Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Research Articles

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) in patients with symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis (IVBS)

BackgroundApproximately 20% of all transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) and ischaemic strokes occur within the posterior circulation, with vertebrobasilar stenosis identified as the cause in roughly 25% of the cases. Studies...

Stenting versus medical treatment alone for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: a preplanned pooled individual patient data analysis

BackgroundWhether the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) is significantly different from that of medical treatment alone for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is debatable. A...

Enterprise stents for the treatment of symptomatic non-acute intracranial artery stenosis disease: safety and efficiency evaluation

ABSTRACT Background Enterprise stent was approved for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. However, it has been widely used in the endovascular treatment of intracranial artery stenosis, which is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of the Enterprise stent in the endovascular treatment of intracranial artery stenosis disease. Methods We conducted a retrospective case series of 107 patients with intracranial artery stenosis who received Enterprise stent implantation at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022. The rates of recanalization, perioperative complications, in-stent restenosis at 3–12 months and stroke recurrence were assessed for endovascular treatment. Results A total of 107 individuals were included in this study, 88 were followed up, and 19 (17.8%) patients were lost to follow-up. The operation success rate was 100%, During the procedure,4（3.7%）patients had vasospasm, and 2(1.9%) patients showed symptomatic bleeding. The overall perioperative complication rate was 5.6%, including 2.8% distal artery embolism, 0.9% in-stent thrombosis, and 1.9% symptomatic bleeding. 88 (82.2%) patients were followed up from 3 to 12 months, of whom 12 (13.6%) had in-stent restenosis, 4 (4.7%) recurrent strokes and 2 died of pulmonary infection caused by COVID-19. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the cerebral artery, including the middle cerebral artery group, internal carotid artery group, and vertebrobasilar artery group. Conclusions In this study, the placement of the Enterprise stent in patients with symptomatic non-acute intracranial stenosis was successful. However, the occurrence of periprocedural and long-term complications after stenting remains of high concern.

First-in-human experience of sirolimus coated balloon for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

BackgroundThe drug coated balloon is a promising endovascular therapy for intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS), potentially combining the advantages of primary angioplasty and antiproliferative drugs. Previous studies have focused on the paclitaxel...

A case report: new-onset nummular headache after stenting of the middle cerebral artery

BackgroundNummular headache (NH) is categorized as a primary headache in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third edition (ICHD-3) diagnostic criteria, but there are secondary etiologies as well. We present a case of secondary NH that associated with vascular lesion.Case presentationWe report on a 40-year-old man with a medical history of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis who developed a headache after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting because of Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis(ICAS). This new-onset headache was a pinprick headache confined to the parietal part of the head and 5 cm in size. This headache most closely resembled the phenotype of a NH. And other causes of secondary headache were excluded. Thus, the diagnosis of NH was highly speculated. This patient represents a rare headache phenomenon after intracranial arterial stent placement.ConclusionThis is the first report of NH after stent placement treatment in a patient with ICAS.

Thromboelastographic and Gene Polymorphism Bimodality Detection for Dual Antiplatelet Aggregation Therapy in Individuals with Clopidogrel-resistant Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis.

Recent research indicates that clopidogrel resistance is connected with a patient's future ischemia risk, hence increasing the likelihood of recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Thromboelastographic and clopidogrel gene polymorphism testing can be used to see how a person responds to antiplatelet therapy and change the treatment plan accordingly. This may be a good way to make antiplatelet aggregation therapy more effective and safer. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of dual antiplatelet aggregation therapy in patients with symptomatic intracranial large artery stenosis being resistant to clopidogrel tablets. The thromboelastographic and gene polymorphism bimodality detection techniques were used to analyze the clopidogrel resistance influencing factors. 89 patients with symptomatic intracranial large arterial stenosis who were admitted to our hospital from February 2021 to February 2022 were selected, classified as large artery atherosclerotic type by TOAST, and confirmed as having severe intracranial large arterial stenosis (70 % to 99 %) by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomographic angiography (CTA), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). All patients were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, and thromboelastography and clopidogrel gene polymorphism were monitored 1 week later. 44 of 89 patients were clopidogrel-resistant. Among 44 patients, 20 were ticagrelorresistant and 24 were cilostazol-resistant. Clopidogrel had a resistance rate of 49.4%. The recurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular disease in the three groups was statistically significant (P<0.05) after 3 months of follow-up treatment, but bleeding (intracranial, gastrointestinal, respiratory, urinary, and mucocutaneous) and dyspnea were not. The clopidogrel-resistant group had a higher number of females, as well as higher levels of hypertension, diabetes, and platelet count than the sensitive group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in age, smoking, alcohol consumption, previous stroke, glycosylated haemoglobin, creatinine, or low-density cholesterol. Using thromboelastographic and gene polymorphism bimodality detection, we found switching to ticagrelor antiplatelet aggregation therapy as better than switching to cilostazol in patients with symptomatic intracranial large artery stenosis being resistant to clopidogrel tablets. The results may be biased due to the study being a single-centre study and having a limited sample size.

Abstract TP31: Identifying Multivariate Nonlinear Bias in Sammpris Using Graph-Based AI Analysis

Background: Clinical trials are the most rigorous way of testing how novel treatments compare with existing ones regarding outcomes. The randomized controlled clinical trial has become the standard means of providing proof of safety and effectiveness across the board in medicine, including stroke. Yet, the risk factors among patients that are randomized might not always be equally distributed such that a bias may occur. In this study, we focus on the SAMMPRIS clinical trial aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of aggressive medical management versus stenting for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Methods: We developed and evaluated a machine learning model to identify potential multivariate bias present in the dataset that could not have been identified using standard statistical tests. Our approach utilizes a machine learning model based on the spectral regression model (SR-KDA) to identify biases created by combinations of variables. SR-KDA is based on a graph representation of the data that is processed via discriminative analysis to identify groups of patients that share common characteristics. By using both the treatment and outcome variables as constraints, the model is able to identify nonlinear relationships between clinical variables and the outcome. It can also be used to identify bias as part of the randomization that could have inadvertently skewed the statistical results with standard methodologies. Results: Our approach was successfully applied to the SAMMPRIS clinical dataset, which includes 121 clinical variables. The algorithm was able to automatically identify 6 clusters of patients that had a different response to treatment when considering the clinical variables. Each group was then assigned a set of the variables' cut-off values that best describe them. Conclusion: We have developed a sophisticated system that is capable of detecting non-linear correlations in clinical data collected during trials. This solution has the potential to mitigate any biases that may arise during the randomization process, which could ultimately improve recruitment efforts. Moving forward, this innovative tool could be applied proactively to future clinical trials.

Abstract TP174: Balloon Expandable Stents versus Self-Expanding Stents for Treatment of Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: There is limited data regarding the comparison of balloon-expanding stents (BES) and self-expanding stents (SES) for the treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify studies that compared SES and BES in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Data were extracted from relevant studies found through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until May 2023. Statistical pooling with random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the rates/severity of post-procedure stenosis, technical success, stroke and/or mortality, long-term events, and restenosis rates between BES and SES. Results: A total of 20 studies were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) for post-procedure stenosis (%) was significantly lower (SMD: -0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.79 to -0.24, p &lt; 0.001, 10 studies involving 1515 patients) with BES. The odds for technical success were non-significantly lower (odds ratio [OR]: 0.99, 95% CI 0.43-2.26, p = 0.983, 9 studies involving 1001 patients) with BES. The odds for post-procedure 30-day stroke and/or death were significantly lower (OR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.94, p = 0.019, 15 studies involving 2431 patients), and stroke and/or death beyond 30 days were non-significantly lower (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.30-1.37, p = 0.250, 10 studies involving 947 patients) with BES. The odds for restenosis rate were significantly lower (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80, p = 0.004, 13 studies involving 1115 patients) with BES. Conclusions: Compared with SES, BES was associated with lower rates of post-procedure 30-day stroke and/or death presumably due to less severe post-procedure stenosis in the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Abstract TP299: The Relationship Between Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Rate and Cerebral Perfusion

Background and and Objectives: The pressure ratio (PR) across lesions is a vital indicator for assessing residual blood flow after stenosis, yet the relationship between symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis degrees and cross-lesion pressure ratios remains unclear. Methods: Data were derived from the Chinese National Stroke Registry III (CNSR III). Three-dimensional meshes were constructed based on TOF-MRA using the finite element method controlled by the Navier-Stokes equation to obtain pressure values. PR was calculated as the ratio of proximal to distal pressure at the stenosis site, indicating post-stenosis blood flow. PR &gt; 0.76 meant normal pressure ratio, while PR ≤ 0.76 indicated reduced ratio. Arterial stenosis severity was categorized using the WASID Method: 50%-69% for moderate and 70%-99% for severe. Statistical analysis explored the correlation between stenosis severity and low PR. Results: The study included 438 patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (50-99%), median age 64, 33.79% female. PR ≤ 0.76 accounted for 30%. Among them, PR ≤ 0.76 was observed in 26% of moderate stenosis (50-69%) patients and 39% of severe stenosis (70-99%) patients (Figure A). The PR ≤ 0.76 frequency was significantly higher in severe compared to moderate stenosis (P=0.01). For anterior (Figure B) and posterior (Figure C) circulation stenosis, PR ≤ 0.76 accounted for 43% and 22% respectively, more prevalent in severe stenosis (P=0.01 and P=0.61, respectively). Conclusion: Most patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis exhibit normal PR levels, with a correlation between arterial stenosis and cross-lesion pressure ratio. Further research is needed to determine if PR is a more suitable criterion than arterial stenosis for selecting patients for stent treatment.

Self-expanding versus balloon expandable stent for intracranial arterial stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

There are limited data regarding the comparison of balloon expandable stents (BES) and self-expanding stents (SES) for the treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis. We conducted a systematic review to identify studies that compared SES and BES in patients with symptomaticintracranial arterial stenosis. Data were extracted from relevant studies found through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until from January 1, 2010 to September 28, 2023. Statistical pooling with random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the rates/severity ofpostprocedure stenosis, technical success, 30-day stroke and/or death, cumulative clinical endpoints, and restenosis rates. A total of 20 studies were included.The standardized mean difference (SMD) for postprocedure stenosis (%) was significantly lower (SMD: -0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.79 to -0.24, p < .001, 10 studies involving 1515 patients) with BES. The odds for 30-day stroke and/or death were significantly lower (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.94, p = .019, 15 studies involving 2431 patients), and cumulative clinical endpoints on follow-up were nonsignificantly lower (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.30-1.37, p = .250, 10 studies involving 947 patients) with BES. The odds for restenosis during follow-up were significantly lower (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80, p = .004, 13 studies involving 1115 patients) with BES. Compared with SES, BES were associated with lower rates of postprocedure 30-day stroke and/or death with lower rates of restenosis during follow up andthe treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

An interpretable machine learning model for stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic arterial stenosis.

Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (SICAS) is the most common etiology of ischemic stroke and one of the main causes of high stroke recurrence. The recurrence of stroke is closely related to the prognosis of ischemic stroke. This study aims to develop a machine learning model based on high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) to predict the risk of stroke recurrence in SICAS. This study retrospectively collected data from 180 SICAS stroke patients treated at the hospital between 2020.01 and 2022.01. Relevant imaging and clinical data were collected, and follow-up was conducted. The dataset was divided into a training set and a validation set in a ratio of 7:3. We employed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to perform a selection on the baseline data, laboratory tests, and neuroimaging data generated by HR-VWI scans collected from the training set. Finally, five machine learning techniques, including logistic regression model (LR), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB), Complement naive Bayes (CNB), and k-nearest neighbors algorithm (kNN), were employed to develop a predictive model for stroke recurrence. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) was used to provide visualization and interpretation for each patient. The model's effectiveness was evaluated using average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, f1 score, PR curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. LASSO analysis revealed that "history of hypertension," "homocysteine level," "NWI value," "stenosis rate," "intracranial hemorrhage," "positive remodeling," and "enhancement grade" were independent risk factors for stroke recurrence in SICAS patients. In 10-fold cross-validation, the area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.813 to 0.912 in ROC curve analysis. The area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) ranged from 0.655 to 0.833, with the Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) model exhibiting the best ability to predict stroke recurrence in SICAS. SHAP analysis provided interpretability for the machine learning model and revealed essential factors related to the risk of stroke recurrence in SICAS. A precise machine learning-based prediction model for stroke recurrence in SICAS has been established to assist clinical practitioners in making clinical decisions and implementing personalized treatment measures.

Non-HDL-C, Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, and Recurrent Vascular Risk in Minor Stroke

Non-HDL-C, Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis, and Recurrent Vascular Risk in Minor Stroke

Endovascular Therapy Versus Medical Treatment for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis.

Endovascular Therapy Versus Medical Treatment for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis.

The Association Between the Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

The association between the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) and intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has not yet been reported. In this large-scale investigation, 7894 AIS patients with ICAS-evaluation imaging data from the Third China National Stroke Registry were included. ICAS was defined as >50% stenosis of the intracranial arteries. We dichotomized the degree of ICAS into stenosis and occlusion. The number of ICAS lesions was the total number of intracranial stenotic arteries. Fibrinogen and albumin levels were assessed in the central laboratory of Beijing Tiantan Hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression were used to determine the association between the FAR quartiles and ICAS. A total of 3900 (49.66%) patients had ICAS. Compared with those of the lowest FAR quartile, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the highest FAR quartile were 1.26 (1.10-1.44), 1.15 (.99-1.33), and 1.19 (1.01-1.39) for ICAS, symptomatic ICAS, and asymptomatic ICAS, respectively. An elevated FAR was also associated with occlusion (adjusted OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.10-1.49) and lesion number ≥2 (adjusted OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.07-1.45).

The 2023 Taiwan Stroke Society Guidelines for the management of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, especially in Asian populations, which has a high risk of recurrent stroke and cardiovascular comorbidities. The present guidelines aim to provide updated evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management of patients with ICAD. Taiwan Stroke Society guideline consensus group developed recommendations for management of patients with ICAD via consensus meetings based on updated evidences. Each proposed class of recommendation and level of evidence was approved by all members of the group. The guidelines cover six topics, including (1) epidemiology and diagnostic evaluation of ICAD, (2) nonpharmacological management of ICAD, (3) medical therapy for symptomatic ICAD, (4) endovascular thrombectomy and rescue therapy for acute ischemic stroke with underlying ICAD, (5) endovascular interventional therapy for postacute symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis, and (6) surgical treatment of chronic symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Intensive medical treatment including antiplatelet therapy, risk factor control, and life style modification are essential for patients with ICAD.

Safety and efficacy of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: a systematic reveiw and meta-analysis

Background: Stroke is currently the second-leading cause of death just behind ischaemic heart disease. Drug therapy is currently the standard of care for patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (sICAS). Stenting is an important treatment for the prevention and treatment of ischemic stroke. It has been suggested that vertebral artery stenting might reduce this risk, but operation-related complications limit the application of stenting in the treatment of ischemic stroke. The differences in the safety and efficacy of stenting combined with drugs and drugs alone in the treatment of sICAS are unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of both treatment modalities on the prognosis of patients with sICAS through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods: The Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, DUXIU) and English databases (Pubmed, Embase, Ovid_medline, Cochrane library, Web of science)were searched to identify all studies describing sICAS. The “Risk of Bias Assessment” tool and the “Jadad Scale” provided by the Cochrane Collaboration were used to evaluate the risk of bias and quality of the collected literature. The risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined using Stata statistical software version 14.0.Results: A total of 11 studies were included, comprising a total of 1,915 patients. The combined results of the study showed no significant difference between the incidence of transient cerebral ischemia (TIA)and stroke in patients with sICAS treated with drugs in combination with stents versus drugs alone. The incidence of death or stroke, cerebral haemorrhage, disabling stroke or death was significantly higher in patients receiving stent-combined drug therapy versus drug therapy alone for sICAS.Conclusion: Studies suggest that stenting combined with medication for patients with sICAS may increase the incidence of death or stroke, cerebral haemorrhage, stroke or death, but has no significant effect on the incidence of TIA and stroke. The studies report inadequate and conflicting data and therefore the safety and efficacy of stenting for sICAS should be interpreted with caution.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022377090, identifier CRD42022377090

Elevated hs-CRP and Symptomatic Intracranial/Extracranial Artery Stenosis Predict Stroke Recurrence after Acute Ischemic Stroke or TIA.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial/extracranial artery stenosis and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). This study included 10404 patients from the Third China National Stroke Registry. Patients were divided into four or six groups according to patterns of intracranial or extracranial artery stenosis and hs-CRP levels. The outcomes were recurrence of ischemic stroke, stroke, and combined vascular events (CVE) at 1 year. The associations between different combinations of hsCRP levels and patterns of artery stenosis and recurrent events were analyzed by multivariable Cox regression models. Patients in Group III (hs-CRP ＜3＋symptomatic intracranial or extracranial artery stenosis) had higher risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-2.48,p=0.003). Those in Group VI (hs-CRP ≥ 3＋symptomatic intracranial or extracranial artery stenosis) had the highest risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.42-2.92, p=0.0001) within 1 year compared with Group I (hs-CRP ＜3＋no artery stenosis). Asymptomatic intracranial or extracranial artery stenosis did not increase the risk of ischemic events compared with no artery stenosis regardless of hs-CRP levels. Symptomatic intracranial or extracranial artery stenosis was associated with increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, stroke, and CVE at 1 year in patients with AIS or TIA, especially in patients with elevated hs-CRP levels. Asymptomatic intracranial or extracranial artery stenosis did not increase the risk of ischemic events compared with no artery stenosis regardless of hs-CRP levels.

Stenting versus medical therapy alone for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

IntroductionIntracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a common cause of stroke worldwide. However, whether the treatment options for symptomatic ICAS is stent placement or medical therapy alone is still controversial. At...

Borderzone Infarcts and Recurrent Cerebrovascular Events in Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS)-related stroke occurs due to three primary mechanisms with distinct infarct patterns: (1) borderzone infarcts (BZI) due to impaired distal perfusion, (2) territorial infarcts due to distal plaque/thrombus embolization, and (3) plaque progression occluding perforators. The objective of the systematic review is to determine whether BZI secondary to ICAS is associated with a higher risk of recurrent stroke or neurological deterioration. As part of this registered systematic review (CRD42021265230), a comprehensive search was performed to identify relevant papers and conference abstracts (with ≥20 patients) reporting initial infarct patterns and recurrence rates in patients with symptomatic ICAS. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies including any BZI versus isolated BZI and those excluding posterior circulation stroke. The study outcome included neurological deterioration or recurrent stroke during follow-up. For all outcome events, corresponding risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. A literature search yielded 4,478 records with 32 selected during the title/abstract triage for full text; 11 met inclusion criteria and 8 studies were included in the analysis (n=1,219 patients; 341 with BZI). The meta-analysis demonstrated that the RR of outcome in the BZI group compared to the no BZI group was 2.10 (95% CI 1.52-2.90). Limiting the analysis to studies including any BZI, the RR was 2.10 (95% CI 1.38-3.18). For isolated BZI, RR was 2.59 (95% CI 1.24-5.41). RR was 2.96 (95% CI 1.71-5.12) for studies only including anterior circulation stroke patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that the presence of BZI secondary to ICAS may be an imaging biomarker that predicts neurological deterioration and/or stroke recurrence.

Balloon Angioplasty for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis (BASIS): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial

BackgroundThe superiority of balloon angioplasty plus aggressive medical management (AMM) to AMM alone for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (sICAS) on efficacy and safety profiles still lacks evidence from randomised controlled...