Superior Vena Cava Isolation Research Articles

Abstract 4137350: Temporal Trends and Effect of Superior Vena Cava Isolation Plus Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of Superior Vena Cava Isolation (SVCI) plus Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) compared to PVI alone in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods: We utilized PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) and Web of Science to identify the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients undergoing SVCI+PVI ablation compared to PVI alone therapy. The search, conducted until February 17, 2024, used the terms "Superior Vena Cava," "Pulmonary Vein," "Radiofrequency Ablation," and "Atrial Fibrillation." Two reviewers screened records, extracted outcomes, and evaluated risk bias. The analysis employed Revman 5.4 and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta). Results: The results included 4 RCTs involving 532 patients. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation significantly reduced in the SVCI+PVI group compared to the PVI alone group (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26–0.69, P = 0.0005; I 2 = 16%, P heterogeneity = 0.04) during a mean 12-month follow-up. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) supported these findings. Procedural complications did not show significant differences (RR 1.72, 95% CI 0.52–5.75, P = 0.38; I 2 = 0%, P heterogeneity = 0.56). Conclusion: In conclusion, the meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that SVCI in addition to PVI is superior to PVI alone for PAF, with no increase in procedural complications. TSA demonstrated consistent results with an adequate sample size, indicating no need for further RCTs on this matter.

Prevalance of incessant form of atrial fibrillation by superior vena cava (svc) firing:simplified svc and sinus node mapping(sss map) to avoid sinus node injury

Abstract Background The superior vena cava (SVC) is known as a major source of atrial fibrillation(AF), non-pulmonary vein AF foci (NPVAF). In some cases, an incessant form of AF (iAF) by SVC firing prevents obtaining the sinus node location, and anatomical SVC isolation has a risk of sinus node injury (SNI). Objective This study was aimed to explore the frequency of iAF by SVC firing and the efficacy of the simplified mapping strategy to avoid SNI. Methods Consecutive AF ablation procedures in the 3 centers were retrospectively investigated including the NPVAF prevalence. Simplified SVC/SN mapping (SSS-map: Obtaining the top-end of the SVC potential and >4points with 5-10mm spacing in the upper lateral side of the right atria (RA) for roughly locating the earliest activation site in sinus rhythm) was performed before PV isolation in the last 138 patients. In case of the initial rhythm at the procedure was atrial fibrillation, cardioversion was performed for obtaining the SSS-map. In the cases in which the high-density mapping catheters were available, the high-density activation maps of the RA in sinus rhythm were obtained to investigate the dislocation of the earliest activation site of the SSS map from the SN location. When SVC isolation was required due to iAF, SVC isolation line was designed based on the location of the top-end of the SVC potential during AF and ablative linear lesions were created to keep the distance of 5-10 mm above the second earliest activation site. Results A total of 1160 procedures in 1089 patients (male: 736[63.4%], age: 69.9, paroxysmal AF: 544[49.9%], first session: 997[85.9%]) was investigated. Prevalence of NPVAF was revealed in 160 of the all procedures (13.7%) (the SVC: 64, the posterior wall of the left atria: 24, the coronary sinus: 19, and others: 53). 16 of 160 NPVAFs (10.0%) developed to iAF by SVC firing. The SSS-map was successfully obtained in all of the last 138 patients (Initial rhythm at the procedure: AF 43.7%, Mapping time: 1.3±0.6 min, number of obtained points: 8.4±1.3). In 21 patients in which the high-density RA map was obtained, the SN dislocation distance was 5.1±2.2mm between the SSS map and the high-density RA map. Five of 138 developed to iAF by SVC firing, and SVC isolation based on the SSS-map was successfully achieved without SNI in the cases. Conclusion This study indicated iAF driven by SVC firing after PV isolation occurred in certain number of patients. The SSS-map before PV isolation was practical and showed the potential to be the mapping strategy avoid the SN injury in such cases.

Anatomical characteristics of the phrenic nerve and the spontaneous conduction block between the right atrium and the superior vena cava

Abstract Introduction Although the superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) with minimal radiofrequency application using a spontaneous right atrium – superior vena cava (RA-SVC) conduction block has been reported, the anatomical characteristics of the spontaneous RA-SVC conduction block is not clear. Purpose The aim of this study to evaluate the anatomical relationship between the spontaneous RA-SVC conduction block and the phrenic nerve (PN). Methods This study consisted of 73 patients who attempted to undergo SVCI using a RA-SVC conduction block. The RA-SVC conduction block was visualized using the extended early meets late tool with the CARTO3 system. We set the first lower threshold at 1800/total local activation time to optimize the visualization of spontaneous RA-SVC conduction block. If the SVC was not isolated by ablation to the gap of the visualized conduction block line, the lower threshold was increased by 5%, and the new gap was ablated each time. The course of the right PN was detected by pacing with 20 mA /2 ms. The RA-SVC conduction block and the course of the PN were measured with reference to the height of the left atrial roof. The extend of the RA-SVC conduction block and PN were measured in angles with respect to the ventral side (Figure 1). These anatomical parameters were compared between the RA-SVC block line and the PN. Results Sixty-one patients (83.6%) had spontaneous RA-SVC conduction block, and the remaining 12 patients (16.4%) did not. Anatomical characteristics were evaluated in 61 patients with spontaneous RA-SVC conduction block. Compared with the course of the PN, RA-SVC conduction block extended more posteriorly (110 degrees vs 128 degrees, P = 0.013) and more caudally (9.5 mm vs 16.1 mm, P<0.0001) (Figure 2). In the patients who underwent SVCI using a RA-SVC conduction block, any patients did not undergo radiofrequency application on the course of the PN. Conclusion Since the caudal end of the RA-SVC conduction block is posterior to the caudal end of the phrenic nerve, SVCI using the RA-SVC conduction block may be able to avoid ablation near the PN.Figure1Figure2

Voltage-Guided and Non-Voltage-Guided Superior Vena Cava Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

In addition to the pulmonary vein, the superior vena cava (SVC) is an important focus of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, SVC isolation may cause serious complications, and appropriate settings and techniques for SVC isolation are lacking. This study enrolled 86 consecutive patients with AF who underwent SVC isolation. Voltage mapping using a multi-electrode catheter and ablation were performed under the guidance of an electro-anatomical mapping system. The lines encircling the SVC were divided into eight anatomic segments on the SVC geometry, and each segment was subjected to voltage-guided (VG) ablation in decreasing order of voltage (starting from the segment with the highest voltage). Non-VG (NVG) ablation was performed anatomically from the anterior wall toward the septum with one-round cautery. A total of 86 cases (66 males, mean age 69 [60, 74], mean CHA2DS2 VASc score 2 [1, 3], 58 paroxysmal AF) with AF were included for ablation. Electrical SVC isolation was successfully achieved in all patients. The length of the myocardial sleeves, as measured from the SVC-RA junction to the end of the local signal, was 37 [28, 45]mm. Major axis of the RA-SVC junction was 15 [13, 17] and minor axis of the RA-SVC junction was 11 [9, 13]. The number of ablation points with VG SVC isolation was fewer than that for NVG SVC isolation (8 [5, 11.5] vs. 11.5 [8.8, 13.3]; p=0.001). The procedure time of VG SVC isolation was greater than that of NVG SVC isolation (259s [154, 379] vs. 167s [115, 222]; p=0.012). There were no significant differences in the complication rates. VG SVC isolation reduced the number of ablation points compared with NVG SVC isolation.

Empirical superior vena cava electrical isolation guided by quantitative ablation index improves outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BackgroundThe value of empirical superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to improve the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) remains controversial.ObjectiveTo...

Combined approach of high-power and very high-power, short-duration ablation in superior vena cava isolation.

The effectiveness and safety of 50 W, high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation in superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been reported. However, the acute outcomes of SVCI combined with 90 W/4 s, very high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) ablation remain unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate a novel approach that combines 50 W-HPSD and 90 W/4 s-vHPSD ablation in SVCI and to elucidate the characteristics, outcomes, and safety of this approach by comparing SVCI with conventional ablation index (AI)-guided middle-power, middle-duration (MPMD) ablation. Overall, 126 patients who underwent AF ablation with SVCI using the QDOT MICROTM catheter were retrospectively reviewed; one group underwent SVCI with a combined approach of HPSD and vHPSD ablation (50 W/90 W group, n = 73) and another group underwent AI-guided MPMD ablation (30-40 W group, n = 53). This study compared the procedural details, radiofrequency (RF) ablation profiles, and complications. The RF settings used in the 50 W/90 W group were 50 W/7 s for the lateral segment close to the phrenic nerve and 90 W/4 s for the nonlateral segment. The 50 W/90 W group required a significantly shorter procedural time (3.2 vs. 5.9 min, p < .001), shorter RF duration (42.0 vs. 162.0 s, p < .001), and lower RF energy (2834 vs. 5480 J, p < .001) than the 30-40 W group. Procedural success, first-pass SVCI, number of RF applications, and SVC reconnection after isoproterenol loading were comparable between the groups. The maximum tip-electrode temperature of the multi-thermocouple system was significantly higher in the 50 W/90 W group than in the 30-40 W group (50.0°C vs. 47.0°C, p < .001). No complications, such as phrenic nerve injury or bleeding requiring transfusion, were observed in either group. The combined approach of 50 W/7 s-HPSD and 90 W/4 s-vHPSD ablation resulted in successful and safe SVCI with shorter procedural time, shorter RF duration, and lower RF energy.

Usefulness of empiric superior vena cava isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

The long-term success rate of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is suboptimal due to the presence of non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci that can trigger atrial fibrillation (AF) in up to 11%. Among non-PV triggers, the superior vena cava (SVC) is a major site of origin of ectopic beats initiating AF. To compare data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing PVI + empiric SVC isolation (SVCI) versus PVI alone in terms of AF recurrence, procedure-related complications, and fluoroscopic and procedural times. A search of online scientific libraries (from inception to April 1, 2024) was performed. Four RCTs were considered eligible for the meta-analysis totaling 600 patients of whom 287 receiving PVI + SVCI and 313 receiving PVI alone. In the overall population, SVCI + PVI was associated with a non-significant reduction of AF recurrence at follow-up (0.66 [0.43;1.00], p = 0.05, I2 0%). In patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF), a significant reduction of AF recurrence was related to SVCI + PVI (11.7%) as compared to PVI alone (19.9%) (0.54 [0.32;0.92], p = 0.02, I2 0%). No statistical differences were found among the groups in terms of fluoroscopic (3.31 [- 0.8;7.41], p = 0.11, I2 = 91%), procedural times (5.69 [- 9.78;21.16], p = 0.47, I2 = 81%), and complications (1.06 [0.33;3.44], p = 0.92, I2 = 0%). The addition of SVCI to PVI in patients in PAF is associated with a significant lower rate of AF recurrence at follow-up, without increasing complication rates and procedural and fluoroscopy times.

Superior vena cava isolation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter: feasibility and safety in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

Superior vena cava (SVC) isolation during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation is limited by the risk of collateral damage to the sinus node and/or the phrenic nerve. Due to its tissue-specificity, we hypothesized the feasibility and safety of pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-based SVC isolation. One hundred and five consecutive patients undergoing PFA-based AF catheter ablation were prospectively included. After pulmonary vein isolation (±posterior wall isolation and electrical cardioversion), SVC isolation was performed using a standardized workflow. Acute SVC isolation was achieved in 105/105 (100%) patients after 6 ± 1 applications. Transient phrenic nerve stunning occurred in 67/105 (64%) patients but without phrenic nerve palsy at the end of the procedure and at hospital discharge. Transient high-degree sinus node dysfunction occurred in 5/105 (4.7%) patients, with no recurrence at the end of the procedure and until discharge. At the 3-month follow-up visit, no complication occurred. SVC isolation using a pentaspline PFA catheter is feasible and safe.

Safety and efficacy of very high-power short ablation in superior vena cava isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract Backgrounds The superior vena cava (SVC) plays an important role in non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci to trigger atrial fibrillation (AF) and thus are occasionally isolated. A major complication in SVC isolation is phrenic nerve injury, and a shallower ablation depth might be less likely to cause complications. Recently, very high power short ablation (vHPSD) has been demonstrated to be effective in PV isolation. On the other hand, vHPSD has been reported to have shallower depth than the low-power ablation strategies, suggesting concerns about insufficient ablation in thicker myocardial sites. The vHPSD might be effective and safe in SVC isolation thinner than myocardium, however, the details were not elucidated. Purpose This study was aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of vHPSD strategy in SVC isolation, compared retrospectively with low power ablation strategies. Methods Patients with AF who were undergoing first-time SVC isolation were included. An activation map was performed from the SVC to the right atrium during sinus rhythm, and a circumferential isolation line was designed by the CARTO system at a height of 1.5cm above the earliest site. The site and extent of capture of the phrenic nerve by pacing on the circumferentially designed ablation line were recorded. The first step was to perform circumferential ablation except for the sites where the phrenic nerve was captured. If the SVC isolation was completed, the procedure was completed. If the isolation was inadequate, the sites of capture of the phrenic nerve were also ablated. Two groups of patients were analyzed: those performing vHPSD (n=27, vHPSD group) with a power of 90 watts for 3 seconds or those using lower-power (n=20, LP group) limited to 20-40 watts. Results Forty-seven patients who underwent the initial SVC isolation were evaluated. We analyzed all 351 points in the vHPSD group and all 364 points in the LP group with ablation of SVC. No differences were found in the distance of the SVC circumference on the isolation line (vHPSD: 71±10 vs. LPLD: 71±11mm, p=0.95) or the extent of phrenic nerve capture (12±7 vs. 12±9mm, p=0.82). All patients in the vHPSD group were successfully isolated first-pass; the first-pass isolation rate tended to be higher than in the LP group (100% vs. 85%, p=0.07). Differences were observed in temperature rise (49±4 vs. 28±4 degrees, p&amp;lt;0.001) and impedance drop (12±4 vs. 7±5Ω, p&amp;lt;0.001), although there were no differences in the contact force (15±8 vs. 15±7g, p= 0.73). The vHPSD group achieved SVC isolation with a shorter procedure time (9±4 vs. 17±5 min, p&amp;lt;0.001) and fewer ablation points (13±4 vs. 18±4, p&amp;lt;0.001) compared to the LP group. In the vHPSD cases, ATP was administered after isolation, but no dormant conduction was observed. Only in one case in the LP group, transient phrenic nerve injury was observed. Conclusion The vHPSD for SVC isolation might be safe and result in shorter procedure time and fewer ablation points.

Pulsed field ablation-based superior vena cava isolation in the presence of defibrillator leads

Abstract Introduction Only a minority of operators in the MANIFEST-PF multinational survey performed superior vena cava isolation by means of pulsed field ablation (PFA). This is the first report of off-label PFA-mediated superior vena cava isolation in the presence of defibrillator leads. Purpose Aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of PFA applications in the superior vena cava in the terms of alterations in pacing, sensing, or impedance parameters, inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing, ICD shock and leads dislodgment. Methods Five patients with a history of dilated cardiomyopathy, dual chamber defibrillator implantation, and worsening heart failure because of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent catheter ablation of AF. Three of the patients had dual coil defibrillator leads. PFA was selected for the index procedure in these decompensated heart failure patients with enlarged atria focusing beyond pulmonary vein isolation in posterior wall and roof ablation as well as in superior vena cava isolation. Results Basket configuration and two sets of two lesions at the trunk of the vessel (with rotation between each pair) were used for superior vena cava isolation in the presence of atrial and defibrillator leads, without any impact on device and leads measurements or sinus node function. All patients were in AF and cardioverted into sinus rhythm post- superior vena cava isolation. They remained at sinus rhythm at regular 3-month follow-up while device interrogation revealed intact sinus node function. Conclusion PFA applications in the superior vena cava of AF patients with implanted defibrillators confirmed that it is a safe and feasible method regardless of energy application adjacent to the leads.

Superior vena cava isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - mind the phrenic

Abstract Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the standard of care for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but medium-term success rates are far from ideal. Therefore, new methods are being developed, with emphasis on ectopic foci outside the pulmonary veins. Superior vena cava (SVC) is one of the most important non-pulmonary origins of AF and some studies suggested that empiric SVC isolation could improve outcomes in ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Although complications have been reported in SVC ablation, most studies found complication rates of SVC ablation similar to conventional cryoballoon PVI. Aim This prospective, single-center study aimed to assess the complication rate and success rate of PVI followed by SVC isolation by cryoballoon application in comparison with conventional cryoballoon PVI. Methods We designed an unblinded, randomized clinical trial and recruited consecutive patients with PAF who were randomized to a conventional cryoballoon PVI or PVI and additional SVC cryoballoon isolation using single 180 s freeze. Results A total of 140 patients (61.4% male, mean age 62.1 years) with PAF were included and 67 (47.9%) were randomized to SVC isolation in addition to conventional ablation. Planned 180-s freeze in the SVC could be completed in 15 (22.4%) patients, while 27 (40.3%) patients received at least 120-s freeze. The mean time to SVC isolation was 40.2 ± 37.9 s. Real-time recording of SVC isolation was observed in 39 (58.2%) patients. Right phrenic nerve palsy (PNP), impending or transient, occurred in 6 (8.2%) patients in the PVI-only group and in 25 (37.3%) patients in the SVC-group (Chi-square test p &amp;lt; 0.001). There were no persistent PNP cases. Bradycardia or junctional rhythm was observed during a procedure in 15 (22.4%) patients who received SVC isolation. One patient eventually received a permanent AAI pacemaker due to a sinus node injury. Conclusion Our data suggest that SVC isolation can be successfully achieved in the majority of PAF patients using conventional cryoballoon. However, this significantly increases the rate of transient or impending PNP and sinus node injury in comparison to conventional cryoballoon PVI. Therefore, careful phrenic nerve function monitoring and attention to sinus bradycardia or junctional rhythm are important to mitigate this risk. Follow-up data are being collected to determine whether this risk could be outweighed by a lower rate of PAF recurrence.

Association of superior vena cava isolation with improved outcomes in atrial fibrillation ablation

Abstract Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the mainstay in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, additional arrhythmogenic foci seem to contribute to AF initiation and maintenance. A great proportion of those non-PV foci have been reported to be located in the superior vena cava. Purpose We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of SVC isolation as an adjunctive therapy to PVI isolation. Methods We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase. Inclusion criteria were cohort studies with control group or randomized clinical trials, comparing patients undergoing PVI only and patients undergoing PVI with concurrent SVC isolation, in effects of freedom from atrial tachycardia, need for cardioversion, hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Results A total of 7 studies, incorporating 1.550 patients, were included. The combination of SVC and PVI isolation in patients undergoing AF ablation was more effective than PVI isolation alone (risk ratio = 0.689; 95% confidence interval, 0.505-0.942). In a subgroup analysis, the isolation of SVC after identifying focal potentials demonstrated effectiveness (risk ratio = 0.573; 95% confidence interval, 0.364-0.902), while the isolation of SVC when the focal potentials were induced after isoprotenerol infusion or rapid atrial pacing did not alter the clinical outcomes (risk ratio = 0.798; 95% confidence interval, 0.493, 1.292). Conclusions The outcomes of AF ablation are favorable when additional SVC isolation is conducted. The effect is pronounced when spontaneous SVC potentials are identified.

Results of external validation for anatomical site recognition of ablation sites in atrial fibrillation using the CARTONET R12 model

Abstract Background CARTONET® is a cloud-based management system designed for retrospective analysis of ablation procedures using the CARTO system. Leveraging a proprietary machine learning model, it automates procedural information analysis. However, the efficacy and accuracy of the CARTONET R12 model's automated location identification remain unverified. Methods This study involved a total of 396 cases. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), including cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation, was performed in 313 patients (PVI group). PVI and additional ablation, such as a Box isolation and superior vena cava isolation (SVCI), was performed in 83 patients (PVI+ group). We compared the automated location identification of R12 model and the location identification of arrhythmia experts. Results In this study, 29,422 points were analyzed. The sensitivity of the pulmonary vein carina was low in both PVI group and PVI+ group. Excluding the inferior, anterior, and ridge segmentations, PVI group demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity compared to PVI + group. Regarding the ablation lines for box isolation, both the roof line and post line showed results below 30%. The pulmonary vein carina showed a low PPV in both PVI group and PVI+ group. In segmentations excluding the anterior, PVI group demonstrated significantly higher PPV compared to the group PVI+. Regarding the ablation lines for box isolation, both the roof line and post line showed results below 50%.The R12 model couldn't auto-identify CTI and SVC. Conclusion Excluding the carina, it can be said that in cases where PVI was performed, both PPV and sensitivity demonstrate high accuracy. Conversely, in cases where Box isolation was performed, accuracy decreases due to the low discrimination ability between ablation information near the roof, posterior wall, and inferior wall of the pulmonary veins and the ablation lines of Box isolation. Regarding the right atrium, it was found that the R12 model is entirely incapable of discriminating SVC and CTI, indicating a need for revisions in the current model.The segmentation of anatomyResults of the positive predict value

Reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improved quality of life in cardiac amyloidosis patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

Abstract Background Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has been associated with an increased risk of atrial arrhythmias and development and worsening of heart failure due to infiltration of the amyloid protein in the atrial wall. Few data exist regarding prognosis, symptoms, and quality of life after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in this category of patients. Objective The study evaluates the outcome of hospitalization for heart failure and quality of life in cardiac amyloidosis patients with atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. Methods This is a study including 102 consecutive patients from two different centers with an established diagnosis of amyloidosis ATTR that underwent their first AF catheter ablation for persistent AF. They underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation + isolation of left atrial posterior wall and superior vena cava. Additionally, extrapulmonary triggers were identified and ablated. Post procedure, patients were followed up routinely with ECG during office visits, 7-day Holter monitor and event recorders during the first year followed by biannual checkups during the remaining part of the follow-up period. Quality of life (QoL) was measured using The Minnesota Living Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) before Catheter ablation and after 18 months follow up; QoL was compared with T-test. Results 102 patients (mean age 72 ± 6) were included in the study. After 18 months follow up, 72 patients (70.6%) remained arrhythmia-free without antiarrhythmic drugs (Group 1), whereas 30 patients (29.4%) experienced recurrence (Group 2). In Group 1, 9 patients were hospitalized for heart failure, in contrast to 18 patients in Group 2, indicating a higher rate of heart failure hospitalizations associated with arrhythmia recurrence (p=0.02). The Quality of life in group 1 was 62 ±12 points before ablation and 63±16 points at 18 months follow up (p=0.17) while in group 2 was 68±16 points before ablation and 86±12 points at 18 months follow up (p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion Catheter ablation for AF in patients with cardiac amyloidosis is associated with reduced hospitalizations for heart failure, along with improvement in QoL.

Efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation on chronic ibrutinib therapy

Abstract Background Ibrutinib represents a cornerstone in the management of B-Cells malignancies and chronic lymphatic leukaemia. This drug however was associated with a 5-fold increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF). The consequences of AF in this category of frailty patients such as heart failure may lead to the need of Ibrutinib withdrawal, which is considered a disease modifying therapy. Purpose This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in managing AF in patients on chronic ibrutinib therapy. Methods this study evaluated 20 consecutive patients from two centres in Italy who developed persistent AF during chronic therapy with Ibrutinib for chronic lymphatic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma and underwent AF catheter ablation from 2016 to 2020. Antiarrhythmic drugs were withdrawn because of side effects and drug interaction. All receive pulmonary vein (PV) isolation + isolation of left atrial posterior wall (PW) and superior vena cava. A standardized protocol was performed to confirm persistent PVI and elicit any triggers originating from non-PV sites. Ablation of non-PV sites triggering runs of atrial tachyarrhythmias was left to operator's discretion. Exclusion criteria were age&amp;lt;18 years and history of AF before ibrutinib therapy. Patients were monitored for arrhythmia at quarterly office visits, ECGs, 7-day Holter monitoring and event recorders during the first year followed by biannual checkups during the remaining part of the follow-up period. Results 12 patients received PV+PW+SVC isolation plus ablation of non-PV trigger (Group 1) whereas 8 receive only PV+PW+SVC isolation (Group 2). 10 (83,3%) patients in group 1 remained arrhythmia-free without the need for additional antiarrhythmic drugs while only 3 (37,5%) in group 2 maintained sinus rhythms. Non pulmonary triggers were mostly found in left atrial appendage (5/12, 41,6%), coronary sinus (4/12, 33,3%) and crista terminalis (3/12 25%). More than one trigger was found in 4 (33.3) patients. After 22.3 ±3.6 months follow-up, patients with ablation of induced non-PV triggers had a significantly higher arrhythmia control than those whose triggers were not ablated (Chi – square p value: 0.035; Log rank p value: 0.014) (Fig.1). 5 patient that received left atrial appendage isolation underwent a left atrial appendage closure with Watchman device 3 months after atrial fibrillation ablation. Conclusion Catheter ablation in this category of patients seems to be a safe and effective tool for managing atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent AF on chronic ibrutinib therapy; an ablation strategy that includes as a first line therapy non pulmonary vein triggers appears to be an effective approach when compared to pulmonary vein plus posterior wall only. This approach will allow continuation of ibrutinib treatment, which markedly enhances the prognosis and diminishes the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in this patient population.Kaplan-Meier curve showing recurrence-fr

Prevalence of non pulmonary vein triggers and pulmonary pressure change in atrial fibrillation ablation for cardiac amyloidosis patients

Abstract Background Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has been associated with an increased risk of atrial arrhythmias and high risk to develop pulmonary hypertension due to infiltration of the amyloid protein in the atrial wall. Though non-PV triggers are commonly seen in left atrium, they are also seen in the right side of the heart, so identifying them at the time of ablation is essential. Objective The study evaluates the prevalence of non-PV triggers during catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients affected by cardiac amyloidosis and how restoration of sinus rhythm affects pulmonary pressures. Methods This is a study including 74 consecutive patients with an established diagnosis of amyloidosis ATTR diagnosed with cardiac MRI or myocardial biopsy that underwent their first AF catheter ablation. All have a transthoracic echocardiogram before ablation. They underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation + isolation of left atrial posterior wall and superior vena cava. Additionally, extrapulmonary triggers, which are defined as ectopic triggers originating from sites other than PVs including left atrial appendage (LAA), coronary sinus (CS), interatrial septum, crista terminalis, mitral valve anulus were identified. Post procedure, patients were followed up routinely with ECG during office visits, echocardiogram, 7-day Holter monitor and event recorders during the first year followed by biannual checkups during the remaining part of the follow-up period. Student’s t-test was used to compare pulmonary pressure between the groups. Results Isoproterenol-challenge revealed non-PV triggers in 51 (68.9%) patients. These triggers were mostly mapped to LAA (39, 52.7%), CS (30, 40,5%), and crista terminalis (35, 47.3%). Besides, ectopic beats were seen originating from inter-atrial septum (19, 25.6%), mitral valve annulus (10, 13.5%). More than one trigger was found in (68%) patients. At 1-year after the ablation, 65 (87.8%) were arrhythmia-free off antiarrhythmic drugs. Moreover, in patients who maintained sinus rhythm post-ablation, there was either a non progression or a reduction in pulmonary pressures (PAPm before ablation: 44.8 ± 8.9 mmHg vs PAPm after ablation 45.1 ± 11.1 mmHg, P value =0.87). Conversely, those experiencing arrhythmic recurrences demonstrated an increase in pulmonary pressures (PAPm before ablation: 41.9 ± 7.7 mmHg vs PAPm after ablation 47.8 ± 10.2 mmHg, P value =0.019). Fig.1 Conclusion Our findings suggest that non-PV triggers are highly prevalent in cardiac amyloidosis AF patients including a high rate crista terminalis firing. Notably, restoration of sinus rhythm post-ablation was linked to stable or reduced pulmonary arterial pressures, whereas patients with arrhythmic recurrences experienced a significant increase.

Successful catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia initiated with orthodromic capture of superior vena cava potentials.

Acase of successful catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia is reported. After pulmonary vein isolation, atrial tachycardia was induced by the use of isoproterenol and burst pacing from the catheter in the right atrium. An attempt was made to create athree-dimensional (3D) map of the atrial tachycardia, but the atrial tachycardia was terminated in the middle of the mapping. The 3D map was insufficient but indicated that the superior vena cava was involved in the circuit. When the intracardiac electrograms were reviewed, it was found that the atrial tachycardia was initiated with orthodromic capture of superior vena cava potentials and it was considered that the atrial tachycardia involved the superior vena cava-right atrium junction. Accordingly, superior vena cava isolation was performed. After that, atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardias were not induced by the use of isoproterenol and burst pacing. In this case, an intracardiac electrogram at the time of induction of the tachycardia was helpful for understanding the circuit of the tachycardia.

Clinical implication of persistent left superior vena cava isolation for atrial fibrillation: Author's reply.

Clinical implication of persistent left superior vena cava isolation for atrial fibrillation: Author's reply.

Cardiac Pulsed Field Ablation Lesion Durability Assessed by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Reflectometry.

Pulsed field ablation uses electrical fields to cause nonthermal cell death over several hours. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry is an optical imaging technique that can detect changes in the tissue ultrastructure in real time, which occurs when muscular tissue is damaged. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of a polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry system to predict the development of chronic lesions based on acute changes in tissue birefringence during pulsed field ablation. Superior vena cava isolation was performed in 30 swine using a biphasic, bipolar pulsed field ablation system delivered with a nonirrigated focal tip catheter. Acute changes in tissue birefringence and voltage abatement were analyzed for each individual lesion. A high-resolution electroanatomical map was performed at baseline and 4 to 12 weeks after ablation to locate electrical gaps in the ablated area. A total of 141 lesions were delivered and included in the analysis. Acute electrical isolation based on the electroanatomical map was achieved in 96% of the animals, but chronic isolation was only seen in 14 animals (46%). The mean voltage abatement of lesions that showed recovery was 82.8%±14.6% versus 84.4%±17.4% for those that showed fibrosis (P=0.7). The mean acute reduction in tissue birefringence in points demonstrating fibrosis was 63.8%±11.3% versus 9.1%±0.1% in the points that resulted in electrical gaps. A threshold of acute reduction of birefringence of ≥20% could predict chronic lesion formation with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 83%. Acute tissue birefringence changes assessed with polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry during pulsed field ablation can predict chronic lesion formation and guide the ablation procedure although limited by the tissue thickness.

Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation ablation: different recovery courses among cryoballoon, laser balloon, and radiofrequency ablation.

Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is one of the common complications in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, which often recovers spontaneously. However, the course of its recovery has not been examined fully, especially in regard to the different ablation methods. We sought to compare the recovery course of PNI in cryoballoon, laser balloon, and radiofrequency ablation. This multicenter retrospective study analyzed 355 patients who suffered from PNI during AF ablation. PNI occurred during cryoballoon ablation (CB group) and laser balloon ablation (LB group) for a pulmonary vein isolation in 288 and 20 patients, and radiofrequency ablation for a superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (RF-SVC group) in 47 patients, respectively RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the estimated probability of PNI recovery after the procedure between the methods (p = 0.01). PNI recovered significantly earlier in the CB group, especially within 24h and 3months post-procedure (the percentage of the recovery within 24h and 3months: 49.7% and 71.5% in the CB group, 15.0% and 22.2% in the LB group, and 23.4% and 41.9% in the RF-SVC group, respectively). Persistent PNI after 12months was observed in only seven patients in the CB group, one in the LB group, and four in the RF-SVC group, respectively. PNI rarely persists over 12months after AF ablation; however, there is a difference in the timing of its recovery. PNI recovers quicker with cryoballoon ablation than with laser balloon ablation or radiofrequency ablation of the SVC.