Swedish Primary Care Research Articles

Better with GPs as managers? – Variation in perceptions of feedback messages, goal-clarity and performance across manager´s in Swedish primary care

BackgroundPrimary care in several countries is developing towards team-based and multi-professional care, requiring leadership and management capabilities at the primary care practice level. This article reports findings from a study of primary care managers in Sweden, focusing variation in performance and perceptions of feedback messages and goal-clarity, depending on managers’ professional background.MethodsThe study was designed as a cross-sectional analysis of primary care practice managers’ perceptions combined with registered data on patient-reported performance. Managers perceptions was collected through a survey to all 1 327 primary care practice managers in Sweden. Data about patient-reported performance was collected from the 2021 National Patient Survey in primary care. We used bivariate (Pearson correlation) and multivariate (ordinary least square regression analysis) statistical methods to describe and analyse the possible association between managers’ background, responses to survey statements and patient-reported performance.ResultsBoth GP and non-GP managers had positive perceptions of the quality and support of feedback messages from professional committees focusing medical quality indicators, although managers perceived that the feedback facilitated improvement work to a lower degree. Feedback from the regions as payers scored consistently lower in all dimensions, especially among GP-managers. Results from regression analysis indicate that GP-managers correlate with better patient-reported performance when controlling for selected primary care practice and managerial characteristics. A significant positive relationship with patient-reported performance was also found for female managers, a smaller size of the primary care practice and a good staffing situation of GPs.ConclusionsBoth GP and non-GP managers rated the quality and support of feedback messages from professional committees higher than feedback from regions as payers. Differences in perceptions were especially striking among GP-managers. Patient-reported performance was significantly better in primary care practices managed by GPs and female managers. Variables reflecting structural and organizational, rather than managerial, characteristics contributed with additional explanations behind the variation in patient-reported performance across primary care practices. As we cannot exclude reversed causality, the findings may reflect that GPs are more likely to accept being a manager of a primary care practice with favourable characteristics.

PARACETAMOL AND BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL IN 45211 PATIENTS TREATED FOR HYPERTENSION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY FROM THE SWEDISH PRIMARY CARE CARDIOVASCULAR DATABASE

Objective: Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is widely recommended for analgetic and antipyretic indications due to its perceived high safety. However, studies have shown contradicting results regarding the effect of paracetamol on blood pressure (BP). We aimed to study how regular paracetamol use could affect BP control in patients on antihypertensive mediation. Design and method: Data for 42 511 patients attending primary care and a documented diagnosis of hypertension before 2007 (to rule out new onset of hypertension) and with 1 or more BP measurements recorded 2007–2008 were collected from the Swedish primary care cardiovascular database (SPCCD). There were 8 367 paracetamol users, defined as 1 or more dispensed prescriptions 6 months prior to the last BP recorded, and 34 144 non-users of paracetamol. Target BP was set to <140/90 mm Hg. Dose-response relationships were examined by the number of defined daily doses (DDD) dispensed. Multivariate linear regression analyses accounted for potential confounders. Results: Paracetamol users were older, had higher creatinine levels, more often diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and musculoskeletal diseases, and lower educational level than non-users (all P < 0.001), but attained target systolic and diastolic BP to similar degrees (58 and 93% vs 58 and 92%, respectively). There were no relations between number of DDD and systolic and diastolic BP in paracetamol users, also when DDD deciles were evaluated to account for the low proportion of patients with high DDD dispensed (all R2 <0.001). Sensitivity analyses including dispensed prescriptions of paracetamol 3 months before and 6 months after the first BP measurement provided similar results. Paracetamol had no impact on attaining target BP in subgroup analyses on patients with diabetes, musculoskeletal diseases, with concomitant use of NSAID, or in relation to number of antihypertensive medications (suggesting severity of hypertensive disease). Conclusions: Concomitant use of paracetamol does not impair the ability to reach target BP in hypertensive patients. No dose-response relationship was observed between dispensed prescriptions of paracetamol and BP.

Experiences of participating in a problem-solving intervention with workplace involvement in Swedish primary health care: a qualitative study from rehabilitation coordinator's, employee's, and manager's perspectives

BackgroundWork-directed interventions that include problem-solving can reduce the number of sickness absence days. The effect of combining a problem-solving intervention with involvement of the employer is currently being tested in primary care in Sweden for employees on sickness absence due to common mental disorders (PROSA trial). The current study is part of the PROSA trial and has a two-fold aim: 1) to explore the experiences of participating in a problem-solving intervention with workplace involvement aimed at reducing sickness absence in employees with common mental disorders, delivered in Swedish primary health care, and 2) to identify facilitators of and barriers to participate in the intervention. Both aims targeted rehabilitation coordinators, employees on sickness absence, and first-line managers.MethodsData were collected from semi-structured interviews with participants from the PROSA intervention group; rehabilitation coordinators (n = 8), employees (n = 13), and first-line managers (n = 8). Content analysis was used to analyse the data and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to group the data according to four contextual domains. One theme describing the participation experiences was established for each domain. Facilitators and barriers for each domain and stakeholder group were identified.ResultsThe stakeholders experienced the intervention as supportive in identifying problems and solutions and enabling a dialogue between them. However, the intervention was considered demanding and good relationships between the stakeholders were needed. Facilitating factors were the manual and work sheets which the coordinators were provided with, and the manager being involved early in the return-to-work process. Barriers were the number of on-site meetings, disagreements and conflicts between employees and first-line managers, and symptom severity.ConclusionsSeeing the workplace as an integral part of the intervention by always conducting a three-part meeting enabled a dialogue that can be used to identify and address disagreements, to explain CMD symptoms, and how these can be handled at the workplace. We suggest allocating time towards developing good relationships, provide RCs with training in handling disagreements, and additional knowledge about factors in the employee’s psychosocial work environment that can impair or promote health to increase the RCs ability to support the employee and manager.

Validation of a single question to measure internal health locus of control in Swedish primary care.

Behavioral risk factors are highlighted in the prevention of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Screening for health locus of control could be a feasible way to better identify individuals who could benefit from preventive behavioral change interventions. The aim of the study was to investigate the correlation between a single question measuring internal health locus of control (IHLC) and the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale (MHLC) and to assess how IHLC relates to the General Self-Efficacy scale (GSE) in a primary care setting. Primary care patients, aged 18 and older, attending three primary care centers in southwest Sweden were consecutively asked to anonymously participate in the study. The patients were given a questionnaire and instructed to return the questionnaire in a sealed box in the waiting room. In all, 519 patients were included. The correlation between MHLC Internality and IHLC was weak (r = 0.21, p < 0.001). An increase of one point on the internality scale of the MHLC gave an odds ratio of 1.19 (95% CI 1.11-1.28) for reporting high IHLC, and thus a five-point increase gave a doubled likelihood, OR = 2.40, CI 1.67-3.46. The results for the other scales of the MHLC and GSE were similar. In this study, we found weak but statistically significant support for the single-question IHLC as a measure of internal health locus of control. Given that the correlation was weak, we recommend using the MHLC when possible.

District Nurses’ Experiences of Practice in Caring for People with Mental Ill-Health in Swedish Primary Care

Mental ill-health is one of the greatest public health challenges in Sweden, and it is estimated that every third person seeking primary care in the country suffers from mental ill-health. Without proper treatment at an early stage, mental ill-health may lead to long-term illness and have a significant impact on functional ability. As district nurses are specialists in public health nursing, they have been pointed out as having a key role in the prevention and management of mental ill-health. The aim was to explore district nurses’ practice in caring for people with mental ill-health within primary health care. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with district nurses (n = 18) and the transcribed text was subjected to qualitative content analysis. The result was formulated as several subthemes, eventually developed into three themes: Practicing within an organisation where traditional attitudes are impediments, Perceiving mental healthcare as not being an obvious part of district nursing, Working as fellow human beings rather than “professionals”. The findings indicate that district nurses feel uncertainty in their practice in this area. Working independently with mental ill-health was not always considered socially acceptable among district nurses. Despite these challenges they tried to remain involved without becoming emotionally overwhelmed. They also strived to meet the needs of these patients with ‘small things’, that could be effective and a part of recovery-oriented practice, even if they might be defined as unprofessional, and their efficacy negated.

Health care professionals’ experiences of supporting persons with metabolic risk factors to increase their physical activity level – a qualitative study in primary care

Objective To be regularly physically active is of major importance for the health of people with metabolic risk factors. Many of these persons are insufficiently active and in need of support. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators perceived by health care professionals’ within Swedish primary care in their work to support persons with metabolic risk factors to increase their physical activity. Design A qualitative design with focus group discussions was used. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis with a manifest, inductive approach. Setting Primary health care in five Swedish healthcare regions. Subjects Nine physiotherapists, ten physicians and five nurses participated in six digital focus group discussions including two to six participants. Results Barriers and facilitators to supporting persons with metabolic risk factors to increase their physical activity were found within four generic categories, where the barriers and facilitators related to each generic category: ‘Patient readiness for change’, ‘Supporting the process of change’, ‘The professional role’, and ‘The organisation of primary care’. Conclusion The findings suggests that barriers and facilitators for supporting patients with metabolic risk factors can be found at several levels within primary care, from individual patient and the health care professionals to the organisational level. In the primary care setting, this should be highlighted when implementing support to increase physical activity in people with metabolic risk factors. KEY POINTS Health care professionals within primary care are in a position to support people with metabolic risk factors to increase their physical activity. Barriers and facilitators to support the patients should be addressed at several levels within primary care. The study highlights factors on multiple levels such as professional responsibility, organisational prioritisation and resources, and the challenge to motivate behaviour change.

Patient factors associated with receipt of psychological and pharmacological treatments among individuals with common mental disorders in a Swedish primary care setting.

Psychological and pharmacological therapies are the recommended first-line treatments for common mental disorders (CMDs) but may not be universally accessible or utilised. To determine the extent to which primary care patients with CMDs receive treatment and the impact of sociodemographic, work-related and clinical factors on treatment receipt. National registers were used to identify all Stockholm County residents aged 19-64 years who had received at least one CMD diagnosis (depression, anxiety, stress-related) in primary care between 2014 and 2018. Individuals were followed from the date of their first observed CMD diagnosis until the end of 2019 to determine treatment receipt. Associations between patient factors and treatment group were examined using multinomial logistic regression. Among 223 271 individuals with CMDs, 30.6% received pharmacotherapy only, 16.5% received psychological therapy only, 43.1% received both and 9.8% had no treatment. The odds of receiving any treatment were lower among males (odds ratio (OR) range = 0.76 to 0.92, 95% CI[minimum, maximum] 0.74 to 0.95), individuals born outside of Sweden (OR range = 0.67 to 0.93, 95% CI[minimum, maximum] 0.65 to 0.99) and those with stress-related disorders only (OR range = 0.21 to 0.51, 95% CI[minimum, maximum] 0.20 to 0.53). Among the patient factors examined, CMD diagnostic group, prior treatment in secondary psychiatric care and age made the largest contributions to the model (R2 difference: 16.05%, 1.72% and 1.61%, respectively). Although over 90% of primary care patients with CMDs received pharmacological and/or psychological therapy, specific patient groups were less likely to receive treatment.

Telemedicine in Swedish primary health care - a web-based survey exploring patient satisfaction

BackgroundDirect-to-consumer telemedicine (TM), with patients having access to a physician via video or text chat, has gradually been introduced into Swedish primary care during the last two decades. Earlier studies have concluded that patients were generally satisfied with TM and the satisfaction rate was consistently above 80% and comparable with in-person visits. Despite the number of studies looking at user experience, studies assessing what factors influence patient satisfaction are lacking. To further develop digital care, it is important to explore the patients’ opinions of this relatively new phenomenon. The primary aim of this study was to explore patient opinions regarding satisfaction with TM-provided care, based on different age groups, sex, symptoms, and which type of health care professional they were assessed by.MethodsThe study was a quantitative web survey performed in 2020–2021 in which 688 patients using a TM provider in Southern Sweden responded. The results were analysed using Chi-2 test with the main outputs; satisfaction level and percentage that would use TM for similar symptoms in the future.ResultsThe results from the survey population show that patients that were assessed by a doctor were more likely to intend to use TM in the future and were more satisfied with the visit than patients assessed by a nurse. Our results also show that patients older than 70 years of age were less likely to use TM again compared to the total population.ConclusionThis study shows that patient satisfaction with TM varied depending on the patient’s age. The older patients were less satisfied than their younger equivalents. For patient satisfaction to be high, it was also crucial which health care provider the patient had been assessed by. The patients were more satisfied when assessed by a doctor than by a nurse. In addition, the study shows that patient satisfaction with TM was generally comparable to traditional care.

Does problem-based learning improve patient empowerment and cardiac risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease in a Swedish primary care setting? A long-term prospective, randomised, parallel single randomised trial (COR-PRIM)

ObjectivesTo investigate long-term effects of a 1-year problem-based learning (PBL) on self-management and cardiac risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).DesignA prospective, randomised, parallel single centre trial.SettingsPrimary care...

Prerequisites for implementing physical activity on prescription for children with obesity in paediatric health care: A cross-sectional survey.

Physical inactivity is a main driver of childhood obesity that tracks into adulthood, making it crucial to address early in life. Swedish physical activity on prescription (PAP) is an effective intervention for increasing physical activity levels in adults and is being implemented in primary care in Sweden. Before implementing PAP for children, both intervention effectiveness and implementation prerequisites need to be examined. Framed by the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) domains, this study aimed to investigate perceptions of PAP amongst paediatric staff and managers working with children with obesity, as well as acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and barriers and facilitators for implementing PAP in paediatric health care. Staff and managers in 28 paediatric outpatient clinics in western Sweden were surveyed using validated implementation instruments and open-ended questions. Data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Qualitative data were categorised into NPT domains. The survey response rate was 54% (125/229). Most respondents (82%) reported PAP to be familiar and many (56%) perceived it as a normal part of work; nurses and physiotherapists to a greater extent (p < 0.001). This was anticipated to increase in the future (82%), especially amongst those with the longest work experience (p = 0.012). Respondents reported seeing the potential value in their work with PAP (77%), being open to working in new ways to use PAP (94%), and having confidence in their colleagues' ability to use PAP (77%). Barriers and facilitators were found in all the NPT domains, mainly collective action and reflexive monitoring, where, for example, inadequacies of education, resources, and research on PAP for children were reported as barriers. Most respondents agreed that PAP was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible (71% to 88%). PAP is familiar and perceived as an acceptable, appropriate, and feasible intervention, and by many viewed as a normal part of clinical routines in paediatric outpatient clinics in western Sweden, especially by physiotherapists and nurses. Barriers and faciliators are mainly related to collective action and reflexive monitoring. The wide acceptance demonstrates receptiveness to PAP as an intervention to promote an active lifestyle for children with obesity.

How health care professionals handle limited resources in primary care – an interview study

IntroductionHealth care systems around the world are struggling with limited resources, in relation to the prevailing health care need. An accessible primary care is an important part of the solution for how to provide affordable care for the population and reduce pressure on the overall health care system such as unnecessary hospital stays and associated costs. As primary care constitutes an important first line of healthcare, the task of prioritising and deciding what to do and for whom lies in practice, primarily with the primary care professionals. Thus, the decisions and behaviour of primary care professionals have a central role in achieving good and equal health in the population. The aim of this study is to explore how primary health care professionals handle situations with limited resources and enhance our knowledge of priorities in practice. MethodsSemi-structured interviews with 14 health care professionals (7 nurses, 7 physicians) working in Swedish primary care were interviewed. Data were analysed inductively with content analysis.FindingsThree main categories were found: Influx of patients; Structural conditions; and Actions. Each category illustrates an important aspect for what primary care professionals do to achieve good and equal care. The influx of patients concerned what the professionals handled in terms of patients’ healthcare needs and patient behaviour. Structural conditions consisted of policies and goals set for primary care, competence availability, technical systems, and organisational culture. To handle situations due to limited resources, professionals performed different actions: matching health care needs with professionals’ competency, defining care needs to suit booking systems appointments, giving care at the inappropriate health care level, rearranging workhours, and passing on the decision making.ConclusionPriorities in primary care are not, “one fits all” solution. Our study shows that priorities in primary care comprise of ongoing daily processes that are adapted to the situation, context of patient influx, and structural conditions. Healthcare professional’s actions for how influx of patients’ is handled in relation to limited resources, are created, and shaped within this context which also sets the boundaries for their actions.

District nurses’ experiences of giving initial health care assessment to young adults applying for mental illness in primary care: a qualitative interview study

Mental illness among young adults is increasing both nationally and internationally. Primary care's mission is to be the hub of health care and to offer high-quality care regardless of age, patient group, or disease. The role of district nurse varies in terms of definition and scope of practice but has a central role through their health promotion mission and by being the first person these young adults meet in primary care. The aim of this study was to explore district nurses' experiences of meeting young adults with mental illness in primary care. The study was conducted with a qualitative inductive approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with nine district nurses in primary care in Sweden. The data were analysed through qualitative content analysis. Three categories emerged in the results - The difficult meeting, The district nurse's ability to promote health, and A sense of inadequacy. The results show that district nurses can experience feelings of stress and frustration when time, resources, and knowledge are lacking. Continuous training in mental illness was desired by all district nurses. Listening, confirming, and daring to ask were highlighted as particularly important in the meeting with young adults. Cooperation between different professions and colleagues was highlighted as a prerequisite for the provision of good quality care. To meet the increasing number of young adults with mental health problems seeking care, district nurses in primary care need continuous training. By working in a person-centred and health-promoting manner, the district nurse's competence can be utilized. The district nurses perceive they could manage the important role being a resource and take a greater responsibility to guide young adults on the right path.

Trustful conversations: a qualitative interview study on older patients' experiences of the intervention Proactive healthcare in a Swedish primary care setting.

To explore older patients' experiences of the intervention Proactive healthcare for frail elderly persons. Previous research has indicated that continuity and good access to primary care can improve satisfaction in older people seeking care. However, little is known about the older patients' experiences in taking part of interventions aiming to enhance the care. Individual interviews were conducted with 24 older patients who participated in the intervention Proactive healthcare for frail elderly persons, selected from nine Swedish primary care centres. Interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Older patients' experiences of the intervention involved five manifest categories: Ways of naming the elder care team, covering the older patients' lack of understanding regarding their connection to the team, and the need for clarity on this and on how the specialised care provided differed from conventional care; Availability, indicating how older patients associated easy access and a direct telephone number with a team nurse available at certain times with a sense of security; The importance of relations, covering how patients appreciated continuity in their personal and professional conversations with staff; A feeling of safety and trust, stressing the value of older persons attach to being given enough time, to be listened to and being recognised as people; and Finiteness of life, which refers to the difficulty of having end-of-life conversations and the need for experienced staff with personal knowledge of the patients. The latent theme Trustful conversations was created to give a deeper meaning to the content of the categories.Trustful conversations, created through good personal knowledge of patients and continuity of contact, engender a feeling of safety in older patients. Using elder care teams could result in a better quality of care, with increased satisfaction and feelings of security among patients, and a reduction in healthcare needs.

Introducing the C-reactive protein point-of-care test: A conversation analytic study of primary care consultations for respiratory tract infection

The C-reactive protein point-of-care test (CRP-POCT) can help distinguish between viral and bacterial infection and has been promoted as a strategy to improve antimicrobial stewardship. The test is widely used in Sweden. National guidelines advocate conservative use in primary care consultations with patients presenting with symptoms of respiratory tract infection (RTI). Previous research suggests low adherence to guidelines. We provide new insights into the communication surrounding the CRP-POCT by documenting how the decision to administer the test is interactionally motivated and organized in Swedish primary care. The data consists of video-recordings of RTI-consultations. A CRP-POCT was performed in nearly two thirds of the consultations and our study is focused on a subset where the test is ordered by a medical doctor. We find that doctors order the test during the transition from or after physical examination, a practice that aligns with national guidelines. Guidelines indicate that pathological findings from physical examination are warrants for ordering the test but we only found one example where this was communicated to the patient. A more prevalent pattern was that doctors ordered the CRP-POCT even though the outcome of the physical examination was assessed as normal. Our analyses of these show that doctors can provide the rationale for ordering the test in subtle ways and that failure to provide a rationale is treated as a noticeable absence. We also find that the CRP-POCT can be used to reconcile the contrast between the normal physical examination and the patient's problem presentation. Doctors can also order the test in ways that position the CRP-POCT as criterial for antibiotic prescription. Consultations where the patients described the symptoms as particularly severe and/or persistent were more likely to engender elaborate accounts than consultations where patients presented their symptoms as less problematic.

Exploring ethical issues arising from a problem-solving intervention in the Swedish Primary Care

Abstract Background Common mental disorders count for a large percentage of sick leave cases in Europe and in Sweden. Problem-solving with workplace involvement have shown promising results in reducing the number of sick leave days for employees on sick leave for these conditions. Engaging the workplace by for example including the first-line manager in the return-to-work process changes the usual role of the primary care. Hence, this study aims to explore ethical issues that potentially arise when introducing workplace involvement as part of a problem-solving intervention. Methods A qualitative study in the Swedish Primary Care using data from semi-structured interviews with rehabilitation coordinators (n = 6), employees on sick leave for common mental disorders (n = 13), and their first-line managers (n = 8). A theoretical framework for systematic identification of ethical aspects of healthcare technologies was used to guide the interviews and reporting of results. Content analysis was used to code the data, searching for latent content. Ethical issues related to the ethical values privacy, identity, autonomy, professional values, third party, equality and justice were identified and described. The analysis was concluded by a normative discussion. Results Ethical issues were identified such as difficulties for the employees to control personal information. A need to create an integrated role of a patient and an employee and for coordinators to act neutral instead of as a patient advocate. Managers needed to balance the needs of the organization with the needs of the employee. A pre-requisite for participation was agreeing to manager involvement which may affect the equality of the intervention. Conclusions A conversation about sharing of information, roles, responsibilities and expectations during the rehabilitation should be initiated early and be continuous. Managers need support in learning the “how to” when having an employee on sick leave due to a common mental disorder. Key messages

Long-term risk factor control after acute coronary syndrome; results from the Swedish primary care cardiovascular database

Abstract Background Most secondary prevention studies after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have relatively short follow-up time, and less is known about long-term risk factor control in patients after ACS. Purpose We aimed to study and describe the long-term risk factor control, treatment adherence and outcome after ACS. Methods We identified 3765 patients (mean age 75 years, 40% women) with an incident ACS between 2006 and 2010 in the Swedish Primary Care Cardiovascular Database. All participants were followed from index ACS until 31 December 2014 or death. We annually recorded blood pressure, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), dispensed prescription of drugs, recurrent ACS, and death. Data were collected from electronic medical records at the primary care centres, the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, the Swedish Patient Register, and the Cause of Death Register. We calculated annually proportion of days covered (PDC) for secondary prevention medication. PDC value of ≥80% was considered cut off for medication adherence. Results The median follow-up time was 4.8 years (min 1.8 and max 8.0). 1890 new ACS-events were recorded during the follow up; the annual incidence of recurrent ACS was 17.3%, 12.9%, 8.9%, 8.0%, 7.6%, 6.5%, 5.2%, and 5.0% (for year 1 to year 8 respectively). 1859 (49.4%) patients died during the follow up. The annual incidence of death was 19.9%, 7.9%, 7.1%, 8.3%, 7.9%, 8.2%, 6.7%, and 6.4% (for year 1 to year 8 respectively). The annual proportion of patients that achieved the blood pressure target &amp;lt;140/90 mm Hg was 57.8%, 60.9%, 62.7%, 63.3%, 64.9%, 63.1%, 62.4%, and 66.1% (for year 1 to year 8 respectively). The annual mean number of antihypertensive medications for each patient was 1.5, 1.3, 1.3, 1.3, 1.4, 1.4, 1.4, and 1.5 (for year 1 to year 8 respectively). The annual proportion of patients that achieved LDL-C &amp;lt;1.8 mmol/L was 23.1%, 21.7%, 19.8%, 18.2%, 15.7%, 19.6%, 18.3%, and 16.7% (for year 1 to year 8 respectively). The annual proportion of patients in treatment with statins was 55.3%, 57.5%, 58.7%, 59.2%, 63.0%, 63.7%, 64.1%, and 67.7% (for year 1 to year 8 respectively). The annual proportion of patients in treatment with acetylsalicylic acid was 79.6%, 76.4%, 76.2%, 78.9%, 78.3%, 79.2%, and 80.8% % (for year 1 to year 8 respectively). The annual proportion of patients in treatment with P2Y12-inhibitors was 24.3%, 7.2%, 5.4%, 6.0%, 7.2%, 8.1%, 7.9% and 8.2% (for year 1 to year 8 respectively). Conclusion This retrospective long-term real-world study from primary care demonstrates a large potential for improvement of risk factor control in patients after ACS. More specific, this study demonstrates underutilized treatment with antihypertensive medication and statins, while adherence to antiplatelet therapy was found to be high. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Astra Zeneca

Use of faecal immunochemical tests common in patients with suspected colorectal cancer but unrelated to travel distance to secondary care: a population-based study from Swedish primary care

Background Evidence is increasing for the use of faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for occult blood as diagnostic tools when colorectal cancer can be suspected. FITs have been used for this purpose in Swedish primary care since around 2005 despite absence of supporting guidelines. To our knowledge, the extent of this use has not been studied. Objective To investigate the use of FITs as diagnostic tools, and if the use was related to patient age, sex and travel time from primary care to diagnostic facilities in secondary care. Design Population-based retrospective study using data from electronic health records. Setting and subjects Patients ≥18 years that provided FITs in primary care in five Swedish health care regions during 2015. Driving times from their primary care centres to secondary care were calculated. Main outcome measures The proportion of patients that provided FITs was calculated for each region, different age intervals and grouped driving times. Results 18,913 patients provided FITs. The proportion of listed patients in the five regions that provided FITs increased with age: 0.86–1.2% for ages <65 years, 3.6–4.1% for ages 65–79 years and 3.8–6.1% for ages ≥80 years. Differences between the regions were small. There was no overall correlation between the proportion of patients that provided FITs and driving time to secondary care. Conclusion FITs were used extensively in Swedish primary care with a higher use in older age groups. There was no tendency towards a higher use of FITs at primary care centres with longer driving times to secondary care. Key Points Evidence is increasing for the use of faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) as diagnostic tools when colorectal cancer can be suspected. We investigated the use of FITs in Sweden. FITs were used extensively in primary care especially in older age groups. There were small differences in the use of FITs between five studied health care regions. There was no tendency towards a higher use of FITs at primary care centres with longer driving times to diagnostic facilities in secondary care.

Prediabetes and incident heart failure in hypertensive patients: Results from the Swedish Primary Care Cardiovascular Database

Backgrounds and aimsThe cardiovascular risk conferred by concomitant prediabetes in hypertension is unclear. We aimed to examine the impact of prediabetes on incident heart failure (HF) and all-cause mortality, and to describe time in therapeutic blood pressure range (TTR) in a hypertensive real-world primary care population. Methods and resultsIn this retrospective cohort study, 9628 hypertensive individuals with a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in 2006–2010 but no diabetes, cardiovascular or renal disease were followed to 2016; median follow-up was 9 years. Prediabetes was defined as FPG 5.6–6.9 mmol/L, and in a secondary analysis as 6.1–6.9 mmol/L. Study outcomes were HF and all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios (HR) were compared for prediabetes with normoglycemia using Cox regression. All blood pressure values from 2001 to the index date (first FPG in 2006–2010) were used to calculate TTR. At baseline, 51.4% had prediabetes. The multivariable-adjusted HR (95% confidence intervals) was 0.86 (0.67–1.09) for HF and 1.06 (0.90–1.26) for all-cause mortality. For FPG defined as 6.1–6.9 mmol/L, the multivariable-adjusted HR were 1.05 (0.80–1.39) and 1.42 (1.19–1.70), respectively. The prediabetic group had a lower TTR (p < 0.05). ConclusionsPrediabetes was not independently associated with incident HF in hypertensive patients without diabetes, cardiovascular or renal disease. However, prediabetes was associated with all-cause mortality when defined as FPG 6.1–6.9 mmol/L (but not as 5.6–6.9 mmol/L). TTR was lower in the prediabetic group, suggesting room for improved blood pressure to reduce incident heart failure in prediabetes.

Better self-care through co-care? A latent profile analysis of primary care patients' experiences of e-health-supported chronic care management.

BackgroundEfficient self-care of chronic conditions requires that an individual's resources be optimally combined with healthcare's resources, sometimes supported by e-health services (i.e., co-care). This calls for a system perspective of self-care to determine to what extent it involves demanding or unnecessary tasks and whether role clarity, needs support, and goal orientation are sufficient. This study aims to explore typical configurations of how the co-care system is experienced by individuals with chronic conditions who used an e-health service supporting self-monitoring and digital communication with primary care.MethodWe performed a latent profile analysis using questionnaire data from two waves (7 months apart) involving 180 of 308 eligible patients who pilot-tested an e-health service for co-care at a Swedish primary care center. The five subscales of the Distribution of Co-Care Activities (DoCCA) scale were used to create profiles at Time 1 (T1) and Time 2 (T2). Profiles were described based on sociodemographic variables (age, gender, education level, and health condition) and compared based on exogenous variables (self-rated health, satisfaction with healthcare, self-efficacy in self-care, and perceptions of the e-health service).ResultsWe identified four typical configurations of co-care experiences at T1: strained, neutral, supportive, and optimal. Patients with optimal and supportive profiles had higher self-rated health, self-efficacy in self-care, and satisfaction with healthcare than patients with strained and neutral profiles. Slightly more than half transitioned to a similar or more positive profile at T2, for which we identified five profiles: unsupportive, strained, neutral, supportive, and optimal. Patients with optimal and supportive profiles at T2 had higher self-efficacy in self-care and satisfaction with healthcare than the other profiles. The optimal profiles also had higher self-rated health than all other profiles. Members of the optimal and supportive profiles perceived the effectiveness of the e-health service as more positive than the unsupportive and strained profile members.DiscussionPrimary care patients' co-care profiles were primarily distinguished by their experiences of needs support, goal orientation, and role clarity. Patients with more positive co-care experiences also reported higher self-rated health, self-efficacy in self-care, and satisfaction with healthcare, as well as more positive experiences of the e-health service.

A Feeling of Ambiguity: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Managers' Experiences of Evidence-Based Practice in Swedish Primary Care.

BackgroundThe Primary care manager plays a vital role in promoting a research culture in the healthcare center. The position involves both the implementation of organizational directives and patient care. The research culture and use of evidence influence each individual healthcare professional and ultimately the quality of patient care.PurposeTo describe primary healthcare managers’ understanding of evidence-based practice in the Swedish primary healthcare context and their ability to influence its implementation.MethodologyQualitative content analysis of data collected in individual interviews.ResultsIn general, managers expressed a positive view toward the use of evidence in daily practice. However, they were sometimes hesitant about fully implementing evidence-based results. This was mostly attributed to the struggle of balancing finances and allocating sufficient time for staff to keep up with and engage in evidence-based practice.ConclusionThe organizational culture impacts the mind-set of all co-workers including managers. Those managers influenced by traditions and norms may fall into the trap of devaluing the benefit of research and evidence. The inherent feeling of being alone and without guidance in some matters related to evidence-based practice inevitably leads to inconsistency and ambiguity. The use of clinical pathways that constitute one form of evidence has become a substitute for proper, careful, individual investigation, implementation, and evaluation of each patient case. This means that managers experience moral and physical stress when trying to meet organizational, staff, and patient demands.Practice ImplicationAwareness of managers’ influence and experience of working according to evidence-based practice is valuable to gain an insight into how Swedish primary healthcare functions at local level. Illuminating and discussing evidence-based practice is an assurance of quality that contributes to many aspects of the overall safety of care.