training for PCPs and the coordinated transfer of clinical information could facilitate their involvement in such care. Overall, standardized measures of effectiveness are needed to deliver optimal childhood cancer survivorship care. The literature revealed three care models defined by SCP use, provider involvement, and continuity of care, with several studies recommending oncologic involvement in follow-up care for high-risk survivors.

System-level factors influencing refugee women's access and utilization of sexual and reproductive health services: A qualitative study of providers' perspectives.

Refugee women have poor outcomes and low utilization of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, which may be driven by access to and quality of SRH services at their resettled destinations. While healthcare providers offer valuable insights into these topics, little research has explored United States (U.S.) providers' experiences. To fill this literature gap, we investigate U.S. providers' perspectives of healthcare system-related factors influencing refugee women's access and utilization of SRH services. Between July and December 2019, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 17 providers serving refugee women in metropolitan Atlanta in the state of Georgia (United States). We used convenience and snowball sampling for recruitment. We inquired about system-related resources, facilitators, and barriers influencing SRH services access and utilization. Two coders analyzed the data using a qualitative thematic approach. We found that transportation availability was crucial to refugee women's SRH services access. Providers noted a tension between refugee women's preferred usage of informal interpretation assistance (e.g., family and friends) and healthcare providers' desire for more formal interpretation services. Providers reported a lack of funding and human resources to offer comprehensive SRH services as well as several challenges with using a referral system for women to get SRH care in other systems. Culturally and linguistically-concordant patient navigators were successful at helping refugee women navigate the healthcare system and addressing language barriers. We discussed implications for future research and practice to improve refugee women's SRH care access and utilization. In particular, our findings underscore multilevel constraints of clinics providing SRH care to refugee women and highlight the importance of transportation services and acceptable interpretation services. While understudied, the use of patient navigators holds potential for increasing refugee women's SRH care access and utilization. Patient navigation can both effectively address language-related challenges for refugee women and help them navigate the healthcare system for SRH. Future research should explore organizational and external factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of patient navigators for refugee women's SRH care.

System and policy-level barriers and facilitators for timely and accurate diagnosis of young onset dementia.

The multiyear diagnostic journey for young onset dementia (YOD) is fraught with clinical and personal difficulties and poses significant uncertainty for people living with YOD and their families. Most existing research has examined the personal and/or clinical barriers to a timely diagnosis of YOD, but less evidence exists regarding system level factors. The aim of this study is to investigate health professionals' insights for a timely and accurate YOD diagnosis at the system level. Grounded theory qualitative study. Semi-structured in-depth interviews with 11 health professionals working across varied healthcare settings were conducted online via videoconference. Data were contrasted and compared within and between transcripts using the constant comparative method. Seven themes emerged about barriers and facilitators for timely and accurate diagnosis of YOD: (1) stigma and awareness of YOD; (2) mismatched policy; (3) fractured health system; (4) inadequate pathways for YOD diagnostic care; (5) effective use of General Practitioners; (6) inequitable access and fragmented service navigation; (7) diverse and marginalised groups. A complex web of systemic and system level barriers contributes to the delay of accurate and timely diagnosis for YOD. Diverse and marginalised groups experience greater inequitable disadvantage regarding YOD diagnostic care. There is an urgent need to focus on YOD diagnosis facilitators at the broader health system level.

Context matters: toward a multilevel perspective on context in clinical reasoning and error.

Context in diagnosis and management of patients is a vexing phenomenon in medicine and health professions education that can lead to unwanted variation in clinical reasoning performance and even errors that cause patient harm. Studies have examined individual-, team-, andsystem-level contextual factors, but the ways in whichmultiple contextual factors can interact, how both distracting and enabling factors can impact performance and error, and the boundaries between context and content information are not well understood. In this paper, we use a theory-based approach to enhance our understanding ofcontext. We introduce a multilevel perspective on context that extends prior models of clinical reasoning and propose a micro-meso-macro framework to provide a more integrated understanding of how clinical reasoning is bothinfluenced by and emerges from multiple contextual factors. The multilevel approach can also be used to study other social phenomena in medicine such as professionalism, learning, burnout, and implicit bias. We call for a new paradigm in clinical reasoning research and education that uses multilevel theory and analysis to enhance clinical reasoning performance expertise and improve the quality of patient care.

Implementation Plan for a High-Frequency, Low-Touch Care Model at Specialized Type 1 Diabetes Clinics: Model Development.

Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are more likely to achieve optimal glycemic management when they have frequent visits with their health care team. There is a potential benefit of frequent, telemedicine interventions as an effective strategy to lower hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). The objective is this study was to understand the provider- and system-level factors affecting the successful implementation of a virtual care intervention in type 1 diabetes (T1D) clinics. Semistructured interviews were conducted with managers and certified diabetes educators (CDEs) at diabetes clinics across Southern Ontario before the COVID-19 pandemic. Deductive analysis was carried out using the Theoretical Domains Framework, followed by mapping to behavior change techniques to inform potential implementation strategies for high-frequency virtual care for T1D. There was considerable intention to deliver high-frequency virtual care to patients with T1D. Participants believed that this model of care could lead to improved patient outcomes and engagement but would likely increase the workload of CDEs. Some felt there were insufficient resources at their site to enable them to participate in the program. Member checking conducted during the pandemic revealed that clinics and staff had already developed strategies to overcome resource barriers to the adoption of virtual care during the pandemic. Existing enablers for high-frequency virtual care for T1D can be leveraged, and barriers can be overcome with targeted clinical incentives and support.