Abstract TP174: Balloon Expandable Stents versus Self-Expanding Stents for Treatment of Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Background: There is limited data regarding the comparison of balloon-expanding stents (BES) and self-expanding stents (SES) for the treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify studies that compared SES and BES in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Data were extracted from relevant studies found through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until May 2023. Statistical pooling with random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the rates/severity of post-procedure stenosis, technical success, stroke and/or mortality, long-term events, and restenosis rates between BES and SES. Results: A total of 20 studies were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) for post-procedure stenosis (%) was significantly lower (SMD: -0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.79 to -0.24, p < 0.001, 10 studies involving 1515 patients) with BES. The odds for technical success were non-significantly lower (odds ratio [OR]: 0.99, 95% CI 0.43-2.26, p = 0.983, 9 studies involving 1001 patients) with BES. The odds for post-procedure 30-day stroke and/or death were significantly lower (OR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.94, p = 0.019, 15 studies involving 2431 patients), and stroke and/or death beyond 30 days were non-significantly lower (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.30-1.37, p = 0.250, 10 studies involving 947 patients) with BES. The odds for restenosis rate were significantly lower (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80, p = 0.004, 13 studies involving 1115 patients) with BES. Conclusions: Compared with SES, BES was associated with lower rates of post-procedure 30-day stroke and/or death presumably due to less severe post-procedure stenosis in the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.