Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become a popular alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now considered the gold standard of therapy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and chronic cholecystitis. However no denitive data on its use in AC has been published. To Objective: compare the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with those of open cholecystectomy (OC) in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Materials and Methodology: A prospective study was conducted among 30 patients who have taken surgical treatment for acute cholecystitis by taking their prior consents at Surgery Department, Career Institute OF Medical Sciences, Lucknow for 1 year. The patients underwent surgery within 72 hours of the onset of symptoms. The pa tients were selected for LC or OC depending on the surgeon's experience in laparoscopic surgery. Operating time, rate of con- version from LC to OC, complications, and length of hos pital stay were the main outcomes which were noted in both procedures. Conversion from LC to OC was necessary in 15% of the patients. The Results: mean operating time was 77 minutes for the OC group and 88 minutes for the LC group (P<.001). Complications occurred in 14% of the patients in the LC group and in 23% of the patients in the OC group, with no signicant differences between the 2 groups (P=.06). The number of moderate or severe com- plications was similar in both groups, whereas mild com- plications were more common in the OC group (P<.02). The length of the hospital stay averaged 8.1 days for the OC group and 3.3 days for the LC group (P<.001). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a s Conclusions: afe, valid alternative to OC in patients with acute cholecystitis. The technique has a low rate of complications, implies a shorter hospital stay, and offers the patient a more comfortable postoperative period than OC
Read full abstract