The article deals with language communication and discusses the problem of reception, as well as traditional methods of teaching foreign languages. What is the term language communication? In fact, it is a single system consisting of two types of communication. This includes both oral and written speech. The importance of the question of the relationship between sound language and writing is compounded by the fact that existing methodological systems interpret it in a diametrically opposite way. Classical linguistics of the 19th century, as well as the traditional methods of teaching foreign languages, developed and concentrated their attention on the study of dead written languages: Latin, ancient Greek and some others. The complete disregard for living sound languages as "degenerated descendants" of the majestic and harmonious writing systems of ancient languages was characteristic. When mastering oral speech and writing, emphasis should be placed on the specifics of these forms of communication both in communication techniques and in sign systems. The first of these aspects should be adequately reflected in the system of communicative exercises — oral for teaching sound language, exercises in reading and writing — for teaching the language of writing. The second aspect should form the basis for the selection of language material to be mastered in oral speech and writing. The requirements just formulated can be satisfied only if specialized textbooks of oral speech and reading-writing are created, and the textbook of oral speech for any purpose must be sound. Special attention is paid to the importance of the correlation between sound language and writing, which is treated differently in the existing methodological systems. Classical linguistics of the nineteenth century and traditional methods of foreign language teaching become the object of study, revealing the development of their approaches to language communication. Questions about the relationship between spoken and written language are raised, warning against diametrically opposed interpretations of this relationship in existing methodologies.