Objective: This study conducts a comparative analysis of pension schemes in Nigeria and the United Kingdom, examining key dimensions to provide a comprehensive understanding of each system. Theoretical Framework: The research objectives focus on comparing the structural frameworks, types of pensions available (state, occupational, and personal), and adequacy of pension benefits. Method: Utilizing a non-doctrinal methodology, the study assesses investment strategies, administrative efficiency, and risk management practices to identify strengths and weaknesses. Research and Discussion: The findings reveal that the pension scheme in the United Kingdom is more robust than Nigeria's. Notably, the UK's pension scheme exhibits a gender bias, with males receiving higher income accruals than females. In contrast, Nigeria's contributory pension scheme neglects the informal sector, unlike the UK's more inclusive approach. The study's implications suggest that collaboration between Nigeria and the UK can bridge the gaps in their pension schemes. Research Implication: This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by highlighting areas for improvement in Nigeria's pension scheme. The results provide valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders seeking to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of pension systems. Originality and Value: The comparative analysis offers a unique perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of each system, informing potential reforms. Ultimately, this study aims to promote dialogue and cooperation between Nigeria and the UK to develop more equitable and efficient pension schemes. By addressing these gaps, both countries can better ensure the financial security and well-being of their citizens in retirement.
Read full abstract