Visualization Of Surgical Field Research Articles

Impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and deep neuromuscular blockade on surgeon satisfaction and patient outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients: A prospective randomised controlled study.

The impact of laparoscopic surgery on homeostatic systems necessitates careful consideration of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) management. This study investigated the effects of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on surgeon satisfaction, haemodynamics and post-operative outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. The study design involves prospective randomised control. Ninety patients were assigned to low (7-10 mmHg, n = 45) or normal (12-16 mmHg, n = 45) IAP groups. Deep NMB, guided by train-of-four monitoring, was administered. This study evaluated surgical rating scale scores, haemodynamics and post-operative outcomes through a literature review. A computer programme (IBM, SPSS) was used for statistical analysis. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyse patients' IAP levels, additional NMB requirements, surgical rating scale scores and numerical rating scales. Patient demographics and other intraoperative and post-operative variables were analysed with Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Values of P < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. No significant demographic differences were observed. The low-pressure group exhibited lower post-operative pain (P < 0.01) and reduced analgesia requirements (P = 0.00). On analysis of the surgeon rating scale, no disparities were evident between the groups. NMB usage correlated with height and weight (P < 0.01). Heart rate showed no intergroup differences. The MAP measured after 15 min was lower in Group L, and the difference was significant (P = 0.023). The SAP measured after 30 min was lower in Group L, and the difference was significant (P = 0.017). Blood gas values and surgical field visibility were unaffected by the IAP. The positive correlations between NMB, height and weight aligned with previous research. This study highlights successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy under low IAP, deep NMB and favourable post-operative outcomes. Despite these limitations, the findings contribute to optimising laparoscopic surgical approaches.

Effectiveness of Mechanical Bowel Preparation before Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial

Objective: The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the effect of bowel preparation using only oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte (PEG) solution versus oral PEG solution combined with mechanical sodium phosphate (NaP) enema on the surgical field visualization in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Methods: Participants were randomized to either a single oral PEG solution or an oral PEG solution combined by mechanical NaP enema. The intraoperative visualization of the surgical field, the ease of manipulation of the bowels, and overall difficulty level of the surgery were evaluated by the surgeon using a self-administered questionnaire. After the surgery, the patients completed a survey assessing postoperative gastrointestinal discomfort. Results: A total of 114 women were enrolled and randomized to oral PEG solution-only group (n = 48), and oral PEG plus mechanical NaP enema group (n = 66). Forty-two women in oral PEG-only group and 59 oral PEG plus NaP enema group completed the study. There was no difference in intraoperative visualization or overall difficulty of the operation between the two groups, and bowel manipulation was easier in the oral PEG-only group. Also, there was no difference in operating time between the groups. The patients’ level of gastrointestinal discomfort after the surgery was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Routine use of mechanical NaP enema before robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery is not recommended, because it has no additional benefit regarding intraoperative visualization or the surgical level of difficulty over oral bowel preparation methods.

Dexmedetomidine versus labetalol for induced hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blind study

Background &amp; Objective: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a surgical procedure for treating sinus diseases. Bleeding is a common concern during FESS, so maintaining hemodynamic stability and ensuring quality surgical field visibility is crucial for achieving the best outcomes. The present study compared the time taken to achieve target mean arterial pressure (MAP) when using dexmedetomidine or labetalol during FESS and assessed the quality of the surgical field to establish the better choice of the two. Methodology: The study was conducted as a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study. Sixty patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II, undergoing FESS under general anesthesia, were divided into two groups, each with 30 patients. Group D patients received dexmedetomidine and Group L received labetalol. The study aimed to maintain the mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 60-70 mmHg. The operative field visibility was assessed using the Fromme and Boezaart scoring system. Emergence time and postoperative first analgesic request time were also recorded. Results: The time taken to achieve target MAP (60-70 mmHg) was less in Group D (15.1 ± 0.2 min) than in Group L (18.2 ± 0.5 min), and it was statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05). Although insignificant, lower MAP were observed in the Group D than Group L. A significantly lower heart rate was observed at defined intervals in Group D than in Group L. The visibility of the surgical field in both groups has comparable results. The first analgesic request time was considerably longer in Group D (52.2 ± 1.9) compared to Group L (10.2 ± 2.1) (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine provided better hemodynamic stability and operative field visibility than Labetalol during FESS. Abbreviations: FESS - Functional endoscopic sinus surgery; MAP - Mean arterial pressure; EtCO2 - end-tidal carbon dioxide Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; Labetalol; Controlled Hypotension; Mean Arterial Pressure Citation: Gupta S, Yadav I, Saxena A, Bagla RK, Nazir N. Dexmedetomidine versus labetalol for induced hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):652−657; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2507 Received: May 19, 2024; Reviewed: June 08, 2024; Accepted: June 08, 2024

Comparing the hemodynamic changes, bleeding, and surgeon’s satisfaction during rhinoplasty surgery by use of two drugs, labetalol and dexmedetomidine added to anesthetic technique: a randomized clinical trial

Background: Rhinoplasty is a common surgery in the world. Bleeding is a common concern during rhinoplasty. Hemodynamic stability and quality of view of the surgical field help to achieve the best results. The aim was to compare the effect of two drugs, dexmedetomidine and labetalol, on the amount of bleeding and satisfaction with rhinoplasty surgery. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study includes candidates for rhinoplasty surgery, referring to Moradi Hospital in Rafsanjan. Twenty patients were assigned to each group (dexmedetomidine and labetalol) based on the entry and exit criteria. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and mean arterial pressure were measured before, 20 minutes after complete anesthesia, and the start of rhinoplasty surgery. All patients were operated by the same surgeon using the same technique. The surgeon’s level of satisfaction indicated with the field of vision is given as follows: good, moderate, and poor. Results: The study was performed on 40 subjects in two groups (n = 20), of which 14 (35 %) were male and 26 (65 %) were female. The results presented statistically significant differences in mean osteotomy systolic blood pressure (P = 0.018), osteotomy diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.015), mean osteotomy arterial pressure (P = 0.002), after 20 minutes heart rate (P &lt; 0.001), and osteotomy heart rate (P = 0.001) between two groups. Furthermore, significant differences were observed regarding systolic blood pressure (P = 0.015), mean arterial pressure (P = 0.03), and heart rate (P &lt; 0.001) after controlling for the effect of the group. Conclusions: The labetalol is the preferred option for controlling hypotension that provides better surgical field visibility compared to dexmedetomidine in rhinoplasty surgery.

Reduced-port robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with optimized surgical field deployment: early results of single-site plus-two ports method

BackgroundThe adoption of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasing globally. Meanwhile, reduced-port RPD (RPRPD) remains uncommon, requiring robot-specific techniques not possible with laparoscopy. We introduce a unique RPRPD technique optimizing surgical field exposure.MethodsOur RPRPD utilizes a single-site plus-two ports technique, facilitated by a single-port platform through a 5-cm incision. The configuration of robotic arms (arm1, arm2, arm3, and arm4) were strategically designed for optimal procedural efficiency, with the arms2 and arm3, alongside the assistant trocar, mounted on the single-port platform, while the arms1 and arm4 were positioned laterally across the abdomen. Drainage was established via channels created at the arm1 and arm4 insertion sites. A “gooseneck traction” was principally employed with the robotic instrument to prop up the specimen rather than grasp, improving the surgical field’s visibility and access. Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RPRPD performed between August 2020 and September 2023 by a single surgeon across two centers in Taiwan and Japan were reviewed.ResultsFifty patients underwent RPRPD using the single-site plus-two ports technique. The gooseneck traction technique enabled goodsurgical field deployment and allowed for unrestricted movement of robotic arms with no collisions with the assistant instruments. The median operative time was 351 min (250–488 min), including 271 min (219–422 min) of console time and three minutes (2–10 min) of docking time. The median estimated blood loss was 80 mL (1–872 mL). All RPRPD procedures were successfully performed without the need for conversion to open surgery. Postoperative major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) was observed in 6 (12%) patients and median postoperative hospital stay was 13 days.ConclusionsThe single-site plus-two ports RPRPD with the gooseneck traction proves to be a safe, feasible option, facilitating surgical field visibility and robotic arm maneuverability.Graphical

Anesthetic recovery outcomes after 2 methods of nasal mucosal preparation for endoscopic sinus surgery

PurposeOur institution uses two approaches for nasal mucosal preparation during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) to improve surgical field visualization: topical epinephrine (TE) versus topical cocaine with injection of lidocaine containing epinephrine (TCLE). We aimed to compare anesthetic outcomes after ESS using these techniques. Methods and materialsWe retrospectively identified adult patients at our institution who underwent ESS from May 2018 through January 2023 under general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil infusions. Postoperative anesthetic outcomes, including pain and recovery time, were compared between patients who had mucosal preparation with TE versus TCLE using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for potential confounders. ResultsAmong 1449 patients who underwent ESS, 585 had TE, and 864 had TCLE. Compared with TE, during anesthetic recovery, the TCLE group had fewer episodes of severe pain (numeric pain score ≥ 7) (IPTW-adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.49–0.85; P = .002), less opioid analgesic administration (IPTW-adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95 % CI, 0.44–0.69; P < .001), and shorter recovery room stay (IPTW-adjusted ratio of the geometric mean, 0.90; 95 % CI, 0.85–0.96; P = .002). Postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative sedation were similar between groups. ConclusionsPatients who received preparation of the nasal mucosa with TCLE, compared with TE, were less likely to report severe pain or receive an opioid analgesic in the postanesthesia recovery room and had faster anesthetic recovery. This observation from our large clinical practice indicates that use topical and local anesthetic during endoscopic sinus surgery may have benefit for ambulatory ESS patients.

Dexmedetomidine and surgical field visibility in nasal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nasal and sinus surgery, especially using endoscopy, relies upon adequate haemostasis to be safe and effective. Often other haemostatic methods, such as cautery are not viable, and other methods must be employed. This study examines the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in controlled hypotension and for surgical field visibility in endoscopic sinus surgery and other nasal surgeries. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Central for randomised controlled trials using dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension in adult patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery or other nasal surgery. Meta-analysis of mean differences and single means were performed. Of 935 identified studies, 31 met the inclusion criteria. A statistically significant difference in Fromme-Boezaart surgical field visibility scores was found comparing dexmedetomidine to placebo (p < 0.00001) and propofol (p < 0.0001), but not other agents. A significant difference in intraoperative blood loss volume was found compared with placebo (51.5mL, p < 0.00001) and propofol (13.6mL, p < 0.0001), but not other agents. Dexmedetomidine demonstrated significantly improved surgical field visibility and blood loss volume compared with placebo and propofol, but not other agents. Dexmedetomidine is viable and useful for controlled hypotension in nasal surgery. Choice of controlled hypotension agent should follow patient and procedure-specific considerations.

Efficacy of Pre-emptive Infiltration of Dexmedetomidine with a Local Anaesthetic on Postoperative Pain in Maxillofacial Trauma Management under General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Study.

Pre-emptive analgesia aims to reduce post-operative pain and the need for analgesics. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist with sedative and analgesic properties. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of pre-emptive infiltration of DEX combined with local anaesthetic (2% lignocaine with adrenaline) in managing post-operative pain in maxillofacial trauma patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation procedures, as compared to pre-emptive infiltration of placebo (saline) with the same local anaesthetic. Forty-two participants of maxillofacial trauma with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of more than 4 were included in this double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Group DL (Dexmedetomidine with local anaesthetic) received dexmedetomidine (DEX) with local anaesthesia while group PL (placebo with local anaesthetic) received placebo with local anaesthesia. Participants were evaluated for the time taken for the first rescue analgesic, total doses of fentanyl taken by the patient in the first 24 h, post-operative pain (VAS) at 6, 12, 16 and 24 h, post-operative side effects and analysed. The DL group had a significantly longer time to first rescue analgesic compared to the PL group. Surgeons in the DL group reported higher satisfaction and better surgical field visibility. Post-operative VAS scores were lower in the DL group at 6 and 12 h, with a median score of 1 at 16 and 24 h. Pre-emptive DEX infiltration is effective in reducing post-operative pain and opioid consumption in maxillofacial trauma cases undergoing open reduction and internal fixation. This approach can enhance patient comfort and improve surgical outcomes without significant risks.

Effects of Tranexamic Acid on Intraoperative Bleeding and Surgical Field Visualization During Middle Ear Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic agent widely used in several surgical procedures to reduce intraoperative bleeding. Intraoperative bleeding is a crucial problem for the ear surgeon, as it prevents good visualization of the surgical field. The aim of this work was to analyze the relevant literature about the use of tranexamic acid in ear surgery. A literature search was conducted in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement, across 3 databases (Medline, Cochrane, and Google Scholar), with the terms "tranexamic acid," and "ear," and "surgery." Three prospective, randomized, and double-blind clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Studies were not able to be pooled because of heterogeneity in material, methods of delivery and evaluation, and procedures used. Despite these limitations, all 3 papers found a significant reduction in intraoperative bleeding, allowing a better visualization of the operating field. Despite the scarcity of published trials, tranexamic acid is safe and seems to be useful in reducing intraoperative bleeding in ear surgery, thus improving operative field visualization.

Laparoscopic drainage versus interventional radiology for management of appendicular abscess: a randomized controlled trial

Background Laparoscopic drainage of appendicular abscess has become a novel technique due to its advantages over interventional radiology like a complete exploration of the abdomen, exclusion of other pathologies, excision of the appendix at the same session, better cosmesis, decreased incidence of wound infection, better visualization of surgical field, fine handling of edematous tissue and drainage of multiple collections. Patients and methods This randomized controlled clinical trial included all patients who developed the manifestations of appendicular abscess and were referred to the Zagazig University Hospital Emergency Department between January 2020 and February 2022. The study was prospectively approved by the Zagazig University Faculty of Medicine Institutional Review Board (Approval Number: 9871/26-9-2022), and was retrospectively submitted to clinicaltrials.gov in June 2022 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05419440). The sample size was 172 patients divided into two equal groups, a laparoscopic group involved 86 patients (group 1) and an interventional radiology group involved 86 patients (group 2). Results Group 1 (laparoscopic drainage group) included 86 patients: 55.8% were males, with a mean age of 41.2 SD 12.2 years-old, while group 2 (interventional radiology group) included 86 patients: 51.2% were males, with a mean age of 36.8 SD 10.9 years-old. The incidence of reported complications in group (1) was 1 (1.2%) for bowel injury, 3 (3.5%) for fecal fistula, 0 (0%) for recurrence, 0 (0%) for pelvic collection and 0 (0%) for mortality while in group (2) were 5 (5.8%) for bowel injury, 0 (0%) for fecal fistula, 3 (3.5%) for recurrence, 8 (9.3%) for pelvic collection and 1 (1.2%). The incidence rates of quality of life in group (1) were 48 (55.8%) for excellent quality of life, 38 (44.2%) for good quality of life and 0 (0%) for poor quality of life, unlike group (2), the incidence rates of quality of life were 12 (14%) for excellent quality of life, 59 (68.6%) for good quality of life and 15 (17.4%) for poor quality of life. Conclusion Laparoscopic management of appendicular abscess was safely applied in a good experienced hand without the need for interval appendectomy.

Transduodenal robotic ampullectomy: tips and tricks and strategies for postoperative duodenal fistula management (with video).

Transduodenal Ampullectomy (TA) is a procedure for resecting low-malignancy ampullary tumors, with postoperative fistula as a notable complication. This study aims to clarify the indications for TA, outline the surgical robotic technique, and emphasize the importance of comprehensive complication management alongside the surgical approach. This multimedia article provides a detailed exposition of the robotic TA surgical technique, including the most important steps involved in exposing and reimplanting biliary and pancreatic ducts. The procedure encompasses the mobilization of the hepatic flexure of the colon, an extensive Kocher maneuver for duodenal mobilization, and ampulla exposure through a duodenal incision. Employing retraction loop sutures enhances surgical field visibility. Reconstruction involves securing pancreatic and biliary ducts to the duodenal mucosa, each tutored with a silicon catheter, and suturing for ampullectomy completion. The total operative time was 380min. Final histopathology disclosed high-grade dysplasia with an isolated focus of adenocarcinoma (pT1), accompanied by clear resection margins. A postoperative duodenal fistula occurred, managed successfully through conservative treatment, utilizing subcutaneous drainage. Despite accurate robotic TA execution, complications may arise. This study underscores the importance of a comprehensive approach, incorporating meticulous surgical technique and effective complication management, to optimize patient outcomes.

Does Tranexamic Acid Reduce the Need for Hypotensive Anesthesia Within Orthognathic Surgery? A Retrospective Study.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is utilized frequently in orthognathic surgery to limit blood loss and improve surgical field visualization. This antifibrinolytic has been proven effective with use of concomitant hypotensive anesthesia. Despite proven efficacy, there is a recent push to avoid perioperative hypotensive anesthesia due to risks of organ hypoperfusion, cardiac ischemia and postoperative nausea. The aim is to study the efficacy and safety of utilizing TXA without controlled hypotensive anesthesia. The authors identified two cohorts of subjects that underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery both with and without TXA administration and compared operative and perioperative variables. A retrospective analysis was completed evaluating intraoperative MAP measurements in subjects treated both with and without TXA using descriptive and bivariate analysis. Sixty-three subjects met inclusion criteria. The TXA cohort experienced 11.5% less time under hypotensive anesthesia when compared to the group that did not receive TXA. Additionally, surgical length was decreased by more than 28min when subjects received TXA. No subjects required a blood transfusion or experienced any TXA-related complications. Given the recommendations to limit hypotensive anesthesia perioperatively, TXA is a useful adjunct in orthognathic surgery to limit controlled hypotensive anesthesia.

Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed via three different techniques, conventional, on-pump beating heart CABG (ONBHCAB), or off-pump CABG (OPCAB), data are limited to compare ONBHCAB with OPCAB. We retrospectively investigated the postoperative cardiac biomarkers, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and troponin I (cTnI), and early and late outcomes in 806 patients undergoing isolated ONBHCAB or OPCAB between February 2008 and September 2022. To eliminate the bias between different groups, propensity score matching was conducted to validate the findings. After matching, the number of each study group totaled 270 patients. In both complete and matched cohorts, early outcomes, including morbidities and mortalities, were similar. However, cTnI and CK-MB levels were significantly higher after ONBHCAB than after OPCAB with median peak cTnI of 9.85 versus 4.60 ng/mL and median peak CK-MB of 48.45 versus 17.10 ng/mL in the matched cohort, which were quite low, below the threshold for values defining perioperative myocardial infarction. At follow-up of 73 ± 45 months, the overall actuarial survival rates were similar between the ONBHCAB and OPCAB patients (86 vs. 87% at 5 years and 64 vs. 68% at 10 years, respectively, in the matched cohort). ONBHCAB may be a comparable alternative to OPCAB with similar early and late outcomes, despite higher elevation of postoperative cardiac biomarkers. ONBHCAB provides more efficient hemodynamic support, providing a better surgical visual field, than OPCAB while reducing the risk of incomplete revascularization.

”The efficacy of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in functional endoscopic sinus surgery”. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial

ABSTRACT Background Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a common procedure for the treatment of chronic sinusitis and minimal bleeding inside the narrow surgical field affects the surgical visualization, prolongs operative time, and increases ocular and intracranial injuries. Our study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous Tranexamic acid on surgical field bleeding in endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods A prospective, randomized, controlled trial enrolled 159 participants (ASA I-II, both sex and age 18–40 years) undergoing FESS who were equally randomized into 3 groups. Group O received 2 gm of TXA orally 2 hours before surgery, Group I received 15 mg/kg of IV TXA slowly after induction of anesthesia, and Group C didn’t receive any. Intraoperative surgical field bleeding was assessed by the Wormald grading scale and Surgeon satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale. At 24 hours post-operatively, the incidence of nasal bleeding, PONV, and D-dimer level were recorded. Results Showed significantly higher surgical field score, duration of surgery, recovery time, and postoperative (24 hours) D-dimer in group-C (p-value <0.001) with no difference between groups-I and O, while surgeon satisfaction was significantly lower in group-C (p-value <0.001) with no difference between groups-I and O. No differences regarding hemodynamic parameters, postoperative bleeding, pain, and PONV were found. Conclusions Oral TXA was safe, cheap, and as effective as IV TXA regarding surgical field visualization, surgeon satisfaction, and operative time during FESS; with limited adverse effects and no evidence of thromboembolic complications.

Sphenopalatine ganglion block with lidocaine versus bupivacaine for optimizing intraoperative bleeding and surgical field visibility during endoscopic septoplasty: a randomized double-blind controlled trial

Background &amp; objective: The benefits of sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) block during endoscopic septoplasty are yet unclear due to a lack of adequate data. We investigated the efficacy of SPG block (SPGB) with lidocaine versus bupivacaine for minimizing intraoperative bleeding and providing a bloodless surgical field in patients having endoscopic septoplasty under general anesthesia. Methodology: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with ASA I and II were scheduled for endoscopic septoplasty. Following standard general anesthesia, patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Group C (n = 20): SPGB was performed using normal saline in the control group; Group L (n = 20); patients received SPGB with 2% lidocaine, and Group B (n = 20); patients received SPGB with 0.5% bupivacaine. Intraoperative blood loss, surgical field quality, postoperative pain-free duration, postoperative analgesic requirements, and the patient satisfaction were recorded. The collected data were verified, coded by the researcher, and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM-SPSS/PC/VER 21). Statistical analysis was done with the Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way ANOVA test and two-way repeated measure ANOVA test as required. The Kaplan–Meier curve was plotted to explore the differences in the post-operative pain-free durations among the studied groups using the log-rank test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The intraoperative blood loss and surgical field grading were lower in the groups treated with lidocaine (44.9 ± 3.7 ml, P &lt; 0.001) or bupivacaine (41.4 ± 2.9 ml, P &lt; 0.001) in comparison to the control group (89.95 ± 7.8 ml). There was no difference between the two groups. Postoperative meperidine requirement in 24 h was higher in the control group (36.25 ± 2.9 mg) than the lidocaine group (18.75 ± 2.5 mg; P &lt; 0.001) and the bupivacaine group (16.25 ± 2.7 mg; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with bupivacaine or lidocaine decreased intraoperative blood loss and improved surgical field visibility compared to placebo during endoscopic septoplasty under general anesthesia. There were statistically no significant differences in sphenopalatine ganglion blocks with either lidocaine or bupivacaine. Abbreviations: SPG- Sphenopalatine Ganglion; SPGB- Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block; VAS- Visual Analog Scale Keywords: Bupivacaine; Endoscopic Septoplasty; Lidocaine; Postoperative Analgesia; Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Citation: Ghazaly HF, Khalefa MM, Sedeek MA, Hasanen MK. Sphenopalatine ganglion block with lidocaine versus bupivacaine for optimizing intraoperative bleeding and surgical field visibility during endoscopic septoplasty: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(1):92-99; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i1.2393 Received: August 29, 2023; Reviewed: December 29, 2023; Accepted: December 31, 2023

Dexmedetomidine supplementation for surgical field enhancement in endonasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dexmedetomidine has been shown to effectively control intraoperative bleeding and improve surgical field visualization. However, its value in endonasal surgeries remains a matter of debate. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies comparing dexmedetomidine with placebo in endonasal surgeries. Outcomes included bleeding, operative time (OT), surgeon’s satisfaction, postoperative pain (POP), and nausea/vomiting (PONV). For statistical analysis, we used RevMan 5.4.1, and assessed heterogeneity with I2 statistics. We included a total of 1386 patients from 22 studies. In the placebo group, there was higher bleeding volume, whereas the dexmedetomidine group showed lower scores on the Fromme-Boezaart scale. Additionally, the surgeon satisfaction risk ratio (RR) increased, and OT was reduced in the dexmedetomidine group. The dexmedetomidine group had lower incidences of POP and PONV. In endonasal surgeries, dexmedetomidine was associated with improvements in surgical field visualization as evidenced by reduced intraoperative bleeding and postoperative morbidities.

Effects of propofol versus sevoflurane on surgical field visibility during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized trial

BackgroundDuring arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), clear surgical field visibility (SFV) is the basis of successful surgery, but the choice of anesthesia maintenance drugs may have different effects on SFV. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of propofol- and sevoflurane-based general anesthesia on SFV in patients undergoing ARCR.MethodsPatients (n = 130) undergoing elective ARCR in the lateral decubitus position were randomized into either the propofol group or sevoflurane group (65 per group). The duration of surgery and increased pressure irrigation (IPI), Boezaart score, rocuronium consumption and usage of remifentanil were recorded. The time of both spontaneous respiration recovery and extubation and the incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting and agitation were also recorded.ResultsThe Boezaart score, duration of IPI and ratio of the duration of IPI to the duration of surgery (IPI/S ratio) were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). Rocuronium consumption, number of patients requiring remifentanil infusion and total remifentanil consumption were significantly lower in the sevoflurane group (P < 0.05). The spontaneous respiration recovery time was significantly longer in the propofol group (P < 0.05), but there were no differences in the extubation time between the groups(P > 0.05).ConclusionsCompared with propofol, sevoflurane provides equally clear SFV while improving the convenience of anesthesia maintenance in ARCR patients with interscalene plexus (ISB) combined with general anesthesia.Trial registrationThis single-center, prospective, RCT was retrospective registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number ChiCTR2300072110 (02/06/2023).

Efficacy of Magnesium Sulphate and Dexmedetomidine in Controlled Hypotension for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomised Clinical Study

Introduction: The treatment of nasal sinus diseases with Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) is a wellestablished and popular method. This procedure is performed under general anaesthesia or local anaesthesia. Intentional induction of hypotension has helped limit intraoperative blood loss. A bloodless surgical field improves visibility and lowers the possibility of damaging nearby structures, achieved by reducing the baseline Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) by 30% or maintaining MAP at 60-70 mmHg. Aim: To compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulphate (MgSO4 ) in producing hypotensive anaesthesia during FESS. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical study was conducted at BLDE Shri BM Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India, from January 2021 to July 2022. In this study, 70 patients, aged 18 to 60 years of either sex, admitted for FESS surgeries under general anaesthesia with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Grade 1 and 2 were randomly divided into two groups: 35 patients in the dexmedetomidine group and 35 patients in the MgSO4 group. Dexmedetomidine was given to group D as a loading dose of 1 µg/kg, followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/h, and MgSO4 was given to group M as a loading dosage of 40 mg/kg, followed by an infusion of 15 mg/kg/h. MAP was kept above 65 mmHg during induced hypotension. Parameters studied included Heart Rate (HR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), MAP. Data was analysed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics Software Version 23.0. A p-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The demographic profiles regarding age, gender, ASA grade, and duration of surgery in both groups were comparable and showed no significant differences. At 30 minutes of surgery, MAP in group D was found to be statistically lower than that in group M with a p-value of 0.0001. Dexmedetomidine induced a significant reduction in HR, which was statistically validated with a p-value of 0.004 at 15 minutes. A statistically significant reduction in MAP was found in group D compared to group M at the time of intubation and later at 10 minutes (p-value=0.005) and 15 minutes (p-value=0.006). Conclusion: The target MAP of 60-70 mmHg or a 30% reduction from the baseline MAP was achieved significantly earlier in group D as compared with group M. Group D had lower infusion dosages, better surgical field visibility, and caused less bleeding. The dexmedetomidine group experienced extended sedation and postoperative recovery

Deep neuromuscular blocking and sugammadex reversing-drug is an efficient strategy permitting successful laparoscopic surgery under low insufflation pressure: Prospective multicenter study

ABSTRACT Objectives To compare using deep neuromuscular blockade during low abdominal insufflation pressure (DNMB/LAIP; n = 67) to conventional blockade and pressure (CNMB/CAIP; n = 68) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to evaluate the speed and efficacy of NMB recovery using sugammadex (SGX) as assessed by the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale. Patients & Methods Rocuronium initiation and maintenance doses were 0.6 and 0.15 mg/Kg, respectively, and neostigmine or SGX was used as reverse agent for CNMB and DNMB, respectively. Abdominal insufflation was terminated at 15 and 8-mmHg, for CAIP and LAIP, respectively. The study outcome is the surgical feasibility under DNMB/LAIP, as judged by the frequency of shift-to-CAIP, surgical field visibility and operative time. Results The frequency of shift-to-CAIP was 2.9% due to surgeons’ inconvenience of LAIP. DNMB allowed significant control of intraoperative (IO) hemodynamic response to surgical manipulations. SGX allowed 3.2 times faster NMB-reversal with significantly higher percentages of patients returned to baseline physiologic statuses. The percentage of patients free of pain and nausea was significantly higher after DNMB/LAIP. At hospital discharge and day-7 PO, 86.6% and 98.5% of patients regained normalcy of their overall perspectives after DNMB/LAIP with a significant difference than after CNMB/CIAP. At 2-week PO, the frequency of shoulder-tip pain (STP) was significantly lower and surgeons’ satisfaction rate was significantly with DNMB/LAIP. Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under DNMB/LAIP procedure is feasible and safe with lower incidence and severity of STP and high surgeons’ satisfaction. Sugammadex hastened the recovery of DNMB 3.2 times that of neostigmine-induced recovery of CNMB. Registration NO: RC.3.9.2023

Effect of Induced Hypotensive Anesthesia and Normotensive Anesthesia on Intraoperative Blood Loss During Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Orthognathic surgery involves significant bleeding from both soft tissues and bones due to rich blood supply to areas involved. In addition, limited access along with poor visibility and difficulty to isolate or ligate adds to the problem of bleeding during surgery. As a result, to counter drawbacks of intraoperative bleeding, method of induced hypotension stands out. Hypotensive anesthesia is a method through which blood pressure is decreased in a controlled manner. Various studies have been conducted that compared multiple methods to reduce intraoperative blood loss and improve visibility of surgical field. Hence, need for a systematic review to study the effects of hypotensive anesthesia on intraoperative blood loss, duration of the surgery and quality of surgical field. An electronic search was conducted to cumulate data from PubMed, Google scholar and institutional library from 2000 to 2020. In addition, bibliographies of included studies were hand searched to identify potentially eligible studies to append to the data and reach a conclusion. Comparative study of the data available indicates that controlled hypotension during general anesthesia is safe for young healthy patients undergoing orthognathic surgeries. This information could be of key importance to aid in reducing intraoperative blood loss and which improves the observability of the surgical field; lessen the chances of need for blood transfusion; and eventually shorten the length of stay in hospital.