Lung Cancer Surgery In Patients Research Articles

Chest tube provocative clamping in patients having moderate or intense air leaks after lung resection to accelerate recovery.

Postoperative air leak is the most common complication after pulmonary resection. "Provocative clamping" was first described in 1992 in the context of guiding chest tube removal despite persistent air leak. However, early provocative clamping after pulmonary resection has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate whether provocative clamping leads to severe complications following lung cancer surgery in patients with air leaks, particularly in the context of early chest tube removal. This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent pulmonary resection between September 2022 and October 2023. Air leak on postoperative day 1 or 2 was classified as grade 0-1 (low) or grade 2-4 (high). Low air leak allowed for immediate chest tube removal if there was no apparent pneumothorax or if pleural effusion was <200 mL. Meanwhile, high air leak necessitated chest tube clamping. Radiography was performed 24 hours after (with clamping) if there was no increase in subcutaneous emphysema or symptoms. The chest tube could then be removed if there was no increased pneumothorax. This study included 74 patients (53 had low leak, and 21 had high leak). The mean chest tube insertion durations were 2.2 days for low leak (range, 1-5 days) and 3.2 days for high leak (range, 2-7 days). The hospital lengths of stay were 3.7 days for low leak (range, 1-6 days) and 4.5 days for high leak (range, 3-8 days). One patient (1.3%) had a prolonged air leak (>5 days). No tension pneumothorax occurred during hospitalization or after discharge. One patient in the high leak group developed hydropneumothorax at 3 weeks after discharge, in whom the chest tube was reinserted. Use of provocative clamping immediately after pulmonary resection appears to be safe for high-grade air leak patients.

Optimizing Random Forest for Predicting Thoracic Surgery Success in Lung Cancer Using Recursive Feature Elimination and GridSearchCV

Abstract. Lung cancer is one of the deadliest forms of cancer, claiming numerous lives annually. Thoracic surgery is a strategy to manage lung cancer patients; however, it poses high risks, including potential nerve damage and fatal complications leading to mortality. Predicting the success rate of thoracic surgery for lung cancer patients can be accomplished using data mining techniques based on classification principles. Medical data mining involves employing mathematical, statistical, and computational methods. In this study, the prediction of thoracic surgery success employs the random forest algorithm with recursive feature elimination for feature selection. The feature selection process yields the top 8 features. The 8 best features include 'DGN', 'PRE4', 'PRE5', 'PRE6', 'PRE10', 'PRE14', 'PRE30', and 'AGE'. Hyperparameter using GridSearchCV is then applied to enhance classification accuracy. The results of this method implementation demonstrate a predictive accuracy of 91.41%. Purpose: The study aims to develop and evaluate a Random Forest model with a Recursive Feature Elimination feature selection and applies hyperparameter GridSearchCV for predicting thoracic surgery success rate. Methods: This study uses the thoracic surgery dataset and applies various data preprocessing techniques. The dataset is then used for classification using the Random Forest algorithm and applies the Recursive Feature Elimination feature selection to obtain the best features. GridSearchCV is used in this study for hyperparameter. Result: The accuracy using the Random Forest algorithm and Recursive Feature Elimination feature selection with hyperparameters tuning GridSearchCV resulted in an accuracy of 91,41%. The accuracy was obtained from the following parameters values: bootstrap set to false, criterion set to gini, n_estimator equal to 100, max_depth set to none, min_samples_split equal to 4, min_samples_leaf equal to 1, max_features set to auto, n_jobs set to -1, and verbose set to 2 with 10-fold cross validation. Novelty: This study comparison and analysis of various dataset preprocessing methods and different model configurations are conducted to find the best model for predicting the success rate of thoracic surgery. The study also employs feature selection to choose the best feature to be used in classification process, as well as hyperparameter tuning to achieve optimal accuracy and discover the optimal values for these hyperparameters.

Prognostic Impact and Clinical Features of Spread through Air Spaces in Operated Lung Cancer: Real-World Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Spread through air spaces (STAS) is an adverse prognostic factor that has become increasingly known in recent years. This study aims to investigate the impact of STAS presence on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with surgically resected stage IA-IIIA lung cancer and to identify clinicopathological features associated with STAS. Materials and Methods: This research involved 311 lung cancer surgery patients. The relationship between the presence of STAS in the patients' surgical pathology and OS and DFS values was examined. Clinicopathological features associated with the presence of STAS were determined. Results: There were 103 (33%) STAS-positive patients. Adenocarcinoma histological subtype, perineural invasion (PNI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were significantly correlated with being STAS positive. STAS significantly predicted DFS and OS. One-year and five-year DFS rates were significantly lower in the STAS-positive group compared to the STAS-negative group (65% vs. 88%, 29% vs. 62%, respectively, p ≤ 0.001). Similarly, one-year and five-year OS rates were significantly lower in the STAS-positive group compared to the STAS-negative group (92% vs. 94%, 54% vs. 88%, respectively, p ≤ 0.001). In multivariate analysis, STAS was found to be an independent prognostic factor for both DFS and OS (HR: 3.2 (95%CI: 2.1-4.8) and 3.1 (95%CI: 1.7-5.5), p < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Conclusions: In our study, STAS was found to be an independent prognostic biomarker in operated stage IA-IIIA lung cancer patients. It may be a beneficial pathological biomarker in predicting the survival of patients and managing their treatments.

Safety of Perioperative Maintenance of Antiplatelet Agents in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery.

The maintenance of antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of bleeding during lung cancer surgery. Conversely, the perioperative interruption of antiplatelet therapy may result in serious thrombotic complications. This study aimed to investigate the safety of continuing antiplatelet therapy in the context of lung cancer surgery. We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 498 elderly patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer. These patients were categorized into 2 groups: group N, which did not receive antiplatelet therapy, and group A, which did. Group A was subsequently subdivided into group Am, where antiplatelet therapy was maintained, and group Ai, where antiplatelet therapy was interrupted. We compared the incidence of bleeding-related and thrombotic complications across the 3 groups. There were 387 patients in group N and 101 patients in group A (Ai: 70, Am: 31). No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss, thoracotomy conversion rates, transfusion requirements, volume of chest tube drainage, or reoperation rates for bleeding control between groups N and A or between groups Am and Ai. The duration of hospital stay was longer for group A compared to group N (7 days vs. 6 days, p=0.005), but there was no significant difference between groups Ai and Am. The incidence of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular complications did not differ significantly between groups Ai and Am. However, group Ai included a severe case of in-hospital ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The maintenance of antiplatelet therapy was found to be safe in terms of perioperative bleeding and thrombotic complications in elderly lung cancer surgery patients.

Chinese Expert Consensus on Day Surgery Management of Lung Cancer (2024 Edition)

To alleviate the medical burden of lung cancer surgery and facilitate the implementation of the national hierarchical diagnosis and treatment policy, it is imperative to establish a hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system for day surgery of lung cancer. Identifying key quality control checkpoints in day surgery of lung cancer is essential to enhance medical quality, ensure safety, and improve the efficiency of medical services. These efforts aim to uphold a safe and well-structured progression of day surgery practices in China. The Chinese Expert Consensus Group on Day Surgery Management of Lung Cancer has convened national experts in relevant fields and integrated the latest research findings from both domestic and international sources to craft the Chinese Expert Consensus on Day Surgery Management of Lung Cancer (2024 Edition). This consensus is founded on the principles of holistic management of lung cancer surgery and comprehensive patient care throughout their medical journey. It encompasses preoperative assessments, anesthesia protocols, surgical procedures, postoperative care, hospital-community collaboration initiatives, and emergency response strategies. The primary objective of this expert consensus is to furnish research assistance and clinical recommendations to advance the practice of day surgery for lung cancer patients in China. .

Correlation between pre-anesthesia anxiety and emergence agitation in non-small cell lung cancer surgery patients.

Preoperative anxiety is a common emotional problem during the perioperative period and may adversely affect postoperative recovery. Emergence agitation (EA) is a common complication of general anesthesia that may increase patient discomfort and hospital stay and may be associated with the development of postoperative complications. Pre-anesthetic anxiety may be associated with the development of EA, but studies in this area are lacking. To determine the relationship between pre-anesthetic anxiety and EA after radical surgery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eighty patients with NSCLC undergoing surgical treatment between June 2020 and June 2023 were conveniently sampled. We used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale's (HADS) anxiety subscale (HADS-A) to determine patients' anxiety at four time points (T1-T4): Patients' preoperative visit, waiting period in the surgical waiting room, after entering the operating room, and before anesthesia induction, respectively. The Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (RSAS) examined EA after surgery. Scatter plots of HADS-A and RSAS scores assessed the correlation between patients' pre-anesthesia anxiety status and EA. We performed a partial correlation analysis of HADS-A scores with RSAS scores. NSCLC patients' HADS-A scores gradually increased at the four time points: 7.33 ± 2.03 at T1, 7.99 ± 2.22 at T2, 8.05 ± 2.81 at T3, and 8.36 ± 4.17 at T4. The patients' postoperative RSAS score was 4.49 ± 1.18, and 27 patients scored ≥ 5, indicating that 33.75% patients had EA. HADS-A scores at T3 and T4 were significantly higher in patients with EA (9.67 ± 3.02 vs 7.23 ± 2.31, 12.56 ± 4.10 vs 6.23 ± 2.05, P < 0.001). Scatter plots showed the highest correlation between HADS-A and RSAS scores at T3 and T4. Partial correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between HADS-A and RSAS scores at T3 and T4 (r = 0.296, 0.314, P < 0.01). Agitation during anesthesia recovery in patients undergoing radical resection for NSCLC correlated with anxiety at the time of entering the operating room and before anesthesia induction.

Unveiling the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lung Cancer Surgery.

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical treatment of lung cancer patients. Data from patients who underwent surgery during the pandemic were analyzed and compared to pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods. Multiple parameters were examined, and their changes yielded significant results compared to other periods of the study. The statistical analysis revealed a significant decrease in the number of surgical interventions during the pandemic (p < 0.001), followed by a significant rebound thereafter. During this period, there was a significant increase in the T stage of cancer compared to both pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods (p = 0.027). Additionally, the mean Charlson comorbidity index score was significantly higher during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (p = 0.042). In this crisis period, a significant decrease was recorded in both the total hospitalization duration (p = 0.015) and the pre-operative hospitalization duration (p = 0.006). These findings provide evidence of significant changes in clinical and therapeutic strategies applied to lung cancer surgery patients during the study period. The pandemic has had a substantial and complex impact, the full extent of which remains to be fully understood.

Effects of mindful breathing training combined with diary-based rehabilitation guidance in lung cancer patients undergoing surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Background and purposeLung cancer surgery patients experience severe physical and mental symptoms, which seriously affect their quality of life and prognosis. Mindful breathing training is a promising strategy to improve their symptoms, but its effectiveness is affected by training compliance, and diary-based rehabilitation instruction has been shown to help improve training compliance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of mindful breathing training combined with diary-based rehabilitation guidance on improving perioperative outcomes in lung cancer surgery patients. Materials and methodsThis single-center, assessor-blinded, prospective, three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 1, 2021 to November 1, 2022. Patients diagnosed with primary non-small cell lung cancer and scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to the combined intervention group, the mindful breathing group or the control group, with 34 patients in each group. The control group received routine care, while the mindful breathing group received mindful breathing training and routine care. The combined intervention group received both mindful breathing training and diary-based rehabilitation guidance, along with routine care. ResultsThe per-protocol analysis revealed that patients in the mindful breathing group experienced statistically significant improvements in dyspnea, fatigue and anxiety. Patients in the combined intervention group had statistically significant improvements in dyspnea, fatigue, anxiety, depression, exercise self-efficacy and training compliance. ConclusionThis study provides evidence that mindful breathing training combined with diary-based rehabilitation guidance can be effective in improving perioperative outcomes in lung cancer patients. It can be applied in clinical practice in the future.

Clinic information, pathological, and imaging characteristics in 2 058 surgical patients with lung cancer from a single center.

Lung cancer is characterized by its high incidence and case fatality rate. Factors related to population composition and cancer prevention programme policy have an effect on the incidence and diagnosis of lung cancer. This study aims to provide scientific support for early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer by investigating the clinic information, pathological, and imaging characteristics of surgical patients with lung cancer. The data of 2 058 patients, who underwent surgery for lung cancer in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from 2016 to 2019, were retrospectively collected to analyze changes in clinic information, pathological, and imaging characteristics. From 2016 to 2019, the number of patients per year was 280, 376, 524, and 878, respectively. Adenocarcinoma (68.1%) was the most common pathological type of surgical patients with lung cancer. From 2016 to 2019, the proportion of adenocarcinoma was increased from 55.5% to 74.1%. The proportion lung cancer patients in stage IA was increased from 38.9% to 62.3%, and the proportion of patients who underwent sublobar resection was increased from 1.8% to 8.6%. The proportion of lymph node sampling was increased in 2019. Compared with the rate in 2016, the detection rate of nodules with diameter≤1 cm detected by CT before surgery in 2019 was significantly improved (2.0% vs 18.2%), and the detection rate of nodules with diameter>3 cm was decreased (34.7% vs 18.3%). From 2016 to 2019, the proportion of lesions with pure ground-glass density and partial solid density detected by CT was increased from 2.0% and 16.6% to 20.0% and 37.3%, respectively. The proportion of solid density was decreased from 81.4% to 42.7%. The number of lung cancer surgery patients is rapidly increasing year by year, the proportion of CT-detected purely ground-glass density and partially solid density lesions are increasing, the proportion of patients with adenocarcinoma is rising, the proportion of early-stage lung cancer is increasing, smaller lung cancers are detected in earlier clinical stage leading to a more minimally invasive approach to the surgical methods.

Effects of thoracoscopic lobectomy on surgical wound infection in patients with lung cancer: A meta‐analysis

AbstractThis meta‐analysis systematically evaluates the impact of thoracoscopic lobectomy on wound infection and complications in lung cancer patients. An extensive computerized search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases for studies comparing thoracoscopic lobectomy with open thoracotomy in the treatment of lung cancer, covering the period up to September 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the quality according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. Ultimately, 21 studies involving 2118 lung cancer surgery patients were included. The analysis revealed that thoracoscopic lobectomy significantly reduced the incidence of wound infections (odds ratio [OR] = 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13–0.37, p &lt; 0.001) and complications (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.21–0.36, p &lt; 0.001) in lung cancer surgery patients, and also significantly shortened hospital stays (standardized mean difference = −2.07, 95% CI: −2.39 to −1.76, p &lt; 0.001). This study indicates that compared with conventional open thoracotomy, thoracoscopic lobectomy in the treatment of lung cancer reduces the incidence of wound infections and complications and shortens hospital stays, demonstrating significant therapeutic efficacy and warranting broader clinical application.

Effects of accelerated rehabilitation surgical care on the surgical site wound infection and postoperative complications in patients of lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

To comprehensively evaluate the effect of accelerated rehabilitation surgical care on perioperative wound infections and complications in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. A comprehensive computerised search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of accelerated rehabilitative surgical care applied to patients undergoing lung cancer surgery was conducted using the Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases from inception to September 2023. The literature was screened and evaluated by two investigators, and data were extracted from the final included literature. Stata software (version 17.0) was used for data analysis. Overall, 21 RCTs involving 2187 patients were included, including 1093 cases in the accelerated rehabilitation surgical care group and 1094 cases in the conventional care group. The analyses revealed that patients with lung cancer surgery who implemented accelerated rehabilitation surgical care were significantly less likely to develop postoperative wound infections (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.49, p < 0.001) and postoperative complications (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.20-0.34, p < 0.001) and shortened the hospital length of stay (standardised mean differences [SMD] = -1.93, 95% CI: -2.32 to -1.53, and p < 0.001) compared with conventional care. The effect of accelerated rehabilitation surgical care intervention in the perioperative period of lung cancer surgery patients is remarkable, as it can effectively reduce the incidence of wound infection and complications, shorten hospitalisation time and promote patient recovery.

Thoracic day surgery versus thoracic inpatient surgery for treatment of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe successful implementation of the Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in thoracic surgery has made it possible to complete the surgery in the day surgery unit. However, it is still unclear whether day surgery for lung cancer patients can achieve the same or even better results.MethodsA systematic literature search was completed in common databases for studies published before May 2022 and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software.ResultsWe ultimately included 7 retrospective articles that met our criteria for the study. The results of age, smoking status, comorbidity and pulmonary function tests in day surgery group were better than in inpatient surgery group. Minimally invasive surgical method with segmentectomy was more used in day surgery group than in normal surgery group. The 30-day mortality was also lower in Day surgery group and it displayed that early discharged patients had fewer overall complications than the inpatient surgery group.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that younger patients, patients receiving segmental resections by VATS, and those with better pulmonary function tests or without comorbidity can be discharged early with low rates of complications and 30-day mortality, especial with ERAS program.

Outcomes in Incidentally Versus Screening Detected Stage I Lung Cancer Surgery Patients

IntroductionAlthough the importance of lung cancer screening for early diagnosis is established, because of poor enrollment, incidental findings still play a role in diagnosis of patients who qualify. Nevertheless, analysis of this incidental cohort is lacking. We present a retrospective analysis comparing patients with thoracic surgery with incidental versus screening detected stage I lung cancer. MethodsThoracic surgery cases at Mount Sinai Hospital from March, 1, 2012, to June, 30, 2022, were queried for patients eligible for lung cancer screening and a stage I diagnosis. The basis of lung nodule detection (incidental versus screening detected) was identified. We compared demographic variables, comorbidities, tumor staging, procedure details, and postoperative outcomes between the cohorts. ResultsOf the patients eligible for screening with lung cancer resection and stage I diagnosis at Mount Sinai, 153 were identified incidentally and 67 through screening. The patients in the incidental cohort were older (p = 0.005), more likely to have quit smoking (p = 0.04), and had a greater number of comorbidities (p = 0.0002). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to pack-year smoking history, lung cancer histological type, location or size of tumor, and surgical approach, length of surgery or stay, number of postoperative outcomes, and survival. ConclusionsIn stage I lung cancers, no significant differences were identified between incidentally and screening detected lung nodules with regard to tumor characteristics, surgical approach, and postoperative outcomes. Imaging conducted for other reasons should be considered as a valid and important diagnostic tool, similar to traditional low-dose computed tomography, in patients who qualify for screening.

Seven preoperative factors have strong predictive value for postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.

Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a hospital acquired pneumonia that occurs >48 hours after tracheal intubation. The diagnosis of POP should be based on clinical and radiological findings within 30 days after surgery. It is a common complication after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer patients. However, the specific impact of preoperative comorbidities on the incidence of POP remains unclear. This study aimed to analyze the preoperative data of patients with lung cancer to help surgeons predict the risk of incidence of POP after thoracoscopic lung resection. This study is a prospective study that included patients with lung cancer who were scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery in 1 year. All cases came from two medical centers. Preoperative demographic information, tumor information, preoperative comorbidities, quality of life scores, and incidence of POP were collected. Variables were screened by univariate analysis and multivariate regression. Finally, a prediction model was constructed. A total of 53 preoperative factors were included as candidate predictors. The binary outcome variable was defined as the presence or absence of POP. The incidence of POP was the primary outcome variable. The predictive performance of the model was verified internally through 1,000 iterations of bootstrap resampling. A total of 1,229 patients with lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic surgery were enrolled. In addition, 196 cases (15.95%) had POP; 1,025 (83.40%) patients had comorbid conditions. The total number of comorbidity diagnosed in all samples was 2,929. The prediction model suggested that patients with advanced age, high body mass index (BMI), smoking, poor physical condition, respiratory diseases, diabetes, and neurological diseases were more likely to develop POP. The area under the curve (AUC) and Brier scores were 0.851 and 0.091, respectively. The expected and observed results were in strong agreement, according to the likelihood of POP calibration curve. The constructed model is capable of evaluating the probability of POP occurrence in patients with lung cancer. Seven preoperative factors in patients with lung cancer were found to be associated with increased probability of having pneumonia after thoracoscopic lung resection. This model can help predict the incidence of POP after surgery.

Social determinants of health and lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study.

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are non-clinical factors that may affect the outcomes of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the influence of SDOH factors on quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes for lung cancer surgery patients. Thirteen patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a dyadic self-management intervention were invited and agreed to participate in semi-structured key informant interviews at study completion (3 months post-discharge). A conventional content analysis approach was used to identify codes and themes that were derived from the interviews. Independent investigators coded the qualitative data, which were subsequently confirmed by a second group of independent investigators. Themes were finalized, and discrepancies were reviewed and resolved. Six themes, each with several subthemes, emerged. Overall, most participants were knowledgeable about the concept of SDOH and perceived that provider awareness of SDOH information was important for the delivery of comprehensive care in surgery. Some participants described financial challenges during treatment that were exacerbated by their cancer diagnosis and resulted in stress and poor QOL. The perceived impact of education varied and included its importance in navigating the healthcare system, decision-making on health behaviors, and more economic mobility opportunities. Some participants experienced barriers to accessing healthcare due to insurance coverage, travel burden, and the fear of losing quality insurance coverage due to retirement. Neighborhood and built environment factors such as safety, air quality, access to green space, and other environmental factors were perceived as important to QOL. Social support through families/friends and spiritual/religious communities was perceived as important to postoperative recovery. Among lung cancer surgery patients, SDOH factors can impact QOL and the patient's survivorship journey. Importantly, SDOH should be assessed routinely to identify patients with unmet needs across the five domains. SDOH-driven interventions are needed to address these unmet needs and to improve the QOL and quality of care for lung cancer surgery patients.

P1.16-04 Differences in Incidentally Detected Versus Screening Detected Stage I Lung Cancer Surgery Patients

P1.16-04 Differences in Incidentally Detected Versus Screening Detected Stage I Lung Cancer Surgery Patients

P2.25-01 Geriatric Assessment in Lung Cancer Surgery Patients and Caregivers

P2.25-01 Geriatric Assessment in Lung Cancer Surgery Patients and Caregivers

P2.25-04 Unmet Social Needs and Spiritual Well-Being of Lung Cancer Surgery Patients and Family Caregivers from the United States

P2.25-04 Unmet Social Needs and Spiritual Well-Being of Lung Cancer Surgery Patients and Family Caregivers from the United States

Differential Outcomes of VATS and Open Surgery in Lung Cancer Patients with Antecedent Oncological Diagnoses.

Primary lung cancer is a devastating disease with high morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with a previous oncological history may present with multiple comorbidities, unique clinical features, and unique outcomes after surgical intervention for primary lung cancer. This study aimed to compare the clinical features and outcomes of patients with a previous oncological history who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or open surgery (OS) for primary lung cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 patients with a previous oncological history who underwent surgical intervention for primary lung cancer between January 2018 and January 2023. Among them, 55 patients underwent VATS, while 29 patients underwent OS. Demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative variables, and postoperative outcomes of the two surgical groups were collected and compared. Most of the 84 patients were women (58.4%) with a high smoking prevalence (44.1%) and a median of 32.3 packs-year. The patients' histories were most predominant for gynecologic cancers (44.4%) and colorectal cancers (18.6%). The results showed that the VATS group had a significantly shorter median hospital stay than the OS group (6.0 days vs. 12.0 days, p-value < 0.001). Additionally, the VATS group had lower incidences of air leaks 24 h post-surgery (12.7% vs. 48.3%, p-value < 0.001) and intractable pain (3.6% vs. 17.2%, p-value = 0.031), as well as significantly lower operative times (270 min vs. 350 min, p-value = 0.046). However, there were no significant differences between the VATS and OS groups in overall survival (log-rank p-value = 0.447). Furthermore, although the 3-month survival was significantly higher in the VATS group (98.2% vs. 79.3%, p-value = 0.003), only one patient from the VATS group (1.8%) and two patients from the OS group (6.9%) were still alive five years after the intervention. In conclusion, VATS is a safe and effective surgical option for patients with a previous oncological history who require surgical intervention for primary lung cancer, with shorter operative times, shorter hospital stays, and lower rates of complications compared to those of OS patients, without compromising oncological outcomes. Nevertheless, both surgical options failed to improve the 5-year survival rate, probably due to the high prevalence of comorbidities and the burden of previous cancer in this population.

Comparison of transfusion rates between robotic- and video-assisted lobectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

The objective is to compare the perioperative blood transfusion rate and postoperative complications between robot-assisted surgery and thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients. This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients underwent lung cancer minimally invasive resection at Fujian Cancer Hospital from April 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023, were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into robotic-assisted lobectomy (RAL) and video-assisted lobectomy (VAL) groups according to the surgical methods. Data, including demographics, clinic variables, and endpoint outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record. Propensity score matching(PSM) was performed to analyze the baseline data of patients. The RAL group and the VAL group were matched 1:1. Then, the blood transfusion rates and short-term outcomes of the two groups were compared. A logistic regression was performed to analyze the independent risk factors of perioperative blood transfusion. A total of 558 patients were enrolled in this study. 166 of 558 patients were divided into the RAL group, and 392 patients were into the VAL group. A total of 118 patients were selected and analyzed following propensity score matching. After PSM, there was no difference in perioperative transfusion rates, including RBC transfusion and frozen plasma transfusion, between the VAL and RAL groups (P > 0.05). TheRAL group had fewer days of drainage tubes (P = 0.036). There was no difference in other short-term outcomes, including the volume of thoracic drainage, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the length of hospitalization, and the rate of postoperative pulmonary infection (P > 0.05). Volume of intraoperative blood loss, volume of thoracic drainage, and preoperative hemoglobin were independent risk factors of perioperative red blood cell or frozen plasma transfusion; however, RAL or VAL was not. The study showed that the rates of perioperative blood transfusion were comparable between RAL and VAL. RAL is superior for patient recovery in terms of short-term outcomes.