Surgical Margin Status Research Articles

Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Treatment Outcomes of Oropharyngeal Cancer After Surgery

Background and Objectives This study analyzed data from patients who were diagnosed with human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal (OPC) and treated surgically to construct a machine learning survival prediction model.Subjects and Method We retrospectively analyzed the clinico-pathological data of 203 patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) from 2007 to 2015.Results In the Cox proportional hazard (CPH) model, the c-index values for the training set and the test set were 0.81 and 0.59, respectively. The univariate analysis showed that contralateral lymph nodes (LNs) metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, pN, stage, surgical margin status, histologic grade, pT, and the number of metastatic LNs had significant correlations with survival. Contrastively, the multivariate analysis showed pT and histologic grade to have significant correlation with survival. In the random survival forest model, the c-index values for the training set and the test set were 0.83 and 0.87, respectively. In the DeepSurv model, the cindex values for the training set and the test set were 0.75 and 0.83. Among the three models mentioned above, Random Survival Forest and DeepSurv showed the best performance for predicting the survival of HPV-associated OPSCC patients.Conclusion We confirmed that a survival prediction model using machine learning and deep learning algorithms showed reasonable survival estimates for HPV-associated OPSCC patients.

Phase 2, multicenter, randomized study of salvage radiation therapy +/- metformin for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (SAKK 08/15 – GETUG-AFU 34 PROMET trial).

353 Background: Pre-clinical and retrospective clinical data support an interaction of metformin (MET) and radiotherapy. Thus, MET may represent a cost-effective means to improve radiotherapy outcomes. We sought to investigate whether MET increases time to progression (TTP) when combined with salvage radiation therapy (SRT) in men with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: Non-diabetic men with biochemical recurrence after RP were enrolled into an open label, randomized, phase 2 study in 17 hospitals in Switzerland, France, and Germany. The randomization (1:1) was stratified by Gleason score (<8 vs ≥8), surgical margin status (R0 vs R1), PSA at randomization (PSA > 0.5 vs ≤ 0.5 ng/mL), ADT use, and evidence of local recurrence. Following randomization, patients received either prostate bed SRT (70Gy) or prostate bed SRT (70Gy) + MET. MET 850mg PO QD was given for 4 weeks before SRT, then 850mg PO QD for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was TTP. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, undetectable PSA under normal testosterone levels, 50% PSA response, clinical progression-free survival, time to further systemic therapy, prostate cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and adverse events (AE). The trial design was powered for a HR 0.65 with planned enrollment of 170 patients. The trial was prematurely closed by the sponsor due to financial reasons. Data is reported after patients reached a minimum follow-up of 12 months after SRT and corresponds to the final analysis. Results: A total of 111 patients were randomized (106 evaluable) between 10/2017 and 11/2020. The median PSA at randomization was 0.3 ng/mL (range, 0.03-1.5 ng/mL), 19 patients (17.9%) had Gleason ≥8, 54 (50.9%) pT3 disease, and 50 (47.2%) positive surgical margins. Twenty-four patients (22.6%) used short-term ADT. Trial arms were well balanced. At a median follow-up of 27.1 months (95% CI: 26.7-27.8), a total of 16 progression events occurred. The median TTP was not reached in either treatment arm. The hazard ratio adjusted by stratification factors was 1.25 (95% CI: 0.40-3.94; one-sided 80% CI: 2.05; log-rank p=0.62). Two-year TTP was 89% (95% CI: 76%-96%) in the SRT arm vs 82% (95% CI: 67%-91%) in the SRT + MET arm. No statistically significant differences were found for the secondary endpoints. Most common AE during treatment was grade 1-2 diarrhea (24.1% SRT vs 54.6% SRT + MET). Grade 2 and 3 AE (gastrointestinal and/or urinary) were 25.9% and 3.7% with SRT vs 34.5% and 7.3% with SRT + MET (p=0.41 and p=0.68), respectively. Conclusions: Adding MET to SRT did not result in a significant improvement in TTP in non-diabetic men with recurrent prostate cancer post-RP. Because of early trial closure and fewer than expected events, the trial may have been underpowered for this endpoint. Additional correlative studies will be pursued. Clinical trial information: NCT02945813 .

Clinical analysis of 5-year survival and recurrence in giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma after surgery.

Clinical analysis of 5-year survival and recurrence in giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma after surgery.

Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes of Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

This study aimed to compare the oncological, functional, and perioperative outcomes of localized and locally advanced prostate cancer treated with intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). From April, 2008, through December, 2020, 266 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, 168 cases with an extraperitoneal approach (E-LRP) and 98 cases using a transperitoneal approach (T-LRP). The clinical, perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes were collected and compared between these groups. At the 3-, 12- and 24-monthfollow-ups, the functional outcomes tested were urinary function (urinary domain of EPIC) and sexual function (sexual domain of EPIC). The oncological outcomes of biochemical recurrence, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and positive surgical margin status were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors predictive for biochemical recurrence. All statistical analyses used the R program. The patient characteristics were similar between the E-LRP and T-LRP groups except for higher prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) in the T-LRP group. The T-LRP had lower overall operative time (222.5 min vs. 290 min, p 0.001), decreased blood loss (400 ml vs. 800 ml, p < 0.001), and shorter hospital stays (4 days vs. 7 days, p < 0.001) compared to the E-LRP. Early sexual intercourse with penetration at 3 months was higher in the T-LRP group (36.7% vs. 15.5%, p 0.001). Urinary continence (no pads) was not different between the T-LRP and E-LRP groups at 3 and 24 months after surgery but higher in the E-LRP group at 12 months (1% vs. 3%; p=0.419, 85.1 vs. 83.7%; p=0.889, 47.4% vs. 34.6%; p=0.028, respectively). The EPIC questionnaire was used to assess functional outcomes at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery and found that urinary function was significantly higher in the T-LRP group at 3 and 12 months (p < 0.001) but did not show a difference at 24 months (p=0.734), and sexual function scores were higher in the T-LRP group at 12 and 24 months (p=0.001). The positive surgical margin rate was higher in the E-LRP (38.7% vs. 21.4%; p=0.006). The BCR rate was not different between the groups (36.3% in the E-LRP group and 27.6% in the E-LRP group; p=0.184). Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (T-LRP) was found to be superior to extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (E-LRP) in perioperative outcomes such as decreased operative time, decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stay, lower positive surgical margin, and improved early sexual intercourse and sexual function. The urinary functional outcome was better in the T-LRP group at 3 and 12 months. These findings support the use of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, as our study patients exhibited significant benefits from this procedure.

Differences in Quality of Life between German and Dutch Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundAs a local treatment for prostate cancer (PCa), robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may have a quality of life (QoL) benefit over open surgery. Recent analyses revealed substantial between-country differences in the function and symptom scale scores for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), which is typically used to assess patient-reported QoL. Such differences could have implications for multinational studies in PCa. ObjectiveTo examine whether nationality is significantly associated with patient-reported QoL. Design, setting, and participantsThe study cohort comprised Dutch and German patients with PCa treated with RARP in a single high-volume prostate center from 2006 to 2018. Analyses were restricted to patients who were preoperatively continent with at least one follow-up time point. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisQoL was measured in terms of the global Quality of Life (QL) scale score and the overall summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Linear mixed models for repeated-measures multivariable analyses (MVAs) were used to examine the association between nationality and both the global QL score and the summary score. MVAs were further adjusted for QLQ-C30 baseline values, age, Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, surgical expertise, pathological tumor and nodal stage, Gleason grade, degree of nerve-sparing, surgical margin status, 30-d Clavien-Dindo grade complications, urinary continence recovery, and biochemical recurrence/postoperative radiotherapy. Results and limitationsFor Dutch (n = 1938) versus German (n = 6410) men, the mean baseline scores were 82.8 versus 71.9 for the global QL scale score and 93.4 versus 89.7 for the QLQ-C30 summary score. Urinary continence recovery (QL: +8.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1–9.8; p < 0001) and Dutch nationality (QL: +6.9, 95% CI 6.1–7.6; p < 0001) were the strongest positive contributors to the global QL and summary scores, respectively. The main limitation is the retrospective study design. In addition, our Dutch cohort may not be representative of the general Dutch population and reporting bias cannot be ruled out. ConclusionsOur findings provide observational evidence under specific conditions involving the same setting for patients of two different nationalities suggesting that cross-national patient-reported QoL differences appear to be real and may need to be taken into consideration in multinational studies. Patient summaryWe observed differences in the quality-of-life scores reported by Dutch and German patients with prostate cancer after they underwent robot-assisted removal of the prostate. These findings should be taken into consideration in cross-national studies.

La prostatectomía radical retropúbica abierta es todavía una técnica quirúrgica bien establecida para el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata

IntroductionThe surgical treatment options for prostate cancer have changed rapidly, given the expansion of robotics. However, open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) will continue to be performed in areas with financial limitations or with limited access to robotics. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term oncological outcomes, to categorize complication rates and to examine the early continence rates in patients treated with ORP. MethodsWe identified all patients who underwent ORP at our institution between 2000 and 2020. A standardized pad test was used to determine the early continence rates upon catheter removal, the late continence around a year after surgery was determined by the number of pads per day. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to report the complication rates. The biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were defined using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariable Cox-regression models were used to test the effect of different factors on biochemical recurrence. ResultsWe analyzed 1095 patients. The median follow-up was 93.4months. An overall 10-year BCR-free survival and OS of 73% and 82% respectively was found. A complication rate for Clavien Dindo ≥3 was seen in 4.8% of patients. The early continence rate was 81.4% and the late continence 89.1%. Preoperative PSA level, Gleason score sum, pT stage, lymph node status, and surgical margin status were independent predictors of BCR (P<.001). Limitations include retrospective and single centre study design. ConclusionsORP is a surgical procedure that provides excellent oncological- and early continence-rates.

Epidemiology of Merkel cell carcinoma in Tuscany (Italy), 2006-2021.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer that still has a poor prognosis. MCC incidence has increased in recent years worldwide. The aim of our study was to perform an epidemiological retrospective study and to evaluate the impact of MCC clinical and pathological features on overall survival (OS) in a specific geographical area. We retrospectively collected 94 pathology reports from 2006 to 2021 that were present in the pathology archives of the University Hospital of Pisa and of the Hospital of Livorno. Laterality was different according to the site, and almost half of the lesions were T1 and nearly half of the patients had a clinical stage III. We reported a dramatic increase in MCC diagnoses in the last 5 years compared with the previous years, with a crude incidence rate of 1,15/100000 inhabitants, almost doubling the last reported data in Italy. Surgical margins status and ulceration were not related to OS. We have noticed some patients with a rapidly progressing disease and others showing a slow disease progression which should prompt the investigation of specific biomarkers or other features that could elucidate this striking difference in progression-free survival and could potentially identify different subtypes of MCC. Considering the generally low incidence of MCC worldwide, larger cohorts would be necessary to validate our data and to obtain a better prognostic stratification.

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a medium size oncological center holds adequate oncological and functional outcomes

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) has emerged as a surgical option for patients with prostatic cancer in high-volume centers. The objective is to assess oncological and functional outcomes when implementing RS-RARP in a medium-volume center without previous experience of robotic surgery. This is a prospective observational single-center study. Patients operated between July 2017 and April 2020 were divided into two consecutive groups, A and B, each with 104 patients. The surgeons had prior experience in laparoscopic surgery and underwent robotic training. Positive surgical margin (PSM) status, urinary continence, and erectile function projected by Kaplan–Meier curves, together with patient reported quality of life outcomes at 12 months post-surgery were documented. Median patient age was 63 years (IQR = 59–67), overall PSM rate were 33%, 28% for pT2 disease. Pre-operative values showed no significant difference between both groups. The rate of urinary continence dropped from 81 to 78% (SE = 5.7) (Group A) and from 90 to 72% (SE = 6.3) (Group B) using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. Baseline sexual function was regained in 41% (Group A) and 47% (Group B) of patients. The median Expanded Prostate Index Composite-26 total score decreased from 86 to 82. These outcomes relate favorably to prior reports. There was a clinically significant decrease in median operative time in the successive groups with post-operative complications occurring in less than 2% of surgical procedures overall. A 12-month follow-up suggests that RS-RARP may be safely introduced in a medium-volume center without previous experience of robotic surgery.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of surgically treated extramammary Paget's disease of the vulva.

Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) of the vulva is a rare disease which predominantly presents in postmenopausal Caucasian women. As yet, no studies on Asian female patients with EMPD have been performed. This study aimed to identify the clinical features of patients with vulvar EMPD in Korea, and to evaluate the risk factors of recurrence and postoperative complications in surgically treated EMPD. We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients with vulvar EMPD who underwent wide local excision or radical vulvectomy. The clinical data and surgical and oncological outcomes following surgery were extracted from medical records and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses for predicting recurrence and postoperative complications were performed. 21.3% of patients had complications after surgery, and wound dehiscence was the most common. 14.9% of patients experienced recurrence, and the median interval to recurrence from initial treatment was 69 (range 33-169) months. Vulvar lesions larger than 40 mm was the independent risk factor of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR]=7.259; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.545-34.100; p=0.012). Surgical margin status was not associated with recurrence in surgically treated vulvar EMPD patients (OR=0.83; 95% CI=0.16-4.19; p=1.000). Positive surgical margin is a frequent finding in the patients with vulvar EMPD, but disease recurrence is not related with surgical margin status. Since EMPD is a slow growing tumor, a surveillance period longer than 5 years is required.

Prognostic factors and the role of adjuvant radiation therapy in Non-melanoma skin cancer: Retrospective, A single-center experience

Objective: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most prevalent malignancy worldwide, with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) representing the most common types of NMSC. In this retrospective analysis, patients with NMSC who had adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) had their treatment results and prognostic variables evaluated. Material and Methods: A total of 115 patients with NMSC who had adjuvant RT in our clinic during January 2006 and September 2021 were assessed. The average age was 74 years, and the male to female ratio was 1.95:1. (range: 25–95). The most often diagnosed kind of NMSC was SCC (93%, n=107), preceded by BCC (7%, n=8). The extremities (17.4%, n=20), the trunk (1.7%, n=2), and the head and neck area (80.9%, n=93) were where the bulk of NMSC lesions were discovered. Results: The mean follow-up period was 60.7 months (the range was 4.2–194.7); metastases were found in six patients (5.2%), and locoregional recurrence was identified in 24 patients (20.8%). The 3- and 5-year total survival percentages were 71.2% and 59.3%, respectively, and the median overall survival (OS) time was 87.1 months. Tumor size and surgical margin status were linked to a worse OS in multivariate analysis of prognostic variables (hazard rate [HR]=3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-5.2; p=0,001 and HR=2.4, 95% CI: 1.4-4.1; P=0,002, respectively). Conclusion: Postoperative RT is an efficient, acceptable therapeutic option for NMSC in high-risk individuals. Our results suggest that surgical margin and tumor size were independent predictors of OS in NMSC patients; nevertheless, future studies including more patients are required to corroborate these results.

Hysterectomy through Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical High-grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Reassessment of the Specimens' Eligibility for Histological Examination.

The objective was to investigate the microscopic artifacts made in the uterus of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) resected by hysterectomy through minimally invasive (H-MI) procedures and to verify whether these specimens are suitable for histopathological assessment. This single-center retrospective study analyzed 28 patients with cervical HSIL, consisting of 21 premenopausal and seven postmenopausal women, who underwent H-MI. The proportion of the cervical mucosa covered by intact surface epithelium (residual ratio [RR]) was measured on microscopically. Surgical margin's status was also verified. All cases developed detachment of the cervical surface epithelium to a varying extent. The RR was significantly higher in the premenopausal patients (median: 75.5%) than in the postmenopausal patients (median: 37.6%). Among the premenopausal patients, the RR was lower in the cases on whom uterine manipulator (UM) was used (median: 70.5%) than in the cases without UM use (median 92.7%). Among the 21 cases whose resected uterus contained HSIL, the vaginal resection margin was not assessable in three (14.2%) of the seven postmenopausal cases due to the artifact. Although transvaginal manipulation of the uterus causes detachment of the cervical surface epithelium, H-MI for cervical HSIL provides an acceptable specimen for histological assessment in premenopausal patients, even if UM is used. In postmenopausal women, H-MI easily develops artifactual loss of cervical surface epithelium, sometimes providing an unfavorable specimen for microscopic assessment.

Predictors of trainees' proficiency during the learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at high- -volume institutions: results from a multicentric series.

The aim of this series was to evaluate predictors of Proficiency score (PS) achievement on a multicentric series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARP) performed by trainee surgeons with two different surgical techniques at four tertiary-care centers. Four institutional datasets were merged and queried for RARPs performed by surgeons during their learning curve (LC) between 2010 and 2020 using two different approaches (Group A, Retzius-sparing RARP, n = 164; Group B, standard anterograde RARP, n = 79). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of PS achievement for the overall trainee cohort. For all analyses, a two-sided p <0.05 was considered significant. Group B showed significantly increased median operative time, positive surgical margins (PSM) status, increased number of nerve-sparing procedures, shorter LC time (each p <0.04). PS, continence status, potency, biochemical recurrence and 1-year trifecta rates were comparable between groups (each p >0.3). On multivariable analysis, time from LC starting ≥12 months (OR = 2.79; 95%IC [1.15-6.76]; p = 0.02) and a nerve-sparing intent (OR = 3.18; 95%IC [1.15-8.77]; p = 0.02) were independent predictors of PS score achievement (Table 3). Higher PS rates for RARP trainees may be expected after 12 months from LC beginning. Short-term training courses are unlikely to confer proper surgical training, while long-term structured training programs seem to be beneficial on perioperative outcomes.

Tumor biology reflected by histological growth pattern is more important than surgical margin for the prognosis of patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases.

The histological growth pattern (HGP) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) reflects tumor biology and local infiltrating behavior. In patients undergoing surgery for CRLMs, we investigated whether HGP and surgical margin status interact when influencing prognosis. Clinicopathological data, margin status, and HGP were reviewed in patients who underwent resection of CRLMs. R1 margin was defined when cancer cells were present at any point along the margin. HGPs were scored according to international guidelines, identifying patients with desmoplastic (DHGP) or non-desmoplastic (non-DHGP) CRLMs. Among 299 patients, 16% had R1 resection and 81% had non-DHGP CRLMs. Non-DHGP was the only predictive factor for R1 resection (18.7% versus 7.4% in DHGP, p=0.04). Poorer 5-year overall survival was observed in both R1 and non-DHGP groups in univariate analysis (27.6% in R1 versus 45.6% in R0, p=0.026, and 37.2% in non-DHGP versus 59.2% in DHGP, p=0.013), whereas non-DHGP but not R1 remained associated with worse prognosis in multivariate analysis. In patients with non-DHGP, R1 margin has no prognostic impact. In patients undergoing resection of CRLMs, the prognostic value of poor tumor biology, such as in patients with non-DHGP, exceeds that of surgical radicality.

Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma

Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma

Effect of Human Papillomavirus Subtype on the Rate of Positive Surgical Margin After Cervical Conization

Objective. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a risk factor for cervical carcinoma. Over 100 types of HPV have been identified. The excisional procedures are recommended for women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Surgical margin status is an important predictor of the risk of relapse. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether HPV genotype is a predictive factor of positive surgical margin after cervical cone excision. Materials and Methods. The records of 448 HPV-infected patients who underwent loop electrosurgical excision or cold knife conization at a tertiary gynecological cancer center were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 6 groups according to HPV positivity: HPV 16 only, HPV 18 only, HPV 16/18, other high-risk HPV (hrHPV), HPV 16/hrHPV, and HPV 18/hrHPV. Results. There was no significant difference between the HPV groups in terms of age, parity, menopausal status, endocervical canal involvement, conization method, and the rates of positive margin (P = .15, P = .49, P = .07, P = .20, P = .24, P = .39, respectively). Conclusion. The results show that HPV subtypes might not be associated with endocervical canal involvement and the rates of positive margin. In addition, margin status was not related to the conization method and the number of excised cervical tissue.

Addition of Postoperative Radiation Therapy After Preoperative Chemotherapy and Surgery in Patients With Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer Is Associated With Improved Outcomes

PurposeOur purpose was to examine outcomes of patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (PreCT) with/without postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy. A secondary analysis of down staging and margin clearance was made with reference to those receiving upfront surgery and then adjuvant chemotherapy (PostCT). Methods and MaterialsThe National Cancer Database was queried for FIGO (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage III/IV locally advanced endometrial cancer cases who underwent definitive surgery from 2010 to 2016 and received chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Cases were classified into 2 cohorts: preoperative chemotherapy +/- postoperative chemotherapy cohort (PreCT) and postoperative chemotherapy cohort (PostCT) for reference for margin assessment. Cases who received preoperative radiation therapy were excluded while those who received postoperative radiation were included in the analysis. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), surgical margin status, rate of downstaging, and effect of adjuvant radiation therapy on OS among the PreCT cohort. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression analyses were performed. ResultsA total of 13,369 cases were identified with 1059 in PreCT and 12,310 in PostCT cohorts. PreCT had lower OS than PostCT (UVA: hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P < .001; MVA: HR, 1.873; P < .001). PreCT cases with negative margins, who presumably had unresectable tumors initially, also had worse OS compared with PostCT with negative margins (UVA: HR, 2.20; P < .001; MVA: HR, 1.84; P < .001); however, PreCT with negative margins had similar survival to PostCT with positive margins (UVA: HR, 0.825; P < .001; MVA: P = .885). The addition of radiation after surgery in the PreCT cohort was associated with improved survival (5-year OS 20.5% compared with 50%, respectively; UVA: HR, 0.450; P < .001; MVA: HR, 0.337; P < .001). Although fewer cases in PreCT had negative margins compared with PostCT (72% compared with 84%, P < .001), approximately 19% of cases in PreCT had lower pathologic T-stage compared with clinical T-stage and 11% had lower N-stage. ConclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy was given in cases with worse oncologic prognostic factors, many of whom were likely unresectable at outset, compared with those who received postoperative chemotherapy. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with tumor downstaging, survival is lower than with primary surgery probably because of these baseline differences. The addition of adjuvant radiation after surgery in cases who received preoperative chemotherapy is associated with improved survival.

Prognostic factors in oral cancer surgery - results from a UK tertiary centre

IntroductionOral cancer surgery is complicated by the diverse nature of clinical and histopathological presentations that occur. Current National guidance recognises the significant role that surgical margin status plays in the overall survival of patients. Many other histopathological factors influence patient survival, the importance of which varies between the literature. Materials and methodsIn this prospective longitudinal study, all patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma who had primary surgical treatment under general anaesthesia were included. Surgery was performed by one surgical team within this tertiary referral centre. Patients were followed up for a maximum of 7 years following their surgery. ResultsA total of 250 patients were included from 2015 to 2022. Patients were 61.44 years old (SD 13.23) at diagnosis, and 56.4% were male (n = 141). Pathology was mainly pT1 (39.1%) and the most common sites were the border of tongue (31.2%) and floor of mouth (18.8%). 43.4% of patients had clear surgical margins, with overall survival being significantly associated with margin status (p = 0.0079). Extra-capsular spread was significantly associated with higher risk of death from metastatic head and neck cancer (p = 0.014), whereas presence of high-grade dysplasia at surgical margins and depth of invasion of tumour were not. ConclusionThis study has reinforced the importance of surgical margin clearance and as such the development of intra-operative techniques to ensure this is imperative. The significance of extra-capsular spread in survival has also been demonstrated. Discussion regarding the current deficiency in accurate pre-operative diagnostic methods for extra capsular spread is covered.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between endoscopic and laparoscopic resections in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

There are still clinical controversy on the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection (ER) and laparoscopic resection (LR) in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ER in the treatment of GISTs by comparing the relative outcomes of ER to LR. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched. Data were retrieved from January 2010 to January 2020 and subjected to a meta-analysis based on the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of ER and LR. The intervention arm was treated by LR while the comparator arm was treated by ER. Relevant literature was selected based on the inclusion criteria, data was extracted, and quality evaluation of the included literature was carried out. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied for assessing the quality of included studies. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochrane χ2 test and I2 statistic, and Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to detect publication bias. The present analysis included 13 studies, comprising a total of 1,261 patients, (ER vs. LR: 543 vs. 718). The incidence rate of postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR), 0.400; P=0.001] was significantly lower in the ER group [3.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.015 to 0.055] than the LR group (8.9%; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.17). The meta-analysis revealed that the recurrence rate following ER (1.7%; 95% CI, 0.005 to 0.033) was lower than that following LR (2.5%; 95% CI, 0.012 to 0.041). The R0 resection rate of ER (99%; 95% CI, 0.975 to 0.999) was similar to that of LR (100%; 95% CI, 0.995 to 1.000). No publication bias in this study (P>0.10), and the sensitivity analysis showed that the study was robust. ER was safer and more efficient than LR in terms of all the outcomes, except the R0 resection rate. Thus, ER should be considered the treatment of choice. However, attention should be paid to the surgical margin status following ER.

Treatment, Survival, and Demographics in Temporal Bone Malignancies: A Pooled Data Analysis.

Temporal bone malignancies are relatively uncommon tumors. Their location adjacent to vital structures such as the carotid artery, jugular vein, otic capsule, and temporal lobe can make their treatment potentially challenging. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes in temporal bone malignancies obtained via pooled literature data. The study sought to examine factors affecting survival in temporal bone malignancies based on the studies in the existing published literature. A systematic search was conducted on the PubMed (Medline), Embase, and Google Scholar databasesto identify relevant studies from 1951 to 2022 that described the treatment of temporal bone malignancies. Articles thatfulfilled the inclusion criteria were assessed and analyzed by the author. The literature search identified 5875 case series and case reports, and 161 of them contained sufficient data to be included in the pooled data analysis, involving a total of 825 patients.Multivariate analysis of the pooled literature data showed that overall stage, presence of facial palsy, and surgical margin status significantly affected overall survival (OS), while overall stage and presence of facial palsy significantly affected disease-free survival (DFS). To summarize, this study examined pooled survival data on demographics, treatment, and survival of patients with temporal bone malignancies utilizing an extensive literature-based pooled data meta-analysis. Overall stage, facial nerve status, and surgical margin status appeared tomost strongly affect survival in patients with temporal bone malignancies.

Association of Surgical Margin Status with Oncologic Outcome in Patients Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgery

We aimed to compare the prognosis of patients with close resection margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with that of patients with negative margins and identified predictors of residual disease. A total of 542 patients with breast cancer who underwent BCS between 2003 and 2019 were selected and divided into the close margin (114 patients) and negative margin (428 patients) groups. The median follow-up period was 72 (interquartile range, 42-113) months. Most patients received radiation therapy (RTx) and systemic therapy according to their stage and molecular subtype. The 10-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rates of the close and negative margin groups were 88.2% and 95.5%, respectively (p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that adjuvant RTx and margin status after definitive surgery were significantly associated with locoregional recurrence. Of the 57 patients who underwent re-excision, 34 (59.6%) had residual disease. Multivariable analysis revealed that a histological type of positive or close margins and multifocality were independent predictive factors for residual disease. Although the current guidelines suggest that no ink on tumor is an adequate margin after BCS, a close resection margin may be associated with locoregional failure. The treatment strategy for close resection margins after BCS should be based on individual clinicopathological features.