Systemic Analgesia Research Articles

A Cross-Sectional Study of Labor Analgesia Practices Across India

Introduction: Labour analgesia practices have evolved significantly over the past years, with most of the current practices being evidence-based. Labour analgesia is considered a standard of care in resource-rich countries. However, in resource-limited countries such as India, there is a lack of awareness, and round the clock availability of labour analgesia services across the country. This raises significant challenges in establishing successful labour analgesia programs. Methods: This survey was conducted using multi-question Google Form@, so as to improve our understanding of labour analgesia practices in India. Our primary objective was to study the prevalence of labour analgesia practices amongst anaesthesiologists across India. Our secondary objectives included the work profile of anaesthesiologists providing labour analgesia, common techniques of labour analgesia practised, drugs used and common complications as well as side-effects encountered. Results: The results of our survey showed that 72.9% of the respondents practised labour analgesia in one form or the other. Practitioners in non-government facilities such as private hospitals, private medical colleges, and nursing homes accounted for more than 60% of the total labour analgesia delivered. Government medical colleges fared the best among practitioners at government-owned facilities. Approximately 85% of those polled agreed that the most common way of pain relief in a labouring patient was regional analgesia. The most prevalent was labour epidural (59.4%), followed by a single shot spinal analgesic, while 29% of anaesthesiologists used systemic analgesia. Conclusion: The impediments to delivering widespread labour analgesia services across India were poor infrastructure and high costs.

Prevention and management of rebound pain after resolution of regional block: a systematic review.

An extreme pain known as rebound pain develops after regional blockage wears off. Patient, surgical, and anesthesia-related factors influence the occurrence and intensity of rebound pain. Prior to the peripheral nerve block (PNB) being resolved, multimodal therapy should use. The objective of this review was to explore rebound pain prevention and management following PNB resolution. We conducted a thorough search across Pub Med, Hinari, Google Scholar, and Cochrane review databases, utilizing relevant keywords and search parameters to identify studies meeting our inclusion criteria. These studies aimed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the prevention and management of rebound pain following the resolution of regional blocks. Duplicate entries were removed using Endnote software. Screening of the literature was performed using a rigorous appraisal checklist. The findings of this review are reported in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Using an electronic search, 3526 items were found from databases and websites. After removing duplicates (n=500), 3026 articles remained. Of these, 2813 were excluded after going through their titles and abstracts. Of the 213 articles screened, 126 were removed for such reasons as ineligibility or similarity in objectives. Of the remaining 87 studies, 37 were excluded for such reasons as the inaccessibility of free full texts. Finally, 50 studies were included for review. Proper patient education about rebound pain, combined with the utilization of multimodal systemic analgesia before the resolution of PNBs, perineural dexamethasone, and employing a combination of nerve blocks, has been demonstrated to decrease the incidence of rebound pain. Therefore, clinicians should aim to prevent and manage rebound pain by implementing perioperative multimodal strategies before the resolution of regional blocks.

Can a Sacrococcygeal Epidural of 0.25% Bupivacaine Prevent the Activation of the Sympathetic Nervous System during Feline Ovariectomy?

The ovariectomy (OVE) procedure can trigger somatosensory and visceral peritoneal nociception. Sacrococcygeal epidural (ScE) anesthesia may complement or replace systemic analgesia used for feline OVE, reducing opioid consumption and their related undesirable adverse effects and consequently reducing or completely blocking the sympathetic nervous system activation during this procedure. The present study aimed to evaluate the activation of the sympathetic nervous system resulting from adding an ScE injection of bupivacaine 0.25% (0.3 mL kg-1) in feline OVE and identify whether this translates to hemodynamic variables stability. A Parasympathetic Tone Activity (PTA) monitor was applied given that it performs analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) detecting changes in sympathetic and parasympathetic tone, making it a good tool for detecting activation of the sympathetic nervous system during the study. Two groups of animals were evaluated in five perioperative times, namely, the control group (CG) (n = 18) with systemic analgesia alone and the sacrococcygeal epidural group (ScEG) (n = 20) with 0.25% bupivacaine combined with systemic analgesia. Thirty-eight female cats were selected. All animals assigned to CG and ScEG were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (20 μg kg-1 IM) and methadone (0.2 mg kg-1 IM). General anesthesia was induced with propofol IV ad effectum and maintained with isoflurane in 100% oxygen. Heart rate, non-invasive systolic and median blood pressure, respiratory rate, and instantaneous parasympathetic tone activity were recorded. Compared to systemic analgesia alone (CG), sacrococcygeal epidural (ScEG) reduced the rise of common hemodynamic variables but did not prevent sympathetic nervous system activation.

Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain relief in major traumatic spine surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Spine fixation surgery for traumatic vertebral fractures is associated with severe pain and is often difficult to control. Traditionally systemic opioids have been the mainstay of analgesia for these procedures, which can lead to hyperalgesia, nausea, ileus, sedation, cognitive impairment, dependence, etc., limiting usage of opioids. The Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel ultrasound-guided procedure with easily identifiable sonoanatomy. We hypothesized that a multimodal approach involving ESPB to a conventional analgesic regimen with local infiltration for patients undergoing major traumatic spine surgeries might provide better perioperative analgesia and reduce the need for postoperative opioid requirements. A randomized control prospective trial was conducted on 34 ASA grade I -II patients aged 18 to 65 years who were scheduled to undergo elective posterior spine fixation surgery with ASIA B to E after traumatic spine fracture under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized to Group A which included patients who received general anesthesia with ESPB, and Group B, or the control group, included patients who received general anesthesia with systemic analgesics and postoperative local infiltration without ESPB. Intraoperative total fentanyl consumption, VAS score at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours, time to activate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, total morphine consumption, and opioid-related side effects were monitored and compared in both groups. Postoperative PCA morphine consumption was significantly lower in group A patients who received ESPB than those in the control group (17.06 ± 9.59 vs 37.82 ± 9.88 P value = <0.0001). VAS scores at rest and movement at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 hours were significantly lower (P value = 0.05) in the ESPB group compared with the control group at all time points. Bilateral ultrasound-guided Erector spinae plane block, when administered in traumatic spine patients undergoing spine fixation surgery, provides better analgesia with statistically decreased VAS scores and less postoperative opioid requirement.

Battle of the Blocks: Which Pain Management Technique Triumphs in Gender-Affirming Bilateral Mastectomies?

Gender-affirming mastectomy, performed on transgender men and non-binary individuals, frequently leads to considerable postoperative pain. This pain can significantly affect both patient satisfaction and the overall recovery process. The study examines the efficacy of four analgesic techniques pectoral nerve (PECS) 2 block, erector spinae plane (ESP) block, thoracic wall local anesthesia infiltration (TWI), and systemic multimodal analgesia (SMA) in managing perioperative pain, with special consideration for the effects of chronic testosterone therapy on pain thresholds. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 18 - 45 who underwent gender-affirming bilateral mastectomies at a New York City community hospital. The study compared intraoperative and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, the interval to first rescue analgesia, and total PACU duration among the four analgesic techniques. The study found significant differences in intraoperative and PACU opioid consumption across the groups, with the PECS 2 block group showing the least opioid requirement. The PACU morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption was highest in the SMA group. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the PECS and ESP groups at earlier time points post-surgery. However, by postoperative day 2, pain scores did not significantly differ among the groups. Chronic testosterone therapy did not significantly impact intraoperative opioid requirements. The PECS 2 block is superior in reducing overall opioid consumption and providing effective postoperative pain control in gender-affirming mastectomies. The study underscores the importance of tailoring pain management strategies to the unique physiological responses of the transgender and non-binary community. Future research should focus on prospective designs, standardized block techniques, and the complex relationship between hormonal therapy and pain perception.

Thoracotomy: An Overview of Perioperative Anaesthetic Management

Background: The anesthesiologist's role during open thoracotomy includes using a double lumen tube (DLT) for lung isolation, maintaining oxygenation with one-lung ventilation (OLV), and providing postoperative analgesia. This study aims to describe patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative anesthetic management, complications, and the effectiveness of epidural catheter analgesia. Methods: In this prospective, observational study, patients who underwent open thoracotomy for decortications were evaluated. Thoracotomy was done under general anaesthesia, OLV with DLT, and epidural analgesia. Postoperatively, all the patients were shifted to the intensive care unit. Collected data included patient demographics, associated co-morbidities, severity of lung diseases, complications, and postoperative recovery. Postoperative analgesia was assessed by the visual analogue scale (0-10). Result: Of 20 patients, 16 were male, and 4 were female, with a mean age of 35 years (range 15-60) and a mean weight of 52 kg (range 36-66). History of hypertension (N=5), hypertension with diabetes (N=3), obstructive lung disease (N=6), restrictive lung disease (N=11), and both combined (N=3) were noted on pre-anesthetic check-ups. Intraoperative complications were hypotension (N=3), desaturation (N=3), respiratory acidosis (N =7), and metabolic acidosis (N=3). Postoperative analgesia was managed with an epidural catheter (N=18) &amp; systemic analgesia (N=2). All patients had uneventful postoperative courses except one patient who had pulmonary edema and did not survive. Conclusion: Patients undergoing open thoracotomy had an increased risk for adverse perioperative outcomes. The incidences of perioperative morbidity are high in patients with associated comorbidities. Proper OLV strategy helps to correct intraoperative desaturation. Epidural analgesia plays a key role in postoperative recovery.

Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Compared with Other Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Distal Upper Limb Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Several regional anesthesia (RA) techniques have been described for distal upper limb surgery. However, the best approach in terms of RA block success rate and safety is not well recognized. Objective: To assess and compare the surgical anesthesia and efficacy of axillary brachial plexus block with other RA techniques for hand and wrist surgery. The attainment of adequate surgical anesthesia 30 min after block placement was considered a primary outcome measure. Additionally, successful block outcomes were required without the use of supplemental local anesthetic injection, systemic opioid analgesia, or the need to convert to general anesthesia. Methods: We performed a systematic search in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CENTRAL. RCTs comparing axillary blocks with other brachial plexus block techniques, distal peripheral forearm nerve block, intravenous RA, and the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique were included. Results: In total, 3070 records were reviewed, of which 28 met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of adequate surgical anesthesia showed no significant difference between ultrasound-guided axillary block and supraclavicular block (RR: 0.94 [0.89, 1.00]; p = 0.06; I2 = 60.00%), but a statistically significant difference between ultrasound-guided axillary block and infraclavicular block (RR: 0.92 [0.88, 0.97]; p < 0.01; I2 = 53.00%). Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks were performed faster than ultrasound-guided axillary blocks (SMD: 0.74 [0.30, 1.17]; p < 0.001; I2 = 85.00%). No differences in performance time between ultrasound-guided axillary and supraclavicular blocks were demonstrated. Additionally, adequate surgical anesthesia onset time was not significantly different between ultrasound-guided block approaches: ultrasound-guided axillary blocks versus ultrasound-guided supraclavicular blocks (SMD: 0.52 [-0.14, 1.17]; p = 0.12; I2 = 86.00%); ultrasound-guided axillary blocks versus ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks (SMD: 0.21 [-0.49, 0.91]; p = 0.55; I2 = 92.00%). Conclusions: The RA choice should be individualized depending on the patient, procedure, and operator-specific parameters. Compared to ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular block, ultrasound-guided axillary block may be preferred for patients with significant concerns of block-related side effects/complications. High heterogeneity between studies shows the need for more robust RCTs.

A comparison of fascia iliaca compartment block with intravenous analgesia to improve pain control in patients with femoral fracture.

The most common approach to managing severe pain following femoral fracture is with intravenous systemic analgesics, such as opioid analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs associated with side effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting. These side effects might be intolerable in trauma patients and may result in under treatment of pain. Improving the quality of analgesia may reduce these intolerable side effects. Our study compared the efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) with intravenous analgesics for preoperative pain management of femoral fractures. The study was a quality improvement prospective randomised study, where 50 patients aged between 18 and 65 years, and American society of anesthesiologists I and II were recruited into two groups. Group A received FICB with a combination of 0.4 mL/kg of 0.5% plain bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200,000 made up to 30 mL, while group B received placebo FICB using 30 mL normal saline. Also, group B received a combination of intravenous paracetamol 15 mg/kg not exceeding 900 mg and tramadol 1 mg/kg not exceeding 100 mg, while group A received an equal volume as normal saline intravenously. The study revealed no significant difference in age, gender, associated injuries, X-ray description of fractures, and mechanism of injuries; however, there was a significant difference in the NRS-pain score at 30 min, summed pain intensity difference for 4 h and patient satisfaction in the FICB group compared to the standard group. The study revealed that FICB results in better pain control compared to a combination of intravenous tramadol and paracetamol in patients with femoral fractures.

Analysis of Natural Antibodies during the Development of Phantom Pain Syndrome.

We determined natural antibodies (n-Abs) to the regulators of the main systems of biochemical homeostasis: β-endorphin, serotonin, dopamine, histamine, orphanin, angiotensin, GABA, glutamate, bradykinin, vasopressin, thrombin, and α-2-macroglobulin in individuals with phantom pain syndrome (PPS), resulting from amputation after injury. It was established that each patient has an individual immunoprofile, but for all of them there was a significant increase in the level of antibodies to serotonin, histamine, and angiotensin, which reflect the chronicity of the pain syndrome and do not depend on the self-assessment of the severity of PPS. Determination of the role of regulators of biochemical homeostasis in the development of phantom pain showed that, at high, moderate, and weak severity of PPS, the biogenic amine and angiotensinergic systems are activated. A decrease in PPS intensity normalizes deviations in all immunological parameters. The levels of n-Abs for the pain (β-endorphin) and analgesic (orphanin) systems are significant only at low PPS. Monitoring the individual profile of n-Abs to endogenous regulators allows us to obtain an objective picture of the pain status of the patient's body.

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Peripheral Nerve Simulator-Guided Brachial Plexus Block in Rabbits Undergoing Orthopaedic Surgery Compared to Systemic Analgesia.

Locoregional anaesthetic techniques are invaluable for providing multimodal analgesia for painful surgical procedures. This prospective, randomised study describes a nerve stimulator-guided brachial plexus blockade (BPB) in rabbits undergoing orthopaedic surgery in comparison to systemic lidocaine. Premedication was provided with intramuscular (IM) medetomidine, fentanyl, and midazolam. Anaesthesia was induced (propofol IV) and maintained with isoflurane. Nine rabbits received a lidocaine BPB (2%; 0.3 mL kg-1), and eight received a lidocaine constant rate infusion (CRI) (2 mg kg-1 IV, followed by 100 µg kg-1 min-1). Rescue analgesia was provided with fentanyl IV. Carprofen was administered at the end of the surgery. Postoperative pain was determined using the Rabbit Grimace Scale (RGS) and a composite pain scale. Buprenorphine was administered according to the pain score for two hours after extubation. Rabbits were filmed during the first two hours to measure distance travelled and behaviours. Food intake and faeces output were compared. Every rabbit in CRI required intraoperative rescue analgesia compared to none in BPB. However, rabbits in both groups had similar pain scores, and there was no difference in the administration of postoperative analgesia. There were no significant differences in food intake or faeces production over 18 h, and no significant differences in distance travelled or behaviours examined during the first two hours. BPB seems superior for intraoperative analgesia. Postoperatively, both groups were comparable.

Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption of Paravertebral Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block After Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background Thoracotomy is associated with severe postoperative pain. Pain developing after thoracotomy causes lung infections, inability to expel secretions, and atelectasis as a result of deep breathing. Effective management of acute pain after thoracotomy may prevent these complications. A multimodal approach to analgesia is widely employed by thoracic anesthetists using a combination of regional anesthetic blockade and systemic analgesia, with both non-opioid and opioid medications and local anesthesia blockade. Nowadays, regional anesthesia techniques such as thoracic epidural paravertebral block (PVB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and serratus plane block are frequently used to prevent pain after thoracotomy. In this study, we compared paravertebral block with erector spinae block for pain relief after thoracotomy. Our primary aim was to determine whether there was a difference between postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores. We also compared the two regional anesthesia techniques in terms of intraoperative hemodynamic data and postoperative complications. Methodology Patients aged between 18 and 75 years with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-III and scheduled for elective thoracotomy were included in the study. Using www.randomizer.org, patients were divided into two different groups, namely, ESPB and PVB.All patients were provided with a patient-controlled analgesia device preloaded with morphine. Postoperative 24-hour morphine consumptions were recorded. Results Data from 45 patients were used in the final analyses. Morphine consumption was higher in the ESPB group than in the PVB group at 24 hours postoperatively (19.2 ± 4.26 mg and 16.2 ± 2.64 mg, respectively; p < 0.05).There was no significant difference in numerical rating scale scores both at rest and with coughing (p > 0.05). Intraoperative heart rates were similar between groups. However, mean intraoperative blood pressure was significantly lower in the PVB group at 30 minutes (p < 0.05). Nausea and vomiting were observed in two patients in the ESPB group and one patient in the PVB group. The complication of nausea and vomiting was not statistically significant between the two groups (p > 0.05). Catastrophic complications such as hematoma, pneumothorax, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity were not observed in either group. Conclusions We found that patients who underwent PVB consumed less morphine postoperatively than patients who underwent ESPB. However, we did not observe any difference in pain scores between both groups. We think that ESPB can be considered a reliable method in thoracotomy surgery due to its ease of application and the fact that the place where the block is technically performed is farther from the central structures compared to PVB.In light of the results of our study, ESPB can be used as an alternative to PVB, which has been proven as postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery.

New therapeutic strategies in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent arthritis-type and is a major contributor to chronic joint pain, impaired physical function, and limited mobility. By the end of 2020, a total of 595 million, equal to 7·6% of the global population, had OA; this figure is expected to rise exponentially by 2050. Even while the disorder's intricate pathophysiology is starting to appear intelligible, we are yet to have a cure for the disorder. OA is typically managed with traditional palliative measures, such as topical and systemic analgesics, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, therapeutic exercise, and braces. Sometimes, intra-articular glucocorticoids, viscosupplementation, or regenerative interventions provide short-term pain relief and functional improvement; some may require arthroplasty. Researchers continue their efforts to unveil a new therapeutic target to be effective in OA that modifies symptoms and arrests disease progression as well. In the present literature review, insights into new therapeutic strategies in OA, for example, liposome-based dexamethasone, microspore-based triamcinolone, nerve growth factor antagonist, anti-ADAMTS-5 (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase Thrombospoidin Motifs - 5), pentosan polysulfate sodium, allogeneic stem cells, C-C chemokine receptor type-4 (CCR4) ligand 17 inhibitor, Wnt-signaling inhibitor, and anti-obesity medications are provided.

The effect of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block on postoperative analgesia in robot assisted prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Postoperative pain continues to represent an important problem even after minimally invasive robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, which results in discomfort in the postoperative period and sometimes prolongs hospital stays. Regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are used in addition to systemic analgesics with the multimodal approach in postoperative pain management. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks are becoming increasingly important, especially in minimally invasive surgeries. Another important cause of discomfort is urinary catheter pain. The present randomized controlled study investigated the effect of rectus sheath block on postoperative pain and catheter-related bladder discomfort in robotic prostatectomy operations. This randomized controlled trial was conducted from March to August 2022. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Approval for the study was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. All individuals provided written informed consent, and adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Condition classification I to III planned for robotic prostatectomy operations under general anesthesia were enrolled. Following computer-assisted randomization, patients were divided into 2 groups, and general anesthesia was induced in all cases. Rectus sheath block was performed under general anesthesia and at the end of the surgery. No fascial plane block was applied to the patients in the non-rectus sheath block (RSB) group.Postoperative pain and urinary catheter pain were assessed using a numerical rating scale. Fentanyl was planned as rescue analgesia in the recovery room. In case of numerical rating scale scores of 4 or more, patients were given 50 µg fentanyl IV, repeated if necessary. The total fentanyl dose administered was recorded in the recovery room. IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia was planned for all patients. All patients' pain (postoperative pain at surgical site and urethral catheter discomfort) scores and total morphine consumption in the recovery unit and during follow-ups on the ward (3, 6, 12, and 24 hours) in the postoperative period were recorded. Sixty-one patients were evaluated. Total tramadol consumption during follow-up on the ward was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Fentanyl consumption in the postanesthesia care unit was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Total morphine consumption was significantly lower in the RSB group at 0 to 12 hours and 12 to 24 hours. Total opioid consumption was 8.81 mg in the RSB group and 19.87 mg in the non-RSB group. A statistically significant decrease in urethral catheter pain was noted in the RSB group at all time points. RSB exhibits effective analgesia by significantly reducing postoperative opioid consumption in robotic prostatectomy operations.

Effect of Preemptive Systemic Patient-controlled Analgesia in Evisceration

Purpose: To investigate the effect of preemptive systemic analgesia using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on postoperative pain after evisceration.Methods: Of the patients who underwent evisceration under general anesthesia in our hospital, 55 who were able to evaluate pain using a numeral rating scale (NRS) were included. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 used PCA after surgery, and group 2 used PCA preemptively before surgery. We compared the two groups in terms of the NRS pain scores on the day of surgery and 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery, and according to whether additional analgesics were used.Results: The 55 patients included 17 in group 1 and 38 in group 2. The NRS at 3, 5, and 7 hours on the day of surgery tended to be lower in group 2, but not significantly (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &gt; 0.05). The NRS on days 1 and 2 after surgery was significantly lower in group 2 (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.014 and &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.027, respectively), and the NRS on day 3 after surgery was also lower, although not significantly (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.059). Significantly fewer cases required additional analgesics in group 2 compared to group 1 on the day of surgery and 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.001, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001, and &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.008, respectively).Conclusions: Using preemptive systemic PCA in evisceration significantly reduced the postoperative pain, and PCA itself was an effective administration method due to the high rate of pain control without the need for additional analgesics.

Recent progress in alleviating orthodontic discomfort: Mechanism and management-the state of evidence

Orthodontic treatment has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing dental health and rectifying tooth misalignments. Nevertheless, patients experience substantial discomfort and distress. Advancements in orthodontic technology and treatment procedures have led to a decrease in orthodontic discomfort. Orthodontic discomfort refers to the inflammation that occurs due to the obstruction of blood vessels by orthodontic force. This leads to inflammatory responses, which encompass alterations in blood vessels, recruitment of inflammatory and immune cells, and heightened sensitivity of nerves along with the release of chemicals that promote inflammation. The body's inherent analgesic systems ultimately regulate the inflammatory response, thereby diminishing pain. Orthodontic pain signals are transmitted by three-order neurons, beginning with the trigeminal neuron located in the trigeminal ganglia. The signals subsequently arrive at the trigeminal nucleus caudalis located in the medulla oblongata, as well as the ventroposterior nucleus in the thalamus, where the sensation of pain is perceived. The processing of orthodontic pain involves the interplay of emotion, cognition, and memory in many parts of the brain. The structures encompassed in this list are the insular cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, locus coeruleus, and hypothalamus. The inherent analgesic neuronal pathway of the periaqueductal gray and dorsal raphe regions alleviates orthodontic discomfort. Various techniques are employed to manage orthodontic discomfort. These therapies encompass pharmacological, mechanical, behavioral, and low-level laser treatments. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicines (NSAIDs) alleviate pain, but their impact on tooth movement remains uncertain. Additional research is required to establish the effectiveness of alternative modalities. Gene therapy provides a new, practical, and hopeful approach to treating orthodontic pain. This article explores new advancements and techniques that have enhanced the level of comfort experienced by orthodontic patients.

Vagal tone, pain sensitivity and exercise-induced hypoalgesia: The effect of physical activity level.

Vagal activity has analgesic effects that are attributed to exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH). High vagal tone and low pain sensitivity are reported in individuals who routinely exercise yet, their association is unclear. Furthermore, it is unknown if the heightened vagal tone following high physical activity predicts and intensifies EIH. Fifty-one healthy participants (27 low-moderately physically active; 27 females) underwent a resting-state electrocardiogram followed by heart rate variability analysis. Pain measurements, including pressure (PPT) and heat (HPT) pain thresholds, ratings of tonic heat pain (THP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, were conducted pre- and post-exercise on a cycle ergometer. The highly active group demonstrated higher vagal tone compared to the low-moderately active (root mean square of successive differences between R-R intervals: 63.96.92 vs. 34.78 ms, p = 0.018; percentage of successive R-R intervals that exceed 50 ms: 24.41 vs. 11.52%, p = 0.012). Based on repeated-measure ANOVA, the highly active group showed higher PPT at pre-exercise, compared to the low-moderately active group (382 kPa vs. 327 kPa; p = 0.007). Post-exercise, both groups demonstrated EIH, increased HPT (p = 0.013) and decreased THP ratings (p < 0.001). Linear regression revealed that only in the low-moderately active group, higher vagal tone was associated with more efficient pre-exercise CPM and a greater reduction in THP ratings post-exercise (p ≤ 0.01). Highly active individuals demonstrate greater vagal tone and lower pain sensitivity but no greater EIH. Vagal tone moderates pain inhibition efficiency and EIH only in low-moderately active individuals. These findings suggest that physical activity level moderates the vagal-pain association via the endogenous analgesia system. Highly physically active individuals exhibit greater vagal tone and reduced sensitivity to experimental pain, yet they do not benefit more from exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) compared to low-moderately active individuals. Moreover, low-moderately active individuals with greater vagal tone exhibited more efficient endogenous pain inhibition and greater EIH, suggestive of the moderation effect of physical activity level on vagal-pain associations.

Pericapsular Hip Block Guided by Ultrasonography in Elderly People with Hip Fracture in the Emergency Sector: Clinical Trial.

Objectives This study evaluated pain intensity in elderly subjects with hip fractures admitted to the emergency sector and undergoing preoperative pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block. Additionally, the degree of tolerable hip flexion was assessed. Methods A prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial with parallel groups. The control group consisted of elderly subjects with hip fractures undergoing standardized intravenous systemic analgesia. The intervention group consisted of elderly patients with hip fractures undergoing PENG block and standardized systemic analgesia. The groups were evaluated at rest and during movement using the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale. We determined pain intensity and reduction, in addition to the degree of tolerable flexion of the fractured hip. All patient assessments occurred before the medication or block administration and at 45 minutes, 12, 24, and 36 hours postmedication or block. Results Preoperatively and 24 hours after PENG block, elderly subjects with hip fracture showed a significant reduction in pain at rest or movement compared to control patients ( p < 0.05), with 60% of patients assessed at rest demonstrating desirable pain reduction (≥50%) and only 13.3% of the control group achieving the desired pain reduction. During movement, after undergoing PENG block, 40% of subjects demonstrated the desired pain reduction and no patient from the control group. The intervention group also showed a significant improvement in the tolerable hip flexion group ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Preoperative PENG block in elderly subjects with hip fractures admitted to the emergency sector provided a significant reduction in pain compared with the control group.

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided pecto-intercostal fascial block and transversus thoracis muscle plane block for postoperative analgesia in cardiac surgery in adult patients: A randomized study

ABSTRACT Background Insufficient management of postoperative pain is a notable issue encountered by individuals after open-heart operations. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) and transversus thoracis muscle plane (TTB) on the analgesic efficacy in adult patients undergoing open-heart operations and the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods A randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted on a cohort of 90 adult patients with elective open-heart surgery, namely valve replacement, with midline sternotomy. Patients were divided into three groups of similar size. The first group (control group) received conventional systemic analgesia alone, while the second group received bilateral TTB and the third group received bilateral PIFB, using ultra-sound guided technique. Results A significant reduction in NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) values was observed in both the TTB group and the PIFB group as compared to the control group at zero, three and 6-hour postoperative. The PIFB and TTB group exhibited an important delay in the initiation of first rescue analgesia, as well as a reduction in the overall intake of fentanyl for rescue purposes during a twenty-four-hour period. Additionally, the TTB group and the PIFB group demonstrated considerably shorter durations of mechanical ventilation as compared to the control group. Conclusions The utilization of ultrasound TTB and PIFB demonstrated efficacy in providing postoperative analgesia compared to the control group. This was evidenced by the less requirement for additional analgesic medication, reducing postoperative pain scores and a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation.

Minimally invasive interventions on celiac plexus in patients with persistent abdominal pain caused by pancreatic cancer

Background. Chronic abdominal pain is common in 50 % of patients with intra-abdominal malignancies and has a huge impact on quality of their lives. As the number and doses of systemic analgesics increase, so does the frequency of side effects that can further worsen functional status, which is important for this cohort of patients who have a five-year survival rate of only 8 %. The purpose of the study: to assess the efficacy and safety of computed tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis as a method of reducing persistent, severe pain in patients with pancreatic cancer that affects their functional status. Materials and methods. The analysis of the results of 17 interventional procedures on the celiac plexus in 16 participants was conducted, sympatholysis was performed twice in one patient. Inclusion criteria: pancreatic cancer with persistent pharmacoresistant neuropathic abdominal pain for ≥ 3 months, which did not respond to medications, including opioids, anti-inflammatory drugs, and other conservative methods of treatment. Age of patients was 39 to 72 years (mean of 62.6 ± 8.2 years), 10 (62.5 %) research participants were male and 6 (37.5 %) were female. Results. Interventions were successfully performed for all patients on the first attempt. There were no cases of perforations of hollow organs, damage to blood vessels, pleural sinuses, or other structures of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. No neurological complications were recorded, and no one required blood transfusion. All study patients had a significant reduction in pain on the visual analogue scale compared to baseline, both one week after the procedure, from 9.7 ± 0.6 to 4.7 ± 1.4 (P &lt; 0.001), and in six months, from 9.7 ± 0.6 to 4.1 ± 1.4 (P &lt; 0.001). The average Karnofsky Performance Status Scale score compared to the data before the procedure, one week after increased from 64.7 ± 7.9 to 78.2 ± 6.4 (P &lt; 0.001). A significant improvement in functional status was maintained up to three months — 71.2 ± 6.9 (P &lt; 0.001). However, in six months, this indicator was 63.5 ± 6.0 (Р = 0.668), which may be related not only to the intensity of the pain syndrome, but also to other complications of the underlying disease (ascites, cachexia, tumor growth, palliative surgical interventions, etc.). Conclusions. Computed tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis is a safe and effective procedure for patients with abdominal pain caused by inoperable pancreatic cancer. Sympatholysis provides a long-term significant reduction in pain syndrome according to the visual analogue scale after 1, 3, 6 months (Р &lt; 0.001) and increases the functional status of patients according to the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale in 1 (Р &lt; 0.001), 3 months (Р = 0.023). Celiac plexus neurolysis should be considered as part of a multidisciplinary approach to the comprehensive treatment of upper abdominal pain associated with cancer in the early stages of the disease.

Neonatal Outcomes in Labor After Intravenous Remifentanil Analgesia vs. Epidural Analgesia: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background Some evidence indicates that maternal analgesia during labor may have adverse effects on neonates due to exposure to specific drugs or the potential effects of analgesia on the course of labor. We assessed the clinical outcome of term neonates born to mothers who received epidural analgesia (E) or systemic analgesia with remifentanil (R) during labor. Methods Data was collected retrospectively over one year. We have evaluated the medical records of 247 full-term neonates; 208 were born to mothers who received E and 39 to mothers who received R. Data on Apgar scores and neonatal complications(perinatal asphyxia, respiratory distress, infection, hyperbilirubinemia, and birth injuries), and average hospital stay were collected. Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis were used where appropriate. Results The values of the mean Apgar scores between E and R at 1 and 5 minutes were similar (8.83 vs. 8.97,p= 0.252; 9.81 vs. 9.87,p= 0.762, respectively). The average length of neonatal hospitalization did not differ between groups (4.19 vs. 4;p= 0.557). The percentages of neonates with any complication were similar between groups (28.3% vs. 32.5%,p= 0.598). Neonates born by cesarean delivery (CD) had significantly worse outcomes than those born vaginally (p= 0.008, OR 2.8, 95% CI [1.30, 6.17]). Conclusion We did not find a statistically significant difference in mean Apgar scores and neonatal complications between neonates who received epidural vs. remifentanil analgesia. An increased rate of complications in neonates born via CD was found. Future studies should have a larger sample size and be powered to detect associations in these findings.