Surgery For Lumbar Stenosis Research Articles

The 3-Steps Approach for Lumbar Stenosis with Anatomical Insights, Tailored for Young Spine Surgeons.

Background/Objectives: Lumbar decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis is an intervention which addresses a degenerative condition affecting many patients. This article presents a meticulous three-phase surgical approach, derived from our clinical experiences and intertwining anatomical insights, offering a nuanced perspective tailored for the educational needs of young spinal surgeons. Methods: Six hundred and eighty-seven patients who underwent lumbar decompression surgery at a single institution were included in the present study. A retrospective analysis of patient demographics and surgical techniques was performed. All surgeries were performed by a consistent surgical team, emphasizing uniformity in approach. The surgical technique involves a meticulous three-phase process comprising exposure and skeletal visualization; microscopic identification and decompression; and undermining of the spinous process base and contralateral decompression. Results: Presenting results from 530 patients, the study examines demographic characteristics, health profiles, operative details, complications, and clinical assessments. The three-phase approach demonstrates low complication rates, absence of recurrences, and improved clinical outcomes, emphasizing its efficacy. Conclusions: The three-phase surgical approach emerges as a valuable educational tool for both novice and seasoned spinal surgeons. Rooted in anatomical insights, the structured methodology not only caters to the educational needs of young surgeons, but also ensures a standardized and safe procedure. The emphasis on tissue preservation and anatomical points aligns with current trends toward minimally invasive techniques, promising enhanced patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Multidisciplinary approach for the early detection of amyloid in patients who undergo carpal tunnel syndrome or lumbar stenosis surgery

Multidisciplinary approach for the early detection of amyloid in patients who undergo carpal tunnel syndrome or lumbar stenosis surgery

Lumbar Decompression With and Without Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis With Spondylolisthesis: A Cost Utility Analysis.

Markov model. To compare the cost-effectiveness of lumbar decompression alone (DA) with lumbar decompression with fusion (DF) for the management of adults undergoing surgery for lumbar stenosis with associated degenerative spondylolisthesis. Rates of lumbar fusion have increased for all indications in the United States over the last 20 years. Recent randomized controlled trial data, however, have suggested comparable functional outcomes and lower reoperation rates for lumbar decompression and fusion as compared with DA in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. A multistate Markov model was constructed from the US payer perspective of a hypothetical cohort of patients with lumbar stenosis with associated spondylolisthesis requiring surgery. Data regarding clinical improvement, costs, and reoperation were generated from contemporary randomized trial evidence, meta-analyses of recent prospective studies, and large retrospective cohorts. Base case, one-way sensitivity analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted, and the results were compared with a WTP threshold of $100,000 (in 2022 USD) over a two-year time horizon. A discount rate of 3% was utilized. The incremental cost and utility of DF relative to DA were $12,778 and 0.00529 aggregated quality adjusted life years. The corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2,416,281 far exceeded the willingness to pay threshold of $100,000. In sensitivity analysis, the results varied the most with respect to rate of improvement after DA, rate of improvement after lumbar decompression and fusion, and odds ratio of reoperation between the two groups. Zero percent of one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses achieved cost-effectiveness at the willingness-to-pay threshold. Within the context of contemporary surgical data, DF is not cost-effective compared with DA in the surgical management of lumbar stenosis with associated spondylolisthesis over a two-year time horizon.

Pre-emptive analgesia with preoperative oral gabapentin and pregabalin in lumbar narrow canal surgery

The success of pre-emption depends on the strategy pertaining to the choice of agent and when and how, to use. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive analgesia regarding the postoperative pain management in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. The oral gabapentin 800 mg or pregabalin 225 mg or placebo were administered 1 h before surgery. The pain and sedation scores were measured through Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS). Three groups of 30 patients each were included in the study. Group 1 was administered with gabapentin 800 mg, Group 2 with pregabalin 225 mg, and Group 3 with placebo 1 hour before the surgery. VAS scores at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th, 14th, 16th, 18th, 20th, 22nd and 24th hours of surgery, and RSS scores and analgesic drug usage in the 1st to 24 hours of surgery were recorded. There were statistically significant differences between the 1st, 2nd and 4th hour VAS score averages. RSS scores changed among the three groups in postoperative period. The total analgesics employed in gabapentin and pregabalin groups were lower than those in placebo group. Pre-emptive analgesia of oral pregabalin or gabapentin minimized the postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar stenosis surgery.

Influence of Pain Sensitivity on Surgical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) has been found to be a valid tool, and PSQ scores have been shown to be predictive of outcomes after surgery for lumbar stenosis. The effect of pain sensitivity on outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery has not been examined. Hypothesis: PSQ scores would be associated with surgical outcomes after arthroscopic RCR surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients 18 to 80 years old scheduled for RCR were consecutively enrolled. Patients with glenohumeral arthritis grade ≥2 or RCR revision surgery were excluded. PSQ was completed preoperatively. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were used as patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), and visual analog scale pain score was documented as well. Active shoulder external rotation (ER), internal rotation, and anterior forward elevation range of motion (ROM) were recorded. PROMs and ROM measurements were recorded preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Rotator cuff tear size, type of repair, and concomitant procedures were documented. Patients were classified as having high or normal pain sensitivity based on PSQ scores. Results: Of 100 enrolled patients, 38 patients were classified as having high pain sensitivity. Patients with high pain sensitivity had worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively (P < .01). From the preoperative assessment to 3 months postoperatively, PROMs improved more in patients with high versus normal pain sensitivity. However, for patients with high pain sensitivity, PROMs plateaued after 3 months but continued to improve for patients with normal pain sensitivity (P < .01). Visual analog scale pain scores were higher at all time points for patients with high pain sensitivity (P < .05). Preoperatively, patients with high pain sensitivity had restricted active ROM compared with patients who had normal pain sensitivity for anterior forward elevation, ER, and internal rotation (P = .009, P = .012, and P = .006, respectively). By 1 year after surgery, ER ROM was still restricted in patients with high pain sensitivity. Conclusion: Pain sensitivity is an important factor influencing RCR outcomes. Patients with high pain sensitivity undergoing RCR showed less improvement in active ROM and worse PROMs after surgery compared with patients who had normal pain sensitivity. Preoperative PSQ may predict postoperative improvements.

Influence of Spinopelvic Alignment on the Clinical Outcomes Following Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis.

Introduction The role of sagittal spinopelvic alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients and its potential influence on post-decompression surgery outcomes is a topic of growing interest. Lumbar spinal stenosis is a prevalent degenerative condition, and with an aging population, the frequency of surgical interventions for LSS has risen. While decompression surgery aims to relieve symptoms, the potential impact of preoperative spinopelvic alignment on postoperative results remains controversial. This study examined the correlation between sagittal spinopelvic parameters and clinical outcomes in LSS patients undergoing decompression surgery. Methods This study included 100 patients with LSS who underwent decompression surgery between 2021 and 2023 and 100 healthy individuals as a control group. The LSS group comprised 50 men and 50 women, with a mean age of 55.8±12.41 years, while the control group consisted of 50 men and 50 women, with a mean age of 55.17±13.39 years. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment parameters, including pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, and sagittal vertical axis, were assessed preoperatively. Postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. Results In the cohort of 200 participants, 100 were diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and 100 were healthy controls. Both groups had an equal gender distribution (50 males and 50 females). The mean age was 55.8 (±12.4) years for the LSS group and 55.2 (±13.4) years for the control group. Among the analyzed radiographic parameters, only lumbar lordosis (LL) levels showed a significant difference between groups, notably lower in the LSS group (p=0.020). Preoperative VAS scores in LSS patients averaged 7.58±1.32, which postoperatively dropped to 2.22±1.95 (p<0.001). Similarly, ODI (%) declined from a preoperative average of 55.76±11.65 to 18.62±18.17 postoperatively (p<0.001). Patients with postoperative ODI levels exceeding 20% had higher preoperative scores and significantly altered radiographic measurements. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated PT as the most predictive radiographic parameter, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.945. Multivariate logistic regression pinpointed PT and LL as key predictors associated with increased risks for postoperative Oswestry disability levels exceeding 20%. Conclusion Our study suggests that sagittal spinopelvic alignment plays an important role in the development and progression of LSS. Addressing sagittal alignment may be crucial for achieving optimal clinical outcomes afterdecompression surgery. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the relationship between sagittal alignment and LSS.

Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy With Bilateral Decompression Surgery in Severe Lumbar Stenosis Under Electrophysiological Monitoring-Focused on Full-Visualized Trephine/Osteotome.

Although endoscopic drill has the advantages in manipulation and hemostasis, whose low efficiency and blurred vision reduce the efficacy of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression (LE-ULBD). The present study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of full-visualized trephine/osteotome in the LE-ULBD surgery for severe lumbar stenosis. Fifty-seven severe lumbar stenosis patients who underwent LE-ULBD between January 2020 to January 2023 were enrolled, who were divided into drill and visualized trephine groups. The medical records including demographics, operative duration, intraoperative electrophysiological findings, postoperative hospital stay or hospital stay, postoperative outcomes and complications were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. A total of 57 patients included 15 in drill and 42 in trephine group were enrolled in the study. There was significant difference in the pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores in both groups (p < 0.05). The mean operative duration in the trephine group (101.05 ± 12.18 minutes) was shorter than that in the drill group (134.67 ± 9.68 minutes) (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in electrophysiological monitoring, posthospital stays, postoperative outcomes and complications. Abnormal free-electromyography (EMG) were recorded in 2 (13.3%) and 5 patients (11.9%) in the drill and trephine group. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential changes occurred in 3 (20%) and 3 patients (7.1%) in the drill and trephine group and all patients recovered immediately when surgery ended. No serious complications and recurrence occurred in all the patients. Full-visualized trephine/osteotome has been approved to be convenient, safe and efficient in our study, which combined with translaminar inside-out technique and EMG monitoring especially free-EMG may offer a new choice in LE-ULBD surgery for lumbar stenosis patients.

The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Cervical Spinal Cord Compression in Individuals Presenting With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic cervical spinal cord compression (CSCC) in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). A systematic electronic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science without language restriction, with no starting date limit to June 8, 2023, to define the prevalence of asymptomatic CSCC in symptomatic LSS patients. Asymptomatic CSCC was defined based on radiographic studies. All types of studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis was performed on the reported prevalence of asymptomatic CSCC in LSS. The database search yielded 10,272 articles. After a full-text review, five studies were included in the final review, comprising a total of 1043 cases. Two studies had a low risk for bias, two moderate, and one estimated to be high risk. The range of prevalence of asymptomatic CSCC in LSS in the five included studies was between 24% and 61%. Meta-analysis on the reported prevalence of asymptomatic CSCC patients with symptomatic LSS demonstrated that the random pooled prevalence was 35% (95% CI: 23 to 48). Asymptomatic CSCC appears to occur in a high number of patients, with this study noting its presence in one-third of patients with LSS. Based on these findings, we strongly recommend that spine surgeons exercise particular caution during the positioning of patients who are undergoing surgery for lumbar stenosis. Furthermore, it is imperative to monitor individuals with symptomatic LSS closely for any potential signs of emerging myelopathy.

Lumbar vertebral canal stenosis due to marked bone overgrowth after routine hemilaminectomy in a dog

BackgroundBone overgrowth after decompressive surgery for lumbar stenosis resulting in recurrence of neurological signs has not been reported in veterinary literature. However, there are few cases described in human medicine.Case presentationA 13-month-old entire female dog, a crossbreed between a Springer Spaniel and a Border Collie, weighing 24 kg, was referred with a 5-day history of progressive spastic paraplegia, indicative of a T3-L3 myelopathy. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging revealed a right-sided L2-L3 compressive extradural lesion, compatible with epidural haemorrhage, which was confirmed by histopathology. The lesion was approached via right-sided L2-L3 hemilaminectomy and was successfully removed. One-year postoperatively the dog re-presented with pelvic limb ataxia. MR and computed tomography (CT) images demonstrated excessive vertebral bone formation affecting the right articular processes, ventral aspect of the spinous process of L2-L3, and contiguous vertebral laminae, causing spinal cord compression. Revision surgery was performed, and histopathology revealed normal or reactive osseous tissue with a possible chondroid metaplasia and endochondral ossification, failing to identify a definitive reason for the bone overgrowth. Nine-month postoperatively, imaging studies showed a similar vertebral overgrowth, resulting in minimal spinal cord compression. The patient remained stable with mild proprioceptive ataxia up until the last follow-up 18 months post-revision surgery.ConclusionThis is the first report in the veterinary literature of bone overgrowth after lumbar hemilaminectomy which resulted in neurological deficits and required a revision decompressive surgery.

High Endplate Hounsfield Units Value Indicate Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.

Lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) is a common cause of low back pain and disability, and its prevalence increases with age. The aim of this study is to investigate whether endplate Hounsfield unit (HU) values have an effect on lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis. This study was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TLIF surgery in January 2016 to October 2019. One hundred and fifty-seven patients who underwent TLIF surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis were enrolled in this study. Demographic data was recorded. VAS and ODI values were compared to assess the surgical outcomes in patients with or without process of LDD after TLIF surgery. Correlation analysis was performed to investigate associations between LDD and endplate HU value. Binary logistic regression analysis was carried out to study relationships between the DDD and the multiple risk factors. There was a statistically significant correlation between LDD, body mass index (BMI), age, paraspinal muscle atrophy, and total endplate scores (TEPS). Also, a strong and independent association between endplate HU value and LDD was found at every lumbar disc level (p < 0.01). After conditioning on matching factors, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher endplate HU (odds ratio [OR]: 1.003, p = 0.003), higher TEPS (OR: 1.264, p = 0.002), higher BMI (odds ratio [OR]: 1.202, p = 0.002), a smaller cross-sectional area (CSA) of the paraspinal muscle preoperatively (OR: 0.096, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of LDD development after TLIF surgery. There is a significant association between LDD and endplate HU value after TLIF surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis. Beyond that, results from this study provide a mechanism by which high endplate HU value predisposes to LDD after TLIF surgery.

Risk of further surgery after decompression in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis extending to the lumbar segments: focus on the number of residual lumbar/lumbosacral and sacroiliac mobile segments.

Patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) that extends to the lumbar segments (L-DISH) have a high risk of further surgery after lumbar decompression. However, few studies have focused on the ankylosis status of the residual caudal segments, including the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). We hypothesized that patients with more ankylosed segments beside the operated level, including the SIJ, would be at a higher risk of further surgery. A total of 79 patients with L-DISH who underwent decompression surgery for lumbar stenosis at a single academic institution between 2007 and 2021 were enrolled. The baseline demographics and radiological findings by CT imaging focusing on the ankylosing condition of the residual lumbar segments and SIJ were collected. Cox proportional hazard analysis was conducted to investigate the risk factors for further surgery after lumbar decompression. The rate of further surgery was 37.9% during an average of 48.8months of follow-up. Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that the presence of fewer than three segments of non-operated mobile caudal segments was an independent predictor for further surgery (including both the same and adjacent levels) after lumbar decompression (adjusted hazard ratio 2.53, 95%CI [1.12-5.70]). L-DISH patients with fewer than three mobile caudal segments besides index decompression levels are at a high risk of further surgery. Ankylosis status of the residual lumbar segments and SIJ should be thoroughly evaluated using CT during preoperative planning.

Cardiac Amyloidosis in Autopsy Case of Sudden Unexpected Death

A 78-year-old woman with a medical history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus who underwent surgery for lumbar stenosis died of sudden cardiac arrest two days after the operation. An autopsy was performed; however, the cause of death was not identified macroscopically. Congo red staining detected amyloid deposits in the systemic organs, including the heart, lungs, liver, thyroid, and kidney. Immunohistochemical staining revealed an immunoglobulin lambda light chain, which can cause the primary form of systemic amyloidosis. The prognosis of patients with systemic amyloidosis is directly associated with cardiac involvement. In this case, amyloid formation was noted in the myocardial interstitium and intramyocardial vascular wall, which caused luminal narrowing, subsequently causing arrhythmia and ischemic heart disease in each tissue, respectively. We present a case of primary systemic amyloidosis with severe cardiac involvement that was diagnosed after a comprehensive postmortem examination.

Determining Prior Authorization Approval for Lumbar Stenosis Surgery With Machine Learning.

Medical vignettes. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative condition with a high prevalence in the elderly population, that is associated with a significant economic burden and often requires spinal surgery. Prior authorization of surgical candidates is required before patients can be covered by a health plan and must be approved by medical directors (MDs), which is often subjective and clinician specific. In this study, we hypothesized that the prediction accuracy of machine learning (ML) methods regarding surgical candidates is comparable to that of a panel of MDs. Based on patient demographic factors, previous therapeutic history, symptoms and physical examinations and imaging findings, we propose an ML which computes the probability of spinal surgical recommendations for LSS. The model implements a random forest model trained from medical vignette data reviewed by MDs. Sets of 400 and 100 medical vignettes reviewed by MDs were used for training and testing. The predictive accuracy of the machine learning model was with a root mean square error (RMSE) between model predictions and ground truth of .1123, while the average RMSE between individual MD's recommendations and ground truth was .2661. For binary classification, the AUROC and Cohen's kappa were .959 and .801, while the corresponding average metrics based on individual MD's recommendations were .844 and .564, respectively. Our results suggest that ML can be used to automate prior authorization approval of surgery for LSS with performance comparable to a panel of MDs.

Post-operative tension spinal subdural extra-arachnoid hygroma of the lumbar spine: case series, literature review, and recommendations for clinical management

Objective Case series presentation and literature review of patient group suffering from symptomatic tension subdural extra-arachnoid hygroma following decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis or disc disease. The purpose was to better understand this rare post-operative complication with a pathognomic radiological sign to help recommend optimal strategies for clinical management. Methods Retrospective case series comprising seven cases from one tertiary Neurosurgical centre spanning a 10-year period from 2011 to 2021. Patients included were those known to have undergone a spinal procedure and subsequently to have developed a symptomatic spinal subdural extra-arachnoid hygroma (SSEH). A literature review was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE (keywords ‘subdural hygroma’, ‘lumbar CSF hygroma’, ‘extra arachnoid hygroma’, ‘extra-arachnoid CSF collection’, ‘CSF tension hygroma’, ‘lumbar extra arachnoid hygroma’, ‘lumbar spinal hygroma’, ‘post-operating spinal hygroma’, ‘post-operative spinal CSF collection’) and through reading references cited in relevant articles. Articles involving post-operative SSEH following lumbar spinal surgery were included. Results Rare complication with only five other cases in the literature. Dural breach described intra-operatively in only 5 of 12 total cases from our series and the literature. 5 patients in our series were managed surgically with 2 being managed conservatively. All patients in our series improved symptomatically and radiologically following surgical or conservative management. Conclusions This is a rare post-lumbar surgery complication that can cause rapidly deteriorating lower limb and sphincteric function. Surgical management with wide durotomy and arachnoid marsupialisation can lead to reversal of neurological deterioration and excellent clinical results. A delayed presentation with pseudomeningocele formation may be managed conservatively if neurology is stable or improving. It is a condition that it is important for the clinician to recognise in order to instigate appropriate management in a time-dependent fashion.

Indications, Contraindications, and Complications of Biportal Endoscopic Decompressive Surgery for the Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review

Biportal endoscopic spine surgery is gaining popularity in managing degenerative lumbar diseases and has optimal indications and contraindications. The perioperative complications related to the biportal endoscopic approach affect the postoperative outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to review the indications, contraindications, and complications of biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar stenosis. For this systematic review, articles on biportal endoscopic decompressive surgery for lumbar stenosis, including central, lateral recess and foraminal stenoses, were searched for and reviewed. Additionally, the complications, indications, and contraindications of biportal endoscopic surgery for lumbar stenosis were reviewed. Forty-one articles were included in this study. The indications for biportal endoscopic decompression are central lumbar stenosis, central stenosis with lipomatosis, lateral recess stenosis, foraminal stenosis, and the far-out syndrome. The contraindications include trauma, infection, tumor, instability, high-grade spondylolisthesis, isthmic spondylolisthesis, and severe scoliosis. Perioperative complications are typically minor; major complications include durotomy, epidural hematoma, incomplete decompression, infection, facet joint injury, neural injury, increased epidural pressure, and postoperative instability. Favorable indications for a biportal endoscopic approach are central lumbar, lateral recess, foraminal, extraforaminal stenoses, and the Bertolotti syndrome. Incidental durotomy and postoperative epidural hematomas are common complications of biportal endoscopic decompression.

Comparison of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy with Other Surgical Technics: A Systemic Review of Indications and Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy from the Current Literature

Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery for spinal diseases has been increasing in popularity because of its favorable outcomes. The goal of this systemic review is to analyze the status of outcomes and complications in lumbar disc herniation during UBE discectomy. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and OVID databases published until June 30, 2021, was performed. The outcomes of interest were indications, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, complications, visual analog scale score, and Oswestry Disability Index. Seven studies were included in our research. UBE surgery for lumbar stenosis was excluded. A total of 230 patients with lumbar disc herniation were enrolled in the 7 selected studies. The mean operative time was 74.4 minutes, and the mean length of hospital stay was 4.5 days. Mean incidence of complications reported in the 7 articles was 6.2%. UBE showed shorter hospital stays than did microdiscectomy, no significant differences of Oswestry Disability Index or visual analog scale scores, and good recovery rate among other discectomy techniques (microdiscectomy, full endoscopic transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, and interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy) at 1 month follow-up. Even with the small number of studies and reports analyzed, biases were the main limitation of this analysis; overall, the clinical outcomes and complication rates associated with UBE discectomy were relatively good. It is clear that UBE discectomy is a good treatment choice for lumbar disc herniation, but to prevent unique UBE surgery complications, a clear understanding of the surgical procedures and careful efforts to overcome the learning curve are necessary.

Postlaminectomy instability–is fusion essential in degenerative lumbar stenosis surgery?

Aim: To examine the incidence of postlaminectomy instability in cases of lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent facet-preserving laminectomy and decompression with the classical laminectomy technique, together with comorbid diseases, and to determine whether fusion is needed. Material and Method: The patients who were operated by the same surgeon in the same hospital between 2017 and 2019 and followed up in terms of instability in the postoperative 1st and 6th months were evaluated retrospectively with their clinical findings, comorbid diseases and radiological images. White and Panjabi's instability criteria were used. It was analyzed with SPSS 23.00 statistical package program. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics (number, percentage distribution, mean and standard deviation), t-test and ANOVA. Results: A total of 53 patients, 22 male (41.5%) and 31 female (58.5%) were included in the study. Age, surgical precedures and comorbid diseases were investigated. None of the patients, but 2 patients with osteoporosis with or without diabets, had postlaminectomy instability. Conclusion: It has been shown in our study that decompressive and facet-preserving surgery performed at 2 levels or less using only the classical laminectomy technique does not cause instability in patients without osteoporosis alone or with diabetes, especially in the first 6 months, and can be safely applied to patients. Osteoporosis alone or in association with diabetes mellitus suggests increased postoperative instability.

Patient-level payment patterns prior to single level lumbar decompression are associated with resource utilization, postoperative payments, and adverse events

Understanding patient-specific trends in costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) surrounding lumbar spine surgery is critically needed to better inform surgical decision making and the development of targeted interventions. 1) Identify subgroups of patients following distinct patterns in direct healthcare payments pre- and postoperatively, 2) determine whether these patterns are associated with patient and surgical factors, and 3) examine whether preoperative payment patterns are related to postoperative payments, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and adverse events. Retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database (IBM Marketscan Research Databases 2007-2015). Adults undergoing primary single-level decompression surgery for lumbar stenosis (n=12,394). Direct healthcare payments, HCRU payments (15 categories), 90-day complications and all-cause readmission, 2-year reoperation METHODS: Group-based trajectory modeling is an application of finite mixture modeling that is able to identify meaningful subgroups within a population that follow distinct developmental trajectories over time. We used this technique to identify subgroups of patients following distinct profiles in preoperative direct healthcare payments. A separate analysis was performed to identify distinct profiles in payments postoperatively. Patient and surgical factors associated with these payment profiles were assessed with multinomial logistic regression, and associations with adverse events were assessed with risk-adjusted multivariable logistic regression. We identified 4 preoperative patient payment subgroups following distinct profiles in payments: Pre-Low (5.8% of patients), Pre-Early-Rising (4.8%), Pre-Medium (26.1%), and Pre-High (63.3%). Postoperatively, 3 patient subgroups were identified: Post-Low (8.9%), Post-Medium (29.6%), and Post-High (61.4%). Patients following the higher-cost pre- and postoperative payment profiles were older, more likely female, and had a greater physical and mental comorbidity burden. With each successively higher preoperative payment profile, patients were increasingly likely to have high postoperative payments, use more HCRU (particularly high-cost services such as inpatient admissions, ER, and SNF/IRF care), and experience postoperative adverse events. Following risk adjustment for patient and surgical factors, patients following the Pre-High payment profile had 209.5 (95% CI: 144.2, 309.7; p<.001) fold greater odds for following the Post-High payment profile, 1.8 (1.3, 2.5; p=.003) fold greater odds for 90-day complications, and 1.7 (1.2, 2.6; p=.035) fold greater odds for 2-year reoperation relative to patients following the Pre-Low payment profile. There are identifiable subgroups of patients who follow distinct profiles in direct healthcare payments surrounding lumbar decompression surgery. These payment profiles are related to patient age, sex, and physical and mental comorbidities. Notably, preoperative payment profiles may provide prognostic value, as they are associated with postoperative costs, HCRU, and adverse events. III.

Performance of hybrid artificial intelligence in determining candidacy for lumbar stenosis surgery

PurposeLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a condition affecting several hundreds of thousands of adults in the United States each year and is associated with significant economic burden. The current decision-making practice to determine surgical candidacy for LSS is often subjective and clinician specific. In this study, we hypothesize that the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) methods could prove comparable in terms of prediction accuracy to that of a panel of spine experts.MethodsWe propose a novel hybrid AI model which computes the probability of spinal surgical recommendations for LSS, based on patient demographic factors, clinical symptom manifestations, and MRI findings. The hybrid model combines a random forest model trained from medical vignette data reviewed by surgeons, with an expert Bayesian network model built from peer-reviewed literature and the expert opinions of a multidisciplinary team in spinal surgery, rehabilitation medicine, interventional and diagnostic radiology. Sets of 400 and 100 medical vignettes reviewed by surgeons were used for training and testing.ResultsThe model demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with a root mean square error (RMSE) between model predictions and ground truth of 0.0964, while the average RMSE between individual doctor's recommendations and ground truth was 0.1940. For dichotomous classification, the AUROC and Cohen's kappa were 0.9266 and 0.6298, while the corresponding average metrics based on individual doctor's recommendations were 0.8412 and 0.5659, respectively.ConclusionsOur results suggest that AI can be used to automate the evaluation of surgical candidacy for LSS with performance comparable to a multidisciplinary panel of physicians.

Outcome of spine surgery in patients with depressed mental states: a Canadian spine outcome research network study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTDepression is higher among spine patients than among the general population. Some small studies, but not others, have suggested that depression may be a predictor of worse outcome after surgery. PURPOSEDetermination whether there is an association between depression and worse response to surgery among spine patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGThe national, prospective, Canadian Spine Outcome Research Network (CSORN) surgical outcome registry. PATIENT SAMPLEAll patients in the CSORN registry who received surgery for thoracic or lumbar degenerative deformity, stenosis, spondylolisthesis, disc disease, or disc herniation with a minimum of 12 months follow-up postoperation (n = 2310). OUTCOME MEASURESOswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF12 Physical Component Score (PCS), European Quality of Life (EuroQoL), and pain scales. METHODSChange in preoperative to 12-month postoperative ODI, and secondary measures, were compared to assess if there was an association between preoperative depression, as measured by PHQ9, and smaller response to surgery. Multivariate regression analysis was used to search for preoperative factors which might interact with PHQ9 to predict ODI outcome. RESULTSPatients with PHQ9<5, associated with minimal to no depression, had the smallest ODI improvement (−16.8 [95%CI −18.1 to −15.3]) and patients with severe preoperative depression (PHQ9 ≥ 10) had the largest ODI improvement (−22.8 [95%CI −24.1 to −21.5]; p<.00001). Similar findings were found in the EQ5D and PCS. Pain improvement was not different between depression levels. Multivariate modeling found worse baseline PHQ9 and ODI, greater age, nicotine use, more operative levels, and worse American Society of Anesthesiology score was predictive of worse ODI outcomes. CONCLUSIONSDepressed patients have similar or better relative improvements in disability, quality of life, and pain, when compared to nondepressed patients, although their preoperative and postoperative levels of disability are higher. Surgeons should not be concerned that depression will reduce the patient-reported beneficial response to surgical intervention.