Lung Cancer Surgery Research Articles

Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Early Mortality Following Lung Cancer Surgery

Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is associated with gains in health insurance coverage, earlier stage diagnosis, and improved survival among patients with cancer. To examine the association of Medicaid expansion with changes in early mortality among adults undergoing surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a setting in which access to care is a major determinant of survival. This cohort study used the National Cancer Database to identify 14 984 adults 45 to 64 years of age who underwent surgical resection of NSCLC between 2008 and 2019. Analysis was conducted between March 28, 2021, and September 1, 2023. State of residence Medicaid expansion status. Descriptive statistics were used to compare study population characteristics by Medicaid expansion status of patients' state of residence. Difference-in-differences analyses were used to evaluate the association between Medicaid expansion and postoperative mortality before implementation of the ACA (2008-2013) vs after (2014-2019). Among 14 984 adults included, the mean (SD) age was 56.3 (5.1) years, 54.6% were women, and 62.1% lived in Medicaid expansion states. Both 30-day (from 0.97% to 0.26%) and 90-day (from 2.63% to 1.32%) postoperative mortality decreased from before the ACA to after among patients residing in Medicaid expansion states (both P < .001) but not in nonexpansion states (30-day mortality before the ACA, 0.75% vs after the ACA, 0.68%; P = .74; and 90-day mortality before the ACA, 2.43% vs after the ACA, 2.20%; P = .57), leading to a difference-in-differences of -0.64 percentage points (95% CI, -1.19 to -0.08; P = .03) for 30-day mortality and -1.08 percentage points (95% CI, -2.08 to -0.08; P = .03) for 90-day mortality. The difference-in-differences for in-hospital mortality was not significant (P = .34) between expansion states (1.41% before the ACA to 0.77% after the ACA; 0.63 percentage point decrease; P = .004) and nonexpansion states (1.49% before the ACA to 1.20% after the ACA; 0.30 percentage point decrease; P = .29). In this cohort study of patients with NSCLC, Medicaid expansion was associated with declines in 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality following hospital discharge. These findings suggest that Medicaid expansion may be an effective strategy for improving access to care and cancer outcomes in this population.

Favourable surgical outcomes for either second primary lung cancer or intrapulmonary metastasis after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Metachronous lung cancer arising after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer is either a second primary lung cancer (SPLC) or intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) of the initial lung cancer; however, differential diagnosis is difficult. We evaluated the surgical outcomes of metachronous lung cancer in a combined population of patients with SPLC and IPM. A retrospective study of 3534 consecutive patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer between 1992 and 2016 was conducted at 4 institutions. A total of 105 patients (66 males; median age, 70 years) who underwent a second pulmonary resection for metachronous lung cancer were included. Most patients (81%) underwent sublobar resection, and there was no 30-day mortality. All metachronous lung cancers were cN0, 5 were pN1-2. The postoperative comprehensive histologic assessment revealed SPLC (n = 77) and IPM (n = 28). The 5-year overall survival rate after the second resection was 70.6% (median follow-up: 69.7 months). A multivariable analysis showed that age >70 years at the second resection (P = 0.013), male sex (P = 0.003), lymph node involvement in metachronous cancer (P < 0.001), pathological invasive size of metachronous cancer >15 mm (P < 0.001) and overlapping squamous cell carcinoma histology of the initial and metachronous cancers (P = 0.003) were significant prognostic factors for poor survival after the second resection, whereas histological IPM was not (P = 0.065). Surgery for cN0 metachronous lung cancer is safe and shows good outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in the SPLC and IPM results. Caution should be exercised when operating on patients with overlapping squamous cell carcinoma.

Ready to Go Home? Nurses' Perspectives of Prolonged Admission for Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Denmark.

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs with median postoperative hospitalization of 2 days improve outcomes after lung cancer surgery. This article explores nursing care practices for patients with lung cancer who remain hospitalized despite having recovered somatically. Qualitative focus group interviews were conducted with 16 nurses. Ricoeur's phenomenological hermeneutics underpins the methodology applied in this study, and we relied on Benner and Wrubel's theory. The nurses emphasized that the thoughts of patients with a recent lung cancer diagnosis revolve around more than the surgery. Nursing comprises not only practicalities but also attending to patients' stress and their coping with being struck with lung cancer and having undergone surgery. A counterculture emerged to counteract the logic of productivity, indicating that caring as a worthy end in itself may be underestimated in protocol-driven care. Prolonging hospitalization largely depends on clinical judgment. The nurses' aim is not to keep patients in the hospital but to avoid any needless suffering, allowing them to reclaim the primacy of caring.

Pleural Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Maximum Standardized Uptake Value as Predictive Indicators of Visceral Pleural Invasion in Clinical T1N0M0 Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Visceral pleural invasion (VPI) is a poor prognostic factor that contributes to the upstaging of early lung cancers. However, the preoperative assessment of VPI presents challenges. This study was conducted to examine intraoperative pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (pCEA) level and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as predictive markers of VPI in patients with clinical T1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma. A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of 613 patients who underwent intraoperative pCEA sampling and lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Of these, 390 individuals with clinical stage I adenocarcinoma and tumors ≤30 mm were included. Based on computed tomography findings, these patients were divided into pleural contact (n=186) and non-pleural contact (n=204) groups. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to analyze the association between pCEA and SUVmax in relation to VPI. Additionally, logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for VPI in each group. ROC curve analysis revealed that pCEA level greater than 2.565 ng/mL (area under the curve [AUC]=0.751) and SUVmax above 4.25 (AUC=0.801) were highly predictive of VPI in patients exhibiting pleural contact. Based on multivariable analysis, pCEA (odds ratio [OR], 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-7.87; p=0.026) and SUVmax (OR, 5.25; 95% CI, 1.90-14.50; p=0.001) were significant risk factors for VPI in the pleural contact group. In patients with clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting pleural contact, pCEA and SUVmax are potential predictive indicators of VPI. These markers may be helpful in planning for lung cancer surgery.

Reliability and validity analyses of the postoperative comfort scale for patients with lung cancer undergoing endoscopic surgery and an evaluation of patient comfort.

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours that threaten human health globally. Radical resection under thoracoscopic guidance has been accepted as the major therapeutic option for treating lung cancer clinically. However, the procedure still has some adverse impacts on the comfort of patients following thoracoscopic surgery. To analyse the reliability and validity of the postoperative comfort scale for patients with lung cancer undergoing endoscopic surgery and to evaluate patient comfort. With 210 patients with lung cancer undergoing endoscopic surgery as the participants, this study was performed to assess the reliability and validity of the postoperative comfort scale for patients with lung cancer undergoing endoscopic surgery, with the assessment performed by eight experts. The postoperative comfort scale included 28 items and consisted of four dimensions (physiological, psychological, socio-cultural and environmental). The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.851, and the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.875. Meanwhile, the content validity index (CVI) was 0.875∼1, and the scale-level average CVI was 0.99. The Chi-square/degree-of-freedom ratio of construct validity was 2.844, suggesting a good model-fitting. Furthermore, the overall average score of patient comfort was 3.72 ± 0.57, with scores ranging between 3.59 ± 0.71 and 3.83 ± 1.06 across all four dimensions, with the lowest score in the physiological dimension. The postoperative comfort scale has good reliability and validity and can be applied for the postoperative comfort assessment of patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for lung cancer. Overall, the degree of patient comfort in this assessment was moderate, meaning targeted measures may be required to further improve patient comfort, especially in the physiological dimension.

Development and external validation of a novel model for predicting new clinically important atrial fibrillation after thoracoscopic anatomical lung cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

New clinically important postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common arrhythmia after thoracoscopic anatomical lung cancer surgery and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The full spectrum of predictors remains unclear, and effective assessment tools are lacking. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a novel model for predicting new clinically important POAF. This retrospective study included 14074 consecutive patients who received thoracoscopic anatomical lung cancer surgery from January 2016 to December 2018 in Shanghai Chest Hospital. Based on the split date of 1 January 2018, we selected 8717 participants for the training cohort and 5357 participants for the testing cohort. For external validation, we pooled 2941 consecutive patients who received this surgical treatment from July 2016 to July 2021 in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital. Independent predictors were used to develop a model and internally validated using a bootstrap-resampling approach. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and Brier score were performed to assess the model discrimination and calibration. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate clinical validity and net benefit. New clinically important POAF was defined as a new-onset of POAF that causes symptoms or requires treatment. Multivariate analysis suggested that age, hypertension, preoperative treatment, clinical tumor stage, intraoperative arrhythmia and transfusion, and operative time were independent predictors of new clinically important POAF. These seven candidate predictors were used to develop a nomogram, which showed a concordance statistic (C-statistic) value of 0.740 and good calibration (Brier score; 0.025). Internal validation revealed similarly good discrimination (C-statistic, 0.736; 95% CI: 0.705-0.768) and calibration. The decision curve analysis showed positive net benefits with the threshold risk range of 0-100%. C-statistic value and Brier score were 0.717 and 0.028 in the testing cohort, and 0.768 and 0.012 in the external validation cohort, respectively. This study identified seven predictors of new clinically important POAF, among which preoperative treatment, intraoperative arrhythmia, and operative time were rarely reported. The established and externally validated model has good performance and clinical usefulness, which may promote the application of prevention and treatment in high-risk patients, and reduce the development and related adverse outcomes of this event.

Short-term effects of preoperative nutritional intervention in lung surgery for malignant tumors: a single-center prospective study.

Preoperative malnutrition is a risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality inpatients with lung cancer. Assessing the preoperative nutritional status should be considered essential for patients scheduled to undergo lung surgery. This prospective study aimed to investigate whether preoperative nutritional intervention improves the nutritional conditions and short-term postoperative outcomes. The primary endpoints included safety, feasibility and short-term therapeutic efficacy of preoperative nutritional intervention. Patients with clinical stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (histologically proven or suspected) were screened. Patient enrollment was conducted between January 2021 and December 2022. A total of 15 patients were included in the analysis. Patients with a preoperative prognostic nutritional index of < 45 were considered eligible. All participants received preoperative nutritional intervention. The trajectories of prognostic nutritional index and the incidence of postoperative complication rates in the intervention group were investigated. No adverse events were observed during the nutritional intervention. The pre-intervention and post-intervention prognostic nutritional indices were 42.2 (39.8-44.5), and 43.1 (41.4-45.9), respectively (p = 0.04). The postoperative complication rate was 26.7% (n = 15). This is the first prospective study to report the preoperative trajectories of prognostic nutritional index in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Our results suggest the safety and feasibility of preoperative nutritional intervention. Further research, such as randomized clinical trials, is warranted to investigate clinical efficacy and optimal nutritional interventions for lung surgery for malignant tumors.

The Interval of Computed Tomography Follow-Ups after Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Surgery Did Not Show Any Relationship with Survival.

There is limited evidence concerning the computed tomography (CT) follow-up interval to detect recurrence and second primary cancers after surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of CT interval on survival after surgery. This retrospective study analyzed the prognosis of 103 patients who underwent periodic CT after complete resection for pathological stage II-III NSCLC at a single institute between 2015 and 2020. The patients were stratified based on the follow-up CT intervals into the half-year group (Group H) and annual group (Group A). Additionally, the underlying differences in clinical backgrounds between the 2 groups were adjusted by propensity score matching. A total of 103 patients (Group H, 76 patients; Group A, 27 patients) were included in this study. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the unmatched cohort were 83.5% and 95.2% in groups H and A, respectively ( P = 0.17). Among the matched cohort, 42 and 21 patients were in groups H and A. The 5-year OS rates of the matched cohort were 89.8% and 94.4% in groups H and A ( P = 0.45), with no significant difference. There was no association between CT intervals and postoperative survival.

Pulmonary Rehabilitation Exercises Effectively Improve Chronic Cough After Surgery for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Cough is a major complication after lung cancer surgery, potentially impacting lung function and quality of life. However, effective treatments for managing long-term persistent postoperative cough remain elusive. In this study, we investigated the potential of a pulmonary rehabilitation training program to effectively address this issue. Between January 2019 and December 2022, a retrospective review was conducted on patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at Daping hospital. Based on their postoperative rehabilitation methods, the patients were categorized into 2 groups: the traditional rehabilitation group and the pulmonary rehabilitation group. All patients underwent assessment using the Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) on the third postoperative day. Additionally, at the 6-month follow-up, patients' LCQ scores and lung function were re-evaluated to assess the long-term effects of the pulmonary rehabilitation training programs. Among the 276 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 195 (70.7%) were in the traditional rehabilitation group, while 81 (29.3%) participated in the pulmonary rehabilitation group. The pulmonary rehabilitation group showed a significantly lower incidence of cough on the third postoperative day (16.0% vs 29.7%, P = .018) and higher LCQ scores in the somatic dimension (5.09 ± .81 vs 4.15 ± 1.22, P = .007) as well as in the total score (16.44 ± 2.86 vs 15.11 ± 2.51, P = .018, whereas there were no significant differences in psychiatric and sociological dimensions. At the 6-month follow-up, the pulmonary rehabilitation group continued to have a lower cough incidence (3.7% vs 12.8%, P = .022) and higher LCQ scores across all dimensions: somatic (6.19 ± .11 vs 5.75 ± 1.20, P = .035), mental (6.37 ± 1.19 vs 5.85 ± 1.22, P = .002), sociological (6.76 ± 1.22 vs 5.62 ± 1.08, P < .001), and total (18.22 ± 2.37 vs 16.21 ± 2.53, P < .001). Additionally, lung function parameters including FVC, FVC%, FEV1, FEV1%, MVV, MVV%, DLCO SB, and DLCO% were all significantly higher in the pulmonary rehabilitation group compared to the traditional group. Pulmonary rehabilitation exercises significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative cough and improved cough-related quality of life in patients undergoing lobectomy, with sustained benefits observed at the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, these exercises demonstrated superior lung function outcomes compared to traditional rehabilitation methods.

Postoperative pulmonary compensation after lung cancer surgery: a shift towards a modern and comprehensive model—a narrative review

Postoperative pulmonary compensation after lung cancer surgery: a shift towards a modern and comprehensive model—a narrative review

Evaluating VATS versus Open Surgery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A 5-year Retrospective Study.

The efficacy and safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus open thoracotomy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated with a focus on mediastinal lymph node dissection, postoperative recovery, and longterm outcomes including survival rates and disease-free intervals. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 228 NSCLC patients treated at the Institute of Oncology Bucharest from 2016 to 2022. Both VATS and open surgical approaches were compared, with variables including demographic data, comorbidities, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications meticulously recorded. Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square and independent samples t-tests. Results: Among the findings, VATS demonstrated significantly better two-year progression-free survival rates for patients in early stages (Stages 1-3) of NSCLC compared to open surgery, with p-values 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. In contrast, no significant difference was observed in Stage 4. Furthermore, VATS resulted in shorter operative times (mean 299 vs. 347 minutes, p 0.001), less estimated blood loss (98.68 mL vs. 160.88 mL, p 0.001), reduced chest tube duration (5.78 days vs. 12.17 days, p 0.001), and decreased hospital stays (12.0 days vs. 27.7 days, p 0.001). Conclusions: VATS is associated with improved long-term disease-free survival for early-stage NSCLC and more favorable short-term surgical outcomes, highlighting its advantages over open thoracotomy. Despite its benefits, VATS did not significantly reduce postoperative complications compared to open surgery.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Between Thoracoscopic Surgery and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Objective: To compare the risk of death, tumor recurrence, metastasis, and disease progression in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with thoracoscopic surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods: Patients who underwent radical surgery and SBRT for NSCLC between April 2010 and November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the survival outcomes of each patient group. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to estimate the risk of death, tumor recurrence, metastasis, and disease progression. Results: A total of 167 patients were enrolled, of whom 75 and 92 underwent SBRT and surgery, respectively. The median follow-up was 45 months (range, 4-105 months). SBRT patients were observed to be significantly older (median, 76.0 vs 67.0 years; P < .001), and associated with significantly higher mortality rate (42.7% vs 26.1%, P = .024). However, no significant difference in overall survival duration was seen between the SBRT and surgery groups (45.0 vs 41.0 months; P = .199). SBRT patients demonstrated significantly lower rates of metastasis (12.0% vs 30.4%, P = .004), and significantly longer metastasis-free survival (39.0 months vs 35.5 months, P = .020). The remaining outcomes, including tumor recurrence and disease progression rates, were similar between the groups. Compared to surgery, SBRT did not significantly associate with death, recurrence, or disease progression. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in overall, tumor recurrence-free, and disease progression-free survival between the groups (log-rank P < .05). Conclusions: SBRT demonstrated similar overall survival compared to radical surgery, and associated with significantly reduced risk of tumor metastasis. Our study thereby suggests SBRT as the best treatment option for patients with inoperable NSCLC.

Early Ambulation Following Lung Resection Surgery: Impact on Short-term Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer.

Previous studies indicated that early ambulation following lung resection can prevent postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). However, some patients fail to achieve early ambulation owing to factors such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, or pain, particularly on postoperative day 1. This study aimed to address the critical clinical question: Is ambulation for ≥10 m during initial pulmonary rehabilitation necessary after lung resection surgery? This retrospective observational cohort study included 407 patients who underwent lung resection surgery for lung cancer between January 2021 and December 2022. Twelve patients with a performance status of ≥2 and 21 patients lacking pulmonary rehabilitation prescriptions were excluded. Patients were categorized into the "early ambulation" group, which included individuals ambulating ≥10 m during rehabilitation on the first postoperative day, and the "delayed ambulation" group. The primary outcome was PPC incidence, with secondary outcomes encompassing pleural drain duration, hospital length of stay, and Δ6-minute walk distance (Δ6MWD: postoperative 6MWD minus preoperative 6MWD). The early and delayed ambulation groups comprised 315 and 59 patients, respectively. Significant disparities were noted in the length of hospital stay (7 [6-9] days vs. 8 [6-11] days, P = 0.01), pleural drainage duration (4 [3-5] days vs. 4 [3-6] days, P = 0.02), and Δ6MWD (-70 m vs. -100 m, P = 0.04). However, no significant difference was observed in PPC incidence (20.6% vs. 32.2%, P = 0.06). Ambulation for ≥10 m during initial pulmonary rehabilitation after lung resection surgery may yield short-term benefits as evidenced by improvements in various outcomes. However, it may not significantly affect the PPC incidence.

Factors Associated with Persistent Air Leaks after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer and Advances in Nursing Care

Factors Associated with Persistent Air Leaks after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer and Advances in Nursing Care

Enhanced deep learning model for precise nodule localization and recurrence risk prediction following curative-intent surgery for lung cancer.

Radical surgery is the primary treatment for early-stage resectable lung cancer, yet recurrence after curative surgery is not uncommon. Identifying patients at high risk of recurrence using preoperative computed tomography (CT) images could enable more aggressive surgical approaches, shorter surveillance intervals, and intensified adjuvant treatments. This study aims to analyze lung cancer sites in CT images to predict potential recurrences in high-risk individuals. We retrieved anonymized imaging and clinical data from an institutional database, focusing on patients who underwent curative pulmonary resections for non-small cell lung cancers. Our study used a deep learning model, the Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (MRCNN), to predict cancer locations and assign recurrence classification scores. To find optimized trained weighted values in the model, we developed preprocessing python codes, adjusted dynamic learning rate, and modifying hyper parameter in the model. The model training completed; we performed classifications using the validation dataset. The results, including the confusion matrix, demonstrated performance metrics: bounding box (0.390), classification (0.034), mask (0.266), Region Proposal Network (RPN) bounding box (0.341), and RPN classification (0.054). The model successfully identified lung cancer recurrence sites, which were then accurately mapped onto chest CT images to highlight areas of primary concern. The trained model allows clinicians to focus on lung regions where cancer recurrence is more likely, acting as a significant aid in the detection and diagnosis of lung cancer. Serving as a clinical decision support system, it offers substantial support in managing lung cancer patients.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in Postoperative Lung Cancer Patients: A Novel Perioperative Strategy for Preventing Venous Thromboembolism and Improving Quality of Life.

This study aimed to assess the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) intervention in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) among postoperative lung cancer patients. Conducted from January 2022 to January 2023, the research involved 125 lung cancer patients randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 60) receiving routine care, or an ERAS group (n = 65) which received both routine care and ERAS interventions. The ERAS program comprised a comprehensive series of interventions meticulously implemented throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. Thrombotic risk assessment using the Caprini Risk Assessment Model (RAM) was conducted preoperatively and on postoperative day 5 (POD 5), with plasma D-dimer levels measured preoperatively, on POD 1, POD 3, and POD 5. Quality of life and patient satisfaction were assessed at discharge using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) and The Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS), respectively. The ERAS group demonstrated significantly lower Caprini RAM scores on POD 5 compared to the control group, with lower D-dimer levels on POD 3 and POD 5. The incidence of VTE was lower in the ERAS group (1.54%) compared to the control group (11.67%) during hospitalization. At discharge, the ERAS group showed improved quality of life, with higher satisfaction scores for nursing care and their hospital stay. ERAS nursing interventions effectively mitigate thrombotic risk, improve D-dimer levels, enhance postoperative quality of life, and elevate patient satisfaction among individuals undergoing lung cancer surgery.

The relation of body adiposity to the outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer - a single-center cohort study.

The outcomes of lung cancer surgery depend on the patients' nutritional status. Body fat percentage (BF%) is one of the indicators of body composition and nutritional status. Direct measurement of BF% is complicated, requires significant resources and is rarely performed. The CUN-BAE (Clínica Universidad de Navarra - Body Adiposity Estimator) index has been shown to accurately predict BF% is several clinical settings, but its relation to the outcomes of lung surgery has not been reported so far. To determine the relation of the BF% to the outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy. This retrospective study included 1,183 patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer between June 1999, and September 2019 at one department. BF% was calculated according to the Clínica Universidad de Navarra - Body Adiposity Estimator equation. The primary endpoints were postoperative complications and long-term survival. Univariate analysis showed that higher BF% was related to lower incidence of complications (p = 0.001), including prolonged air leak (p < 0.001), atelectasis (p < 0.05), psychosis (p < 0.001), reoperations (p < 0.05), and shorter chest drainage (p = 0.001) and hospitalization duration (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that higher BF% was correlated with lower risk of complications (p = 0.005; OR = 0.964; 95% CI: 0.940 to 0.989), including prolonged air leak (p < 0.001; OR = 0.923; 95% CI: 0.886 to 0.962), and shorter duration of chest drainage (p < 0.001; B = -0.046; 95% CI: -0.069 to -0.023) and hospitalization (p < 0.001; B = -0.112; 95% CI: -0.176 to -0.048). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that BF% was not related to long-term survival. Body fat percentage is a valuable tool that can help predict the short-term outcomes of minimally lobectomy for lung cancer.

Effect of Intensive Nursing Care in Elderly Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Surgery: A Randomised Control Study

Introduction: Lung Cancer (LC) is a prominent cause of death worldwide, with both non small cell and small cell types increasing in prevalence. Multiple therapeutic options such as chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, including Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS), have been developed, although postoperative complications remain a concern. Nursing care has been advocated as a means to mitigate these adverse effects. However, the actual association between nursing care and LC postoperative complications and outcomes remains unknown. Aim: To assess the effects of Intensive Nursing Care (INC) on LC patients treated with VATS. Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomised control study in which a total of 256 Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients over the age of 60 years who underwent VATS in the Division 1 of Thoracic Surgery at Handan Central Hospital between January 2021 and January 2023 were included. The participants were randomly allocated to different groups: an INC group (n=126) and a control group receiving normal care (n=130). Lung function, reported symptoms, hospitalisation duration, psychological wellbeing (anxiety and depression scores), and occurrence of postsurgery symptoms (pain, fatigue, insomnia, dyspnea, nausea/vomiting) were assessed. T-tests or Fisher’sExact tests were used to compare baseline and postsurgical variables between the INC and Normal Nursing Care (NNC) groups using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 software. Results: The study population consisted of 53.1% females with an average age of 73.51±7.61 years, ranging from 60 to 85 years. INC significantly improved hospitalisation duration {Mean Difference (MD)= -1.9; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), -2.6 to -1.2; p-value&lt;0.001}, the occurrence of postsurgery symptoms (p-value&lt;0.001), and psychological states assessed by both the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SRAS) (MD=-17.99; 95% CI, -18.63 to -17.35; p-value=0.001) and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SRDS) (MD= -9.04; 95% CI, -9.95 to -8.13; p-value=0.008) in comparison to NNC patients. Conclusion: Given the global burden of LC, it is crucial to emphasise not only the development of treatments for this illness but also care regimens that alleviate complications associated with these therapies. In this study, INC as an alternative to routine nursing care in postsurgery recovery has proven to be more beneficial to patients by decreasing their hospitalisation stay, the occurrence of postsurgery symptoms, and by enhancing their mental state.

Low-Volume Elective Surgery and Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries Treated at Hospital Networks

Minimum volume standards have been advocated as a strategy to improve outcomes for certain surgical procedures. Hospital networks could avoid low-volume surgery by consolidating cases within network hospitals that meet volume standards, thus optimizing outcomes while retaining cases and revenue. The rates of compliance with volume standards among hospital networks and the association of volume standards with outcomes at these hospitals remain unknown. To quantify low-volume surgery and associated outcomes within hospital networks. This cross-sectional study used Medicare Provider Analysis and Review data to examine fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years who underwent 1 of 10 elective surgical procedures (abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, mitral valve repair, hip or knee replacement, bariatric surgery, or resection for lung, esophageal, pancreatic, or rectal cancers) in a network hospital from 2016 to 2018. Hospital volume for each procedure (calculated with the use of the National Inpatient Sample) was compared with yearly hospital volume standards for that procedure recommended by The Leapfrog Group. Networks were then categorized into 4 groups according to whether or not that hospital or another hospital in the network met low-volume standards for that procedure. Data were analyzed from February to June 2023. Receipt of surgery in a low-volume hospital within a network. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality, stratified by the volume status of the hospital and network type. The secondary outcome was the availability of a different high-volume hospital within the same network or outside the network and its proximity to the patient (based on hospital referral region and zip code). In all, data were analyzed for 950 079 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 74.4 [6.5] years; 621 138 females [59.2%] and 427 931 males [40.8%]) who underwent 1 049 069 procedures at 2469 hospitals within 382 networks. Of these networks, 380 (99.5%) had at least 1 low-volume hospital performing the elective procedure of interest. In 35 137 of 44 011 procedures (79.8%) that were performed at low-volume hospitals, there was a hospital that met volume standards within the same network and hospital referral region located a median (IQR) distance of 29 (12-60) miles from the patient's home. Across hospital networks, there was 43-fold variation in rates of low-volume surgery among the procedures studied (from 1.5% of carotid endarterectomies to 65.0% of esophagectomies). In adjusted analyses, postoperative outcomes were inferior at low-volume hospitals compared with hospitals meeting volume standards, with a 30-day mortality of 8.1% at low-volume hospitals vs 5.5% at hospitals that met volume standards (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.61-0.73]; P < .001). Findings of this study suggest that most US hospital networks had hospitals performing low-volume surgery that is associated with inferior surgical outcomes despite availability of a different in-network hospital that met volume standards within a median of 29 miles for the vast majority of patients. Strategies are needed to help patients access high-quality care within their networks, including avoidance of elective surgery at low-volume hospitals. Avoidance of low-volume surgery could be considered a process measure that reflects attention to quality within hospital networks.

The role of the diaphragm in prediction of respiratory function in the immediate postoperative period in lung cancer patients using a machine learning model

BackgroundThe prediction of postoperative respiratory function is necessary in identifying patients that are at greater risk of complications. There are not enough studies on the effect of the diaphragm on postoperative respiratory function prediction in lung cancer surgical patients. The objective of this study is to estimate the precision of machine learning methods in the prediction of respiratory function in the immediate postoperative period and how diaphragm function contributes to that prediction.Materials and methodsOur prospective study included 79 patients who underwent lung cancer surgery. Diaphragm function was estimated by its mobility measured both ultrasonographically and radiographically and by noninvasive muscle strength tests. We present a new machine learning multilayer regression metamodel, which predicts FEV1 for each patient based on preoperative measurements.ResultsThe proposed regression models are specifically trained to predict FEV1 in the immediate postoperative period and were proved to be highly accurate (mean absolute error in the range from 8 to 11%). Predictive models based on resected segments give two to three times less precise results. Measured FEV1 was 44.68% ± 14.07%, 50.95% ± 15.80%, and 58.0%1 ± 14.78%, and predicted postoperative (ppo) FEV1 was 43.85% ± 8.80%, 50.62% ± 9.28%, and 57.85% ± 10.58% on the first, fourth, and seventh day, respectively. By interpreting the obtained model, the diaphragm contributes to ppoFEV1 13.62% on the first day, 10.52% on the fourth, and 9.06% on the seventh day.ConclusionThe machine learning metamodel gives more accurate predictions of postoperative lung function than traditional calculations. The diaphragm plays a notable role in the postoperative FEV1 prediction.