Survival After Recurrence Research Articles

Clinicopathological and molecular biological characteristics of early-onset stage II/III colorectal adenocarcinoma: An analysis of 25 studies with 47,184 patients (pts) in the adjuvant colon cancer end points (ACCENT) database.

4099 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality has decreased since the 1970s but the incidence is increasing in young adults (age 20-49). The incidence of early onset CRC (eoCRC) will keep increasing significantly based on the trends of the SEER CRC registry data. There is limited data suggesting eoCRC may have different behaviors compared to traditional CRC (tCRC, age ≥ 50). Methods: Individual pt data of 47184 stage II/III CRC pts from 25 randomized studies in the ACCENT database were pooled. The distributions of demographics, clinicopathological features, biomarker status, and treatment-related data were summarized by age group. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free rate (RFR), and survival after recurrence (SAR) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models stratified by treatment arms within studies, adjusting for stage, performance status (PS), BMI and grade. Results: Using 5% difference between age groups as clinically meaningful cutoff, eoCRC had similar gender, race, ethnicity, PS, risk group, disease sidedness and T stage as tCRC. eoCRC were less likely overweight (30 vs 36%) and more pts had ≥ 12 lymph nodes resected (63 vs 51%). eoCRC had more frequent dMMR status (18 vs 12%), less BRAF mutations (5 vs 13%), and more dMMR/BRAF wild type (WT) status (17 vs 7%). Overall, eoCRC had better OS, DFS, and SAR, with the most significant differences between the < 30 and > = 70 age groups. Similar results were observed within pMMR pts. eoCRC experienced less hematological side effects, diarrhea, and stomatitis, but had more nausea and/or vomiting. Conclusions: eoCRC have unique characteristics; although statistically significant, the clinical differences in outcomes between eoCRC and tCRC are potentially due to the difference seen in extremely young and old pts. eoCRC have a different adverse events panel compared to tCRC. [Table: see text]

Care or palliation for recurrent hepatocarcinoma: a multicentric national analysis of survival

Background and Aims: How to treat recurrent hepatocarcinoma (HCC) is still an open debate.The aim was to compare the Survival after Recurrence(SAR) of curative (RedoSurgery or ThermoAblation) versus palliative (Trans-arterial-chemo-embolization or Systemic Therapies) treatments for recurrent HCC.

Evaluation of the change of outcomes over a 10-year period in patients with stage III colon cancer: pooled analysis of 6501 patients treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in the ACCENT database

Since 2004, adjuvant 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX or FLOX) have been the standard of care for patients with resected colon cancer. Herein we examine the change of outcomes over a 10-year period in patients with stage III colon cancer who received this regimen. Individual patient data from the ACCENT database was used to compare the outcomes in older (1998-2003) and newer (2004-2009) treatment eras for patients with stage III colon cancer who received adjuvant FOLFOX or FLOX. The outcomes were compared between the two groups by the multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model adjusting for age, sex, performance score, T stage, N stage, tumor sidedness, and histological grade. A total of 6501 patients with stage III colon cancer who received adjuvant FOLFOX or FLOX in six randomized trials were included in the analysis. Patients enrolled in the new era group experienced statistically significant improvement in time to recurrence [3-year rate, 76.1% versus 73.0%; adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj)= 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.92), P= 0.0008], disease-free survival (DFS) [3-year rate, 74.7% versus 72.3%; HRadj= 0.88 (0.79-0.98), P= 0.024], survival after recurrence (SAR) [median time, 27.0 versus 17.7 months; HRadj= 0.65 (0.57-0.74), P<0.0001], and overall survival (OS) [5-year rate, 80.9% versus 75.7%; HRadj= 0.78 (0.69-0.88), P < 0.0001]. The improved outcomes remained in patients diagnosed at 45 years of age or older, low-risk patients (T1-3 and N1), left colon, mismatch repair proficient (pMMR), BRAF, and KRAS wild-type tumors. Improved outcomes were observed in patients with stage III colon cancer enrolled in clinical trials who received adjuvant FOLFOX/FLOX therapy in 2004 or later compared with patients in the older era. Prolonged SAR calls for revalidation of 3-year DFS as the surrogate endpoint of OS in adjuvant clinical trials and reevaluation of optimal follow-up of OS to confirm the trial findings based on the DFS endpoints. NCT00079274; NCT00096278; NCT00004931; NCT00275210; NCT00265811; NCT00112918.

Proposed Definition for Oligometastatic Recurrence in Biliary Tract Cancer Based on Results of Locoregional Treatment: A Propensity-Score-Stratified Analysis.

Oligometastatic recurrence involves relapsed tumors for which locoregional treatment (LT) may yield a survival benefit. However, there are no clear criteria for selecting patients for LT or determining the effects of LT in recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the effects of LT on survival outcomes and to identify potential criteria for selecting LT in recurrent BTC. In the present work, 232 consecutive patients with recurrent BTC who initially underwent curative surgery between 1996 and 2015 were evaluated. The primary outcome was length of survival after recurrence (SAR). Propensity score stratification with various tumor-related factors was used to identify patients who would likely benefit from LT. Among the cohort, 60 (25.9%) patients underwent LT, whereas 172 (74.1%) patients did not. The multivariate Cox model identified carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels of > 50 U/mL, multiorgan recurrence, tumor number > 3, tumor size > 30mm, and early recurrence (≤ 1year) as independent predictors of poor SAR (P < 0.001 for each factor). In the propensity-score-stratified analysis, LT was associated with survival benefits for patients representing single-organ recurrence with at most three tumors and late-onset recurrence (> 1year) (median SAR: 48.6 vs. 14.2months, n = 33 vs. n = 34, hazard ratio: 0.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.20, P < 0.001). Patients with recurrent BTC may benefit from LT if they have single-organ recurrence with at most three tumors and late-onset recurrence. We propose that these patients may have clinically relevant "oligometastatic recurrence" of BTC.

Management of isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence after surgery for colorectal cancer.

PurposeThe rare incidence of isolated para-aortic lymph node (PALN) recurrence of colorectal cancer has precluded the formulation of treatment guidelines. This study evaluated and compared the effects of different treatment modalities on survival outcomes in patients with PALN recurrence.MethodsPatients diagnosed with isolated PALN recurrence after curative resection for primary colorectal cancer from January 2004 to December 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with isolated recurrence were selected using imaging modalities. Overall survival (OS) and survival after recurrence (SAR) were analyzed and compared between different treatments using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsThe median OS was 64 months with a median follow-up time of 50 months. Of the 46 patients with PALN recurrence, 35 (76.1%) had isolated recurrences. Of these 35 patients, 16 underwent PALN resection and 19 received chemotherapy. Median SAR was significantly longer in patients who did than did not undergo resection (71 months vs. 39 months, P = 0.017). Median OS tended to be longer in patients who did than did not undergo resection (77 months vs. 62 months, P = 0.055). SAR was similar in patients who received radiotherapy and those who underwent resection (34 months vs. 46 months, P = 0.146). Three of 16 patients (18.8%) who underwent resection were found to be recurrence-free.ConclusionSurgical resection of isolated PALN recurrence may benefit patients, with favorable survival outcomes and by providing definitive diagnosis for proper treatment planning.

Management and clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent/progressive ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) with recurrence/progression after treatment has dismal prognosis. We aimed to investigate the management and outcomes of such patients. OCCC patients who were treated between 2000 and 2013 with cancer recurrence or progression after primary treatment were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the independent predictors of survival after recurrence (SAR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A total of 64 patients experienced treatment failure (49 recurred after remission and 15 progressed without remission). The 5-year CSS rates of recurrent/progressive OCCC patients were 22.9% (progression group: median CSS 5.9 months [range, 0.8-25.2] vs recurrence group: 43.6 months [range, 7.1-217.8]; p<0.001). Patients with solitary recurrence had significantly better SAR than those with disseminated relapse (median: not reached vs 10.4 months, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, six models each for SAR and CSS were formulated alternatively including highly correlated variables for the recurrence group. Of these models, solitary relapse pattern (HR: 0.07, p<0.001), progression-free interval (PFI)>12 months (HR: 0.22-0.40, p=0.001 and p=0.023), CA125<35U/mL at initial recurrence (HR: 0.32, p=0.007), and overall salvage treatment including radiotherapy (HR: 0.19, p=0.001) were significant predictors of favorable SAR. The same significant predictors were selected for CSS. Recurrent OCCC can be treated with curative intent if the relapse is solitary and can be completely resected or encompassed with radiotherapy, whereas novel therapies are needed for disseminated relapse or progression during primary treatment.

Prognosis of microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair deficiency stage III colon cancer patients after disease recurrence following adjuvant treatment: results of an ACCENT pooled analysis of seven studies

BackgroundMicrosatellite instable/deficient mismatch repair (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancers have been reported to have a poor prognosis. Frequent co-occurrence of MSI/dMMR and BRAFV600E complicates the association. Patients and methodsPatients with resected stage III colon cancer (CC) from seven adjuvant studies with available data for disease recurrence and MMR and BRAFV600E status were analyzed. The primary end point was survival after recurrence (SAR). Associations of markers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, performance status, T stage, N stage, primary tumor location, grade, KRAS status, and timing of recurrence. ResultsAmong 2630 patients with cancer recurrence (1491 men [56.7%], mean age, 58.5 [19–85] years), multivariable analysis revealed that patients with MSI/dMMR tumors had significantly longer SAR than did patients with microsatellite stable/proficient MMR tumors (MSS/pMMR) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.69–0.98; P = 0.029). This finding remained when looking at patients treated with standard oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens only (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58–1.00; P = 0.048). Same trends for SAR were observed when analyzing MSI/dMMR versus MSS/pMMR tumor subgroups lacking BRAFV600E (aHR, 0.84; P = 0.10) or those harboring BRAFV600E (aHR, 0.88; P = 0.43), without reaching statistical significance. Furthermore, SAR was significantly shorter in tumors with BRAFV600E versus those lacking this mutation (aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.73–2.46; P < 0.0001), even in the subgroup of MSI/dMMR tumors (aHR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.67–4.21; P < 0.0001). Other factors associated with a shorter SAR were as follows: older age, male gender, T4/N2, proximal primary tumor location, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and early recurrence. ConclusionsIn stage III CC patients recurring after adjuvant chemotherapy, and before the era of immunotherapy, the MSI/dMMR phenotype was associated with a better SAR compared with MSS/pMMR. BRAFV600E mutation was a poor prognostic factor for both MSI/dMMR and MSS/pMMR patients. Trial identification numbersNCT00079274, NCT00265811, NCT00004931, NCT00004931, NCT00026273, NCT00096278, NCT00112918.

Influence of Molecular Status on Recurrence Site in Patients Treated for a Stage III Colon Cancer: a Post Hoc Analysis of the PETACC-8 Trial

Recurrence patterns in stage III colon cancer (CC) patients according to molecular markers remain unclear. The objective of the study was to assess recurrence patterns according to microsatellite instability (MSI), RAS and BRAFV600E status in stage III CC patients. All stage III CC patients from the PETACC-8 randomized trial tested for MSI, RAS and BRAFV600E status were included. The site and characteristics of recurrence were analyzed according to molecular status. Survival after recurrence (SAR) was analyzed. A total of 1650 patients were included. Recurrence occurred in 434 patients (26.3%). Microsatellite stable (MSS) patients had a significantly higher recurrence rate (27.2% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.02) with a trend to more pulmonary recurrence (28.8% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.06) when compared to MSI patients. MSI patients experienced more regional lymph nodes compared to MSS (12.9% vs. 4%, P = 0.046). In the MSS population, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in RAS (32.2%) or BRAF (32.3%) patients when compared to double wild-type patients (19.9%) (p < 0.001); no preferential site of recurrence was observed according to RAS and BRAFV600E mutations. Finally, decreased SAR was observed in the case of peritoneal recurrence or more than two recurrence sites. Microsatellite, RAS and BRAFV600E status influences recurrence rates in stage III CC patients. However, only microsatellite status seems to be associated with specific recurrence patterns. More than two recurrence sites and recurrence in the peritoneum were associated with poorer SAR.

Relative contribution of clinical and molecular features to outcome within low and high risk T and N groups in stage III colon cancer (CC).

3520 Background: Duration of adjuvant FOLFOX or CAPOX for stage III CC is being guided by pt stratification into low (T1-3N1) and high (T4 or N2) risk groups based on the IDEA study. We determined the relative contributions of clinical and molecular features for prediction of time-to-recurrence (TTR) and survival after recurrence (SAR) within each risk group. Methods: Stage III CC (N=5,430) from 2 trials of adjuvant FOLFOX ± cetuximab with similar outcome by study arm [NCCTG N0147 (Alliance), PETACC-8] were used. Tumors were analyzed for mismatch repair (dMMR vs pMMR), mutations in KRAS (exon 2) and BRAFV600E. Median pt follow-up was 83.4 months. Relative contributions to predicting outcome were assessed using χ2 (Harrell’s rms) based on multivariable (MV) Cox models. Results: N (50.8%) and T (31.8%) stage were the top two contributors to prediction of TTR which supports risk grouping. High risk (n=2566) vs low risk (n=2774) pts had poorer TTR (HR 2.7, 95% CI, 2.4-3.0) and SAR [HR 1.6 (1.4-1.9)], both p&lt;.0001. TTR: KRAS contributed the most to predicting TTR among high (58.6%) and low (51.1%) risk pts (Table). Contribution of MMR (16%) to predicting TTR was limited to low risk pts. Contribution of BRAFV600E to TTR was nearly 3-fold increased in high vs low risk pts. SAR: BRAFV600E contributed the most to predicting SAR, especially in high vs low risk pts (2-fold increase). Tumor sidedness and performance status (PS) were key contributors to SAR, but not TTR. MV associations: TTR: low risk, KRAS [HR 1.7 (1.4-2.3], MMR [HR 0.55 (.35-.87), gender (M/F) [HR 1.3 (1.0-1.5)], all p&lt;.04]; high risk: BRAF [HR 1.3 (1.1-1.7)], sidedness (R vs L) [HR 1.14 (1.0-1.3)], KRAS [HR 1.4 (1.2-1.6)], all p&lt;.04]. SAR: BRAF, sidedness, PS (all p&lt;.05). Conclusions: KRAS mutation was the strongest predictor of shorter TTR in both risk groups whereas BRAFV600E was the primary driver of SAR, especially in high risk pts. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi. NCT00079274.[Table: see text]

Prognosis of microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair deficiency stage III colon cancer patients after disease recurrence: Results of an accent meta-analysis of seven studies.

3525 Background: Microsatellite instable/deficient mismatch repair (MSI) metastatic colorectal cancers have been reported to be of poor prognosis. The interaction between MSI and BRAFV600E mutation complicates the picture. Methods: Patients with resected stage III CC from 7 studies with disease recurrence and data available for MSI and BRAFV600E status were analyzed. The primary endpoint was survival after recurrence (SAR) to assess the prognostic roles of MSI and BRAFV600E, respectively. Associations of markers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinicopathologic features (data collected 12/1998 to 11/2009). Results: Among 2630 patients with cancer recurrence (1491 men [56.7%], mean age, 58.5 [19-85] years), multivariable analysis revealed that patients with MSI tumors (n = 220) had significantly better SAR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98; P = .029) than patients with microsatellite stable /proficient MMR (MSS) tumors (n = 1766). This was also observed when looking at patients treated by the standard FOLFOX adjuvant regimen only (aHR, 0.76; 0.58-1.00; P = .048). Same trends were observed when looking at MSI/dMMR patients outcome in BRAFV600E wild-type (aHR, 0.84; P = .10) and mutant (aHR, 0.88; P = .43) subgroups separately, without reaching statistical significance. As previously described poor SAR was observed in BRAFV600E mutants vs wild type patients (n = 244; aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.73-2.46; P &lt; .0001) and this was also true in BRAFV600E mutants MSI/dMMR patients (n = 77, aHR, 2.65 ; 95% CI, 1.67-4.21; p &lt; .0001). Other factors associated with a poor SAR were : olderage, male gender, T4/N2, proximal primary tumor location, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and early recurrence (by 1y increase). Conclusions: In stage III colon cancer patients recurring after adjuvant chemotherapy and before the era of immuno-oncologic agents, MSI/dMMR was associated with a better survival compared to MSS. BRAFV600E mutation seems to be a poor prognostic factor for both MSI/dMMR and MSS/pMMR patients.

Association of pathway mutation with survival after recurrence in colorectal cancer patients treated with adjuvant fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy

BackgroundAlthough the prognostic biomarkers associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) survival are well known, there are limited data on the association between the molecular characteristics and survival after recurrence (SAR). The purpose of this study was to assess the association between pathway mutations and SAR.MethodsOf the 516 patients with stage III or high risk stage II CRC patients treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, 87 who had distant recurrence were included in the present study. We analyzed the association between SAR and mutations of 40 genes included in the five critical pathways of CRC (WNT, P53, RTK-RAS, TGF-β, and PI3K).ResultsMutation of genes within the WNT, P53, RTK-RAS, TGF-β, and PI3K pathways were shown in 69(79.3%), 60(69.0%), 57(65.5%), 21(24.1%), and 19(21.8%) patients, respectively. Patients with TGF-β pathway mutation were younger and had higher incidence of mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) histology and microsatellite instability-high. TGF-β pathway mutation (median SAR of 21.6 vs. 44.4 months, p = 0.021) and MAC (20.0 vs. 44.4 months, p = 0.003) were associated with poor SAR, and receiving curative resection after recurrence was associated with favorable SAR (Not reached vs. 23.6 months, p < 0.001). Mutations in genes within other critical pathways were not associated with SAR. When MAC was excluded as a covariate, multivariate analysis revealed TGF-β pathway mutation and curative resection after distant recurrence as an independent prognostic factor for SAR. The impact of TGF-β pathway mutations were predicted using the PROVEAN, SIFT, and PolyPhen-2. Among 25 mutations, 23(92.0%)-24(96.0%) mutations were predicted to be damaging mutation.ConclusionsMutation in genes within TGF-β pathway may have negative prognostic role for SAR in CRC. Other pathway mutations were not associated with SAR.

Surgery for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Achieving Long-term Survival.

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC recurs with high incidence after liver resection. Little is known about long-term outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for recurrent HCC. Among 989 patients who underwent R0/R1 liver resection for HCC between 1995 and 2014, 676 patients who exhibited recurrence were included. Repeat surgery was performed in 128 patients (RS group), and not in the remaining 548 patients (NS group). Prognostic value after repeat surgery was evaluated by comparing survival after recurrence (SAR) between the RS and NS groups. Subgroup analyses according to the 3 recurrence patterns [intrahepatic recurrence (IHR), extrahepatic recurrence (EHR), and intra plus extrahepatic recurrence (IHR + EHR)] were performed. Seventy-three of 430 patients (17.0%) with IHR, 17 of 57 patients (29.8%) with EHR, and 38 of 189 patients (20.1%) with IH + EHR underwent repeat surgery. Compared with the NS group, the RS group had better liver function and their time to recurrence was significantly longer (16.5 vs 11.4 months; P < 0.001). In the overall and 3 recurrence patterns, the 5-year SAR rate was better in the RS group compared with the NS group (RS vs NS group; overall, 53.0% vs 25.7%; IHR, 73.8% vs 37.2%; EHR, 30.0% vs 0%; IHR + EHR, 34.1% vs 10.6%; all P < 0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, repeat surgery was identified as an independent factor for better SAR (P < 0.001). Surgery for recurrent HCC may yield long-term survival for not only IHR but also for EHR in selected patients.

Factors influencing survival after recurrence in osteosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Despite drastic improvement in overall survival for pediatric patients with cancer, those with osteosarcoma have stable rates of survival since the 1980s. This project evaluates the effect of several variables on survival after first recurrence in patients with osteosarcoma. Data from three prospective North American cooperative group trials for newly diagnosed osteosarcoma are included: INT-0133, POG-9754, and AOST0121. The analytic population for this study is all enrolled patients with first event-free survival (EFS) event of relapse. The primary outcome measure for this retrospective analysis was survival after recurrence (SAR). The analytic population consisted of N=431 patients. SAR was statistically significantly associated with age at enrollment(<10 years, P=0.027), presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis (localized, P<0.0001), site of relapse (combination lung + bone, unfavorable, P=0.005), and time to first relapse (2+ years, favorable, P<0.0001) in multivariate analysis. Ethnicity, primary site of tumor, race, and sex were not significantly related to SAR. Prolonged SAR in patients with relapsed osteosarcoma is associated with age, extent of disease at diagnosis, site of and time to relapse. Adolescent and young adult patients with osteosarcoma have shorter SAR than younger patients, consistent with studies showing decreased overall survival in this group. Although patients with primary metastatic disease have shorter SAR, there is a subset of patients who relapse greater than 2 years from initial diagnosis that will become survivors. Histological response was significantly associated with time to relapse, but was not predictive of SAR.

Evaluation of appropriate follow-up after curative surgery for patients with colorectal cancer using time to recurrence and survival after recurrence: a retrospective multicenter study.

IntroductionThe follow-up schedule for colorectal cancer patients after curative surgery is inconsistent among the guidelines. Evaluation of time to recurrence (TTR) and survival after recurrence (SAR) may provide evidence for appropriate follow-up.MethodsWe assessed 3039 colon cancer (CC) and 1953 rectal cancer (RC) patients who underwent curative surgery between 2007 and 2008. We evaluated the pre- and post-recurrent clinicopathological factors associated with TTR and SAR in each stage of CC and RC.ResultsThe recurrence rates of stages I, II, and III were 1.2%, 13.1%, and 26.3%, respectively, for CC, and 8.4%, 20.0%, and 30.4%, respectively, for RC. In CC patients, high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and lymphovascular invasion were independent predictors of short TTR. In RC patients, metastatic factors (liver metastasis in stage III) and venous invasion (stage III) were independent predictors of short TTR. The prognostic factors of SAR were age (stage II CC and stage III RC), female gender (stage III RC), high CEA level (stage II RC), histological type (stage III CRC), nodal status (stage III CC), recurrence within 1 year (stage III RC), M1b recurrence (stage II CRC), local recurrence (stage II CC), and no surgical resection after recurrence (stage II and III CRC).ConclusionsThe follow-up schedule for stage I should be different from that for the other stages. We recommend that intensive follow-up is appropriate in stage III CC patients with undifferentiated adenocarcinoma or N2 nodal status, stage II RC patients with high preoperative CEA level, and stage III RC patients.

Survival analysis according to period and analysis of the factors influencing changes in survival in patients with recurrent breast cancer: a large-scale, single-center study.

We performed this study to analyze changing survival patterns regarding recurrent breast cancer in Korea during the last 16years (1993-2008). We also sought to determine factors possibly influencing outcomes and changes over time in the duration of survival after recurrence. We retrospectively analyzed 9671 patients with breast cancer treated between January 1993 and December 2008, comparing the periods 1993-2002 and 2003-2008.We retrospectively reviewed the collected database including the age at diagnosis, clinical manifestations, pathology report, surgical methods, types of adjuvant treatment modalities, type of recurrence, and follow-up period. There were 1944 cases (20.1%) of recurrence. Median age at the first recurrence was 49.5years (range 21.8-92.9). Median follow-up was 28.8months (range 0-228.0) from the time of relapse. Median survival time was 35.0months. Survival after recurrence (SAR) significantly improved in 2003-2008 compared to that in 1993-2002. Median survival time increased from 27.6months in the period I to 42.3months in period II (p = 0.001). Independent prognostic factors after the first recurrence by multivariate analysis were age at diagnosis, tumor size, nodal status, tumor grade, subtype, anti-hormonal therapy, time at diagnosis, and disease-free interval. Outcomes of breast cancer have been improving recently, and survival time after the first recurrence of breast cancer has steadily increased in recent decades. We confirmed that advances in treatments have contributed to this improvement in survival after the first recurrence.

Evaluation of outcomes over time (1998-2009) of patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX: Analysis of 7,230 patients from MOSAIC, C07, C08, N0147, AVANT, and PETACC8 trials in the ACCENT Database.

724 Background: Adjuvant FOLFOX is the standard of care for pts with stage III colon cancer and a platform to test new agents. Improvements in supportive care and development of newer treatments for metastatic disease impact the overall outcome of pts treated with adjuvant therapy. We examined the trend of disease-free survival (DFS), survival after recurrence (SAR), and overall survival (OS) of pts treated with FOLFOX over a ten-year period. Methods: Outcomes of colon cancer pts enrolled in 6 adjuvant trials receiving FOLFOX alone were analyzed. Pt enrollment period was dichotomized as old (1998 – 2003) vs. new era (2004 – 2009) based on the FDA approval date of bevacizumab. 3/5yr event-free rates were estimated by adjusted Kaplan-Meier methods. Outcomes were compared between the two eras by Cox model. To control for potential confounding effects, all analyses were adjusted for age, gender, performance score, T/N stage, tumor sidedness and histologic grade. Results: In total, 7,230 pts (stage II [n = 1122]; stage III [n = 6,108]) were identified; 32% and 68% were treated in the old and new era, respectively. Stage III pts enrolled in the new era were significantly younger, more likely to have T4/N2 disease, higher tumor grade, and left-sided tumors. After adjusting for pt characteristics, no difference in DFS was seen over time. However prolonged SAR and OS were observed in pts treated in the new era (Table). 5yr OS increased from 76% to 80% over time. Median SAR improved from 14.8 to 26.4 months. Conclusions: Stage III colon cancer pts who received adjuvant FOLFOX experienced significant improvements in SAR and OS—but not DFS—over time. In view of the improvements in OS and nearly doubled SAR, the optimal duration of OS follow-up to evaluate the benefits of adjuvant therapy (currently 5 years) should be reassessed, and ACCENT investigators are planning to conduct these additional analyses using their large pooled-trial database. [Table: see text]

Outcomes over time (1998-2009) of stage II colon cancer patients (pts) receiving adjuvant FOLFOX: Pooled analysis of 1,122 pts in the ACCENT database.

728 Background: Adjuvant FOLFOX therapy for stage II patients remains controversial, and selection criteria are imprecise. We examined the trend of disease-free survival (DFS: time to recurrence or death, whichever occurs first); time to recurrence (TTR: time to recurrence, censored at death without recurrence); survival after recurrence (SAR); and overall survival (OS) of pts treated with FOLFOX over a ten-year period. Methods: Outcomes of pts with stage II colon cancer enrolled in 6 adjuvant trials receiving FOLFOX alone were analyzed. Pt enrollment period was dichotomized as old (1998 – 2003) vs. new era (2004 – 2009) based on the FDA approval date of bevacizumab. 3/5yr event-free rates were estimated using adjusted Kaplan-Meier methods. Outcomes were compared between the two eras by multivariate Cox model. To control for potential confounding effects, all analyses were adjusted for age, gender, performance score, T stage, number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined, tumor side, and histologic grade. Results: In total, 1,122 pts with stage II were identified; 71% and 29% were treated in the old and new era, respectively. Pts enrolled in the new era were significantly younger and more likely to have higher tumor-grade and right-sided tumors compared to old era. More pts in the new era (71%) had ≥12 LNs examined compared to the old era (53%). After adjusting for potential confounding effects, no difference in DFS, TTR, SAR or OS between old and new eras was found (Table). Although median SAR increased from 13.6 to 26 months over time, this was not statistically significant, likely due to lack of power. An increased TTR over time (HRadj. 0.41, padj.= 0.002) was observed in pts with ≥12 LNs examined (3-yr TTR: 92% in old era vs. 96% in new era), but not pts with &lt;12 LNs examined (pinteraction = 0.04). Conclusions: In stage II colon cancer pts who received adjuvant FOLFOX, no significant increase of DFS or OS was observed over time. However TTR was longer only in pts with ≥12 LNs examined. [Table: see text]

Long-Term Survival of Recurrent Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: The Impact and Selection of Repeat Surgery.

Definitive guidelines for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) do not exist. This study has focused on the repeat surgery when analyzing the survival outcomes of recurrent ICC. We evaluated the relationship between clinicopathological features of the primary tumor and implementation of the repeat surgery to identify its potential selection criteria. A total of 108 patients with recurrent ICC between 1993 and 2015 were analyzed. Of these, 15 patients underwent repeat surgery and 93 did not. Seven out of 29 patients with intrahepatic recurrence and eight out of 44 patients with extrahepatic recurrence were amenable to the repeat surgery. Thirty-five patients with simultaneous or consequent intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic recurrence were not amenable to the repeat surgery. Patients who underwent repeat surgery had a lower proportion of lymph node metastases (n=0 [0%] vs. n=47 [50.5%], p<0.001), multiple tumors in the primary tumor (n=1 [6.7%] vs. n=31 [33.3%], p=0.037), or early recurrence (≤1year; n=4 [26.7%] vs. n=62 [66.7%], p=0.003). Survival after recurrence (SAR) was better in patients who underwent repeat surgery than in those who did not (median SAR time: 91.6 vs. 10.4months, and 3-year survival: 86.7 vs. 8.7%, respectively, p<0.001). Repeat surgery for recurrent ICC with an appropriate selection can be associated with prolonged survival. Regarding the feasibility, nodal status, number of tumors on the primary tumor, and time to recurrence may be considered as selection criteria.

Salvage chemotherapy with taxane and platinum for women with recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma.

To examine survival after recurrence (SAR) among women with recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma who received a taxane/platinum doublet as the first-line salvage chemotherapy. We retrospectively examined 148 women with recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma who received salvage chemotherapy within a cohort of 906 uterine carcinosarcomas. An independent association of salvage chemotherapy type and SAR was examined with multivariate analysis. There were 71 (48.0%) women who received a taxane/platinum regimen. On univariate analysis, women who received a taxane/platinum doublet had a higher 2-year SAR rate compared to women who received non-taxane/platinum regimens (55.5% versus 34.8%, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, use of taxane/platinum regimen was independently associated with improved SAR compared to the non-taxane/platinum regimens (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35 to 0.91, P=0.02). When stratified by disease-free interval, women with a disease-free interval ≥6months who received a taxane/platinum doublet had a higher 2-year SAR rate compared to those who received non-taxane/platinum regimens (61.9% versus 40.0%, HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.75, P=0.002); conversely, in women with a disease-free interval <6months, 2-year SAR rates were similar between the two groups (20.5% versus 18.4%, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.90, P=0.61). Among women who received a taxane/platinum doublet as adjuvant chemotherapy, re-treatment with taxane/platinum doublet as salvage chemotherapy remained beneficial (2-year SAR rate, 62.1% versus 39.7%, HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86, P=0.019). Our study suggests that taxane/platinum doublet may be a more effective chemotherapy regimen compared to other regimens among women with recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma, especially for those who had a disease-free interval of ≥6months.

Clear cell carcinomas of the ovary have poorer outcomes compared with serous carcinomas: Results from a single-center Taiwanese study

To compare the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with ovarian clear cell carcinomas (CCCs) and serous carcinomas (SCs). We retrieved the clinical records of women with epithelial ovarian cancer (Stage I-IV) who received primary surgeries between 2000 and 2013. Cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival, and survival after recurrence (SAR) of CCC and SC patients were retrospectively compared. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of survival. Of 891 women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer, 169 CCCs and 351 high-grade SCs were analyzed. The 5-year CSS rates of CCC patients were significantly lower than those of SC for both Stage III (22.3% vs. 47.3%, p=0.001) and Stage IV (0% vs. 24.4%, p=0.001) disease. In the absence of gross residual malignancies, the 5-year CSS rate was better for CCC (82.3%) than SC (75.2%, p=0.010). The 5-year SAR rate was significantly lower for CCC than SC (14.3% vs. 24.4%, p=0.002). Old age and residual malignancies were independent prognostic factors for CSS in the entire cohort of CCC patients. In the subgroup of Stage I CCC, positive cytology was identified as the only adverse prognostic factor for CSS. The clinical outcomes of CCC are generally poorer than SC. Complete cytoreduction to no gross residual disease should be ideally achieved in CCC patients. A greater understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of CCC may lead to tailored therapies, ultimately optimizing outcomes.