No AccessJournal of UrologyOpposing Views1 Mar 2010Robotic Prostatectomy Jeffrey A. Cadeddu, Gagan Gautam, and Arieh L. Shalhav Jeffrey A. CadedduJeffrey A. Cadeddu Department of Urology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas More articles by this author , Gagan GautamGagan Gautam Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois More articles by this author , and Arieh L. ShalhavArieh L. Shalhav Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.065AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1 : Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol2009; 55: 1037. Google Scholar 2 : The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol2004; 172: 1431. Link, Google Scholar 3 : The effect of the approach to radical prostatectomy on the profitability of hospitals and surgeons. BJU Int2009; . Epub ahead of print. Google Scholar 4 : Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve?. Urology2005; 66: 105. Google Scholar 5 : Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA. BJU Int2007; 99: 339. Google Scholar 6 : The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology2008; 72: 1068. Google Scholar 7 : Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol2008; 26: 2278. Google Scholar 8 : Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA2009; 302: 1557. Google Scholar 9 : Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol2008; 54: 785. Google Scholar 10 : Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol2003; 170: 1738. Link, Google Scholar 11 : Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol2009; 27: 599. Google Scholar 12 : A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int2003; 92: 205. Google Scholar 13 : Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology2009; 74: 619. Google Scholar 14 : Authors' reply to editorial comment. Urology2009; 74: 624. Google Scholar © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 3March 2010Page: 858-861 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jeffrey A. Cadeddu Department of Urology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas More articles by this author Gagan Gautam Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois More articles by this author Arieh L. Shalhav Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...