Gynecologic Cancer Survivors Research Articles

Patterns of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a diverse group of gynecologic cancer survivors

ObjectivesRacial and ethnic disparities in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among gynecologic cancer survivors are not well studied. We evaluated whether individual-level characteristics were associated with PROs in diverse gynecologic cancer survivors.MethodsGynecologic cancer patients in an ambulatory oncology clinic completed a psychosocial and practical needs assessment before their appointments through the electronic medical record (EMR) patient portal. Assessments were available in English and Spanish. Fatigue, pain, physical function, depression, and anxiety were assessed with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) computer adaptive tests, and health-related quality of life was assessed by FACT-G7. PROs were dichotomized based on severity (normal/mild vs moderate/severe). Demographic and clinical information was collected. Analyses were performed using Chi-square, t-tests, and Kruskal–Wallis tests.ResultsA total of 582 women completed the assessment; 20% (n = 116) were racial minorities, and 54.5% (n = 310) were Hispanic. A total of 192 (32.8%) completed the assessments in Spanish. Hispanic patients had lower mean fatigue scores (49.31 vs 51.74, p = 0.01), and patients whose preferred language was Spanish had lower mean depression (47.63 vs 48.97, p = 0.05) and fatigue scores (48.27 vs 51.27, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the severity of PROs by race, ethnicity, or preferred language. QOL scores were worse in patients with high symptom severity for anxiety (p = 0.04) and physical functioning (p < 0.01). Current smokers had worse physical functioning (13.4% vs 6.5%, p = 0.03).ConclusionsWe found no significant differences in severity of PROs by race, ethnicity, or preferred language. Quality of life scores were worse for patients with high symptom severity for physical functioning and anxiety.

Age, comorbid conditions, and cancer: Their associations with memory impairment in postmenopausal gynecologic cancer survivors in the Women's Health Initiative

Age, comorbid conditions, and cancer: Their associations with memory impairment in postmenopausal gynecologic cancer survivors in the Women's Health Initiative

Group Appointments for Cancer Survivorship Equity (GRACE): Evaluating the use of group medical visits in rural and underserved gynecologic cancer survivors

Group Appointments for Cancer Survivorship Equity (GRACE): Evaluating the use of group medical visits in rural and underserved gynecologic cancer survivors

A look into the cancer continuum for the development of a physical activity intervention: qualitative investigation of the physical activity experiences and preferences of female cancer survivors.

Clinical guidelines recommend cancer survivors (i.e., people with a cancer diagnosis) engage in regular physical activity (PA) during and post treatment, yet most do not. Additionally, PA promotion for cancer survivors has primarily focused on post treatment, calling for an understanding of PA promotion during treatment. This study explores the PA experiences and preferences of both in-treatment and post-treatment breast and gynecologic cancer survivors (BGCS) to inform the design of a PA intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with postmenopausal women aged ≥ 50years, diagnosed with breast or gynecological cancer (stages 1-3), who were undergoing, or recently completed (12 to 24months) chemotherapy and/or primary treatment. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to explore themes. Participants (N = 26; Mage: 63.9years) had a breast (92.3%) and gynecologic (7.7%) cancer diagnosis and 46.2% (n = 12) were in treatment whereas 53.8% (n = 14) were post treatment. BGCS experienced several side effects of cancer treatment and both groups felt PA was an important goal. In-treatment BGCS focused on managing side effects (e.g., fatigue) and recognized energy fluctuated around treatments, making those periods less ideal for PA. In-treatment BGCS strongly endorsed a flexible, at-home intervention. Post-treatment BGCS emphasized recovery and relapse prevention, also favoring at-home, flexible interventions but showing greater interest towards support groups to aid with their recovery journey. Preferred activities included walking, dancing, and muscle-strengthening. Findings highlight the unique challenges postmenopausal BGCS face in participating in PA, especially in-treatment, emphasizing the importance of a tailored PA intervention.

Nutritional assessment of Chinese gynecologic cancer survivors with post-surgical lower limb lymphedema: a cross-sectional study

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the nutritional status of Chinese gynecologic cancer survivors with post-surgical lower limb lymphedema (LLL) by analyzing serum albumin levels and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI).MethodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at two Chinese medical centers. The cohort comprised 155 gynecologic cancer survivors who developed symptomatic unilateral LLL post-surgery, during the period from September 2021 to June 2024. Nutritional status was assessed by measuring serum albumin and PNI. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to identify factors associated with low serum albumin and PNI.ResultsThe mean age of the cohort was 55.47 ± 10.56 years, and the median total survival time was 72.0 months (36.5, 111.5 months). The prevalence of low serum albumin (&amp;lt; 40 g/L) was 40.0%, and low PNI (&amp;lt; 45) was 80.6%. Significant associations were found between low hemoglobin levels and both low serum albumin (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02–1.08, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and low PNI (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04–1.13, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Advanced International Society of Lymphology stage 3 was also associated with low albumin (OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03–0.99, p &amp;lt; 0.05).ConclusionThe study highlights a significant prevalence of high risk of malnutrition among Chinese gynecologic cancer survivors with LLL, underscoring the need for regular nutritional assessments and interventions.

Randomized pilot trial of an unconditional cash transfer intervention to address food insecurity in oncology.

Screening for food insecurity and other social determinants of health is being integrated into oncology practice. We performed a pilot randomized trial to investigate whether an unconditional cash transfer (UCT) could be used to address food insecurity among female breast and gynecologic cancer survivors. Food insecure cancer survivors completed a baseline survey and were randomized to receive $100/month for three months (UCT) or usual care (UC). Participants (n = 14) completed a follow-up survey after 3-months and we compared changes in health-related quality of life, indicators of food insecurity, diet quality, and whether a participant had to forgo, delay, or make changes to medical care because of cost. The UCT was associated with higher physical health scores, fewer indicators of food insecurity, better diet quality, and a lower likelihood of forgoing medical care than those who received UC. Our results suggest that UCTs can improve outcomes for food insecure cancer survivors.

Feasibility and pilot study of Indonesia’s first telehealth support program for gynecological cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy

Most Indonesian gynecological cancer survivors experience chemotherapy side effects on their physical and mental health as they face unmet needs of supportive care, which increases the likelihood of discontinuing treatment. Interventions in telehealth assist survivors in resolving these issues. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of fighting distress, self-efficacy, health effects, and sexual (FoRSHE-X) interventions and evaluate their potential impact on distress level, side effects knowledge and management, self-efficacy, and sexual quality of life. The study involved gynecological cancer survivors who underwent chemotherapy and participated in ten weeks of individual social media-based education, tele-coaching, and teleconsultations, from September 2023 to June 2024. The study feasibility and pilot outcomes were evaluated using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. Of the twelve women recruited, six (50%) completed the study, filled out pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, and participated in interviews. Fifty-four virtual education, coaching, and consultation sessions were performed individually. The statistical results indicated that participants were highly satisfied with the telehealth program, which significantly increased their knowledge (p=0.02), health practices (p=0.04), and self-efficacy (p=0.01). The qualitative analysis highlighted participants' and coaches' perspectives on the study’s acceptance, barriers, and recommendations. In conclusion, this pilot study suggests that a definitive trial to assess the FoRSHE-X interventions is feasible, acceptable, and can be applied not only to gynecological cancer survivors but also to other types of cancer, thereby broadening the potential impact of the study.

Examining the feasibility of a dietetic intervention on body composition in irish breast and gynaecological cancer survivors: The LYSA trial

Examining the feasibility of a dietetic intervention on body composition in irish breast and gynaecological cancer survivors: The LYSA trial

23 - Pelvic rehabilitation for gynecological cancer survivors with vaginal stenosis

23 - Pelvic rehabilitation for gynecological cancer survivors with vaginal stenosis

From Treatment to Recovery: Gynecological Survivors' and Caregivers' Perspectives About the Usability of an Educational Resource.

The objective of this study was to understand gynecological cancer (GC) survivors' and their informal caregivers' perceptions about the usability of an educational resource to support their transition from primary cancer treatment into surveillance and/or recovery. After developing an empirical- and experiential-informed educational resource, we used a semi-structured questioning process to understand GC survivors and their caregivers' perceptions about its usability. Data were collected via online focus groups or 1:1 interviews that were audio recorded and transcribed. We used thematic analysis to analyze the data. Ten participants who were survivors or informal caregivers of cervical, ovarian, or uterine/endometrial cancer participated in two rounds of data collection. We grouped qualitative data into two themes: (1) reputable, relevant, and accessible education reduces uncertainty and promotes connection, and (2) individualized delivery of education provided by trusted cancer clinicians. The transition from treatment to surveillance is a challenging time for which reputable, relevant, and accessible educational resources are useful to facilitate an understanding about and self-management of survivorship-related concerns. Survivors and caregivers look to clinicians to provide reputable education to address their needs. This education should be diverse in content and referred to repeatedly throughout the cancer trajectory.

Gynecologic cancer survivor preferences for provider communication regarding sexual health after treatment: a qualitative study.

Survivorship from gynecologic cancers is becoming increasingly prevalent. There are significant sexual side effects that influence quality of life that would be reduced with proper intervention; however, existing literature highlights the lack of understanding of the sexual health needs within this population. Furthermore, multiple studies show that one contributing factor to sexual well-being in survivorship is provider-patient communication. The aim of this study is to explore experiences of sexual distress and survivor experiences of sexual health communication. Adult participants who had been out of active treatment for 3months were recruited to participate in focus groups. Six focus groups (n = 32) were conducted with survivors of gynecologic cancers via Zoom. Research team members analyzed content using thematic analysis. Two broad themes were identified: Experiences of provider communication and Preferences for provider communication, with subthemes nested under both. Subthemes from the Experiences theme included absent/lacking communication, negative experiences, emotional reaction to lack of communication, and feeling like sexuality was not valued. Subthemes from the Preferences theme included more conversation and open communication about sexuality, more resources/referrals, and more provider training on sexuality. Survivor experiences of subjective sexual health are often dependent on the type and quality of information they receive from their healthcare team during treatment. Unfortunately, the majority of participants endorsed negative or absent communication related to their sexual health needs, leading to additional distress.

CN76 A study of sexual dysfunction in Moroccan female survivors of gynaecological cancer: A prospective study about 220 patients

CN76 A study of sexual dysfunction in Moroccan female survivors of gynaecological cancer: A prospective study about 220 patients

Quality of Life of Breast and Gynaecological Cancer Survivors Undergoing Chemotherapy Treatment

Quality of Life of Breast and Gynaecological Cancer Survivors Undergoing Chemotherapy Treatment

Analysis of assisted reproductive outcomes for gynecologic cancer survivors: a retrospective study

ObjectiveTo examine the reproductive outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in gynecologic cancer patients and to assess maternal and neonatal complications.MethodsWomen diagnosed with gynecologic cancer who underwent their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment between 2013 and 2021 at Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics and IVF Institute were included in this study. Infertile women without any history of cancer were matched to the cancer group. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate. Baseline and follow-up data were compared between groups using Student’s t-tests for normally distributed variables and with Chi-square test for categorical variables. A propensity score-based patient-matching approach was adopted to ensure comparability between individuals with and without specific cancer type.ResultsA total of 136 patients with a history of gynecologic cancer and 241 healthy infertile controls were included in this study. Endometrial cancer constituted 50.70% of the cases and cervical cancer constituted 34.60% of the cases. The cancer group exhibited significantly shorter duration of stimulation, lower levels of estradiol, lower number of retrieved oocytes, day-3 embryos, and blastocysts compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The cumulative live birth rate of the gynecologic cancer group was significantly lower than that of the control group (36.10% vs. 60.50%, P < 0.001). Maternal and neonatal complications did not significantly differ between the groups (P > 0.05). The endometrial cancer and cervical cancer groups showed significantly lower cumulative live birth rates than their matched controls (38.60% vs. 64.50%, P = 0.011 and 24.20% vs. 68.60%, P < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsThese findings highlight the decreased occurrence of pregnancy and live birth in female gynecologic cancer patients undergoing ART, particularly in endometrial cancers and cervical cancers. These findings have important implications for counseling and managing gynecologic cancer patients undergoing ART.

P-582 Analysis of assisted reproductive outcomes for gynecologic cancer survivors: a retrospective study

Abstract Study question Do women diagnosed with gynecologic cancer have worse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) ? Summary answer Decreased live birth rate was observed in female gynecologic cancer patients undergoing ART, particularly in endometrial cancers and cervical cancers. What is known already Gynecologic malignancies comprise approximately 13% of female cancer diagnoses, and oncological treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy, and hormonotherapy may induce infertility, premature ovarian failure, or early menopause, resulting in a loss of reproductive potential. ART has emerged as an important option for cancer patients undergoing treatment, but the reproductive outcomes of ART among cancer survivors remain poorly understood. Limited research exists regarding the impact of a history of gynecologic cancer on reproductive outcomes of ART. Study design, size, duration 136 women diagnosed with gynecologic cancer who underwent their first IVF/ICSI treatment between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. 241 infertile women without any history of cancer were matched to the cancer group. Participants/materials, setting, methods Women diagnosed with gynecologic cancer who underwent their first IVF/ICSI treatment between 2013 and 2021 were included. Infertile women without any history of cancer were matched to the cancer group. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate. A propensity score-based patient-matching approach was adopted to ensure comparability between individuals with and without specific cancer type. Main results and the role of chance A total of 136 patients with a history of gynecologic cancer and 241 healthy infertile controls were included in this study. Endometrial cancer constituted 50.70% of the cases and cervical cancer constituted 34.60% of the cases. The cancer group exhibited significant shorter duration of stimulation, lower levels of estradiol, lower number of retrieved oocytes, day-3 embryos, and blastocysts compared to the control group (P &amp;lt; 0.05). The cumulative live birth rate of the gynecologic cancer group was significantly lower than that of the control group (36.10% vs. 60.50%, P &amp;lt; 0.001). Maternal and neonatal complications did not significantly differ between the groups (P &amp;gt; 0.05). The endometrial cancer and cervical cancer groups showed significantly lower cumulative live birth rates than their matched controls (38.60% vs. 64.50%, P = 0.011 and 24.20% vs. 68.60%, P &amp;lt; 0.001, respectively). Limitations, reasons for caution Our study was limited by the retrospective design in nature and small sample size of its patient cohort. In addition, the effect of cancer treatments was not evaluated specifically in the current study due to the limited number of patients and possible inconsistency in surgical operations. Wider implications of the findings Our study provides data support for further exploration of the effects of endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, and other gynecologic cancers on fertility. Comprehensive ovarian function assessment, detailed counseling, individualized fertility guidance, and close follow-up after ART therapy are recommended for patients with gynecologic malignancy history. Trial registration number Not applicable

Psychological distress, sexual satisfaction and quality of life of gynaecological cancer patients and their spouses during cancer survivorship: A comparison of husbands and wives.

To investigate the psychological distress, sexual satisfaction, and quality of life of gynaecological cancer survivors and their spouses during cancer survivorship. The survival rate of patients with cancer is increasing owing to advances in medical treatment technology. Spouses are the closest companions of gynaecological cancer survivors. Patients with gynaecological cancer and their spouses face different situations and challenges after experiencing cancer invasion. Questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. Convenience sampling was employed, and 180 participants, including patients with gynaecological cancer and their spouses, were enrolled. A structured questionnaire was used to investigate the psychological distress, sexual satisfaction, and quality of life of gynaecological cancer survivors and their spouses during acute, extended, and permanent survivorship. The STROBE checklist guided the study preparation. For gynaecological cancer survivors and their spouses, (1) severe psychological distress was present during acute survivorship, with anxiety extending until permanent survivorship; (2) no significant differences were observed in pre- and post-treatment sexual satisfaction, although pre-treatment sexual satisfaction was higher than post-treatment sexual satisfaction in all three cancer survivorship stages and (3) quality of life decreased during acute survivorship and gradually improved with time. Psychological distress, sexual satisfaction and quality of life of gynaecological cancer survivors and their spouses worsened during acute survivorship and improved over time until permanent survivorship. Gynaecological cancer survivors and their spouses experience anxiety and depression from diagnosis confirmation until permanent survivorship (>5 years survival). Therefore, clinical nurses' sensitivity to emotional distress in cancer survivors and their spouses can be improved and a consistent and routine evaluation method has been established for the early detection of such emotional distress. The results of this study can provide a reference for clinical healthcare professionals and contribute to a better quality of care.

Developing a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Gynecologic Cancer Survivors Undergoing Pelvic Exams

Regular pelvic exams after completing cancer treatment are critical for detecting endometrial and cervical cancer recurrence. Patients report high levels of distress and pain during exams. We conducted in-depth individual interviews with patients (N = 13) and providers (N = 10) to explore patients’ pelvic exam experiences and intervention preferences. Findings suggested that most patients experience exam-related distress and pain, and a telemedicine cognitive behavioral intervention targeting anxiety and pain would be acceptable and feasible for most patients. Findings informed PEACE (Pelvic Examination and Anxiety Coping skills for Empowerment) intervention development. Formative work is described, including a conceptual model, qualitative data collection and analysis, and session content.

NRG-CC004 ancillary data study-exploring the effect of bupropion on sexual desire in female cancer survivors with and without vulvovaginal symptoms.

Female cancer survivors often experience estrogen-deprivation symptoms, which may lead to decreases in sexual desire, vulvovaginal health (lubrication, dryness, discomfort), and sexual satisfaction. Interventions are needed to address these concerns. The objective of this secondary analysis was to determine if women with higher (better) scores on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) lubrication and pain subscales reported higher desire scores based on treatment with bupropion vs placebo. Participants were part of NRG Oncology's NRG-CC004 (NCT03180294), a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating bupropion (150 vs 300mg) to improve sexual desire in survivors of breast or gynecologic cancer. All participants with baseline data from the FSFI lubrication, pain, and desire subscales with 5- and/or 9-week data were analyzed. The FSFI subscale scores were correlated using Spearman correlation coefficients. Logistic regression was used to determine associations between FSFI desire and other FSFI subscales while accounting for treatment arm and other covariates. The primary outcome of NRG Oncology's NRG-CC004 (NCT03180294) randomized phase II dose-finding trial was change from baseline to 9weeks on the FSFI desire subscale score. Similar to the parent study, the primary outcome for this ancillary data study was the FSFI desire subscale score at 5 and 9weeks. Overall, 230 participants completed the FSFI at baseline and 189 at 9weeks. The strongest correlations were between lubrication and pain at baseline (all participants, rho= 0.77; bupropion arms, rho = 0.82), week 5 (all participants, rho = 0.71; bupropion arms, rho = 0.68), and week 9 (all participants, rho = 0.75; bupropion arms, rho = 0.78), and the weakest correlations were between desire and pain. In patients in the treatment arms there were no interactions between lubrication or pain.The impact of various covariates on the FSFI score for desire at 9weeks demonstrated that participants of non-White race (odds ratio [OR],0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.81; P= .010), with a high lubrication score (OR,0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.61; P= .0002), with a high pain score (less pain) (OR,0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.87; P= .014), or with prior pelvic surgery (OR,0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.63; P= .0002) had lower odds of having low desire. Acute estrogen-deprivation symptoms should be addressed prior to sexual desire intervention. This secondary analysis was not powered to examine all variables. Lubrication and pain were predictors of low desire. Therefore, vulvovaginal atrophy and associated genitourinary symptoms of menopause such as vaginal dryness and dyspareunia should be addressed prior to or in parallel with interventions for sexual desire.

Uterus Transplantation as Infertility Treatment in Gynecological Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Background: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence regarding the acceptance of uterine transplantation as infertility treatment among gynecological cancer survivors, surgical and pregnancy outcomes post-transplantation for gynecological cancer survivors, as well as relevant adverse events. Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for records published since 2000, and extensive reference screening was performed. Results: Out of 1901 unique records identified, 7 are included in this review; 4 examined the proportion of gynecological cancer survivors among applicants for uterine transplantation, 2 examined rejection rates, pregnancy rates, and outcomes after uterine transplantation among gynecological cancer survivors, and 2 reported the frequency of relevant adverse events. Among the applicants, 60/701 (8.6%) were gynecological cancer survivors, only 1 transplanted patient was a cervical cancer survivor and achieved two live births after eight embryo transfers, and 2/27 (7.4%) of uterus transplantation recipients were diagnosed with CIN post-transplantation. Conclusions: Uterus transplantation can be regarded as an infertility treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI), although only one gynecological cancer survivor has received a uterus transplantation. The efficacy, safety, and ethical considerations for gynecological cancer survivors need to be addressed for uterine transplantation to become an infertility treatment option for AUFI among gynecological cancer survivors.

Lower Limb Lymphedema Awareness among Gynecological Cancer Patients: An International Survey Supported by the European Network of Gynecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Group.

Patient awareness of postoperative lymphedema in the field of gynecologic oncology has been poorly documented in the international literature. We wished to capture and document the awareness among gynecological cancer survivors about postoperative lymphedema, including aspects such as the adequacy of perioperative counseling, management, and quality of life. A web-based survey comprising 25 multiple-choice questions was distributed to gynecological cancer advocacy groups within the European Network of Gynecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) group. The survey was validated in a pilot group of gynecological patients prior to distribution. Overall, 386 women from 20 countries completed the questionnaire. Only half of the patients (n = 211) knew what lymphedema is, whereas 52% of the respondents stated that they were never informed at their pre-operative assessment about the potential risk of developing lymphedema. Fifty-three percent of those women who were informed about the risk and management of lymphedema received information through self-initiative, connecting mainly with patient groups or online. Approximately 84% of patients with lymphedema reported that they informed their doctor about their symptoms. Ninety-four patients (55.3%, which is not 55% of the 386) were treated for lymphedema. Forty-five women out of 136 reported that lymphedema significantly affected their everyday lives. We report a large lack of awareness and a significant gap of knowledge about the risks and treatment options related to postoperative lymphedema among gynecological cancer survivors. Institutional practice routines and awareness among professionals need to be urgently recalled and adapted to adequately inform and support gynecological cancer patients.