Abdominal Trauma Surgery Research Articles

Focused Review of Enhanced Recovery After Abdominal Trauma Surgery in the Pediatric Population and Development of a Pediatric Enhanced Recovery After Trauma Surgery Pathway.

Traumatic injuries are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality amongst pediatric patients; improving outcomes after pediatric abdominal trauma surgery could be quite impactful. Although enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been successfully employed in adult trauma patients, there are few studies on pediatric enhanced recovery after abdominal trauma surgery and no consensus post trauma surgery guidelines for children. A systematic search of the existing literature for pediatric enhanced recovery after trauma surgery pathways was performed by two independent authors. However, no pediatric enhanced recovery after trauma surgery pathways were found. Therefore, we reviewed the pediatric and adult enhanced recovery after trauma surgery literature to identify potential impactful elements of care that could be part of a pediatric pathway. The existing literature supports the incorporation of several elements into pediatric trauma ERAS pathway. We propose a pediatric enhanced recovery after trauma surgery pathway, which highlights several principles of ERAS pathways (multimodal analgesia, goal-directed fluid therapy, early initiation of nutrition, timely administration of antibiotics, avoidance of hypothermia, DVT prophylaxis, the early removal of drains and indwelling catheters, and patient education).

Implementation of modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following surgery for abdominal trauma; Assessment of feasibility and outcomes: A randomized controlled trial (RCT)

BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) is a set of multiple perioperative care component not a rigid protocol with improved outcomes for elective surgeries. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes in trauma patients undergoing laparotomy. Study designProspective single-centre randomized controlled trial(RCT). Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy following trauma were randomized into ERAS(early removal of catheters, early mobilization and initiation of diet, use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia) and conventional care groups 24 ​h post-surgery. Outcome measures included length of hospitalization(LOH), recovery of bowel function, duration of removal of catheters and 30-day complications(Clavien-Dindo). ResultsFifty patients were randomized into ERAS(n ​= ​25) and conventional care(n ​= ​25) groups. Ninety-two percent of patients were young males, 58 ​% had blunt trauma to the abdomen and the most common indication of surgery was hollow viscus injury(88 ​%). ERAS group had a reduced median LOH(days) (6 versus 8, p ​= ​0.007), early recovery of bowel function(p ​= ​0.010) and shorter times for nasogastric tube(p ​= ​0.001), urinary catheter(p ​= ​0.007) and drain(p ​= ​0.006) removal. The complications were comparable in both groups except for deep surgical site infection[significantly lower in ERAS group(p ​= ​0.009)]. ConclusionERAS is safe and significantly reduces LOH in select trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.

Learning trauma surgery through cytoreductive surgery

ObjectivesRegarding war surgery (WS), the initial and continuing education of French military gastrointestinal surgeons (FMGIS) is considered flawed and inappropriate. This results from the low incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) trauma, its predominantly non-surgical management, and a daily surgical practice that strongly differs from WS. Conversely, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) of peritoneal metastases has similarities with WS which led us to assess its potential contribution to the initial and continuing education of FMGIS in WS. MethodsWe reported the activities of the GI surgery departments of the military teaching hospitals of Percy and Begin. The first one dedicated to traumatology and the second to CRS. We then specifically looked into the surgical procedures conducted by the FMGIS during deployment from January 2004 to December 2014. ResultsAmongst the 600 severe trauma patients admitted to the Percy trauma center between January 2019 and December 2020, 17 underwent abdominal surgery with a total of 25 procedures performed. During the same period, 61 patients undertook CRS in Begin with an average of 7 surgical processes per patient carried out and a total of 418 abdominal surgical procedures. Outside abdominal packing and nephrectomy (not performed in CRS), the numbers of splenectomy, gastrointestinal / gynecological resections (hysterectomy and/or adnexectomy), or liver resection were higher during CRS compared to abdominal trauma surgery with 10 times less patients (10 vs 1, 43 vs 9, 20 vs 0, 6 vs 0, respectively). ConclusionCRS, through its similarities with WS, seemed to be an appropriate tool for the initial and continuing education of FMGIS in WS and, to an extent, of civilian trauma surgeons who could eventually treat terrorist attacks casualties on the national territory.

True Enterolithis Formed in a Jejunal Side-to-side Anastomosis with Cystic Dilation 60 Years after Abdominal Trauma Surgery—A Case Study—

True Enterolithis Formed in a Jejunal Side-to-side Anastomosis with Cystic Dilation 60 Years after Abdominal Trauma Surgery—A Case Study—

2022 Excelsior Surgical Society/Edward D Churchill Lecture: Extraordinary Evolution of Surgery for Abdominal Trauma.

Shock Trauma Center/Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose. Presented at the American College of Surgeons 108th Annual Clinical Congress, Scientific Forum, San Diego, CA, October 2022. Correspondence: David V. Feliciano, MD 640 South River Landing Road Edgewater, MD 21037 Phone – 404-550-3506 Email – [email protected]

Challenges in abdominal re-exploration for war casualties following on-site abdominal trauma surgery and subsequent delayed arrival to definitive medical care abroad – an unusual scenario

BackgroundDuring the Syrian civil war, patients were initially treated on-site in Syria and later transferred to medical centers in Israel. Relevant details concerning the exact nature of injury and medical/surgical care received in Syria were unavailable to clinicians in Israel. Many of these patients required abdominal re-exploration for obvious or suspected problems related to their injury. Our aim is to present our approach to abdominal trauma patients who survived initial on-site surgery and needed subsequent abdominal re-exploration abroad, in our medical center.MethodsClinical data from all medical records were retrospectively analyzed. Each patient underwent total body computerized tomography on arrival, revealing diverse multi-organ trauma. We divided the patient population who had abdominal trauma into 4 sub-groups according to the location in which abdominal surgical intervention was performed (abdominal surgery performed only in Syria, surgery in Syria and subsequent re-laparotomy in Israel, abdominal surgery only in Israel, and management of patients without abdominal surgical intervention). We focused on missed injuries and post-operative complications in the re-laparotomy sub-group.ResultsBy July 2018, 1331 trauma patients had been admitted to our hospital, of whom 236 had suffered abdominal trauma. Life-saving abdominal intervention was performed in 138 patients in Syria before arrival to our medical center.A total of 79 patients underwent abdominal surgery in Israel, of whom 46 (33%) required re-laparotomy. The absence of any communication between the surgical teams across the border markedly affected our medical approach. Indications for re-exploration included severe peritoneal inflammation, neglected or overlooked abdominal foreign bodies, hemodynamic instability and intestinal fistula. Mortality occurred in 37/236 patients, with severe abdominal trauma as the main cause of fatality in 10 of them (4.2%), usually following urgent re-laparotomy.ConclusionsLack of information about the circumstances of injury in an environment of catastrophe in Syria at the time and the absence of professional communication between the surgical teams across the border markedly dictated our medical approach. Our concerns were that some patients looked deceptively stable while others had potentially hidden injuries. We had no information on who had had definitive versus damage control surgery in Syria. The fact that re-operation was not performed by the same team responsible for initial abdominal intervention also posed major diagnostic challenges and warranted increased clinical suspicion and a change in our standard medical approach.

Predictive factors of mortality in damage control surgery for abdominal trauma.

damage control surgery (DCS) is well recognized as a surgical strategy for patients sustaining severe abdominal trauma. Literature suggests the indications, operative times, therapeutic procedures, laboratory parameters and intraoperative findings have a direct bearing on the outcomes. to analyze the clinical profile of patients undergoing DCS and determine predictors of morbidity and mortality. a retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients undergoing DCS following abdominal trauma from November 2015 and December 2021. Data on subjects' demographics, baseline presentation, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, injury severity scores, laboratory parameters, operative details, postoperative complications, length of stay and mortality were assessed. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine potential risk factors for mortality. During the study period, 696 patients underwent trauma laparotomy. Of these, 8.9% (n=62) were DCS, with more than 80% due to penetrating mechanisms. Overall mortality was 59.6%. In the logistic regression stratified by survival, several variables were significantly associated with mortality, including hypotension, and altered mental status at admission, intraoperative cardiorespiratory arrest, need for resuscitative thoracotomy, metabolic acidosis, hyperlactatemia, coagulopathy, fibrinolysis, and severity of the trauma injury scores. DCS may be appropriate in critically injured patients; however, it remains associated with significant morbidity and high mortality, even at specialized trauma care centers. From pre and postoperative clinical and laboratory parameters, it was possible to predict the risk of death in the studied sample.

Predictive factors of mortality in damage control surgery for abdominal trauma

RESUMO Introdução: a cirurgia de controle de danos (CCD) é estratégia bem definida de manejo cirúrgico para pacientes vítimas de trauma grave. A literatura sugere que as indicações, tempo operatório, medidas terapêuticas adotadas, alterações laboratoriais e achados transoperatórios apresentam impacto direto sobre o desfecho. Objetivo: analisar o perfil clínico-demográfico dos pacientes submetidos à CCD e identificar fatores preditivos de morbimortalidade na amostra. Métodos: coorte retrospectiva a partir da análise de prontuários de pacientes submetidos à CCD por trauma abdominal entre novembro de 2015 e dezembro de 2021. As variáveis analisadas incluíram dados demográficos, tempo da admissão, mecanismo do trauma, lesões associadas, escores de trauma, parâmetros laboratoriais, achados cirúrgicos, reposição volêmica e de hemoderivados, complicações pós-operatórias, tempo de internação e mortalidade. Para analisar os fatores de risco para mortalidade, foi utilizada análise de regressão logística binária. Resultados: no período, foram realizadas 696 laparotomias por trauma abdominal e destas, 8.9% (n=62) foram CCD, sendo mais de 80% por mecanismo penetrante. A mortalidade foi de 59.6%. Na regressão logística estratificada pela sobrevida, diversas variáveis foram associadas à mortalidade com significância estatística, incluindo hipotensão e alteração do estado mental à admissão, parada cardiorrespiratória no transoperatório, necessidade de toracotomia de reanimação, acidose metabólica, hiperlactatemia, coagulopatia, fibrinólise, gravidade dos escores de trauma e necessidade de hemoderivados. Conclusão: apesar da condução da estratégia de CCD em centro de trauma, a morbimortalidade ainda é elevada. A partir de parâmetros clínicos e laboratoriais pré e pós-operatórios, é possível predizer o risco de evolução para óbito na amostra estudada.

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol versus conventional care in emergency abdominal trauma surgery: a prospective, randomised, controlled study

Background: Since 1990s there has been a defined role of ERAS in elective surgeries, to optimize the peri-operative care, reducing post-operative complications and length of stay and hence, the overall costs. However, there is paucity of literature in its effectiveness in emergency trauma surgeries. The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in emergency abdominal surgery in the setting of trauma.Methods: Institutional IEC approved study. A prospective randomized of 52 patients with abdominal trauma undergoing emergency laprotomy were included in the study and divided into two groups: ERP and conventional group. The ERP included early feeding, early urinary catheter removal, early mobilization/physiotherapy, early intravenous line removal and early optimal oral analgesia. The primary end-points were the length of hospital stay and secondary end-points included complication rate and re-admission rate.Results: The two groups were comparable with regards to age, gender, mechanism of injury and ISS score. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group: 4.67 days verses 13.36 days (p<0.001). There were 15 and 11 complications in the control and study group respectively. When graded as per the Clavien-Dindo classification there was no significant difference in the 2 groups (p=0.306).Conclusions: This study shows that early recovery programs can be successfully implemented with significant shorter hospital stays without any increase in postoperative complications in trauma patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for abdominal trauma.

Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia Combined with Sepsis After Abdominal Trauma Surgery

Intra-abdominal infection is a common, serious complication in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery following blunt abdominal trauma. Infectious conditions increase the incidence of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), but reports of AIHA occurring after abdominal trauma surgery are rare. Therefore, we report a case of sepsis due to fasciitis and AIHA after abdominal trauma surgery which was successfully managed following the appropriate treatment of both conditions.

Laparoscopic Repair of Near Complete Traumatic Duodenal Transaction in an Eight Years Old Child: A Case Report

Background: Traumatic duodenal perforation is a serious injury and is a result of major trauma and insult to the body. The management is difficult due to associated injuries and these children often need major resuscitation. The standard surgical treatment of traumatic duodenal perforation is laparotomy and repair of duodenal perforation. In children, laparoscopic repair of duodenal perforation is reported in only a few cases. Case: A repair of a near-complete duodenal transaction is not reported in the pediatric population. Herein, we report a case of an eight years old child who had a road traffic accident, and sustained multiple injuries and duodenal perforation, as confirmed by radiological evaluation including CT abdomen. The child was resuscitated, and later laparoscopy was performed, which showed gross bruising of the abdominal wall and a nearcomplete transaction at the level of 3rd part of the duodenum. Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of the duodenum was performed using interrupted polyglycolic sutures. The child had a smooth post-op recovery and was discharged home in stable condition. At one-year follow-up, the child remained well and symptom-free. This case highlights the role of the safety of laparoscopic surgery in abdominal trauma and duodenal perforations.

Clinical strategies for preservation of the exposed implant in chronic wounds and wound repair

Objective: To explore the clinical strategies for preservation of the exposed implant in chronic wounds and wound repair. Methods: From January 2016 to January 2019, totally 8 patients (4 males and 4 females, aged 10 to 73 years) sustaining postoperative chronic wounds with exposed implants were admitted to the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital. There were 2 cases of abdominal patch exposure after abdominal trauma surgery, 2 cases of titanium plate exposure post craniocerebral surgery, 3 cases of internal fixator exposure post orthopedic surgery, and 1 case of cerebrospinal fluid drainage tube exposure after craniocerebral surgery. The wound exudate was collected for bacterial culture on admission. On the basis of glycemic control and correction of anemia and hypoproteinemia, thorough wound debridement was performed as soon as possible and the wound area after debridement ranged from 2.0 cm×0.5 cm to 6.0 cm×5.0 cm. The wounds of 4 patients were immediately closed after debridement, including 1 case by primary closure, 1 case by primary closure after local filling of platelet rich plasma gel, and 2 cases by local flap transplantation, with flap size of 10.0 cm×8.0 cm and 12.0 cm×8.0 cm, respectively. The donor sites of flaps were sutured directly and all the incisions were treated with continuous vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) after surgery. The other 4 patients were treated with continuous VSD after debridement to improve the wound bed. The wound of 1 case healed gradually, 1 case received direct wound suturing, and the wounds of 2 cases were repaired with thin split-thickness skin grafts from the thigh or the head. The results of bacterial culture of wound exudate on admission, wound healing post surgery, and follow-up were observed and recorded. Results: The bacterial culture of wound exudate on admission was positive in 6 patients, and 10 strains of bacteria were isolated with Staphylococcus epidermidis as the main pathogen. All the skin grafts or flaps of patients survived post surgery, with the incisions and wounds healed and all the implants preserved. After 1 to 3 years of follow-up, no recurrence of wound was found in any patient. Conclusions: The postoperative chronic wounds with exposed implants can be closed in primary stage by direct suturing or flap transplantation if it is clean enough on the basis of thorough debridement. The wounds with large defects or serious infection can be treated with continuous VSD firstly and then closed with direct suturing or skin grafting for delayed wound closure, thereby to reach the treatment goal of preserving the implants and repairing the wounds simultaneously.

Outcomes of Damage Control Surgery for Abdominal Trauma Evaluated Using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score and Lethal Triad in a Single Institution

Outcomes of Damage Control Surgery for Abdominal Trauma Evaluated Using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score and Lethal Triad in a Single Institution

Impact of Genitourinary Injuries on Patients Requiring an Emergency Laparotomy for Trauma.

IntroductionIn patients having emergency abdominal surgery for trauma, the presence of urologic injury tends to increase mortality and morbidity.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated patients requiring emergency surgery for abdominal trauma at a Level 1 Trauma Center over 30 years (1980-2010). Special attention was given to patients with concomitant genitourinary (GU) injuries.ResultsOf 1105 patients requiring an emergency laparotomy for trauma, 242 (22%) had urologic injuries including kidney 178 (16%), ureter 47 (4%), and bladder 46 (4%). Of the 242 patients, 50 (20%) died early (<48 hours) and 13 (5%) died later, primarily due to infection. A concept of “seven deadly signs” of hypoperfusion was developed. In patients with GU injuries, the presence of any deadly sign of hypoperfusion increased the mortality rate from 4% (6/152) to 63% (56/90), p<0.001. Of the 53 patients having a nephrectomy, 36 (68%) had one or more deadly signs and 27 (75%) died. Of 17 without deadly signs, only 2 (12%) died (p=0.001). Of 167 GU patients receiving blood, 59 (35%) developed infection vs 3/75(4%) in those receiving no blood (p<0.001).ConclusionsThe presence of deadly signs of severe injury and hypoperfusion on admission was the major factor determining mortality. With a severely injured kidney plus any deadly signs of hypoperfusion, special efforts should be made to avoid a nephrectomy.

Therapeutic laparoscopy for pediatric abdominal trauma

BackgroundFor the surgical treatment of traumatic hollow viscus injuries, laparoscopy offers a potentially less morbid approach to open exploration among appropriately selected patients. This study aimed to evaluate utilization trends and efficacy of laparoscopy in the management of pediatric abdominal trauma. Study designTo gain both study granularity and power, our institutional trauma registry (2005–2017) and the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB; 2010–2015) identified patients ≤18 years who required celiotomy for abdominal trauma. Injury mechanisms, patient characteristics, and hospital courses were compared between open and laparoscopic approaches. Unadjusted and adjusted statistical analyses were performed. ResultsOverall, data were similar among 393 institutional and 11,399 NTDB patients undergoing laparoscopic (n = 88, 22%; n = 1663, 16%) or open (n = 305, 78%; n = 9736, 85%) surgery for abdominal trauma. In both registries, laparoscopy was more commonly employed in younger (institutional p = 0.026; NTDB p < 0.001) female (p = 0.019; p < 0.001) patients having lower injury severity (p < 0.001) and blunt injuries (p = 0.031; p < 0.001). Laparoscopy was associated with fewer complications overall when adjusting for demographics and injury severity [institutional OR 0.25 (0.08–0.75), p = 0.013; NTDB OR 0.69 (0.55–0.88), p = 0.002]. An increase in utilization of MIS for pediatric abdominal trauma was detected over time (NTDB: r = 0.88, p = 0.02). ConclusionFor the management of pediatric abdominal trauma, laparoscopy was employed typically in younger, more stable, and female patients sustaining blunt injuries. Appropriately selected patients have similar or better outcomes to patients treated with laparotomy, with no increase in adverse events or missed injuries. Increased utilization of laparoscopy to manage abdominal trauma in children suggests greater acceptance of this approach. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Abdominal trauma surgery during recent US combat operations from 2002 to 2016.

Abdominal surgery constitutes approximately 13% of surgical procedures performed for combat injuries. This study examines the frequencies and type of abdominal surgical procedures performed during recent US Military operations. A retrospective analysis of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry was performed for all Role 2 (R2) and Role 3 (R3) medical treatment facilities (MTFs), from January 2002 to May 2016. The 273 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes that were identified as abdominal surgical procedures were stratified into 24 groups based on anatomic and functional classifications and then grouped by whether they were laparoscopic. Procedure grouping and categorization were determined, and adjudicated if necessary, by subject matter experts. Data analysis used Stata version 14 (College Station, TX). A total of 26,548 abdominal surgical procedures were identified at R2 and R3 MTFs. The majority of abdominal surgical procedures were reported at R3 facilities. The largest procedure group at both R2 and R3 MTFs were procedures involving the bowel. There were 18 laparoscopic procedures reported (R2: 4 procedures, R3: 14 procedures). Laparotomy not otherwise specified was the second largest procedure group at both R2 (1,060 [24.55%]) and R3 (4,935 [22.2%]) MTFs. Abdominal caseload was variable over the 15-year study period. Surgical skills such as open laparotomy and procedures involving the bowel are crucial in war surgery. The abundance of laparotomy not otherwise specified may reflect inadequate documentation, or the plethora of second- and third-look operations and washouts performed for complex abdominal injuries. Traditional elective general surgical cases (gallbladder, hernia) were relatively infrequent. Laparoscopy was almost nonexistent. Open abdominal surgical skills therefore remain a necessity for the deployed US Military General Surgeons; this is at odds with the shifting paradigm from open to laparoscopic skills in stateside civilian and military hospitals. Epidemiologic study, level III.

Laparoscopic Surgery in Abdominal Trauma: Retrospective Study in a Trauma Center in Brazil

Menegozzo, Carlos Augusto M. MD; Damous, Sergio H.B. MD, FACS; Alves, Pedro H.F. MD; Bernini, Celso O. MD; Utiyama, Edivaldo MD, PhD Author Information

Low values of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) during surgery and anastomotic leak of abdominal trauma patients

BackgroundThere is a well known relationship between hypoperfusion and postoperative complications like anastomotic leak. No studies have been done addressing this relationship in the context of abdominal trauma surgery. Central venous oxygen saturation is an important hypoperfusion marker of potential use in abdominal trauma surgery for identifying the risk of anastomotic leak development. The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between low values of central venous oxygen saturation and anastomotic leak of gastrointestinal sutures in the postoperative period in abdominal trauma surgery.MethodsA cross-sectional prospective study was performed. Patients over 14 years old who required surgical gastrointestinal repair secondary to abdominal trauma were included. Anastomotic leak diagnosis was confirmed through clinical manifestations and diagnostic images or secondary surgery when needed. Central venous oxygen blood saturation was measured at the beginning of surgery through a central catheter. Demographic data, trauma mechanism, anatomic site of trauma, hemoglobin levels, abdominal trauma index, and comorbidities were assessed as secondary variables.ResultsPatients who developed anastomotic leak showed lower mean central venous oxygen saturation levels (60.0% ± 2.94%) than those who did not (69.89% ± 7.21%) (p = 0.010).ConclusionsCentral venous oxygen saturation <65% was associated with the development of gastrointestinal leak during postoperative time of patients who underwent surgery secondary to abdominal trauma.

Laparoscopy has a therapeutic role in the management of abdominal trauma: A matched-pair analysis

IntroductionLaparoscopy is increasingly utilised as a diagnostic tool in management of abdominal trauma; however its role in therapeutic intervention remains unexplored. The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopy with laparotomy in the treatment of abdominal trauma in haemodynamically stable patients. MethodsA review of patients undergoing surgery for abdominal trauma between January 2004–2014 identified 25 patients who underwent laparoscopy for therapeutic intervention (TL). This group was matched with 25 similar patients undergoing laparotomy (LT). Matching of the two cohorts was based on patient characteristics, severity of injuries, haemodynamic compromise and radiological findings. Peri-operative outcomes were compared. DiscussionPatient characteristics were similar in TL and LT patients for age (median 33 vs. 26 years), gender distribution and clinical presentation. Injury severity score was also similar with a median of 16 in both groups (major trauma = ISS>15, normal range 0–75). Types of injuries included; hollow viscus [bowel repair = 10 (TL) vs. 16 (LT)] and solid organs [5(TL) vs. 2 (LT)].Median operating time was similar in both groups; 105(TL) compared to 98 (LT) minutes. Post-operative complications (1 vs. 10, p = 0.02), analgesia requirements, specifically opiate use (34 vs. 136 morphine equivalents, p = 0.002) and hospital stay (4 vs. 9 days, p = 0.03) were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group. ConclusionsAbdominal trauma in haemodynamically stable patients can be managed effectively and safely with laparoscopy by experienced surgeons. Major benefits may include lower morbidity, reduced pain, and shorter length of hospital stay.

Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Injury of the Digestive Tract due to Abdominal Trauma Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Abdominal Trauma

Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Injury of the Digestive Tract due to Abdominal Trauma Evaluation of Laparoscopic Surgery for Abdominal Trauma