Time Of Surgical Procedure Research Articles

A prospective, multicenter trial of a long-term bioabsorbable mesh with Sepra technology in cohort of challenging laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repairs (ATLAS trial)

BackgroundThis prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study evaluated P4HB-ST mesh in laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) in patients with Class I (clean) wounds at high risk for Surgical Site Occurrence (SSO). MethodsPrimary endpoint was SSO requiring intervention <45 days. Secondary endpoints included: surgical procedure time, length of stay, SSO >45 days, hernia recurrence, device-related adverse events, reoperation, and Quality of Life at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24-months. Results120 patients (52.5% male), mean age of 55.0 ± 14.9 years, and BMI of 33.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2 received P4HB-ST mesh. Patient-reported comorbid conditions included: obesity (86.7%), active smoker (45.0%), COPD (5.0%), diabetes (16.7%), immunosuppression (2.5%), coronary artery disease (7.5%), chronic corticosteroid use (2.5%), hypoalbuminemia (0.8%), advanced age (10.0%), and renal insufficiency (0.8%). Hernia types were primary ventral (44.2%), primary incisional (37.5%), recurrent ventral (5.8%), and recurrent incisional (12.5%). Patients underwent LVIHR in laparoscopic (55.8%) or robotic-assisted cases (44.2%), mean defect size 15.7 ± 28.3 cm2, mean procedure time 85.9 ± 43.0 min, and mean length of stay 1.0 ± 1.4 days. There were no SSOs requiring intervention beyond 45 days, n = 38 (31.7%) recurrences, n = 22 (18.3%) reoperations, and n = 2 (1.7%) device-related adverse events (excluding recurrence). ConclusionP4HB-ST mesh demonstrated low rates of SSO and device-related complications, with improved quality of life scores, and reoperation rate comparable to other published studies. Recurrence rate was higher than expected at 31.7%. However, when analyzed by hernia defect size, recurrence was disproportionately high in defects ≥7.1 cm2 (43.3%) compared to defects <7.1 cm2 (18.6%). Thus, in LVIHR, P4HB-ST may be better suited for small defects. Caution is warranted when utilizing P4HB-ST in laparoscopic IPOM repair of larger defects until additional studies can further investigate outcomes.

Development and Evaluation of the Pediatric Readiness for Discharge (P-REDI) Tool

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the P-REDI discharge tool for safe discharge to home following ambulatory surgery. DesignA quasi-experimental, mixed methods with pre/post nurse surveys and retrospective chart review comparing pre-, interim- and post-implementation of P-REDI on unscheduled clinic visits, Emergency Department visits, hospital readmission, and length of stay. MethodsThe P-REDI tool was developed in collaboration with anesthesia and based upon an extensive review of the literature on safe discharge from the Phase II Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Nurse surveys and patient data extracted from the electronic health record through the computer-assisted reporting system were analyzed using descriptive statistics, bivariate statistics, and correlations to assess outcomes and relationships between variables. FindingsNurses’ perceptions of discharge criteria improved after implementation of P-REDI. There were no differences in adverse events before, during, and after the implementation of the P-REDI instrument. There was a significant decrease in Phase II time after implementation of the tool. There were also significant correlations with the P-REDI score and related variables such as length of surgical procedure time and length of stay. ConclusionsThe P-REDI tool was developed to provide nurses a concrete, objective tool to increase their level of comfort with discharging patients from the Phase II PACU. The tool significantly decreased length of stay in Phase II without any change in adverse events. The cost savings to the institution needs to be examined in future studies.

Military Surgical Team Performance: The Impact of Familiarity, Team Size, and Nurse Anesthesia Students

PurposeTo examine the key factors impacting surgical team performance in a military medical center. DesignA retrospective, exploratory, cross-sectional design. MethodsWe reviewed 751 orthopedic surgical cases to determine the association of surgical team familiarity, surgical complexity, team size, and the presence of student registered nurse anesthetists (SRNAs) with the surgical performance measures of total operative time, turnover time, and on-time surgical start. FindingsWe found increases in surgical team familiarity significantly reduced turnover time by 7.84% (1-0.9216 = 0.0784; P = .0260) after controlling for surgical complexity and the presence of an SRNA on the team. Familiarity did not significantly impact total operative time or the odds of a first case on-time start. With a significant interaction of surgical complexity and team size on total operative time, the surgical complexity marginal effect (at the mean of team size) showed that a one-point increase prolonged total operative time by 6.89% (P < .0001), after controlling for team familiarity and an SRNA. The team size marginal effect (at the mean of surgical complexity) showed that adding one member to the surgical team prolonged total operative time by 6.45% (P < .0001), after controlling for team familiarity and an SRNA. Higher surgical complexity not only increased turnover time by 1.46% (P = .0265) while holding surgical complexity and an SRNA presence constant, but also reduced the likelihood of an on-time surgical start by 0.9359 (P = .0060). Larger teams decreased the odds of an on-time start by 0.7750 (P = .0363). We found that SRNAs potentially offer efficiency benefits, as their presence on a surgical team was associated with a 0.82% (1-0.9185 = 0.0815; P = .0007) decrease in total operative time, and a 21.01% (1-0.7899=0.2101; P = .0002) reduction in expected turnover time, after adjusting for confounding variables. ConclusionsSurgical efficiency is a modifiable function of surgical teams. Although we suggest additional research, surgical leaders can potentially improve team performance by improving familiarity and forming small and cohesive surgical teams. As OR inefficiencies degrade the financial vitality of healthcare systems, surgical leaders should engage in a multifaceted program to improve efficiency by building familiarity and optimizing team size.

Performance with robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D­laparoscopy during pancreatic and biliary anastomoses in a biotissue model: pooled analysis of two randomized trials

BackgroundRobotic surgery may improve surgical performance during minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy but comparative studies are lacking. This study assessed the impact of robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy on surgical performance and operative time using a standardized biotissue model for pancreatico- and hepatico-jejunostomy using pooled data from two randomized controlled crossover trials (RCTs).MethodsPooled analysis of data from two RCTs with 60 participants (36 surgeons, 24 residents) from 11 countries (December 2017–July 2019) was conducted. Each included participant completed two pancreatico- and two hepatico-jejunostomies in biotissue using 3D-robotic surgery, 3D-laparoscopy, or 2D-laparoscopy. Primary outcomes were the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS: 12–60) rating, scored by observers blinded for 3D/2D and the operative time required to complete both anastomoses. Sensitivity analysis excluded participants with excess experience compared to others.ResultsA total of 220 anastomoses were completed (robotic 80, 3D-laparoscopy 70, 2D­laparoscopy 70). Participants in the robotic group had less surgical experience [median 1 (0–2) versus 6 years (4–12), p < 0.001], as compared to the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery resulted in higher OSATS ratings (50, 43, 39 points, p = .021 and p < .001) and shorter operative time (56.5, 65.0, 81.5 min, p = .055 and p < .001), as compared to 3D- and 2D­laparoscopy, respectively, which remained in the sensitivity analysis.ConclusionIn a pooled analysis of two RCTs in a biotissue model, robotic surgery resulted in better surgical performance scores and shorter operative time for biotissue pancreatic and biliary anastomoses, as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy.

Digit Replantation under Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia.

Digit replantation under wide-awake local anesthesia is a challenging method, and there are only a few works of literature on this procedure. This article describes the authors' clinical experience in finger replantation under wide-awake local anesthesia compared to general anesthesia. Fifty-one patients who received single finger replantation after initial sharp amputation were included in the study, of whom 16 received wide-awake local anesthesia and 35 general anesthesia treatment. The indications for wide-awake local anesthesia were sharp amputation injury, estimated operation time less than 3 hours, and cooperative patients. The wide-awake local anesthesia was performed with 1% or 2% lidocaine infiltrated at the volar midpoint of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the affected digit without sedation medications. Demographic data included surgical outcome, waiting time, operation time, and hospital stay. A total of 51 consecutive patients were included in this study. There were significantly shorter waiting times and operation times in the wide-awake local anesthesia group. The other parameters showed no significant differences. The overall success rate was 76.47 percent, with a mean overall operation time of 207 minutes. In selected patients, finger replantation can be successfully performed under wide-awake local anesthesia, which has lower anesthesia risk and fewer medical expenses than general anesthesia. The method is feasible for single-digit replantation. Therefore, the finger replantation under wide-awake local anesthesia is a practicable alternative to general anesthesia. Therapeutic, III.

Analysis of Intraoperative Exposure to X-rays and Surgical Time in Different Techniques for Fixation of Transtrochanteric Fractures of the Femur.

Objective The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the total surgical procedure time and intraoperative X-ray exposure during different techniques for fixation of transtrochanteric fractures of the femur in elderly patients, using extramedullary and intramedullary methods based on cephalic traction screws. Methods The Orthopedics and Traumatology Service from our hospital evaluated 107 patients with transtrochanteric fractures, including 34 males and 73 females, with age ranging from 61 to 101 years old. Fracture fixation was performed with a dynamic hip system (DHS) in 21 patients, a standard proximal femoral nail (PFN) in 55 subjects, and a standard gamma nail in 31 patients. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon and his team of nursing assistants, along with the same radiology technician using the same image intensifier. Total surgery time (in minutes) and X-ray emission (in centigrays [cGy]) were evaluated. Results Transtrochanteric fracture fixation with PFN provides a significantly shorter surgical time ( p = 0.013) in comparison to the 2 other techniques. Intraoperative exposure to X-rays was significantly lower when using DHS ( p = 0.015) as a fixation method when compared with gamma nail and PFN. Conclusion Although PFN resulted in the shortest surgical time, DHS was associated with the lowest X-ray exposure levels within the studied sample.

2D versus 3D Endoscopy: Head-to-Head Comparison in a Simulated Model of Endoscopic Endonasal Dural Suturing.

Objective Endonasal dural suturing (EDS) has been reported to decrease the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid fistula. This technique requires handling of single-shaft instrumentation in the narrow endonasal corridor. It has been proposed that three-dimensional (3D) endoscopes were associated with improved depth perception. In this study, we sought to perform a comparison of two-dimensional (2D) versus 3D endoscopy by assessing surgical proficiency in a simulated model of EDS. Materials and Methods Twenty-six participants subdivided into groups based on previous endoscopic experience were asked to pass barbed sutures through preset targets with either 2D (Storz Hopkins II) or 3D (Storz TIPCAM) endoscopes on 3D-printed simulation model. Surgical precision and procedural time were measured. All participants completed a Likert scale questionnaire. Results Novice, intermediate, and expert groups took 11.0, 8.7, and 5.7 minutes with 2D endoscopy and 10.9, 9.0, and 7.6 minutes with 3D endoscopy, respectively. The average deviation for novice, intermediate, and expert groups (mm) was 5.5, 4.4, and 4.3 with 2D and 6.6, 4.6, and 3.0 with 3D, respectively. No significant difference in procedural time or accuracy was found in 2D versus 3D endoscopy. 2D endoscopic visualization was preferred by the majority of expert/intermediate participants, while 3D endoscopic visualization by the novice group. Conclusion In this pilot study, there was no statistical difference in procedural time or accuracy when utilizing 2D versus 3D endoscopes. While it is possible that widespread familiarity with 2D endoscopic equipment has biased this study, preliminary analysis suggests that 3D endoscopy offers no definitive advantage over 2D endoscopy in this simulated model of EDS.

EP.TH.772Meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus posterior sutured rectopexy for management of complete rectal prolapse

Abstract Objectives To evaluate comparative outcomes of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy (LMR) and laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy (LPSR) in patients with rectal prolapse Methods We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases and bibliographic reference lists with application of a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary search adapted to thesaurus headings, search operators and limits. Recurrence, Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS), Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS), surgical site infections, procedure time, and length of hospital stay were the evaluated outcome measures. Results We identified 5 comparative studies reporting a total of 307 patients evaluating outcomes of LMR (n = 160) or LPSR (n = 147) in patients with rectal prolapse. LMR was associated with significantly lower recurrence rate (OR:0.28, P = 0.009) but longer procedure time (MD:23.93, P &amp;lt; 0.0001) compared to LPSR. However, there was no significant difference in CCIS (MD:-1.02, P = 0.50), CCCS (MD:-1.54, P = 0.47), surgical site infection (OR:1.48, P = 0.71), and length of hospital stay (MD:-1.54, P = 0.47) between two groups. No mesh erosion was reported in any of the included studies at maximum follow-up point. Sub-group analyses with respect to ventral mesh rectopexy, posterior mesh rectopexy, randomised studies and adult patients were consistent with the main analysis. Conclusions LMR seems to be associated with lower recurrence but longer procedure time compared to LPSR. Although no mesh related complications have been reported by the included studies, no definitive conclusions can be made considering that the included studies were inadequately powered for such outcome. Future high quality randomised studies with adequate sample size are required.

1357 Ankle Blocks: Improving Day Case Efficiency

Abstract Introduction The COVID pandemic has exerted unprecedented pressure on hospital resources. Resulting in cancellation of elective operative services, increased patient waiting lists, limited surgical training opportunities along with reduced availability of staff, theatre, and in-patient bed capacity. A novel approach for day case forefoot surgery under ankle block, to mitigate the pandemic service limitations without compromising care, was developed. Method This is a 3-month, multi-centre, prospective cohort study evaluating the novel ankle block day case forefoot surgery pathway. Patients had a minimum of three months clinical follow up with outcome scores. They were matched to a cohort undergoing similar surgery prior to the COVID pandemic. Results The utilisation of an ankle block pathway resulted in an average reduction of inpatient stay by 2 days per patient. Over the study period conservative savings of £26,659 were calculated. Anecdotally we observed a reduction in morbidity (wound complications, SSI’s) although not statistically significant. Conclusions Our novel surgical pathway has enabled continued elective operating for procedures that previously required hospital admission during a period of severe restrictions within the NHS. We observed significant reductions in cost, surgical inpatient bed utilisation and total operative time with staff, resource, and time savings. We hypothesise that prehabilitation with physiotherapy, ankle instead of thigh tourniquets and early mobilisation may have contributed to improved morbidity scores. The findings of this project have implications for training, upper limb services and are transferrable as a template to improve service efficiency while maintaining high quality care.

Mathematical Analysis of Application of a Three-Dimensional Printing Fixator in the Fracture of Multiple Ribs.

Data were obtained from 66 clinical patients. The patients were divided into a non-3D printing group (control group) and a 3D printing group (intervention group) in a 1 : 1 ratio, with 33 patients in each group. The information including gender, age, incision length, number of surgical roots, bleeding volume, operation time, and intraoperative blood transfusion was collected for SPSS analysis. The results showed the following: (1) The paired t-test was used to test the difference of experimental data. There was a significant difference of 0.01 between the incision length/surgical root number in the intervention group and the incision length/surgical root number in the control group. The incision length/surgical root number in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group. (2) Surgical time, intraoperative blood transfusion, age, and incision length/surgical root number in the intervention group had a significant positive impact on the amount of bleeding. Gender did not affect the amount of bleeding. (3) A total of 1 item of operation time in the intervention group had a significant positive impact on intraoperative blood transfusion. (4) The incision length/number of surgical roots in the intervention group had a noteworthy negative impact on blood transfusion during the operation.

Implementation of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the public health system: a comparative cost analysis.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may improve the precision of bone preparation and component alignment when compared to the conventional surgical approach; however, the detailed cost analysis of robotic-assisted TKA is lacking. This study aims to compare in-hospital costs between robotic-assisted and computer-navigated TKA. Patients undergoing primary TKA at a public hospital in Sydney between October 2018 and June 2019 were included. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes and in-hospital cost variables including, staff, critical care, emergency department, diagnostic, prosthesis, operating room, ward and other related costs until the discharge to the community were collected. Differences across in-hospital costs between robotic-assisted and computer-navigated TKA were compared using independent Student's t-tests. Of the 258 primary TKAs, 181 (70.2%) were computer-navigated and 77 (29.8%) robotic-assisted. Surgical time (p < 0.001) and operating time (p < 0.001) were both significantly shorter in computer-navigated TKA, while robotic-assisted TKA cases were more likely to be discharged directly home without extended in-patient rehabilitation (p = 0.014). When removing the capital costs of surgical equipment and maintenance, there was no difference in total in-hospital cost between computer-navigated ($19,512.3) and robotic-assisted TKA ($18,347.1; p = 0.179). When these capital costs were included, the mean in-hospital cost of robotic-assisted surgery was $21,507.6 compared to $19,659.7 for computer-navigated TKA (p = 0.034). The total in-hospital cost, during the implementation period of robotic-assisted TKA, is comparable with computer-navigated TKA. Robotic-assisted TKA was significantly more expensive when the upfront cost of the robotic system and maintenance costs were included. Longer term cost benefit of robotic-assisted TKA should be investigated in future studies.

Autologous reconstructions are associated with greater overall medium-term care costs than implant-based reconstructions in the Finnish healthcare system: A retrospective interim case-control cohort study

Previous studies have mainly reported the short-term costs of different reconstruction techniques. Revision operations may increase costs in longer follow-up. Authors report medium-term data on different reconstruction methods. We hypothesised that the reconstruction method would affect not only the duration of reconstruction process but also total costs. The reconstruction database was reviewed from 2008 to 2019. Women with autologous (deep inferior epigastric perforator, transverse musculocutaneous gracilis and latissimus dorsi [LD] without implant) and implant-based (implant and LD with implant) reconstructions were included. Variables evaluated included age, body mass index, smoking, comorbidities, radiotherapy, complications and readmissions. Risk factors for multiple revision surgeries were analysed. Time to definitive reconstruction and related costs were also calculated. In total, 591 patients with autologous reconstructions and 202 with implant-based reconstructions were included. The median follow-up time was 73 months. Definitive reconstruction was obtained in 443 days in implant-based reconstructions and in 403 days in autologous reconstructions (P=0.050). Independent risk factors for multiple surgeries were younger age (P<0.001) and comorbidity (P=0.008). No statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of overall surgical procedures (P=0.098), but implant-based reconstructions were more commonly associated with two or more planned operations (P=0.008). Autologous reconstructions were associated with greater total cost ($22 052vs. $18 329, P<0.001). This review of reconstructions over a 12-year study period revealed that autologous reconstructions are associated with greater overall costs, but there is no statistically significant difference in reconstruction time or rate of surgical procedures. However, a full cost assessment between reconstructive techniques requires a much longer follow-up period.

Laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy for dogs under 5kg body weight.

To describe the surgical method, operative time, safety, and usefulness of 3-port laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy (LOHE) using an ultrasonic coagulation and incision device in dogs <5 kg. Retrospective study. Female dogs (n = 147). Animals were allocated to one of four groups by bodyweight: <2 kg (n = 18), 2-3 kg (n = 37), 3-4 kg (n = 55), and 4-5 kg (n = 37). All surgical procedures were recorded on video. Mean operative time (i.e., time from first skin incision to last suture), clinical variables, hematologic variables, and blood biochemistry were recorded. Intrasurgical and postsurgical complications were recorded, and wound complications, including signs of inflammation or hernia formation were monitored for 3 months. The mean operative time for all groups was 18 min, with no significant differences between groups. Eight dogs bled from the mesometrium during surgery. Two dogs had hernia formation at a midline port incision; this complication developed by month 3. No complications such as wound dehiscence or infection of the surgical field were observed at the time of suture removal in any of the dogs. We performed LOHE using an ultrasonic coagulation and incision device in dogs <5 kg, and found it to be a safe procedure with minimal complications. We believe that LOHE, using a 3-port and ultrasonic coagulation and incision device, is a safe, useful, and minimally invasive surgical method for sterilization of dogs <5 kg with minimal complications.

632 SUTURED VERSUS MESH-AUGMENTED HIATUS HERNIA REPAIR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Abstract Repair of large hiatus hernias is increasingly being performed. However, there is no consensus for the optimal technique for hiatal closure between sutured versus mesh-augmented (absorbable or non-absorbable) repair. This meta-analysis systematically reviewed published randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing sutured versus mesh-augmented hiatus hernia (HH) repair. Our primary endpoint was HH recurrence at short- and long-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints were: surgical complications, operative times, dysphagia and quality of life. Methods A systematic review of Medline, Scopus (which encompassed Embase), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and PubMed was performed to identify relevant studies comparing mesh-augmented versus sutured HH repair. Data were extracted and compared by meta-analysis, using odds ratio and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Results Seven RCTs were found which compared mesh-augmented (non-absorbable mesh: n = 296; absorbable mesh: n = 92) with sutured repair (n = 347). There were no significant differences for short-term hernia recurrence (defined as 6–12 months, 10.1% mesh versus 15.5% sutured, P = 0.22), long-term hernia recurrence (defined as 3–5 years, 30.7% mesh vs 31.3% sutured, P = 0.69), functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. The only statistically significant difference was that the mesh repair required a longer operation time (P = 0.05, OR 2.33, 95% CI 0.03–24.69). Conclusion Mesh repair for hiatus hernia does not offer any advantage over sutured hiatal closure. As both techniques deliver good and comparable clinical outcomes, a suture only technique is still an appropriate approach.

Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Resection for Sigmoid and Rectal Cancer: Analysis of 109 Patients From a Single Center in China.

Background: Robotic colorectal surgery has been increasingly performed in recent years. The safety and feasibility of its application has also been demonstrated worldwide.However, limited studies have presented clinical data for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving robotic surgery in China. The aim of this study is to present short-term clinical outcomes of robotic surgery and further confirm its safety and feasibility in Chinese CRC patients.Methods: The clinical data of 109 consecutive CRC patients who received robotic surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics,tumor traits, treatment details, complications, pathological details, and survival status were evaluated.Results: Among the 109 patients, 35 (32.1%) had sigmoid cancer, and 74 (67.9%) had rectal cancer. Thirty-seven (33.9%) patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ten (9.2%) patients underwent sigmoidectomy, 38 (34.9%) underwent high anterior resection (HAR), 45 (41.3%) underwent low anterior resection (LAR), and 16 (14.7%) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR). The median surgical procedure time was 270 min (range 120–465 min). Pathologically complete resection was achieved in all patients. There was no postoperative mortality. Complications occurred in 11 (10.1%) patients, including 3 (2.8%) anastomotic leakage, 1 (0.9%) anastomotic bleeding, 1 (0.9%) pelvic hemorrhage, 4 (3.7%) intestinal obstruction, 2 (1.8%) chylous leakage, and 1 (0.9%) delayed wound union. At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 1–37 months), 1 (0.9%) patient developed local recurrence and 5 (4.6%) developed distant metastasis, with one death due to disease progression.Conclusions: Our results suggest that robotic surgery is technically feasible and safe for Chinese CRC patients, especially for rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant treatment. A robotic laparoscope with large magnification showed a clear surgical space for pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in cases of mesorectal edema.

Augmented-Reality-Assisted K-Wire Placement for Glenoid Component Positioning in Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

The accuracy of the implant’s post-operative position and orientation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is known to play a significant role in both clinical and functional outcomes. Whilst technologies such as navigation and robotics have demonstrated superior radiological outcomes in many fields of surgery, the impact of augmented reality (AR) assistance in the operating room is still unknown. Malposition of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty is known to result in implant failure and early revision surgery. The use of AR has many promising advantages, including allowing the detailed study of patient-specific anatomy without the need for invasive procedures such as arthroscopy to interrogate the joint’s articular surface. In addition, this technology has the potential to assist surgeons intraoperatively in aiding the guidance of surgical tools. It offers the prospect of increased component placement accuracy, reduced surgical procedure time, and improved radiological and functional outcomes, without recourse to the use of large navigation or robotic instruments, with their associated high overhead costs. This feasibility study describes the surgical workflow from a standardised CT protocol, via 3D reconstruction, 3D planning, and use of a commercial AR headset, to AR-assisted k-wire placement. Post-operative outcome was measured using a high-resolution laser scanner on the patient-specific 3D printed bone. In this proof-of-concept study, the discrepancy between the planned and the achieved glenoid entry point and guide-wire orientation was approximately 3 mm with a mean angulation error of 5°.

Comparison of Three Different Surgical Fixation Techniques in Pediatric Forearm Double Fractures.

IntroductionAlthough forearm fractures are one of the most common fractures in children, controversy remains about the optimal fixation technique in the surgical treatment of these fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the results of pediatric patients with a forearm double fracture who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (plate-screw group), elastic intramedullary nailing to both bones (ESIN), and hybrid fixation (the radius or ulna is fixed with the help of ESIN and the other forearm bone is fixed using plate-screw).MethodsA retrospective scan was made of the records of 51 patients with forearm double diaphyseal fractures (19 plate-screw, 18 ESIN, and 14 hybrid fixation). Comparisons were made in respect of the duration of surgery, length of the incision, duration of follow-up, time to union, functional results, and complication rates.ResultsThe study results showed that the surgical incision length and operating time in the hybrid group were statistically significantly shorter than in the plate-screw group (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the three groups in respect of the functional results (p>0.05).ConclusionWhen the hybrid fixation technique was compared with other methods, the results were equal or better in terms of surgery time, incision length, time to union, and complications. Therefore, this technique can be used as an effective and reliable method in appropriate pediatric forearm diaphyseal double fractures.

Analysis of Factors Relevant to Revenue Enhancement in Hernia Interventions (SwissDRG G09).

Background: Since diagnosis-related groups (SwissDRG) were established in Switzerland in 2012, small and medium-size hospitals have encountered increasing financial troubles. Even though hernia repair operations are frequent, most hospitals fail to cover their costs with these procedures. Previous studies have focused mainly on analyzing costs and the contributing factors but less on variables that can be positively influenced. Therefore, this study aims to identify the relevant and influenceable factors for revenue growth in hernia repair surgery. Methods: Data from all patients who underwent the SwissDRG G09 surgery for a hernia in 2019 were analyzed. The contribution margin (CM4), as well as any over- or under-coverage, was correlated to case-specific costs. Results: A total of 168 patients received hernia repair surgery with the SwissDRG code G09. The average revenue/loss generated by one procedure was CHF −623.84. Procedures covered by the General Health Insurance (OKP) generated a loss of CHF −830.70 on average, whereas procedures covered by private insurance companies (VVG) generated revenue of CHF +1100 on average. Significant factors impacting the profitability of hernia repair operations were teaching during surgery (p < 0.005), the surgical operating time (p < 0.001), the total anesthesia time (p < 0.001), the number of surgeons present (p = 0.022), the insurance state of patients (p < 0.001), and the type of surgery (p < 0.01 for Lichtenstein’s procedure). Conclusions: This study reveals that hernia repair surgery performed under cost coverage by OKP is generally unprofitable. Our results further imply that the most important and influenceable factors for revenue enhancement are the quality and process optimization of the surgical department. To compensate for this deficit, hospitals should aim to increase the percentage of patients with private health insurance coverage in their procedures. Since outpatient surgery does not provide a valid alternative due to the low reimbursement by insurance companies, the cost efficiency of inpatient hernia repair needs to be increased by process optimization of the surgical department; for instance, by providing specialized hernia teams performing with shorter operation times and high quality.

Duct-dependent cyanotic neonates with patent ductus arteriosus stenting pose a unique challenge for the next stage of surgical intervention

Objective To study the role of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stenting in the management of single-ventricle patients and the surgical difficulties facing the surgeons in the next stages of surgical procedures. Background Thirty consecutive neonates with cyanotic duct-dependent lesions were initially palliated with (PDA) stenting in our center. Eighteen of them had undergone one or more surgical procedures. We retrospectively assessed the indexed growth of pulmonary arteries (PA) over a period of time and the requirement of further rehabilitation of PAs in these patients. Patients and methods From January 2014 to December 2018, 30 neonates with cyanotic congenital heart diseases underwent PDA stenting as initial palliation; 60% were ventilated before the procedure, which resulted in 100% success. All patients were followed up regularly by monitoring of PA size imaging. Eighteen patients of this group underwent further surgical procedures. Results Ninety percent of the neonates had stenosis of the PA branches before PDA stenting. The indexed PA branch size was significantly smaller, which increased after stenting of PDA. At the time of the next surgical procedures (Glenn, etc.), stent division/ligation was required in addition to PA plasty in 90% of patients. Conclusions PDA stenting provides efficient palliation in cyanotic neonates. Despite the origin of stenosis, the stent allowed growth in the size of both PAs. However, the majority required surgical augmentation and further stenting of PAs in the mid-term follow-up.

Insulin Dose Adjustment Following Bariatric Surgery, a Review of Available Literature.

Bariatric surgery is a known and effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and exogenous insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes mellitus require adjusted insulin dosing after surgery to avoid hypoglycemia. This review describes insulin dose adjustments following a variety of bariatric procedures. After searching the available literature and assessing for eligibility, 8 articles were included. The Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool for literature appraisal was used. The results of this review reveal insulin dose adjustment varies based upon surgical procedure type and time of follow-up from the procedure.