Swedish Reference Group Research Articles

Antiretroviral treatment of HIV infection: Swedish recommendations 2005

On 2 earlier occasions, in 2002 and 2003, the Swedish Medical Products Agency (MPA) and the Swedish Reference Group for Antiviral Therapy (RAV) have jointly publicized recommendations for the treatment of HIV infection. A working group from the same expert team that produced the 2002 report has now revised the text again. Since the publication of the last treatment recommendations, 4 new medicines have become available: emtricitabine, atazanavir, fosamprenavir, and enfuvirtid. The last-mentioned belongs to a new class of HIV medications called fusion inhibitors (Box 1). It is likely that tipranavir will also be on the market soon. Simultaneously, the drug zalcitabin has been deregistered. The following updated recommendations parallel the earlier ones, but increased knowledge allows us to be more specific in our recommendations. Thus, it is now suggested that the initial treatment for HIV infection consist of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and 1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI); or 2 NRTIs and 1 protease inhibitor (PI). In the group of the NRTIs, stavudine is no longer recommended for this purpose. In the NNRTI group, efavirenz should be preferred to nevirapine, except under special circumstances. Finally, PIs ought to be boosted with ritonavir (PI/r). Also new are recommendations regarding treatment choices for patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or tuberculosis (TB). As in the case of the previous publication, recommendations are evidence-graded in accordance with the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, 2001 (see http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp#levels), and have been supplemented with references to newly-added sections and data not referred to in earlier background documentation.

Graves' Disease: A Long-Term Quality-of-Life Follow Up of Patients Randomized to Treatment with Antithyroid Drugs, Radioiodine, or Surgery

The effects of treatment modality for Graves' disease (GD) were studied with respect to long-term quality of life and present health status. A total of 179 patients with GD were randomized during the period 1983-1990 for treatment with antithyroid drugs, radioiodine, or surgery. A 36-item Short Form Health Status Survey questionnaire and specific questions for GD were sent to patients 14-21 years after randomization. Present medical records, and clinical and laboratory status were recorded. No major significant differences in quality of life among the three treatments were observed. Compared to a large Swedish reference group, all treatment groups had significantly lower scores for vitality (p < 0.05). The Mental Component Summary was lower for both the young medical, young surgical, and the older medical group (p < 0.05). Radioiodine-treated patients had a lower General Health score. Young medical patients (<35 years) had lower Mental Health scores (p < 0.05). There was also a strong trend, which barely met statistically significance, for older surgical and radioiodine groups for lower Mental Component Summary. GD patients have, compared with a large Swedish reference population, diminished vital and mental quality of life aspects even many years after treatment. The quality-of-life scores were not different among the three treatment modalities.

Self-perceived health and self-care among diabetic subjects with defective visionA comparison between subjects with threat of blindness and blind subjects

The aim of this study was to compare self-perceived health among diabetic patients who experienced threat of blindness with those who had already gone blind. Another aim was to explore different aspects of self-care in relation to self-perceived health among the subjects. Twenty-one diabetic patients under threat of becoming blind and 23 with diabetes-related blindness agreed to participate in the study. The participants were compared with an age- and gender-matched nondiabetic reference group. Self-perceived health was measured using the 63-item Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey (SWED-QUAL) questionnaire. Data on diabetes-related variables were collected from the patient's hospital records. An interview guide was created for measuring dimensions of self-care. Patients with threat of becoming blind showed better self-perceived health than blind patients, but no differences were found in comparison with the Swedish reference group. Blind patients scored lower in 6 of the 13 health domains and they reported more problems with diabetes self-care than patients with threat of becoming blind. One of the 13 health domains, role limitations due to physical health, seemed to be associated with impaired self-care although only a partial understanding could be demonstrated. The results show that blind patients need specific support to cope well with different self-care situations. A great challenge in future research in diabetes is to implement education programs suitable especially for patients who have gone blind because of diabetes.

Self-perceived health and self-care among diabetic subjects with defective vision: A comparison between subjects with threat of blindness and blind subjects

The aim of this study was to compare self-perceived health among diabetic patients who experienced threat of blindness with those who had already gone blind. Another aim was to explore different aspects of self-care in relation to self-perceived health among the subjects. Twenty-one diabetic patients under threat of becoming blind and 23 with diabetes-related blindness agreed to participate in the study. The participants were compared with an age- and gender-matched nondiabetic reference group. Self-perceived health was measured using the 63-item Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey (SWED-QUAL) questionnaire. Data on diabetes-related variables were collected from the patient's hospital records. An interview guide was created for measuring dimensions of self-care. Patients with threat of becoming blind showed better self-perceived health than blind patients, but no differences were found in comparison with the Swedish reference group. Blind patients scored lower in 6 of the 13 health domains and they reported more problems with diabetes self-care than patients with threat of becoming blind. One of the 13 health domains, role limitations due to physical health, seemed to be associated with impaired self-care although only a partial understanding could be demonstrated. The results show that blind patients need specific support to cope well with different self-care situations. A great challenge in future research in diabetes is to implement education programs suitable especially for patients who have gone blind because of diabetes.

Comparison of daptomycin MIC results by DIN, NCCLS, SFM, and SRGA methods for 297 Gram-positive organisms

Daptomycin is a novel lipopeptide antibiotic with potent in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-positive pathogens. For daptomycin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recommends the use of broth containing physiological levels of calcium (50 μg/ml). The daptomycin susceptibility of 297 organisms was determined by NCCLS (Mueller–Hinton (MH) broth), Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN; isotonic broth), Société Française de Microbiologie (SFM; three batches MH agar), and Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA; PDM agar). All media were supplemented to 50 μg/ml Ca 2+. There was good correlation between DIN and SFM methods (for staphylococci) with NCCLS results. Enterococci MICs using SFM methods were one to three dilutions lower and pneumococci results were one dilution higher than NCCLS. SRGA results were higher than NCCLS by one to four dilutions. Use of isotonic agar is an accepted alternative to isosensitest agar for the DIN method.

Evaluation of a cefoxitin 30 microg disc on Iso-Sensitest agar for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

To evaluate the performance of a cefoxitin 30 microg disc on Iso-Sensitest agar, using a semi-confluent inoculum and overnight incubation at 35-36 degrees C, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). A total of 457 S. aureus, including 190 MRSA of several defined PFGE types and a number of low-level resistant isolates, were tested with a cefoxitin 30 microg disc on Iso-Sensitest agar, using a semi-confluent inoculum and overnight incubation at 35-36 degrees C. This method was compared with the standard SRGA (Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics) method (oxacillin 1 microg disc on Iso-Sensitest agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood, confluent growth and 24 h incubation in ambient air at 30 degrees C). The cefoxitin method was excellent, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% using an interpretative zone diameter of S > or = 29 mm and R < 29 mm. Its performance was much better than the SRGA method, which with this collection of difficult strains had a sensitivity of only 78% using the current breakpoint of S > or = 12 mm. We suggest that the cefoxitin method should replace that currently recommended by the SRGA for the detection of MRSA, and that it would fit well into BSAC methodology.

A new method for normalized interpretation of antimicrobial resistance from disk test results for comparative purposes

To evaluate a calibration method for disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility tests, using zone diameter values generated in the individual laboratory as the internal calibrator for combinations of antibiotic and bacterial species. The high-zone side of zone histogram distributions was first analyzed by moving averages to determine the peak position of the susceptible population. The accumulated percentages of isolates for the high zone diameter values were calculated and converted into probit values. The normal distribution of the ideal population of susceptible strains was then determined by using the least-squares method for probit values against zone diameters, and the ideal population was thereby defined, including mean and standard deviation. Zone diameter values were obtained from laboratories at the Karolinska Hospital (KS) and Växjö Hospital (VX), and from two laboratories (LabA, LabB) in Argentina. The method relies on well standardized disk tests, but is independent of differences in MIC limits and zone breakpoints, and does not require the use of reference strains. Resistance was tentatively set at below 3 SD from the calculated, ideal mean zone diameter of the susceptible population. The method, called normalized interpretation of antimicrobial resistance, was tested on results from the KS and VX clinical microbiology laboratories, using the disk diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility tests, and for two bacterial species, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. In total, 114 217 test results were included for the clinical isolates, and 3582 test results for control strains. The methodology at KS and VX followed the standard of the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA). Zone diameter histograms for control strains were first analyzed to validate the procedure, and a comparison of actual means with the calculated means showed a correlation coefficient of r = 0.998. Results for clinical isolates at the two laboratories showed an excellent agreement for 54 of 57 combinations of antibiotic and bacterial species between normalized interpretations and the interpretations given by the laboratories. There were difficulties with E. coli and mecillinam, and S. aureus and tetracycline and rifampicin. The method was also tested on results from two laboratories using the NCCLS standard, and preliminary results showed very good agreement with quality-controlled laboratory interpretations. The normalized resistance interpretation offers a new approach to comparative surveillance studies whereby the inhibition zone diameter results from disk tests in clinical laboratories can be used for calibration of the test.

SWEDRES 2001 - report on Swedish antibiotic use and resistance in human medicine

Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing threat to human health. Although the prevalence of resistant bacteria in Sweden is low in comparison to many other countries, international trends are alarming and resistance genes do not respect any borders. Recently, the first yearly report on surveillance and control systems for both antibiotic use and resistance was published and made available on the Internet (1). The report is a joint collaboration between the Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.smittskyddsinstitutet.se&amp;quot;&amp;gt; http://www.smittskyddsinstitutet.se&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;) and the Swedish Strategic Programme for the Rational Use of Antimicrobial Agents (STRAMA, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.strama.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt; http://www.strama.org&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;). This first yearly report covers data from 2001 and from previous years. Most resistance data have been routinely collected from the local laboratories by the SMI and the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics and its subcommittee on methodology (SRGA-M, &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.srga.org/&amp;quot;&amp;gt; http://www.srga.org/&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;), but data on specific organisms for the SWEDRES Report were also sent from individual contributing laboratories.&amp;nbsp;

Calibration of fusidic acid disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus

Single strain regression analysis, SRA, was used to calibrate disk diffusion fusidic acid susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus in two laboratories using different standard methods but the same interpretative MIC limits. SRA equation constants were calculated using five different fusidic acid disk contents (1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150 microg). These disks were tested on five separate occasions against quality control strain S. aureus ATCC 29213. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) method was employed in Tartu, Estonia (TE) and the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA) method in Sweden at the Karolinska Hospital (KS). SRA constants obtained were used for calculating zone breakpoints corresponding to MIC breakpoints recommended by the SRGA (S < or = 0.5 mg/L, R > or = 1 mg/L). Zone diameter histograms from KS, performed with a 50 microg disk, and from TE, using a 10 microg disk, showed a clustering of wild type strains around 41 mm and 30 mm, respectively, reflecting differences in methodology. Zone breakpoints calculated from the equations were validated by comparison with the histograms. Breakpoints were also calculated for a suggested lower disk content in Sweden, 10 microg, and validated in tests of clinical isolates and by histogram analysis.

Symptoms and Functional Health Status of Individuals with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS)

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is an inherited connective tissue disorder that can have a substantial impact on daily life. The aims of this study were to describe the symptoms reported in a group of individuals with EDS and to investigate the impact on functional health status by means of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). Seventy-seven individuals, members of the Swedish EDS Association, completed 2 mailed questionnaires. The most frequent symptoms were related to activity, e.g., joint problems (75%), to pain (71%), and to skin/tissue (52%). Pain was reported by 37 individuals (48%) as their most severe symptom. The SIP results showed an overall mean score of 13.0 (females 13.9, males 5.6), compared with a Swedish reference group with a SIP score 1.3. Women with EDS reported a better functional health status than females with rheumatoid arthritis (overall SIP score 13.9 versus 21.4). In comparison with women with fibromyalgia, the EDS females rated their functional health status as worse on the physical dimension (p <0.05) and the subscale home management (p <0.05), and as better on the subscale work (p <0.05). Impact of EDS on the individual's daily life needs to be acknowledged, assessed, and evaluated in healthcare.

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of enterococci in intensive care units in Sweden evaluated by different MIC breakpoint systems.

Three hundred and twenty-two (322) clinical isolates were collected from patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at eight Swedish hospitals between December 1996 and December 1998. Of the isolates, 244 (76%) were Enterococcus faecalis, 74 (23%) were Enterococcus faecium and four (1%) were other Enterococcus spp. MICs of ampicillin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, gentamicin, streptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid and evernimicin were determined by Etest. Susceptible and resistant isolates were defined according to the species-related MIC breakpoints of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) and the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA). Tentative breakpoints were applied for new/experimental antibiotics. Multidrug resistance among enterococci in ICUs is not uncommon in Sweden, particularly among E. faecium, and includes ampicillin resistance and concomitant resistance to fluoroquinolones. Almost 20% of E. faecalis isolates showed high-level resistance to gentamicin and concomitant resistance to fluoroquinolones. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci were only found sporadically. Among the new antimicrobial agents, linezolid and evernimicin showed the best activity against all enterococcal isolates. There was good concordance between the BSAC, NCCLS and SRGA breakpoints in detecting resistance. When applying the SRGA breakpoints for susceptibility, isolates were more frequently interpreted as intermediate. This might indicate earlier detection of emerging resistance using the SRGA breakpoint when the native population is considered susceptible, but with the risk that isolates belonging to the native susceptible population will be incorrectly interpreted as intermediate.

MIC determination of fusidic acid and of ciprofloxacin using multidisk diffusion tests

To investigate the possibility of estimating the MICs of fusidic acid and ciprofloxacin for bacterial isolates using series of antibiotic disk concentrations in diffusion tests, so-called M-tests. Thirty Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis strains were tested for fusidic acid susceptibility. Sixty-one clinical isolates of eight bacterial species were tested for ciprofloxacin susceptibility. Disk diffusion was standardized according to the Swedish reference group for antibiotics (SRGA). For fusidic acid, a series of disks (1.5, 5.0, 15, 50 and 150 microg) was used. Ciprofloxacin was applied in four different diffusion sources (1, 3, 10 and 30 microg) on a single strip, the M-strip, and used. True MIC values were determined using the standardized agar dilution method according to the SRGA. Single-strain regression analysis (SRA) was employed to calculate critical concentration equivalents (Qzero). Fusidic acid and ciprofloxacin critical concentrations were determined for the bacterial isolates. The mean conversion factors for Qzero to yield the true MIC were 2.06 (range 0.34-8.9) for fusidic acid and 2.05 (range 0.37-8.1) for ciprofloxacin. There was a correlation between true MIC values (all MICs expressed as 2 log + 9) and the calculated MIC values (Qzero x conversion factor) for both fusidic acid (R = 0.9822) and ciprofloxacin (R = 0.9696). MIC values of clinical isolates can be estimated using SRA calculations on zone measurements in disk tests with several concentrations of the antibiotic in diffusion sources.

Apparent differences in antimicrobial susceptibility as a consequence of national guidelines

Apparent differences in antimicrobial susceptibility as a consequence of national guidelines

Calibration of the disk diffusion test for trovafloxacin susceptibility testing of four anaerobic species

To study trovafloxacin susceptibility among clinical isolates of four anaerobic bacterial species using minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) determinations, E test assays and disk diffusion test results and to calibrate the disk diffusion method for these species using single strain regression analysis (SRA). One-hundred and eighty-seven clinical isolates of four anaerobic bacterial species were included. Trovafloxacin MIC determinations were performed using the agar dilution technique and MIC estimations using the E test. The disk diffusion test was performed according to Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics standardization. NCCLS limits for susceptibility categories were applied. SRA was performed using 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 microg trovafloxacin disk contents and ATCC control strains. The regression lines obtained permitted the calculation of zone equivalents to MIC limits as well as an evaluation of various disk potencies. Trovafloxacin susceptibility (S + I) was noted in 98.9, 100, 100, and 97% of Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Clostridium perfringens, and Peptostreptococcus magnus strains, respectively, as judged by MIC determinations. Agar dilution and E test estimations gave the same results, but E test values were consistently lower than MIC values by the reference method. Regression lines calculated for the four species using SRA showed different equation constants indicating species-related differences. Interpretive zone diameter breakpoints were calculated for the four species and used for the interpretation of susceptibility. The disk diffusion test was successfully calibrated for trovafloxacin susceptibility testing of four anaerobic species using single strain regression analysis, SRA. There was a good agreement between the results of MIC-tests and disk testing. Interpretive errors of type I are prone to occur among Bacteroides isolates and might require species-related MIC limits. SRA calculations permitted the testing of the effect of different disk potencies on inhibition zones produced at the interpretive MIC limits. Criteria for the selection of a minimal disk content showed that 5 microg trovafloxacin is sufficient, but a 10 microg disk will safeguard against residual laboratory variation without producing too large inhibition zones for very susceptible strains.

Fusidic acid disk diffusion testing of clostridium difficile can be calibrated using single-strain regression analysis.

Single-strain regression analysis (SRA) was employed to calibrate the disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility test for fusidic acid and Clostridium difficile. MIC determinations of 40 clinical isolates of C. difficile were performed with the E-test. The disk diffusion test was standardized according to the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA). Disks used for SRA contained 1.5, 5, 15, 50 and 150 microg fusidic acid and the routine disk contained 50 microg fusidic acid. A control strain, ATCC 9689, was also tested. SRA constants A and B of the regression lines were calculated. This permitted the determination of zone breakpoints for C. difficile. When applying the pharmacological MIC S and R limits set by SRGA to the E-test results I strain of C. difficile was interpreted as resistant. Zone breakpoints corresponding to the pharmacological MIC limits and calculated using the mean SRA constants for the 40 clinical isolates lead to all strains being interpreted as susceptible. SRA calculations enable laboratories to set up calibrated disk tests with species-related and laboratory-specific interpretations.

High frequency of antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative isolates in intensive care units at 10 Swedish hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the resistance rates among Gram-negative isolates in Swedish intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: During 1994-95, members of the Swedish Study Group collected, on clinical indication, 502 consecutive initial isolates of Gram-negative bacteria from patients admitted to ICUs at 10 Swedish hospitals and performed minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations with the Etest. Breakpoints were defined according to the criteria of the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA). RESULTS: The distribution of bacterial species was: Escherichia coli > Klebsiella spp. > Enterobacter spp. > Pseudomonas aeruginosa > Haemophilus spp. > Proteus spp. > Stenotrophomonas maltophilia > Citrobacter spp. > Acinetobacter > Pseudomonas spp. > Morganella morganii > Serratia spp. Together these constituted 97% of all isolates. The frequencies of resistance for all the initial Gram-negative isolates were: ceftazidime 6.8%, cefotaxime 14.9%, ceftriaxone 18.5%, cefuroxime 44.1%, ciprofloxacin 4.2%, co-trimoxazole 17.8%, gentamicin 5.8%, imipenem 8.6%, piperacillin 20.2%, piperacillin/tazobactam 12.9% and tobramycin 5.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Among Gram-negative isolates in Swedish ICUs, a very high frequency of resistance was seen to cefuroxime, and rather high frequencies of resistance to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, piperacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam. These drugs cannot be recommended for further use as empirical monotherapy for severe ICU-acquired Gram-negative infections in ICUs in Sweden.

Comparison of 30 μg and 120 μg gentamicin disks for the prediction of gentamicin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis

Single strain regression analysis was performed on PDM II medium for E. faecalis with 10, 30 and 120 micrograms gentamicin disks using E. faecalis, strain ATCC 29212 as the reference. This method permits the calculation of zone diameters corresponding to different MIC values for different disk contents. The lack of discrimination between normal low-level resistant strains and high-level resistance using the 10 micrograms disk was confirmed. However, both the 30 micrograms and 120 micrograms disks seemed to provide a separation of the normal low-level gentamicin-resistant population from strains with increased resistance. Since the 30 micrograms disk is used routinely in some countries, there should be no need for an extra high content disk in these laboratories. This was confirmed when 96 clinical isolates of E. faecalis were analysed and the results of routine disk diffusion tests were compared with the MIC values. Two of the strains showed high-level gentamicin resistance (greater than 2000 mg/l) and produced no zone of inhibition. The other 94 isolates showed gentamicin MIC values between 4-16 mg/l, and 72 of the MIC results were 8 mg/l. The zone diameters for these strains ranged between 15 and 25 mm with a mean of 18.2 and a median value of 18 mm. In order to include statistical considerations of the zone size populations for setting of breakpoints, a study of gentamicin zone size distributions was performed for several bacterial species. Inhibition zone diameter values around the 30 micrograms gentamicin disk for 2079 clinical isolates of E. faecalis, 2268 S. aureus, 3201 E. coli and 547 strains of P. mirabilis from different years were plotted as histograms. Tests for agreement with a Gaussian distribution showed that the histograms were slightly peaked and skewed towards higher zone values. Parametric and non-parametric statistical tests were compared and the results showed that means and medians were very similar and that parametric fractile estimations at the lower end of the histogram populations were conservative and could be used in view of a slightly lower rate of false resistance. The 1% parametric fractile of 12 mm was selected as a suitable breakpoint for the identification of normal, low-level resistant isolates of E. faecalis using the standardized disk test of the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics.

Types of interpretive errors in susceptibility testing. Zone breakpoints for norfloxacin disk diffusion testing.

A total of 548 strains of the eleven most common urinary tract pathogens were investigated for possible errors in norfloxacin susceptibility tests comparing MIC determinations with disk diffusion assays. Most strains were found to be sensitive with MIC-90 values below 1.0 for the Enterobacteriaceae while the classical nalidixic acid resistant species, the gram-positive bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were less susceptible to norfloxacin with MIC-90 above 1.0 mg/l. MIC-values close to interpretive MIC-limits were recorded for S. faecalis and S. agalactiae using the recommendations of the national Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (susceptible, S less than or equal to 4.0) and for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus using the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA) standards (S less than or equal to 1.0). Susceptibility interpretations for these species showed a lack of accuracy consistent with methodological problems of reproducibility, an error called type I. The changes in the MIC-limits required for these strains to correct the error would be S less than or equal to 4 for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, S less than or equal to 8 for S. agalactiae and S less than or equal to 0.5 for S. faecalis. A type II error, occurring when a bacterial species shows a regression line different from the regular line, was also identified for S. saprophyticus. The use of breakpoints derived from single strains regression analysis corrected this error and also reduced the frequency of similar misinterpretations in other species. The term "species-specific MIC-limits" should be introduced along with the established concept of "species-specific interpretive zone breakpoints" to allow for the correction of type I interpretive errors. Type II errors can be corrected by using species-specific interpretive breakpoints, either issued by reference laboratories or derived by calculations from single-strain regression analysis in the individual laboratory.

Laboratory- and species-specific interpretive breakpoints for disk diffusion tests of chloramphenicol susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae.

A total of 601 clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae isolated in six different regions of Sweden were tested for chloramphenicol susceptibility by using agar dilution MIC determinations and disk diffusion tests. For seven strains MICs were 4 micrograms/ml or higher, and for one strain the MIC was 2 micrograms/ml. All eight strains produced chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. For the remaining 593 strains, MICs were less than or equal to 1 microgram/ml, and the MICs for 50% and 90% of the strains were both 0.5 microgram/ml. Disk diffusion tests carried out by using revised interpretive criteria introduced in 1984 by the Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics correctly identified the 593 strains as susceptible and the 8 strains as resistant. Quality assessments were performed in 29 clinical microbiology laboratories. The revised criteria for chloramphenicol disk diffusion testing gave rise to false resistance results in some laboratories. The interpretive accuracy improved when the interlaboratory variation was compensated for by using adjusted breakpoints. Such revision was possible through peak correction, single-strain regression analysis, and standard curve regression analysis. Peak-corrected breakpoints improved the accuracy from an overall incidence of false-resistant isolates of 4.4% to 2.3%. Single-strain regression analysis and standard curve regression analysis provided laboratory- and species-specific breakpoints which reduced false resistance rates of 0.14% and 0%, respectively.

Determination of species- and laboratory-related interpretive breakpoints for doxycycline susceptibility testing using single-strain regression analysis.

Single-strain Regression Analysis (SRA) was performed for doxycycline on a total of 68 bacterial strains representing 16 different species. Species- and laboratory-related zone diameter breakpoints were determined and compared with histograms of zone diameter values obtained from 942 routine susceptibility tests. Calculated breakpoints were similar within individual species. When considering the homogeneity of susceptibility groups within bacterial species, the calculated breakpoints gave rise to relatively few interpretive errors. In contrast, general breakpoints for doxycycline as recommended by the Swedish Reference Group (SRG) (R less than = 20 mm and S greater than = 26 mm) would give rise to a high proportion of false interpretations in the present laboratory. Fifty-three per cent of H.influenzae strains would have been assigned to the wrong susceptibility group. For E.coli and K.pneumoniae, 22 and 35 per cent, respectively, would have been erroneously categorized using SRG breakpoints. E.cloacae and E.aerogenes would have been assigned another category in 39 and 50 per cent, respectively. The procedure for setting species-specific and laboratory-related interpretive breakpoints is described. Determination of species- and laboratory-related interpretive breakpoints using SRA provides a new approach towards improved accuracy of disc-diffusion susceptibility testing.