Surgery For Lumbar Stenosis Research Articles

Incidence and risk factors for incidental durotomy in spine surgery for lumbar stenosis and herniated disc.

Incidental durotomy (ID) is one of the most common complications in degenerative surgery. Due to the negative consequences of ID, knowledge about incidence and risk factors is warranted. A total of 1,139 surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis (LS) and lumbar herniated disc (LDH) were included from the spine surgery database: DaneSpine. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed for the assessment of possible risk factors. ID occurred in 10.4% of the surgical procedures. A multivariate regression analysis revealed an increased relative risk of ID by 2% per year of age, 58% by revision surgery, and 55% by decompression on multiple levels. In our single-centre cohort study, one in ten patients experiences an ID. Increasing age, revision surgery and decompression of multiple levels are risk factors of ID in degenerative surgery of the lumbar spine.

Complications of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis surgery in patients over 80\xa0s: comparative study with over 60\xa0s and 70\xa0s. Experience with 678 cases

PurposeDegenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is a debilitating condition that carries a high economic burden. As the global population ages, the number of patients over 80 years old demanding spinal fusion is constantly rising. Therefore, neurosurgeons often face the important decision as to whether to perform surgery or not in this age group, commonly perceived at high risk for complications.MethodsSix hundred seventy-eight elder patients, who underwent posterolateral lumbar fusion for DS (performed in three different centers) from 2012 to 2020, were screened for medical, early and late surgical complications and for the presence of potential preoperative risk factors. Patients were divided in three categories based on their age: (1) 60–69 years, (2) 70–79 years, (3) 80 and over. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the predictive power of age and of other risk factors (i.e., ASA score; BMI; sex; presence or absence of insulin-dependent and -independent diabetes, use of anticoagulants, use of antiaggregants and osteoporosis) for the development of postoperative complications.ResultsIn univariate analysis, age was significantly and positively correlated with medical complications. However, when controls for other risk factors were added in the regressions, age never reached significance, with the only noticeable exception of cerebrovascular accidents. ASA score and BMI were the two risk factors that significantly correlated with the higher numbers of complication rates (especially medical).ConclusionPatients of different age but with comparable preoperative risk factors share similar postoperative morbidity rates. When considering octogenarians for lumbar arthrodesis, the importance of biological age overrides that of chronological.

Chapter 12 - Intraoperative neuromonitoring during surgery for lumbar stenosis

The indications for neuromonitoring during lumbar stenosis surgery are defined by the risks associated with patient positioning, the approach, decompression of neural elements, deformity correction, and instrument implantation. The routine use of EMG and SEP alone during lumbar stenosis surgery is no longer supported by the literature. Lateral approach neuromonitoring with EMG only is also suspect. Lumbar stenosis patients often present with multiple co-morbidities which put them at risk during routine pre-surgical positioning. Frequently encountered morbid obesity and/or diabetes mellitus may play a role in monitorable and preventable brachial plexopathy after "superman" positioning or femoral neuropathy from groin pressure after prone positioning, for example. Deformity correction in lumbar stenosis surgery often demands advanced implementation of multiple neuromonitoring modalities: EMG, SEP, and MEP. Because the bulbocavernosus reflex detects the function of the conus medullaris and sacral somato afferent/efferent fibers of the cauda equina, it may also be recorded. The recommendation to record pedicle screw thresholds has become more nuanced as surgeon dependence on 3D imaging, navigation, and robotics has increased. Neuromonitoring in lumbar stenosis surgery has been subject mainly to uncontrolled case series; prospective cohort trials are also needed.

Complications of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis surgery in patients over 80s: comparative study with over 60s and 70s.Experience with 678 cases

Complications of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis surgery in patients over 80s: comparative study with over 60s and 70s.Experience with 678 cases

Is It Possible to Get Better Results in Bone Fusion in Laminoplasty Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis? A Novel Autologous Bone Graft Insertion Technique.

To define a novel autologous bone graft insertion technique, and to evaluate its effects on bone fusion in patients with lumbar stenosis who underwent laminoplasty. Fifty-six patients and 142 vertebrae that underwent autologous bone graft insertion technique between 2009 and 2018 were analysed retrospectively. Demographic data, comorbidities, and perioperative findings of patients were recorded. The midline anteroposterior (AP) diameter was measured at the bone graft insertion levels, and fusion formation was evaluated with computed tomography (CT) and dynamic X-Ray images. Pain scores were assessed preoperatively with the visual analogue scale (VAS) for both legs and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for overall life quality. Scores were re-evaluated on 1 < sup > st < /sup > day, at 3 < sup > rd < /sup > , and 12 < sup > th < /sup > months, postoperatively. Degenerative spinal stenosis was present in 56 patients who underwent autologous bone graft insertion technique. It was found that the diameter of the spinal canal increased by 37% in CT measurements. In postoperative radiological followups, fusion developed in 49 (87.5%) patients. There was a statistically significant decrease in both VAS and ODI scores in the postoperative period when compared to the preoperative evaluations. Bone graft insertion technique supports posterior fusion and protects against dural injuries during revision surgery by creating a barrier over the dura. The prevention of epidural fibrosis formation reduces the symptoms of the postlaminectomy syndrome. The fact that this technique does not require fixation material. Therefore, it reduces expenditure and eliminates the risk of complications related to synthetic materials.

Comparative Cohort Study for Expansion of Lateral Recess and Facet Joint Injury after Biportal Endoscopic Ipsilateral Decompression and Contralateral Decompression.

Study DesignThis was a retrospective longitudinal study of patients operated on consecutively in a single center from May to October 2019.PurposeThe aim in biportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression surgery for lumbar stenosis is to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of lateral recess decompression and facet preservation, employing ipsilateral (IL) versus contralateral (CL) approaches.Overview of LiteratureThere is scant literature comparing the radiological outcome of lateral recess decompression and facet preservation via IL versus CL approaches in patients undergoing biportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression surgery.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed 37 IL and 34 CL approaches. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the segment involved was carried out on the same day as the operation for comparison with preoperative imaging. Radiological assessments of recess angle, recess height, facet length, and recess dural sac diameters were compared. In addition, pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores for the lower limb were analyzed.ResultsFor IL versus CL approaches, we observed statistical differences in the postoperative recess angle (36.0° vs. 43.7°), recess height (4.27 vs. 5.06 mm), and the dural sac expansion ratio for recess diameter (1.54 vs. 2.17). There was better preservation of facet length in the CL approach than in the IL approach (91.9% vs. 83.7%). There was no difference in VAS improvement between the groups (69.3% vs. 63.6%).ConclusionsUnilateral biportal decompression via the CL interlaminar approach may offer better lateral recess clearance and facet preservation than can be achieved via the IL approach. Larger-scale studies are needed for better delineation and for correlation of radiological features with clinical manifestations.

Fear Avoidance Beliefs and Outcome After Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spine.

This was a prospective cohort study. The aim of this study is to question the influence of fear avoidance beliefs on functional outcome following surgery for degenerative lumbar spine. Fear avoidance beliefs are well-studied modifiers of low back pain. Nonetheless, the influence of fear avoidance beliefs on the outcome of spinal surgery remains controversial. We conducted a prospective cohort study including patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar discopathy, spondylolisthesis, and stenosis. Patients completed a preoperative questionnaire including the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) as well as Visual Analog Scales for radicular and lumbar pain (VAS-R/L), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short-Form 36 health survey (SF36). Functional outcome was measured at least 6 months after surgery using ODI. Sixty-three patients with a mean follow-up of 254 days (8.5 mo, minimum=179 d, maximum=534 d) were included in the study. Women showed stronger work-related fear avoidance beliefs but there was no other difference in baseline characteristics and functional outcome between patients with low or high (>75th percentile) baseline FABQ-P or FABQ-W scores. Individual variables associated with whether patients reached minimal clinically important difference for ODI were: working status [odds ratio (OR)=0.13; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.03-0.62; P =0.01], American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score (OR=0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.92; P =0.03), preoperative duration of symptoms (OR=0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99; P =0.03), and preoperative ODI (OR=1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07; P =0.05). Neither physical nor work-related preoperative FABQ scores were predictors of functional results. In our study, the FABQ was not associated with functional outcome following surgery for degenerative lumbar spine. Other psychological patient-reported measures are needed to refine selection of patients undergoing spine surgery in order to ensure better outcomes.

Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery

Background: In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated patients who underwent elective lumbar stenosis surgery between February 1, 2019, and April 1, 2019. Patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis under general anesthesia alone were compared with those who underwent general anesthesia combined with erector spinae plane block. Aims: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate whether erector spinae plane block reduced opioid consumption following surgery for spinal stenosis. Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Methods: We collected data on the pain scores, time for the first requirement for patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol, the cumulative patient-controlled analgesia dose, requirement for rescue analgesia, time to first stand up postoperatively and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: Sixty patients were included in the study. The numerical rating scale’s pain scores were significantly lower in the erector spinae plane group at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours than in the general anesthesia group. The cumulative dose of patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol was higher in the general anesthesia group than in the ESP group [212.0 (6.6) mg, vs. 107.3 (36.9 mg), (p Conclusion: ESP block appear to be an effective method to relieve pain after lumbar surgery.

Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis Surgery: Predictive Factors of Clinical Outcome—Experience with 1001 Patients

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) carries a high risk of morbidity and represents a financial burden to society. A late diagnosis can lead to severe disability. Although lumbar decompressive surgery has been widely used worldwide, the proper preoperative factors to define the ideal candidates for decompression are missing. A total of 1001 patients who had undergone decompressive surgery from 2012 to 2019 for DLSS were screened for the presence of 9 clinical and radiological parameters. For all cases, the differences between the baseline and postoperative Oswestry disability index were calculated and the results categorized as 5 different classes (ranging from very poor outcomes to excellent outcomes) according to the specific scores. Generalized ordinal logistic regression was then used to analyze the significance of the 9 parameters (coded as dummy variables) in predicting the outcome as measured by Oswestry disability index improvement after surgery. Of the 9 parameters, 8 were found to be significant predictors. The radiological grade of compression was the strongest, followed by polyneuropathy, obesity, symptom duration, gait autonomy, radicular deficits, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and level of surgery. In contrast, previous back surgery was not predictive of the outcome. Our findings have indicated that the ideal candidate for surgery will have the following preoperative characteristics: Schizas grade D, no signs of peripheral polyneuropathy, body mass index <30 kg/m2, symptom duration of <2 years, gait autonomy <100 m, no radicular deficits, 1 level of stenosis, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 1, 2, or3.

Feasibility of Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompressive Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis to Improve Back and Leg Pain: A Consecutive Single-Center Series of 60 Patients.

Introduction: Endoscopic surgery is one of the methods that achieve the goal of decompression while minimizing collateral tissue damage. Its efficacy and safety have been supported by numerous studies. There is a plethora of studies on lumbar stenosis regarding the outcomes and related issues in endoscopic spine surgery. However, few studies evaluated the outcome of the decompressive lumbar spine surgery. The present study aims to analyze the outcome of a unilateral approach to endoscopic surgery for lumbar stenosis using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and MacNab's criteria.Methods: This is a retrospective study (level IV) conducted between January 2009 and December 2013 on 60 patients who underwent endoscopic interlaminar decompressive spine surgery (Destandau method) for lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis in the Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. The clinical outcome was measured pre-operatively and post-operatively for VAS: for back and leg pain, motor and sensory grading, the ODI, and MacNab's criteria. A paired t-test was used for statistical analysis.Results: The mean age of patients was 60.82 years comprising 23 males (38.3%) and 37 females (61.7%). The mean follow-up period was 30.1 months (range = 17.2–43 months). The mean operation time was 183.6 min (ranging from 124.8 to 242.4 min), and the mean blood loss was 150.18 mL (ranging from 30.82 to 269.54 mL). Post-operatively, mean hospital stay was 2.45 days (ranging from 1.34 to 3.56 days). The most frequently involved level was L4/L5 in 51 patients (52.6%), followed by L3/L4 in 19 patients (19.6%), L5/S1 in 24 patients (24.7%), and L2/L3 in three patients (3.1%). Improvement in the post-operative VAS for back and leg pain and the ODI for pre-operation and post-operation was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conversely, the reduction in neurological status was statistically insignificant. Based on MacNab's criteria, 88.4% showed excellent to good outcomes.Conclusion: To summarize, unilateral percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery to achieve the bilateral decompression in lumbar stenosis provides excellent yet safe and effective outcomes. It improves back and leg pain and patients' function significantly.

Stenosis of the vertebral canal of the lumbar spine

The overall incidence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is about 1015% among persons aged 5070 years. Due to the aging of the population, the incidence of this pathology is constantly growing. The desire of older patients to preserve their quality of life and their functional abilities, along with the improvement of surgical techniques, leads to an increase in the number of surgical interventions for lumbar stenosis. This publication describes the classification of spinal canal stenosis. The clinical picture of this disease has been studied in detail. A special attention is paid to such diagnostic methods as computed tomography (CT), radiography, CT-myelography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Various methods of surgical treatment decompression and decompression-stabilization are described in detail.. The efficiency of various types of decompression operations are 7280%, the results of surgery not differing statistically between the types of decompression (hemilaminectomy, interlaminectomy). Decompression-stabilization operations are used for progressive degenerative spinal deformity, destabilization after the surgical treatment, and disruption of the vertebral-pelvic relations. Currently, the following types of stabilization are used in the lumbar stenosis surgery: ALIF, PLIF, PLF, TLIF, XLIF, OLIF, and transpedicular fixation. The rate of complications in the stabilizing interventions is 27.6%; after decompression operations 9.7%. The frequency of revision operations is also higher after stabilization 10.3%, while after decompression it is 6.5%, which makes us cautious about these types of interventions. Systems of interosseous fixation are also used in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. In the 14 years of followup after interosseous fixation and decompression in 142 patients, 30 (21.1%) patients underwent revision interventions, with chronic pain (38.5%) and disc herniation (42.3%) being the main indication for repeated surgery in 26 of them.

95. PROMIS scores alone are not a reliable measure of patient outcomes after surgery for lumbar stenosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT As the health care industry shifts to a value-based care model, patient-reported outcome instruments such as the NIH-supported Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), which evaluates patients’ global well-being, are increasingly used to gauge the cost-effectiveness of care. The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (SSSQ) is considered the gold standard validated disease-specific outcome measure for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis and has been found to be internally consistent, reproducible and responsive to clinical change. As PROMIS is further integrated into clinical care, its benefit must be evaluated relative to traditional PRO instruments such as the SSSQ. PURPOSE This study aims to establish the strength of relationship between three commonly used PROMIS measures and the SSSQ. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT SAMPLE See methods section. OUTCOME MEASURES See methods section. METHODS Eighty-two patients with spinal stenosis at a single academic medical center were enrolled. They filled out one SSSQ during their enrollment visit. Patients completed the PROMIS Adult Depression (AD), Physical Function (PF), and Pain Interference (PI) instruments at each visit. For patients who had undergone lumbar decompressive surgery, PROMIS scores from the first two postop visits were averaged. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the pain and physical function domains of the SSSQ against their respective PROMIS counterparts (PI and PF), treatment satisfaction component of the SSSQ against postop PROMIS scores, and combined pretreatment SSSQ against PROMIS AD. RESULTS PROMIS PF correlates moderately well with the SSSQ physical function domain (R2 0.14, p=0.0008) while PROMIS PI correlates poorly with the SSSQ pain domain (R2 0.03, p= 0.13). PROMIS AD correlates relatively poorly to the pretreatment SSSQ (R2 0.07, p= 0.02). In patients who have undergone surgery, postoperative PROMIS scores in all three domains correlate reasonably well with the treatment satisfaction component of the SSSQ [PROMIS AD (R2 0.13, p=0.01), PROMIS PI (R2 0.25, p= 0.003), PROMIS PF (R2 0.18, p= 0.003)]. CONCLUSIONS While postoperative PROMIS scores reflect patient outcomes after surgery for spinal stenosis reasonably well, preoperative PROMIS scores do not adequately capture the disease-specific impact of spinal stenosis on patients’ overall wellbeing. Therefore, PROMIS scores should not be used in isolation to assess outcomes in patients with spinal stenosis. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

The Long-term Reoperation Rate Following Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis: A Nationwide Sample Cohort Study With a 10-year Follow-up.

Retrospective cohort study of a nationwide sample database. The objective of the present study was to compare the long-term incidence of reoperation for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) after anterior fusion, posterior fusion, and decompression. Surgical treatment for LSS can be largely divided into 2 categories: decompression only and decompression with fusion. A previous nationwide study reported that fusion surgery was performed in 10% of patients with LSS, and the 10-year reoperation rate was approximately 17%. However, with the development of surgical techniques and changes in surgical trends, these results should be reassessed. The National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort of the Republic of Korea was utilized to establish a cohort of adult patients (N = 1400) who first underwent surgery for LSS during 2005 to 2007. Patients were followed for 8 to 10 years. Considering death before reoperation as a competing event, reoperation hazards were compared among surgical techniques using a Fine and Gray regression model after adjustment for sex, age, diabetes, osteoporosis, Charlson comorbidity index, severity of disability, type of medical coverage, and type of hospital. The overall cumulative incidence of reoperation was 6.2% at 2 years, 10.8% at 5 years, and 18.4% at 10 years. The cumulative incidence of reoperation was 20.6%, 12.6%, and 18.6% after anterior fusion, posterior fusion, and decompression, respectively, at 10 years postoperatively (P = 0.44). The first surgical technique did not affect the reoperation type (P = 0.27). Decompression was selected as the surgical technique for reoperation in 83.5% of patients after decompression, in 72.7% of patients after anterior fusion, and in 64.3% of patients after posterior fusion. The initial surgical technique did not affect reoperation during the 10-year follow-up period. Decompression was the most commonly used technique for reoperation. 4.

Clinical outcomes of lumbar spinal surgery in patients 80years or older with lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis of all available evidence was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of surgery for lumbar stenosis and spondylolisthesis in patients 80years or older versus those younger than 80years. A search of the literature was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library. Relevant studies comparing the clinical outcomes of lumbar surgery in octogenarians and younger patients were selected according to the eligibility criteria. The predefined endpoints were extracted and meta-analysed from the identified studies. Data from 16 observational studies including 374,197 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled data revealed that patients 80years or older had a significantly higher incidence of overall complication, mortality, readmission and longer length of hospital stay than younger patients. There was a similar improvement in the clinical symptoms (Oswestry Disability Index and pain) of patients in the two groups. No significant differences in overall wound complication, reoperation rate, operative time and intraoperative blood loss were found between the groups. Our results revealed that the clinical improvement in pain and disability did not significantly differ according to age, although the patients aged 80years or older had increased incidences of mortality and complication than younger patients. Age alone is not a contraindication for lumbar surgery in very old patients. A careful preoperative evaluation, proper patient selection and appropriate surgical approach are important to achieve successful surgical outcomes. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Transforaminal endoscopic surgery in lumbar spine: Technical aspects, current status, and evolving scope

Study Design: This study is comprehensive literature review. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of transforaminal endoscopic technique for managing symptomatic lumbar disc herniations and foraminal/extraforaminal/lateral recess stenosis and to assess the comparative status vis-a-vis existing treatment methods. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases was performed for articles, including case series, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), reviews, and metanalysis with the following search terms: transforaminal endoscopic disc surgery, full endoscopic transforaminal surgery, selective endoscopic discectomy, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, transforaminal endoscopic surgery for lumbar stenosis, and endoscopic surgery for foraminal stenosis in various combinations. Results: Results were analyzed in terms of efficacy, safety, complications, recurrence rate, and learning curve in comparison with standard preexisting open procedures. Overall, the reviewed literature pointed toward the following observations: the endoscopic techniques had shorter operating times, less blood loss, less operative site pain, faster postoperative rehabilitation, shorter hospital stay, faster return to work than the microsurgical techniques, although some of the observations were limited in their scope. Endoscopic foraminal stenosis decompression could help avoid facetectomy and fusion procedures. Conclusion: Full endoscopic transforaminal surgeries for lumbar disc herniations and foraminal stenosis are safe and effective alternative to open surgery. Similar clinical outcomes as compared with conventional open surgeries can be reached with lesser incidence of complications and better opportunities for revision surgeries, if and when needed.

Clinical and Radiological Results After Minimally Invasive Transpsoas Lateral Access Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis.

Study Design:Prospective cohort study.Objective:The lateral transpsoas access is a retroperitoneal approach for the lumbar spine to perform the lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), an intersomatic arthrodesis performed with a cage placed on the lateral borders of the epiphyseal ring. The procedure can be used to provide indirect decompression of the nervous structures through the discectomy and restoration of the disc height. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the indirect decompression following LLIF both with radiological and clinical parameters.Methods:Prospective clinical and radiological study in a single center with 20 patients diagnosed with 1- or 2-level degenerative lumbar stenosis. Radiological analysis on magnetic resonance imaging included foramen height, canal area, canal diameter, and disc height. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) collected up to 12 months. Complications and reoperations were recorded.Results:In total, 25 levels were treated. No reoperation was required. Disc height was increased by an average of 25% (P < .001). The canal area increased from 109 to 149 mm2 (P < .001) and from 9.3 to 12.2 mm (P < .001) in anteroposterior diameter. The foramen area demonstrated the effect of indirect decompression on both sides (P < .001). The height of the foramen showed significant average increase of 2.8 mm (P < .001). The results from VAS and ODI questionnaires confirmed the clinical effect of indirect decompression.Conclusion:We observed that indirect decompression by the LLIF method is feasible both radiologically and clinically with a low rate of complications and reoperations.

Effect of preoperative symptom duration on outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTLumbar degenerative stenosis is one of the most common spine pathologies for which surgical intervention is indicated. There is some evidence that a prolonged duration of neurological compression could lead to a failure of surgery to alleviate symptoms. PURPOSEDetermination of whether longer symptom duration was associated with worse postoperative disability outcomes after decompressive surgery for lumbar degenerative stenosis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGThe Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) prospective database includes pre- and postoperative data from 18 tertiary care hospitals. PATIENT SAMPLEThe CSORN database was queried for all cases of degenerative lumbar stenosis receiving surgical decompression for neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy. Patients with tumor, infection, fracture, or previous surgery were excluded. Patients were divided into groups based on symptom duration (<6 weeks, 6–12 weeks, 3–6 months, 6–12 months, 1–2 years, and >2 years). OUTCOME MEASURESChange between preoperative and 12-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was compared between symptom duration groups. Secondary outcomes included SF12 physical component score (PCS), and numeric rating scales for leg and back pain. Outcomes were also assessed at 3 months and 24 months postoperatively. METHODSChange in ODI, and secondary outcome measures, were compared between different symptom duration groups. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors interacting with symptom duration to predict change in ODI. RESULTSFour hundred and seventy-eight cases of lumbar stenosis with 12-month postoperative data were identified. Longer symptom duration correlated with less improvement in ODI (p<.001). Patients with >1 year of symptoms were less likely to achieve a Minimal Clinically Significant Difference in ODI (54.4% vs. 66.1%; p=.03) and were more likely to experience no improvement or worse disability, postoperatively (22.1% vs. 11.3%; p=.008). Similar results were found at 3- and 24-month timepoints. Smaller postoperative improvements in SF12 PCS and leg pain scales were also correlated with longer symptom duration (p<.05). CONCLUSIONSMulticenter registry data provides important real-world evidence to guide consent, surgical planning, and health resource management. Longer symptom duration was found to correlate with less improvement in pain and disability after lumbar stenosis surgery suggesting that these patients may benefit from earlier treatment.

Racial Differences in Perioperative Opioid Utilization in Lumbar Decompression and Fusion Surgery for Symptomatic Lumbar Stenosis or Spondylolisthesis.

Study Design:Retrospective cohort study.Objectives:To assess for racial differences in opioid utilization prior to and after lumbar fusion surgery for patients with lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis.Methods:Clinical records from patients with lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis undergoing primary <3-level lumbar fusion from 2007 to 2016 were gathered from a comprehensive insurance database. Records were queried by International Classification of Diseases diagnosis/procedure codes and insurance-specific generic drug codes. Opioid use 6 months prior, through 2 years after surgery was assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was employed to investigate independent predictors of opioid use following lumbar fusion.Results:A total of 13 257 patients underwent <3-level posterior lumbar fusion. The cohort racial distribution was as follows: 80.9% white, 7.0% black, 1.0% Hispanic, 0.2% Asian, 0.2% North American Native, 0.8% “Other,” and 9.8% “Unknown.” Overall, 57.8% patients utilized opioid medications prior to index surgery. When normalized by the number opiate users, all racial cohort saw a reduction in pills disbursed and dollars billed following surgery. Preoperatively, Hispanics had the largest average pills dispensed (222.8 pills/patient) and highest average amount billed ($74.67/patient) for opioid medications. The black cohort had the greatest proportion of patients utilizing preoperative opioids (61.8%), postoperative opioids (87.1%), and long-term opioid utilization (72.7%), defined as use >1 year after index operation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated Asian patients (OR 0.422, 95% CI 0.191-0.991) were less likely to use opioids following lumbar fusion.Conclusions:Racial differences exist in perioperative opioid utilization for patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery for spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis. Future studies are needed corroborate our findings.

Complications from the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis

Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis, with resultant neurogenic claudication, is a major source of pain and disability in modern societies. Surgical decompression has been shown to improve pain and disability, albeit with an increased risk of adverse events relative to non-operative care. In this review we discuss complications of lumbar stenosis surgery, including cerebrospinal fluid leak, iatrogenic instability, infection, epidural hematoma, as well as positioning-related and medical complications. An emphasis is placed on prevention, diagnosis, and management of these commonly-seen complications.

Clinical outcomes research in spine surgery: what are appropriate follow-up times?

In BriefThe time course required for the patient-reported outcomes of pain, physical function, and mental health to reach a recovery plateau after elective lumbar spine surgery was assessed utilizing a prospectively maintained multicenter registry. The work is important as it demonstrates that specific health dimensions follow different recovery plateaus and it provides evidence that a 2-year postoperative follow-up is not required to accurately assess the treatment effect of established surgeries for lumbar spinal pathologies.