<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> There has been growing interest in functional outcomes following surgical treatments for degenerative spinal pathologies (DSP). Objective functional measures provide unbiased metrics for assessing both patient's individual baseline functional deficits and postoperative recovery. Balance is a key component to assessment of spine treatment outcomes and has been objectively shown to improve postoperatively among many common DSP. There has, however, been a fundamental lack of understanding of exactly how DSP affects standing postural control and whether it is also impacted by surgical treatments. A novel technique was recently developed using a single force plate which provides direct assessment of balance control and quantifies balance strategy reliance but has yet to be applied to DSP. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To provide preliminary data on balance strategy reliance among DSP using a novel force plate analysis and to compare to health (H) controls. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective review at a single institution. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> DSP patients 122 adult spinal deformity (ASD, 85F/36M, 61yr, 1.6m, 77kg), 81 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS, 51F/31M, 60yr, 1.7m, 81kg), 140 lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS, 40F/100M, 54yr, 1.7m, 92kg), 106 cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM, 58F/48M, 62yr, 1.7m, 82kg), and 61 H (37F/24M, 40yr, 1.7m, 72kg). <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> PROMs VAS pain, ODI/NDI; balance strategy reliance data. <h3>METHODS</h3> Subjects completed 60-second quiescent standing tests with eyes open and arms at their sides while on a force plate. Center of pressure (COP) range of sway (ROS) was used to assess baseline balance deficits. Balance strategy reliance was assessed using force intersection point (FIP) analysis which quantifies degree of balance activation by sway frequency ∼1.75Hz relates to knee and hip involvement at smaller amplitudes. FIP amplitude is reported as % height of the center of mass. <h3>RESULTS</h3> PROMs indicated DSP patients had severe VAS pain (Neck (CSM) 4.8, Back >6.0, Leg >4.0) and disability (ODI/NDI >40). DSP patients all exhibited significantly elevated ROS (mean coronal=31mm, mean sagittal=45mm) compared to H (18mm and 32mm respectively). ASD had significantly lower FIP at 3.5Hz (23%, p=0.003) and 4.0Hz (17%, p=0.029) compared to H (32% and 24%). DLS had significantly lower FIP at 3.0Hz (33%, p=0.036) than H (38%). LSS had significantly lower FIP in 3.5Hz (25%, 0.018), 4.0Hz (18%, p=0.030), and 4.5Hz (14%, p=0.005) than H (32%, 24%, 22% respectively). CSM had significantly lower FIP at 2.5Hz (49%, p=0.027), 3.0Hz (33%, p=0.011), and 4.5Hz (14%, p=0.003) than H (53%, 38%, and 22% respectively). Averages in low frequency FIPs tended to be greater than H and averages in high frequency FIPs tended to be less than H. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> FIP provides novel insight into balance deficits among DSP patients which no method has previously quantified and negates issues associated with voluntary shifts in sway by providing simulatenous data across a range of relevant frequencies. Symptomatic DSP patients exhibited differences in balance strategy reliance compared to H with a general increase in low frequency, ankle-based reliance and a decrease in higher frequency, knee- and hip-based reliance. FIP analysis data is simple to implement clinically with a single force plate and may serve as a future screening tool for DSP screenings. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Read full abstract