Post-myeloproliferative neoplasm secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (Post-MPN sAML) is an aggressive and lethal hematologic malignancy arising from myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Hyperactivation of JAK/STAT signaling is present in 50-90% of MPNs, underscoring its role in driving MPN pathogenesis and transformation to acute sAML. Ruxolitinib, a Type-I JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis, was tested in a Phase II clinical trial in post-MPN sAML. Despite enhancing patients' quality of life, ruxolitinib did not exert major improvements on disease outcome (Eghtedar et al, 2012). Thus, there is an urgent need to find synergistic drug combinations capable of complementing the therapeutic activity of JAK2 inhibitors in post-MPN sAML. Here, we demonstrate that combination treatment of ruxolitinib and CBP30, a bromodomain inhibitor of histone acetyltransferases (HAT) CREBBP and p300, enhances the therapeutic activity of ruxolitinib in post-MPN sAML using high throughput genetic screens, in vitro functional assays, transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling and mouse xenograft in vivo experiments. To identify druggable determinants of JAK2 inhibitor response in post-MPN sAML, we performed genome-wide loss-of-function CRISPR screens in sAML HEL cells treated with four different JAK2 inhibitors, including ruxolitinib. We discovered that depletion of the histone acetyl transferase CREBBP sensitizes HEL cells to JAK2 inhibition (Figure 1A). Pharmacological inhibition of JAK/STAT signaling and HAT activity using a combination of ruxolitinib and CREBBP inhibitors significantly reduced the proliferation of sAML cells HEL and SET2 (Figure 1B). Among the CREBBP inhibitors, CBP30 synergizes best with ruxolitinib having Chou-Talalay combination indices of 0.152 and 0.704 in HEL and SET2, respectively. Moreover, combination treatment of ruxolitinib and CBP30 markedly increased apoptosis and induced cell cycle arrest at G1 in HEL. To mechanistically characterize the synergism between ruxolitinib and CBP30, we performed ChIP-seq to profile STAT5 binding and H3K27ac levels in HEL cells treated with DMSO, ruxolitinib, CBP30 and their combination. STAT5 binding profiles did not reveal major differences in ruxolitinib versus ruxolitinib + CBP30 treated cells, suggesting that the drug combination does not significantly alter STAT5 binding. Conversely, we noticed striking global changes in H3K27ac levels in the combination compared with DMSO or single agents, indicating that the synergistic effect between ruxolitinib and CBP30 is mediated by substantial changes in transcriptional regulation. Notably, analysis of H3K27ac downregulated and upregulated sites identified enrichments in motifs recognized by FOS/SMAD4 and GATA transcription factors, respectively. These TFs are involved in the regulation of myeloid differentiation implicating a synergistic regulation of relevant myeloid differentiation pathways by the combination of JAK2 and CREBBP inhibitors in sAML. Furthermore, ruxolitinib + CBP30 treatment in HEL elicits a unique transcriptome profile with expression deregulation of genes associated with cell cycle, DNA repair, HAT activity and TGF-beta signaling as determined by DAVID functional annotation analysis. Lastly, to evaluate the synergistic effects of ruxolitinib and CBP30 in vivo, we treated luciferase-expressing HEL sAML mouse xenografts with vehicle, ruxolitinib (80 mg/kg), CBP30 (30 mg/kg) and ruxolitinib (80 mg/kg) + CBP30 (30 mg/kg). Combination of ruxolitinib and CBP30 displayed significant decrease in leukemia burden after 4 weeks of treatment as monitored by bioluminescence imaging and quantification. Consistently, mice treated with both drugs also showed remarkable decrease in their white blood cell count and spleen size compared with single-agent-treated and vehicle-treated mice. Collectively, our results substantiate the combinatorial therapeutic targeting of JAK/STAT signaling and HAT activity as a potential treatment approach for post-MPN sAML.