We read Dr Poullis’s letter addressing our article with great interest [1]. Firstly, we would like to clarify that our article was not meant to be a head-to-head comparison with the patients in the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial. Our patients were significantly younger than the Western population comprising the STICH trial. This is due to the incidence of coronary artery disease at a younger age in the Indian population, due to various ethnic predisposing factors. Our patients mostly had single-vessel disease involving the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery (LAD), although some had two- and three-vessel disease. Those patients with multivessel disease received multiple grafts. The pathophysiology of left ventricular aneurysm has been seen in predominantly single coronary artery territory involvement [2], which may often be recanalized and therefore not requiring revascularization, with only resection of scar tissue and reshaping of the contractile myocardium providing adequate clinical benefit. The immediate and 30-day postoperative functional class has been mentioned in the table. The re-hospitalization for heart failure occurred at 9.2 1.2 months following surgery. The reasons for this were multi-factorial and related to associated pulmonary hypertension and renal dysfunction, and not to the surgical technique per se. Postoperatively, all patients were on maximally tolerated doses of beta-blockers, ace inhibitors, statins, aspirin, and diuretics. The dosages of diuretics and ace inhibitors, however, decreased significantly following surgery. We had centerline analysis of contrast ventriculography of all our patients before and after surgery. All our patients had discrete areas of dyskinesis/akinesis at baseline conforming to the definition of left ventricular aneurysm. Following surgery, there was a significant decrease in hypokinetic chords from 61.1 12.8 to 36.5 14.8 ( p < 0.001) [3]. This was in the anterior and anterolateral segments in anterior aneurysms and in the inferior and inferbasal segments of the inferior aneurysms. There was also a significant decrease in akinetic/dyskinetic chords from 32.5 11 at baseline to 25 8.1 following surgery ( p < 0.001). Here, the akinetic/ dyskinetic chords in the postoperative ventricle conformed to the intracavitary patch which remained akinetic. We agree with Dr Poullis that the success of surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) depends on the presence of discrete areas of akinesis/dyskinesis, conforming to scar tissue and definite areas of contractile myocardium. For patients with diffusely hypokinetic ventricles, the only option would be cardiac transplantation, if eligible. This has been adequately described in our article [4]. Our study follows Pocar et al. [5] in validating the surgical techniques resulting in a more ellipsoid ventricular geometry. Our left ventricular shape analysis also proved significantly better alignment of the contractile myocardial fibers in the anterior wall, which was not seen with endoventricular circular patch plasty [6]. In our patients, despite a postoperative decrease in left ventricular stroke volume, there was a significant clinical improvement as assessed by functional class, which cannot be attributed to decreased contractility. This has also been proved by our centerline analysis and shape analysis. The heart rate did not change significantly following surgery (baseline heart rate (HR): 84 3 beats per minute (BPM) to postoperative HR: 81 4 BPM). The phenomenon of decreasing stroke volume following SVR will be the subject of future study.
Read full abstract