In the experience of both painters and physicians in Sweden, French turpentine has a conspicuously lesser tendency to cause dermatitis, than has Swedish turpentine. Prompted by these observations Hellerstrom (1) was able to show that the greater sensitizing power of Swedish turpentine was directly or indirectly due to the A3-carene content. French turpentine does not contain any A3-carene. Investigations by Danbolt and Burckhardt (2), Burckhardt and Schaaf (3), and by Hellerstrom (1) confirmed that stored turpentine causes more severe dermatitis than does freshly distilled turpentine. Storing in air is conducive to the formation of oxidation products; such products occur both in Swedish turpentine and French balsam turpentine that have been stored in air, and the A3-carene in Swedish turpentine is rather more rapidly oxidized than a-pinene, which is the chief constituent of French turpentine. Hellerstrom and Lunden (4) assumed that these circumstances had some significance in the causation of eczema. They subsequently (4) found that the eczematogenic component in turpentine apparently is not attached to the pure hydrocarbons, terpenes CioHie, but to products formed by their oxidiation. In a later paper (Hellerstrom, Thyresson, Blohm, Widmark (5)) a technic was presented that made possible concentration of the eczematogenically active component. This technic was based on the principle of displacement adsorption-a variant of column chro-matography-and a characteristic breaking down of the test substance into an active and an inactive part was possible in a series of different constituents of turpentine (carene, sylvestrene, a-pinene, limonene). In so doing, the eczematogenically active component was invariably concentrated at the end of the sample that traversed, by displacement with ethyl alcohol, a column filled with silica gel. For a detailed description of the experimental technic, vide Blohm (6). All experiments were performed on a microscale with samples amounting to a drop or so.