Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Research Articles

Difficult-to-treat axial spondyloarthritis patients.

This study aimed to formulate D2T (difficult to treat) criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients and identify the prevalence of D2T patients and their characteristics. The cross-sectional study was conducted with 166 AxSpA patients (93 males, 73 females; mean age: 47.1±12.9 years; range, 19 to 78 years) between February 2023 and March 2023. The criteria were based on patients treated according to the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for AxSpA. Entry criteria were treatment failure to ≥2 biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs with two different mechanisms of action or ≥3 biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Potential preliminary factors for D2T criteria were analyzed, and the characteristics of the subjects matching D2T criteria were compared with those of others. One hundred forty-two ankylosing spondylitis patients and 24 nonradiographic AxSpA patients were included in the study. The rate of fulfilling the D2T criteria was 22.9% (n=38) among AxsPA patients treated with biological agents. The potential D2T criteria were met by 23.2% of ankylosing spondylitis and 20.8% of nonradiographic AxSpA patients. Baseline characteristics, such as sex, age, diagnosis age, occupation, and education, of D2T patients were not statistically different from other patients. The prevalence of fibromyalgia was higher in D2T patients (p<0.001). Disease activity indices and acute phase response indicators were higher and quality of life was worse in D2T patients. There was a considerable amount of AxSpA patients fulfilling the D2T criteria despite new and effective treatment agents.

Real-world risk factors for herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing tofacitinib treatment.

This study sought to assess the risk factors of herpes zoster (HZ) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tofacitinib (TOFA). This retrospective study reviewed RA patients receiving TOFA. We compared clinical characteristics, laboratory profiles, concomitant medication use, and HZ incidence in patients with and without recent biologic synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) treatment, which is defined as their administration ≤ 180 days prior to the initiation of TOFA treatment. We used univariate Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis to assess risk factors. Among 304 RA patients, 97 had recent bDMARDs use and 207 did not. Patients with recent bDMARDs use typically had lower weekly doses of methotrexate, less hydroxychloroquine use, and shorter follow-up times. In the recent bDMARDs group, 64 (66.0%) used tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), 19 (19.6%) used tocilizumab, and 14 (14.4%) used abatacept. The overall incidence rate (IR) of HZ was 5.62 per 100 person-years. Patients with recent bDMARDs use exhibited a higher HZ risk compared to those without recent bDMARDs use (IR ratio: 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-5.19, p = 0.028). Recent bDMARDs use (hazard ratio: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.12-4.95, p = 0.024) was an independent risk factor for HZ among multivariable analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed increased HZ risk in RA patients on TOFA with recent bDMARDs use (log-rank p = 0.015). HZ is common in RA patients treated with TOFA, and recent bDMARDs (TNFi, tocilizumab and abatacept) use is a risk factor of HZ. HZ vaccination, therefore, should be recommended for this group.

Treatment of early oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis with apremilast: primary outcomes at week 16 from the FOREMOST randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesOligoarticular psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is frequent but rarely studied. The objective was to assess the efficacy of apremilast in early oligoarticular PsA.MethodsFOREMOST (NCT03747939) was a phase 4 multicentre, randomised, double-blind,...

Hepatitis B reactivation in PsA patients: an SLR and meta-analysis for IL-17, IL-23 and JAK inhibitors.

Hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) constitutes a side effect of the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Even though HBVr risk of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents has long been established, the risk of targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs and anti-interleukin (anti-IL) agents remains largely unknown. We conducted a SLR (PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE) and metanalysis to examine the HBVr risk for the following: anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL23 and JAK-inhibitors in patients with chronic HBV infection (HBsAg presence or detectable HBV-DNA) and in patients with prior HBV infection (HBcAb-positive and HBsAg-negative). Meta-analysis was performed using both the fixed and random effects method and was conducted using the R computing language. Overall, our study revealed a low HBVr risk of < 6% in all agents; the risk was significantly higher for people having chronic compared with those with resolved HBV (14,4% vs 5.1%, respectively p< 0.01). There was no difference among different drugs in the HBVr rates [anti-IL-17: 4% (95% CI: 1-9%), anti-IL-12/IL-23: 2% (95% CI: 0-5%), JAK-inhibitors: 4% (95% CI: 1-8%), anti-IL23: 0%]. Of note, HBVr rate reached 28% in patients with chronic HBV who did not receive anti-viral treatment. For patients with resolved hepatitis the respective percentage was 4.7%. Overall, our meta-analysis shows that patients with chronic HBV receiving anti-IL-17, anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23 and JAK-inhibitors have significant risk for HBVr, especially if they are not under anti-viral treatment. In contrast, resolved HBV seems to offer minor risk for HBVr even without anti-viral treatment.

Adherence, Persistence, Healthcare Resource Use, and Costs in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Data from Two United States Claims Databases.

Associations between increased functional disability and higher healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs were reported in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We assessed characteristics/outcomes of patients with PsA receiving tofacitinib monotherapy vs combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Claims data from Optum® Clinformatics® Data Mart (OC) and Merative™ MarketScan® (MS) databases between December 2017 and February 2020 were analyzed. Outcomes assessed were adherence/persistence by therapy type (monotherapy/combination therapy); HCRU/costs (per patient per month) by periods on-treatment (sum time on tofacitinib) and off-treatment (sum time off tofacitinib [gap of > 60days]) plus therapy type. This analysis included 274 and 395 tofacitinib-treated patients in OC (70.4% female, mean age 54.4years) and MS (68.9% female, mean age 51.4years), respectively. Percentages of patients with a proportion of days covered ≥ 0.8 at 12months for monotherapy vs combination therapy were OC, 44.5% vs 53.8%; MS, 36.4% vs 45.7%. Generally similar trends were seen over 24months and for medication possession ratio ≥ 0.8. Median (95%confidence interval) times to treatment discontinuation for monotherapy vs combination therapy were OC, 10.1 (7.4-11.8) vs 16.7 (8.3-26.6) months; MS, 6.9(5.6-9.4) vs 11.0(6.1-13.9) months. During off-treatment vs on-treatment periods, numerical decreases were observedfor all-cause (OC, $5383 vs $6149; MS, $4145 vs $5180) and PsA-related costs (OC, $3237 vs $4515; MS, $2703 vs $3907) regardless of therapy type. During off-treatment vs on-treatment periods, numerical increases in outpatient visits for all-cause (OC, 2.37 vs 2.05; MS, 2.15 vs 1.99) and PsA-related visits (OC, 0.60 vs 0.46; MS, 0.47 vs 0.44) were observed, and PsA-related medications numerically decreased (OC, 1.21 vs 1.53; MS, 1.05 vs 1.48). In this USA-based claims analysis, tofacitinib adherence was numerically lower for patients with PsA receiving monotherapy vs combination therapy. Costs numerically decreased off-treatment vs on-treatment, irrespective of therapy type, driven by lower medication costs.

Potential difficult-to-treat psoriatic arthritis real-world prevalence and contributing factors.

The challenge of achieving low disease activity or remission in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an unmet need for many patients. Persistent disease activity in PsA may require treatment adjustments due to its complex pathogenesis and varied tissue involvement, highlighting the need for dedicated definitions. This study evaluates patients' frequency and contributing factors with potential "difficult-to-treat PsA (D2TPsA)", similar to the EULAR definition of D2T rheumatoid arthritis. A retrospective study was conducted at two tertiary centres to define potential D2TPsA, defined as failure of ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) and ≥2 biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs with different mechanisms of action. Of the 171 patients included in the study, 116 (67.8%) were women; the average age was 48.16 ±11.23 years. D2TPsA was detected in 33 patients (19.3%). This group exhibited a longer disease duration, higher disease burden (median number of tender and swollen joints, patient and physician global evaluation, morning stiffness, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, DAPSA), HLA-B27 positivity, and higher prevalence of peripheral involvement. Secukinumab usage and mean glucocorticosteroid dosage were significantly higher in the D2TPsA group. Comorbidities such as fibromyalgia (FM) and diabetes mellitus (DM) and the median number of comorbidities were significantly higher in D2TPsA. In multivariate analysis, FM, DM, and HLA-B27 positivity were independently associated with D2TPsA. This study underscores the impact of comorbidities on PsA disease activity and emphasises the need for further research to differentiate treatment challenges influenced by comorbidities from true treatment resistance.

Survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and early breast cancer treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

There have been concerns about the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for autoimmune disease in patients with recently diagnosed cancer. We assessed the survival of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and newly diagnosed early breast cancer (BC) treated with TNFi in the first two years after BC diagnosis. We identified patients in two datasets: (1) Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM), (2) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) and Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) Medicare-linked cohort. We grouped patients according to whether they received TNFi, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) only, or no DMARDs within 2years after BC. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) and BC-specific survival (BCSS). We conducted landmark analyses at years 1 and 2, with multivariable Cox regressions using propensity scores for adjustment. In the first year after BC, 165/970 (17.0%) and 201/1246 (16.1%) patients received TNFi in CDM and SEER/TCR-Medicare respectively. In the 1year landmark, no significant differences in OS were observed between patients treated with TNFi and patients treated with csDMARDs only in CDM (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-1.40) or SEER/TCR-Medicare (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31). BCSS (SEER/TCR-Medicare) was better in patients receiving TNFi than in those receiving csDMARDs only (HR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.98). In CDM, glucocorticoid therapy had worse OS than those without glucocorticoids (HR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.13-4.18). This was also observed in SEER/TCR-Medicare (not statistically significant). Similar results were observed for the 2year landmark. TNFi treatment during the first two years after early BC was not associated with worse survival.

Impact of blue-collar vs. white-collar occupations on disease burden in psoriatic arthritis patients: A Swiss clinical quality management in rheumatic diseases cohort study

Biomechanical stress may exacerbate inflammation in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This study aimed to investigate disease activity, work disability, and drug response/retention rates in PsA patients among two different occupation’s types: blue-collar workers (BCol) with manual labor versus white-collar workers (WCol) with sedentary occupations. PsA patients registered in the Swiss cohort (SCQM) were classified as BCol or WCol workers and assessed at the initiation of a biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (b-/tsDMARD). We compared the baseline characteristics at treatment start and the DAS28-CRP for the 1-year remission. Treatment retention was investigated using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Multivariable models were adjusted for potential confounders. Of 564 patients, 29% were BCol, and 71% were WCol workers. Baseline disease activity was comparable between both groups. BCol workers were predominantly male (79.8%) and more work disabled at baseline (84.0% vs. 27.9%; p < 0.01). One hundred seventy-four treatment courses (TCs) of 165 PsA patients were included for longitudinal analysis. Occupation did not significantly influence the achievement of DAS28-CRP remission at 1 year. Kaplan–Meier analysis (n = 671) indicated longer retention for BCol workers (mean retention duration: 3.15 years vs. 2.15 years, (p = 0.006). However, adjusted Cox regression analysis did not corroborate these findings. This study indicates that physically demanding occupations correlate with increased rates of work disability among PsA patients, while treatment response seems to be unaffected by the patients’ occupation type. Additional research is required to thoroughly comprehend the relationship between physical workload, disease activity, and treatment outcomes.Key Points• This study indicates that physically demanding occupations correlate with increased rates of work disability among PsA patients.• The treatment response among of PsA patients seems unaffected by the patients’ occupation type.

Effectiveness of methotrexate and bridging glucocorticoids with or without early introduction of a 6-month course of etanercept in early RA: results of the 2-year, pragmatic, randomised CareRA2020 trial

ObjectivesTo investigate if patients with early rheumatoid arthritis responding insufficiently to initial methotrexate (MTX) and bridging glucocorticoids (GCs) could benefit from early but temporary etanercept introduction as a second remission-induction...

Real-World Drug Survival of Biologics and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.

While the variety of biologics (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) available for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has proved to be efficacious in randomized clinical trials, there is a growing importance to understand the benefits and potential drawbacks of these different therapies in real-world settings, which includes bio-experienced and older patients as well. To evaluate the real-world adherence, drug survival, and discontinuation risk of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs among patients with PsA, comprising both younger and older patients. A retrospective studyusing a computerized database. Treatment-naïve and treatment-experiencedpatients with PsA, younger and older than 60 years, who initiated treatment with bDMARDs [TNF-α inhibitors (TNF-αis), IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17is), IL-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i)] or tsDMARDs (the PDE-4 inhibitor apremilast) during 2015-2018 were included. Adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) method. Time to discontinuation was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Risk of discontinuation was estimated by Cox proportional hazard model. We identified 427 eligible patients (22.2 % were older than 60 years), utilizing 673 treatment lines. The proportion of adherent patients (PDC ≥0.8) was similar (62.1-66.5%) across all lines of therapy and across different biologics (70.0-72.0%), while apremilast showed the lowest, in both treatment-naïve and experienced settings (43.6% and 25.5%, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that in the treatment-naïve TNF-αis had higher drug survival compared with apremilast (P = 0.032). Apremilast also had the lowest drug survival in the treatment-experienced group (P < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis by age groups showed similar drug survival rates in older (≥ 60 years) and younger (age < 60 years) patients, regardless of treatment-experience status. The multivariable model showed that apremilast had increased risk for discontinuation compared with TNF-αis. Adherence, drug survival and risk for discontinuation were similar for all included bDMARDs, regardless of treatment experience status, while apremilast showed lower rates and increased risk. Adherence and discontinuation rate were similar in older and younger patients. With the variety of drug modes of action available for patients with PsA, these findings may assist caregivers in selecting the appropriate treatment.

Additional Value of Ultrasound in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis within Treatment Target.

Background: In psoriatic arthritis (PsA), musculoskeletal ultrasound is a complementary tool to physical examination, useful even in patients in remission to detect subclinical activity. Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess the ultrasound prevalence of active enthesitis and synovitis in patients who reached the therapeutic target. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients with at least 6 months of therapy with a targeted synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug who were in treatment target (i.e., DAPSA < 14). Patients underwent bilateral clinical and ultrasound examination of the elbow lateral epicondyle, quadriceps insertion, distal patellar tendon insertion, and Achilles enthesis for assessing enthesitis, and hand and foot joints for assessing synovitis. Enthesitis and synovitis were considered active if the power Doppler signal showed at least a score of one. Results: The study included 51 PsA patients, women (52.9%), with an average age of 55 years. Although the patients were within the DAPSA treatment target, 21.6% had at least one painful enthesis at clinical examination, 19.6% had ultrasound evidence of at least one active enthesitis and 15.7% had ultrasound signs of at least one active synovitis. Conclusions: Among PsA patients thought to be within the therapeutic target, ultrasound detected a non-negligible percentage of active enthesitis and synovitis.

Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by age (

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in older patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is a post-hoc analysis of KAKEHASI (NCT02293902) and HARUKA (NCT02373202) trials with stratification by age (<65 and ≥65 years). Patients with moderately-to-severely active RA were treated with sarilumab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or as monotherapy. The primary endpoints in KAKEHASI and HARUKA trials were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) responses at Week 24 and safety, respectively. Secondary endpoints were other RA disease activity measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Approximately 20% of patients were aged ≥65 years in treatment arms across both trials, except the sarilumab+csDMARDs arm (40%, 12/30). ACR20 response rates were similar between age groups across sarilumab treatment arms and similar results were obtained for CDAI scores. Safety profiles were similar between age groups except for a higher incidence of serious adverse events in patients aged ≥65 years in the sarilumab+MTX arm. In Japanese patients with RA enrolled in phase 3 studies for sarilumab, no clear difference in efficacy or safety was observed between patients aged <65 and ≥65 years.

The effects of sarilumab as monotherapy and in combination with non-methotrexate disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on unacceptable pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post-hoc analysis of the HARUKA phase 3 study.

To investigate unacceptable pain (UP; visual analogue scale [VAS] >40 mm) and uncontrolled inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥1.0 mg/dL) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving sarilumab (SAR) as monotherapy or in combination with non-methotrexate conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (SAR+csDMARDs). In the HARUKA phase 3 study (NCT02373202), Japanese patients received either SAR monotherapy (n=61) or SAR+csDMARDs (n=30). In this post-hoc analysis, changes in the proportions of patients with/without UP and controlled/uncontrolled inflammation were assessed over 52 weeks. At baseline, 80.3% (49/61) of patients receiving SAR monotherapy had UP and this proportion decreased with treatment to 55.9% (33/59) at Week 4 and 15.5% (9/58) at Week 52. The SAR+csDMARDs group achieved a reduction in UP from 73.3% (22/30) at baseline to 34.5% (10/29) at Week 4 and 0% (0/24) by Week 52. At baseline, 34.4% (21/61) and 50% (15/30) of patients had both UP and uncontrolled inflammation in the SAR monotherapy and SAR+csDMARDs groups; by Week 2, the proportions decreased to 6.6% (4/61) and 3.3% (1/30), respectively; and 0% in both groups by Week 52. UP and inflammation were reduced in patients with active RA in Japan in both SAR monotherapy and SAR+csDMARDs treatment groups.

The SMILE study: Study of long-term methotrexate and iguratimod combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation and joint destruction. Iguratimod (IGU) is a novel conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) with good efficacy and safety for the treatment of active RA in China and Japan. However, the long-term effects of IGU on the progression of bone destruction or radiographic progression in patients with active RA remain unknown. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of iguratimod (IGU), a combination of methotrexate (MTX) and IGU, and IGU in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were naïve to MTX. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted at 28 centers for over 52weeks in China. In total, 911 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive MTX monotherapy (10-15mg weekly, n=293), IGU monotherapy (25mg twice daily, n=297), or IGU+MTX (10-15mg weekly for MTX and 25mg twice daily for IGU, n=305) for 52weeks. The patients' clinical characteristics, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), disease activity score in 28 joints-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) were assessed at baseline. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with≥20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response and changes in the van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (vdH-mTSS) at week 52. The proportions of patients achieving an ACR20 response at week 52 were 77.44%, 77.05 %, and 65.87% for IGU monotherapy, IGU + MTX, and MTX monotherapy, respectively. The non-inferiority of IGU monotherapy to MTX monotherapy was established with the ACR20 (11.57%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.35-18.79%; P<0.001) and vdH-mTSS (-0.37; 95% CI, -1.22-0.47; P=0.022). IGU monotherapy was also superior to MTX monotherapy in terms of ACR20 (P=0.002) but not the vdH-mTSS. The superiority of IGU+MTX over MTX monotherapy was confirmed in terms of the ACR20 (11.18%; 95% CI, 3.99-18.37%; P=0.003), but not in the vdH-mTSS (-0.68; 95% CI, -1.46-0.11; P=0.091). However, the difference in the incidence rates of adverse events was not statistically significant. IGU monotherapy/IGU+MTX showed a more favorable clinical response than did MTX monotherapy. IGU may have some clinical benefits over MTX in terms of radiographic progression, implying that IGU may be considered as an initial therapeutic option for patients with active RA. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT01548001.

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to biological treatments: results through 5 years from the SELECT-BEYOND study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib over 5 years among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a long-term extension (LTE) of the SELECT-BEYOND phase 3 trial.MethodsPatients refractory to...

Patients with High Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Exhibit Better Response to Filgotinib as Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

High baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with positive responses to biologic tumor necrosis factor inhibition and negative responses to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) triple therapy. Datasets from three randomized clinical trials in patients with RA were used to test the hypothesis that baseline NLR is associated with improved clinical response to filgotinib in methotrexate (MTX)-naïve or MTX-experienced RA populations. Patients from FINCH 1 (inadequate response to MTX, MTX-IR; NCT02889796), FINCH 2 (inadequate response to biologic DMARDs; NCT02873936), and FINCH 3 (MTX-naïve; NCT02886728) were classified as baseline NLR-High or baseline NLR-Low based on a previously published cut point of 2.7. In total, 3365 patients were included across the three studies. Differences in clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were determined using linear-regression models. Control-arm patients (placebo + MTX/placebo + csDMARD) classified as NLR-High exhibited worse continuous clinical and PRO responses at week 12 across clinical trials compared to NLR-Low patients. In contrast, NLR-High patients who received FIL 200mg + MTX/csDMARD exhibited consistently better responses after 12weeks compared to NLR-Low patients across clinical trials, clinical endpoints, and PROs. These trends were most prominent among the MTX-IR population. The 2.7 baseline NLR cut point could be used to enrich for patients most likely to benefit from the addition of filgotinib to background MTX/csDMARD. Use of baseline NLR as part of therapeutic decision-making would not require additional diagnostics and could contribute to improved outcomes for patients with RA. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728.

Vaccination Rates and Influencing Factors in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis and Immunosuppressive Treatment-A Survey-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who receive immunosuppressive therapy are at risk of infection due to impaired immune function and immunosuppressive medication. Vaccination plays a crucial role in preventing infections in this population. However, vaccination rates and factors influencing vaccination uptake in axSpA patients still need to be adequately studied. This study was designed to determine the vaccination rates of vaccines covered by health insurance in this particular group in Turkey and attitudes towards vaccines and infections. This survey included 199 patients with axSpA who visited our outpatient clinic in June, July, and August 2023 and received biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The mean age of the participants was 43.7 ± 0.7 years, and the majority were male (66.3%). The majority of the patients were vaccinated against COVID-19 (85.4%), followed by hepatitis B (41.2%), influenza (20.1%), and pneumococcal pneumonia (10.5%). While awareness of COVID-19 vaccination was widespread (100%), knowledge of other vaccines was lower (hepatitis B 80.9%, influenza 70.3%, pneumococcal 60.3%, respectively). Educational interventions targeting patients and healthcare professionals are needed to improve vaccination rates in this population. Our findings emphasize the need for strategies to increase vaccination rates in axSpA patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Removing barriers to vaccination and raising awareness of the importance of vaccination are critical to optimizing vaccination practices in this vulnerable population.

A Canadian Retrospective Chart Review Evaluating Concomitant Methotrexate De-escalation Patterns in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARDs.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) guidelines recommend methotrexate (MTX)-anchored therapy with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs); however, tolerability issues often lead to non-adherence. Canadian data on MTX tapering and/or withdrawal following b/tsDMARD initiation are minimal. This chart review assessed frequency of MTX tapering or withdrawal following b/tsDMARD initiation and the impact on disease status in Canadian adults with RA. Eligible patients had received MTX for ≥ 3months before b/tsDMARD initiation. The b/tsDMARD was prescribed continuously for ≥ 18months. Patients taking > 10mg/day oral prednisone or equivalent were excluded. Eight hundred eighty-nine patients (mean baseline MTX dose 19.0mg/week) prescribed b/tsDMARDs (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor 52.1%, Janus kinase inhibitor 18.3%, interleukin-6 inhibitor [IL-6i] 11.9%, other 17.7%) were evaluated at 22 Canadian centers. Within 2years of b/tsDMARD initiation, MTX was tapered in 123 (13.8%) patients and discontinued in 147 (16.5%), most commonly due to planned tapering (36.6%) and patient decision (27.2%), respectively, and most commonly with IL-6i use (34.9%). The MTX dose was unchanged for 582 (65.5%) patients and increased for 37 (4.2%). Missing data limit interpretations of MTX dose effects on some secondary endpoints and challenge the assertion that a disease activity measure-based treat-to-target approach is routinely used in Canadian rheumatology practice. Methotrexate tapering or withdrawal occurred in 30.4% of Canadians with RA within 2years following b/tsDMARD initiation. Baseline disease activity measures were missing from many medical records. However, for patients with baseline assessments, MTX tapering or discontinuation did not worsen disease activity.

Gender Differences in Perceptions of Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Impact, Management, and Physician Interactions: Results from a Global Patient Survey.

We evaluated the impact of gender on disease severity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment management, and patient-healthcare professional (HCP) interactions from the perspectives of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Data were collected from a global online patient survey conducted by The Harris Poll (November 2, 2017 to March 12, 2018). Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18years, with a self-reported diagnosis of PsA for > 1year, had visited a rheumatologist/dermatologist in the past 12months, and had reported previously using ≥ 1 conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Data were stratified by gender and analyzed descriptively, inferentially by binomial (chi-square) tests, and by multivariate logistic regression models. Data from 1286 patients who participated were included: 52% were female, 48% were male. Varying perceptions of disease severity between males and females were indicated by differences in symptoms leading to a diagnosis of PsA, and in symptoms reported despite treatment; more females than males reported joint tenderness, skin patches/plaques, and enthesitis. More females than males reported a major/moderate impact of PsA on their physical activity and emotional/mental well-being. Reasons for switching medication differed between genders, with more females switching because they perceived their medication to not be effective enough related to their joint symptoms. More females than males were very satisfied with their communication with their rheumatologist and were more likely to discuss the impact of PsA on their daily lives, their treatment satisfaction, and treatment goals with their rheumatologist. Patients' perceptions of the impact of PsA on HRQoL, treatment management, and interactions with HCPs varied between males and females. More females than males reported major/moderate physical and emotional impacts of PsA. When treating patients, it is important for HCPs to consider the potential impact of gender on patients' experience of PsA and its symptoms. Graphical plain language summary available for this article.

Retention Rate of Ixekizumab in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Real-World Study.

We aimed to examine the drug retention rate (DRR) of the interleukin-17 inhibitor ixekizumab in a real-world monocentric cohort of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients and to assess the predictors of drug discontinuation. Consecutive PsA patients who underwent treatment with ixekizumab from October 2019 to February 2023 were enrolled in this observational, retrospective, monocentric study. Clinical records were assessed at baseline and throughout the follow-up period. We collected sociodemographic data, smoking habits, body mass index, the presence of Human Leukocyte Antigen B27, comorbidities, disease involvement and duration, previous therapy, discontinuation of ixekizumab, reasons for discontinuation, and adverse events (AEs). DRR was evaluated as time to drug discontinuation and assessed through Kaplan-Meier curves. Baseline factors predicting drug discontinuation were investigated through logistic regression models. Eighty PsA patients were included in this study. Ixekizumab was administered at a dose of 160 mg by subcutaneous injection at baseline, followed by 80 mg every four weeks thereafter. Ixekizumab had a 38-month-cumulative DRR of 43.8%, accounting for both inefficacy and AEs. When considering only inefficacy, the DRR was 62.6%. Comorbidities (p = 0.665), obesity (p = 0.665), smoking (p = 0.884), disease duration ≤ 2 years (p = 0.071), axial (p = 0.131) and skin involvement (p = 0.460), and previous therapies, including conventional synthetic (p = 0.504) and biological (p = 0.474) Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs), as well as the number of previous bDMARDs or targeted synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (tsDMARDs), did not significantly affect the DRR (p = 0.349). Multivariate analysis found no independent predictors of drug discontinuation. The most frequent AEs leading to discontinuation were skin reactions; no severe infections were observed. In our real-world study, comorbidities, disease duration, and previous therapies did not affect the DRR of ixekizumab. Ixekizumab had a favorable safety profile, with no severe AEs observed.