The integration of palliative care and standard oncologic care improves quality of life, symptoms, and survival outcomes in cancer patients. Radiation oncologists (RO) provide palliative services to many of these patients near the end of life. We sought to determine how RO document the management of symptoms for oncology patients receiving palliative radiation therapy (RT) for metastatic disease at the end of life. RO electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 3,128 cancer patients from a single academic institution that had at least one hospital contact within their last 6 months of life. From this decedent database, patients with metastatic disease who received palliative RT were identified. All RO clinical notes within patients’ last 6 months of life were reviewed for documentation of symptoms, management, response to treatment, and subsequent disposition, including referrals to hospice and palliative care. There were 572 clinical encounters among 203 patients (2008-2011), ranging in age from 19-88 years old. Clinical notes included follow-up (FU) (n=111), end of treatment (EOT) (n=231), reevaluation (n=83), and consult notes (n=138). The most common documented symptom was pain (n=262), followed by neurologic symptoms (n=23). Pain score was documented 34% of the time with an average score of 6.8 (range 0-10). Patients reported an average of 1.4 pain sites per encounter with the most common sites being back (n=58) and hips (n=47). This was addressed in the treatment plan 86% of the time. The documented method of addressing symptoms included RT 74% of the time, further workup 11%, medication 7%, and a combination of treatments the remainder of the time. Response to prior RT was reported 40% of the time. There was a reported improvement in symptoms following RT in 30% of EOT notes, no improvement in 17%, no mention of response in 52%, and the focus was new pain due to recurrence in 1%. There was a reported improvement in symptoms following RT in 40% of FU notes, no improvement in 11%, no mention of response in 20%, and the focus was new pain in 29%. Overall though, 65% of patients (n=131) did not have any FU to evaluate. When RO provide palliative RT to patients with metastatic disease at the end of life, documentation consistently demonstrates RO address pain as a part of the plan. Still, a large number of patients lack documentation regarding the outcome of the intervention. Proper documentation is crucial for communication between palliative specialists and to ensure the most efficient and effective therapies are delivered during end of life. Our institution desires to implement a standardized assessment and follow-up form, gauging patients’ symptomatic control and perceived response to treatment, to facilitate improved multidisciplinary palliative care and referral. Outcome of this intervention is eagerly anticipated.