COVID-19 Symptoms Research Articles

A Practical Approach to Tailor the Term Long COVID for Diagnostics, Therapy and Epidemiological Research for Improved Long COVID Patient Care.

The term long COVID (LC) effectively describes the broad long-term disease burden of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections, encompassing individual suffering and significant socioeconomic impacts. However, its general use hampers precise epidemiological research, diagnostics and therapeutic strategies. Misinterpretations occur, for example, when population surveys are compared to studies using health record data, because both refer to these data as LC. This also emphasizes the need for different terminology. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) rapid guideline differentiates ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 from post-COVID conditions, yet real-world observations challenge these two subgroup definitions. We propose refining the term LC into three subgroups: ongoing symptomatic COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 induced or exacerbated diseases and post-acute COVID condition. This stratification aids targeted diagnostics, treatment and epidemiological research. Subgroup-specific documentation using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes ensures accurate tracking and understanding of long-term effects. The subgroup of post-acute COVID condition again includes various symptoms, syndromes and diseases like post-exertional malaise (PEM), dysautonomia or cognitive dysfunctions. In this regard, differentiation, especially considering PEM, is crucial for effective diagnostics and treatment.

Recent advances in COVID-19-induced liver injury: causes, diagnosis, and management.

Since the start of the pandemic, considerable advancements have been made in our understanding of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the associated COVID-19 on the hepatic system. There is a broad range of clinical symptoms for COVID-19. It affects multiple systems and has a dominant lung illness depending on complications. The progression of COVID-19 in people with pre-existing chronic liver disease (CLD) has also been studied in large multinational groups. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a higher risk of hepatic decompensation and death in patients with cirrhosis. In this review, the source, composition, mechanisms, transmission characteristics, clinical characteristics, therapy, and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 were clarified and discussed, as well as the evolution and variations of the virus. This review briefly discusses the causes and effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with CLD. As part of COVID-19, In addition, we assess the potential of liver biochemistry as a diagnostic tool examine the data on direct viral infection of liver cells, and investigate potential pathways driving SARS-CoV-2-related liver damage. Finally, we explore how the pandemic has had a significant impact on patient behaviors and hepatology services, which may increase the prevalence and severity of liver disease in the future. The topics encompassed in this review encompass the intricate relationships between SARS-CoV-2, liver health, and broader health management strategies, providing valuable insights for both current clinical practice and future research directions.

Underreporting of Cases in the COVID-19 Outbreak of Borriana (Spain) during Mass Gathering Events in March 2020: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Determining the number of cases of an epidemic is the first function of epidemiological surveillance. An important underreporting of cases was observed in many locations during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. To estimate this underreporting in the COVID-19 outbreak of Borriana (Valencia Community, Spain) in March 2020, a cross-sectional study was performed in June 2020 querying the public health register. Logistic regression models were used. Of a total of 468 symptomatic COVID-19 cases diagnosed in the outbreak through anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology, 36 cases were reported (7.7%), resulting in an underreporting proportion of 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.5-94.6%), with 13 unreported cases for every reported case. Only positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction cases were predominantly reported due to a limited testing capacity and following a national protocol. Significant factors associated with underreporting included no medical assistance for COVID-19 disease, with an adjusted odds ratio [aOR] of 10.83 (95% CI 2.49-47.11); no chronic illness, aOR = 2.81 (95% CI 1.28-6.17); middle and lower social classes, aOR = 3.12 (95% CI 1.42-6.85); younger age, aOR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.99); and a shorter duration of illness, aOR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99). To improve the surveillance of future epidemics, new approaches are recommended.

Wearable Masks Integrated with Conducting Polymer and Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for VOC and Breath Monitoring

There has been considerable effort to develop wearable electronics from life-supporting devices for solders to fashion accessories such as smartwatches. The research of gas sensors has also attempted to adapt wearables with the power of nanotechnology. On the wearable platform, miniature gas sensors will provide real-time information about the atmosphere to protect each personnel from possible hazardous chemical attacks. In addition, wearable gas sensors can be facilitated to monitor human’s breath as medical applications. [1] Continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in real-time can act as a crucial benchmark for non-invasively detecting cardiac or arterial vascular function. Anomalies in respiratory rate serve as a significant indicator of a patient's health deterioration. Furthermore, it has been reported that aberrations in respiratory rate, as a physiological parameter, can be utilized to monitor common COVID-19 symptoms [2]. The analysis of breath through identifying biomarkers in exhaled breath proves to be an effective method for assessing metabolic disorders or dysfunctions in the human body. Conducting polymers (CPs) have generated significant interest in constructing flexible gas sensors. The inherent issue with pure CPs lies in their tendency to deprotonate in the presence of air, leading to a notable decline in long-term stability. Furthermore, limited gas response on diverse gaseous species demands the exploration of hybridizing CPs and other nanomaterials. When nanomaterials are hybridized with CPs, a synergistic effect, which comes from the benefits of each material, can improve sensing performance.In this study, polyaniline (PANI) conducting polymer and carbon-based nanomaterials, including carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, or MXene were synthesized in a composite form and deposited into disposable masks. The developed gas sensor demonstrates remarkable stability attributed to the presence of van der Waals forces and π–π interactions between carbon-based nanomaterials and polyaniline (PANI). This stability is crucial for its reliable performance over time. The sensor's sensitivity is notably improved due to enhanced charge transfer channels and a porous structure that facilitates the adsorption of target gas. Additionally, the composite sensors detect breathing patterns in real-time, which demonstrates noninvasive human breath monitoring. A noteworthy aspect is that a significant portion of breath signals originates from the presence of target gases and moisture in exhaled breath. Although volatile sulfur compounds, CO2, and volatile organic compounds in the exhaled breath have a minimal influence on the sensing signals, the sensor remains highly responsive to the key components, particularly target gas by selecting carbon-based nanomaterials [3, 4]. The proposed gas sensing mechanism of the CP-based composites is discussed.

BCG vaccination of healthcare workers for protection against COVID-19: 12-month outcomes from an international randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesBacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine has immunomodulatory effects that may provide protection against unrelated infectious diseases. We aimed to determine whether BCG vaccination protects adults against COVID-19. DesignPhase III double blind randomised controlled trial. SettingHealthcare centres in Australia, Brazil, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants3988 healthcare workers with no prior COVID-19 and no contraindication to BCG. InterventionRandomised 1:1 using a web-based procedure to receive a single 0.1mL intradermal dose of BCG-Denmark (BCG group, n=1999) or saline (placebo group, n=1989). Main outcome measuresDifference in incidence of (i) symptomatic and (ii) severe COVID-19 during the 12-months following randomisation in the modified intention to treat (mITT) population (confirmed SARS-CoV-2 naïve at inclusion). ResultsOf the 3988 participants randomised, 3386 had a negative baseline SARS-CoV-2 test and were included in the mITT population. The 12-month adjusted estimated risk of symptomatic COVID-19 was higher in the BCG group (22.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 20.6% to 24.5%) compared with the placebo group (19.6%; 95%CI 17.6% to 21.5%); adjusted difference +3.0 percentage points (95%CI 0.2% to 5.8%; p=0.04). The 12-month adjusted estimated risk of severe COVID-19 (mainly comprising those reporting being unable to work for ≥3 consecutive days) was 11.0% in the BCG group (95%CI 9.5% to 12.4%) compared with 9.6% in the placebo group (95%CI 8.3% to 11.1%); adjusted difference +1.3 percentage points (95%CI -0.7% to 3.3%, p=0.2). Breakthrough COVID-19 (post COVID-19 vaccination), and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections were similar in the two groups. There were 18 hospitalisations due to COVID-19 (11 in BCG group, 7 in placebo group; adjusted hazard ratio 1.56, 95%CI 0.60 to 4.02, p=0.4) and two deaths due to COVID-19, both in the placebo group. ConclusionsCompared to placebo, vaccination with BCG-Denmark increased the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 over 12 months among health care workers and did not decrease the risk of severe COVID-19 or post-vaccination breakthrough COVID-19. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04327206.

The Significance of Endothelial Dysfunction in Long COVID-19 for the Possible Future Pandemic of Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Disease.

Various symptoms have been reported to persist beyond the acute phase of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which is referred to as long coronavirus disease 19 (long COVID-19). Over 65 million individuals suffer from long COVID-19. However, the causes of long COVID-19 are largely unknown. Since long COVID-19 symptoms are observed throughout the body, vascular endothelial dysfunction is a strong candidate explaining the induction of long COVID-19. The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2, is ubiquitously expressed in endothelial cells. We previously found that the risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and a history of ASCVD raise the risk of severe COVID-19, suggesting a contribution of pre-existing endothelial dysfunction to severe COVID-19. Here, we show a significant association of endothelial dysfunction with the development of long COVID-19 and show that biomarkers for endothelial dysfunction in patients with long COVID-19 are also crucial players in the development of ASCVD. We consider the influence of long COVID-19 on the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ASCVD. Future assessments of the outcomes of long COVID-19 in patients resulting from therapeutic interventions that improve endothelial function may imply the significance of endothelial dysfunction in the development of long COVID-19.

Exploring the prevalence and chest CT predictors of Long COVID in children: a comprehensive study from Shanghai and Linyi.

COVID-19 constitutes a pandemic of significant detriment to human health. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Long COVID following SARS-CoV-2 infection, analyze the potential predictors of chest CT for the development of Long COVID in children. A cohort of children who visited the respiratory outpatient clinics at Shanghai Children's Medical Center or Linyi Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from December 2022 to February 2023 and underwent chest CT scans within 1 week was followed up. Data on clinical characteristics, Long COVID symptoms, and chest CT manifestations were collected and analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression models and decision tree models were employed to identify factors associated with Long COVID. A total of 416 children were included in the study. Among 277 children who completed the follow-up, the prevalence of Long COVID was 23.1%. Chronic cough, fatigue, brain fog, and post-exertional malaise were the most commonly reported symptoms. In the decision tree model for Long COVID, the presence of increased vascular markings, the absence of normal CT findings, and younger age were identified as predictors associated with a higher likelihood of developing Long COVID in children. However, no significant correlation was found between chest CT abnormality and the occurrence of Long COVID. Long COVID in children presents a complex challenge with a significant prevalence rate of 23.1%. Chest CT scans of children post-SARS-CoV-2 infection, identified as abnormal with increased vascular markings, indicate a higher risk of developing Long COVID.

Impact of COVID-19 on adverse reactions to subcutaneous specific immunotherapy in children:a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundCOVID-19 is a new infectious disease. To investigate whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection increases the adverse reactions of subcutaneous specific immunotherapy (SCIT) in children.MethodsThis study was conducted by collecting relevant data from children who underwent house dust mite SCIT from April 3, 2021, to March 18, 2023, including information on the time of COVID-19 infection, symptoms, and adverse reactions after each allergen injection. A mixed effects model was used to analyze the changes in adverse reactions before and after the COVID-19 infection.ResultsAmong the records of adverse reactions from 2658 injections in 123 children who underwent SCIT, the overall adverse reaction rate before COVID-19 infection was 39.8% and 30.0% after COVID-19 infection. Compared with pre-infection with COVID-19, the risks of overall adverse reactions, local adverse reactions, and systemic adverse reactions of immunotherapy after COVID-19 infection were reduced (odds ratio [OR] = 0.24, 0.31, and 0.28, all P < 0.05). Among the local adverse reactions, the incidence of the unvaccinated group was the highest (15.3% vs. 7.1%). The incidence of overall and local adverse reactions to SCIT decreased in 2-vaccinated COVID-19 recipients (OR = 0.29–0.31, P < 0.05).ConclusionsIn children, SARS-CoV-2 infection does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions to SCIT. This finding can provide a basis for the implementation of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Clinical-epidemiological characterization of patients with long COVID in Mexico.

Long COVID is defined as the persistence of COVID-19 symptoms four weeks after having undergone acute infection, according to the most recent CDC definition. It is estimated that there are 65 million people affected by this entity, although other figures speak of 200 million. To characterize the population affected by long COVID in Mexico. Patients older than 18 years who agreed to answer an online survey and who met the criteria for long COVID were included. Data from 203 subjects were included, with 138 (68.0%) being found to be females, and average age to be 41.8 years; 29.6% had severe disease, and 70.4%, mild to moderate disease; 89.7% had received prior COVID-19 vaccination: 6.9% had received one dose; 31.5%, two doses; and 51.2%, three or more doses. The main risk factors were diabetes, overweight or obesity, and hypertension. The most commonly reported symptom was fatigue, followed by other neuropsychiatric manifestations. It is important for the population affected by long COVID to be characterized in order to generate diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Too much focus on your health might be bad for your health: Reddit user's communication style predicts their Long COVID likelihood.

Long Covid is a chronic disease that affects more than 65 million people worldwide, characterized by a wide range of persistent symptoms following a Covid-19 infection. Previous studies have investigated potential risk factors contributing to elevated vulnerability to Long Covid. However, research on the social traits associated with affected patients is scarce. This study introduces an innovative methodological approach that allows us to extract valuable insights directly from patients' voices. By analyzing written texts shared on social media platforms, we aim to collect information on the psychological aspects of people who report experiencing Long Covid. In particular, we collect texts of patients they wrote BEFORE they were afflicted with Long Covid. We examined the differences in communication style, sentiment, language complexity, and psychological factors of natural language use among the profiles of 6.107 Reddit users, distinguishing between those who claim they have never contracted Covid -19, those who claim to have had it, and those who claim to have experienced Long Covid symptoms. Our findings reveal that people in the Long Covid group frequently discussed health-related topics before the pandemic, indicating a greater focus on health-related concerns. Furthermore, they exhibited a more limited network of connections, lower linguistic complexity, and a greater propensity to employ emotionally charged expressions than the other groups. Using social media data, we can provide a unique opportunity to explore potential risk factors associated with Long Covid, starting from the patient's perspective.

Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of CoronaVac® in children and adolescents aged 6 months to 17 years: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial

Safe and effective vaccines against COVID-19 for children and adolescents are needed. This international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial assessed the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of CoronaVac® in children and adolescents (NCT04992260). The study was carried out in Chile, South Africa, Malaysia, and the Philippines. The enrollment ran from September 10, 2021 to March 25, 2022. For efficacy assessment, the median follow-up duration from 14 days after the second dose was 169 days. A total of 11,349 subjects were enrolled. Two 3-μg injections of CoronaVac® or placebo were given 28 days apart. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of the CoronaVac®. The secondary endpoints were the immunogenicity and safety. The vaccine efficacy was 21.02% (95% CI: 1.65, 36.67). The level of neutralizing antibody in the vaccine group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (GMT: 390.80 vs. 62.20, P <0.0001). Most adverse reactions were mild or moderate. All the severe adverse events were determined to be unrelated to the investigational products. In conclusion, in the Omicron-dominate period, a two-dose schedule of 3 μg CoronaVac® was found to be safe and immunogenic, and showed potential against symptomatic COVID-19 in healthy children and adolescents.

Somatosensory processing in long COVID fatigue and its relations with physiological and psychological factors.

Fatigue is prevalent amongst people with long COVID, but is poorly understood. The sensory attenuation framework proposes that impairments in sensory processing lead to heightened perception of effort, driving fatigue. This study aims to investigate the role of somatosensory processing impairments in long COVID fatigue and quantify how sensory processing relates to other prominent symptoms of long COVID including autonomic dysfunction, mood and illness beliefs in driving the experience of fatigue. We will recruit 44 individuals with long COVID fatigue and 44 individuals with neither long COVID nor fatigue (controls). Our primary objective is to compare baseline somatosensory processing between individuals with long COVID fatigue and controls. Additionally, we will explore the associations between somatosensory processing, fatigability and the level of fatigue induced by cognitive and physical exertion. Due to the complex nature of fatigue, we will also investigate how long COVID, state fatigue, perceived effort, mood, illness beliefs, autonomic symptoms and autonomic nervous system function interact to predict trait fatigue. This comprehensive investigation aims to elucidate how sensory processing and other prominent symptoms interact to impact the experience of fatigue.

Use of Homeopathy in Patients Suffering from Long COVID-19 (LONGCOVIHOM): A Case Series

In some patients, coronavirus (COVID-19) can cause symptoms that last weeks or even months after the infection has gone. Long COVID-19 was defined as a confirmed initial COVID-19 infection, the presence of signs and symptoms more than four weeks after initial infection, and the persistence or appearance of signs and symptoms that another condition cannot explain and did not exist before infection. This study aimed to describe the effect of adjunctive individualized homeopathic treatment delivered to Long COVID-19 patients with previously confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Fifteen female consecutive patients with Long COVID-19 were documented. The mean age was 48.5 ± 13.5 (SD) years. The symptoms of Long COVID-19 were diverse. None of the patients showed identical symptoms. All but one patient, hence 93.3%, experienced a timely improvement to complete healing after individualized homeopathic treatment, characterized by modified Naranjo criteria of at least 8 points. The average time until improvement/remission was 47.6 ± 34.6 days, and the median was 37 days. Our observations suggest that adjunctive individualized homeopathic treatment might be considered for patients suffering from Long COVID-19 even with severe long-term sequelae of COVID-19.

Examining the Correlation between Serum Folate Levels and Disease Severity in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19

Background and Objective: Extensive research is underway to find effective treatments for clinical manifestations of COVID-19. Given the proven effectiveness of certain micronutrients, such as vitamins, in antimicrobial activity and immune system modulation for treating or preventing infectious diseases, the potential role of vitamins in the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 should be considered. The present study aimed to assess the correlation between serum folate levels in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and the severity of the disease, emphasizing the importance of relevant awareness regarding different folate levels. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, folate levels were measured in 117 COVID-19-infected patients hospitalized from January 2020 to November 2020 at Sina Hospital, Hamadan. Patients were categorized based on disease severity into three groups: mild to moderate, severe, and critical. Group differences were statistically analyzed using appropriate tests. Results: Our study revealed a statistically significant difference in folate levels among the three examined groups. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that for every one microgram per milliliter increase in folate, the probability of severe COVID-19 symptoms decreased by 23%. The large area under the ROC curve (0.864) indicates that mortality in COVID-19 patients can be well predicted based on folate levels. Conclusion: As evidenced by the obtained results, it can be stated that a reduction in serum folate levels among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is common and is recognized as a predictive factor for COVID-19-related mortality. Consequently, monitoring folate levels and considering supplementation, if necessary, should be considered for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

The Silent Syndrome of Long COVID and Gaps in Scientific Knowledge: A Narrative Review.

COVID-19 is still a major public health concern, mainly due to the persistence of symptoms or the appearance of new symptoms. To date, more than 200 symptoms of long COVID (LC) have been described. The present review describes and maps its relevant clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and genetic and nongenetic risk factors. Given the currently available evidence on LC, we demonstrate that there are still gaps and controversies in the diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and detection of prognostic and predictive factors, as well as the role of the viral strain and vaccination.

Does the Fear of COVID-19 Impact on Menopausal Symptoms in Women? A Research Investigation.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the relationship between the fear of COVID-19 and menopausal symptoms in women during the menopausal period. Methods: This study is a descriptive cross-sectional study. This study was completed with a total of 161 women who met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected face-to-face using the Personnel Information Form, Menopause Symptom Assessment Scale, and Coronavirus 19 Phobia Scale. Results: There is a slightly positive relationship between the social subscale of the COVID-19 fear scale and the somatic subscale of the menopause symptoms scale. There is a slightly positive relationship between the economic subscale of the COVID-19 scale and the psychological subscale of the menopausal symptoms scale. There is a slightly positive correlation between the total score of the total COVID-19 phobia scale and the somatic and psychological subscales of the menopause symptoms assessment scale. However, there is no significant relationship between the total score of the COVID-19 phobia scale and the total score and urological subscale of the menopause symptoms assessment scale. Conclusions: It has been determined that fear of COVID-19 is slightly positively associated with somatic and psychological complaints in menopausal women.

Obesity and age are transmission risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection among exposed individuals.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has occurred in Massachusetts in multiple waves led by a series of emerging variants. While the evidence has linked obesity with severe symptoms of COVID-19, the effect of obesity on susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear. Identification of intrinsic factors, which increase the likelihood of exposed individuals succumbing to productive SARS-CoV-2 infection could help plan mitigation efforts to curb the illness. We aim to investigate whether obese individuals have a higher susceptibility to developing productive SARS-CoV-2 infection given comparable exposure to nonobese individuals. This case-control study leveraged data from the Mass General Brigham's (MGB) electronic medical records (EMR), containing 687,813 patients, to determine whether obesity at any age increases the proportion of infections. We used PCR results of 72,613 subjects who tested positive to SARS-CoV-2 or declared exposure to the virus independently of the result of the test. For this study, we defined susceptibility as the likelihood of testing positive upon suspected exposure. We demonstrate evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exposed obese individuals were more prone to become COVID positive than nonobese individuals [adjusted odds ratio = 1.34 (95% CI: 1.29-1.39)]. Temporal analysis showed significantly increased susceptibility in obese individuals across the duration of the pandemic in Massachusetts. Obese exposed individuals are at a higher risk of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2. This indicates that obesity is not only a risk factor for worsened outcomes but also increases the risk for infection upon exposure. Identifying such populations early will be crucial for curbing the spread of this infectious disease.

Post COVID-19 persistent symptoms and functional status in COVID-19 survivors: a multi-center study

BackgroundPost COVID symptoms are a series of chronic symptoms that patients may experience after resolution of acute COVID-19. Different post-COVID-19 condition phenotypes might exist, although exact causes, management, and outcomes are not known.AimTo assess the functional status among post-COVID-19 survivors and identify the associated socio-demographic, clinical, and laboratory risk factors of the poor functional status among those cases and to identify the most common persistent symptoms among post-COVID-19 survivors after discharge. This was a cross-sectional study conducted on 150 recovered cases who had been infected with COVID-19 as confirmed by swab during hospitalization and being interviewed regarding functional status 6 months post-hospital discharge. Cases were divided into two groups: the decreased functional status group (n = 74) and the non-decreased functional status group (n = 76).ResultsThe present study indicated statistically significant differences between the studied groups; receiving the influenza vaccine was significantly associated with keeping the pre-COVID functional status (p = 0.02). The reduced functional status group had a significantly more severe disease course, prolonged hospital as well as ICU stay (p < 0.001), and worse CT findings than the normal functional status group (p = 0.004). Long-term symptoms such as headache, mood changes, insomnia, hearing problems, dry eyes, breathlessness, and chest tightness were significantly more prevalent among those who reported limitations in their functional status (p < 0.001). There were significantly higher CRP, serum ferritin, and D-dimer in the reduced functional status group.ConclusionThe present study highlights that most COVID-19 recovered cases have different degrees of functional limitations ranging from null to severe based on the PCFS scale. These limitations were affected by periodic influenza vaccination, ICU admission, and length of hospital stay. Some laboratory parameters were associated with reduced functionality: CRP, D-dimer, and serum ferritin. Psychological/neurological symptoms and breathlessness were significantly associated with reduced PCFS. This calls for public health action and necessitates widespread health education of post-COVID-19 health consequences.

Out of Sight, Out of Mind: reflections from the Covid era on social knowledge and medical thinking in Adolf Lukas Vischer’s ‘barbed wire disease’

ABSTRACT This article explores the relationship between wartime captivity and the production of medical knowledge through the phenomenon of ‘barbed wire disease’. This was a term used by First World War POWs and internees themselves to describe symptoms of depression and related neurological disorders. The Swiss surgeon Adolf Lukas Vischer borrowed it for the title of a book he wrote in 1918 suggesting that the spatial and temporal peculiarities of camp life made prolonged captivity in such an environment inhumane and a threat to future societal stability. The article argues that Vischer’s findings should be seen through the lens of historical time. His observations led him to draw attention to the contemporaneous plight of previously highly mobile and self-reliant migrants across the world now living for an unknown duration within the confines of the barbed wire. Yet equally, the article makes the case for thinking in a transhistorical way about the (often under-appreciated) mutual inter-dependence of social knowledge and medical thinking, especially in times of large-scale displacement. The shadow of the past, it will be suggested, continues to shape approaches to the mental health problems faced by people living in atypical temporal and spatial settings today, including those experiencing the symptoms of Long Covid and those held in immigration detention.

COVID-19 Frequency in Hospitalized Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review

Objective The COVID-19 pandemic affected individuals in different contexts (e.g. long-term care facilities, schools, communities), including psychiatric hospitals. Thus, the objective of this systematic review, duly registered and approved on PROSPERO (CRD42023427835), is to assess the frequency of positive COVID-19 cases among patients hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals. Methods A total of 4,922 articles were identified in the database searches, and 17 studies conducted in psychiatric hospitals from different regions of the world were selected. Results The frequency of positive COVID-19 cases among patients hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals ranged from 1.8% to 98.8%. Out of a total of 19,573 patients hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals, the pooled mean frequency of positive COVID-19 cases was 11.9%. The majority of patients presented COVID-19 symptoms (e.g. cough, fever and others). The COVID-19 diagnosis was primarily conducted through RT-PCR testing in 88.9% of the studies. Conclusion In conclusion, there is discrepancy in the methodology of the studies assessing the frequency of positive COVID-19 cases in psychiatric hospitals. However, this review allowed us to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the population hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals.