Surgical Treatment Of Esophageal Cancer Research Articles

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer-New technologies, modern concepts

Das Ösophaguskarzinom wird in Deutschland meist in spezialisierten Zentren entsprechend den Leitlinien multimodal und interdisziplinär therapiert. In den kommenden Jahren wird die Zentralisierung der Ösophaguschirurgie in Deutschland durch die Festlegung neuer Mindestmengen weiter voranschreiten. Dieser Artikel soll neue Technologien für die chirurgische Therapie des Ösophaguskarzinoms und zudem aktuelle onkologische Konzepte aus der Sicht eines High-volume-Centers vorstellen.

342 SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER WITH VARIATIONS OF THE AORTIC ARCH AND ITS BRANCHES

Abstract The variations of the aortic arch and its branches are rare. The surgical treatment of esophageal cancer would be challenged for combination with this anomaly. This study intends to review significant group cases to analyze the influence of this variation on esophagectomy. Methods From 2013 to 2019, 19 patients with aortic arch and brachiocephalic vessels variations underwent esophagectomy, accounting for 0.3% during the same period. The abnormalities were distributed as follows: left-sided aortic arch combined with aberrant right subclavian artery (LAA + ARSA) occurred 13 cases, right-sided aortic arch anomalies with mirror image arch branches (RAA + MIAB) in 1 case, and right-sided aortic arch combined with aberrant left subclavian artery (RAA + ALSA) in 5 case. Of the patients with LAA + ARSA, 11 patients underwent the McKeown esophagectomy, and 2 patients via transhiatal. All patients with RAA underwent left thoracotomy approach.Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival were analyzed. Results The tumors were mostly located in the upper and middle thorax (47.4% and 42.1%). The R0 resection rate was 89.5% (17/19). Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury occurred in 2 patients, anastomotic fistula in 1 patient. Two patients died within 30 days postoperatively. The yield of lymph nodes was 21.8 ± 9.4. The sampling rate of lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve was 61.5% in LAA + ARSA group, while 16.7% in RAA group. Recurrence happened in 5 cases (29.4%), including 2 regional relapse. Four patients died after recurrence, with a median time to death of 20 months (range: 10–48 months). Conclusion For aortic arch and brachiocephalic artery variations in esophageal cancer, aberrant right subclavian artery and right-sided aortic arch are the most common types. The surgical strategy is closely related to the aortic arch position. Due to the combined variation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the upper mediastinal lymph nodes dissection would be conservative, but with acceptable oncologic results.

777 IS ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER WITH RESIDUAL DISEASE AFTER TRIMODALITY THERAPY FUTILE? A NATIONWIDE MULTICENTRIC SURVEY

Abstract For patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC), trimodality therapy associating neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery is the standard of care. However, the risk of recurrence for patients with residual disease (RD) remains high and there is no established adjuvant treatment modality in this setting. Adjuvant immunotherapy recently exhibited promising results but ACT could also play a beneficial role. This study evaluated the potential benefit of ACT in RD after trimodality therapy for EC. Methods A multicenter database for the surgical treatment of EC collected data from 30 university hospitals (2000–2010). Patients with RD in completely resected EC after trimodality therapy where included and separated in an ACT group and a non-ACT group. Demographics, tumor and treatment characteristics, morbidity, overall and recurrence-free survival (OS and RFS) where compared. Uni and multivariate analysis were performed to identify factors associated with OS. Survival analysis of patients treated with and without ACT was performed in a propensity score matched study. Results From 2944 patients included, 484 had RD after trimodality therapy, and 9.3% (n = 45) were treated with ACT. There were no major differences in demographics, preoperative tumor and treatment characteristics between groups. Major complications where higher in the non-ACT group (31 vs 20%, p = 0.018). ACT group had more nodal involvement (78 vs 45%, p < 0.001). OS and RFS were significantly worse in the ACT group (median: 36.0 vs 46.7mo, p < 0.001 and 25.5 vs 47.9mo, p = 0.029 respectively). After multivariate analysis, ACT was independently associated with worse OS (HR = 3.69, p < 0.001). In the propensity matched study, OS and RFS remained worse in ACT group. Conclusion This study supports current recommendations concerning ACT abstention in EC with RD after trimodality therapy. In light of the promising results of the BMS Checkmate 577 study, adjuvant immunotherapy in this setting should therefore be considered as the first choice of treatment.

Thirty years of esophageal cancer surgery in Oulu University Hospital.

BackgroundEsophagectomy is the mainstay of surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, but involves high operative risk. The aim of this study was to review the evolution surgical treatment of esophageal cancer in Northern Finland, with introduction of minimally invasive techniques.MethodsAll elective esophagectomies performed in Oulu University Hospital between years 1987 and 2020 were included. Treatment strategies were compared to current guidelines including staging and use of neoadjuvant therapy, and benchmark values including postoperative morbidity, hospital stay, readmissions and 90-day mortality. Long-term survival was compared to previous national studies.ResultsBetween years 1987 and 2020 a total of 341 underwent an esophagectomy. Transhiatal resection was performed to 167 (49.3%), Ivor Lewis to 129 (38.1%) and McKeown to 42 (12.4%) patients. MIE was performed to 49 (14.5%) patients. During the past four years 83.7% of locally advanced diseases received neoadjuvant treatment. Since 1987, gradual improvements have occurred especially in incidence of pleural effusion requiring additional drainage procedure (highest in 2011–2013 and in last four years 14.0%), recurrent nerve injuries (highest in 2008–2010 29.4% and lowest in 2017–2020 1.8%) and in 1-year survival rate (1987–1998 68.4% vs. 2017–2020 82.1%). No major changes in comorbidity, complication rate, anastomosis leaks, hospital stay or postoperative mortality were seen.ConclusionsEsophageal cancer surgery has gone through major changes over three decades. Current guideline-based treatment has resulted with progressive improvement in mid- and long-term survival. However, despite modern protocol, no major improvement has occurred for example in major complications, anastomosis leak rates or hospital stay.

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients with high-risk post-operative complications.

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer is challenging, due to considerable morbidity, especially in high surgical risk patients. While transhiatal esophagectomy leads to good oncological outcomes and reduced postoperative complications, less invasive techniques might further improve outcomes. Our goal was to compare results of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) with open transhiatal esophagectomy (OTE) in esophageal cancer patients at high surgical risk. From 2014 to 2020, 128 patients were identified. Seventy received OTE while 51 received LTE. After propensity score matching (1:1), postoperative complications, analysis of overall and disease-free survival, and survival-related prognostic factors were assessed in two groups of 48 patients. Ninety-one (77%) patients were men with a mean age of 65 ± 10.3 years. Those who underwent OTE experienced more clinical and surgical complications. In LTE patients, the number of mean resected lymph nodes was 25.9, and in patients who had OTE, it was 17.4 (P < 0.001). Overall survival was 56.0% in the LTE group and 33.6% (P = 0.023) in the OTE group. In multivariable analysis of overall survival, open surgery and incomplete pathological response were seen as worse negative factors. In multivariable analysis, metastatic lymph nodes, incomplete pathologic response, surgical complications, and a Charlson's index > 2 (P = 0.014) were associated with poor prognosis. Both surgical methods are safe with similar morbidity and mortality; however, LTE was associated with fewer complications, a higher number of resected lymph nodes, better overall survival, and more prognostic factors related to global and disease-free overall survival in high-risk patients.

Long-term variation in skeletal muscle and adiposity in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

SummaryThis study seeks to define long-term variation in body composition in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer and to associate those changes with survival. Assessment of skeletal muscle, visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) was performed using computed tomography (CT) images routinely acquired: at diagnosis; after neoadjuvant therapy, and; >6 months after esophagectomy. In cases where multiple CT scans were performed >6 months after surgery, all available images were assessed. Ninty-seven patients met inclusion criteria with a median of 2 (range 1–10) postoperative CT images acquired between 0.5 and 9.7 years after surgery. Following surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, patients lost on average 13.3% of their skeletal muscle, 64.5% of their VAT and 44.2% of their SAT. Sarcopenia at diagnosis was not associated with worse overall survival (66.3% vs. 68.5%; P = 0.331). Sarcopenia 1 year after esophagectomy was however associated with lower 5-year overall survival (53.8% vs. 87.5%; P = 0.019). Survival was lower in those patients who had >10% decrease in skeletal muscle index (SMI; 33.3% vs. 72.1%; P = 0.003) and >40% decrease in SAT 1 year after surgery (40.4% vs. 67.4%; P = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, a decline in SMI 1 year after surgery was predictive of worse survival (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.20–0.73; P = 0.004). This study provides new insight relating to long-term variation in body composition in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. Findings provide further evidence of the importance of body composition, in particular depletion of skeletal muscle, in predicting survival following esophagectomy.

Is the routine placement of a feeding jejunostomy during esophagectomy worthwhile?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Malnutrition dramatically increases the risk of postoperative complications and delays patient recovery. Therefore, a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) is routinely placed during esophagectomy to maintain the postoperative nutrition supply. However, recently published studies have questioned the need of a FJT in every esophageal cancer patient. Because most patients can resume oral intake shortly after surgery, the nutrition-providing function of a FJT becomes much less critical. In contrast, FJT-related complications could be severe. Relevant publications were found out by systemic searching of four medical databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials). By reading the titles and the abstracts, potentially relevant studies were screened from the search results. The incidence of postoperative complications and FJT-related complications were calculated and compared to evaluate the efficacy of a FJT. Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The no-FJT group had a similar or even lower incidence of postoperative complications [anastomotic leakage (AL), pulmonary complications, and wound infections] compared with the FJT group. Ileus and FJT site infections were the most common FJT-related complications. The incidence of ileus was approximately 6% (95% CI: 3-12%), and over 63% of the patients with an ileus required re-operation to relieve the obstruction. The pooled mean rate of FJT site infections was 7% (95% CI: 6-9%). Approximately 7% of patients had dysfunction (obstruction or dislocation) of the jejunostomy tube (95% CI: 3-14%). The non-selective placement of a FJT during esophagectomy provides few benefits to the patients and may even increase the risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, an intraoperative FJT should be selectively prescribed, but not routinely in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

From McKeown to Ivor Lewis, the learning curve for thoracic lymphadenectomy over the first 100 robotic esophagectomy cases: a retrospective study.

BackgroundLymphadenectomy is an essential but challenging part of the surgical treatment for esophageal cancer. However, the previously reported learning curve for robotic esophagectomy primarily focused on only one surgical approach (McKeown or Ivor Lewis). However, both approaches must be mastered by a mature robotic surgical team to deal with different clinical conditions and satisfy patients’ needs. This study aimed to show how an experienced esophageal surgical team became proficient in both McKeown and Ivor Lewis robotic esophagectomy.MethodsA retrospective review of the first 100 cases of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) by a single surgical team was performed. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to distinguish the change point during the learning course. A subgroup analysis was performed according to a surgical approach (McKeown or Ivor Lewis) to determine the effect of experience from one surgical approach on learning the other RAMIE technique.ResultsAccording to the tendency of the CUSUM plot, the learning curve was divided into four phases. The subgroup analysis indicated the decline of the CUSUM plot in the 3rd phase originated from the start of the Ivor Lewis approach. The attending surgeon took 23 cases to achieve a significant improvement in the number of harvested thoracic lymph nodes using the McKeown approach. Regardless of the acquired experience of McKeown RAMIE, it took another 18 cases for the surgical team to achieve significant improvement in harvesting thoracic lymph nodes using the Ivor Lewis approach.ConclusionsTwenty-three cases were needed for an experienced surgical team to improve thoracic lymphadenectomy results using McKeown RAMIE. There was another learning phase during the transition from McKeown to Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Importantly, the acquired experience from performing McKeown RAMIE could shorten how long it takes to learn Ivor Lewis RAMIE.

Outcomes of curative esophageal cancer surgery in elderly: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUNDAn increasing number of older patients is undergoing curative, surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Previous meta-analyses have shown that older patients suffered from more postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients, which may lead to patient selection based on age. However, only studies including patients that underwent open esophagectomy were included. Therefore, it remains unknown whether there is an association between age and outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy.AIMTo perform a systematic review on age and postoperative outcome in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.METHODSStudies comparing older with younger patients with primary esophageal cancer undergoing curative esophagectomy were included. Meta-analysis of studies using a 75-year age threshold are presented in the manuscript, studies using other age thresholds in the Supplementary material. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between 1995 and 2020. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak, pulmonary and cardiac complications, delirium, 30- and 90-d, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included pneumonia and 5-year overall survival.RESULTSSeven studies (4847 patients) using an age threshold of 75 years were included for meta-analysis with 755 older and 4092 younger patients. Older patients (9.05%) had higher rates of 90-d mortality compared with younger patients (3.92%), (confidence interval = 1.10-5.56). In addition, older patients (9.45%) had higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared with younger patients (3.68%), (confidence interval = 1.01-5.91). In the subgroup of 2 studies with minimally invasive esophagectomy, older and younger patients had comparable 30-d, 90-d and in-hospital mortality rates. CONCLUSIONOlder patients undergoing curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have a higher postoperative mortality risk. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may be important for minimizing mortality in older patients.

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer with anomaly of the aortic arch and its branches.

Anomalies of the aortic arch and its branches rarely develop. The surgery for esophageal cancer may be challenging with the presence of these anomalies. This study is aimed to analyze the influence of these variations during the esophagectomy. A total of 21 patients with aortic arch and brachiocephalic vessel variations were retrospectively identified from 2013 to 2019. Anomalies were distributed: 15 patients with left-sided aortic arch combined with aberrant right subclavian artery (LAA + ARSA), 2 right-sided aortic arch with mirror-image arch branches (RAA + MIAB), and 4 right-sided aortic arch combined with aberrant left subclavian artery (RAA + ALSA). Perioperative characteristics and long-term survival were analyzed. Tumors were mostly located in the upper and middle thorax (42.9% and 47.6%, respectively). Of the 15 patients with LAA + ARSA, 13 underwent McKeown esophagectomy and 2 via transhiatal approach. Left thoracotomy was performed on all 6 patients with RAA. The R0 resection rate was 90.5% (19/21). Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury occurred in 2 patients. Two patients died within 30days postoperatively. Lymph node yield was 23.6 ± 1.2, with a metastasis rate of 38.1% (8/21). The median follow-up time was 18months. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients (11-35months) and 4 patients died after recurrence with a median time to death of 21months (8-47months). For resectable esophageal cancer combined with aortic arch and its branches anomalies, satisfactory surgical results can be obtained under careful preoperative evaluation and reasonable surgical approach selection.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy via Sweet approach in combination with cervical mediastinoscopy is a valuable approach for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

To compare the short-, mid-, and long-term outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer between minimally invasive esophagectomy via Sweet approach in combination with cervical mediastinoscopy (MIE-SM) and minimally invasive esophagectomy via McKeown approach (MIE-MC), and to evaluate the value of MIE-SM in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. A prospective, nonrandomized study was adopted. A total of 65 esophageal cancer patients after MIE-SM and MIE-MC from June 2014 to May 2016 were included. Among them, 33 patients underwent MIE-SM and 32 patients underwent MIE-MC. Short-term outcomes (including the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss volume, ICU stay time, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, reoperation, open surgery, number of dissected lymph nodes, and 30-day mortality), mid-term outcomes, [including Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the esophageal site-specific module (QLQ-OES18)], long-term outcomes [including overall survival and disease-free survival] were compared between the 2 groups. Radical resection (R0) were achieved in all patients. There were no significant differences in the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss volume, ICU stay time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). More lymph nodes were dissected in the MIE-SM group (24.1±7.3) than those in the MIE-MC group (17.8±5.0, P<0.001). The emotional function, global health status scale scores in QLQ-C30 scale in the MIE-SM group were significantly higher than those in the MIE-MC group (P=0.025, P<0.001, respectively), and the pain score in the MIE-SM group was significantly lower than that in the MIE-MC group (P=0.013). QLQ-OES18 results showed that the pain score in the MIE-SM group was significantly lower than that in the MIE-MC group (P=0.021). Survival analysis showed that the overall survival and disease-free survival were similar between the 2 groups. MIE-SM appears to be a safe surgical approach, which may get better quality of life, suffer less pain, and can achieve the same therapeutic effect as MIE-MC. Therefore, MIE-SM should be considered as a valuable approach for the treatment of middle and lower esophageal cancer.

Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared to Open Esophagectomy.

To examine 5-year survival in esophageal cancer after MIE compared to OE. MIE is becoming an increasingly common approach in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. A recent meta-analysis suggested 18% lower 5-year all-cause mortality after MIE compared to OE, but the quality of the included studies was limited. Population-based cohort study including almost all patients who underwent elective esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in Sweden or Finland in 2010 to 2016, with follow-up until end of 2019. Cox regression was used to provide hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all-cause 5-year mortality (main outcome) after MIE (hybrid or total) versus OE. Adjustments were made for age, sex, comorbidity, pathological tumor stage, histological tumor type, neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, country, and annual hospital volume of esophagectomy. Among all 1264 patients, 470 (37.2%) underwent MIE and 794 (62.8%) underwent OE. MIE was associated with an 18% decreased risk of all-cause 5-year mortality, compared to OE [adjusted HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67- 1.00 ( P = 0.048)]. The HR of all-cause 5-year mortality was seemingly lower after total MIE compared to OE (adjusted HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.98) than after hybrid MIE compared to OE (adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68-1.11). This bi-national study indicates that MIE is associated with a higher 5-year survival than OE in patients with esophageal cancer, and that the survival benefit is greater after total MIE than hybrid MIE.

A standardized approach for the thoracic dissection in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly being adopted as the preferred surgical treatment for esophageal cancer, as it is superior to open esophagectomy and a good alternative to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy. This paper addresses the technical details of the thoracoscopic phase of RAMIE, including the operating room set-up, patient positioning, port placement, and surgical steps.

Robotic resection for esophageal cancer

Summary Background In the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, complete tumor resection is the most important factor and determines long-term survival. With an increase in robotic expertise in other fields of surgery, robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was born. Currently, there is a lack of convincing data on the extent of expected benefits (perioperative and oncologic outcomes and/or quality of life). Some evidence exists that patients’ overall quality of life and physical function improves, with less fatigue and pain 3 months after surgery. We aimed to review the available literature regarding robotic esophagectomy, compare perioperative, oncologic, and quality of life outcomes with open and minimally invasive approaches, and give a brief overview of our standardized four-arm RAMIE technique and explore future directions. Methods A Medline (PubMed) search was conducted including the following key words: esophagectomy, minimally invasive esophagectomy, robotic esophagectomy, Ivor Lewis and McKeown. We present the history, different techniques used, outcomes, and the standardization of robotic esophagectomy. Results Robotic esophagectomy offers a steeper learning curve with fewer complications but comparable oncological results compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy. Conclusions Available studies suggest that RAMIE is associated with benefits regarding length of stay, clinical outcomes, and quality of life—if patients are treated in an experienced center with a standardized technique for robotic esophagectomy—making it a potentially beneficial tool in the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, center-wide standardization and prospective data collection will be a necessity to prove superiority of robotic esophagectomy.

Evolution of Esophagectomy for Cancer Over 30 Years: Changes in Presentation, Management and Outcomes

BackgroundEsophageal cancer has seen a considerable change in management and outcomes over the last 30 years. Historically, the overall prognosis has been regarded as poor; however, the use of multimodal treatment and the integration of enhanced recovery pathways have improved short- and long-term outcomes.Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the changing trends in presentation, management, and outcomes for patients undergoing surgical treatment for esophageal cancer over 30 years from a single-center, high-volume unit in the UK.Patients and MethodsData from consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer (adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma) between 1989 and 2018 from a single-center, high-volume unit were reviewed. Presentation method, management strategies, and outcomes were evaluated. Patients were grouped into successive 5-year cohorts for comparison and evaluation of changing trends.Results Between 1989 and 2018, 1486 patients underwent esophagectomy for cancer. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59–71) and 1105 (75%) patients were male. Adenocarcinoma constituted 1105 (75%) patients, and overall median survival was 29 months (IQR 15–68). Patient presentation changed, with epigastric discomfort now the most common presentation (70%). An improvement in mortality from 5 to 2% (p < 0.001) was seen over the time period, and overall survival improved from 22 to 56 months (p < 0.001); however, morbidity increased from 54 to 68% (p = 0.004).ConclusionsLong-term outcomes have significantly improved over the 30-year study period. In addition, mortality and length of stay have improved despite an increase in complications. The reasons for this are multifactorial and include the use of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy, the introduction of an enhanced recovery pathway, and improved patient selection.

Impact of co-morbidities on health-related quality of life 10 years after surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer

BackgroundOesophagectomy for cancer is associated with long‐term decreased health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of co‐morbidities on HRQoL among survivors of oesophageal or gastro‐oesophageal junctional cancers after 10 years or more.MethodsThe study included a prospectively collected, population‐based cohort, comprising all patients who had surgery for oesophageal or gastro‐oesophageal junctional cancer in Sweden in 2001–2005 with follow‐up until 31 December 2016. All data regarding patient and tumour characteristics, treatment details and HRQoL were collected using a prospectively created database. Multivariable ANCOVA regression models, adjusting for age, sex, tumour histology, stage and surgical technique, were used to calculate adjusted mean scores with 95 per cent confidence intervals for all HRQoL outcomes.ResultsA total of 92 survivors (88·5 per cent) responded to the questionnaires. Patients were stratified in two groups according to whether they reported a low or high impact of co‐morbidities on general health. Patients in the high‐impact group had clinically significantly decreased HRQoL and an increased level of symptoms, but differences between these two groups were not statistically significant.ConclusionCo‐morbidities with high impact on general health still contribute to impaired HRQoL 10 years after oesophagectomy for cancer.

Fixed in the neck or pushed back into the thorax?-Impact of cervical anastomosis position on anastomosis healing.

BackgroundCervical anastomotic leakage remains a great challenge for thoracic surgeons in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Among the factors affecting cervical anastomosis healing, the surgical technique is the key controllable element. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of cervical anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy, especially those controllable surgical factors.MethodsA retrospective review of patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy in the past eight years in West China Hospital was performed. Patients with cervical anastomotic leakage were assigned to leakage group (LG) while the left was enrolled in the none-leakage group (NLG). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors of anastomotic leakage.ResultsA total of 518 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. In the baseline comparison, the difference in fixation of anastomosis in the neck, anastomosis mode, diabetes, and hypertension between the LG and NLG reached statistically significant. Moreover, the statistical difference of cervical fixation, anastomosis mode, and hypertension remained significant in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.ConclusionsThe cervical anastomosis fixation, anastomosis mode, and hypertension are independent risk factors of gastroesophageal cervical anastomotic leakage.

Surgical treatment for esophageal cancer during the outbreak of COVID-19

Since December 2019, unexplained pneumonia has appeared in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, and a new type of coronavirus infection was confirmed as COVID-19. COVID-19 spread rapidly nationwide and abroad. The COVID-19 has brought huge impacts to all the people and walks of life, especially to the medical and health systems. It has also brought great challenges to the treatment of patients with cancer. Esophageal cancer is a common malignant tumor in China and most of the patients are in the middle and advanced stage when diagnosed, with immunosuppressive and poor prognosis. The selection of surgical procedures and perioperative managements of esophageal cancer require all thoracic surgeons work together to figure out a reasonable system of surgical treatment and emergency response.

Advances in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer since 1965.

In Japan, the treatment of esophageal cancer has undergone significant development since the Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases was established in 1965 by Doctors Komei Nakayama, Shigetsugu Katsura, and Ichiro Akakura. When the Society was established, surgery was the first‐line treatment for esophageal cancer. Since then, the Society has been led by three successive chairpersons—Doctors Katsura, Nakayama, and Satoh. Over this time, surgery‐related mortalities declined to 5%‐6% because of the rapid improvements in surgical technique. Beginning in 1980, the bilateral cervical lymph node dissection technique gained attention, and favorable long‐term outcomes were gradually reported. A nationwide questionnaire survey, conducted by the Society in 1990, showed that more favorable long‐term outcomes were achieved by following the three‐field lymph node dissection technique than by following the two‐field lymph node dissection technique. Since then, the three‐field lymph node dissection technique has been recognized and widely used as the standard surgical procedure for treating esophageal cancer. After clinical studies examined the utility of various pre‐ and postoperative adjunctive therapies in outcome improvements, preoperative chemotherapy was recognized as the standard treatment in the therapy guidelines. Additionally, less invasive surgical methods have been developed, including endoscopic and robot‐assisted surgeries, which are applied in general practice now. However, unresectable and recurrent esophageal cancers remain difficult to treat, and additional treatments should be developed.

Epidemiological characteristic and current status of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer by analysis of national registry database

Objective: To investigate the epidemiological characteristics and current status of surgical management for esophageal cancer in China. Methods: A national database was setup through a network platform. The clinical data of esophageal cancer treated by surgery was collected from 70 major hospitals in China between January 2009 and December 2014. Results: Complete data of 8 181 cases of esophageal cancer patients who underwent surgery were recorded in the database and recruited in the analysis. Among them, 6 052 cases were male and 2 129 were female, the average age was 60.5 years.The epidemiological investigation results showed that 148 cases (1.8%) had history of psychological trauma, 7 527 cases (92.0%) were lower social economic status, 5 072 cases (62.0%) were short of fresh vegetables and fruits, 6 544 cases (80.0%) ate rough food frequently, 3 722 cases (45.5%) drank untreated water directly from lake or river or shallow well, 3 436 cases (42.0%) had a unhealthy eating habit, including habits of eating food fast (507 cases, 6.2%), eating hot food or drinking hot tea/soup (998 cases, 12.2%), eating fried food (1 939 cases, 23.7%), 4 410 cases (53.9%) had the habits of smoking cigarettes and 2 822 cases (34.5%) drank white wine frequently.The pathological results showed that 7 813 cases (95.5%) were squamous cell carcinoma, 267 cases were adenocarcinoma (3.3%), 25 cases were adenosquamous cell carcinoma (0.3%) and 50 cases were small cell carcinoma (0.6%). A total of 1 800 cases (22.0%) received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy due to locally advanced disease or difficulty of resection. The esophagectomies were performed through left thoracotomy approach in 5 870 cases (71.8%), through right chest approach in 2 215 cases (27.1%), and the remain 96 cases (1.2%) received surgery though other approaches.A total of 8 001 cases (97.8%) underwent radical resection, the other 180 cases (2.2%) received palliative resection. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 0.5%, the overall ≥ grade Ⅱ postoperative complication rate was 11.6% (951 cases). The 1-yr, 3-yr, and 5-yr overall actual survival rates were 82.6%, 61.6%, and 52.9%, respectively. Conclusions: The data analysis of the national database for esophageal cancer shows that bad eating habits or eating rough food without enough nutrients, lower social and economic status, drinking white wine and smoking cigarettes frequently may be correlated with tumorigenesis of esophageal cancer. However, strong evidences produced by prospective observation studies are needed. Overall, the long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients has been improved gradually due to the application of advanced surgical techniques and reasonable multimodality treatment.