Invasive Surgery For Cervical Cancer Research Articles

Rates over time and regional variation of radical minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: A population-based study

Rates over time and regional variation of radical minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: A population-based study

Recurrence patterns after minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: Outcomes compared to traditional surgery

Recurrence patterns after minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: Outcomes compared to traditional surgery

Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

e17015 Background: Despite the benefits of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer, population-level data describing the surgery’s effectiveness in unselected patients are lacking. We compared morbidity, cost, and survival between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Methods: We used the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database to identify women with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy from 2011 to 2014. Patient who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy were compared with those who had minimally invasive hysterectomy. Perioperative morbidity, use of adjuvant therapy, and survival were evaluated. Results: We identified 6,335 patients including 3,235 who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy and 3,100 who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. Uptake of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy increased from 46.1% in 2011 to 51.8% in 2014. Patients who were younger and treated at larger hospital were more likely to undergo laparoscopic procedure (P<0.001). Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy had lower rates of complication, less transfusion requirement, shorter hospital stays, and reduced total medical costs (P<0.001). There was no significant association between use of laparoscopic approach and recurrence-free survival (P=0.194). Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was associated with lower risk of perioperative complication and have comparable outcomes with abdominal radical hysterectomy.

Evaluating the trend of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: An NSQIP database analysis

Evaluating the trend of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: An NSQIP database analysis

Laparoscopic-assisted radical parametrectomy including pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women after prior hysterectomy—three cases

Background Radical abdominal surgery in patients who have previously undergone a hysterectomy is a surgical challenge. This type of surgery for invasive cervical cancer after a hysterectomy or vaginal stump metastasis traditionally requires a major laparotomy; however, a minimal-access approach is now being applied to this type of procedure. Case A laparoscopic-assisted radical parametrectomy including a pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed on two patients presenting invasive cervical cancer diagnosed after a simple hysterectomy and one patient with recurred endometrial cancer in the vaginal stump. All three patients had an excellent clinical outcome and made a rapid recovery with no major complications, even though two cases involved a bladder laceration. Conclusion A laparoscopic radical parametrectomy including a pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy is a viable technique for women with invasive cervical cancer or recurrent endometrial vaginal cancer after a prior hysterectomy.