Symptomatic Parastomal Hernia Research Articles

Assessment of the quality of online patient information resources for patients considering parastomal hernia treatment.

The aim was to examine the quality of online patient information resources for patients considering parastomal hernia treatment. A Google search was conducted using lay search terms for patient facing sources on parastomal hernia. The quality of the content was assessed using the validated DISCERN instrument. Readability of written content was established using the Flesch-Kincaid score. Sources were also assessed against the essential content and process standards from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) framework for shared decision making support tools. Content analysis was also undertaken to explore what the sources covered and to identify any commonalities across the content. Fourteen sources were identified and assessed using the identified tools. The mean Flesch-Kincaid reading ease score was 43.61, suggesting that the information was difficult to read. The overall quality of the identified sources was low based on the pooled analysis of the DISCERN and Flesch-Kincaid scores, and when assessed against the criteria in the NICE standards framework for shared decision making tools. Content analysis identified eight categories encompassing 59 codes, which highlighted considerable variation between sources. The current information available to patients considering parastomal hernia treatment is of low quality and often does not contain enough information on treatment options for patients to be able to make an informed decision about the best treatment for them. There is a need for high-quality information, ideally co-produced with patients, to provide patients with the necessary information to allow them to make informed decisions about their treatment options when faced with a symptomatic parastomal hernia.

Full endoscopic minimally invasive extraperitoneal modified Sugarbaker approach for para-colostomy hernia repair: Technical aspects and 2-year follow-up results of a prospective cohort.

This study aimed to assess technical aspects and clinical results of a new minimally invasive technique in parastomal hernia (PSH) repair, full endoscopic retromuscular access, after 2 years of follow-up. Data from consecutive patients requiring minimally invasive ventral PSH repair were collected from 2019 to 2022. The inclusion criteria were patients aged between 18 and 80 years old with symptomatic PSH. Demographics and perioperative and postoperative data were collected. Postoperative pain and functional recovery were compared with preoperative data. Twelve patients with symptomatic PSH were included. The mean PSH defect area was 16.2 cm2 and the mean midline defect was 8.7 cm2 . No intra-operative complications or conversion to open surgery were detected. One patient (8%) required postoperative readmission due to partial bowel obstruction symptoms that required catheterization of the stoma. Pain significantly worsened after the first postoperative day compared to preoperative data but improved after the first postoperative month compared to the first postoperative week and after the 90th postoperative day compared to the first postoperative month, with significant differences. Significant restriction improvement was identified when 30 days after surgery data were compared to preoperative data and when the 180th postoperative day results were compared to 30 days after surgery. The average follow-up was 29 months. During the follow-up no clinical or radiological recurrence was observed. This paper shows low rate of intra- and postoperative complications with significant improvement in terms of pain activities restriction compared to preoperatory. After 29 months follow-up, no recurrence was identified, confirming that this approach offers good mid-term results.

Ventral incisional hernia and double parastomal hernia repair with retromuscular biosynthetic mesh using the SMART technique (Stapled Mesh Stoma Reinforcement Technique) after cancer-related pelvic exenteration

We report on the case of a 64-year-old man who underwent the SMART surgical technique using retromuscular biosynthetic mesh for parastomal hernia. This patient had a terminal colostomy and Bricker ileal conduit following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced low rectal adenocarcinoma. Since then, he had undergone a first median incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal biosynthetic mesh, followed a year later by the onset of a symptomatic parastomal hernia at the stoma sites and next to the median laparotomy scar. It was thus decided to perform a double parastomal hernia repair using the SMART technique with retromuscular biosynthetic mesh.

EDITORIAL COMMENT

Placement of prophylactic mesh at the time of ileal conduit urinary diversion is a controversial topic. On one hand, prophylactic parastomal hernia mesh has been found to decrease the rate of clinically detected parastomal hernia with no mesh complications in randomized studies 1 Liedberg F. Kollberg P. Allerbo M. et al. Preventing parastomal hernia after ileal conduit by the use of a prophylactic mesh: a randomised study. Eur Urol. 2020; 78: 757-763 Google Scholar and, as the current authors find, the approach has been found to be cost effective. 2 Saha S. Gerdtham U. Bläckberg M. Kollberg P. Liedberg F. Cost effectiveness of the use of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia after urinary diversion with an ileal conduit. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022; 40: 9-15 Google Scholar , 3 Kanabolo D.P.S. Park S. Prophylactic mesh placement with ileal conduit: a cost effectiveness analysis. Urology. 2023; (S0090-4295(23)00368-0)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.03.041 Google Scholar On the other hand, placement of prophylactic parastomal hernia mesh is not widely adopted in clinical practice. One reason for lack of adoption may be because the absolute rate of symptomatic parastomal hernia repairs that require surgical intervention is low because interventions are limited to cases with complications from the parastomal hernia such as bowel or conduit obstruction or skin breakdown from pouching challenges. Consequently, it is unclear how prophylactic mesh placement impacts the span of patient experience with parastomal hernia, which may range from asymptomatic to life threatening. Currently, no urologic studies incorporate patient-reported outcome measures regarding stoma satisfaction or impact on daily functioning, though efforts are underway to address this question in colorectal collaborative groups. 4 Blackwell S. Pinkney T. Quality of life and parastomal hernia repair: the PROPHER study. Hernia. 2020; 24: 429-430 Google Scholar As such, a key question remains unanswered in the urologic literature: Does prophylactic parastomal hernia mesh placement improve long-term patient quality of life and decrease the need for parastomal hernia repair?

V-005 Robot assisted parastomal hernia repair of an ileal conduit stoma

Abstract Aim The optimal surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary division has yet to be determined. Data is scarce and reported recurrence rates after different approaches in parastomal hernia repair remain high. Material & Methods A 65-year-old male patient, who had a history of a radical cystectomy with an ileal conduit urinary diversion, presented with a recurrent symptomatic parastomal hernia. He had a previous repair of his parastomal hernia via an open retromuscular approach with a unilateral posterior component separation (transversus abdominis release). Results A robot assisted repair of the recurrent parastomal hernia was performed using a partial intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique (PIPOM). Intraoperatively, intraluminal Indocyanine green (ICG) was used to identify the ileal conduit loop. A closure of the defect was performed with a barbed suture whereafter the repair was reinforced with a PVDF IPST ‘Chimney’ parastomal mesh. The latter being partially covered by peritoneum. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient went home on postoperative day one. The patient had no complications and a well-functioning ileal conduit stoma 6 weeks after surgery. Conclusions The repair of a recurrent parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary division represents a surgical challenge. After a previous retromuscular approach, a robotic assisted approach using a partial intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique (PIPOM) represents a feasible technique with promising results.

V-039 EXPANDED INDICATION FOR LAPAROSCOPIC INTRACORPOREAL RECTUS MUSCLE APONEUROPLASTY (LIRA) IN PARASTOMAL HERNIA

Abstract Aims Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) is a minimally invasive technique for the repair of incisional hernias from M2 to M4, but using the basic concepts of the technique, it allows an extended indication for other types of hernias such as suprapubic, lateral, or as in our case, the parastomal. The aim is to present step by step the larparoscopic aponeuroplasty technique as an alternative for parastomal hernia repair, as a modification of the original LIRA-technique. Material & Methods We present a 56-year-old patient with a history of abdominoperineal resection in 2012, who presented a symptomatic parastomal hernia. Clinical examination and computed tomography (CT) showed a partially reducible type I parastomal hernia, 8×11cm. Results We begin by releasing adhesions and reducing the hernial sac, always with control of the vascular axis, avoiding ischemic events. We opened the peritoneum and the transversus muscle 1–2 cm from the edge of the defect. We closed the defect using the transversus muscle as well as the posterior rectus sheath. We reduce the pneumoperitoneum to adapt the mesh and fix it using non-absorbable tackers and fibrin glue coating. Conclusions The LIRA technique guarantees a reconstruction of the midline, reinforcing this area without tension in ventral hernias. Based on this condition, we apply the concepts in a parastomal hernia, the original technique being equally reproducible, providing the advantages of laparoscopic surgery in terms of less pain. and morbidity, and betting on the minimization of tension compared to primary closure, as well as less appearance of seroma.

Autologous full-thickness skin graft as reinforcement in parastomal hernia repair: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundParastomal hernia is a common complication of an enterostomy and can have a significant impact on health-related quality of life. Currently used methods of repair have high recurrence rates and considerable risk for complications. We have developed a new technique for parastomal hernia repair that uses full-thickness skin graft as reinforcement.MethodsThis study protocol describes a multicentre randomised controlled trial on parastomal hernia repair comparing a new full-thickness skin graft technique with conventional synthetic composite mesh as reinforcement of the abdominal wall. Patients with a symptomatic parastomal hernia will be included and followed up at 3, 12 and 36 months, with surgical complication as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will be recurrence rate and health-related quality of life assessed with VHPQ, EORTC C30 and CR29. Tissue biology and collagen metabolism will be investigated pre- and postoperatively using biopsies of the abdominal wall fascia and blood samples.DiscussionParastomal hernia constitutes a major clinical problem where the prospects of a good result after hernia repair are presently poor. This new method of repair with full-thickness skin grafting could be a new alternative in our surgical toolbox, but before then, it must be evaluated properly.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03667287. Registered on September 12, 2018

Development of a Screening Measure for Symptomatic Parastomal Hernia: Assessing Clinically Relevant Endpoints In The CIPHER Study

Development of a Screening Measure for Symptomatic Parastomal Hernia: Assessing Clinically Relevant Endpoints In The CIPHER Study

Stoma-related symptoms in patients operated for rectal cancer with abdominoperineal excision.

The primary aim of this study was to characterize the frequency, severity, and distress of symptoms from the colostomy and colostomy acceptance in rectal cancer patients. The secondary aims were to study the symptomatic parastomal herniation, its relationship to stoma-related symptoms, and potential risk factors for the development of symptomatic parastomal herniation. Data was collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and from surgical charts. Patients operated for rectal cancer with an abdominoperineal excision in Sweden between 2007 and 2009 and alive 3 years postoperatively were contacted (n = 852). Patients who consented to participate, had a colostomy constructed during the abdominoperineal excision, and who answered a questionnaire 3 years postoperative were included (n = 495). Answers were analyzed with emphasis on stoma-related symptoms and their intensity as well as the level of distress associated with the symptoms. Almost 90% of patients did not feel limited in their daily life by their colostomy. Patients with symptomatic parastomal hernia had a 53% higher risk of flatulence. Fifty-six patients developed symptomatic parastomal hernia (11%). The only risk factor associated with the development of symptomatic parastomal hernia was high body mass index (BMI). This study shows that most patients do not feel limited by their stoma 3 years after surgery for rectal cancer. Symptomatic parastomal hernia was associated with high BMI but not with the surgical technique.

Single-port parastomal hernia repair by using 3-D textile implants.

Background:Parastomal hernias (PSHs) are a frequent complication and remain a surgical challenge. We present a new option for single-port PSH repair with equilateral stoma relocation using preshaped, prosthetic 3-dimensional implants and flat mesh insertion in intraperitoneal onlay placement for additional augmentation of the abdominal wall.Methods:We describe our novel technique in detail and performed an analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent single-port PSH repair, focusing on feasibility, conversions, and complications.Results:From September 2013 to January 2014, 9 patients with symptomatic PSHs were included. Two conversions to reduced-port laparoscopy using a second 3-mm trocar were required because of difficult adhesiolysis, dissection, and reduction of the hernia sac content. No major intra- or postoperative complications or reoperations were encountered. One patient incurred a peristomal wound healing defect that could be treated conservatively.Conclusion:We found that single-port PSH repair using preshaped, elastic 3-dimensional devices and additional flat mesh repair of the abdominal wall is feasible, safe, and beneficial, relating to optimal coverage of unstable stoma edges with wide overlap to all sides and simultaneous augmentation of the midline in the IPOM technique. The stoma relocation enables prolapse treatment and prevention. The features of a modular and rotatable multichannel port system offer benefits in clear dissection ongoing from a single port. Long-term follow-up data on an adequate number of patients are awaited to examine efficacy.

The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study

BackgroundParastomal hernia is a frequent complication of intestinal stomata. Mesh repair gives the best results, with the mesh inserted via laparotomy or laparoscopically. It was the aim of this retrospective multicenter study to determine the early and late results of the laparoscopically performed, modified Sugarbaker technique with ePTFE mesh.MethodsFrom 2005 to 2010, a total of 61 consecutive patients (mean age = 61 years), with a symptomatic parastomal hernia, underwent laparoscopic repair using the modified Sugarbaker technique with ePTFE mesh. Fifty-five patients had a colostomy, 4 patients an ileostomy, and 2 a urostomy according to Bricker. The records of the patients were reviewed with respect to patient characteristics, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. All patients underwent physical examination after a follow-up of at least 1 year to detect a recurrent hernia. Morbidity rate was 19 % and included wound infection (n = 1), ileus (n = 2), trocar site bleeding (n = 2), reintervention (n = 2), and pneumonia (n = 1). One patient died in the postoperative period due to metastasis of lung carcinoma that caused bowel obstruction. Concomitant incisional hernias were detected in 25 of 61 patients (41 %) and could be repaired at the same time in all cases. A recurrent hernia was found in three patients at physical examination, and in one patient an asymptomatic recurrence was found on a CT scan. The overall recurrence rate was 6.6 % after a mean follow-up of 26 months.ConclusionThe laparoscopic Sugarbaker technique is a safe procedure for repairing parastomal hernias. In our study, the overall morbidity was 19 % and the recurrence rate was 6.6 % after a mean follow-up of 26 months. Moreover, the laparoscopic approach revealed concomitant hernias in 41 % of the patients, which could be repaired successfully at the same time.

The Use of Human Acellular Dermal Matrix for Parastomal Hernia Repair in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Parastomal hernias occur frequently in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who require a stoma and are associated with high recurrence rates. The tissue weakness at the site of hernia can be overcome by creating neofascia using two separate layers of human acellular dermal matrix. Thirteen consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease with symptomatic parastomal hernia underwent open parastomal hernia repair at an academic tertiary referral center whereby the posterior and anterior rectus fascia at the stoma site was reconstructed with human acellular dermal matrix. Patients were followed prospectively for 290 +/- 119 days (mean +/- standard deviation), and data were reviewed for rate of postoperative complications, hernia recurrence, and patient satisfaction. Mean operative time was 233 +/- 80 (range, 129-355) minutes. No intraoperative complications occurred. Average hospital stay was 8.1 +/- 2.4 (range, 6-14) days. Postoperative complications included seroma formation, incisional separation (2 patients each, 15.4 percent), and superficial wound infection (1 patient, 7.7 percent). There were two cases of asymptomatic hernia recurrence as determined by computerized tomography. These patients did not require any intervention. Overall patient satisfaction with the procedure was high. In patients with parastomal hernia, reconstruction of the stoma site and abdominal wall with human acellular dermal matrix seems to be safe and results in high patient satisfaction.

Laparoscopic Repair of Parastomal Hernias: a Multi-Centre Retrospective review and Shift in Technique

Purpose: To describe the reasons for a shift in our technique of laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias towards repair with a non-slit mesh. Our initial results with repair using meshes with a keyhole had high recurrence rates. Methods: We performed a multi-centre retrospective study focusing on complications and recurrences. Data were gathered retrospectively from the medical records. The last follow-up date was the latest clinical examination by the surgeon. Recurrences were diagnosed clinically or by CT scan performed for oncological follow-up in cancer patients. Results: From September 2001 till May 2007, twenty-four patients with a symptomatic parastomal hernia were treated laparoscopically. No major intra-or postoperative complications were encountered. We had no conversions, no enterotomies and the overall postoperative morbidity was 8.4% (2/24). During a mean follow-up of 21.2 months, ten recurrences or 41.7% (10/24) have been diagnosed. In patients treated with a “keyhole technique” recurrence rate was 72.7% (8/11) with a mean follow-up of 30.7 months. In patients treated with a “modified Sugarbaker technique” recurrence rate was 15.4% (2/13) with a mean follow-up of 14.0 months.Conclusions: We found laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair could be performed with few complications. We abandoned the “keyhole techniques” because of a high recurrence rate. We currently use a “modified Sugarbaker technique” with promising early results.

Parastomal Hernia: Short-Term Outcome After Laparoscopic and Conventional Repairs

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes after laparoscopic and conventional parastomal hernia repairs. A retrospective review of parastomal hernia repairs was performed. Conventional repairs included primary suture repair, stoma relocation, and mesh repair. Laparoscopic repairs included the Sugarbaker and keyhole techniques. Forty-nine patients underwent repair of symptomatic parastomal hernias: 19 ileostomies, 13 colostomies, and 17 urostomies. Thirty patients underwent 39 conventional repairs. Nineteen patients underwent laparoscopic surgical repairs. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic repair (208 +/- 58 vs 162 +/- 114 minutes, P = .06). The mean length of stay was 6 days for both groups (P = .74). The mean follow-up was shorter in the laparoscopic group (20 vs 65 months, P < or = .001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of surgical site infections (11% laparoscopic vs 5% conventional, P = .60) or complication rates (63% laparoscopic vs 36% conventional, P = .67). Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is a feasible operation with similar short-term outcomes to conventional repairs.

Laparoscopic Repair of Parastomal Hernias: A Single Surgeon's Experience in 66 Patients

The repair of parastomal hernias represents a surgical problem with high complication and failure rates. A basic principle is the necessity of mesh-based techniques. The study was performed to evaluate a laparoscopic approach, primarily based on the intraperitoneal on lay mesh technique. Sixty-six patients with a symptomatic parastomal hernia were enrolled in the prospective study between November 1999 and February 2006. After complete adhesiolysis, the mesh was introduced to cover the fascial defect of the hernia and the original midline incision. In special cases, a two-mesh technique was used. First, an incised mesh was placed around the stoma sling. The second mesh was used to cover the abdominal wall with the first mesh; the stoma sling was placed between the two meshes for at least 5 cm. The two-mesh technique proved to be superior in terms of recurrence rate especially in cases with a lateral fascial defect. The laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias is a surgically challenging procedure with promising results when using the two-mesh technique. Therefore, two meshes should be used in all cases of parastomal hernias. Polyvinylidene fluoride was revealed to be the most suitable material for the sandwich repair in terms of possible ingrowth and infection resistance.

Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: early results.

Open repair of parastomal hernias is associated with high rates of morbidity and recurrence. Laparoscopic repair with mesh has been described, and good results have been reported in small case series with short-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to review our institution's experience with the laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias. Nine patients with symptomatic parastomal hernias (five ileal conduits, two ileostomies, and two sigmoid colostomies) underwent laparoscopic repair with mesh between April 1998 and September 2001. Demographics, operative details, postoperative complications, and hernia recurrences were recorded retroprospectively. All of the patients were men; their average age was 66 years (range, 53-77). A single piece of Gore-Tex Dual Mesh with a slit to accommodate the stoma was used in seven of nine repairs; in the other two patients, two pieces of mesh were used. Concurrent incisional hernias were repaired in three of nine patients (33.3%). The average operating time was 243 min (range, 136-360). The average postoperative length of stay was 4.7 days (range, 2-7). Immediate postoperative complications occurred in three patients (33.3%) (one ileus, one urinary retention, and one ulnar neuropathy). Recurrences developed in four patients (44.4%), and in one patient (11.1%) the stoma prolapsed; all of these failures occurred within 6 months of the operation. One patient died 10 months postoperatively, without evidence of hernia recurrence. Three patients are without evidence of recurrence after 18, 21, and 33 months (average, 24) of follow-up, respectively. In this series, laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia failed in 56% of patients, all within 6 months of the operation. Although the laparoscopic approach has potential advantages compared to the conventional open methods, the initial results are disappointing. Advances in the technique may improve the early results, and further prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy of this approach.