Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms Research Articles

Effects of Dietary Factors on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Among the Student and Faculty of Public and Private Medical Universities of Karachi, Pakistan

Aim: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) results from gastric contents moving into the esophagus, causing distressing symptoms and complications. Its prevalence has surged in the past two decades, notably in Asian countries. While nutritional management is common in clinical practice, definitive recommendations remain unclear. Few studies have explored the link between food and GERD. Methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study involving 359 eligible subjects out of 405 participants. We employed purposive sampling, targeting medical students, teachers, and staff aged 18 to 60 from four universities. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 with a confidence interval of 95% and a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Results: Among participants, 56.5% were female, with an average age of 24.55. Notably, 70.4% tested positive for GERD. Trigger foods included oily (24.2%) and spicy (45.4%) items, while 24.2% reported no specific triggers. Conclusion: This study underscores the significance of dietary modifications in managing GERD symptoms. Tailoring diets to individual symptoms and adjusting meal size, timing, and composition offer more benefits than elimination diets, particularly focusing on smaller meals and avoiding late-night eating habits. Keywords: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), reflux, esophageal disease, diet, nutrition, food intake, heartburn, fast-food.

The association between night eating syndrome and GERD symptoms among university students at An-Najah National University in Palestine: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundNight eating syndrome (NES) is a kind of eating disorder. NES association with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms among university students is still not fully understood. We aimed to determine the relationship between NES and the presence of GERD symptoms among university students at An-Najah National University in Palestine.MethodsThis study involved undergraduate students from An-Najah National University. The data were collected through online surveys from November to December 2023. The sampling frame involved voluntary sampling, as the data were collected using a structured questionnaire to collect data on sociodemographic variables, medical history, lifestyle habits, nutritional status, GERD risk, and NES. The GERD questionnaire (GerdQ) was used to assess symptoms, while the Arabic version of the validated Night Eating Questionnaire (NEQ) was used to assess night eating. Physical activity was assessed using the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (SF-IPAQ), and adherence to a Mediterranean diet was assessed using the validated Arabic version of the MEDAS. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were also conducted to assess the study hypotheses.ResultsThe study involved 554 participants, 59.9% female. A total of 33.4% reported GERD symptoms, with 10.3% having NES. A strong association was observed between GERD and NES and between GERD and physical activity. Night eating syndrome (AOR = 2.84, CI = 1.07–3.19), high physical activity (AOR = 0.473, CI = 1.05–3.19), and non-smoking (AOR = 0.586, CI = 1.27–7.89) were identified as independent predictors of GERD symptoms.ConclusionThis study revealed that 33.4% of undergraduate students were at risk of GERD, with night eaters having a greater risk. GERD risk was negatively associated with physical activity level and smoking status. No associations were found between GERD risk and weight status, Mediterranean diet adherence, sociodemographic factors, or sleep disturbances.

Endoscopic full-thickness plication along with argon plasma coagulation for treatment of proton pump inhibitor dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND Most endoscopic anti-reflux interventions for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) management are technically challenging to practice with inadequate data to support it utility. Therefore, this study was carried to evaluate the effectiveness and safety newer endoscopic full-thickness fundoplication (EFTP) device along with Argon Plasma Coagulation to treat individuals with GERD. AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety newer EFTP device along with Argon Plasma Coagulation to treat individuals with GERD. METHODS This study was a single-center comparative analysis conducted on patients treated at a Noble Institute of Gastroenterology, Ahmedabad, hospital between 2020 and 2022. The research aimed to retrospectively analyze patient data on GERD symptoms and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dependence who underwent EFTP using the GERD-X system along with argon plasma coagulation (APC). The primary endpoint was the mean change in the total gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score compared to the baseline measurement at the 3-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints encompassed enhancements in the overall GERD-HRQL score, improvements in GERD symptom scores at the 3 and changes in PPI usage at the 3 and 12-month time points. RESULTS In this study, patients most were in Hill Class II, and over half had ineffective esophageal motility. Following the EFTP procedure, there were significant improvements in heartburn and regurgitation scores, as well as GERD-HRQL scores (P < 0.001). PPI use significantly decreased, with 82.6% not needing PPIs or prokinetics at end of 1 year. No significant adverse events related to the procedures were observed in either group. CONCLUSION The EFTP along with APC procedure shows promise in addressing GERD symptoms and improving patients' quality of life, particularly for suitable candidates. Moreover, the application of a lone clip with APC yielded superior outcomes and exhibited greater cost-effectiveness.

Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Outcome in 13 Patients

Abstract Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) represents a common burden after bariatric procedures, particularly after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). While GERD after LSG is usually treated with conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), there are limited surgical options to manage medically refractory GERD after RYGB due to the altered anatomy. The use of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is one option, but the literature on this topic remains scarce. Aims To present mid- to long-term outcome of patients treated with MSA for GERD after RYGB. Methods We performed a retrospective single-centre analysis of data from patients who underwent laparoscopic MSA for GERD between August 2015 and December 2023, and who had previously RYGB. Outcomes were persistence/recurrence of GERD symptoms, use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and need for redo surgery related to MSA complications or recurrent GERD. Results Of the 312 MSA procedures performed for GERD, we identified 13 patients who underwent laparoscopic MSA after RYGB. There were 10 female patients (77%), with mean age of 42.6 ± 13.7 years and mean BMI of 27.2 ± 2.7 kg/m2. Seven patients (54%) had de novo GERD. All MSA procedures included hiatoplasty. Median follow-up was 40 months (range 7-72) and median time between RYGB and MSA placement was 42 months (range 8-242). One patient (8%) required endoscopic dilatation due to persistent postoperative dysphagia. Two patients (15%) needed redo surgery: 1 redo hiatoplasty with adhaesiolysis and 1 conversion to esophagojejunostomy with implant removal. There was no erosion or migration of the MSA implant. Overall satisfactory control of reflux with discontinuation or reduction of PPIs was achieved in 9 patients (69%). Conclusion The use of MSA to manage refractory GERD after RYGB is a safe option and was effective in 69% of patients but is limited to patients with intact oesophageal motility.

Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease predicts low voltage zones in the posteroinferior left atrium in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

BackgroundThe presence of low voltage zones (LVZs) in the left atrium (LA) is associated with the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) following pulmonary vein isolation. Numerous studies have posited a link between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and AF, attributing this relationship to the anatomical proximity of the esophagus to the posteroinferior wall of the LA. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate if GERD can predict the presence of LVZs in the posteroinferior wall of the LA. MethodsFive hundred and fifty-one patients with persistent AF, scheduled for their first AF ablation procedure, were prospectively enrolled. Voltage maps were collected using a multipolar catheter, and LVZs were defined as areas measuring ≥3 cm2 with a peak-to-peak bipolar voltage of <0.5 mV. Information on GERD symptoms was gathered from the participants through a self-administered questionnaire. ResultsLongstanding persistent AF was present in 22.3% of the total cohort. GERD was present in 29% of the patients and LVZs in the posteroinferior wall in 12.7%. In the multivariable analysis, patients with GERD were found to have more than twice the odds (Odds Ratio: 2.26, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.24-4.13, P=0.008) of exhibiting LVZs in the posteroinferior wall of the LA compared to patients without GERD. GERD was not associated with LVZs in any other region of the LA. ConclusionGERD was found to be independently associated with LVZs in the posteroinferior LA. This association may be attributable to inflammation and may partly explain the link between GERD and AF.

Relationship between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) with Quality of Sleep

Background. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder caused by reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus, as a result, it causes various symptoms or complications . GERD is a commonly prevalent gastrointestinal disorder in medical students. Based on data from the 2006 US National Health and Wellness survey observing respondents who experienced heartburn at least twice a month, 89% of respondents experiencing nightime GERD symptoms, it showed that the presence of nighttime GERD was associated with decrease quality of sleep. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between GERD and students’ sleep quality in Faculty of Medicine USU 2020-2022. Method. Cross sectional design with total sampling method. Data collection was carried out using an online questionnaire in the form of a google form. The questionnaires used were GERD-Q, FSSG, PSQI, and ISI. The analysis used was univariate and bivariate analysis with Chi-square. Results. This study involved 378 respondents, 114 people (30.2%) with GERD, 67 people (58.8%) with severe of GERD, 286 people (75.7%) had a bad quality of sleep, and 43 people (15%) with moderate and severe of insomnia. The results of statistical analysis showed an association between GERD and quality of sleep. Conclusion. There was a correlation between GERD and quality of sleep of USU Faculty of Medicine students class 2020-2022

The relationship of gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma control

ABSTRACT Purpose To study whether ACT responses are confounded by gastro-esophageal status (GERD), and if this is in concordance with the variation in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1%) and Fractional Excretion of Nitric Oxide (FeNO). Materials and Methods This is a prospective cohort study (n = 307). Patients were surveyed for demographics data, and underwent ACT scoring, FEV1% and FeNO testing. Results Patients with GERD had mean ACT scores that were 4.1 (p < .001) lower than without-GERD group. Not-well-controlled asthmatics (FEV1% <80, high FeNO) with-GERD had mean ACT scores that were 2.9 (p < .001) for FEV1% <80 and 3.8 (p = .008) for high FeNO lower than without-GERD group respectively. Well-controlled asthmatics (FEV1% ≥80, low FeNO) with-GERD had mean ACT scores that were 5.2 (p < .001) for FEV1% ≥80 and 5.1 (p < .001) for low FeNO lower than without-GERD group respectively. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that symptoms of GERD can lead to an inaccurate perception of asthma control and ACT as compared to objective measures, such as FEV1% and FeNO. Hence, this can lead to mismanagement of asthma, especially when objective measures are not conducted along with ACT.

Therapeutic effect of Wendan Decoction combined with mosapride on gastroesophageal reflux disease after esophageal cancer surgery.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common complication of esophageal cancer surgery that can affect quality of life and increase the risk of esophageal stricture and anastomotic leakage. Wendan Decoction (WDD) is a traditional Chinese herbal formula used to treat various gastrointestinal disorders, such as gastritis, functional dyspepsia, and irritable bowel syndrome. Mosapride, a prokinetic agent, functions as a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 agonist, enhancing gastrointestinal motility. To evaluate the therapeutic effects of WDD combined with mosapride on GERD after esophageal cancer surgery. Eighty patients with GERD were randomly divided into treatment (receiving WDD combined with mosapride) and control (receiving mosapride alone) groups. The treatment was conducted from January 2021 to January 2023. The primary outcome was improved GERD symptoms as measured using the reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ). The secondary outcomes were improved esophageal motility (measured using esophageal manometry), gastric emptying (measured using gastric scintigraphy), and quality of life [measured via the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey]. The treatment group showed a notably reduced RDQ score and improved esophageal motility parameters, such as lower esophageal sphincter pressure, peristaltic amplitude, and peristaltic velocity compared to the control group. The treatment group showed significantly higher gastric emptying rates and SF-36 scores (in both physical and mental domains) compared to the control group. No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. WDD combined with mosapride is an effective and safe therapy for GERD after esophageal cancer surgery. It can improve GERD symptoms, esophageal motility, gastric emptying, and the quality of life of patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to confirm these findings.

Comparison of Los Angeles Grades of Erosive Esophagitis Scored by Local Investigators vs Central Adjudicators in a Clinical Trial

Approximately 30% of patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms have endoscopic evidence of erosive esophagitis (EE).1 The severity of EE is commonly graded using the Los Angeles (LA) classification system as grade A (minimal) to D (very severe), depending on the extent of endoscopically visible mucosal breaks (Supplementary Figure1).2 Accurate grading of EE severity is crucial in clinical trials of medical EE treatments, as EE severity strongly influences both initial rates of healing and the likelihood of recurrence during maintenance treatment.3,4 Almost all EE treatment studies have relied exclusively on local investigators' grading of EE severity to determine study eligibility and response to treatment. Those few studies that included central adjudication did not assess the reliability of grading by local investigators.5 Unlike typical studies of EE treatment, the phase III clinical trial of vonoprazan versus lansoprazole for the treatment of EE (NCT04124926) mandated central adjudication of endoscopic grading for study participation.6 The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the rate of agreement between local investigators and central adjudicators for EE grading during screening for entrance into that clinical trial.

PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GERD) IN MEDICAL COLLEGE STUDENTS

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus, leading to heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain. Objectives: The study's main aim is to find the prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in medical college students. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Allama Iqbal Medical College Lahore from October 2023 to March 2024. Data were collected from 550 medical college students from 1st year, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th year. Data were collected through an online survey, including demographic data, GERD symptoms, dietary habits and lifestyle factors, and stress levels. GERD symptoms were reported, which include all data related to heartburn, chest pain and dysphagia. Results: Data were collected from 550 participants. The mean age of the participants (with GERD) was 24.0 ± 3.0 years, and without GERD, 23.0 ± 2.5 years. There were 65% female and 35 % male in the GERD group and 55% female and 45% male in the without GERD group. Students with GERD exhibited significantly higher prevalence rates of certain lifestyle factors compared to those without GERD. Specifically, students with GERD reported higher rates of consumption of spicy/acidic foods (50% vs. 35%), high intake of caffeine/carbonated beverages (60% vs. 40%), irregular meal patterns (40% vs. 20%), large meals before bedtime (30% vs. 15%), and sedentary lifestyle behaviors (70% vs. 40%). These differences were statistically significant, as indicated by the p-values &lt;0.05 for consumption of spicy/acidic foods and large meals before bedtime, &lt;0.01 for high intake of caffeine/carbonated beverages and irregular meal patterns, and &lt;0.001 for sedentary lifestyle behaviours. Conclusion: It is concluded that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents a significant health concern among medical college students, with a notable prevalence of symptoms reported in this population.

P137 A multinational survey to identify the clinicians perspectives concerning proton pump inhibitors in patients with systemic sclerosis

Abstract Background/Aims Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, there is scarce evidence to support their use while long-term safety has been questioned. The aim of our study was to identify healthcare providers’ perspectives and experience regarding PPIs therapy in SSc patients. Methods An online survey in English language targeting clinicians involved in the care of SSc patients, was developed and distributed through social media and international physician networks. The survey was launched on 27th November 2022 and kept open for three weeks. Results Responses from 227 clinicians from 36 countries were recorded: most of them (86%) were between 30-70 years and gender was equally represented (F: 52%; M: 48%). The majority ‘agreed’ (41%) or ‘strongly agreed’ (45%) that GERD is a major cause of morbidity in SSc. Lifestyle modifications and non-pharmacological approaches alone were seldom (16%) considered effective. Only half of respondents ‘agreed’ (43%) or ‘strongly agreed’ (11%) there is solid evidence supporting PPIs efficacy in SSc. A range of PPIs was prescribed by clinicians, most frequently pantoprazole (74%), esomeprazole (72%), omeprazole (72%), and lansoprazole (68%). The most common reasons for PPIs prescription (Table 1) were symptomatic GERD unresponsive to lifestyle modification (95%), objective evidence of GERD (82%), and hoarseness or respiratory symptoms (71%). Multiple concerns were raised about PPI long-term safety. The three highest (mean, 10 being very concerned) reasons were: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (5.5), osteoporosis (5.4), and drug interactions (5.2). There were significant differences in attitudes towards surgery for refractory GERD: ‘strongly disagreed’ (14%), ‘disagreed’ (26%) ‘neutral’ (52%), ‘agreed’ (13%), ‘strongly agreed’ (3%). Furthermore, half of respondents had concerns about potential complications (i.e., worsening of dysphagia): ‘disagreed’ (26%) or ‘strongly disagreed’ (6%), ‘neutral (52%), ‘agreed’ (13%), ‘strongly agreed’ (3%). Conclusion Our survey confirms that PPIs are frequently prescribed for GERD in SSc patients, despite the absence of randomized clinical trials demonstrating their efficacy and safety. Clinicians are concerned about side effects, especially regarding long-term use. There is significant heterogeneity in attitudes towards surgery for refractory GERD. Future research and practical treatment recommendation are urgently needed. Disclosure G. Bandini: None. A. Alunno: None. F. Oliveira Pinheiro: None. C. Campochiaro: None. I. Galetti: None. P. Matucci Cerinic: None. B. Ruaro: None. A. Moggi Pignone: None. L. Dagna: None. M. Matucci Cerinic: None. Z. McMahan: None. M. Hughes: None.

The index of failure of the antireflux function of the cardia (IFAFC), as a criterion for the effectiveness of its videolaparoscopic correction for gastroesophageal reflux disease (gerd) in pthe index of failure of the antireflux function of the cardia after video-laparoscopic correction in gerd patients with hiatal hernia

The purpose of the study was to create an index based on the total results of special research methods that characterizes the antireflux function of the cardia in the long term after its video-laparoscopic correction in GERD patients with hiatal hernia (HH). Long-term results of video-laparoscopic antireflux intervention in 213 patients with GERD and HH were analyzed. Based on the results of a remote survey and instrumental examination, the patients were divided into three groups. The first group consisted of the patients who had symptoms of GERD, but the presence of pathological gastroesophageal reflux was not confirmed by instrumental methods (122 patients, 57.3 %); the second group included the patients with recurrent GERD (19 patients, 8.9 %); the third group (72 patients, 33.8 %) consisted of the patients without GERD symptoms or its recurrence. To assess the antireflux function of the cardia in the long term after its video-laparoscopic correction, the index of failure of the antireflux function of the cardia (IFAFC) was developed based on the generalized results of instrumental research methods. Before surgery in all groups of the patients, the IFAFC did not have a statistically significant difference and indicated a very significant severity of signs of failure of the antireflux function of the cardia (0.70±0.06, 0.74±0.05, and 0.70±0.06, respectively; р&gt;0.05). In the long term after surgery, the patients with false-positive GERD symptoms showed an improvement in the IFAFC by 87.14 % (p&lt;0.001), the patients without symptoms of GERD and its recurrence — by 92.86 % (p&lt;0.001), and the patients with recurrent GERD — by 16.22 % (p&lt;0.05). The IFAFC allows assessing the results of the antireflux surgery. In the absence of recurrent GERD, the IFAFC is 0.05±0.01; in patients with recurrent GERD, it is 0.62±0.07. The IFAFC equal to 0.09±0.07 is typical for patients at risk with false-positive symptoms of GERD without confirmation of its relapse by special studies. These patients require follow-up.

Toupet fundoplication to prevent progression of scleroderma-associated interstitial lung damage: a study protocol

Summary Background Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune and multiorgan disorder. Hallmarks of the disease include inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and dysregulation of fibroblasts leading to fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. The esophagus is often involved, with up to 80% of patients developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Reflux can be associated with hiatal hernia and several complications such as erosive esophagitis, peptic stricture, Barrett’s esophagus, aspiration pneumonia, and chronic microaspiration. Silent aspiration can lead to interstitial lung disease (ILD) in up to 50% of patients with scleroderma and accounts for up to 40% of mortality. Treatment of GERD in patients with SSc is challenging. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been shown effective in relieving typical GERD symptoms, but up to 40% of patients are non-responders. Various antireflux surgical procedures have been proposed to treat GERD and to modify the natural course of the disease by preventing lung damage in these patients. However, current algorithms consider only the degree of esophageal dilation as a marker of disease severity/progression, and results of antireflux surgery remain controversial. Methods We propose a feasibility, observational, multicenter, single-arm trial including adult patients diagnosed with SSc. Criteria for inclusion are individuals with GERD symptoms refractory to PPI, absence of peptic stricture at baseline endoscopy, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan showing no or less than 10% lung fibrosis, forced vital capacity at least 40% of the predicted value, and diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide 30–89% of the predicted value. A laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication according to the Toupet technique will be performed. Primary study outcome is the efficacy of fundoplication to reduce reflux exposure measured with a pH-impedance study or 4‑day wireless pH recording. Secondary outcomes include endoscopic, HRCT, and respiratory function tests findings as well as quality of life at 12-month follow-up. Conclusions The expected reduction of reflux burden in SSc patients selected for Toupet fundoplication may improve GERD symptoms/complications, pulmonary function, and quality of life, and may be associated with a reduced risk for lung transplant.

Beneficial Effect of Heat-Killed Lactic Acid Bacterium Lactobacillus johnsonii No. 1088 on Temporal Gastroesophageal Reflux-Related Symptoms in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study was conducted to examine the effects of ingesting a heat-killed lactic acid bacterium, Lactobacillus johnsonii No. 1088 (LJ88) on temporal gastroesophageal reflux-related symptoms in healthy volunteers. A total of 120 healthy Japanese volunteers of both sexes, aged between 21 and 63 years, whose Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (FSSG) total score was 8 or greater, but who were not diagnosed with functional dyspepsia according to the Rome IV classification, were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to either the LJ88 or placebo group and instructed to ingest the test food (1 billion heat-killed LJ88 or placebo) once a day for six weeks. Gastroesophageal reflux-related symptoms were evaluated using FSSG scores as a primary endpoint. The Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS), stomach state questionnaire, and serum gastrin concentration were used as secondary endpoints. In the FSSG evaluation, the heartburn score was significantly improved at 6 weeks in the LJ88 group compared to the placebo group. No severe adverse events related to the test food were observed. In conclusion, daily ingestion of heat-killed LJ88 improved temporal heartburn symptoms in non-diseased individuals.

How reliable is pre-sleeve endoscopy to characterize pathological features?

BackgroundVertical sleeve gastrectomy is a relatively new bariatric procedure with lower morbidity and mortality than other weight loss surgeries. The predictive values of preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy for detecting histopathological abnormalities prior to sleeve gastrectomy have not been clearly described. This study aimed to determine the negative predictive value of preoperative endoscopic biopsies for detecting Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and other pathological findings. MethodsThis cross-sectional study examined 102 patients who underwent vertical sleeve gastrectomy from January 2023 to November 2023. Preoperative histopathology of esophagogastroduodenoscopy specimens was compared to postoperative ones for H. pylori infection, gastritis, atrophy, and metaplasia. Moreover, gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms were postoperatively followed for 6 months. ResultsThe negative predictive value of preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy for detecting H. pylori infection, gastritis, metaplasia and atrophy were 95 %, 79 %, 93 %, and 98 %, respectively. In an overall view, for all pathologies, the negative predictive value was 53.4 %. Moderate gastritis and focal metaplasia were significantly underdiagnosed preoperatively (p < 0.001). H. pylori infection and focal metaplasia were significantly more prevalent in females after surgery (p < 0.001). H. pylori infection and gastritis were positively correlated with increased postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (p < 0.001). ConclusionPreoperative endoscopy has a high negative predictive value for detecting H. pylori infection, atrophy, and metaplasia but has suboptimal values for gastritis.

The Public's Intended Uptake of Hypothetical Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Screening Scenarios: A Nationwide Survey.

Screening for early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) may potentially reduce EAC-related mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to examine the Dutch population's intended uptake of 3 hypothetical EAC screening test scenarios and preferences for potential future organization. A total of 8,350 Dutch individuals aged 45-75 years were invited, of whom 2,258 completed a web-based survey. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 hypothetical screening test scenarios (i.e., transnasal endoscopy, ingestible cell collection device, or breath analysis). The primary outcome was intended uptake. Secondary outcomes included acceptance of screening eligibility criteria and preferences regarding invitation, counseling, and diagnostic follow-up. We performed exploratory univariable and multivariable regression analyses to assess which determinants were associated with EAC screening intent. Intended uptake of screening was highest in the breath analysis scenario (95%), followed by conventional upper endoscopy (78%), an ingestible cell collection device (75%), and transnasal endoscopy (68%) ( P < 0.001). Anticipating discomfort was most strongly associated with decreased intention to undergo transnasal endoscopy (odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.29) or swallow a cell collection device (odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.32). Cancer worry and high acceptance of test sensitivity/specificity were consistently associated with a positive intention to participate in screening. Inviting persons for screening based on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, age, or the output of a risk prediction model was acceptable to 74%, 69%, and 66%, respectively. Inviting only men was acceptable for only 41% of women. The majority (58%) preferred to be invited by a public health organization, and 32% of the participants preferred to discuss their decision to participate with a healthcare professional. Participants in this study self-selected through a web-based survey, potentially introducing selection bias. Participants generally intended to participate in EAC screening, although the level of intent depended on the discomfort and performance associated with the offered screening test. Determining eligibility based on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, age, or a risk calculator, but not sex, would be acceptable to most individuals.

Differences Between Patients with Heartburn Refractory to Vonoprazan and Those Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors

BackgroundVonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, demonstrates more potent acid inhibition than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of vonoprazan in patients with unproven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by comparing patients with vonoprazan-refractory heartburn with those with PPI-refractory heartburn.MethodsThis study included 104 consecutive patients with vonoprazan- or PPI-refractory heartburn (52 patients each), no erosive esophagitis on endoscopy and who underwent combined multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII–pH) testing with vonoprazan/PPI discontinuation. Patients’ backgrounds, symptom scores from four questionnaires, MII–pH results and high-resolution manometry results were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe vonoprazan group demonstrated significantly higher GERD symptoms and scores of abdominal pain and diarrhea on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire. MII–pH results revealed that the vonoprazan group demonstrated 40.4%, 17.3%, and 42.3% and the PPIs group exhibited 26.9%, 17.3%, and 55.8% of abnormal acid reflux [true non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)], reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn, respectively. The vonoprazan group demonstrated higher true NERD rates but with no significant difference (p = 0.307). Among the vonoprazan group, eight patients with true NERD underwent another MII–pH test on vonoprazan, and all cases demonstrated normal acid exposure times (0.0% [0.0–0.3]).ConclusionPatients with unproven GERD with vonoprazan-refractory heartburn demonstrated more symptoms, including not only GERD symptoms but also functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, than those with PPI-refractory heartburn.

Revisional one-anastomosis gastric bypass for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

The study aimed to evaluate the mid-term weight loss outcomes and complications of revisional one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) following failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A total of 586 patients underwent LSG from January 2010 to February 2018. Revisional OAGB (rOAGB) was performed in 22 (3.8%) patients. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 20 patients with at least 12months of follow-up after the revisional OAGB was carried out. The indications for revisional surgery were as follows: insufficient weight loss-4 (20%), weight regain-13 (65%), weight regain and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-2 (10%), and dysphagia with gastroesophageal reflux-1 (5%). The mean interval between the LSG and rOAGB was 35.3 ± 15.4months (range 4-64). The mean follow-up time after rOAGB was 45.5 ± 17.1months (range 12-54). At the end of the follow-up after rOAGB, %TWL was 26.4 ± 8.9%, and %EWL was 58.5 ± 21.6%, based on pre-LSG body weight. In all three patients with intractable GERD, the clinical symptoms of reflux retreated after revisional OAGB. The overall complication rate was 20%. In conclusion, the main indications for revision after LSG are weight regain, insufficient weight loss, and intractable GERD. Revisional OAGB emerges as a viable surgical alternative for unsuccessful LSG, presenting notable weight loss outcomes; however, it may be linked to an increased incidence of complications.

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Objectives To determine the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and associated factors. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in different regions around the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between 2022 and 2023. The questionnaire was distributed among patients who underwent LSG at different periods, ranging from six months to more than two years. The questionnaire comprised a risk factor assessment and the GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. Results A total of 387 participants with a mean age of 35.7±10.95 were included. The study included 225 females (58.1%) and 162 males (41.9%). The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 44.36±8.07 kg/m2, which decreased to 28.78±6.31 kg/m2 postoperatively. Notably, dissatisfaction with general health surged from 17 (24.6%) preoperatively to 165 (42.6%) postoperatively. Despite no significant difference in GERD-HRQL scores in the group who had preoperative symptoms,282 (72.9%) reported experiencing heartburn, and 289 (74.7%) reported bloatingpostoperatively. Postoperatively, 203 (52.5%) reported improved quality of life. Moreover, changes in BMI were strongly correlated with heartburn, dysphagia, odynophagia, and bloating. The postoperative prevalence of GERD was 355 (91.7%), with 318 (82.2%) of participants reporting new-onset symptoms. Sex (P=0.013), age (P=0.024), and hypercholesterolemia (P=0.046) were significantly associated with postoperative GERD severity. Conclusions The majority of participants developed GERD symptoms following surgery, with a significant proportion reporting new-onset symptoms. Sex, age, and hypercholesterolemia have emerged as significant factors for postoperative GERD severity.

Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: impact on reflux and weight loss

BackgroundSleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most commonly performed weight loss operation, and its 2 most common complications are postoperative reflux and weight recurrence. There is limited evidence to guide decision-making in treating these conditions. ObjectivesTo determine the efficacy of conversion of SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for GERD management and weight loss. SettingForty-one hospitals in Michigan. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study examining patients who underwent conversion of SG to RYGB from 2014 to 2022. The primary outcomes were changes in GERD-HRQL scores, anti-reflux medication use, and weight from baseline to 1 year after conversion. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications and resource utilization. ResultsAmong 2133 patients undergoing conversion, 279 (13%) patients had baseline and 1-year GERD-HRQL survey data and anti-reflux medication data. GERD-HRQL scores decreased significantly from 24.6 to 6.6 (P < .01). Among these, 207 patients (74%) required anti-reflux medication at baseline, with only 76 patients (27%) requiring anti-reflux medication at 1 year postoperatively (P < .01). Of the 380 patients (18%) with weight loss data, mean weight decreased by 68.4lbs, with a 24.3% decline in total body weight and 51.5% decline in excess body weight. In terms of 30-day complications, 308 (14%) patients experienced any complication and 89 (4%) experienced a serious complication, but there were no leaks, perforations, or deaths. Three-hundred and fifty-five (17%) patients presented to the emergency department and 64 (3%) patients underwent reoperation. ConclusionsThis study represents the largest reported experience with conversion from SG to RYGB. We found that conversion to RYGB is associated with significant improvement in GERD symptoms, reduction in anti-reflux medication use, and significant weight loss and is therefore an effective treatment for GERD and weight regain after SG. However, the risks and benefits of conversion surgery should be carefully considered, especially in patients with significant comorbidity burden.