You have accessJournal of UrologyTransplantation & Vascular Surgery: Renal Transplantation & Vascular Surgery I1 Apr 2018PD25-03 ROBOTIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION WITH REGIONAL HYPOTHERMIA VERSUS OPEN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION FOR PATIENTS WITH END STAGE RENAL DISEASE: A TWO-ARM STUDY (IDEAL PHASE 2B) Akshay Sood, Rajesh Ahlawat, Wooju Jeong, Jacob Keeley, Firas Abdollah, Mahendra Bhandari, and Mani Menon Akshay SoodAkshay Sood More articles by this author , Rajesh AhlawatRajesh Ahlawat More articles by this author , Wooju JeongWooju Jeong More articles by this author , Jacob KeeleyJacob Keeley More articles by this author , Firas AbdollahFiras Abdollah More articles by this author , Mahendra BhandariMahendra Bhandari More articles by this author , and Mani MenonMani Menon More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1330AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To examine association between minimally invasive renal recipient surgery and meaningful postoperative outcomes including graft function, 6-month complications, and graft and patient survival. METHODS Patients with end stage renal disease undergoing living-donor renal transplantation either via open or robotic kidney transplantation were included in the study; inclusion/exclusion criteria have been previously published. Non-parsimonious propensity score methods were used to reduce baseline differences. Conditional and Cox regression models evaluated the association between robotic surgery and outcomes. Ding-VanderWeele method estimated the impact of unknown confounders on study findings. Primary outcome was delayed graft function (DGF), defined as need for dialysis within 1 week of surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, pain, graft rejection, and graft and patient survival. RESULTS Of the 654 patients that met study criteria during the 3-year study period (January 2013 to December 2015), 126 underwent robot-assisted kidney transplantation. Propensity score matching (1:3) yielded an overall sample of 504 patients (robotic, n=126; open, n=378). All patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Within the matched-pair cohort, the robotic approach was associated with lower rates of wound infections (0% vs 4%, chi-square p=0.023) and symptomatic lymphoceles (0% vs 7% [95% CI: 4.4 to 9.6%] at 36 months, log-rank p=0.003), as well as, reduced postoperative pain, requirement for narcotic analgesia and blood loss. There were no differences among the two groups, robotic versus open, with respect to graft function (DGF 0% vs 2.4%, chi-square p=0.081), length of hospital stay (median 8 days for both, Mann-Whitney p=0.647), graft rejection (16.2% [95% CI: 9 to 23.4%] vs 18.6% [95% CI: 12.4 to 24.6%] at 36 months, log-rank p=0.643), and graft (95.2% [95% CI: 86 to 99.3%] vs 96.3% [95% CI: 93.1 to 99.4%] at 36 months, log-rank p=0.266) and overall survival (94.5% [95% CI: 89.3 to 98.9%] vs 98.1% [95% CI: 96.7 to 99.5%] at 36 months, log-rank p=0.307). Ding-VanderWeele analysis suggested a minimal influence of unknown confounders on study findings. CONCLUSIONS Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia was associated with a lower rate of postoperative complications, and improved patient comfort. There were no differences with respect to graft function, and graft and overall survival. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e546-e547 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Akshay Sood More articles by this author Rajesh Ahlawat More articles by this author Wooju Jeong More articles by this author Jacob Keeley More articles by this author Firas Abdollah More articles by this author Mahendra Bhandari More articles by this author Mani Menon More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract