Symptoms Of Achalasia Research Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Repeat Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy After Failed POEM for Achalasia: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective option for treating achalasia. Despite its high efficacy, a fraction of patients remain symptomatic after POEM, and the data on the optimal management of these patients is limited. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of repeat POEM after a failed POEM. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeat POEM for persistent symptoms after the initial POEM. We searched major databases from inception to April 2024 to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of repeat POEM after failed POEM in patients with achalasia. Our outcomes of interest were clinical success (a reduction in the Eckardt score to ≤3 after the procedure), adverse events, and differences in pre-procedure and post-procedure Eckardt scores. Using the random effects model, we calculated pooled rates with 95% CI for categorical variables and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. We included 6 observational studies with 123 patients. The mean time between myotomies ranged from 12.2 to 13.5 months. The pooled rate (95% CI) of clinical success was 82.69% (95% CI; 69.65%-93.06%). The pooled rate (95% CI) of adverse events was 17.97% (95% CI: 5.08%-35.15%). The pooled mean±SD post-procedure Eckardt score was 1.63±1.93. The mean post-procedure Eckardt score was significantly lower than the re-procedure Eckardt score, MD (95% CI): 3.68 (2.58, 4.78). Repeated POEM is an effective option for persistent symptoms of achalasia after initial POEM; however, it is associated with nontrivial adverse events.

BN SO47 - Can Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) be the new gold standard for Achalasia? – as it is safe and effective

Abstract Background Laparoscopic Heller’s cardiomyotomy is the gold standard for treatment of achalasia. POEM has emerged as a revolutionary minimal invasive procedure in the management of achalasia and related oesophageal motility disorders. POEM effectively utilises an endoscopic approach by creating a submucosal tunnel to perform a myotomy at the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) , achieving symptomatic relief. Being firstly introduced in 2008, POEM offers an excellent alternative option to surgical intervention and conservative approaches. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of POEM since its introduction in our unit. Method POEM procedures performed in adult patients are recruited prospectively from May 2020 to January 2024 and data are collected using electronic trust records. Eckardt score (a commonly used scoring system to characterise severity of achalasia) is recorded before and after the procedure. A total of 46 patients are identified however three patients are excluded in this study due to unavailable clinical information. This study presents a cohort of patients with median age of 60 and an equal gender distribution. Results Out of 43 patients, 69.8% were treatment naïve and 30.2% had previous treatments. Mean Eckardt score pre-procedure was 8.2. The average length of hospital stay was 1.7 days and immediate post treatment complications were 6.9% (2.3% mucosotomy, 2.3% oesophageal leak, 2.3% infection). No mortality was recorded within 30 days post-procedure. A 93% clinical success rate (Eckardt score ≤3) was achieved in the initial follow-up period (three to six months) with a mean Eckardt score of 1.1. 41.9% of patients experienced reflux symptoms which require proton pump inhibitor use within four weeks post-procedure. 18.4% of patients had recurrent achalasia symptoms over their follow-up period. Conclusion The clinical success rate (Eckardt score ≤3) and recurrence rate post POEM in this study are comparable with the international cohort quoted in literature. Post POEM reflux rate is prevalent, which is a well-known complication. The substantial improvement in clinical outcomes, evidenced by the Eckardt score reduction and the low incidence of post-operative complications, underscores the procedure’s efficacy and safety. Overall, POEM represents a significant advancement in the treatment of oesophageal motility disorders, especially achalasia. This study presents POEM as a safer and less invasive treatment alternative compared to Heller’s cardiomyotomy.

To Dor or Not to Dor? Heller Myotomy, a Retrospective Study.

Achalasia is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting esophageal sphincter function. Treatment options include non-surgical and surgical approaches, such as Heller myotomy (HM). Combining Dor fundoplication with HM is controversial but may prevent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether HM with Dor fundoplication reduces GERD rates and increases dysphagia rates. Eighty patients who underwent HM between January 2018 and August 2023 were included. Sixty-four patients had Dor fundoplication and were matched 4:1 to 16 patients without fundoplication. Records were reviewed for GERD and achalasia symptoms at various postoperative time points. No significant differences in GERD or dysphagia symptoms were found between the two groups at any time point. Similarly, there were no significant differences in chest pain or dysphagia treatment. In conclusion, this study suggests that the addition of Dor fundoplication to HM does not significantly impact postoperative GERD or achalasia-related symptoms.

Treatment outcomes and esophageal cancer incidence by disease type in achalasia patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy: Retrospective study.

This retrospective study aimed to compare treatment outcomes and postoperative courses, including the incidence of esophageal cancer (EC), according to disease types, in 450 achalasia patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Data from consecutive POEM procedures performed from September 2011 to January 2023 at a single institution were reviewed. Achalasia was classified into straight (St), sigmoid (S1), and advanced sigmoid (S2) types using esophagography findings. Regarding efficacy, POEM was considered successful if the Eckardt score was ≤3. A statistical examination of the incidence and trend of EC occurrence across the disease type of achalasia was conducted using propensity score matching. Of the 450 patients, 349 were diagnosed with St, 80 with S1, and 21 with S2. POEM efficacy was 97.9% at 1 year and 94.2% at 2 years postprocedure, with no statistical difference between disease types. Using propensity score matching, the incidence of EC in each disease type was as follows: St, 1% (1/98); S1, 2.5% (2/77); S2, 10% (2/18). While no statistical significance was observed between St (1.0%: 1/98) and all sigmoid types (4.0%, 4/95; P = 0.3686). However, a trend test revealed a tendency for EC to occur more frequently in the order of S2, S1, and St type with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0413). Outcomes of POEM are favorable for all disease types. After POEM, it is important not only to monitor the improvement of achalasia symptoms but also to pay attention to the occurrence of EC, especially in patients with sigmoid-type achalasia.

ThP3.5 - A systematic review of comparing the outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy vs pneumatic dilation in patients diagnosed with achalasia

Abstract Objective The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the success rate of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) versus pneumatic dilation (PD) for patients with achalasia. Methods Studies reporting success rates and symptoms in patients undergoing POEM versus PD were selected from medical electronic databases and meta-analysis was conducted by following the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration using statistical software RevMan version 5. Results Four studies on 319 patients reporting success rates and Eckardt scores were included. In the random effect model analysis, the success rate [odds ratio (OR) 6.22, 95%, CI (3.23, 11.97), Z = 5.47, p = 0.00001] favoured the PD and there was no heterogeneity (Tau2 = 0; Chi2 = 1.29, df = 2 (P = 0.53; I2 = 0 %) among included studies. Eckardt scores [mean difference -0.36, 95%, CI (-0.76, 0.03), Z = 1.79, p = 0.07] suggesting the achalasia symptoms severity was also similar in both interventions. There was moderate heterogeneity (Tau2 = 0.10; Chi2 = 7.47, df = 3 (P = 0.06; I2 = 60 %) among the included studies. Conclusion The POEM seems to be more successful when compared to the PD for patients with achalasia. On comparison of Eckardt score, there was no statistical difference seen between the two groups.

519. ROBOTIC HELLER DOR FOR SYMPTOMATIC ACHALASIA. A SINGLE TERTIARY CENTER EXPERIENCE

Abstract Background Minimally invasive Heller-Dor is the best therapeutic option for symptomatic achalasia. The aim of this study is to describe the introduction of Robotic program for Heller-Dor procedure (RAHD) in a tertiary center evaluating clinical and surgical outcome. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with symptomatic achalasia through clinical, endoscopic, and manometric workup, that were eligible for RAHD. We included all consecutive patients underwent RADH between September 2019 and December 2023 using the DaVinci Xi surgical system. Patients with previous endoscopic or surgical treatment for achalasia were excluded. Results Data from 44 patients were collected. Patients’ characteristics are summarized in table 1. Most patients were in good clinical condition with an ASA score 1-2 and a CCI 1-2 in more than 80% of cases. Mean Eckhardt score (ES) was 6 (SD 2.05). Most frequent symptom was dysphagia, present in all patients but with different severity. Mean operating time was 184 minutes (SD 46). Mucosal tear occurred in three cases and all were sutured immediately, an abdominal drain was placed only in the first case. A regular postoperative course was observed in all patients. All patients underwent a post-op gastrografin esophagogram before starting a liquid diet; none revealed leakage or treatment failure. Three patients (6,8 %) experienced Clavien-Dindo grade I complication, one hepatic hematoma, one pneumothorax, and one PONV. No severe complications were reported. Maximum length of hospital stay was 4 days, mean 3.2 (SD 0.42). All patients were discharged with a well-tolerated soft diet. Mean ES at follow up was 0.58 (SD 0.7) at 1 months. After 6 months and 1 year, no patients reported recurrence of symptoms (ES <3), but three patients reported symptomatic reflux (6,8%). Conclusion Our experience suggests that introduction of RAHD is safe and effective in the treatment of symptomatic achalasia in a tertiary center for Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.

792. EVALUATION OF EXTENSIVE MYOTOMY ASSOCIATED WITH DOR-MODIFIED ANTERIOR FUNDOPLICATION (PINOTTI) FOR SHORT- AND LONG-TERM TREATMENT OF ACHALASIA: A COHORT STUDY

Abstract Introduction Achalasia is the main esophageal motility disorder and has a significant negative impact on the patient's quality of life. The management of achalasia primarily aims to reduce LES pressure. Surgical treatment involves a Heller myotomy, combined with a fundoplication to prevent reflux. Method Prospective cohort study with 79 patients in two hospitals, one public and one private, in the city of Natal, Brazil. To evaluate the effectiveness of the surgical technique developed with the intention of treating achalasia, a long myotomy associated with the modified Dor anterior fundoplication (Pinotti). All patients were evaluated postoperatively as follows: 1) first week after surgery they were interviewed by the master surgeon; 2) thirty days after surgery they were interviewed regarding symptoms of achalasia in the postoperative period. Results Seventy nine (79) patients were submitted for a long myotomy procedure associated with modified Dor anterior fundoplication (Pinotti). Seventy nine (79) patients were followed up. Although, seventy three (73) patients had improvement in symptoms related to achalasia and are clinically satisfied. Six (6) patients had recurrence of achalasia symptoms, such as dysphagia. Conclusion The long myotomy associated with the modified Dor anterior fundoplication (Pinotti) was the standard procedure in the study and obtained good results in 89,83% of the cases followed during the control of achalasia symptoms with a minimum rate of adverse effects in the postoperative period

516. HELLER MYOTOMY FOR SYMPTOMATIC ACHALASIA: TRADITIONAL LAPAROSCOPY OR ROBOTICS? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS

Abstract Background Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LH) has been established as the gold standard for symptomatic achalasia; robotic-assisted laparoscopic myotomy (RH) has shown promising outcomes regarding safety and effectiveness. We aim to meta-analyse data comparing LH and RH surgical outcomes and complications. Methods A systematic search was conducted in February 2024 without restrictions according to PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Register. Studies comparing laparoscopic and robotic approach for Heller myotomy in adults with symptomatic achalasia were included for systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed trough generalized linear mixed model in R 4.3.2. Results 16 observational studies, out of 273, were included; reporting on 15076 patients. No statistically differences in preop characteristics were noted. RH had significantly fewer intraoperative esophageal perforations (OR=7.29, p< 0.0001, 95%), fewer subsequent myotomies and endoscopic treatments for recurrence (OR= 3.64, p=0.01 and OR= 3.38, p=0.03) and better symptom score improvement (OR=0.507, p=0.04). Although not clinically significant, RH had shorter hospital stays (MD=0.45 days, p= 0.005,) and reduced intraoperative blood loss (MD=10.46 ml, p=0.0002). Although not statistically significant, RH had fewer bleeding episodes, lower conversion, reintervention and mortality rates, comparable morbidity and postoperative GERD and higher operative time. Conclusion This updated meta-analysis suggests that RH is associated with lower regarding perforations, recurrence rates and symptom improvement compared to LH, with negligible lengthening of operative times. RH for symptomatic achalasia represents a feasible treatment for symptomatic achalasia, with a satisfying safety and effectiveness profile. RCTs on the topic and about cost-effectiveness evaluations are necessary to support the reported data.

Does preoperative symptom duration affect outcomes following per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)?

Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a safe therapy for the treatment of achalasia. Long-term effects of untreated achalasia include worsening dysmotility and disruptions in esophageal anatomy, i.e., tortuosity and dilation. We hypothesize that long-standing achalasia prior to intervention will have worse outcomes following POEM than in patients with symptoms for shorter duration. We retrospectively analyzed achalasia patients who underwent POEM at our institution from 2011 to 2023, categorizing them into symptom duration cohorts (< 1year, 1-3years, 4-10years, > 10years). Inclusion criteria comprised patients with documented achalasia diagnosis who received POEM treatment at our facility. Exclusion criteria encompassed individuals lacking data pertaining to achalasia diagnosis, the time frame before intervention, or those missing pre and postoperative Eckardt scores. POEM failure was defined as symptom recurrence, necessity for repeat intervention, or high postoperative Eckardt score. We compared demographic, preoperative, and postoperative outcomes across these cohorts, and employed multivariable logistic regression to explore the link between symptom duration and POEM response. During the study period, in our increased cohort 234 patients met inclusion criteria. 75 patients had symptoms for < 1year, 78 patients had symptoms from 1 to 3years, 47 patients had symptoms from 4 to 10years, and 34 patients had symptoms > 10years. Patient demographics such as age, sex, BMI, Charleson-Deyo-Comorbidity-Index, and diabetes did not differ amongst cohorts. High-resolution manometry data, including achalasia type, Median IRP, LES residual pressure, and Basal LES pressure did not differ between groups. Preoperative Eckardt scores ranged from 4 to 5 across groups (p 0.24). Patients endorsed an average of three total preoperative symptoms across groups (p 0.13). Patients with symptoms greater than 4years had significantly more endoscopic interventions prior to POEM (37% vs, 68% p .001). There was no significant difference in post-procedure mean Eckardt scores between cohorts. All cohorts experienced the same number of post-POEM symptoms. Post-POEM manometric measurements remained consistent across cohorts. Similarly, there were no significant differences in terms of symptom recurrence, requirement for repeat interventions, or repeat POEM among the cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined achalasia symptoms greater than a decade did not result in increased odds of having a higher postoperative Eckardt score, worse dysphagia, regurgitation, or weight loss. In this increased cohort, this data once again suggests that longer symptom duration is not associated with increased rates of POEM failure.

Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for pediatric achalasia: A nationwide study.

Achalasia, a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax and loss of esophageal peristalsis, significantly impacts pediatric patient quality of life through symptoms like dysphagia, chest pain, and weight loss. This nationwide retrospective cohort study evaluates the efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for pediatric achalasia in Mongolia, contributing to the limited global data on this minimally invasive treatment in children. Conducted between February 2020 and March 2022 at 2 tertiary centers, the study included symptomatic achalasia patients, treatment-naive or those with unsatisfactory outcomes from previous esophageal dilations. The POEM procedure was assessed for its impact on esophageal structure and function, symptom severity via the Eckardt score, and procedure-related safety, with outcomes measured at baseline, 3 days, and 12 months post-procedure. The study demonstrated notable post-procedure improvements across all measured outcomes: abnormal contraction length and esophageal width significantly reduced, underscoring the procedure's effectiveness. More precisely, the integrated relaxation pressure showed a significant improvement from a mean of 26.8 mm Hg (standard deviation [SD], 5.4 mm Hg) pre-procedure to 10.8 mm Hg (SD, 1.1 mm Hg) 12 months (P < .001). Similarly, Eckardt scores, which assess symptom severity, improved significantly from a pre-procedure mean of 7.0 (SD, 1.0) to a substantially lower score post-procedure (P < .001), reflecting enhanced patient quality of life and symptom alleviation. This study underscores POEM's role as an effective, minimally invasive option for pediatric achalasia management within the Mongolian population, offering significant symptomatic relief and improved esophageal function.

Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction in Achalasia.

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain. Impairment of vagal function has been reported in achalasia. This study evaluated autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunctions in patients with achalasia to establish a correlation between an ANS dysfunction and the clinical symptoms of achalasia. Nineteen patients with achalasia (six males/13 females; mean age, 47.1±16.3 years) and 10 healthy controls (four males/six females; 34.8±10.7 years) were enrolled prospectively at Gangnam Severance Hospital between June 2013 and June 2014. All patients completed a questionnaire on ANS dysfunction symptoms and underwent a heart rate variability (HRV) test. ANS dysfunction symptoms were present in 13 patients with achalasia (69%) and three controls (30%). The ANS dysfunction score was significantly higher in patients with achalasia than in the controls (p=0.035). There were no significant differences in the standard deviation of all normal R-R intervals, high frequency (HF), low frequency (LF), and LF/HF ratio in the HRV test. In subgroup analysis comparing female achalasia patients with controls, the cardiac activity was significantly higher in the female achalasia patients than in the controls (p=0.036). The cardiac activity (p=0.004) and endurance to stress (p=0.004) were significantly higher in the achalasia patients with ANS dysfunction symptoms than the achalasia patients without ANS dysfunction symptoms. ANS dysfunction symptoms are common in patients with achalasia. Female achalasia patients and those with ANS dysfunction symptoms showed increased cardiac activity. Hence, more attention should be paid to cardiac overload in achalasia patients who are female or have ANS dysfunction symptoms.

Utility of Intraprocedural Luminal Diameter and Distensibility Measurements During the Esophageal Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Procedure.

Through evaluation of the lower esophageal sphincter immediately before and after myotomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EFLIP), our study aimed to determine the clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and the incidence of postprocedure reflux. Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and diminished peristalsis. POEM is a therapeutic option for durable management of achalasia. However, symptomatic acid reflux and esophagitis are well-known adverse effects of the procedure. Electronic medical records of 168 patients who underwent POEM for achalasia at 2 tertiary care referral centers from May 2014 to May 2021 were reviewed. EFLIP was used at a range of catheter fill volumes to assess LES dynamics. Preprocedure and postprocedure Eckardt Symptom Scores were recorded. Significant clinical improvement from POEM was sustained in over 94% of patients after 1 year. EFLIP changed intraprocedural management 5% of the time by means of myotomy extension. In patients with reflux>1 year following POEM, there was no significant difference in post-POEM LES diameter or change in LES diameter compared with those without reflux. However, post-POEM LES distensibility index (DI) was significantly higher in patients with reflux after 1 year compared with those without reflux. POEM is a safe and increasingly effective therapy for patients with symptomatic achalasia. Intraprocedural EFLIP measurements suggest that post-POEM reflux may be correlated more with DI than LES diameter. Yet, more data is needed to substantiate these outcomes.

Pearls From the Pros: The Paradox of Achalasia Symptoms

Pearls From the Pros: The Paradox of Achalasia Symptoms

Presence of esophageal contractility after achalasia treatment is associated with improved esophageal emptying.

Some achalasia patients exhibit esophageal contractile activity on follow-up after treatment, yet its importance remains unclear. We aimed to identify factors associated with presence of contractility after treatment and to assess its impact on timed barium esophagram (TBE) and clinical outcomes. Patients with type I or II achalasia on baseline high-resolution manometry (HRM) who completed HRM, TBE, and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) after treatment were retrospectively identified. Contractility was defined on post-treatment HRM as presence of at least 1 supine swallow with DCI ≥100 mmHg s cm. One hundred twenty-two patients were included (mean age 48 ± 17 years, 50% female). At follow-up evaluation after treatment (54% peroral endoscopic myotomy, 24% pneumatic dilation, 22% laparoscopic Heller myotomy), 61 (50%) patients had contractility on HRM. Patients with contractility (compared to those without) more frequently had type II achalasia (84% vs 57%, p = 0.001) and a post-treatment normal EGJ opening classification on FLIP (69% vs 49%; p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with post-treatment integrated relaxation pressure <15 mmHg and normal EGJ opening on FLIP (n = 53), those with contractility had a lower median column height on TBE at 1 min (4 vs 7 cm, p = 0.002) and 5 min (0 vs 5 cm, p = 0.001). In patients with "abnormal" EGJ metrics, patients with contractility showed lower symptom scores (median Eckardt score 2 vs 3, p = 0.03). Occurring more frequently in type II achalasia, and if adequate EGJ opening is achieved after treatment, esophageal contractility may contribute to improved esophageal emptying and improved symptoms in non-spastic achalasia. Preservation of esophageal body muscle could improve outcomes in these patients.

The Comparison of Deep Sedation and Moderate Sedation in Pneumatic Balloon Dilation of Achalasia Patients

Background: Pneumatic Balloon Dilation (PBD) as an achalasia treatment is painful procedure because of tearing the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) muscle fibres. Recently, two sedation methods including the moderate sedation and deep sedation are used for increasing the convenience of the patients and gastroenterologist.&#x0D; Methods: To compare the efficacy of moderate and deep sedation in PBD in treatment of Idiopathic Achalasia (IA).&#x0D; Results: We prospectively assessed 200 IA patients. The first 100 patients (group A) underwent PBD by the moderate sedation using diazepam or midazolam and meperidine injections. The patients in the group B (100 patients) received midazolam, fentanyl and propofol as a deep sedation. The pulse rate (PR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), respiratory rate (RR), and oxygen saturation were monitored before, during and after PBD and achalasia symptom scores (ASS) were collected before and 1.5 months after treatment. The mean PR during and after procedures in the group B were significantly lower compared to the group A (p 0.001, 0.028). The patients in group B revealed less SBP and DBP after PBD versus group A (p 0.004, 0.002). The mean psi for 30 mm and 35 mm balloon dilators were significantly increased in group B compared to group (p 0.0001, 0.002).&#x0D; Conclusion: We concluded that the deep sedation of achalasia patients in the PBD process can improved the efficacy of PBD and decreased the complications (transient chest pain) of the procedures. The patients with the deep sedation revealed less tachycardia and blood pressure rising and tolerated more pressure in balloon dilators.

Surgical approaches for achalasia and obesity: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis

PurposeSynchronous and metachronous presentations of achalasia and obesity are increasingly common. There is limited data to guide the combined or staged surgical approaches to these conditions.MethodsA systematic review (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) and patient-level meta-analysis of published cases were performed to examine the most effective surgical approach for patients with synchronous or metachronous presentations of achalasia and obesity.ResultsThirty-three studies with 93 patients were reviewed. Eighteen patients underwent concurrent achalasia and bariatric surgery, with the most common (n = 12, 72.2%) being laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy (LHM) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This combination achieved 68.9% excess weight loss and 100% remission of achalasia (mean follow-up: 3 years). Seven (6 RYGB, 1 biliopancreatic diversion) patients had bariatric surgery following achalasia surgery. Of these, all 6 RYGBs had satisfactory bariatric outcomes, with complete remission of their achalasia (mean follow-up: 1.8 years). Sixty-eight patients underwent myotomy following bariatric surgery; the majority (n = 55, 80.9%) were following RYGB. In this scenario, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) achieved higher treatment success than LHM (n = 33 of 35, 94.3% vs. n = 14 of 20, 70.0%, p = 0.021). Moreover, conversion to RYGB following a restrictive bariatric procedure during achalasia surgery was also associated with higher achalasia treatment success.ConclusionIn patients with concurrent achalasia and obesity, LHM and RYGB achieved good outcomes for both pathologies. For those with weight gain post-achalasia surgery, RYGB provided satisfactory weight loss, without adversely affecting achalasia symptoms. For those with achalasia after bariatric surgery, POEM and conversion to RYGB produced greater treatment success.

The correlation between helicobacter pylori and idiopathic achalasia: A case control study.

Idiopathic achalasia is a common and well-recognized primary esophageal motility disorder with unknown etiology and is characterized by the abnormality of esophageal body peristalsis associated with an impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The aim of this study is to explore the correlation between Helicobacter pylori and idiopathic achalasia. This study was conducted on 700 patients, with dysphagia, regurgitation, and non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP), who met our inclusion criteria. The mean ± SD age was 39.8 ± 11 (13-80 years), and 60% (420) of the participants were female. Of the participants, 108 had idiopathic achalasia and 105 were normal participants who were placed in the case and control groups, respectively. They were enrolled in the study based on high-resolution manometry. H. pylori was confirmed by a histological study. In the biopsy, specimens were taken by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Our results revealed that 71.3% and 45% of the participants were H. Pylori positive in the case and control groups, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) was 3.3 (95% CI: 1.80-5.99, P < 0.05), indicating a statistically significant association between H. Pylori infection and the group classification. The dominant presenting symptoms in achalasia were dysphagia (97.2%) and NCCP (80.5%), but regurgitation (65.7%) was a dominant symptom in the normal participants. Diverse autoimmune and apoptotic phenomena induced by H. Pylori influence the pathogenesis of idiopathic achalasia, suggesting an underlying link between H. Pylori infection and idiopathic achalasia. This correlation should be confirmed by other clinical and experimental studies.

Symptom duration is not associated with per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) failure.

Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a relatively novel technique to address achalasia; however, little is known about the efficacy of POEM for patients with long-standing achalasia. We hypothesize that patients with long-standing achalasia prior to intervention will be more recalcitrant to POEM than patients with symptoms for a short duration. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with achalasia who received a POEM at a single institution from 2012 to 2022. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on the time of symptom duration: < 1year, 1-3years, 4-10years, > 10years. POEM failure was defined as need for repeat intervention, symptom recurrence, and a high postoperative Eckart score. Demographic and clinical data were compared between cohorts. Measures of failure multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association between symptom duration and response to POEM. During the study period, 132 patients met inclusion criteria. Patient age at surgery, sex, BMI, Charleston-Deyo Comorbidity Index, and patients with diabetes with and without end organ complications, connective tissue diseases, and patients with ulcer diseases did not differ among cohorts. Patients who have had symptoms for greater than 10years had significantly more endoscopic interventions prior to their POEM (30% vs, 60% p = 0.002). Patients in all cohorts experienced the same number of symptoms post-POEM. Manometric measurements did not vary across cohorts after POEM. Symptom recurrence, need for repeat endoscopic intervention, repeat surgical intervention, or repeat POEM also did not vary across cohorts. Having symptoms of achalasia > 10years did not increase the odds POEM failure on multivariable logistical regression. These data suggest that longer symptom duration is not associated with increased rates of POEM failure. This is promising as clinicians should not exclude patients for POEM eligibility based on duration of symptoms alone.

Landscape of Psychological Profiles in Patients With Esophageal Achalasia.

Esophageal achalasia (EA) is a chronic esophageal dysmotility disease, of which psychological distress was poorly understood. This study aims to assess the status of psychosocial characteristics in EA and to determine the relationship between psychological distress and EA. Seventy pairs of age and gender-matched patients with EA and healthy control individuals were prospectively enrolled from December 2019 to April 2020 at our hospital. Demographic, psychosocial, and clinical data were obtained. Psychosocial assessments contained psychological distress (Symptom Checklist-90 Revised), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale-14), and stressful life events (Life Events Scale). Comparison for psychological parameters was made between patients with EA and controls as well as for EA before/after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to testify the association between psychological distress and achalasia symptoms. The mean course and Eckardt score of patients with EA were 4.26 ± 5.11 years and 6.63 ± 2.21, respectively. There was a significant difference between patients with EA and healthy individuals in Global Severity Index ( P = 0.039) and Positive Symptoms Total ( P = 0.041) for Symptom Checklist-90 Revised as well as positive intensity ( P = 0.011) for the Life Events Scale. Somatization ( P < 0.001), anxiety ( P = 0.021), anger-hostility ( P = 0.009), and others (appetite and sleep, P = 0.010) accounted for the most difference. Somatization was positively associated with chest pain ( P = 0.045). Two patients with EA developed recurrence and showed no relationship with psychological status. Psychological status was significantly improved after POEM. Psychological distress, especially somatization, was more prevalent in patients with EA than healthy controls. POEM seemed able to improve psychological distress.

Role of endoscopy in patients with achalasia.

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and peristalsis of the esophageal body. With the increasing prevalence of achalasia, interest in the role of endoscopy in its diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring is also growing. The major diagnostic modalities for achalasia include high-resolution manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and barium esophagography. Endoscopic assessment is important for early diagnosis to rule out diseases that mimic achalasia symptoms, such as pseudo-achalasia, esophageal cancer, esophageal webs, and eosinophilic esophagitis. The major endoscopic characteristics suggestive of achalasia include a widened esophageal lumen and food residue in the esophagus. Once diagnosed, achalasia can be treated either endoscopically or surgically. The preference for endoscopic treatment is increasing owing to its minimal invasiveness. Botulinum toxins, pneumatic balloon dilation, and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)are important endoscopic treatments. Previous studies have demonstrated excellent treatment outcomes for POEM, with >95% improvement in dysphagia, making POEM the mainstay treatment option for achalasia. Several studies have reported an increased risk of esophageal cancer in patients with achalasia. However, routine endoscopic surveillance remains controversial owing to the lack of sufficient data. Further studies on surveillance methods and duration are warranted to establish concordant guidelines for the endoscopic surveillance of achalasia.