Surgery For Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Research Articles

Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2–3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients’ anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.

Residual Adrenal Function After Multivisceral Resection With Adrenalectomy in Adult Patients

The risk of developing adrenal insufficiency (AI) following adrenalectomy has been insufficiently studied in the context of multivisceral resection (MVR). To evaluate the incidence of AI in patients undergoing MVR with en bloc adrenalectomy. Prospective observational longitudinal study in a single referral center including 56 consecutive adult patients undergoing retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery from June 2019 to August 2020. Those who were candidates for MVR with en bloc adrenalectomy and had no preexisting adrenal impairment were considered eligible. Of these, 4 individuals were excluded because they did not receive adrenalectomy at the time of surgery and 2 because they were not considered evaluable for the main end point. Follow-up was set at 4 months after surgery, and 49 patients completed follow-up. Data were analyzed from October 2020 to September 2021. Diagnosis of AI was determined by low-dose (1 μg) adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test with a threshold of 20 μg/dL in blood samples retrieved 30 and 60 minutes after stimulation. ACTH test was repeated on postoperative days 1 and 10 and at 4 months' follow-up. The primary end point was incidence and relevance of AI after MVR. Secondary end points were associations with patient- and tumor-related factors, impact on perioperative hemodynamic management, and association with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Fifty patients (26 female; median [IQR] age, 59 [46-67] years) were evaluable. Incidence of AI was 64% (32 of 50 patients) in the early postoperative period and 38.5% (15 of 39 patients) at follow-up. Patients with AI showed lower postoperative cortisol values. Factors associated with risk of AI at univariate analysis were high American Society of Anesthesiologists score (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.48) and high malignancy grade (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.46). Clinical outcomes not associated with AI included morbidity, mortality, reoperation rate, admission to intensive care unit, length of intensive care unit stay, total hospital stay, and long-term quality of life. In this study, AI after MVR with en bloc adrenalectomy was frequent, even in patients with adequate preoperative adrenal function. Despite this, adrenalectomy can be safely performed. Patients at risk should be monitored in the long term to exclude underrated impairment of adrenal function.

ASO Author Reflection: Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Sentinel Event of Severe Complications in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery.

ASO Author Reflection: Delayed Gastric Emptying as a Sentinel Event of Severe Complications in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery.

Postoperative Outcomes of Distal Pancreatectomy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Abutting the Pancreas in the Left Upper Quadrant.

BackgroundEn bloc resection of the tumor with adjacent organs is recommended for localized retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). However, resection of the pancreas is controversial because it may cause serious complications, such as pancreatic fistula or bleeding. Thus, we evaluated the outcomes of distal pancreatectomy (DP) in pancreas-abutting RPS of the left upper quadrant (LUQ).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent surgery for RPS between September 2001 and April 2020. We selected 150 patients with all or part of their tumor located in the LUQ on preoperative computed tomography. Eighty-six patients who had tumors abutting the pancreas were finally enrolled in our study.ResultsFifty-three patients (53/86; 61.6%) were included in the non-DP group, and 33 patients (33/86; 38.4%) were included in the DP group. Total postoperative complications and complication rates for those Clavien–Dindo grade 3 or higher were similar between the non-DP group and DP group (p = 0.290 and p = 0.550). In the DP group, grade B pancreatic fistulae occurred in 18.2% (6/33) of patients, but grade C pancreatic fistulae were absent, and microscopic pancreatic invasion was noted in 42.4% (14/33) of patients. During multivariate analysis, microscopic pancreatic invasion was deemed a risk factor for local recurrence (p = 0.029). However, there were no significant differences on preoperative computed tomography findings between the pancreatic invasion and non-invasion groups.ConclusionDP is a reasonable procedure for pancreas-abutting RPS located at the LUQ when both complications and complete resection are considered.

Measuring the impact of complications after surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma: Is comprehensive complication index better than Clavien-Dindo Classification?

BackgroundTo compare the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery in assessing the real burden of post-operative complications on both post-operative length of stay and total costs of hospitalization (PLOS and TCH, respectively). Study designA series of 417 procedures for both primary and recurrent RPS between January 2000 and December 2017 was analyzed. Complications were classified according to both CDC and CCI. Univariable linear regressions were used to assess predictors associated with PLOS and TCH. Multivariable linear regression models were constructed to identify the factors independently associated with PLOS and TCH. ResultsMedian PLOS was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7–16); median TCH was 7033.5€ (IQR 1350–305.900). Post-operative complications occurred in 170/417 (40.7%) of the procedures and in 75/417 (17.9%) of the procedures CDCs >3 were identified. Sixty-four (15.34%) patients had more than one complication. Univariable linear regression showed that both PLOS and TCH were significantly associated to both CDC and CCI among other factors. Multivariable linear analyses selected CDC and CCI as independent prognostic factors for both PLOS and TCH. According to the AIC and BIC, models including CCI performed better (5559.53 and 5598.18, respectively, compared with 5561.31 and 5599.95 for CDC models). ConclusionThe CCI resulted to perform better than the CDC in describing the overall burden of complications after RPS surgery, both for clinical and economic purposes.

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: surgical management

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogeneous tumors with high recurrence rates that require amultimodal treatment approach and asurgical resection strategy adapted to tumor localization and histological subtype. Based on current scientific data this article intends to provide an overview on subtype-specific features, prognostic factors and operative techniques in the surgical management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. Areview of the literature addressing surgical management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas was performed. Current evidence and recommendations were summarized. Macroscopically complete tumor resection represents the sole curative treatment option for both primary and recurrent retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. To minimize the probability of tumor-infiltrated resection margins, compartmental resection has become astandard treatment for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. This approach includes resection of all organs and structures adjacent to the tumor. Multivisceral resection is often associated with this approach and it is acceptable in terms of morbidity and mortality if performed at acenter with experience in retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery. Histologic subtype, tumor grading, and quality of initial surgical treatment are major prognostic factors for oncologic overall survival.

ASO Author Reflections: Selecting Patients for Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery: The Challenging Trade-Off Between Oncologic Outcome and Morbidity.

ASO Author Reflections: Selecting Patients for Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery: The Challenging Trade-Off Between Oncologic Outcome and Morbidity.

Perioperative blood transfusion is not an independent predictor for worse outcomes in retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery

BackgroundSurgery for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) is technically challenging, often requiring perioperative red blood cell transfusion (PBT). In other cancers, controversy exists regarding the association of PBT and oncologic outcomes. No study has assessed this association in primary RPS, or identified factors associated with PBT. MethodsData was collected on all resected primary RPS between 2006 and 2020 at The Ottawa Hospital (Canada) and University Hospital Birmingham (United Kingdom). ‘PBT’ denotes transfusion given one week before surgery until discharge. Multivariable regression (MVA) identified clinicopathologic factors associated with PBT and assessed PBT association with oncologic outcomes. Surgical complexity was measured using resected organ score (ROS) and patterns of resection. Results192 patients were included with 98 (50.8%) receiving PBT. Median follow-up was 38.2 months. High tumour grade (OR 2.20, P = 0.048), preoperative anemia (OR 2.78, P = 0.020), blood loss >1000 mL (OR 4.89, P = 0.004) and ROS >2 (OR 2.29, P = 0.026) were associated with PBT on MVA. A direct linear relationship was observed between higher ROS and increasing units of PBT (β = 0.586, P = 0.038). Increasingly complex patterns of resection were associated with increasing odds of PBT. PBT was associated with severe post-operative complications (P = 0.008) on MVA. Univariable association between PBT and 5-year disease-free or overall survival was lost upon MVA. ConclusionsSurgical complexity and high tumour grade are potentially related to PBT. Oncologic outcomes are not predicted by PBT but are better explained by tumour grade which subsequently may increase surgical complexity. Strategies to reduce PBT should be considered in primary RPS patients.

Retroperitoneal Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Retrospective Study from a Cancer Hospital in Pakistan

Objectives: To determine the clinicopathological aspects and factors determining the recurrence and 5-year survival of patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma in a Pakistani cohort of patients. Methods: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted at the Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital & Research Centre (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan. Patients who underwent surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma from January 2011 to December 2015 were included and followed for 5 years (December 2020). A total of 54 patients was included in this study. Results: Fifty-seven percent (n=31) cases were male with a median age at the time of presentation 43 (30-60) years. Well-differentiated liposarcoma was the most common variant. Non-compartmental resection was done in 40 (74%) of the cases. The overall 5-year survival was 74% with median Disease-Free Survival (DFS) of 14 (6-48) months. Recurrence was seen in 28 cases (52%). Conclusions: In the Pakistani cohort of patients. retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma was more commonly seen in males at the median age of 43 years. The most common presentations were abdominal pain and mass. Well-differentiated liposarcoma was the most common histological variant. The overall 5-year survival was 74% that was affected by histological variant and grade. Recurrence was affected by histological variant and grade, margin positivity, and use of neoadjuvant therapy.

Postoperative Outcome of Surgery with Pancreatic Resection for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Results of a Retrospective Bicentric Analysis on 50 Consecutive Patients

BackgroundsMultivisceral resection is the standard treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) during which pancreas resection may be necessary. MethodsAll consecutive patients operated for RPS with pancreatectomy in 2 expert centers between 1993 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsFifty patients (median age: 57 years, IQR: [46–65]) with a primary (n = 33) or recurrent (n = 17) RPS underwent surgery requiring pancreas resection (distal pancreatectomy (DP) (n = 43), pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (n = 5), central pancreatectomy (n = 1), and atypical resection (n = 1)). Severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III–IV) was observed in 14 patients (28%), and 7 of them (14%) required reoperation for anastomotic bowel leakage (n = 5), gastric volvulus (n = 1), or hemorrhage (n = 1). Pancreas-related complications occurred in 25 patients (50%): 10 postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) (grade A (n = 12), grade B (n = 6), grade C (n = 1)), 13 delayed gastric emptying (grade A (n = 8), grade B (n = 4), grade C (n = 1)), 1 hemorrhage (grade C). Postoperative mortality was 4% (n = 2), all following PD, caused by a massive intraoperative air embolism and by a multiple organ failure after anastomotic leakage. Pathological analysis confirmed pancreatic involvement in 17 (34%) specimens. Microscopically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 22 (44%) patients. After a follow-up of 60 months, 36 patients (75%) were still alive, among whom 27 without recurrence (56%). ConclusionPancreatic resection during RPS surgery is associated with significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. PD should be avoided whenever possible while other procedures seemed achievable without excessive morbidity and with long-term survival.

Retroperitoneal tumors: Review of diagnosis and management.

Retroperitoneal tumors are extremely rare tumors occurring in the retroperitoneum. Retroperitoneal tumors are divided into benign tumors and malignant tumors, including retroperitoneal sarcoma. Approximately 70-80% of primary retroperitoneal soft-tissue tumors are malignant; however, these only account for 0.1-0.2% of all malignancies. Retroperitoneal sarcoma is an orphan malignant disease with a low incidence. The information on benign retroperitoneal tumors is limited. The American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM classification updated to the 8th edition in 2017. In 2010, three new drugs for soft tissue sarcoma were approved based on the results of phaseIII trials, but the histological subtypes of the patients enrolled in the trials of each drug differed. Recently, in addition to surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma, the effectiveness of perioperative radiation therapy has become interesting. For malignant retroperitoneal tumors and retroperitoneal sarcoma, survival improvement and locoregional recurrence prevention can be undertaken by carrying out surgery to secure negative margins with wide and combined resection of some adjacent organs, and cooperation with a trained medical team comprising of radiologists, pathologists and medical oncologists in centralized hospitals. Some clinical trials aimed at further improving treatment results by adding preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy based on histological confirmation using a correct needle biopsy are in progress. In recent years, molecular profiling has been used to select eligible patients for chemotherapy. In the future, precision medicine with next-generation sequencing technology will be expected among the diverse and potential future treatments for retroperitoneal sarcoma. In this review, we summarized the current state of retroperitoneal tumors and retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Update in Pelvic and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Management: The Role of Compartment Surgery

Surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas should be “enbloc” compartmental, which involves resection of unaffected organs. Its upfront use is key, providing a high percentage of resections with negative margins, resulting in a better local control and increased survival in many patients. Preservation of organs should be done in an individualized manner, especially in the pelvic location, and adapted to the histological aggressiveness of the tumor. Preoperative biopsy is able to establish the diagnosis of sarcoma subtype and consequently an adequate perioperative strategy. These patients should be managed by expert surgeons at referral centers with multidisciplinary units and oncology committees. The use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is not yet well defined, so it is only recommended at referral centers with clinical trials. Currently, this is the only option to offer the best morbidity and mortality rates, as well as possible improvements in the survival of these patients.

Actualización en el manejo de sarcomas retroperitoneales y pélvicos; el papel de la cirugía compartimental

Surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas should be “en bloc” compartmental, which involves resection of unaffected organs. Its upfront use is key, providing a high percentage of resections with negative margins, resulting in a better local control and increased survival in many patients. Preservation of organs should be done in an individualized manner, especially in the pelvic location, and adapted to the histological aggressiveness of the tumor. Preoperative biopsy is able to establish the diagnosis of sarcoma subtype and consequently an adequate perioperative strategy. These patients should be managed by expert surgeons at referral centers with multidisciplinary units and oncology committees. The use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is not yet well defined, so it is only recommended at referral centers with clinical trials. Currently, this is the only option to offer the best morbidity and mortality rates, as well as possible improvements in the survival of these patients.

New research strategies in retroperitoneal sarcoma. The case of TARPSWG, STRASS and RESAR: making progress through collaboration.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease, and until recently, its natural history and outcome were poorly understood. Recently, collaborations between individual centers have led to an unprecedented collection of retrospective and prospective data and successful recruitment to the first randomized trial as described here. A debate about the beneficial role of extended surgery in RPS triggered an initial collaboration between Europe and North America, the TransAtlantic RetroPeritoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG). This collaboration has been instrumental in harmonizing the surgical approach among expert centers, characterizing the pattern of postresection failure of the different histological subtypes, identifying new ways to stage RPS and testing the role of preoperative radiotherapy in a randomized fashion (STRASS-1 study). The collaboration has now expanded to include centers from Asia, Australia and South America. A prospective registry has been started and a new randomized trial, STRASS-2, is in preparation to analyze the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma of the retroperitoneum. Collaboration is critical to study a rare disease like RPS. Both retrospective and prospective data are useful to improve knowledge, generate hypotheses and build evidence to test, whenever possible, in clinical trials.

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS): Recent outcome improvement and refinement of treatment strategies at a single institution.

11041 Background: Extended surgery in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) has resulted in less recurrences and better survival. We investigated whether outcome further improved, after the recent understanding of behavior of different RPS subtypes and introduction of multimodal therapies. Methods: Consecutive primary RPS operated at a single center were analyzed comparing 3 periods (2002-2006; 2007-2011; 2012-2016). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of local recurrence and distant metastasis (LR, DM) for each subgroup: well differentiated (WDLPS), dedifferentiated G2 (G2DDLPS), G3 (G3DDLPS) liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Secondary endpoints: morbidity and post-relapse OS. Fisher/Chi-squared and Cochran–Armitage trends test were used. Survival was analysed by Kaplan-Meier/Cox PH or CCI/Fine Gray models in the competitive risk framework and compared with log-rank/Wald Gray tests. Multivariable analyses were performed. Results: Overall 437 RPS were operated: 82, 128 and 227 in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd period. Median follow-up was 125, 86 and 39 months. Complete resection (R0/R1) improved from 93.9% to 98.2% (p=0.059), median number of resected organs increased from 2 to 4 (p<.0001). Postoperative morbidity did not change (18.3%, 16.4%, 22.5%; p=0.269). Administration of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CT) differed over time according to different subtypes. 5-yr OS improved (63.2% to 74.7%, p=0.005), along with a non-significant reduction in LR CCI (18.2% to 16.4%, p=0.379) and no change in DM CCI. At multivariable analysis, study period remained an independent prognostic factor for OS among the other known risk factors (3rd vs 1st period HR: 0.33, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed the following associations with better prognosis: 1. Improvement in 5-yr OS (from 55.0% to 70.7%, p=0.024) and LR (from 45.0% to 19.8%, p=0.060) in G2DDLPS, associated with more organs resected 2. Improvement in 5-yr OS (from 18.2% to 49.7%, p=0.035) and DM (from 70.0% to 19.8%; p=0.015) in G3DDLPS, associated with more anthracycline-based CT 3. A better 2-yr post-relapse OS (from 46.3% to 65.2%, p=0.122). Conclusions: OS of patients with DDLPS improved over time: in G2 this was associated with a refinement in the surgical approach, while in G3 with a more liberal use of anthracycline-based CT. New available therapies for recurring RPS may also have extended post-relapse OS. Prospective studies on perioperative CT for high risk RPS subtypes are eagerly awaited.

Outcome of iliocaval resection and reconstruction for retroperitoneal sarcoma

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the oncologic and surgical outcomes of patients treated with inferior vena cava (IVC) or iliac vein (IV) resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Surgery is the only curative option for patients with primary RPS. The IVC or IV can be directly invaded by RPS or can be the organ of origin of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. In both cases, resection of the IVC or IV is required to achieve a complete resection. MethodsPatients who underwent IVC or IV resection for primary or recurrent RPS between 2000 and 2016 at a single referral institution were included in this retrospective study. The oncologic outcome was explored in terms of overall survival and crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Surgical outcomes were explored in terms of complications, renal function, lower limb edema, and vascular graft patency. ResultsSixty-seven patients were included: 24 IV resections (IV group), 39 IVC resections, and 4 IVC and IV resections (IVC group). The most frequent histologic types were leiomyosarcoma (63%) and liposarcoma (27%). Five-year overall survival, CCI of local recurrence, and CCI of distant metastasis (95% confidence interval) were 56.2% (43.6-72.4), 12.4% (5.2-29.5), and 51.5% (39.3-67.5). IVC was circumferentially resected in 38 of 43 patients; 32 were treated with graft reconstruction (22 with interposition of banked venous homograft [BVH] and 10 with polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE] graft) and 6 with ligation only, mostly dependent on the presence of an adequate collateral vessel network. Patients with preoperative IVC obstruction treated with ligation only (n = 6) did not develop severe postoperative lower limb edema. IVC graft primary patency at 5 years was 100% in IVC PTFE grafts and 76.7% in IVC BVHs. Fifteen patients (22.4%) suffered a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complication within 60 days of surgery. ConclusionsIVC or IV resection in the context of RPS surgery is of value in achieving long-term survival. A policy of vascular grafting in case of circumferential resection of a patent IVC or IV is rewarding. For IVC reconstruction, both BVHs and PTFE grafts offer good results in terms of high patency rate and low risk of infection.

Predictors of postoperative complications in retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery

Introduction: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) are large in size and often involve adjacent organs or vital structures. Completeness of resection is critical for long-term survival; however, this often involves extensive surgeries. This study aimed to identify predictors of early severe postoperative complications after RPS surgery. Methodology: In patients who underwent surgery for RPS, intraoperative variables and patient characteristics were assessed to determine predictors for severe postoperative complications. Results: Two hundred and thirty-three patients were included. In comparison to patients who had no comorbidity, those with one or more comorbidities were more likely to have postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR]: 2.38; confidence interval [CI]: 1.03–5.48). Patients who avoided admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 24 h of surgery had less complications postoperatively (OR: 0.08; CI: 0.02–0.30). Multiple organ resection during surgery and patients' age had no impact on the occurrence of severe complications. Conclusion: This study showed that a high patient comorbidity index, male gender, and early admission to the ICU were independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative severe complications. However, the age of the patient and degree of surgical resection had no impact on this occurrence. These findings suggest that age and extent of resection should not be used as a sole determinant of patient's eligibility for curative surgery.

Regionalization of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery to High-Volume Hospitals: Missed Opportunities for Outcome Improvement.

Surgery continues to be the dominant therapy for the management of retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma (RPS). Many groups advocate performing these resections at high-volume hospitals (HVHs), given their complexity. We therefore sought to explore whether RPS surgery has indeed begun to regionalize to HVHs in the same manner as pancreatic cancer (PC) surgery during the last decade. We identified 70,763 patients who underwent surgical resection for RPS or PC using the National Cancer Database (2004 to 2015). Patients were stratified by hospital surgical volume. We performed an adjusted time trend analysis to compare trends in performance of surgery at HVHs for RPS versus PC. Multivariable logistic analyses were then performed, controlling for covariables, to elucidate relationships between patient-, hospital-, and treatment-related variables that may contribute to these observed trends. Only 9.6% of patients underwent RPS surgery at HVHs. During this time period, the odds ratio of undergoing RPS compared with pancreatectomy at HVHs was 0.65 ( P < .05). Time trend analysis estimated that whereas both procedures are regionalizing, the rate of RPS regionalization grew at 30.5% of the rate of PC (1.017 v 1.056; P < .001) and remained consistent after using several hospital volume thresholds and hospital volume as a continuous variable. Results from this retrospective multi-institutional analysis uncovered a lag in the regionalization of surgery for RPS compared with PC surgery. These findings reinforce the call to regionalize surgery for RPS to HVHs in a manner that is similar to that of other procedures in complex cancer surgery.

Staging, nomograms and other predictive tools in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma.

Patient outcomes following surgical resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) are variable and therefore predicting prognosis is challenging. The risk of recurrence varies according to several patient- tumour- and treatment-related characteristics, including histological subtype and tumour grade. In an era of increased movement towards individualised patient care, the ability to predict prognosis following surgery for RPS is essential. The accurate prediction of an individual patient's outcome is important to allow adequate patient counselling and to ensure the optimal therapeutic strategy is selected. The outcomes of patients who have undergone resection for RPS can be predicted using tools such as nomograms. Nomograms take into account the relative contribution of each variable by giving them different weights and then combining them. This review aims to discuss current staging systems available for RPS and to critically appraise predictive tools that are currently available for use in clinical practice.

Current principles of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Surgery for primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) often requires a technically challenging, en bloc multivisceral resection to optimize outcomes. Surgery may also be appropriate for patients with localized recurrent RPS. Anatomic considerations and tumor biology driven by histologic subtype may guide the extent of resection in patients with RPS. This review provides an overview of the current surgical principles for primary and recurrent RPS.