Background: Pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis cause the vast majority of isolated PD strictures. The diagnostic workup requires the differentiation of benign from malignant strictures. This vital distinction leads to the consideration of surgical pancreatic resection for malignant disease while benign strictures can often be managed by endoscopy. Unfortunately, brush cytology (BC) of malignant strictures yields positive findings in less than one half of patients. In the absence of positive brush cytology, one must consider alternative methods to judge the likelihood of malignancy. Objective: Determine the diagnostic performance of EUS in the detection of pancreatic cancer in the setting of an isolated PD stricture with negative BC. Methods: From January 2000 to November 2004, 2692 patients underwent ERCP among whom 131 had BC negative PD strictures. Fifty one patients had isolated PD strictures while the remaining 80 cases had concomitant biliary strictures. All patients who had an isolated PD stricture and had undergone EUS examination were included in the study (28 patients, 14 females, median of age: 55, age range: 26-79). A compound criteria was used for the final diagnosis. 24 patients had benign strictures based on (a) surgical-pathologic confirmation (8 patients) or (b) results of clinical follow-up of at least 12 months demonstrating a lack of clinical or radiologic disease progression (16 patients). In 4 patients with malignant stricture, this determination was based on (a) malignant cytologic results at endoscopic US–guided FNAB, with a subsequent clinical course consistent with malignant disease (1 patient) or (b) surgical-pathologic confirmation (laparotomy) (3 patients). The results of initial EUS studies were compared to the final diagnosis. The presence of a mass was considered indicative of malignancy on EUS exam. Results: Twenty four patients had benign strictures while 4 patients had malignant strictures (prevalence of 15%). All patients with malignant strictures were accurately identified on EUS exam. There were no false negative findings. Of the 24 patients with benign strictures 22 were accurately identified on EUS exam. Two cases were falsely positive (mass visualized). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of EUS in our set of patients were 100%, 92%, 67%, and 100% respectively. Conclusion: In the setting of an isolated PD stricture, the absence of a mass lesion on EUS effectively excludes underlying malign. Background: Pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis cause the vast majority of isolated PD strictures. The diagnostic workup requires the differentiation of benign from malignant strictures. This vital distinction leads to the consideration of surgical pancreatic resection for malignant disease while benign strictures can often be managed by endoscopy. Unfortunately, brush cytology (BC) of malignant strictures yields positive findings in less than one half of patients. In the absence of positive brush cytology, one must consider alternative methods to judge the likelihood of malignancy. Objective: Determine the diagnostic performance of EUS in the detection of pancreatic cancer in the setting of an isolated PD stricture with negative BC. Methods: From January 2000 to November 2004, 2692 patients underwent ERCP among whom 131 had BC negative PD strictures. Fifty one patients had isolated PD strictures while the remaining 80 cases had concomitant biliary strictures. All patients who had an isolated PD stricture and had undergone EUS examination were included in the study (28 patients, 14 females, median of age: 55, age range: 26-79). A compound criteria was used for the final diagnosis. 24 patients had benign strictures based on (a) surgical-pathologic confirmation (8 patients) or (b) results of clinical follow-up of at least 12 months demonstrating a lack of clinical or radiologic disease progression (16 patients). In 4 patients with malignant stricture, this determination was based on (a) malignant cytologic results at endoscopic US–guided FNAB, with a subsequent clinical course consistent with malignant disease (1 patient) or (b) surgical-pathologic confirmation (laparotomy) (3 patients). The results of initial EUS studies were compared to the final diagnosis. The presence of a mass was considered indicative of malignancy on EUS exam. Results: Twenty four patients had benign strictures while 4 patients had malignant strictures (prevalence of 15%). All patients with malignant strictures were accurately identified on EUS exam. There were no false negative findings. Of the 24 patients with benign strictures 22 were accurately identified on EUS exam. Two cases were falsely positive (mass visualized). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of EUS in our set of patients were 100%, 92%, 67%, and 100% respectively. Conclusion: In the setting of an isolated PD stricture, the absence of a mass lesion on EUS effectively excludes underlying malign.
Read full abstract