Suture Endobutton Research Articles

Varying Distance Between Suture-Endobuttons Does Not Improve Stability of the Transected Syndesmosis in a Motion Tracking Cadaveric Model

Category: Ankle; Sports Introduction/Purpose: A growing body of evidence favors the use of dynamic fixation techniques such as suture endo button over rigid screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries. However, specific dynamic fixation techniques have been poorly evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare single suture-endobutton fixation (single) to double fixation with suture-endobuttons placed one centimeter (cm) apart (double 1 cm) and double fixation with suture-endobuttons placed three cm apart (double 3 cm). Methods: Twenty-four lower leg specimens from twelve cadavers were tested using a custom biaxial apparatus. Internal rotation, external rotation, and anterior and posterior translation of the tibia and fibula were examined using motion tracking systems after transection of deltoid and syndesmotic ligaments to compare three syndesmotic repair techniques: 1) a single suture-endobutton placed 1 cm above the joint line, 2) two suture suture-endobuttons placed 2 and 3 cm above the joint line, and 3) two suture- endobuttons placed 1 and 4 cm above the joint line. Results: All three endobutton constructs improved the stability of the syndesmosis by reducing aberrant motion after transection. There was no clear superiority of either single suture-endobutton (SEB), double suture-endobuttons placed 2 and 3 cm above the joint line (DSEB 1), or double suture-endobuttons placed 1 and 4 cm above the joint line (DSEB 3). DSEB 3 and DSEB 1 showed equal median laxity for tibia internal rotation (2.7 degrees, DSEB 1 (2.0 – 3.2) degrees, DSEB 3 (2.3 – 2.8) degrees), tibia external rotation (-0.2 degrees, DSEB 1 (-0.4 - 0.4) degrees, DSEB 3 (-0.4 - 0.3) degrees), and fibula external rotation (-0.3 degrees, DSEB 1 (-0.7 - 0.3) degrees, DSEB 3 (-0.7 - 0.7) degrees). Conclusion: Cadaveric biomechanical studies are critical to evaluate various suture-endobutton constructs prior to widespread use in patients. Our results demonstrate that the added cost of a second suture-endobutton may not confer substantial additional stability to the syndesmosis. Likewise, increased spread between suture-endobuttons appears to have minimal impact of syndesmotic stability.

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION: HOOK PLATE VERSUS SUTURE BUTTON.

We aimed to compare the functional and radiographical outcomes of reconstruction of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using Hook Plate (HP) versus Suture Endobutton (SE) fixation techniques. Forty-six consecutive patients with grade III to V ACJ dislocation according to Rockwood classification who underwent either HP or SE fixation in the period between January 2017 and June 2020 were evaluated. The treatment modalities were divided into either HP or SE fixation. The radiological assessment included standard anterior-posterior (AP) views to evaluate coracoclavicular (CC) distances for vertical reduction. CC distances were grouped as preoperative (CC1), early postoperative (CC2), and late postoperative (CC3). The distance variance between CC2 and CC3 was referred as ΔCC (CC3 - CC2). A statistically significant difference was found in ΔCC between the two groups (p=0.008). ΔCC was significantly higher in the SE group compared to the HP group (p<0.05). The Constant and UCLA Scores of patients in the SE group were found to be significantly higher than in the HP group patients. Clinical outcomes were more satisfactory in patients with acute unstable ACJ dislocation who underwent SE compared to HP procedures, at the end of the first year. Evidence Level IV; Case Series.

Interference Screw Versus Suture Endobutton Fixation of a Fiber-Reinforced Meniscus Replacement Device in a Human Cadaveric Knee Model

Background: Meniscal lesions represent one of the most common intra-articular knee injuries. Meniscus replacement devices are needed to restore load distribution and knee stability after meniscectomy. Fixation of these devices is crucial to the generation of hoop stresses and the distribution of loads in the joint. Purpose: To evaluate 2 different fixation techniques (suture endobutton and interference screw) for implantation of a novel meniscus device. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In 7 human cadaveric knees (aged 17-61 years), 1 anterior and 2 potential posterior tunnel locations were investigated, and both fixation techniques were tested in each tunnel. The native meniscus roots, devices fixed with a suture endobutton, and devices fixed with an interference screw were gripped with cryoclamps, and tibias were drilled and loaded into a custom jig. Samples were preloaded, preconditioned, loaded for 500 cycles (50-150 N), and tested in tension until failure. Results: For all 3 tunnels, suture fixation resulted in greater elongation (54.1%-150.7% greater; P < .05) during cyclic loading than interference screw fixation, which approximated the native roots. Both fixation techniques displayed ultimate tensile loads in the same range as native roots. However, stiffness of the suture fixation groups (36.5-41.6 N/mm) was only 28% to 37% of that of the interference screw fixation groups (98.7-131.6 N/mm), which had values approaching those of the native roots (anterior: 175.4 ± 24.2 N/mm; posterior: 157.6 ± 22.9 N/mm). Conclusion: Interference screw fixation was found to be superior to suture fixation with regard to elongation and stiffness, a finding that should be considered in the design and implantation of novel meniscus replacement devices. Clinical Relevance: With the emergence of various devices for total meniscus replacement, the establishment of fixation strategies is crucial for the generation of tensile hoop stresses and the efficacy of these approaches.

L-F4.2b Open stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with a suture endobutton fixation: functional and radiological evaluation of 21 patients

L-F4.2b Open stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with a suture endobutton fixation: functional and radiological evaluation of 21 patients

Outcomes of Suture Button Repair of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis

Recently, a suture button device has been advocated as a simple and effective method of repairing the syndesmosis. Proponents of the device have cited earlier weightbearing and elimination of the need for device removal as potential advantages over metallic screws. However, the available reports generally have short followup. With longer followup, some concerns about the suture button device have surfaced. We reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of 24 patients with acute injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis who were treated with suture button fixation. Average followup was 20 months. The primary outcomes measure was the AOFAS ankle hindfoot score. Secondary outcomes measures included a calibrated measurement of the tibiofibular clear space and tibiofibular overlap. The average AOFAS score was 94 points. Syndesmotic parameters returned to normal after surgery and remained normal throughout the followup period. One in four patients required removal of the suture endobutton device due to local irritation or lack of motion. Osteolysis of the bone and subsidence of the device into the bone was observed in four patients. Three patients developed heterotopic ossification within the syndesmotic ligament, one mild, one moderate, and one who had a nearly complete syndesmotic fusion. The suture button device is an effective way to repair the syndesmosis. In our series, the reduction of the syndesmosis was maintained throughout the followup period. However, reoperation for device removal was more common than anticipated. Osteolysis of the bone near the implant and subsidence of the device may occur.

Transosseous Fixation of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis: Comparison of an Interosseous Suture and Endobutton to Traditional Screw Fixation in 50 Cases

In this prospective cohort study, we compared screw fixation to interosseous suture with endobutton repair of the syndesmosis. Outcomes of interest included preoperative and postoperative modified American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot and ankle scores, and Short Form-12 health status scores, as well as radiographic measurements and the time to full weight bearing. Mean averages and ranges were calculated for numeric variables, and outcomes for each fixation group were compared statistically with Student t test. The cohort consisted of 50 patients; 25 in the screw fixation group and 25 in the interosseous wire with endobuttons group. The mean patient age was 34.68 (15 to 55) years in the interosseous suture endobutton group and 36.68 (17 to 74) years in the screw group, and the mean follow-up was 10.78 (range 6 to 12) months in the interosseous suture endobutton group, and 8.20 (range 4 to 24) months in the screw group. No statistically significant differences (P < or = .05) were noted in regard to age, follow-up duration, time to postoperative weight bearing, or subjective outcome scores between the fixation groups; although statistically significant improvements were noted in the subjective scores for each fixation group between the preoperative and postoperative measurements. The results of this study indicate that the interosseous suture with endobuttons is a reasonable option for repair of ankle syndesmotic injuries, and may be as effective as traditional internal screw fixation. 2.

Treatment of Lisfranc Fracture Dislocations with an Interosseous Suture Button Technique: A Review of 3 Cases

Lisfranc fracture dislocations are complex and difficult to treat. Making the correct diagnosis and achieving an anatomical reduction are important factors in regard to achieving a favorable outcome with this injury. We describe a new technique that we have found to be useful for stabilizing Lisfranc fracture dislocations. This method is relatively fast, minimally invasive, and effective, and it eliminates the need for implant removal. To date, we have achieved predictable results for stabilizing and treating these difficult injuries with the use of a suture endobutton, instead of traditional interfragmental screw fixation. In this report, we describe 3 cases in which this method was used with satisfactory short-term results. 4.