Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Research Articles

Sex-Related Differences in Dispensation of Rheumatic Medications in Older Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis: A Population-Based Study.

The aim of our study was to compare dispensation of rheumatic medications between older male and female patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This retrospective cohort study was performed using health administrative data from Ontario, Canada (years 2010-2017), on patients with incident RA and PsA, who were aged ≥ 66 years at the time of diagnosis. Yearly dispensation of rheumatic drugs was compared between older male and female patients for 3 years after diagnosis using multivariable regression models, after adjusting for confounders. The groups of drugs included in the analysis were disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) classified as conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and advanced therapy (biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and oral corticosteroids. Results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. We analyzed 13,613 patients (64% female) with RA and 1116 patients (57% female) with PsA. Female patients with RA were more likely to receive opioids (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.22-1.58 to OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.32-1.72) and NSAIDs (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25 to OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.30). Dispensation of DMARDs showed no sex difference in either group. Subgroup analyses showed more intense use of advanced therapy in the RA cohort and of csDMARDs in the PsA cohort when patient and physician sex was concordant. This study did not identify any sex difference in the use of DMARDs among older patients with RA and PsA. The reasons for the higher use of opioids and NSAIDs among female patients with RA warrant further research.

The RESIST Study: Examining Cognitive Change in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Being Treated with a TNF-Inhibitor Compared to a Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug.

Evidence suggests that TNF inhibitors (TNFi) used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may protect against Alzheimer's disease progression by reducing inflammation. To investigate whether RA patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) being treated with a TNFi show slower cognitive decline than those being treated with a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD). 251 participants with RA and MCI taking either a csDMARD (N = 157) or a TNFi (N = 94) completed cognitive assessments at baseline and 6-month intervals for 18 months. It was hypothesized that those taking TNFis would show less decline on the primary outcome of Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall (FCSRT-IR) and the secondary outcome of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). No significant changes in FCSRT-IR scores were observed in either treatment group. There was no significant difference in FCSRT-IR between treatment groups at 18 months after adjusting for baseline (mean difference = 0.5, 95% CI = -1.3, 2.3). There was also no difference in MoCA score (mean difference = 0.4, 95% CI = -0.4, 1.3). There was no cognitive decline in participants with MCI being treated with TNFis and csDMARDs, raising the possibility both classes of drug may be protective. Future studies should consider whether controlling inflammatory diseases using any approach is more important than a specific therapeutic intervention.

OA20 Serious infections hospital admissions and mortality in patients with early inflammatory arthritis: results from the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit

Abstract Background/Aims To identify the risk of serious infections (SI) according to initial treatment strategy, using conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) and corticosteroids, in patients recruited to the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA). Methods An observational cohort study design was used. The population included adults in England with a new onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria, between April 2018-March 2021. Outcomes studied were SI, defined by infections requiring hospitalisation (primary admission diagnosis/nosocomial acquisition) or death (SI stated on death certificate), identified using NHS Digital linkage. Patients' characteristics were tabulated by treatment strategies. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using single failure Cox proportional-hazards models, with confounders-adjusted models (age, gender, smoking status, comorbidities, social deprivation) and fully-adjusted models including disease factors (seropositivity, DAS28). Individuals were considered at risk from the date of RA diagnosis, and censored at SI event, death, or March 2021 (whichever was earliest). Results 20,060 patients with RA were included. Initial DMARD therapy was known for 19,572 patients, of whom 11,966 were on methotrexate/MTX based strategies (mono or combo), 5,059 on csDMARD combination strategies (other than MTX) and 2,547 on no DMARD strategy. 15,319 patients were on corticosteroids at baseline. Mean age 59.5 years (+/-15); 63% female; smoking status (20% current; 30% ex-smokers); comorbidities (21% hypertension; 10% diabetes; and 12% lung disease). Rheumatoid Factor/CCP antibodies were positive in 68%. At presentation, median disease scores were 5.1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.0-5.9) for DAS28, 1.1 (IQR: 0.6-1.7) for health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and 24 (IQR: 16.0-33.0) for musculoskeletal health questionnaire (MSKHQ).There were 519 SI admissions and 17 SI deaths, corresponding to incidence rates per 100 person-years for admissions: 3.19 (95% CI: 2.93-3.48) and deaths: 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06-0.16). In fully-adjusted models, increasing age predicted both SI admissions and deaths. Being a smoker, having a comorbidity, higher disease activity (DAS28), symptom burden (MSKHQ) and disability (HAQ) at presentation associated with more SI admissions. For each 1 unit increase in DAS28, the risk of SI increased by 8% (HR 1.08 [95% CI:1.01-1.16]). Seropositivity did not associate with SI. MTX-based strategies 0.75 (95% CI:0.62-0.91) and csDMARD combination therapy 0.70 (95% CI:0.53-0.94) associated with fewer SI admissions compared to no DMARD. In unadjusted models, corticosteroid associated with more SI admissions 1.29 (95% CI:1.10 -1.62); however, in fully-adjusted models this association was no longer statistically significant. csDMARD strategies did not associated with SI deaths in any of the models. Conclusion Patient and disease factors at diagnosis appear to be important predictors of admissions and mortality for serious infections. Infection risk appears to be greatest in those with higher RA disease activity. An important limitation is that NEIAA does not capture data on treatment changes over time and steroid use beyond baseline. Disclosure M. Adas: None. K. Bechman: None. M. Russell: Honoraria; Lilly and Menarini. Other; upport for attending conferences from Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, and UCB, and advisory board fees from Biogen.. I. Karafotias: None. D. Nagra: None. S. Patel: None. S. Gallagher: None. E. Price: None. M. Garton: None. A. Rutherford: None. A. Cope: None. S. Norton: None. J. Galloway: Honoraria; from Abbvie, Biovitrum, Bristol Myers Squib (BMS), Celgene, Chugai, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, and UCB.

E066 Baseline characteristics of patients initiating ixekizumab, secukinumab or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor by country in the 24-month Prospective Psoriatic Arthritis Observational Study of Persistence of Treatment - PRO-SPIRIT

Abstract Background/Aims The Psoriatic Arthritis Observational Study of Persistence of Treatment (PRO-SPIRIT) is the first large-sample, multinational, prospective, observational study to provide real-world evidence for ixekizumab (IXE) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who start a new biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD), with a primary end point of persistence at 24 months. Aims: To describe baseline characteristics of PRO-SPIRIT patients initiating or switching to IXE, secukinumab (SEC) or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in Canada (CA), France (FR), Germany (DE), Italy (IT), Spain (ES) and the United Kingdom (UK). Methods PRO-SPIRIT enrolled adults diagnosed with PsA (≥6 months) between December 2019 and June 2022 to be initiated or switched to a new b/tsDMARD, locally approved for the management of PsA. Baseline characteristics, including patient demographics, therapy and disease activity measures, are described here by country for patients initiating IXE, SEC (both IL-17A inhibitors) or a TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab or biosimilar) only. Results This analysis included 943 patients (Table 1). The overall proportion of patients with BMI ≥30 mg/kg2 was highest in CA (67.2%) and lowest in IT (24.5%); across countries, higher proportions of patients initiating an IL-17A vs a TNFi had BMI ≥30 mg/kg2 (except IXE groups in IT, ES and UK). Higher proportions of patients initiating an IL-17A vs a TNFi were diagnosed with PsA ≥3 years before baseline (except SEC groups in DE and ES). The highest proportions of b/tsDMARD-naïve patients were observed in the TNFi groups in all countries (range 46.2% [CA] to 81.9% [UK]). Patients in the IL-17A groups were more likely to be on monotherapy than patients in the TNFi groups (except in FR). There were no clear trends in baseline disease activity for patients initiating IL-17As or TNFis, although country-specific differences were observed. Conclusion The PRO-SPIRIT baseline characteristics described offer important insights into country-specific patient demographics and treatment patterns when initiating or switching to a new b/tsDMARD in a real-world setting. Between-country variations observed in PRO-SPIRIT baseline characteristics may be due to differences in healthcare systems and/or the evolution of treatment options for patients with PsA in each country. Disclosure N. Gullick: Consultancies; AbbVie,Novartis, UCB. Honoraria; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, UCB. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis. M. Sheesh: Corporate appointments; Eli Lilly and Company. Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. C. Laedermann: Corporate appointments; Eli Lilly and Company. Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Ngantcha: Corporate appointments; Eli Lilly and Company. Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. B. Gittens: Corporate appointments; Eli Lilly and Company. K. Ng: Corporate appointments; Eli Lilly and Company. Shareholder/stock ownership; Eli Lilly and Company. W. Tillett: Consultancies; Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; Janssen, UCB, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company. J. Morel: Consultancies; Pfizer, AbbVie, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Galapagos, GSK. Member of speakers’ bureau; Biogen, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squib, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Sanofi, MSD, Mylan, Fresenius Kabi, Roche, Union Chimique Belge, Janssen, Medac, Nordic Pharma. Grants/research support; Fresenius Kabi. E. Lubrano: Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie, Janssen Cilag, Lilly, UCB, Pfizer, Novartis. R. Alten: Consultancies; AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UC. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB. L. Kristensen: Consultancies; Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, UCB, Gilead, Biogen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen. Member of speakers’ bureau; Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, UCB, Gilead, Biogen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen. Grants/research support; Pfizer, Abb- Vie, UCB, Gilead, Biogen, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen. V. Chandran: Consultancies; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Janssen. Grants/research support; AbbVie. A. Martinez-Ferrer: Grants/research support; Eli Lilly and Company. B. Kirkham: Consultancies; Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos, Novartis. Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis.

P117 Efficacy of filgotinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Week 156 results from a long-term extension study

Abstract Background/Aims In the treatment of RA, JAK inhibitors are a valuable option to meet remission or low disease activity (LDA) treatment targets following an inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). FIL is a JAK1 preferential inhibitor available in two doses for the treatment of moderate to severe RA. Objectives: To evaluate long-term efficacy of two doses of FIL in clinically relevant pt populations. Methods In this interim analysis, efficacy (non-responder imputation) of FIL 200 mg (FIL200) and 100 mg (FIL100) was assessed from LTE baseline (BL) to W156 in pts with an IR to methotrexate (MTX-IR) and biologics (bDMARD-IR), enrolled from FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) and 2 (NCT02873936) parent studies (PS), respectively, receiving ≥1 FIL dose in FINCH 4 (NCT03025308). Results Study design, BL characteristics and W48 outcomes for MTX-IR1 and bDMARD-IR2 pts were reported previously. For MTX-IR and bDMARD-IR pts who received FIL200 or FIL100 in the PS, W156 remission rates using Boolean 1.0 criteria were 20.5% and 15.8%, and 18.2% and 8.9%, respectively. Adopting the Boolean 2.0 criteria slightly increased remission rates for FIL200 and FIL100 at W156: +4.2% and +4.9% for MTX-IR pts, and +1.5% and +2.4% for bDMARD-IR pts, respectively. For pts rerandomized to FIL on entering the LTE, Boolean 2.0 criteria also increased remission rates vs Boolean 1.0. Both MTX-IR and bDMARD-IR pts maintained long-term Boolean remission through W156 with FIL200 and FIL100, irrespective of prior FIL. Results for Disease Activity Score 28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) <2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤2.8, and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤3.3, and mean change from PS BL in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and pain are shown (Table). Similar trends in efficacy were seen for LDA and ACR response criteria. Conclusion In FINCH 4, both FIL200 and FIL100 showed sustained efficacy up to W156 in clinically relevant pt populations. Boolean 2.0 criteria classified more pts in remission, in line with the range reported in the validation study. Disclosure M.H. Buch: Consultancies; AbbVie, CESAS Medical, Galapagos, Gilead, and Pfizer (all paid to host institution). Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie (paid to host institution). Grants/research support; Gilead (paid to host institution). D. Aletaha: Consultancies; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi. R. Caporali: Consultancies; AbbVie, Fresenius, Galapagos, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Fresenius, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. B. Combe: Consultancies; AbbVie, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Roche-Chugai. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai. H. Schulze-Koops: Consultancies; AbbVie, Galapagos, Lilly, and Pfizer. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Galapagos, Lilly, and Pfizer. J. Gottenberg: Consultancies; AbbVie, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer. Grants/research support; BMS and Pfizer. Y. Tanaka: Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Pfizer. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Takeda. R. Blanco: Consultancies; AstraZeneca, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. Grants/research support; AbbVie and Roche. T. Takeuchi: Consultancies; AbbVie GK, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen Pharm K.K., Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Pfizer Japan Inc. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie GK, AYUMI, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen Pharm K.K., Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Pfizer Japan Inc., and Sanofi K.K. Grants/research support; AbbVie GK, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, AYUMI, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Nippon Kayaku, and UCB Japan. E. V. Ekoka Omoruyi: Consultancies; Galapagos and Janssen. Shareholder/stock ownership; UCB. K. Van Beneden: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos. Other; Employee of Galapagos. V. Rajendran: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos. Other; Employee of Galapagos. C. Watson: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos. Other; Employee of Galapagos. F. De Leonardis: Other; Employee of Galapagos. P. Emery: Consultancies; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Samsung. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Samsung. Grants/research support; AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Samsung.

E075 Sacroiliitis potentially induced by isotretinoin: two case reports

Abstract Background/Aims Isotretinoin is a potent retinoid medication widely used to treat severe acne. Isotretinoin’s adverse effects range from well-documented dermatological side effects like dry skin to less common systemic manifestations. Sacroiliitis can arise from rheumatic and nonrheumatic causes. There has been limited attention in the literature to the rare occurrence of sacroiliitis as an adverse effect of isotretinoin. The precise mechanisms remain poorly understood, but the emergence of case reports suggests a potential link in immunomodulation through the alteration of cytokine balance and degradation of synovial membranes in joints. We present two patients with severe acne history who developed bilateral sacroiliitis within several weeks after starting isotretinoin Methods Case 1: A 19 year old male, started on 20 mg daily isotretinoin for acne vulgaris, experienced severe hip and lower back pain after one month, impacting his mobility. On examination, he displayed painful hip movements. Lumbar flexion was restricted and painful, with a 2 cm measurement on the Schober’s test. Medical investigation showed an elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR): 66mm/h, and C-reactive protein (CRP): 81 mg/l. HLA B27 was negative. X-ray radiography of the sacroiliac joint was normal, but the MRI examination showed the presence of bilateral sacroiliitis. Case 2: A 34 year old female received a six-months isotretinoin treatment for severe acne, with doses ranging from 20-40 mg daily. Then, in 2018, after a six-year gap, she received another isotretinoin course at 30 mg daily. Four months later, she began to experience gradual, intermittent lower back pain associated with 30 minutes of early morning stiffness. Her vital signs were stable, but she exhibited restricted and painful lumbar flexion. Her investigations revealed normal ESR and CRP. HLA B27 was negative. Her sacroiliac joint X-ray showed normal results, but her MRI indicated bilateral active sacroiliitis. Results Following the discontinuation of isotretinoin in both cases, NSAIDs were administered, which effectively relieved the pain. Our management of isotretinoin-induced sacroiliitis follows guidelines adapted from the ASAS-EULAR algorithm for axial spondyloarthritis. The algorithm entails an initial treatment with NSAIDs if no contraindications and to be titrated up to the maximum effective dose before considering biological/ targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Conclusion The two cases highlight the rare but noteworthy association between isotretinoin therapy and sacroiliitis. In patients presenting with unexplained musculoskeletal symptoms during isotretinoin treatment at any point, clinicians should raise suspicions on the adverse effects of medication. Further research is needed to elucidate the immunomodulatory pathways involved in this association. Disclosure H. Almansoori: None. N. Alnuaimi: None. S. Alhosani: None. M. Alshehhi: None. S.A. Al Nokhatha: None.

P122 Secular trends in prescription of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: Experience from a UK regional centre (2016-2022)

Abstract Background/Aims In the past two decades, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have substantially transformed the treatment landscape for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). With the emergence of new molecules, the introduction of cost-effective biosimilars, and the impact of the COVID pandemic, the treatment preferences might have shifted over time. We aim to explore the evolving trends in the prescription of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in RA patients whose disease was refractory to conventional DMARDs. Methods A biologic registry was set up sourcing data from pharmacy and departmental records. Data of RA patients who were commenced on biologics or targeted synthetic DMARDs between January 2016 and December 2022 are presented descriptively without formal statistical assessments. Line plots depict prescription trends over the years. Data visualization done using R studio (v 2023.06). Results We have 1504 out of the 2345 patients in our biologic registry with RA; 827 of these patients commenced the treatment in the 7-year study period. Over the years, biosimilars are increasingly being preferred as the first-line agents. If a biosimilar for a biologic drug was available, all prescriptions were for the biosimilar in 2022. There was a significant drop (43.7%) in biologic prescriptions during the pandemic in 2020 compared to the previous year. However, by the next year, prescriptions rebounded to 91% of their pre-pandemic levels. TNF inhibitors and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors were the most common treatments initiated. There was a steady increase in the prescription of JAK inhibitors since their introduction in 2017. During the pandemic, JAK inhibitors were the most preferred agents for RA. However, a decline in their prescriptions was noted in 2022, down 36% from the previous year, possibly due to emerging concerns about their cardiovascular safety. While there was reduction in prescription of all biologics during pandemic, anti B cell therapy had the steepest decline (74.1% reduction in 2020 compared to previous year). This may be due to the increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and impaired response to the vaccine with Rituximab. This trend is gradually reversing. Rates of prescription of abatacept and anti-IL6 agents remained fairly stable across the seven years. Conclusion Significant fluctuations are evident in the trend of prescription of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a regional centre in UK. We conclude that availability of biosimilars, safety data on JAK inhibitors and impact of the COVID pandemic had influenced the prescription trends. Disclosure H. Muhammed: None. H. Osborn: None. K. Hughes: None. A. Yau: None. G. Hirsch: None. S. Raizada: None. T. Sheeran: None. S. Venkatachalam: None.

Comparative efficacy of five approved Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The European League of Rheumatology(EULAR)guidelines recommend Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are insensitive or under-responsive to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). But there was no recommendation for which one was preferred in five currently approved JAK inhibitors. The objective of this network meta-analysis study was to evaluate the efficacy of five JAK inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy or combined with csDMARD in the treatment of active RA were searched in database of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, up to December 2023. The control group included placebo or csDMARD. Outcome indicators included American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), ACR50, ACR70 and the percentage of patients achieving 28-joint disease activity score using C-reactive protein (DAS28(CRP))<2.6at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The statistical analysis was performed by Stata14 and RevMan5.4. Data processing, network evidence plots, surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking, league plots and funnel plots were generated. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) as effect sizes to analyze the statistics. This study included thirty-six RCTs with 16,713 patients. All JAK inhibitors were more effective than placebo in ACR20 (RRs ranging between 1.74 and 3.08), ACR50 (RRs ranging between 2.02 and 7.47), ACR70 (RRs ranging between 2.68 and 18.13), DAS28(CRP) < 2.6 (RRs ranging between 2.70 and 7.09) at 12 weeks. Upadacitinib 30mg and upadacitinib 15mg showed relatively good efficacy according to their relative SUCRA ranking. All JAK inhibitors were more effective than csDMARD or placebo in ACR20 (RRs ranging between 1.16 and 1.86), ACR50 (RRs ranging between 1.69 and 2.84), ACR70 (RRs ranging between 1.50 and 4.47), DAS28(CRP) < 2.6 (RRs ranging between 2.28 and 7.56) at 24 weeks. Upadacitinib 15mg + csDMARD and baricitinib 4mg + csDMARD showed relatively good efficacy according to their relative SUCRA ranking. The safety analysis results such as serious infection, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and venous thromboembolic events (VTE) showed no statistical difference. This NMA study indicated that all JAK inhibitors performed better than placebo. Based on the results of this study, upadacitinib 30mg, upadacitinib 15mg, upadacitinib 15mg + csDMARD and baricitinib 4mg + csDMARD were recommended treatment options with relatively good efficacy and safety. However, attention should be paid to monitoring the occurrence of adverse events in high-risk RA patients with medication. Combination therapy with csDMARD might be more suitable for the maintenance of long-term efficacy. However, in clinical practice, it is still necessary to select the appropriate therapeutic regimen based on the actual clinical situation.

P108 Filgotinib for Rheumatoid Arthritis: an observational cohort to assess clinical effectiveness in a single centre

Abstract Background/Aims Filgotinib, a Janus-kinase (JAK) 1 preferential inhibitor, was approved for use in the UK in moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 2021, as monotherapy or in combination with Methotrexate. Evidence of real-world effectiveness is currently limited. Methods Patients prescribed Filgotinib between December 2021 and August 2022 in NHS Lothian were identified from pharmacy registration data. All underwent clinical efficacy assessment at three months. Electronic patient records (EPR) were reviewed to record baseline data including previous and current treatments. Duration of Filgotinib treatment was recorded, and discontinuation reason if applicable. DAS-28 scores within six months prior to starting Filgotinib were recorded, along with available subsequent scores. Pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD), venous thromboembolism (VTE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and malignancy were recorded, along with incident events during treatment. Results 145 patients were prescribed Filgotinib; 106 (73.1%) females and 39 (26.9%) males, with median age 64 years. Median treatment duration was 447 days. 35 (24.1%) were treated with the reduced 100mg dose. 81 (55.9%) received conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) alongside Filgotinib. 41 (28.3%) patients discontinued treatment: 10 (6.9%) due to loss of effect; 16 (11.0%) due to lack of efficacy; six (4.1%) experienced side effects leading to cessation; five (3.4%) stopped for alternative reasons; one (0.7%) experienced a severe allergic drug reaction; three (2.1%) developed lung cancer and treatment was stopped in each case. 12 (8.3%) patients had ILD prior to treatment. 10 (6.9%) had prior major cardiovascular events, eight (5.5%) had previously treated malignancy, and six (4.1%) had previous VTE. During treatment, 1 (0.7%) patient developed ILD and two (1.4%) developed VTE. There were three (2.1%) new malignancies, all lung cancer. No new MACE occurred. 120 (82.8%) patients were previously treated with biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs. 59 (40.7%) had failed multiple biologic DMARDs of different classes. 19 (13.1%) switched to Filgotinib from another JAK inhibitor. Pre-treatment DAS-28 scores were recorded in 55 (37.9%) patients with mean 5.1, and during treatment in 44 patients (30.3%) with mean 3.5. 17 (11.7%) patients had DAS-28 recorded both before and during treatment, with pre-treatment mean 5.0 and subsequent mean 2.9. Of these, 10 (58.8%) were classified as a good response by EULAR disease activity criteria, and four (23.5%) as a moderate response. Three (17.6%) were non-responders. Conclusion Our cohort includes 40.7% difficult-to-treat RA. Drug survival as a clinical efficacy surrogate was 71.7% at median duration 447 days, demonstrating patient acceptability and clinical effectiveness. Our service is poor at DAS-28 recording in the EPR, which may partly reflect imaging use at response assessment. Since this cohort was established, the European Medicines Agency has issued guidance advising caution using JAK inhibitors in high-risk groups to minimise the chance of serious side effects. Disclosure C.D. Box: None. S. Ramsay: None. N.D. McKay: Other; N.D.M. has received funding for conference registrations from Abbvie, UCB and Novartis, fees for lecturing from Gilead, and has taken part in advisory board meetings for UCB and Gilead.

Optimising patient outcomes: temporal trends in remission rates of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Australian OPAL dataset between 2009 and 2022.

To describe the trends in remission rates among RA patients in the OPAL dataset, spanning from 2009 to 2022, and provide insights into the effectiveness of evolving RA management approaches in real-world clinical settings. Patients with a physician diagnosis of RA and at least 3 visits between 1 January 2009 and December 2022 were identified in the OPAL dataset, an aggregated collection of data extracted from the electronic medical records of patients managed by 117 Australian rheumatologists. Demographics, disease history, prescribed medications and proportions of patients in Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28CRP)) categories (remission, low disease activity (LDA), moderate disease activity (MDA) and high disease activity (HDA)) were described. A large population (n = 48,388) of eligible patients with RA were identified in the OPAL dataset. A consistent and substantial improvement in DAS28CRP remission rates were found in (i) all patients, (ii) patients managed on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) and (iii) patients treated with biological or targeted synthetic (b/ts)DMARD therapy, increasing from approximately 50% in 2009 to over 70% by 2022. The increase in DAS28CRP remission was accompanied by reduced proportions of patients in MDA and HDA states. This study highlights a consistent improvement in disease activity and rising remission rates among Australian RA patients within the OPAL dataset, offering the potential for enhanced patient outcomes and reduced disease burden.

Long-term effects of abatacept on atherosclerosis and arthritis in older vs. younger patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 3-year results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study

BackgroundWe aimed to reveal the effect of abatacept (ABT) on atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, 3-year efficacy for arthritis, and safety in a population of older vs. younger patients.MethodsIn this open-label, prospective, observational study, patients were stratified into four groups: younger (20–64 years old) and older (≥ 65 years) patients taking ABT (AY and AO) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (CY and CO). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in mean intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery, IMT max (bulbus, bifurcation, and internal and common carotid artery), and plaque score at Week 156. Disease activity, retention rate, and adverse effects were also evaluated.ResultsThe ABT group (AY + AO) tended to have smaller increases in mean IMT, max IMT, and plaque score than the csDMARD group (CY + CO) at Week 156, although the differences between groups were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed significantly lower increases in plaque score with ABT than with csDMARDs, only when considering disease activity at 156 weeks (p = 0.0303). Proportions of patients with good or good/moderate European League Against Rheumatism response were higher in the ABT group, without significant difference between older and younger patients. No significant differences were observed in ABT retention rates between older and younger patients. Serious adverse effects, especially infection, tended to be more frequent with ABT than with csDMARDs, although no significant differences were found.ConclusionsABT may decelerate atherosclerosis progression and may be useful for patients with high risk of cardiovascular disease, such as older patients.Trial registration number:UMIN000014913.

Upadacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Efficacy and Safety Through 5 Years (SELECT-NEXT).

To report 5-year efficacy and safety of upadacitinib (UPA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the phase III long-term extension (LTE) of SELECT-NEXT. Patients on stable conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were randomized to UPA 15 mg once daily (QD), UPA 30 mg QD, or placebo for 12 weeks. Following this, placebo-randomized patients were switched to UPA 15 mg QD or UPA 30 mg QD in the LTE; UPA-randomized patients continued their original dose. Blinding remained until dose switching from UPA 30 mg QD to UPA 15 mg QD because of approval of UPA 15 mg QD; the earliest switch occurred at week 168. Efficacy (as observed) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are reported through 5 years. Overall, 611 (92%) randomized patients entered the LTE; 271 (44%) discontinued the study drug by 5 years, primarily because of adverse events (16%). Clinical outcomes improved or were maintained at 5 years; 51% and 43% of patients achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission and 75% and 66% achieved Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on C-reactive protein < 2.6 among those initially randomized to UPA 15 mg QD and UPA 30 mg QD, respectively. Proportions of patients achieving ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria responses increased from week 60 through 5 years. Results were similar regardless of initial randomization to UPA or placebo. TEAEs, including TEAEs of special interest, were consistent with earlier analyses and other SELECT studies. Malignancies (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer), major adverse cardiovascular events, and venous thromboembolic events were reported infrequently. No new safety signals were observed. The 5-year benefit-risk profile for UPA in RA remains favorable. (SELECT-NEXT; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02675426).

Cost of treating rheumatoid arthritis in the primary care public health system in Ireland: A time-driven activity-based cost analysis

BackgroundChronic diseases are at epidemic proportions and continuing to increase in both incidence and prevalence globally. Therefore, there is a growing need to assess and improve on the value currently provided within chronic care pathways. Examining the costs associated with care pathways is a critical part of assessing this value in order to better understand and introduce potential cost-saving interventions. ObjectivesExamining one such chronic disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), this study aimed to assess the cost associated with RA in primary care within the Health Service Executive (HSE) in Ireland. MethodsFollowing mapping of the care pathway, patient vignettes based on exemplar RA patient types were used to conduct semi-structed interviews with every member (N = 21) of the primary care RA pathway. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) was then used to calculate the overall cost of each patient (vignette) type. ResultsRA is an expensive condition regardless of disease stage. However, newly diagnosed patients as well as those with advanced disease in need of surgical interventions demonstrated the highest costs in terms of primary care personnel use. Additionally, patients prescribed Biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) cost significantly more than those on Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) regardless of disease stage or personnel resource use. ConclusionRA and a subset of RA patients that exert the highest healthcare costs are growing in prevalence. Therefore, this study contributes by assessing the costs associated with RA in HSE primary care that can facilitate better understanding the current value being provided and improve upon the current care pathway to cut future costs.

Effects of tapering conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to drug-free remission versus stable treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (ARCTIC REWIND): 3-year results from an open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial

Tapering of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to drug-free remission is an attractive treatment goal for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, although long-term effects of tapering and withdrawal remain unclear. We compared 3-year risks of flare between three conventional synthetic DMARD treatment strategies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission. In this open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-80 years with rheumatoid arthritis who had been in sustained remission for at least 1 year on stable conventional synthetic DMARD therapy. Patients from ten hospitals in Norway were randomly assigned (2:1:1) with centre stratification to receive stable conventional synthetic DMARDs, half-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs, or half-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs for 1 year followed by withdrawal of all conventional synthetic DMARDs. The primary endpoint of this part of the study was disease flare over 3 years, analysed as flare-free survival and risk difference in the per-protocol population with a non-inferiority margin of 20%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01881308) and is completed. Between June 17, 2013, and June 18, 2018, 160 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive stable-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs (n=80), half-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs (n=42), or half-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs tapering to withdrawal (n=38). Four patients did not receive the intervention and 156 patients received the allocated treatment strategy. One patient was excluded due to major protocol violation and 155 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. 104 (67%) of 156 patients were women and 52 (33%) were men. 139 patients completed 3-years follow-up without major protocol violation; 68 (87%) of 78 patients in the stable-dose group, 36 (88%) of 41 patients in the half-dose group and 35 (95%) of 37 patients in the half-dose tapering to withdrawal group. During the 3-year study period, 80% (95% CI 69-88%) were flare-free in the stable-dose group, compared with 57% (41-71%) in the half-dose group and 38% (22-53%) in the half-dose tapering to withdrawal group. Compared with stable-dose conventional synthetic DMARDs, the risk difference of flare was 23% (95% CI 6-41%, p=0·010) in the half-dose group and 40% (22-58%, p<0·0001) in the half-dose tapering to withdrawal group, non-inferiority was therefore not shown. Adverse events were reported in 65 (83%) of 78 patients in the stable-dose group, 36 (90%) of 40 patients in the half-dose group, and 36 (97%) of 37 patients in the half-dose tapering to withdrawal group. One death occurred in the stable-dose conventional synthetic DMARD group (sudden death considered unlikely related to the study medication). Two conventional synthetic DMARD tapering strategies were associated with significantly lower rates of flare-free survival compared with stable conventional synthetic DMARD treatment, and the data do not support non-inferiority. However, drug-free remission was achiveable for a significant subgroup of patients. This trial provides information on risk and benefits of different treatment strategies important for shared decision making. Research Council of Norway and South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.

Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis-Related Enthesitis and Persistence on Tofacitinib Under Real-World Conditions.

Information on the persistence of tofacitinib (TOF) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is scarce in real-world conditions. Our objective was to analyze the persistence and safety of TOF under these conditions. This was a single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study of all patients with PsA who received at least 1 dose of TOF. The main focus was on adverse events (AEs) and drug survival. Drug survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and persistence explanatory factors by multivariate Cox regression models. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to measure association. Seventy-two patients were included, 54 women and 18 men, mean age 51.9 (SD 11.1) years, mean disease duration of 10.4 (SD 6.99) years. TOF was ≥ third line of therapy in > 70% of cases. The median survival was 13.0 (IQR 5.3-29.0) months. One-year retention rate was 52.7% (95% CI 42.4-65.6). TOF survival was not influenced by sex, disease duration, comorbidities, or line of treatment. Younger patients (HR 0.96, P = 0.01) and those with enthesitis (HR 0.37, P = 0.03) showed lower odds of drug discontinuation. The overall rate of AEs was 52.9 (95% CI 38.5-70.6)/100 person-years. Most AEs occurred during the first 6 months of exposure. In this real-world study, TOF showed a reasonably good retention rate in a PsA population that was mostly refractory to biologic and oral targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. There were no new causes for concern regarding safety. Patients with refractory PsA and enthesitis might be a specific target population for this drug.

Management of pregnancy in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: maternal disease course, gestational and neonatal outcomes and use of medications in the prospectiveItalian P-RHEUM.it study

ObjectivesTo investigate pregnancy outcomes in women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) in the Italian prospective cohort study P-RHEUM.it.MethodsPregnant women with different ARD were enrolled for up to 20 gestational weeks...

Macrophage re-programming by JAK inhibitors relies on MAFB

Monocyte-derived macrophages play a key pathogenic role in inflammatory diseases. In the case of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the presence of specific synovial tissue-infiltrating macrophage subsets is associated with either active disease or inflammation resolution. JAK inhibitors (JAKi) are the first targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARD) approved for treatment of RA with comparable efficacy to biologics. However, the effects of JAKi on macrophage specification and differentiation are currently unknown. We have analyzed the transcriptional and functional effects of JAKi on human peripheral blood monocyte subsets from RA patients and on the differentiation of monocyte-derived macrophages promoted by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), a factor that drives the development and pathogenesis of RA. We now report that JAKi Upadacitinib restores the balance of peripheral blood monocyte subsets in RA patients and skewed macrophages towards the acquisition of an anti-inflammatory transcriptional and functional profile in a dose-dependent manner. Upadacitinib-treated macrophages showed a strong positive enrichment of the genes that define synovial macrophages associated to homeostasis/inflammation resolution. Specifically, Upadacitinib-treated macrophages exhibited significantly elevated expression of MAFB and MAFB-regulated genes, elevated inhibitory phosphorylation of GSK3β, and higher phagocytic activity and showed an anti-inflammatory cytokine profile upon activation by pathogenic stimuli. These outcomes were also shared by macrophages exposed to other JAKi (baricitinib, tofacitinib), but not in the presence of the TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib. As a whole, our results indicate that JAKi promote macrophage re-programming towards the acquisition of a more anti-inflammatory/pro-resolution profile, an effect that correlates with the ability of JAKi to enhance MAFB expression.

Evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic delay in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis

Objective. A monocentric cross-sectional study recruiting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients residing in the Lazio region, Italy, to assess factors related to diagnostic delay and treatment accessibility. Methods. Clinical/serological data, including the time between symptom onset, diagnosis, and the beginning of treatment, were collected. Residence, referral to a rheumatologic center, physician who made the diagnosis, and previous misdiagnosis were also evaluated. Results. A higher diagnostic delay (p=0.003), and time between symptom onset and the start of I-line therapy (p=0.006) were observed in PsA compared to RA. A delayed start of II-line therapy was observed in RA compared to PsA (p=0.0007). Higher diagnostic delay (p=0.02), and time between symptom onset and the start of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (p=0.02) were observed among residents of small-medium cities for both groups. Patients who have been diagnosed by another physician rather than a rheumatologist had a longer diagnostic delay (p=0.034) and a delayed start of I-line therapy (p=0.019). Patients who received a different previous diagnosis experienced greater diagnostic delay (p=0.03 and p=0.003) and time of start of csDMARDs (p=0.05 and p=0.01) compared with those receiving RA or PsA as the first diagnosis. PsA had a delay in starting targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (p=0.0004) compared to RA. Seronegative RA had delayed diagnosis (p=0.02) and beginning of therapies (p=0.03; p=0.04) compared to seropositive ones. Conclusions. According to our results, greater diagnostic delay was found in PsA compared to RA, in patients living in small-medium cities, in those who did not receive the diagnosis from a rheumatologist, in those who were previously misdiagnosed, and in seronegative RA.

The changes of intestinal flora and its relevance with memory Tfh and B cells in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with csDMARDs and csDMARDs + bDMARDs

BackgroundA growing body of experimental and clinical evidence has implicated gut microbiota in the onset and course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The imbalance of intestinal flora in RA patients may lead to abnormal expression of immune cells and related cytokines. PurposeConventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs combined with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs + bDMARDs) are widely used to treat RA, but the characteristics of gut microbiota before and after treatment and their relationship with memory Tfh/B cells and cytokines remain unclear. MethodsStool samples were collected from 50 RA patients and 25 healthy controls (HCs) for 16SrRNA gene sequencing. We examined the proportion of lymphocyte subsets in healthy controls and RA patients. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the levels of related cytokines in serum. The α and β diversity of intestinal flora, and the correlation between intestinal flora and clinical indicators, lymphocyte subsets, cytokines were analyzed. ResultAt the genus level, Ruminococcaceae_Ruminococcus was decreased in the csDMARDs and csDMARDs + bDMARDs treatment group, whereas Faecalibacterium was reduced in the csDMARDs treatment group, compared to untreated group. CD4+CD45RO+CCR7+CXCR5+central memory Tfh cells and CD4+CD45RO+CCR7-CXCR5+effector memory Tfh cells were significantly lower in the csDMARDs + bDMARDs treatment group than in untreated group. CD19+CD27+IgD+pre-switched memory B cells were higher in the csDMARDs and csDMARDs + bDMARDs treatment groups, whereas CD19+CD27+IgD-switched memory B cells were significantly lower than in untreated group. Ruminococcaceae_Ruminococcus was negatively correlated with CD19+CD27+IgD+ pre-switched memory B cells but positively correlated with CD4+CD45RO+CCR7-CXCR5+effector memory Tfh and CD19+CD27+IgD-switched memory B cells in patients with RA treated with DMARDs. ConclusionThe gut microbiota, memory Tfh cells, memory B cells, and cytokines of patients with RA changed significantly under different treatment regimens and had certain correlations with the clinical indicators of RA.

Characteristics and 6-Month Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Infliximab Biosimilar IFX-dyyb in a Real-World Setting.

Real-world studies describing biosimilar initiation or switching in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are limited. The aim of this study was to assess treatment patterns and effectiveness of real-world patients with RA initiating infliximab biosimilar IFX-dyyb (CT-P13; Inflectra®) in the USA. This observational study evaluated patients with RA from the CorEvitas RA Registry who initiated IFX-dyyb and had Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) recorded at baseline and 6months. The primary outcome was reaching low disease activity (LDA; CDAI ≤ 10) at 6months in patients with moderate or high disease activity (CDAI > 10) at baseline. Secondary outcomes were change at 6months in CDAI and certain patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patient data were stratified by prior treatment: biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARD)-naïve, reference infliximab (IFX-REF) or IFX biosimilar, or a non-IFX biologic or tsDMARD. Of 318 patients initiating IFX-dyyb, 176 had baseline and 6-month CDAI scores; 73 (41%) switched from IFX, 61 (35%) switched from another non-IFX/biologic/tsDMARD, 32 (18%) were naïve to biologics/tsDMARDs, and 10 (6%) switched from an IFX biosimilar. Among patients with moderate or high disease activity at baseline, 32.9% (95%CI 22.9, 42.9) achieved LDA at 6months. Mean 6-month change from baseline in CDAI was - 1.8 (95%CI - 3.3, - 0.3) overall; - 4.7 (- 7.6, - 1.7) in patients who switched from a non-IFX biologic/tsDMARD, - 4.1 (- 7.8, - 0.3) in biologic/tsDMARD-naïve patients, and 1.1 (- 0.4, 2.6) in patients who switched from IFX-REF/IFX biosimilar. Other clinical outcomes/PROs improved at 6months. Of the IFX-dyyb initiators, 68% remained on IFX-dyyb at 6months. In this real-world population of patients with RA initiating IFX-dyyb, the majority switched from IFX-REF or a non-IFX biologic/tsDMARD. CDAI remained stable in patients switching from IFX-REF/IFX biosimilar and improved in patients switching from a non-IFX biologic/tsDMARD and in biologic/tsDMARD-naïve patients.