Surgery For Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Research Articles

Surgical Outcome in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery: Accuracy of P-POSSUM, ACS-NSQIP, and Inflammatory Biomarkers Prognostic Index (IBPI) Risk-Calculators for Prediction of Severe and Overall Morbidity.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma often requires comprehensive resection, leading to severe postoperative morbidity. The lack of disease-procedure specific tools for morbidity risk and the questionable accuracy of existing tools (ACS-NSQIP and P-POSSUM) in RPS surgery drove this study to assess these calculators' accuracy. Retrospective analysis of primary RPS cases undergoing surgery at two sarcoma-referral centers was conducted. Predicted morbidity/mortality rates at 90days postsurgery, classified by Clavien-Dindo (CD) and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), were compared with observed data. Accuracy was assessed by Brier Score and area under the curve (AUC). Inflammatory Biomarkers Prognostic Index (IBPI) also was tested. A total of 567 patients (median age 62years; 53.6% male) with a median of four resected organs were included. 59% experienced surgical complications by 90 days postoperation, graded CD ≥ 3 in 30.5%, median CCI 20.9, with a mortality rate of 1.6% (8/567). Reoperation was required in 68 of 567 patients (12%). Thirty-day mortality was 1.1%. Severe complications occurred after 30th postoperative day in 3.5% cases. ACS-NSQIP predicted below-average complication for 65.1%, average for 16.9%, and above-average for 18% of patients. P-POSSUM predicted a 66% rate of morbidity and 4% mortality. None of the prediction tools were accurate, with Brier scores ranging 0.155-0.231 and no AUC ≥ 0.7. IBPI accuracy for predicting severe infective complication was low (AUC 0.58, Brier 0.161). The significant morbidity burden after MVR necessitates reliable evaluation, especially in frail patients. Given the limitations of ACS-NSQIP and P-POSSUM, a dedicated prediction tool for perioperative events in RPS candidates for MVR needs urgent development.

Preoperative nutritional support to tackle morbidity in multivisceral resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Early outcomes from a novel nutritional prehabilitation program in a prospective cohort

ObjectiveEvaluate the feasibility and outcomes of the implementation of a routinely prehabilitation nutritional program (PNP) in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) patients. Summary background dataRate of preoperative malnutrition is scarcely evaluated in RPS patients and the efficacy of a PNP in detecting and reverting malnutrition has not been studied. MethodsProspective study in a high-volume reference center for RPS; adult patients with primary or persistent RPS deemed surgically resectable were enrolled in a PNP. Results119 patients underwent surgery for RPS at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, 73 (61.3 %) were enrolled in the PNP while the remaining served as control cohort. 43.8 % (32/73), 28.8 % (21/73), and 27.4 % (20/73) were classified as non-malnourished, moderately malnourished, and severely malnourished at diagnosis, respectively. Preoperative nutritional support was provided to 35 out of 73 patients (47.9 %). Among untreated patients 20 of 38 (52.6 %) experienced a preoperative worsening of their nutritional status, whereas among those in the prehabilitation program 16 of 35 (45.7 %) showed improvement.Surgical complications did not significantly differ between malnourished and non-malnourished patients, potentially due to increased use of diverting stomas in malnourished patients to prevent infectious complications. Reversal of initial malnutrition correlated with better postoperative outcomes, as evidenced by lower rates of severe complications (OR: 0.18, 95%CI 0.04–0.75, p = 0.02) and a lower Comprehensive Complication Index (OR: −0.28, 95%CI -0.51 to −0.06, p = 0.02) in multivariate analysis. ConclusionsThe implementation of a prehabilitation nutritional program brought relevant benefits in terms of postoperative morbidity.

Learning curve in retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery

IntroductionRetroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery poses unique challenges. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the learning curve (LC) in RPS surgery, assessing the relationship between surgical experience and outcomes. Materials and methodsCumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to analyze 62 RPS surgeries performed by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2022 at our center. ResultsThe number of cases where the surgeon acted as first operator increased from 3 in 2016 to 13 in 2022. The surgeon operated with his mentor in 66.7 % of cases in 2016, whereas in 7.7 % of cases in 2022. LC consisted of 3 phases. Phase 1 (16 cases), with a negative slope, represented shorter operative time (OT) and fewer number of resected organs (RO). Phase 2 (30 cases) was the plateau phase. Phase 3 (16 cases), with a positive slope, indicated longer OT and more RO. Statistically significant differences were observed in terms of size (p = 0.003), presentation (p = 0.048), number of resected organs (p = 0.046), pattern of resection (p = 0.033), OT (p = 0.006), and length of stay (p = 0.026) between the three phases. ConclusionThis study focused on the critical role of LC in RPS surgery, emphasizing its influence on outcomes. We identified three phases, highlighting the surgeon's evolution. This offers a framework for educating sarcoma surgeons and ensuring exposure to increasing surgical complexity. In discussions on sarcoma referral centers and the correlation between case volume and outcomes, this study underlines the importance of evaluating LC to distinguish surgeons qualified to manage sarcoma cases within a referral center.

ASO Visual Abstract: Surgical Outcome in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery: Accuracy of P-POSSUM, ACS-NSQIP, and Inflammatory Biomarkers Prognostic Index (IBPI) Risk-Calculators for Prediction of Severe and Overall Morbidity.

ASO Visual Abstract: Surgical Outcome in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery: Accuracy of P-POSSUM, ACS-NSQIP, and Inflammatory Biomarkers Prognostic Index (IBPI) Risk-Calculators for Prediction of Severe and Overall Morbidity.

Financial burden of surgical treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

The purpose of this study was to compare the financial burden of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) and gastric cancer (GC). All patients who underwent surgery for GC or RPS between 2020 and 2021 at Nagoya University Hospital were included. The clinical characteristics, surgical fees per surgeon, and surgical fees per hour were compared between the two groups. The GC and RPS groups included 35 and 63 patients, respectively. In the latter group, 37 patients (59%) underwent tumor resection combined with organ resection; the most common organ was the intestine (n = 23, 37%), followed by the kidney (n = 16, 25%). The mean operative time (248 vs. 417min, p < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (423 vs. 1123ml, p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the RPS group than in the GC group. The mean surgical fee per surgeon was USD 1667 in the GC group and USD 1022 in the RPS group (p < 0.001) and USD 1388 and USD 777 per hour, respectively (p < 0.001). The financial burden of surgical treatment for RPS is unexpectedly higher than that for GC.

Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: practice patterns in North America

BackgroundThe addition of radiation therapy (RT) to surgery in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial. We examined practice patterns in the use of RT for patients with RPS over time in a large, national cohort.MethodsPatients in the National Cancer Database (2004–2017) who underwent resection of RPS were included. Trends over time for proportions were calculated using contingency tables with Cochran-Armitage Trend test.ResultsOf 7,485 patients who underwent resection, 1,821 (24.3%) received RT (adjuvant: 59.9%, neoadjuvant: 40.1%). The use of RT decreased annually by < 1% (p = 0.0178). There was an average annual increase of neoadjuvant RT by 13% compared to an average annual decrease of adjuvant RT by 6% (p < 0.0001). Treatment at high-volume centers (OR 14.795, p < 0.0001) and tumor > 10 cm (OR 2.009, p = 0.001) were associated with neoadjuvant RT. In contrast liposarcomas (OR 0.574, p = 0.001) were associated with adjuvant RT. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with surgery alone versus surgery and RT (p = 0.07).ConclusionIn the United States, the use of RT for RPS has decreased over time, with a shift towards neoadjuvant RT. However, a large percentage of patients are still receiving adjuvant RT and this mostly occurs at low-volume hospitals.

Intraoperative motive for incomplete resection in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Surgical resection is the current standard of care for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Recent data suggests that up to 5% of patient have incomplete (R2) resection. The exact reason why patients scheduled for surgery with a curative intent to treat ended up with an R2 resection is largely unknown. To identify intraoperative findings responsible for incomplete (R2) resection in primary RPS. All records of consecutive patients scheduled for a non-metastatic primary RPS surgery between 1995 and 2020 in a tertiary care sarcoma centre were retrospective analyzed. Among the 347 patients scheduled for surgery, 13 (3.7%) had an incomplete (R2) resection. The reasons for incomplete surgery were intraoperative finding of vascular involvement of great vessels in 5 patients, previously undetected peritoneal metastases in 5 patients, invasion of contralateral kidney/ureter in 2 patients and the need to preserve both kidneys in 1 patient because of his past medical history. Among these patients, 3 had a laparotomy without resection and 10 had a partial resection (i.e. debulking surgery). Severe postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients. The median length of stay in hospital was 19days. After a median follow-up of 12months, the median survival of patients after incomplete resection was 18months. The 1-y, 5-y and 8-y overall survival (OS) for these patients were 46%, 14%, and 7%, respectively. Incomplete (R2) resection for a primary RPS surgery is rare in specialized sarcoma center. The next steps should be to identify the preoperative criteria that lead to this accurate selection and to define the best practice in front of a peroperative discovery of an unresectable RPS. III.

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: Predictive factors for incomplete resection

Curative management of retroperitoneal sarcoma relies on surgery, and complete monoblock resection is one of the main prognostic factors. The goal of this study was to search predictive factors for incomplete resection. All patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma in two University hospitals between 2010 and 202 were included. The main endpoint was incomplete resection (R1 ad R2) after surgery. Secondary analysis was performed where marginal R0 resection was considered as complete. Univariate and multivariable analysis of demographics, radiological, surgical and pathologic criteria were performed. Overall survival, local and distant recurrence were evaluated. Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Fifty patients had incomplete resection, of which seven had marginal R0 resection. In multivariable analysis, none of the factors analyzed were associated with incomplete resection. In secondary analysis, undifferentiated liposarcoma histology (OR 12.3, 95% CI [1.416-107.303], P=0.023) was statistically significantly associated with incomplete resection. Low grade (grade I) histology was predictive of complete resection (OR 0.24, 95% CI [0.060-0.959], P=0.043). Median follow-up duration was 27 months. Local and distant recurrence rates at three years were 37% and 22.4%, respectively. In this study, we highlighted several predictive factors for incomplete resection. These factors enable us to define target populations that could most benefit from complementary therapy along with surgery.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma With Vascular Resection.

This meta-analysis examines the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery with vascular resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma. A systematic literature search based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA) guidelines was conducted, identifying five comparative retrospective cohort studies published from 2015 to 2021, with a total of 1,417 patients (180 in the vascular resection (VR)group and 1,237 in the control (no VR) group). The meta-analysis found that 30-day morbidity rates, as classified by Clavien-Dindo classification > 3, were higher in the VR group compared to the no VR group (46% versus 25%, odds ratio (OR): 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-8.69, p=0.44). Local recurrence rates during the follow-up period were similar between the two groups (30% versus 30%, OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.50-4.25, p=0.49). However, distant recurrence was more frequent in the VR group (32% versus 8.5%, OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.05-6.13, p=0.04). In conclusion, although oncovascular procedures are feasible for patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas, the long-term outcomes appear to be worse when compared to procedures that do not involve vessel resections.

Delayed gastric emptying after aggressive surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma - Incidence, characteristics, and risk factors.

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after aggressive resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) has rarely been described. This study aimed to determine the incidence and characteristics of DGE after surgery for RPS and explore its potential risk factors. Patients with RPS who had undergone surgery between January 2010 and February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. DGE was defined and graded according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery classification and classified as primary or secondary to other complications. Patients with clinically relevant DGE (crDGE, grade B+C) were compared to those with no or mild DGE (grade A). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of clinicopathological and surgical parameters was performed to identify risk factors for crDGE. Of the 239 patients studied, 69 (28.9%) had experienced DGE and 54 (22.6%) had experienced crDGE. Patients with primary and secondary DGE accounted approximately half and half. The most common concurrent complications included abdominal infection, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and abdominal bleeding. Patients with crDGE were more likely to have multifocal tumors and the liposarcoma subtype, with a larger tumor size, longer operating time, more resected organs, and a history of combined resection of the stomach, pancreas, small intestine, and/or colon. In multivariate analysis, the tumor size, operating time, and combined pancreatic resection were independent risk factors for crDGE. In conclusion, the current results indicated that approximately one-fourth of patients experienced DGE after aggressive surgery for RPS and that DGE was primary or secondary to other underlying conditions. A large tumor involving long, difficult surgery and combined pancreatic resection highly predicted the incidence of crDGE. The prevention and management of DGE remain challenging.

Key performance indicators for improving outcomes from retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery in New Zealand.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are a rare and heterogenous group of tumours. There is increasing evidence that high volume sarcoma units achieve superior outcomes than low volume units. Due to the relatively small population, New Zealand is unlikely to generate a sufficient case volume to be considered high volume. To our knowledge, no well-established key performance indicators (KPIs) exist for retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery. In order to ensure quality standards we aim to propose KPIs which will act as a benchmark and a target for future quality improvement. Potential KPIs were generated by internal discussion within the sarcoma team, taking into consideration available guidelines and evidence. Cases treated through the unit since 2015 were audited to determine historical performance against these KPIs. Eighty-six patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcomas were identified. 69% of patients were discussed at the sarcoma MDM prior to treatment, 62% underwent preoperative core biopsy. 82% of patients were seen and treated within target timeframes set by the Ministry of Health. 53% of patients underwent surgery with a sarcoma trained surgeon. R0/R1 rate was 88%. 90-day mortality was 4.6%. Surgical treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas is complex and can be associated with significant morbidity. The proposed KPIs provide a measure of service performance and provide targets for quality improvement.

DISGUISED INGUINAL HERNIA

Abstract Introduction Liposarcomas are malignant neoplasms that originate in fatty mesenchymal tissue and are the most common histological subtype of soft tissue sarcomas. They account for 1% of solid tumors in adults and are located mainly in the extremities, with the retroperitoneum being the second most frequent location. Given the rarity and aggressiveness of these tumors, it is advisable to establish a multidisciplinary approach towards them in order to improve the prognosis of patients. Clinical case Patient who was operated upon on a scheduled and outpatient basis for a left inguinal hernia. During surgery, a preperitoneal tumor was identified that was removed and revealed a high-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma. In a second surgical act, a tumor mass of about 10 centimeters in length was found, lodged in the left pelvis and contacting sigma, which extended into the inguinal duct and scrotal pouch. Finally, compartment surgery and a left orchiectomy with end-to-end colo-sigmoid anastomosis were performed. Discussion Routine examination of the masses contained in the hernial sacs is recommended since, despite their infrequency (&amp;lt;0.1%), cases of liposarcomas that have their origin in the inguinal canal have been described. Surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas must be compartmental, which requires the inclusion of viscera close to the tumor in the resection. Complete surgical resection R0 is the only potentially curative treatment. Compartment surgery should be performed by expert surgeons in referral centers with multidisciplinary teams to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Morbidity and Mortality after Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease with over 100 histologic types and accounts for 10-15% of all soft tissue sarcomas. Due to the rarity of RPS, sarcoma centers in Europe and North America have created the Transatlantic RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) to study this disease and establish best practices for its management. Current guidelines dictate complete resection of all macro and microscopic disease as the gold standard for patients with RPS. Complete extirpation often requires a multi-visceral resection. In addition, recent evidence suggests that en bloc compartmental resections are associated with reduced rates of local recurrence. However, this approach must be balanced by the potential for added morbidity. Strategies to mitigate postoperative complications include optimization of the patient through improved preoperative nutrition and pre-habilitation therapy, referral to a high-volume sarcoma center, and implementation of enhanced recovery protocols. This review will focus on the factors associated with perioperative complications following surgery for RPS and outline approaches to mitigate poor surgical outcomes in this patient population.

Prognostic factors in patients receiving surgery and radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: A machine-learning analysis

BackgroundThe addition of radiation therapy to surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma remains controversial. Improved patient selection may help identify optimal candidates for multimodality treatment. The aim of this analysis was to define prognostic factors among patients who receive radiation therapy and surgery to aid in patient selection for multimodal therapy. MethodsPatients who received radiation therapy and underwent curative-intent resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma between 2004 and 2016 were identified from a national cohort in the United States (National Cancer Database). A machine-based classification and regression tree model was used to generate similar groups of patients relative to overall survival based on preoperative factors. ResultsA total of 1,443 patients received radiation therapy in addition to surgery. Median age was 61 years old and 55.0% were female. Most patients (66%) received care at an academic or integrated network cancer program. With a median follow-up of 84 months, receipt of radiation therapy was not associated with improved overall survival (P = .81). Classification and regression tree analysis revealed a significant association between overall survival and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group, age, tumor histology, and Charlson comorbidity score. Application of these parameters via machine learning stratified patients into 5 cohorts with distinct survival outcomes. In the most favorable cohort (Cohort 1: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group ≤II, age ≤61, histology including fibrosarcoma, well differentiated liposarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma), the 5-year overall survival was 81.7% and median overall survival was not reached; in the least favorable cohort (Cohort 6: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group >II, age >68) where the 5-year survival was 41.3% and median overall survival was 45.2 months (P < .001 versus Cohort 1). ConclusionIn the absence of a defined survival benefit, patients with advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group, older age, and medical comorbidities have relatively unfavorable overall survival after combined modality therapy and therefore stand the least to gain from the addition of radiation therapy to surgery. In contrast, younger patients with good performance status and retroperitoneal sarcoma histologies with a higher propensity for local recurrence may have the greatest opportunity to benefit from radiation therapy.

Oncological results of elderly patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas

Oncological results of elderly patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas

Survival outcomes of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Definitive evidence to guide clinical practice on the principles of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) is still lacking. This study aims to summarise the available evidence to assess the relative benefits and disadvantages of an aggressive surgical approach with contiguous organ resection in patients with RPS, the association between surgical resection margins and survival outcomes, and the role of surgery in recurrent RPS. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for relevant randomised trials and observational studies published from inception up to May 1, 2021. Prospective or retrospective studies, published in the English language, providing outcome data with surgical treatment in patients with RPS were selected. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). In total, 47 articles were analysed. There were no significant differences in the rates of OS (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.83-1.03; P = 0.574) and recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.74-1.27; P = 0.945) between the extended resection group and the tumour resection alone group. Organ resection did not increase postoperative mortality (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.55-1.81; P = 0.997) but had a relatively higher complication rate (OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.94-5.34; P = 0.068). OS was higher in R0 than in R1 resection (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.23-1.44; P < 0.001) and in R1 resection than in R2 resection (HR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.35-2.36; P < 0.001). OS was also higher in R2 resection than in no surgery (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.07-1.45; P < 0.001), however, subgroup analysis showed that the pooled HR in the trials reporting primary RPS was similar between the two groups (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.87-1.42; P = 0.42). Surgical treatment achieves a significantly higher OS rate than does conservative treatment (HR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.21-3.64; P < 0.001) for recurrent RPS. For primary RPS, curative-intent en bloc resection should be aimed, and adjacent organs with evidence of direct invasion must be resected to avoid R2 resection. For recurrent RPS, surgical resection should be considered as a priority. Incomplete resection remains to have a survival benefit in select patients with unresectable recurrent RPS.

Association Between Ageing and Short-Term Survival Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

As the population ages, more elderly patients are receiving surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). However, high-quality data investigating associations between ageing and prognosis are lacking. Our study aimed to investigate whether ageing is associated with inferior short-term survival outcomes after RPS surgery. Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS between 2008 and 2019 at two tertiary sarcoma centres were analysed. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality, and the primary explanatory variable was patient age, classified as: < 55, 55-64, 65-74 or 75+ years. The 692 patients undergoing surgery (mean age 60.8 ± 13.8 years) had a 1-year mortality rate of 9.4%, which differed significantly by age (p < 0.001), with rates of 7.2%, 6.9%, 8.7% and 22.8% for the < 55, 55-64, 65-74 and 75+ years groups, respectively. The distribution of causes of death also differed significantly by age (p = 0.023), with 22% and 28% of deaths in the 65-74 and 75+ years groups caused by post-operative complications, versus none in the < 55 and 55-64 years groups. On multivariable analysis, age of 75+ years (versus < 55 years) was a significant independent predictor of 1-year mortality [odds ratio (OR) 7.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.63-18.9, p < 0.001]; no significant increase in risk was observed in the 55-64 (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28-1.87) or 65-74 (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.37-2.15) years groups. Post-operative complications are an important cause of deaths in elderly patients. These findings are relevant to decision-making and counselling when surgery is considered for patients with RPS.

ASO Author Reflections: Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery in the Elderly.

ASO Author Reflections: Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery in the Elderly.

The Role of Preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) was used to predict pathologic grades based on the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in soft tissue sarcoma and bone sarcoma. In retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), the effectiveness of PET was not well known. This study was designed to investigate the association of SUVmax with histopathologic grade and evaluate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT before operation. Patients at Samsung Medical Center undergoing primary surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma with preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging between January 2001 and February 2020 were investigated. The relationship between SUVmax and histologic features was assessed. The association of SUVmax with overall survival (OS), local recurrence (LR), and distant metastasis (DM) were studied. Of the total 129 patients, the most common histologic subtypes were liposarcoma (LPS; 68.2%) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS; 15.5%). The median SUVmax was 4.5 (range, 1- 29). Moreover, SUVmax was correlated with tumor grade (p < 0.001, Spearman coefficient; 0.627) and mitosis (p < 0.001, Spearman coefficient; 0.564) and showed a higher value in LMS (12.04 ± 6.73) than in dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS; 6.32 ± 4.97, p = 0.0054). SUVmax was correlated with pathologic parameters (tumor grade and mitosis) in RPS and was higher in the LMS group than the DDLPS group. The optimal SUVmax threshold to distinguish high tumor grade was 4.8. Those with a SUVmax greater than the threshold showed poor prognosis regarding OS, LR, and DM (p < 0.001).

Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2–3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients’ anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.